The Contest - Part 6
11/26/07
Every industry has experts; those sages that dispense wisdom
and truth from atop the mountain. In philosophy these learned men
wear long, flowing robes and an equally lengthy beard is required.
In fantasy football, a backwards ball cap, clipboard of notes, and
half empty bottle of Coors Light is more likely. But are these guys
truly experts? Do they know any better than the rest of us schmucks?
Each week Analyzing the Experts will take aim at one or more of
these so-called oracles and find out…
I have received a bunch of emails asking me what will be different
with next year’s competition. Not to get ahead of myself,
as we still have a heated contest to complete over the next few
weeks, but readers are offering many great ideas and I’ve
mulled over a couple less impressive ones myself. Expect a larger
team (to give better statistical results) and more experts (increasing
the number of clowns to pick on) as a start. I am still playing
around with some of the other tweaks and accepting helpful suggestions.
So, if you have ideas about which experts should be invited to participate,
however unwillingly, or anything else that would make the next Analyzing
the Experts Competition even more relevant and interesting, fire
away by all means.
However, we still have a race to run this season and our experts
are deep into the thick of it. RotoWorld has a slight lead while
FFToday and others are closing in. The lack of differentiation
among our experts is startling as all are separated by a very
thin margin. A number of readers have emailed me saying they will
be basing their future picks on our results and I say, “Go
to it, with reservations”. So far, no one has proven they
are much better than anyone else and, given the small sample team
we are using, I wouldn’t want to place the fate of my fantasy
team in the hands of an “expert” just because he has
done well so far. The perfect example of this would be Roger Rotter
at FoxSports. When I reviewed his selections earlier in the season,
they blew and I made sure everyone knew how badly they sucked.
Yet, during this contest, his results have been decent, if erratic.
Did he have a bad week when I looked at him earlier? That is quite
possible. Or, is he just another clueless expert who has gotten
lucky so far?
Our rankings for the First Annual Analyzing the Experts Competition
after six of our ten weeks are:
RotoWorld: 75.0%
FFToday: 70.0%
ESPN:
68.8%
FoxSports: 68.8%
Yahoo! 66.7%
Starters 64.6%
Now let’s see how they did this week, which corresponds to
NFL Week 11
The Team
I made no transactions this week. With a
nice winning streak under my belt, I took the easy way out and
said everything was good. While there are some decent running
backs available in our very shallow league, I just can’t
bring myself to drop LaMont Jordan, Patrick Crayton, or Roddy
White. Stupid – yes, as Jordan should be long gone. He looked
so good earlier this season I don’t know if swapping him
out for a Fred Taylor-type guy is worthwhile. In the mental ward
known as the Raiders organization, anything can happen other than
success.
My Team |
QB |
RB |
WR |
TE |
K |
DEF |
Jon Kitna
Derek Anderson |
Steven Jackson
LaMont Jordan
Clinton Portis
Travis Henry
Selvin Young
|
Torry Holt
Larry Fitzgerald
Dwayne Bowe
Patrick Crayton
Roddy White
|
Todd Heap
Eric Johnson |
Jeff Reed
Josh Brown |
Green Bay Packers
Detroit Lions
|
|
A starting lineup consists of 1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 1 K, and
1 Def, or eight starters and ten bench players.
The Predictions |
|
ESPN |
Yahoo! |
Rotoworld |
Fox Sports |
FFToday |
Starters |
QB |
Anderson |
Anderson |
Anderson |
Anderson |
Kitna |
Anderson |
RB1 |
Portis |
Portis |
Portis |
Young |
Portis |
Portis |
RB2 |
Jackson |
Jackson |
Jackson |
Jackson |
Jackson |
Jackson |
WR1 |
Fitzgerald |
Fitzgerald |
Fitzgerald |
Fitzgerald |
Fitzgerald |
Fitzgerald |
WR2 |
Holt |
Holt |
Holt |
Holt |
Holt |
Holt |
TE |
Johnson |
Johnson |
Johnson |
Johnson |
Johnson |
Johnson |
K |
Reed |
Reed |
Brown |
Reed |
Reed |
Reed |
Def |
Packers |
Packers |
Packers |
Packers |
---- |
Packers |
|
These start recommendations were all taken from the experts’
published fantasy football player rankings for Week
Eleven. The highlighted names were the most advantageous picks
for the team.
