NFC South & NFC West Breakdowns
8/18/09
NFC South: ATL
| CAR | NO | TB
NFC West: ARI
| STL | SF | SEA
With the offseason now a distant memory, I feel compelled to perform
my due diligence and encourage each of you to take in as much preseason
action as possible - something that has become more possible than
I could have ever imagined since the NFL Network will show all 65
games over the next four weeks. No, I’m not a sucker for “meaningless”
football; I have learned over the years to enter each exhibition
contest with a plan. In some games, I want to know if/when and where
a team is pulling its feature back. In others, I want to see if
a rookie WR looks crisp going in and coming out of his breaks and
if a veteran RB coming off an injury appears to have the same burst
he had pre-injury. Sometimes, I may go into a preseason game with
an eye towards the defense, for instance, how well a certain team
is transitioning from a 4-3 to a 3-4 defense.
Just like any coach, I tend to believe the preseason is the time
to seek evidence to back up the opinions we formed on players
during the offseason and, over the course of the next few weeks,
finalize decisions about a player's ability to help our fantasy
teams for the upcoming season. Like many other fantasy owners,
I am primarily interested in Week 3 of the preseason (which most
teams treat as a dress rehearsal for Opening Week, making it the
most realistic barometer of a team before the start of the actual
regular season). That doesn't mean that every other exhibition
is useless and, as such, I plan to take in every single preseason
game I can. Another benefit of embracing the preseason is taking
stock in some of the deep sleepers or potential fantasy wildcards.
For example, Bernard
Scott, James
Davis and Danny
Ware may mean very little to 95% of owners out there right
now, but I bet most of those same owners will be the ones kicking
themselves for not watching those young bucks in August if Cedric
Benson, Jamal Lewis and Brandon Jacobs succumbs to a season-ending
injury early in the season.
By now, each of you knows the drill as it relates to the PSA
breakdowns. While this week ends our month-long tour of each division
and how the schedule affects each team inside it, the next two
weeks will be focused on getting everyone as prepared as humanly
possible for all their late-August and early-September drafts
with the release of my PPR and non-PPR "Big Boards".
As for this article, once again, bear in mind that while the
final projections are important, they are 15-game totals because
most fantasy seasons have 15 games. For those unfamiliar with
the way I project player stats and individual week-to-week consistency
(or for those who need a refresher), please give PSA:
RB article a read for an introductory course in Preseason
Schedule Analysis. By now, I'm hoping that each of you have a
pretty good understanding of my methodology, so let's see how
the NFC South and NFC West shake down in 2009.
Note: The grey
highlight in each team’s schedule reflects a road game.
NFC SOUTH
Atlanta Falcons |
|
Totals |
MIA |
CAR |
NE |
bye |
SF |
CHI |
DAL |
NO |
WAS |
CAR |
NYG |
TB |
PHI |
NO |
NYJ |
BUF |
(Run) |
|
4.3 |
4.4 |
3.9 |
|
4 |
3.8 |
4 |
4.1 |
3.7 |
4.4 |
3.8 |
4.2 |
4 |
4.1 |
3.8 |
4.5 |
(Pass) |
|
7.2 |
6.3 |
6.2 |
|
7 |
6.8 |
6.1 |
6.7 |
6 |
6.3 |
6.6 |
7.4 |
6.4 |
6.7 |
6.5 |
7.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Ryan |
3710 |
235 |
220 |
285 |
|
265 |
240 |
260 |
330 |
230 |
210 |
190 |
260 |
250 |
295 |
180 |
260 |
TD |
21 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
|
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
INT |
11 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Turner |
1265 |
80 |
110 |
55 |
|
70 |
105 |
65 |
70 |
45 |
90 |
75 |
120 |
100 |
105 |
50 |
125 |
Ru TD |
13 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
Re Yards |
45 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
Re TD |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
7 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Norwood |
375 |
25 |
10 |
25 |
|
40 |
20 |
35 |
10 |
30 |
55 |
15 |
25 |
0 |
45 |
10 |
30 |
Ru TD |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Re Yards |
335 |
20 |
15 |
40 |
|
25 |
10 |
25 |
60 |
25 |
0 |
10 |
20 |
25 |
20 |
25 |
15 |
Re TD |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
44 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
|
3 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R White |
1280 |
95 |
65 |
110 |
|
100 |
85 |
70 |
120 |
55 |
85 |
100 |
50 |
100 |
90 |
35 |
120 |
Re TD |
7 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Rec |
83 |
6 |
5 |
8 |
|
7 |
6 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
5 |
7 |
4 |
5 |
8 |
3 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Jenkins |
730 |
50 |
60 |
40 |
|
65 |
45 |
50 |
40 |
45 |
45 |
30 |
60 |
40 |
75 |
45 |
40 |
Re TD |
5 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
64 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
|
5 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
4 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B Finneran |
380 |
10 |
30 |
20 |
|
20 |
30 |
40 |
35 |
45 |
25 |
0 |
30 |
25 |
40 |
15 |
15 |
Re TD |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
30 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
2 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T Gonzalez |
940 |
60 |
45 |
75 |
|
55 |
70 |
65 |
70 |
60 |
55 |
50 |
100 |
45 |
60 |
60 |
70 |
Re TD |
7 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
Rec |
77 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
|
4 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
7 |
3 |
5 |
8 |
5 |
|
Gone for Michael
Turner's life are the weaker defenses of the NFC North and AFC
West (Minnesota and Chicago finished in the top 10 vs. the run and
only San Diego joined them in the top half of the league in 2008).
