Fantasy Football Today - fantasy football rankings, cheatsheets, and information
A Fantasy Football Community!




Create An Account  |  Advertise  |  Contact      






Doug Orth | Archive | Email |
Staff Writer


What's the Catch?: WRs
All Out Blitz: Volume 139
10/4/18
WRs | TEs

Like a good news channel, I try to remain fair and balanced. (OK, probably not a good time for political humor from someone who doesn't follow politics anymore.) Seriously though, after two weeks of focusing on running backs, I felt it was time to give receivers and tight ends some respect after focusing on running backs over the last two weeks. And so I shall …

Tracking real and fantasy efficiency is one of the best methods to not only see what is sustainable, but it is also a great way to find what players are potentially in line to break out (or identify candidates unable to continue producing at their current rate). This week, we'll utilize data from a number of sources to see how efficient receivers and tight ends have been a quarter of the way through the season.

Key:

Rts/Tar - The number of pass routes a player runs for every target (lower the number, the better)

Rts/Rec - The number of pass routes a player runs for every reception (lower the better)

FP/Rt - How many fantasy points a player averages for each route he runs (higher the better)

FP/Tar - How many fantasy points a player averages for each target he sees (higher the better)

Note: To qualify for each table below, a receiver must average at least four targets, while a tight end needed at least three. In the receiver table, I included Doug Baldwin and Jamison Crowder because I believe they are notable. Baldwin has played about six quarters of football this season, while Crowder is someone I expect to become very relevant if/when Chris Thompson and/or Jordan Reed are forced to miss time. Both players' averages are italicized for the aforementioned reasons and not included in the "league average" marks at the bottom of the table.

