Fantasy Football Today - fantasy football rankings, cheatsheets, and information
A Fantasy Football Community!




Create An Account  |  Advertise  |  Contact      






Mike Davis | Archive | Email |
Staff Writer


Ask Matthew Schiff!
Q & A: Week 15
12/11/14

Last Week's Question: How does your league handle anonymous accusations?

In last week's column, I described the situation of a commissioner who wanted to protect the identity of one wronged McCoy in a league full of Hatfields.

In attempting to keep McCoy's identity secret, the commissioner exposed himself to accusations by the Hatfields that he (the commissioner) had fabricated McCoy's complaint out of thin air.
Even though I took pains to describe the ways that the Hatfields might engage in coordinated retaliation against McCoy, no one wrote in to advocate keeping McCoy's identity a secret.

Everyone who responded shared the opinion that any FFer who wants to file a complaint with his league commissioner should be willing to take ownership of the complaint. T.G.'s league has made this a point of policy:

I tell the managers in my league to post a message on our message board with whatever complaint they may have. I have managers publicly vote on trades as well. This year we had 5 trades go through with no issues.

I have it that way because it's unfair for a commissioner to endure all the animosity that arises when something doesn't go a manager's way. People need to step up instead of hiding behind their commissioner.


I also heard from a reader named Chris, who reported that he witnessed something similar to the Hatfield-McCoy scenario in his own league this year:

I had nearly the EXACT scenario happen. The only difference was that one son had hacked into the other son's account and approved trades between the two. Pa Hatfield was not willing to do anything about it because, as he said, “This is one of the only fun things I am able to do with my boys, so that’s just the way it is.”

I am sure you will get this a lot, but I made the choice to leave the league the following year, thus preserving friendships.

Actually found a league where the morals are high.


We can take a few lessons away from Chris' comment.

First, wherever there is competition (as in fantasy football), there will always be room for what some people would call cheating and what others (such as a reader named Ray) might characterize as "overly aggressive interpretations of the rules."

Second, there's no reason to jeopardize real life relationships in the name of fantasy football. If the behavior of the other folks in your league seems dishonest, you don't have to choose between 1) hiding anonymously behind the commissioner; or 2) publicly accusing a co-worker or old friend of cheating. You can always just find a new league, as Chris did.

Third, please note that Chris didn't report having any trouble finding a league "where the morals are high." It's true that for some people, the main reason to play fantasy football is to win money. For others, there's simply a compulsion to win. But most of us play fantasy football to have fun.
If you're spending your time wondering whether the other players in your league are behaving ethically (whether they are doing anything objectionable or not), then you probably aren't having a lot of fun. There's presumably something about the culture of the league that gets your hackles up.

Trying to police the league through anonymous complaints to the commissioner might address one or two things that bug you, but it's unlikely that any amount of policing will make FF fun for you if you fundamentally distrust the people you're playing with. If you aren't having fun in your league, by all means find another one. If you don't know how to start looking, I suggest posting on the bulletin boards at FFToday. There's a whole discussion forum called "Find a League, Fill a League" that can help steer you in the right direction.

Thanks to everyone who weighed in on this question, and if anyone wants to make a belated case FOR anonymous complaints, I will do my best to squeeze in your commentary before the end of the season.

This Week's Question: What do you want to ask Matthew Schiff about Survivor Pools?

For week 16, we'll depart from our usual fantasy discussion so that the real star of this column (the one and only Matthew Schiff) can field questions about the structure and organization of survival pools.

Matthew has received some questions this season about administrative fees that he would like to address in Week 16.

If you have additional questions for him, you can email him directly or ask me to pass them along. Either way, I look forward to featuring his Survivor Pool commentary (in addition to his picks, of course!) in Week 16.