Instead, he has the unfortunate task of putting on an encore performance
against the NFC and AFC East this season. By comparison, five of
the eight teams on the Falcons' new schedule were top-10 rush defenses
in 2008 and only Buffalo did not finish in the top half of the league
stopping the run. Granted, this year's rankings vs. the run won't
be a carbon copy of last year's, but it's hard to argue that Turner
didn't take advantage of a weaker schedule as he gained 909 of 1,699
rushing yards and scored of his nine of his 17 TDs last season in
the eight games vs. the NFC North and AFC West. (Add in the Falcons'
game against one of the league's worst rush defenses in St. Louis
in Week 17 last season and those totals spike to 1,117 and 10. Put
into further context, Atlanta played each of the six teams that
gave up 20+ rushing TDs last season. By comparison, this season,
the Falcons play seven games against the ten stingiest teams in
that category from a season ago.) Unlike a comparable back in Adrian
Peterson - in terms of their fantasy contributions coming from just
their rushing totals - Turner does not have a similarly talented
offensive line or the Vikings' defense that allows Minnesota to
run "All Day". As such, I am no fan of "The Burner" or his ability
to live up to his average draft position of 1.3. In fact, with his
five red matchups, I'm having a hard time endorsing Turner as a
first-round fantasy pick this season, especially in PPR leagues!
It is only due to his incredible talent and the fact the Falcons
traded for an all-around TE like Tony
Gonzalez that I am projecting the numbers for Turner that I
have.
Matt Ryan may have improved by leaps and bounds over his Rookie
of the Year campaign, unfortunately, so has his schedule. The
same slate that helped Turner to a huge breakout season is the
same one that allowed Ryan to dissect his NFC North and AFC West
opponents for 10 TDs and just four INTs in 2008. Certainly, it
hasn't been lost on me that Atlanta acquired Gonzalez, a player
that should go a long way in helping Ryan to maintain that 5:2
TD/INT ratio, but forgive if I'm not exactly ready to sell the
farm to secure the second-year QB's services in 2009. While the
passing game's schedule is a bit easier to take than the running
game's, all four NFC East teams finished in the top eight of the
league vs. the pass last season and it could be argued that maybe
only the Eagles have taken a step back. By comparison, Oakland
finished 10th - in large part to teams running the ball so effectively
against them - while the rest of the AFC West finished 26th or
worst.) Furthermore, I'm not crazy about Ryan having field days
against the Patriots, Dolphins or Jets, the last of which he faces
in Week 15. Ryan has a bright future in this league, so I feel
like I have taken that into account by giving him the benefit
of the doubt with his final numbers, but that doesn't mean I'm
eyeing him as much more than a low-end fantasy QB1 in 2009. Although
Harry Douglas didn't exactly set the world on fire with a 22-314-1
line in his rookie season, his absence is going to give Atlanta
one less advantage in the matchup game each week as Brian Finneran
isn't anywhere close to the same WR that Douglas is, especially
in the slot. Taking into account Douglas' season-ending injury,
it turns out I gave Michael Jenkins a pretty healthy boost over
the numbers I had for him previously. Fortunately, Roddy White's
holdout was brief, meaning his final numbers shouldn't suffer
much, if at all. It's a good thing, too, because a less talented
combo than Ryan-to-White would need every snap possible to successfully
navigate an early-season schedule that includes seven difficult
matchups over the first 10 games. And the stretch run doesn't
get much easier for White as he will likely run up against Asante
Samuel in Week 13 and Darrelle Revis in Week 15. Long story short,
as tempting as it is to latch on to Falcons' offensive players
this season, I'm not seeing the offensive line talent, a play-caller
savvy enough to adjust to the more difficult defenses he will
face this season or the schedule necessary to warrant all the
buzz. While I believe Atlanta has the talent in place now to overcome
some of its difficult matchups this season, I don't foresee the
Falcons building the necessary offensive chemistry to overcome
this kind of schedule until next season.
Carolina Panthers |
|
Totals |
PHI |
ATL |
DAL |
bye |
WAS |
TB |
BUF |
ARI |
NO |
ATL |
MIA |
NYJ |
TB |
NE |
MIN |
NYG |
(Run) |
|
4 |
4.6 |
4 |
|
3.7 |
4.2 |
4.5 |
4.4 |
4.1 |
4.6 |
4.3 |
3.8 |
4.2 |
3.9 |
3.8 |
3.8 |
(Pass) |
|
6.4 |
7.1 |
6.1 |
|
6 |
7.4 |
7.4 |
6.7 |
6.7 |
7.1 |
7.2 |
6.5 |
7.4 |
6.2 |
6.6 |
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Delhomme |
3080 |
170 |
225 |
225 |
|
175 |
230 |
245 |
195 |
200 |
185 |
220 |
175 |
220 |
270 |
185 |
160 |
TD |
20 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
INT |
13 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Williams |
1120 |
80 |
100 |
65 |
|
40 |
115 |
65 |
120 |
45 |
55 |
105 |
50 |
85 |
65 |
55 |
75 |
Ru TD |
11 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
Re Yards |
150 |
10 |
0 |
5 |
|
5 |
5 |
25 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
30 |
5 |
20 |
Re TD |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
23 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
1 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Stewart |
840 |
45 |
65 |
80 |
|
60 |
45 |
40 |
25 |
70 |
100 |
40 |
55 |
65 |
45 |
45 |
60 |
Ru TD |
9 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Re Yards |
120 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
|
10 |
5 |
0 |
15 |
5 |
5 |
10 |
0 |
25 |
15 |
15 |
5 |
Re TD |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
19 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S Smith |
1360 |
55 |
125 |
80 |
|
90 |
125 |
110 |
70 |
85 |
85 |
120 |
40 |
115 |
110 |
80 |
70 |
Re TD |
8 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Rec |
93 |
4 |
9 |
6 |
|
6 |
7 |
8 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
9 |
3 |
7 |
8 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Muhammad |
765 |
55 |
60 |
75 |
|
30 |
50 |
65 |
75 |
35 |
50 |
30 |
65 |
35 |
75 |
40 |
25 |
Re TD |
4 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
60 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
6 |
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Jarrett |
585 |
35 |
40 |
55 |
|
40 |
30 |
40 |
35 |
50 |
25 |
45 |
55 |
45 |
30 |
35 |
25 |
Re TD |
4 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
49 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
4 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J King |
100 |
10 |
0 |
5 |
|
0 |
15 |
5 |
0 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
15 |
Re TD |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
16 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
|
If the fantasy football world thought that my analysis of the Falcons'
schedule (and what it means for Turner's 2009 prospects) was harsh,
wait until they get a taste of my thoughts on last year's true breakout
performer, DeAngelo
Williams. Unlike Turner, Williams has a ready-made excuse for
2009, that is, if Jonathan
Stewart can ever get fully healthy again. A healthy Stewart
will likely lead to a full season of Williams' first-half production
from a season ago (more on that below) whereas an unhealthy Stewart
could free up Williams to have another huge season. But before Williams'
owners start sticking pins into their Stewart voodoo dolls (or vice
versa), consider this for a second: through the Panthers' Week 9
bye last season, Williams had a modest five total TDs and two 100-yard
games. Then, over the final eight games - five of which were against
the worst eight rush defenses (Lions - worst, Raiders - 31st, Broncos
- 27th, Packers - 26th, Falcons - 25th), he tripled both totals,
capped off by a career-defining four-score outburst in Week 16 vs.