 Wide Receivers
Rk Player Tm G Tar Rec Rts/Tar Rts/Rec FP/Rt FP/Tar
1 Corey Davis TEN 4 39 22 3.21 5.68 0.47 1.52
2 Keke Coutee HOU 1 15 11 3.27 4.45 0.44 1.45
3 Taywan Taylor TEN 4 19 14 3.32 4.50 0.54 1.78
4 Julio Jones ATL 4 43 29 3.37 5.00 0.55 1.87
5 Albert Wilson MIA 4 17 12 3.53 5.00 0.70 2.46
6 Mike Evans TB 4 39 29 3.69 4.97 0.61 2.25
7 Michael Thomas NO 4 44 42 3.70 3.88 0.62 2.28
8 Quincy Enunwa NYJ 4 34 21 3.71 6.00 0.43 1.61
9 Adam Thielen MIN 4 55 40 3.73 5.13 0.48 1.81
10 Antonio Brown PIT 4 52 29 3.73 6.69 0.38 1.43
11 Odell Beckham Jr. NYG 4 43 31 3.86 5.35 0.39 1.51
12 Demaryius Thomas DEN 4 33 20 3.94 6.50 0.33 1.30
13 Doug Baldwin SEA 2 8 5 4.13 6.60 0.28 1.14
14 DeAndre Hopkins HOU 4 44 30 4.14 6.07 0.47 1.95
15 JuJu Smith-Schuster PIT 4 46 31 4.17 6.19 0.41 1.71
16 Jarvis Landry CLE 4 40 24 4.18 6.96 0.37 1.53
17 Golden Tate DET 4 38 28 4.18 5.68 0.54 2.26
18 Keenan Allen LAC 4 33 24 4.21 5.79 0.40 1.70
19 Robert Woods LAR 4 32 24 4.22 5.63 0.56 2.38
20 Tyreek Hill KC 4 31 23 4.23 5.70 0.60 2.53
21 Chris Godwin TB 4 21 15 4.24 5.93 0.57 2.40
22 A.J. Green CIN 4 33 20 4.24 7.00 0.56 2.35
23 Brandon Marshall SEA 4 20 10 4.40 8.80 0.32 1.43
24 Larry Fitzgerald ARI 4 24 15 4.42 7.07 0.27 1.21
25 Brandin Cooks LAR 4 31 26 4.45 5.31 0.57 2.54
26 Will Fuller HOU 3 22 17 4.50 5.82 0.62 2.79
27 Allen Robinson CHI 4 32 19 4.50 7.58 0.32 1.46
28 Martavis Bryant OAK 3 15 9 4.53 7.56 0.30 1.37
29 Tyler Boyd CIN 4 33 26 4.55 5.77 0.49 2.22
30 DeSean Jackson TB 4 22 17 4.59 5.94 0.77 3.52
31 T.Y. Hilton IND 4 35 21 4.66 7.76 0.38 1.78
32 Emmanuel Sanders DEN 4 30 24 4.67 5.83 0.52 2.42
33 Davante Adams GB 4 39 28 4.69 6.54 0.41 1.91
34 Phillip Dorsett NE 4 27 16 4.70 7.94 0.35 1.65
35 Taylor Gabriel CHI 4 28 22 4.71 6.00 0.42 2.00
36 Cole Beasley DAL 4 21 16 4.76 6.25 0.35 1.64
37 Cooper Kupp LAR 4 28 23 4.82 5.87 0.62 3.00
38 Stefon Diggs MIN 4 39 27 4.85 7.00 0.41 1.97
39 Dede Westbrook JAC 4 25 21 4.96 5.90 0.44 2.20
40 Michael Crabtree BAL 4 34 18 4.97 9.39 0.25 1.25
41 Antonio Callaway CLE 4 24 10 5.04 12.10 0.27 1.34
42 Nelson Agholor PHI 4 35 25 5.20 7.28 0.27 1.41
43 Sammy Watkins KC 4 20 14 5.25 7.50 0.41 2.14
44 Devin Funchess CAR 3 20 14 5.30 7.57 0.29 1.53
45 Kelvin Benjamin BUF 4 20 7 5.30 15.14 0.21 1.11
46 Randall Cobb GB 3 25 17 5.32 7.82 0.30 1.62
47 Alshon Jeffery PHI 1 9 8 5.44 6.13 0.50 2.72
48 Geronimo Allison GB 4 27 19 5.44 7.74 0.41 2.22
49 Calvin Ridley ATL 4 21 15 5.52 7.73 0.68 3.75
50 Christian Kirk ARI 4 20 16 5.60 7.00 0.28 1.58
51 Kenny Golladay DET 4 31 23 5.61 7.57 0.39 2.19
52 John Brown BAL 4 28 15 5.64 10.53 0.43 2.40
53 Willie Snead BAL 4 23 18 5.70 7.28 0.33 1.90
54 Ted Ginn Jr. NO 4 21 12 5.76 10.08 0.31 1.81
55 Sterling Shepard NYG 4 28 24 5.82 6.79 0.36 2.10
56 Kenny Stills MIA 4 18 12 5.94 8.92 0.49 2.91
57 Amari Cooper OAK 4 28 21 5.96 7.95 0.33 1.96
58 Mohamed Sanu ATL 4 23 16 6.04 8.69 0.29 1.74
59 Marvin Jones DET 4 28 15 6.21 11.60 0.29 1.80
60 Tyler Lockett SEA 4 21 17 6.38 7.88 0.45 2.88
61 Donte Moncrief JAC 4 21 12 6.38 11.17 0.29 1.87
62 Pierre Garcon SF 4 20 11 6.40 11.64 0.20 1.26
63 Mike Williams LAC 4 17 12 6.41 9.08 0.46 2.96
64 Courtland Sutton DEN 4 19 8 6.47 15.38 0.18 1.17
65 Torrey Smith CAR 3 15 7 6.53 14.00 0.20 1.31
66 Jordy Nelson OAK 4 24 16 6.67 10.00 0.35 2.31
67 Adam Humphries TB 4 19 13 6.74 9.85 0.18 1.24
68 Keelan Cole JAC 4 22 17 6.86 8.88 0.30 2.07
69 Chester Rogers IND 4 20 16 7.25 9.06 0.20 1.47
70 Ryan Grant IND 4 22 18 7.41 9.06 0.26 1.95
71 Rashard Higgins CLE 4 17 13 7.88 10.31 0.23 1.81
72 Paul Richardson WAS 3 13 9 7.92 11.44 0.27 2.16
73 Laquon Treadwell MIN 4 18 12 8.50 12.75 0.20 1.67
74 Jamison Crowder WAS 3 11 9 8.82 10.78 0.27 2.40
League Average 1973 1356 4.88 7.10 0.40 1.94

The first unexpected finding (of many) with this research is how heavily targeted the Titans' starting receiver duo of Corey Davis and Taywan Taylor has been so far. It is one thing for a team to have one receiver (Davis) get targeted once every 3.21 routes (the best mark among all receivers in the table above). It's an entirely another thing for the second receiver on that list to be his teammate (Taylor). Taylor's role was already beginning to expand prior to Rishard Matthews' departure, but his 34 routes run in Week 4 were more than the total of his first three weeks combined. He rewarded Tennessee with seven catches and 77 yards on nine targets. His fantasy points per target and fantasy points per route are both below average (which is a good thing in this case), so owners would be wise to start investing in him if they haven't already done so. Since moving into a more prominent role in Week 3, Taylor has seen 22.2 percent of the Titans' targets, especially notable since one of those games came against Jacksonville. (He led the team with five targets in that game.)

