One of the toughest challenges in drafting a fantasy football team
is deciding between two players who seem to offer nearly identical
value. Knowing how to break this tie is crucial, as many picks ultimately
come down to a choice between Player A and Player B. This article
aims to not only highlight pairs of players with similar value for
the 2025 season but also to explore strategies for resolving these
tricky dilemmas.
In the final installment of our three-part series, we’re
turning the spotlight on the running back position. Today’s
comparison: Kyren Williams vs. Bucky Irving -- two young
backs entering their prime and looking to secure big second contracts
through high-end production.
Kyren Williams
was not on many people's radars entering the 2023 season after
carrying the ball 35 times for less than 4 yards per carry as
a rookie in 2022. However, he exploded in 2023 and then continued
high-end productivity in 2024. Bucky
Irving, meanwhile, was supposed to be a complementary back
to Rachaad White
in Tampa last season, but emerged as the primary threat out of
the backfield by the second half. Now, both Williams and Irving
stand to be low-end RB1s for fantasy purposes or outstanding RB2s.
But, which is the better option? Let's dig in.
The Strengths:
Kyren has a knack for finding the end zone -- scoring 31 touchdowns
over the past two seasons despite missing six games. That's elite
company. Under Sean McVay's system -- the same one that helped
Todd Gurley rack up 54 TDs from 2017-2019 -- Williams now plays
the "Gurley role." His per-game production is right in line with
that, minus Gurley's edge as a receiver.
To put it in perspective: Williams has averaged more than one
touchdown per game over his last 28 games. That puts him in rare
air. Only Jahmyr Gibbs has matched his 31 TDs over the last two
years, and Gibbs needed four more games to get there. So, on a
per-game basis, Williams is the most efficient scoring RB in fantasy
football. It begs the question -- why isn't he a surefire
first-round pick in redraft formats? (More on that later.)
Bucky entered last season expected to complement Rachaad
White in Tampa Bay. Instead, he took over the backfield by midseason
and never looked back.
Irving finished with just 207 carries -- but made the most of
them, averaging 5.4 yards per carry, fourth in the NFL behind
Derrick Henry,
Saquon Barkley,
and Gibbs. He posted over 1,500 total yards, including more than
1,100 rushing yards, despite sharing touches early in the season.
The Buccaneers' offense is now too balanced to stack the
box against, especially with rookie standout Emeka Egbuka adding
to their already deep WR room. Irving averaged 18 carries per
game over the final four weeks of the season. If that trend holds,
he's on pace for nearly 100 more carries -- and potentially
over 500 additional rushing yards -- in 2025. That's
a massive ceiling for a back who's clearly more efficient
than his backfield competition.
The Weaknesses:
Let's return to that yards-per-carry stat. Williams averaged
just 4.1 YPC in 2024, nearly a full yard lower than his 2023 number
-- and well below Irving's 5.4. Even though Williams
handled 109 more carries than Irving, he only gained 177 more
rushing yards.
Sure, he's durable and trusted with volume, but he wasn't
especially explosive with those extra carries. In fact, Williams
had five games last season with 21+ carries where he didn't
reach 100 yards. His scoring keeps his floor high -- making
him a safe RB2 -- but RB1s usually bring more efficiency.
When it comes to ceiling, Irving may have the edge.
On the flip side, Irving's passing game involvement is a concern.
While he's flashed playmaking ability, he didn't score
a single receiving TD last year -- while Rachaad White had
six. White has averaged 55 receptions per year through his career
and is clearly the more trusted receiving back in Tampa.
That likely limits Irving's third-down upside. Meanwhile,
Kyren Williams faces virtually no backfield competition --
Blake Corum's 3.6 YPC and 8 targets last year don't
scream "threat." White's continued presence
does limit Irving to some extent, even if not dramatically.
The Verdict:
So, what’s more valuable to your team: a touchdown-dependent
grinder with locked-in usage (Williams), or a high-efficiency
runner with room to grow and a slightly more diverse skillset
(Irving)?
Williams likely maintains a touchdown advantage, but Irving should
be able to crack double-digit TDs in 2025 -- especially if
he continues seeing 15+ carries per game. While neither back is
a pass-catching monster, Irving was more productive than Williams
through the air last season, despite splitting time with a target-hogging
teammate.
To be clear, Williams did lead the Rams' RBs in targets by a
wide margin -- but he ranked just 38th among RBs in overall
targets. That’s largely due to the Rams’ offensive
design, which funnels most passes to wide receivers. And with
no changes to the QB or scheme this offseason, we can expect more
of the same.
Bottom line:
In PPR or half-PPR formats, Irving is the preferred pick,
offering better yardage upside and more potential in the passing
game.
In standard formats, it’s closer -- and Williams'
nose for the end zone makes him a strong option who’s
hard to pass up.
If you’re drafting early and going WR-heavy, grabbing both
at the 2/3 turn could be a league-winning move.
"Feet to the fire," we're giving the slight edge
to Bucky Irving based on upside, efficiency, and receiving involvement
-- but it's close, and both backs are strong picks
depending on build and format.