the Giants. While that was an impressive performance by any stretch
of the imagination, the Giants' defense wasn’t nearly the animal
it had been for that game and during the entire month of December.
(The season’s final month was so hard on the Giants that they allowed
all three of their 100-yards rushing performances and nine of the
defense's 15 total TDs vs. opposing RBs - very few fantasy owners
could have foreseen Plaxico Burress shooting himself in the leg
and the affect it was going to have on both sides of the ball.)
The point is that much like the Falcons’ Turner, Williams and Stewart
won't have a lot of opportunity to beat up on the same weaklings
this season as they did in 2008. Case in point - the run up to and
during the fantasy playoffs for the Panthers this season, in my
opinion, is more difficult for them than any other team in the league.
First, in Week 12, Carolina travels to New York to take on the Jets
before getting an average matchup at best at home vs. the Bucs.
Then, the Panthers head to New England in Week 14 before hosting
Minnesota in Week 15 and taking another trip to New York to meet
the Giants in Week 16. Because their offensive line is such a good
run-blocking unit, I'm not swearing off the Panthers' potential
for RB production completely during the fantasy postseason, but
understand there is plenty of risk for any owner investing a high
pick in Williams or Stewart this season: 1) Each of Carolina's offensive
linemen missed at least one game last season, but unlike 2008, there
is very little proven or experienced depth behind them; 2) the fact
that Williams and Stewart have someone as talented as each other
to compete with for touches makes counting on either all season
very dicey and; 3) the aforementioned schedule looks nice with one
red matchup through Week 11, but ends rather unceremoniously.
Since Steve
Smith's true breakout season (2003) that established him as
one of the league's best wideouts, he has amassed 6,312 receiving
yards. To put that into some perspective, that total is nearly
33% of Carolina's total receiving yardage over that time. If we
throw out the 2004 season in which Smith was injured for the season
in the first game and posted just 60 of the team's 3,643 total
receiving yards, Smith is responsible for over 40% of the team's
yards gained through the air! Needless to say, the Panthers' passing
game begins and ends with the mighty mite. Fortunately for him
and his fantasy owners, Smith has proved not only to be one of
the league's toughest receivers over that time, but also one of
the few players in the league who is essentially what I like to
call "matchup-proof". Considering what he has to go up against
in the fantasy playoffs this season, he figures to give that moniker
a good run for its money. Cold-weather contests in New England
in Week 14 and in New York against the Giants in Week 16 don't
project to be high-yardage games for anybody. However, if we have
learned one things over the years (and the numbers above prove
it), Jake
Delhomme isn't against force-feeding the ball to Smith. So
while I'm not crazy about how his fantasy season winds down, I'm
really only concerned with Smith's ability to produce solid fantasy
totals in Week 1 vs. Philly's Asante
Samuel and in Week 12 vs. the Jets Darrelle
Revis. Outside of Smith, the schedule looks absolutely brutal
for the secondary players in the passing game. While Dwayne
Jarrett is getting hyped as a player ready to push Muhsin
Muhammad for a starting spot, both players will probably negate
the other for touches while trying to overcome seven red matchups
on the schedule on a team that wants to run the ball all day long.
To be quite honest, I'd be quite surprised -barring injury - if
either Muhammad or Jarrett lived up to the numbers I have projected
for them here, but as always, I try to imagine the best-case scenario
first and work back from there. Lastly, with my feelings pretty
clear on the difficulty of Carolina's schedule, I can't really
endorse Delhomme as anything more than a bye-week fill-in. He'll
have his moments in the first half of the season, but he'll really
have to raise his game to excel in December.
