The Contest - Part 4
11/6/07
Every industry has experts; those sages that dispense wisdom
and truth from atop the mountain. In philosophy these learned men
wear long, flowing robes and an equally lengthy beard is required.
In fantasy football, a backwards ball cap, clipboard of notes, and
half empty bottle of Coors Light is more likely. But are these guys
truly experts? Do they know any better than the rest of us schmucks?
Each week Analyzing the Experts will take aim at one or more of
these so-called oracles and find out…
This is the fourth article in our quest to crown one lucky fantasy
football expert as champion of the First Annual Analyzing the
Experts Competition.
Thus Far
Despite getting off to a slow start, our experts came alive last
week with our first perfect projection, courtesy of RotoWorld.
A divide is beginning to open up as the been comparing the rankings
from a handful of writers, applying them to a real (if very sad)
team, and then analyzing the results. While this study will generate
a limited amount of data, it should give us a fairly good idea
if these guys know anything more than the rest of us and, if so,
which ones are worth listening to.
Guys who have a clue are separating from the pack. Will they
continue to excel? Or has luck been the determining factor, making
the leaders likely to find themselves back in the pack very soon?
I have faith that at least a couple of the experts truly are what
they claim to be, so I am holding out hope, if somewhat cynically.
Through three weeks, here is the experts’ projection accuracy:
RotoWorld: 75.0%
FFToday: 66.7%
ESPN:
66.7%
Yahoo! 66.7%
Starters 62.5%
FoxSports: 58.3%
The Team
II continued tweaking the roster, just like any other fantasy
owner, trying to find talent and success where there was none.
Byes were killing the team at the wide receiver position, so I
had to drop Feely for Berrian. That left me only a single kicker,
again giving the experts a free pass with one of their picks,
but I am still trying to win if at all possible! I also let Jones
swim back out to the free agent pool in exchange for Keith. With
the running backs I have, JJ was never going to start. Keith probably
won’t either, but his upside is greater if Addai goes down
with an injury. We have a limit of six backs on a roster, so it
was one or the other. I also swapped out a poor New Orleans defense
for a much more interesting Green Bay unit.
Dropped: Jay Feely - Signed: Bernard Berrian
Dropped: Julius Jones - Signed: Kenton Keith
Dropped: Saints Defense - Signed: Packers Defense
So the team looks like this for Week 8:
My Team |
QB |
RB |
WR |
TE |
K |
DEF |
Jon Kitna
Derek Anderson |
Steven Jackson
LaMont Jordan
Clinton Portis
Travis Henry
Kenton Keith
Selvin Young
|
Torry Holt
Larry Fitzgerald
Dwayne Bowe
Patrick Crayton
Bernard Berrian
|
Todd Heap
Eric Johnson |
Jeff Reed
|
Green Bay Packers
Houston Texans
|
|
A starting lineup consists of 1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 1 K, and
1 Def, or eight starters and ten bench players.
The Predictions |
|
ESPN |
Yahoo! |
Rotoworld |
Fox Sports |
FFToday |
Starters |
QB |
Anderson |
Anderson |
Anderson |
Anderson |
Anderson |
Anderson |
RB1 |
Jackson |
Jackson |
Jackson |
Jackson |
Jordan |
Jackson |
RB2 |
Portis |
Henry |
Portis |
Young |
Portis |
Portis |
WR1 |
Holt |
Holt |
Holt |
Holt |
Holt |
Holt |
WR2 |
Berrian |
Berrian |
Berrian |
Berrian |
Berrian |
Berrian |
TE |
Johnson |
Johnson |
Johnson |
Johnson |
Johnson |
Johnson |
K |
Reed |
Reed |
Reed |
Reed |
Reed |
Reed |
Def |
Packers |
Packers |
Packers |
Packers |
---- |
Packers |
|
These start recommendations were all taken from the experts’
published fantasy football player rankings for Week Eight. The
names in blue were the most advantageous picks for the team.
