Fantasy Football Today - fantasy football rankings, cheatsheets, and information
A Fantasy Football Community!




Create An Account  |  Advertise  |  Contact      






Mike Davis | Archive | Email |
Staff Writer


Should the New PAT Rule Affect Kicker Deductions?
Q & A: Week 2
9/17/15

Last Week’s Question: Are DFS contests “raking” a small percentage of traditional fantasy players out of their leagues?

In response to this query, one reader (Dan) quipped, “I don’t have time to answer your silly questions! I’m about to miss a deadline to submit my next DFS lineup.”

My question was dismissed in a more serious (though equally sarcastic) way by readers such as Shelby, who observed:

Every time there’s a new development, somebody has to become Chicken Little and claim the sky is falling. If Mike Davis thinks the rise of fantasy football is going to be the fall of fantasy football, then I think ‘Mike Davis’ must be Latin for Chicken Little.

Well, okay . . . but my claim wasn’t that traditional fantasy football will die because of the popularity of DFS contests. I just wanted to know if anyone else out there suspects that a significant number of 12-team leagues have lost at least one owner to DFS-related activities.

Although I didn’t get into this point in last week’s column, perhaps I should have mentioned that DFS solves one of the major problems in traditional leagues: the apathy/non-participation of owners who have been eliminated from playoff contention by Week 10 or so. Just look through the archives of this column to see how much effort commissioners have put into finding solutions (such as weekly high-score payouts, etc.) to make sure that the level of competitive engagement remains high through the end of the regular fantasy season for all owners. If your main problem with traditional FF is the way apathy taints competition at the end of the season, why wouldn’t you bolt for the greener pastures of DFS, where everyone is equally incentivized to put together the best possible lineup each week?

That was an argument I expected to hear from at least one reader, but that expectation was not met. In fact, I only received one response from someone who conceded that DFS activities were getting in the way of his traditional fantasy commitments. That person was Mike Krueger, the owner/editor of FFToday, who admitted: “I cut down my season-long league total from 13 last year to 8 this year for [the] sole purpose of focusing on daily.” Unfortunately for me, Krueger’s focus on traditional FF is still strong enough for him to have kicked my booty in the FF Staff League in Week 1.

I guess Krueger’s response may provide an indirect answer to my question. Since I happen to interact with FF journalists more than the average person, and since FF journalists are increasingly paying attention to DFS as a subject worth writing about, maybe it’s no surprise that as these folks shift their attention from traditional leagues to DFS activities, people like me get a disproportionate number of invitations to replace them in the leagues they leave behind. In other words, maybe my suspicion that DFS is siphoning some players from traditional leagues is true, but only for the people in my own circles—not for the general public.

This Week’s Question: Should the New PAT Rule Affect Kicker Deductions?

To understand the question I received from Jason, you need to know about the rule change for PATs in 2015. Some of you are sick of hearing about this change already, but anyone curious about the precise details involved will benefit from this article by Kevin Seifert. The upshot of the change, as Dan Hanzus points out in a more recent piece, is that we should expect more extra points to be missed this season than ever before—roughly ten times as many over the course of the season (up from 7.4 misses per season between 2010 and 2014 to a projected 70 misses in 2015 based on what we saw in Week 1).

The NFL rule change has the attention of the owners in Jason’s league:

We give kickers no deduction for missed field goals over 40 yards, a -1 deduction for missed field goals of 40 yards or less, and a -2 deduction for missed PATs. Since Ks only get 1 point for making a PAT, that penalty was supposed to be steep [when we instituted it] because misses were so rare. But with this new rule, I’m already getting complaints from owners about the -2 deduction. [Now that there’s nothing bizarre about missing PATs,] some owners think we should change the penalty to -1 for misses. I agree, but the season is already underway, and the rule is in place. What should we do?

If you have some advice for Jason, I look forward to hearing from you and possibly featuring your commentary in next week’s column.

Survivor Pool Picks - Week 2 (Courtesy of Matthew Schiff)

Trap Game: NY Jets at Indianapolis
This was the first time in three years that my Week 1 trap game prediction didn’t come true. If not for a gift pass interference call for the Cowboys, Eli Manning’s clock mismanagement in the last two minutes, and a stunning comeback by Tony Romo (who just happens to hold the most 4th quarter comebacks of any quarterback since 2006), many Survival Pool contestants might have been knocked out last week.