New Orleans Saints |
|
Totals |
DET |
PHI |
BUF |
NYJ |
bye |
NYG |
MIA |
ATL |
CAR |
STL |
TB |
NE |
WAS |
ATL |
DAL |
TB |
(Run) |
|
4.7 |
4 |
4.5 |
3.8 |
|
3.8 |
4.3 |
4.6 |
4.4 |
4.6 |
4.2 |
3.9 |
3.7 |
4.6 |
4 |
4.2 |
(Pass) |
|
7.9 |
6.4 |
7.4 |
6.5 |
|
6.6 |
7.2 |
7.1 |
6.3 |
7.6 |
7.4 |
6.2 |
6 |
7.1 |
6.1 |
7.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Brees |
4370 |
305 |
205 |
320 |
260 |
|
285 |
305 |
285 |
280 |
265 |
315 |
325 |
255 |
350 |
280 |
335 |
TD |
31 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
3 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
INT |
13 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R Bush |
560 |
50 |
30 |
55 |
25 |
|
35 |
50 |
70 |
50 |
0 |
40 |
20 |
0 |
55 |
35 |
45 |
Ru TD |
4 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Re Yards |
540 |
75 |
25 |
45 |
50 |
|
30 |
45 |
65 |
15 |
0 |
25 |
40 |
0 |
35 |
30 |
60 |
Re TD |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
66 |
8 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
4 |
7 |
6 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
4 |
5 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P Thomas |
1055 |
80 |
50 |
90 |
55 |
|
60 |
70 |
50 |
70 |
115 |
65 |
50 |
75 |
80 |
60 |
85 |
Ru TD |
10 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Re Yards |
260 |
10 |
10 |
25 |
35 |
|
25 |
20 |
0 |
20 |
30 |
15 |
15 |
25 |
5 |
15 |
10 |
Re TD |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Rec |
32 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
2 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Colston |
1210 |
90 |
55 |
105 |
40 |
|
75 |
90 |
100 |
60 |
110 |
100 |
75 |
60 |
125 |
40 |
85 |
Re TD |
11 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
Rec |
87 |
6 |
3 |
8 |
4 |
|
5 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
7 |
8 |
6 |
6 |
9 |
3 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L Moore |
900 |
55 |
65 |
50 |
40 |
|
45 |
60 |
40 |
100 |
55 |
65 |
85 |
45 |
60 |
75 |
60 |
Re TD |
6 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Rec |
74 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
|
5 |
6 |
4 |
7 |
5 |
4 |
7 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Henderson |
410 |
30 |
0 |
30 |
30 |
|
55 |
25 |
0 |
40 |
25 |
25 |
0 |
60 |
35 |
25 |
30 |
Re TD |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
20 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
3 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R Meachem |
460 |
15 |
20 |
40 |
20 |
|
30 |
50 |
40 |
15 |
0 |
40 |
50 |
25 |
20 |
60 |
35 |
Re TD |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Rec |
32 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
2 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Shockey |
590 |
30 |
30 |
25 |
45 |
|
25 |
15 |
40 |
30 |
45 |
45 |
60 |
40 |
70 |
35 |
55 |
Re TD |
4 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Rec |
50 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
|
2 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
|
Remember the saying, "one of these is not like the others"?
It sure fits nicely for the Saints, who are a high-volume passing
team in a running division. Certainly, when Drew Brees is the triggerman,
it makes sense to drop back and throw all day long. HC Sean Payton's
offense is set up for the QB to have fantasy success with a 60-40
pass-run ratio over his first three years as New Orleans' head coach.
But as is the case with any player, weaknesses can be found if a
person digs deep enough. Brees’ 11:12 TD:INT road split in
2008 overshadowed an incredible 23:5 home split and ran completely
contrary to his usual success away from the Superdome (33:10 TD:INT
split in first two years as a Saint). Most of the reasons for this
downturn were out of his control (Marques Colston's injury and an
inconsistent defense that often forced the team into shootouts are
two good examples). With those two problems and several others seemingly
resolved, it would come as little surprise if Brees wasn't a more
consistent QB this season. However, with the running game and defense
both upgraded, I'm not sure another run at Dan Marino's single-season
passing yardage mark is in the cards this season. (No worries though,
Brees' worst passing-yardage season since joining New Orleans is
4,418 yards in 2006.) Fortunately, Brees has Colston back and Lance
Moore returning from his career-best season and a schedule that
is challenging in the middle, but pretty advantageous on the edges,
especially during the fantasy playoffs. The ex-San Diego QB, who
threw for 24 TDs vs. eight picks in nine indoor games a season ago,
and his entourage finish the fantasy season with three straight
dome games, starting off vs. a tame Falcons' pass defense before
wrapping up with a pair of home games vs. Dallas and Tampa Bay.
Because both opponents will be running teams this season, New Orleans
will likely be focused on jumping out to an early lead via the passing
game. And for fantasy owners, that is not all the good news. As
Brees and Payton showed us on several occasions last season, New
Orleans isn't afraid to keep the pedal down once it gets a lead.
And if we are to believe Brees and Colston, former first-rounder
Robert Meachem is ready to join the parade. With Moore recovering
from shoulder surgery and the third-year WR drawing "most impressive
player in camp" praise, this may be the year to invest a late-round
pick in Meachem in hopes he can assume Devery Henderson's deep-ball
role and possibly more.
As I have mentioned in this space before, despite a 60-40 pass-run
ratio since Payton took over the Saints in 2006, New Orleans'
RBs have finished third, tenth and fourth in team fantasy points
scored (according to traditional, non-PPR scoring) - an amazing
stat considering that 2006 was the only season in which their
backs have surpassed 400 carries. The point is that despite such
a pass-heavy approach, New Orleans can still give fantasy owners
two fantasy-worthy RBs because a fair amount of Brees' attempts
are swing or screen passes. (I'll be the first to admit that as
difficult as it is to project the season like I attempt to do,
trying to forecast how often Brees will opt to dump it off to
Reggie Bush or Pierre Thomas is nearly impossible.) Although this
team will be a passing team for as long as Brees and Payton are
working in tandem, it is not lost on the head coach to use his
RBs when the Saints get into scoring position. Since 2006, New
Orleans RBs have accounted for 41 of the 66 TDs (rushing or receiving)
from inside the five-yard line, which may not sound like much
to a "normal" team, but to one which is so heavily predisposed
toward airing it out, it is notable considering the Saints have
a player such as Marques Colston who is a mismatch for just about
any CB in the league in the red zone. Turning to the 2009 schedule,
it's amazing that even though the Saints play many of the same
opponents as the rest of the NFC South does, there is reason to
be more optimistic about Thomas and Bush. First off, the Saints
start off the season with two positive matchups and one neutral
one - a stretch that should allow the offense to build some trust
in the ground attack. A bye is sandwiched by a pair of home games
vs. both New York teams, but then New Orleans should enjoy a fairly
productive five-week run. While New England and Washington will
probably keep the New Orleans running game in check, both games
come right before the start of the fantasy playoffs in Week 12-13.