I can’t wait until the byes are over. Because of those
scheduled weeks off and our league’s small roster size,
we only had Holt and Berrian playing Week 8 in the receiver position
while Johnson was our only choice at tight end. Since we had to
pick up Berrian to have two warm bodies at wide out, Reed was
our only kicker. So our experts had a couple choices at defense
and quarterback, and a number of options at running back. Everyone
liked Anderson at QB and Green Bay as their starting defense.
I can’t blame them as I chose the same guys. Running back
was a little more open to differing projections with Jackson being
the odds on favorite and Portis, Henry, Young, and Jordan getting
some votes.
The Results
The best lineup I could have put on the field in Week Eight would
have been:
Derek Anderson
Selvin Young
Steven Jackson
Torry Holt
Bernard Berrian
Eric Johnson
Jeff Reed
Packers Defense
Wow! Time for me to start eating my very long-winded, words.
Roger Rotter at FoxSports came through with our second perfect
projection. There wasn’t tons of intrigue this week. As
happens to many owners, this was my one rough bye week and poor
planning on my part didn’t help. I should have looked ahead
a little better and started adjusting my roster accordingly. I
actually managed another win this week (current record is 5-3),
so it wasn’t too horrible. I was somewhat surprised at how
far Derek Anderson has come to have him listed as a top five quarterback
in many of these rankings. A nice match up helps of course, but
he was above the veteran Kitna in everyone’s book. Jackson’s
high ranking was certainly about the match up as well. No one
who has watched a Rams game this year can think much of the train
wreck they call an offense in St. Louis.
All of this led to another excellent outing for our experts.
They have two more weeks of byes making their lives easier before
they have to suck it up and play hardball with a full 18-man roster.
Here are the rankings for this week:
FoxSports 100%
Starters 87.5%
RotoWorld 87.5%
ESPN 87.5%
Yahoo! 87.5%
FFToday 71.4%
The big move this week was by FoxSports. They went from worst
to first; not bad at all. Has all my heckling provided some motivation?
Or maybe he just got lucky? That’s why we do this for ten
full weeks, to separate the luck from skill, if there is any.
RotoWorld and ESPN continue to be consistently at the top of the
rankings week in and week out while FFToday had a rough week.
I knew not picking a defense would eventually catch up with them.
It was a slam-dunk of a pick this week.
After four weeks, we have the following:
First Annual Analyzing the Experts Competition
Official Standings
- RotoWorld 78.1%
- ESPN 71.9%
- Yahoo! 71.9%
- Starters 68.8%
- FoxSports 68.8%
- FFToday 67.9%
Conclusions
Every expert improved their projection percentages this week,
some significantly more than others. FoxSports had the only perfect
picks and closed the gap with the rest of the pack very quickly.
FFToday, being incorrect on both running back picks and not selecting
at the defense position, improved modestly enough to get overtaken
by many of its competitors. There is only a 4% difference between
2nd and last place, so no one is distinguishing them selves thus
far, with the exception of RotoWorld. We will see if they can
keep it up and also find out if FoxSports cannot suck for two
weeks in a row.
The data keeps rolling in for positional success. Byes and injuries
may confuse the situation a little, but I expect that by Week
10 we will see some clear trends. So far, this is how our experts
have performed in making correct selections by position:
- QB: 75%
- RB: 71%
- WR: 75%
- TE: 54%
- K: 79%
- Def: 70%
Other than the statistical issues caused by Heap’s injury
woes, every other position has been equally challenging for our
experts. I expect that these percentages will begin diverging
in a couple more weeks as we get more data and our experts get
more chances to screw up as bye weeks end.
With four weeks down and six to go, RotoWorld is trying to build
a lead. At this point any advantage is hardly insurmountable;
RotoWorld has been a scant two picks better than their nearest
competitors. In a single week any of these experts could vault
into the lead. It is curious that there is not a big difference
between our experts or me playing “Average Joe” and
picking my own starters. These guys had better continue putting
up excellent weeks if they want to prove they are really the experts
they claim to be.
|