Last Week's Question: Does your league
have post-season action for non-playoff teams?
The question above has come up repeatedly in this column, and
it usually produces answers like the ones that came in this week.
Noah summarized the main reason for keeping non-playoff teams
engaged as well as a standard method of incentivizing engagement:
Every league I've ever done has a consolation bracket. In the
league I commish I started paying out the winner of it with half
their money back. There were a few unhappy about it but didn't
hear much past the draft. I've found that it keeps the teams that
are out of it involved. Just last week the guy tied for last traded
for Melvin Gordon with the express purpose of wining it. I've
also found that once teams are out of it this becomes their goal
and they appear to be taking it seriously. I did it because while
I have only been in a consolation bracket twice and I always take
every week seriously, not all [fantasy owners do]. I feel when
there is no reward, people give up at the end of the year and
don't [bother setting] their lineups. This can affect the playoff
picture if they play teams that are in it. I hated this with a
passion, so I decided to try and get rid of the problem. In my
other league I don't commish we've already run into the issue
with about three teams that have thrown in the towel. They've
tried to trade their best player for nothing to friends or of
course not set their lineup. There are only two games separating
6th to first and one game separating 5th to 10th with 14 teams
involved. A few weeks ago it was a 7 way tie for second, so as
you can see it's a tight race and every week matters. All these
reasons and more are why you should keep the teams out of it involved
and motivated.
Mr. Squeeze's league takes a slightly different approach that
might appeal to those who might find a total-points formula more
appealing:
I commish a 14 team league,and 8 of them make it to the playoffs.
The other 6
teams all play in our Toilet Bowl, which is three weeks long.
The 6 teams submit a starting lineup as usual, but they don't
play a match, instead their teams total points for the entire
three weeks earns the highest scoring team half off the next years
entry fee into the league. This has kept the teams owners more
interested, and everybody puts their best foot forward. The Toilet
Bowl teams are allowed to add/drop players, but their priority
falls to below the teams in the regular fantasy playoffs. The
only drawback is that going into the third and final week there
is a team in front, and a couple of teams way out back, so it
becomes a two or three horse race.
Returning the yearly entry fee (or a portion of it) to the winner
of the consolation bracket is, as both readers suggest, an easy
way to keep owners interested beyond the point when they might
otherwise check out. SonOfaBolt recommends using this strategy
in addition to a weekly payout to the highest scoring team to
keep all owners active.
But there are other incentives that don't have to impact the purse
awarded to the league champion. In GMHoya's league, for example,
the order of finish in the consolation. Craig finds this approach
especially effective in keeper leagues:
It encourages people to keep trying to win because you want to
get that #1 pick in the draft. Especially because we are a keeper
league and the top 20 guys are usually gone anyway. For example,
I barely missed the winners bracket last year and won the [consolation
tourney]. I picked first and was able to get Zeke with the first
pick. That means I essentially got Zeke in the 3rd round. That’s
good value and provided excellent incentive for me to keep trying
to win.
I'm grateful to all the readers who took the trouble to write
in with their suggestions, including those whose comments I was
unable to include because they overlapped too much with the ones
I've excerpted. But I'm especially grateful to Jeremy for being
honest enough to admit that payouts for "weekly winners [don't
always] keep interest alive from the bottom teams." Commissioners
who aren't getting the results they seek from conventional incentives
(whether they take the form of money or draft picks) may want
to adapt Jeremy's approach to their own circumstances:
This year I finally stripped out [payouts for high scores] and
can use all that savings to enhance the winning prize pots with
"the Cinderella rule," [which puts] the hot team from
the bottom into the playoffs. How it works is all the teams that
don’t make the playoffs and the team in the last playoff
spot as of week 13 (the last week of our regular season), compete
to score the most points from week 11-13. The team with the most
points out of that group gets the final playoff spot. Right now,
everyone in the league is still alive and it’s week 11,
I don’t think I’ve ever been able to say that before.
I'm still receiving mixed reviews from the league members about
it, but I'm loving it.
Thanks for the idea, Jeremy. Since this is your first year to
try it, I hope to hear from you again if anything unexpected happens
as a consequence of implementing this new rule.
Next Week's Question: Do you prefer
deep rosters, IR tags, or neither?
I'm in a league with a fairly shallow bench (14 roster spots for
8 starters) but unlimited IR spots for players listed as "out"
on the NFL injury report. Apart from a nominal $2 transaction
fee, there was zero downside to carrying Watkins all this time
because of the way IR works in that league. But I suppose there
are plenty of leagues with deep enough benches that dedicating
a roster spot to Watkins all season would have been painless as
well.
So my specific question is this: In a league with 8 starters,
how deep would your bench have to be for you to have justified
carrying Watkins all this time. (Your answer will carry more weight
if you really have kept him on your squad all season in a league
without IR spots.)
My more general question is this: Do you prefer deep benches, IR
tags, or neither—and why? Please email
your preferences to me or respond in the comments section below.
Survivor Pool Picks - Week 12 (Courtesy
of Matthew Schiff)
Happy Thanksgiving to all those readers who check out this column
to help make your survival pool picks each week. While I so desperately
wanted to put one of the Turkey Day games in my picks this week,
these games are just too close to choose any of them for something
so important.
#3: N.Y. Giants at Cleveland: (8-3, JAX, OAK,
DAL, MIN, PIT, NE, CIN, TN, GB, AZ, DET)
Until Cleveland wins, you just play the odds. In fact, if you
play weekly fantasy games, this may be the week to put the three-headed
monster in of Manning, Jennings and Beckham in your lineup. It
has worked two of the last three weeks. The Browns are 31st in
total points allowed, 31st in total yards allowed, and in the
last three weeks they have given up an average of 28 points per
game while scoring only 9. Look for this trend to continue against
a much improved Giants defense.
#2: Buffalo over Jacksonville: (9-2, HOU, AZ,
CAR, WAS, GB, TN, NE, MN, SEA, NYG, PIT)
Late season, winter weather games make for very interesting survival
pool choices. Any player who normally likes playing at home in
60 degree weather is not going to enjoy a trip to Buffalo in late
November where the forecast is a balmy 42. More importantly, the
Jaguars defense has given up the more rushing yards than 80 percent
of the league. This statistic should fall right into Buffalo’s
rush first philosophy. Once that Bills get a lead, Rex Ryan and
his defense will then blitz Bortles into turnovers that will only
make this game more lopsided. There’s a trend here people.
#1: New Orleans over the Lams (I Mean Rams):
(10-1, SEA, CAR, MIA, CIN, NE, PIT, GB, DEN, DAL, BAL, NYG)
Los Angeles is a team that is trying to find its identity both
geographically as well as on the field. Last year’s rookie
sensation, Todd Gurley, is having a sophomore headache and the
coaching staff made a change at quarterback to first round draft
pick Jared Goff. Last week, Goff was playing with training wheels
on. He hardly made any mistakes, but his performance reeked of
a “not to lose”, instead of I know how to win attitude.
Make no mistake, both of these future stars should have a terrific
2017 season. In the meantime, we should see flashes in this game,
but not enough to keep pace with Drew Brees who has finally got
his offense going in the Bayou.
Mike Davis has been writing about
fantasy football since 1999--and playing video games even longer
than that. His latest novel (concerning a gamer who gets trapped
inside Nethack after eating too many shrooms) can
be found here.