A Week 14 tilt at Atlanta could easily be a shootout before they
close out the fantasy season at home with two straight neutral
matchups. While I gave Dallas the benefit of the doubt on stopping
the run against the Saints, I'm not sure either the Cowboys or
Bucs will be all that effective stopping any part of the New Orleans
offense in the Superdome. Admittedly, the Saints don't have the
easiest schedule to run against, but it does offer plenty of opportunity
for the team to rely on the ground game more often than they have
in the past.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers |
|
Totals |
DAL |
BUF |
NYG |
WAS |
PHI |
CAR |
NE |
bye |
GB |
MIA |
NO |
ATL |
CAR |
NYJ |
SEA |
NO |
(Run) |
|
4 |
4.5 |
3.8 |
3.7 |
4 |
4.4 |
3.9 |
|
4 |
4.3 |
4.1 |
4.6 |
4.4 |
3.8 |
4.2 |
4.1 |
(Pass) |
|
6.1 |
7.4 |
6.6 |
6 |
6.4 |
6.3 |
6.2 |
|
6.8 |
7.2 |
6.7 |
7.1 |
6.3 |
6.5 |
7 |
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B Leftwich |
3140 |
210 |
240 |
210 |
185 |
200 |
195 |
225 |
|
215 |
175 |
265 |
220 |
180 |
185 |
205 |
230 |
TD |
14 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
INT |
15 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Ward |
975 |
50 |
80 |
55 |
80 |
40 |
70 |
75 |
|
55 |
85 |
60 |
100 |
50 |
70 |
40 |
65 |
Ru TD |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Re Yards |
300 |
15 |
20 |
40 |
10 |
40 |
20 |
10 |
|
5 |
0 |
30 |
20 |
15 |
45 |
15 |
15 |
Re TD |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
45 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
|
2 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E Graham |
695 |
45 |
35 |
30 |
25 |
75 |
50 |
30 |
|
60 |
45 |
70 |
40 |
75 |
20 |
40 |
55 |
Ru TD |
9 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Re Yards |
105 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
|
15 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
10 |
Re TD |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
16 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Bryant |
865 |
50 |
80 |
40 |
70 |
35 |
60 |
85 |
|
30 |
75 |
85 |
55 |
45 |
25 |
60 |
70 |
Re TD |
4 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
63 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
2 |
5 |
8 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Clayton |
420 |
25 |
45 |
30 |
40 |
30 |
20 |
0 |
|
40 |
15 |
30 |
35 |
15 |
50 |
15 |
30 |
Re TD |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
39 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
|
4 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
B Clark/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S Stroughter |
555 |
40 |
30 |
55 |
15 |
25 |
45 |
60 |
|
45 |
25 |
35 |
15 |
55 |
30 |
35 |
45 |
Re TD |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Rec |
46 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
|
5 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
6 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K Winslow |
895 |
75 |
65 |
40 |
35 |
60 |
50 |
55 |
|
80 |
60 |
75 |
90 |
50 |
30 |
70 |
60 |
Re TD |
6 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Rec |
80 |
7 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
|
6 |
7 |
5 |
8 |
4 |
4 |
7 |
5 |
|
Because the Bucs will be a running team this season - more than
they have been since the turn of the century - it makes sense to
start there first. A quick glance at the schedule reveals that I
am not a big fan of their ability to produce consistently this season.
The odd thing is that unlike most teams, I don't feel Tampa Bay's
lack of RB production this season will be due to a lack of "running
game talent". What I mean by that is that generally I can attribute
a RB's lack of numbers to an offensive line, a bad scheme or a poor
defense more often than not - none of which I feel apply here. Let's
start with the roles Earnest Graham and Derrick Ward will play in
the offense this season. If I had to guess at this moment, I imagine
that Ward will win a 60-40 or 65-35 split of the touches coming
out of the Bucs backfield, but Graham will emerge as the goal-line
"vulture". If this is the way it actually plays out, Ward
becomes no better than a decent fantasy RB3 in non-PPR leagues (or
low-end RB2 in PPR) while Graham is probably a serviceable RB3 in
non-PPR and RB4 in PPR. The problem is that both players have the
size to stand up to the goal-line punishment and good enough hands
to be threats in the passing game. However, with the struggles the
passing game is likely to encounter, Graham and Ward will consistently
face eight in the box. Let's also not forget that the offensive
line is transitioning to a zone-based blocking scheme after years
of man-blocking and the schedule certainly does not allow much room
for error early on. In their first five games, the Bucs face all
four NFC East teams with only a road game at Buffalo serving as
an opportunity for Ward and Graham to get it going. After that difficult
stretch is over, Tampa Bay hosts both Carolina and New England before
heading into its Week 8 bye. What this means is Ward and Graham
may have only two real shots at fantasy success through half of
the fantasy season. Coming out of the off-week, the red matchups
pretty much stop but games against the Packers, Dolphins and Saints
don't inspire much confidence in a ground-it-out approach for several
different reasons. Assuming Ward and Graham owners get to the point
where they are still holding on to their backs, a difficult three-game
stretch during the fantasy playoffs awaits them. The Jets figure
to stop the run again this season and, after that, the Bucs cap
off the fantasy season by playing road games in Seattle and New
Orleans, both of which I expect to be much more respectable vs.
the run this season. What it all boils down to is that while I have
Tampa Bay down for four red matchups, the final tally might show
it was more like eight or nine. In essence, not all "neutral"
matchups are created equal.
As bad as things look for the running game, it's not exactly
a walk in the park for the passing game either. It's hard to like
Antonio Bryant going off against the likes of Terence Newman,
DeAngelo Hall or Asante Samuel this season, just to name a few.
In fact, Bryant may be hard-pressed to put together more than
one fantasy WR3-type performance over the first half of the season,
a notion that is completely unacceptable for a number of owners
who expect a repeat of last season. While new OC Jeff Jagodzinski's
new offense will be feature more downfield passing than did Jon
Gruden's, "Jags" loves to use his TEs and feature the
running game, yet another strike against Bryant. After his nightmarish
first-half slate, Bryant could make for a decent buy-low candidate
for the second half. However, I just can't foresee him having
all that much success in 2009. With Bryant likely to suffer from
the blues this season, the weight of the passing game will likely
fall onto Kellen Winslow, who was given all the same red marks
that Bryant was. Unlike Bryant, Winslow won't be matched up against
an opponent's #1 CB, meaning if he can stay healthy, he could
put up the same kind of numbers he posted during his finest years
in Cleveland in an offense that will feature a young QB (who typically
lean on their TEs early on in their careers) and a play-caller
that has seemingly always been able to make at least one of his
TEs a huge part of his offense. Considering his mid-seventh round
ADP, Winslow could end up being a pretty good bargain for those
patient owners who want to fill out their WR or RB ranks first
but still want top-notch production from a mid-to-late round TE.