In case anyone wants to hate on Julio Jones for his "inability" to find the end zone, chew on this. He's on pace for over 2,000 yards receiving. Yet, some still think he's been a disappointment. He ranks third on the routes per target list behind the aforementioned Tennessee duo above. He's going to be fine, folks. And don't think for a second the emergence of Calvin Ridley doesn't help him. Either Ridley is going to join Randy Moss has the only rookie receiver to catch more than 15 touchdown passes or there is going to be some serious market correction working in Jones' favor in the near future.

If four games are any indication, we might have our answer in regards to how close to the end Eli Manning is. Odell Beckham Jr. (31) and Sterling Shepard (24) are on pace for 124 and 96 catches, respectively, but somehow neither receiver is averaging more than 10.6 yards per reception. Beckham's 1.51 fantasy points per target are in the same neighborhood as (or worse than) Cole Beasley (1.64), Brandon Marshall (1.43), Nelson Agholor (1.41) and Larry Fitzgerald (1.21). The only reason Shepard (2.10) isn't right there with OBJ is because he's scored the last two weeks, but it's still damning for Manning and shows the lack of faith the team has in its rebuilt offensive line that two dynamic weapons such as Beckham (10.6) and Shepard (9.5) have essentially been turned into possession receivers.

How good are the Rams? All three of their top receivers are inside the top 15 in fantasy points per target. It should come as no surprise Ridley (3.75) sits atop the list with six TD catches and DeSean Jackson (3.52) ranks right behind him, but Cooper Kupp (3.00), Brandin Cooks (2.54) and Robert Woods (2.38) are all hanging around the same neighborhood as big-play threats such as Mike Williams (2.96), Tyreek Hill (2.53) and John Brown (2.40). History tells us such efficiency isn't sustainable for the long haul - all three players are catching at least 75 percent of their targets - since none of them are inside the top 20 receivers in total targets, but don't treat this as a sell-high recommendation. HC Sean McVay's offenses have a history of being efficient - he led a Washington offense in 2016 that saw four players catch 66 passes despite the fact none of them saw more than 114 targets - so enjoy the ride. Regression is coming (as it typically does), but this has the feel of being one of those offenses that comes around about every five years - the 2013 Denver Broncos comes to mind - as a unit that can not only support three fantasy receivers, but all of them can finish inside the top 20 at their position in fantasy.

Any article talking about receivers is not complete unless it mentions how absurd Michael Thomas' 42 catches on 44 targets is. For context, Adam Thielen has 11 more targets and four fewer receptions. Two others (Antonio Brown and JuJu Smith-Schuster) also have more targets than Thomas, but neither has been anywhere close to as efficient as Thomas. His 3.88 routes per reception is more than one route per reception better than the next full-time qualified receiver on the list (Mike Evans; 4.97). What it means is obvious: despite how much owners think Alvin Kamara is getting the ball (his 47 targets are three more than Thomas and his 91 total touches trails only Todd Gurley's 94), Thomas is going to see the ball more than 25 percent of the time he runs a route - as evidenced by his 27.3 percent target share.

I would be remiss if I didn't include a few words about one of this week's hottest waiver-wire pickups in Keke Coutee. Perhaps there are more than a handful of owners who believe his 15 targets were a product of Will Fuller's departure and the fact that the Texans' Week 4 game went into overtime. They would be right, but only to a point. First of all, 15 targets for any player is a massive total regardless of the circumstances and a pretty clear indication the quarterback and coaching staff have a ton of trust in the player. Second of all, Houston was manufacturing touches specifically to get him the ball, even before Fuller left. Yes, most of his production came after Fuller's final target of the game (nine of his 11 catches, 92 of his 109 yards), but it needs to be noted that he saw four targets in the roughly 18 or so minutes Fuller was still playing. The Texans gave him two running plays in addition to his 15 targets, meaning over 22 percent of the offensive touches for the game ended up in his hands or were intended to go to him. He was targeted on 28.6 percent of his 49 routes. Think about that for a second: a player making his NFL debut following a extended absence due to injury (he didn't play in the preseason either) is thrust into that kind of workload? That's not an accident. And yes, we've never seen this seen this kind of debut before.

