Bye Weeks: Arizona, Cleveland, Green Bay, Washington
Grab a Helmet
Chris
Johnson @ MIA: He was well on his way to a snooze-worthy outing
against the Bears last Sunday, his first in several weeks, when
– with about 10 minutes to go in Chicago’s 50-21 romp – he struck
for one of those patented one-play scoring drives, an 80-yard
sprint to the house. Almost instantly, Johnson’s performance went
from prosaic to profound. His well-documented struggles notwithstanding,
there are still very few runners in the league who can turn chicken
scat into chicken salad the way he can. He’s a true home-run hitter
and, 80-yard touchdown jaunts being the NFL’s equivalent of grand
slams, a guy who can change fantasy matchups in a hurry. That
was actually his second such blast in the last three weeks, a
pretty solid indication the man we once called CJ2K may be regaining
his form. I wouldn’t have liked this matchup with Miami four weeks
ago but Johnson has gotten better and the Miami front seemingly
worse since then. Get him in there and hope the uptick continues.
Vick
Ballard @ JAX: Ballard is actually the latest back to have
faced the Fish and he was surprisingly effective in that matchup,
tallying just shy of 100 yards on 19 total touches in the Colts’
nail-biting 23-20 Week 9 victory at Lucas Oil Stadium. The Mississippi
St. product has only warning track power compared to Chris Johnson
(his longest career run is a mere 26 yards) but he always seems
to gain positive yards and is a fairly effective pass-catching
option for Indy’s high-powered passing attack. That’s a good thing
because it means he’ll stay on the field come passing downs…and
there are plenty of those in a Bruce Arians-led offense. Ballard
will also be garnering most of the rushing opportunities for Indy
(Donald Brown is still on the mend, apparently), so I think it’s
safe to call him one of the better plays for Week 10. Start the
rook against Jacksonville’s suspect defense (25.3 average points
yielded to opposing RBs).
Stevan Ridley: Leader of the three-headed
monster.
Stevan
Ridley, Danny
Woodhead, or Shane
Vereen v. BUF: Before you start firing off those nasty
emails…no, I’m not suggesting these guys are interchangeable. Obviously,
Ridley is the back to own of the three, provided you’re willing
to employ a ball carrier who plays for the game’s most unpredictable
(read: maddening) coach, Bill Belichick. That unpredictability,
however, is precisely what makes guys like Woodhead and Vereen,
ostensible backups, somewhat relevant and occasionally even more
so. Think back to Week 4 when the Pats had TWO 100-yard backs (Ridley
and Brandon Bolden) and another (Woodhead) who scored a receiving
touchdown. If you’re counting at home, that’s three backs on one
team north of 8 fantasy points in one game. New England’s opponent
that day? Yup, you guessed it: Buffalo. I think Ridley’s a lock
for triple digits and a score or two. It wouldn’t surprise me at
all, though, to see either Woodhead or Vereen (or both) throw up
some solid numbers, as well. If you need serious help on this penultimate
week of byes, give them both a look.
Grab a Gatorade
Ryan
Mathews @ TB: Mathews has been one of the bigger disappointments
at the running back position this year, primarily because he missed
the first two games of the season and was, thus, never likely
to regain the elite status he achieved last year. It’s worse than
that, though. On a per game basis, he’s only the 22nd best running
back to date. Indeed, his 10.8 points per contest put him behind
the aforementioned Chris Johnson (somewhat understandable), Michael
Turner (barely understandable), and Shonn Greene (not in the least
bit understandable). What’s wrong with the former Fresno St. stud,
you ask? Well, the Chargers’ offense in general, and Philip Rivers
in particular, have been suffering through a season-long malaise.
Additionally, Mathews’ chronic fumbling problem and his proneness
to injury seem to have motivated Norv Turner to utilize other
running back resources on the squad more frequently, namely Ronnie
Brown of late. You probably won’t sit him but bear in mind he’s
been underperforming and now draws a Tampa defense that is flat
stuffing opposing rock-toters (3.4 yards/attempt and 77.3 yards/game,
best in the league in both categories).
Matt
Forte v. HOU: Forte’s numbers have dipped a bit since last
year, as well (12.8 points/game v. 14.4 in 2011) but he’s been
pretty steady for the most part and has handled the slight workload
reduction and partial job share with apparent grace. Actually,
the addition of Michael Bush may render Forte more valuable down
the stretch as he’s less likely to get injured the fewer touches
he receives. And by “more valuable,” I of course mean “at all
valuable.” He missed everything after Week 13 last season with
a balky knee. Unfortunately, in order to get to Week 13 (and beyond),
one has to actually make it to the fantasy playoffs. That could
be much more difficult if Forte struggles against the Texans’
stellar stop unit this Sunday night. They’re surrendering just
11.7 fantasy points/game to opposing backs and have still yet
to give up a single rushing touchdown on the season. I’d bet a
pretty good chunk Forte won’t be the guy to break that spell.
Jamaal
Charles @ PIT: Charles seems to have survived the vicious
blow delivered last Thursday night by San Diego linebacker, Donald
Butler, and will likely be back in the starting lineup for the
Chiefs on Monday night. That doesn’t mean he should be back
in yours, however. Since an explosive three-week stretch in the
early going (560 total yards and three scores from Weeks 3 to
5), he’s effectively disappeared, averaging a trivial 41
total yards/game in his last three tilts. He also hasn’t
scored recently. It would be tempting to think the competition
has stiffened since that productive stretch but he posted those
numbers against San Diego (tough), Baltimore (tough), and New
Orleans (gooey soft). Since then, he’s faced San Diego again
(still tough), Tampa (really tough), and Oakland (they just gave
up 272 total yards to Doug Martin). I don’t like him at
this juncture and certainly not against a newly steeled Curtain
on primetime TV.
Wide Receivers
|