While I do make mentions of Michael Clayton, Brian Clark and rookie
Sammie Stroughter, this new offense - along with a relatively
green QB - pretty much ensure that only Bryant and Winslow are
worth putting on a fantasy roster. And given that Bryant will
rarely get a week away from some of the best DB's in the league,
Winslow will need to turn in a Pro Bowl-level performance in 2009
if this offense wants to go anywhere this season.
Arizona Cardinals |
|
Totals |
SF |
JAX |
IND |
bye |
HOU |
SEA |
NYG |
CAR |
CHI |
SEA |
STL |
TEN |
MIN |
SF |
DET |
STL |
(Run) |
|
4 |
4 |
4.1 |
|
4.3 |
4.2 |
3.8 |
4.4 |
3.8 |
4.2 |
4.6 |
4.1 |
3.8 |
4 |
4.7 |
4.6 |
(Pass) |
|
7 |
7.2 |
6.1 |
|
7.2 |
7 |
6.6 |
6.3 |
6.8 |
7 |
7.6 |
6.5 |
6.6 |
7 |
7.9 |
7.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K Warner |
3380 |
230 |
295 |
245 |
|
245 |
320 |
210 |
|
|
260 |
245 |
180 |
345 |
275 |
235 |
295 |
TD |
25 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
|
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
2 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
INT |
11 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
3 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Leinart |
550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265 |
285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TD |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INT |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C Wells |
860 |
40 |
50 |
60 |
|
45 |
65 |
55 |
100 |
40 |
70 |
50 |
35 |
25 |
65 |
110 |
50 |
Ru TD |
5 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Re Yards |
110 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|
0 |
5 |
15 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
15 |
Re TD |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
18 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T Hightower |
580 |
55 |
35 |
25 |
|
35 |
15 |
30 |
45 |
60 |
25 |
75 |
20 |
30 |
50 |
40 |
40 |
Ru TD |
8 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
Re Yards |
195 |
15 |
15 |
5 |
|
10 |
20 |
0 |
25 |
10 |
15 |
0 |
20 |
35 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
Re TD |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
28 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
1 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Boldin |
1090 |
90 |
80 |
60 |
|
120 |
85 |
0 |
0 |
65 |
110 |
85 |
40 |
70 |
115 |
100 |
70 |
Re TD |
10 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Rec |
90 |
8 |
6 |
6 |
|
10 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
8 |
7 |
3 |
8 |
9 |
7 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L Fitzgerald |
1295 |
50 |
105 |
80 |
|
80 |
120 |
50 |
125 |
90 |
90 |
70 |
40 |
130 |
65 |
80 |
120 |
Re TD |
11 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
Rec |
95 |
3 |
8 |
6 |
|
5 |
8 |
4 |
10 |
6 |
7 |
6 |
3 |
10 |
5 |
6 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S Breaston |
825 |
55 |
45 |
60 |
|
35 |
65 |
85 |
70 |
65 |
30 |
40 |
45 |
60 |
80 |
25 |
65 |
Re TD |
4 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Rec |
68 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
|
2 |
5 |
8 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
6 |
2 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Urban |
415 |
10 |
40 |
30 |
|
0 |
25 |
60 |
45 |
45 |
15 |
40 |
30 |
40 |
0 |
10 |
25 |
Re TD |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
34 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
|
0 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
Even though I realize the NFL doesn't consider fantasy implications
when putting together the schedule, a part of me believes they have
a sense of humor. Cleveland gets the benefit of playing Kansas City
and Oakland in Weeks 15-16 but don't appear to have the running
game necessary to take full advantage of it. As passing game schedules
go, the Cardinals have a pretty nice go of it, especially in Weeks
14-16; the only problem being how well Kurt Warner's surgerically-repaired
hip will hold up. The 38-year-old QB told ESPN prior to Arizona's
preseason opener that his hip was bothering him just standing still,
but tends to feel better as he becomes more active. Still, Warner
turned in his first 16-game season since 2001 last season and is
a poor bet to give his owners 16 more, which obviously has a trickle-down
affect on the rest of the offense. Thus, this message becomes more
of an advertisement to invest a late-round pick in Matt Leinart
because it doesn't sound like anyone in their right mind should
lean on Warner too heavily. In such a scenario, I'm not sure I would
expect all that much of a dropoff based on what I've seen and read
coming out of Cardinals' camp about Leinart but I would probably
knock Larry Fitzgerald a few spots on my WR rankings. Arizona's
transition from former OC Todd Haley to HC Ken Whisenhunt probably
affects Steve Breaston the most (as the Cardinals would be hard-pressed
to take receptions away from Fitzgerald or Anquan Boldin), but while
the Michigan alum probably won't repeat his 1,000-yard season, he
remains one of the more attractive non-starting WRs available in
fantasy. As I've already touched on, the schedule and how it lays
out is favorable to Warner and Leinart, so it becomes a matter of
just how much more Whisenhunt will count on the ground game than
his predecessor did. Only three clear-cut negative matchups jump
out to me, but only the Giants strike me as a defense that could
really have their way with the Cardinals' passing game. Otherwise,
the first six and last four games of the fantasy season seem awfully
appealing for any owner counting on Warner, Fitzgerald or Boldin.
If we are to use history as a barometer of what Whisenhunt wants
to do on offense, it's a good bet that he'll try his best to even
out last season's 64-36 pass-to-run ratio, even if he earns a
few gray hairs in the process. But first, he'll have to figure
out how he wants to handle the tag team of Tim Hightower and Chris
"Beanie" Wells. Since the rookie sprained his ankle
on the first day of camp, he has been unable to practice, leaving
Hightower with all the important reps. What it all means for Wells
is that Whisenhunt can't take advantage of the things that his
first-round pick does well if he doesn't know what they are, making
a return to the practice field this week very important for his
hopes of securing a split of the workload in 2009. Believe it
or not, even without a noticeable upgrade up front, the RB battle
is important for fantasy purposes because of who the Cardinals
face during the fantasy playoffs. While I like the Niners' ability
to stop the run this season, they will not be an elite unit in
that regard. In Weeks 15-16, Arizona faces Detroit and St. Louis,
which both have no way to go but up in terms of stopping the run.