Owners should put a high priority on acquiring Coutee's services for multiple reasons, but here's three of the better ones: 1) Fuller has been unable to stay healthy for any length of time during his two-plus year NFL career and Coutee is the next in line, 2) the Texans don't use their tight ends or running backs very often in the passing game and 3) Houston has desperately wanted someone to emerge in the slot for a number of years. I wouldn't go so far as to say Fuller's starting job is in jeopardy because he brings something very unique to the offense. It's also obvious he has an undeniable bond with Deshaun Watson, seeing as how he's scored at least one touchdown in every game he and Watson have started together. But if his durability continues to be an issue, it would not be surprising if HC Bill O'Brien makes the decision to cut back his snaps to increase his odds of staying healthy. Just to be clear, Coutee is not someone I'm endorsing to start right away (assuming Fuller plays), but he is someone I want to stash and start the moment Fuller is forced to miss time. And let's say Fuller makes it through the rest of the season healthy. Coutee played 69.4 percent of his snaps in Week 4 in the slot. As we have learned in recent years, heavy slot usage for a receiver is typically a good thing.

Although Case Keenum's overthrow late in the Monday night game against the Chiefs could have changed the outcome of the contest (and possibly the narrative of Demaryius Thomas' season), it is definitely time to start worrying about Thomas continuing his six-year streak of finishing among the top 16 fantasy receivers. Keenum has not been particularly good since the opener (and even then, he threw three interceptions), but Thomas' 8.4 yards per catch is about what owners expect from running backs. His 1.29 yards per route run per Pro Football Focus is tied with Danny Amendola and Donte Moncrief for 78th in the league among receivers. His 3.94 routes per target (12th-best among receivers who qualified for this list) suggests there is hope, but the quarterback play has to pick up if Denver is going to support more than one weekly starter at receiver.

It probably goes without saying, but I'll say it anyway: if owners are holding out hope for a receiver to either breakout or do more than they've been doing lately, make sure they are seeing a target at least once every six routes on average. Some of the players at the top of this list are to be expected - Laquon Treadwell, Paul Richardson and Torrey Smith, to name a few - but owners are flirting with danger if they are counting on Keelan Cole (6.86), Mike Williams (6.41) or Tyler Lockett (6.38) to play meaningful roles moving forward. This also means receivers such as Marvin Jones (6.21), Amari Cooper (5.96) and Kenny Stills (5.94) are going to be highly volatile. All hope should not be lost, however. Take Cooper for example. His two slow games came against a healthy Rams' secondary and shadow coverage against Miami's Xavien Howard, who is quickly emerging as one of the league's best corners. Another slow week could be on tap against Casey Heyward, but it appears as though we can begin trusting Cooper again in "winnable" matchups - which was obviously not the case in 2017. Cole is someone else I like, but the Jaguars are going to need to drop the committee approach at receiver. That doesn't look like it's happening anytime soon.

One notable omission from this list - due to a lack of targets per game - is Chris Hogan. If readers believe this is a fluke, there is evidence to suggest otherwise. No Patriot has run more routes than Hogan (137), yet he is being targeted once every 10.5 routes, which would be the worst mark on this list if he qualified. The general assumption might have been that the addition of Josh Gordon and return of Julian Edelman was going to free up Hogan to do damage downfield like he has in previous years, but Phillip Dorsett's work thus far (27 targets to Hogan's 13) and routes/target metrics (4.7 to Hogan's 10.5) suggest Hogan may struggle for fantasy relevancy if/when Gordon and Edelman get comfortable in the offense.

Wide Receivers | Tight Ends


Doug Orth has written for FF Today since 2006 and been featured in USA Today’s Fantasy Football Preview magazine since 2010. He hosted USA Today’s hour-long, pre-kickoff fantasy football internet chat every Sunday in 2012-13 and appears as a guest analyst on a number of national sports radio shows, including Sirius XM’s “Fantasy Drive”. Doug is also a member of the Fantasy Sports Writers Association.