Amazingly, with 18 players to choose from, our experts projected
almost identical line ups. RotoWorld, FoxSports, and FFToday each
changed out a single player from the standard while ESPN, Yahoo!,
and my Starters sported the exact same picks. With this kind of
consensus, I expect the numbers for the week to be astounding.
This many “experts” can’t all be wrong, can
they?
Fantasy owners who look over a single site’s rankings and
set their line up accordingly need to recognize a couple things.
First, if you ever get a chance to review multiple recommendations
over the course of numerous weeks, as I have this year, you will
find some lists are almost identical every single week. This week
in particular I could have swapped out some of these experts recommendation
lists and no one would have known the difference. They were almost
identical and not just for our players, but across the board.
Alternatively, some rankings tend to get off the beaten path
more often than others. I group FFToday and, surprisingly, FoxSports
in this group. Being different just for the sake of uniqueness
doesn’t help owners at all, but it is important to find
an expert who isn’t afraid to stand out from the crowd.
Of course, that chutzpah intrigues me, whereas it may be more
risky than other owners would enjoy. RotoWorld, by the way, falls
somewhere in the middle.
The Results
The best lineup I could have put on the field in Week Eleven
would have been:
- Jon Kitna
- Steven Jackson
- Selvin Young
- Larry Fitzgerald
- Dwayne Bowe
- Eric Johnson
- Josh Brown
- Packers Defense
Jon Kitna narrowly beat out Derek Anderson while Selvin Young
eclipsed Clinton Portis and Steven Jackson continued to roll.
Travis Henry and LaMont Jordan enjoyed the view from the sidelines.
God, I hate the Raiders. Larry Fitzgerald was the right pick here
and rookie Dwayne Bowe barely squeaked by Torry Holt. Roddy White
and Patrick Crayton were invisible this week, particularly on
the stat sheet. Todd Heap sat out another one and our experts
have finally learned to assume he will miss games until he is
seen on the field when it counts. Josh Brown scored a couple more
points than Jeff Reed and the Packers dominated on defense.
This was freaking ugly. With all our experts on the same page,
I would have thought some good numbers would be in order. I guess
not. In their defense, many of the best starters were determined
by only a handful of points. However, just like in the real games,
being close doesn’t earn a win. Interestingly, the three
experts that deviated from the status quo were rewarded while
the herd held their collective heads in shame.
Here are the contestant success rates for Week Seven of our contest:
- RotoWorld 62.5%
- FFToday 62.5%
- FoxSports 62.5%
- Starters 50.0%
- ESPN 50.0%
- Yahoo! 50.0%
What a depressing week for anyone following the advice of our
contestants. When the best any of them can do is five out of eight
picks, this far into the season where most of the surprises have
already worked their way through the system, it calls into serious
doubt whatever value they bring to the table. I could almost throw
darts at my roster (and how often I have wanted to toss sharp
objects at Jordan and Henry) and done as well, as evidenced by
the Average Joe Starters.
After seven weeks, the official King of the Experts standings
are:
First Annual Analyzing the Experts
Competition Official Standings
- RotoWorld 73.2%
- FFToday 68.9%
- FoxSports 67.9%
- ESPN 66.1%
- Yahoo! 64.3%
- Starters 62.5%
Conclusions
No one did much of anything in a week where someone desperately
needed to make a move on RotoWorld. All of our contestants are
doing better than the Starters, but not by much and the bottom
guys continue to slowly slide further behind the leaders. Yahoo!,
sucking wind at the back of the pack, needs to make up five picks
on RotoWorld to pull even. That will be a challenging task with
only three weeks remaining. FFToday and FoxSports are in a position
to take the lead with a single good week while ESPN has an outside
chance of getting to the top. Considering how consistent RotoWorld
has been, our challengers need to put it all together as we hit
crunch time.
Positional Success Rates
Team personnel continues to dominate any other factors as our
contestants strive to optimize my line up. Anderson versus Kitna
is a toss up and no one has managed to get a good handle on it
yet.
QB: 50%
RB: 68%
WR: 74%
TE: 60%
K: 64%
Def: 80%
Final Thoughts
A disappointing week for everyone involved this time. When half
of the contestants grade out at 50%, no one deserves to be crowned
King of the Experts. With a full roster, no bye weeks, and few
injuries, our experts have looked pretty mundane, if not a little
below average. The top guys continue to build their lead, while
the rest will have a tough climb to get back into the race. Hopefully,
next week provides some good picks and reason for optimism. I
am still holding out hope that someone will prove why I should
be listening to them, but it hasn’t happened yet.
|