This week, I’m worried about a Colts team that looked rather shaky in Buffalo against a NY J-E-T-S, Jets, Jets, Jets team that is playing better than most expected because of the veteran leadership of Ryan Fitzpatrick and Brandon Marshall. The Jets are hardly a pushover, and the Indianapolis defense was picked apart by Tyrod Taylor, a fifth-year player who, before the 2015 season, had thrown only 35 passes and completed 18 of them for 199 yards. In last week’s game, he doubled his career production against a Colts defense that was 11th overall in total defense in 2014. Since T.Y. Hilton will be MIA for the next few weeks, Donte Moncrief and the aging Andre Johnson will be called upon to serve as Andrew Luck’s deadliest weapons for the Colts’ home opener. While oddsmakers have the home team winning by a touchdown, it may take some fourth quarter heroics for Luck to pull this one out. As such, I say AVOID this game that normally would be your lock of the week.

#3: Philadelphia over Dallas (1-0, Cin)
Those that have read my columns over the years know that I am a Giants fan. It therefore pains me to pick between two teams when I want to see both of them lose. However, this week Chip Kelly shouldn’t have to wait until the second half to get his Eagles on track, nor worry about coming up short in the last few minutes. With a shaky secondary and the absence of playmaker Dez Bryant (lost for 6-8 weeks with a broken foot), the task of winning on the road at hostile Lincoln Field will be extremely difficult for Dallas. Tony Romo will be hard-pressed to stretch the field and rely on multiple running backs against a team that will have the 2014 leading rusher and former Cowboy Demarco Murray picking its defense (still compromised by injuries and suspensions) apart. Barring some amazing heroics, or just some stupid team management, look for Philadelphia to even their record to 1-1 against their division foes as they set their sights on San Francisco and Super Bowl 50.

#2: Baltimore at Oakland (1-0 GB)
The Ravens went into Mile High and manhandled Peyton Manning—knocking him down, rushing his throws, and only losing the game in the second half because of an uncharacteristic interception thrown by Joe Flacco in the third quarter that put Denver on top for good. This week those same Ravens face Derek Carr, who is expected to return under center after suffering a bruised hand and will face this formidable defense in a game that should resemble last week’s loss to the Ravens’ division rival Bengals. While Latavius Murray is definitely an upgrade over Darren McFadden, he most likely will find few running lanes in spite of the season-ending injury to Terrell Suggs, the star of Baltimore’s defense. Take the Ravens in a game that Baltimore needs to keep pace with Cincinnati.


Ryan Tannehill
Image by Tilt Creative (Ty Schiff)

#1: Miami at Jacksonville (1-0 NE)
The last time the Dolphins went 2-0 was 2013—and they had high expectations that year. Unlike 2013, this year they will have to do it by winning their first two games on the road. Strong-armed quarterback Ryan Tannehill finally has enough weapons around him in Jarvis Landry, Jordan Cameron, Lamar Miller and rookie Davante Parker to give New England a run in what has become a very competitive AFC East division and shouldn’t have the letdown that occurred late that season. Jacksonville still is rebuilding after a 3-13 season, and Coach Gus Bradley needs to show improvement or risk being let go after three short seasons at the helm. Unfortunately for Bradley, the early schedule for 2015 is stacked against him. Second year quarterback Blake Bortles has improved steadily during his time in the NFL, but unlike Tannehill, he hardly has enough quality weapons to scare any team, let alone a Dolphins squad that is looking to make the playoffs. Unfortunately for Jacksonville fans, it looks like it will be one more week before the Jaguars face a team that isn’t a playoff contender (and get a legit chance for their first win in 2015). Take the Fins on the road in this battle of Florida, and think hard about using any team that plays the Jags early this season for your survival pool pick.


Mike Davis has been writing about fantasy football since 1999--and playing video games even longer than that. His latest novel (concerning a gamer who gets trapped inside Nethack after eating too many shrooms) can be found here.