The Lions (32nd) and Rams (T-28th) featured two of the five worst
rush defenses from a season ago, so while Jim Schwartz and Steve
Spagnuolo will both do everything in their power to make their
teams respectable in those departments, there is no reason to
expect drastic improvement from either squad. Of course by then,
the RB situation will have been sorted out, but that is much too
late for fantasy owners. In my humble opinion, Wells (assuming
he doesn't suffer another setback) will grab a slight majority
of the carries sometime after the Week 4 bye but will be replaced
by a trimmer Hightower in short-yardage situations, much like
how he worked with Edgerrin James in 2008. However, I am no longer
willing to bet that Wells is this rookie class' lone 300-carry
rusher as I was in June.
St. Louis Rams |
|
Totals |
SEA |
WAS |
GB |
SF |
MIN |
JAX |
IND |
DET |
bye |
NO |
ARI |
SEA |
CHI |
TEN |
HOU |
ARI |
(Run) |
|
4.2 |
3.7 |
4 |
4 |
3.8 |
4 |
4.1 |
4.7 |
|
4.1 |
4.4 |
4.2 |
3.8 |
4.1 |
4.3 |
4.4 |
(Pass) |
|
7 |
6 |
6.8 |
7 |
6.6 |
7.2 |
6.1 |
7.9 |
|
6.7 |
6.7 |
7 |
6.8 |
6.5 |
7.2 |
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Bulger |
3165 |
220 |
245 |
220 |
175 |
225 |
195 |
165 |
255 |
|
195 |
230 |
170 |
235 |
160 |
295 |
180 |
TD |
15 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
|
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
INT |
15 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S Jackson |
1220 |
85 |
50 |
75 |
105 |
40 |
85 |
70 |
125 |
|
70 |
105 |
100 |
60 |
75 |
100 |
75 |
Ru TD |
9 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Re Yards |
500 |
45 |
30 |
50 |
15 |
75 |
15 |
10 |
35 |
|
45 |
30 |
5 |
40 |
20 |
50 |
35 |
Re TD |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
63 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
7 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
|
5 |
4 |
2 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Avery |
875 |
40 |
85 |
20 |
60 |
45 |
90 |
30 |
65 |
|
55 |
70 |
30 |
100 |
40 |
110 |
35 |
Re TD |
5 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
57 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
|
3 |
6 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
7 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L Robinson |
360 |
45 |
30 |
55 |
15 |
0 |
20 |
20 |
40 |
|
0 |
25 |
70 |
40 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Re TD |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
23 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
|
0 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K Burton |
525 |
15 |
40 |
35 |
45 |
25 |
10 |
45 |
50 |
|
25 |
35 |
45 |
0 |
55 |
40 |
60 |
Re TD |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Rec |
41 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
|
2 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R Curry |
400 |
35 |
25 |
10 |
0 |
45 |
35 |
25 |
50 |
|
20 |
25 |
10 |
25 |
25 |
50 |
20 |
Re TD |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Rec |
35 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
|
2 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R McMichael |
505 |
40 |
35 |
50 |
40 |
35 |
25 |
35 |
15 |
|
50 |
45 |
10 |
30 |
20 |
45 |
30 |
Re TD |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
46 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
|
5 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
|
The new coaching staff wasted little time in identifying Steven
Jackson as the centerpiece of the offense. And why not? Jackson
embodies every element that a coach wants in a franchise back (although
his durability has been lacking in recent seasons). The team quickly
added promising C Jason Brown from the Ravens and spent the No.
2 overall pick in the draft on Baylor T Jason Smith, helping to
solidify an offensive line that has been short of quality and quantity
for far too long. Given the current state of this franchise, it
could be argued that running back and offensive line are now the
two strongest parts of this offense. Fortunately, the schedule appears
to cater to this development, so as long as Jackson can take it,
St. Louis will allow him to carry this offense this season. Given
the new West Coast offense that OC Pat Shurmur is bringing over
from Philadelphia, it would come as little surprise if Jackson ends
up as the team's leading receiver in addition to its rushing leader.
And the reports surrounding his offseason work ethic - a sore subject
for him at times - couldn't be much more favorable. So while it
may be foolish to count on him coming anywhere close to his 436-touch
campaign of 2006, it is not unreasonable to think Jackson won't
approach 400 touches, with the 90 catches he hauled in during that
2006 season a realistic possibility. Although only three green matchups
appear on Jackson's schedule, one of them is in Week 16 vs. Arizona.
On the other hand, he is faced with only three red matchups, two
of which come in the season's first five weeks and the other in
Week 13. Certainly, Tennessee in Week 14 isn't a wonderful game
for Jackson to pile up the numbers, but I feel he will be motivated
to outperform Chris Johnson plus the Titans' approach is grind-it-out,
meaning the Rams should be able to hang in longer and stick with
the running game. Either way, that's one of the beautiful things
about owning the all-purpose backs like Maurice
Jones-Drew, Brian Westbrook or Jackson - no matter the margin
on the scoreboard, they can and, most likely, will produce because
they are their team's best runner and receiver. Those kinds of backs
in fantasy are worth their weight in gold.