Week 17 Teaser: A Taste of Hybridity

As I mentioned a couple of weeks ago, I've received a number of very interesting (and surprisingly disparate) models for incorporating an element of "total points" scoring into traditional H2H leagues. I'll be featuring a number of such models in the final week of the regular season. Check out this minor tweak from Bill to get a sense of the kind of thing we'll be discussing:

We play a standard HTH format with a minor twist. The final playoff spot is awarded to the team with the best all-play record. So the 5 non-qualifying teams' individual records are thrown out and the all-play record is compared. The only additional rule in comparing all-play records is that a HTH win is worth 4 wins. Sounds complicated but it’s not so bad.

So Team A has 103 all-play wins and team B has 100. If Team B beat Team A in their only HTH matchup they would get the spot; otherwise Team A gets it.

This season we have a team whose all-play record is second in the league but is mired at 6-6. They have, however, clinched a playoff spot based on all-play record. It takes much of the sting from a high-scoring team that has bad luck.


If your league does something to help out high-scoring teams that simply run into bad luck from the scheduling gods, please consider letting me know about it. The most interesting models will be featured in this column in Week 17.

Survivor Picks - Week 15 (Courtesy of Matthew Schiff)

#3: Tampa at Carolina (13-1: PIT, NO, CIN, SF, CLE, SD, NE, KC, SEA, DEN, GB, PHL, STL, DET)

Upset Special. These teams are very similar in nature. They both lack an identity and a sense of purpose, and both feature rookie receivers who are trying to establish themselves as playmakers. Kelvin Benjamin and Mike Evans will battle it out as to who is the better receiver with a competition of “anything you can do, I can do better” that should be very entertaining. But ultimately this game will come down to who can run the ball better. Carolina is looking to reestablish the two-headed running attack of Jonathan Stewart and DeAngelo Williams, but the real story about the ground attack in this game is that Doug Martin (who is finally healthy again) is poised for a resurgence. To top it off, the Panthers will be feeling the effects of the absence of Cam Newton, who will be out because of injuries sustained from flipping his car earlier this week.

#2: Indianapolis over Houston (9-5: CHI, Sea, NO, TB, DET, Den, CLE, MIA, KC, BAL, SF, GB, HOU, MN)

If you had to rely on one potential playoff team that 1) wants to win badly this week, and 2) has a suspect opponent to play against, then look no further than the Colts hosting the Texans. Andrew Luck is having a fantastic year, and he should continue to have success through the air against a Texans team that yields the fifth most yards per game. But as Colts fans know, yards don’t always translate to points, and this one may be closer than the touchdown spread indicates. Even so, with your options limited because you’ve used the likes of Baltimore, Green Bay, New England, and other teams with favorable matchups, the Colts may be your best option.

Odell Beckham Jr.
Image by Tilt Creative (Ty Schiff)

#1: NY Giants over Washington (11-3: PHI, DEN, NE, SD, GB, SEA, BAL, DAL, CIN, AZ, WAS, IND, DET, NO)

What a difference a week makes. Don’t get me wrong. These Giants are not a good football team--or even a consistent one. But this week they play a Washington Redskins team that has to start Robert Griffin III, a player that Coach Gruden has already stated won’t be back next year, because Colt McCoy is unable to play due to injury. So why are the Giants the lock of the week this week? Well, there are two reasons. First off, Tom Coughlin still has this locker room. Somehow, even though his team seems out of it, he can still motivate his players. Secondly, Odell Beckham has been the best addition to this roster, or maybe any NFL roster, in a long time. His play is getting better every week, and it’s just a matter of time before Eli passes the torch to the kid as the new face of this team. This week though, Manning and Beckham share the stage at home against a defense that has given up the eighth most points (and tenth most yards) in the entire league to opponents. While Perry Fewell’s defense hasn’t been great, it has been better of late, and the G-Men should be able to play well enough to pull out the victory.


Mike Davis has been writing about fantasy football since 1999. As a landlocked Oklahoman who longs for the sound of ocean waves, he also writes about ocean colonization under the pen name Studio Dongo. The latest installment in his science fiction series can be found here.