Every year, there are a handful of teams that are forced to ask
themselves: How did the receiving situation get this bad this
quickly? To be brutally honest, Donnie Avery would still be a
WR2 understudy on most teams while the collection of Keenan Burton,
Laurent Robinson and Ronald Curry would be little more than WR4
or WR5 options if they played somewhere else. Don't get me wrong,
there is some upside to these receivers, but both Burton and Robinson
are green while Curry has had trouble recapturing the form that
allowed him to be a 50-catch receiver three different times in
this league. Unfortunately, one of those players (two if we are
to believe Avery may miss the season opener) will need to start
each week. And while the line seems to be doing well blocking
for the run so far in camp, there is apparently much reason for
concern when Marc Bulger goes back to throw. The Rams QB is still
capable of being an above-average triggerman in this league, but
one has to wonder just how many more hits he can withstand. This
is one of the many reasons why Shurmur was hired to install the
West Coast offense, that is, to get the ball out of Bulger's hands
quickly and preserve him with an offense heavy on short passes
to Randy McMichael and Jackson. Looking at the schedule, the Rams
get very few red matchups. But as challenged as this receiving
group is right now, I'm not crazy about its chances to exploit
many of the neutral matchups either. In fact, I would expect every
single defense St. Louis faces in the second half of the season
to blitz even more than they would normally. Given the fact the
Rams lack a quality playmaker in the open field or down the field
(Avery does not qualify as either yet in my mind), St. Louis will
find itself struggling to score in several games this season.
As such, I believe Avery's 7.12 ADP is a bit high for my liking.
In fact, the only fantasy property from this passing game that
I expect to live up to his ADP this season is McMichael.
San Francisco 49ers |
|
Totals |
at ARI |
SEA |
at MIN |
STL |
ATL |
bye |
at HOU |
at IND |
TEN |
CHI |
at GB |
JAX |
at SEA |
ARI |
at PHI |
DET |
(Run) |
|
4.4 |
4.2 |
3.8 |
4.6 |
4.6 |
|
4.3 |
4.1 |
4.1 |
3.8 |
4 |
4 |
4.2 |
4.4 |
4 |
4.7 |
(Pass) |
|
6.7 |
7 |
6.6 |
7.6 |
7.1 |
|
7.2 |
6.1 |
6.5 |
6.8 |
6.8 |
7.2 |
7 |
6.7 |
6.4 |
7.9 |
A Smith/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S Hill |
3090 |
205 |
190 |
175 |
225 |
200 |
|
265 |
180 |
195 |
205 |
220 |
190 |
210 |
225 |
210 |
195 |
TD |
14 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
INT |
12 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Ru Yards |
90 |
5 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
|
15 |
10 |
5 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
Ru TD |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F Gore |
1365 |
100 |
90 |
130 |
110 |
115 |
|
65 |
80 |
70 |
45 |
80 |
100 |
65 |
80 |
115 |
120 |
Ru TD |
8 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Re Yards |
380 |
15 |
35 |
0 |
25 |
30 |
|
40 |
10 |
20 |
60 |
30 |
25 |
30 |
25 |
10 |
25 |
Re TD |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Rec |
53 |
2 |
5 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
|
5 |
3 |
3 |
7 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G Coffee |
335 |
15 |
15 |
40 |
20 |
10 |
|
30 |
10 |
15 |
35 |
25 |
15 |
10 |
25 |
30 |
40 |
Ru TD |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Re Yards |
30 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
Re TD |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
7 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Morgan |
730 |
40 |
55 |
55 |
75 |
40 |
|
50 |
35 |
45 |
30 |
70 |
45 |
55 |
45 |
30 |
60 |
Re TD |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Rec |
60 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
|
4 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I Bruce |
655 |
55 |
40 |
30 |
50 |
35 |
|
45 |
40 |
45 |
50 |
40 |
30 |
55 |
70 |
35 |
35 |
Re TD |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
52 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
|
3 |
4 |
2 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Crabtree |
440 |
15 |
25 |
10 |
25 |
35 |
|
20 |
30 |
35 |
45 |
20 |
45 |
20 |
30 |
50 |
35 |
Re TD |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Rec |
35 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Battle |
160 |
10 |
0 |
20 |
10 |
0 |
|
25 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
20 |
10 |
25 |
0 |
Re TD |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
16 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
V Davis |
695 |
70 |
35 |
55 |
40 |
55 |
|
85 |
50 |
30 |
20 |
45 |
45 |
25 |
45 |
55 |
40 |
Re TD |
4 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
62 |
6 |
2 |
6 |
3 |
4 |
|
7 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
|
Want a darkhorse pick for fantasy player of the year? How about
Frank Gore?
The man is an absolute joy to watch, does everything a coach wants
his feature back to do and does it all on a team that has been largely
unsuccessful in surrounding him with top-notch offensive talent.
Furthermore, his fantasy stock has suffered a bit as each of the
last two offensive coordinators did not make him as much of a focal
point of the offense as they probably should have. If the fifth-year
back does have a knock against him, it is probably that he has played
in all 16 games in a season just once, which coincidentally came
during his 372-touch, 2,180-total-yard campaign under then-OC Norv
Turner in 2006. Now I'll be the first to say I'm not the biggest
fan of new OC Jimmy Raye, but it is pretty clear Gore will be his
workhorse - it should also be noted the Niners are already familiar
with this system. (Gore has gone on record suggesting Raye's offense
is just like Turner's.) Moreover, Gore is reportedly in the best
shape of his pro career and happy to have FB Moran
Norris - who blocked for him in 2006 - back in the lineup. Combining
his newfound happiness and conditioning with the Niners' plan to
implement more zone-blocking schemes up front - something that should
only further complement Gore's incredible vision and instincts -
and before all said and done, Gore could easily outperform his early
second-round ADP. By now, I hope each of you realize I wouldn't
base my projections solely on a player's happiness in training camp,
so we go to the schedule, which only further my enthusiasm as it
relates to San Francisco’s centerpiece. Only the Bears in Week 10
strike me as a defense - when healthy - that may be able to keep
the 26-year-old back in check all game long. Tennessee and Green
Bay may also have limited success against him as well, but Gore
really could not have asked for a better schedule to play against.
Assuming Minnesota's Pat and Kevin Williams end up getting suspended
for the first four games as many still expect them to for their
association with StarCaps, the Niners' running game avoids a potential
early-season pitfall, meaning Gore should get off to a blistering
start with four green matchups. The post-bye slate isn't quite as
easy, but for a team that will be a stubborn running team, the ex-Hurricane
should routinely see at least 22 touches/game. Fast forward to the
three-week fantasy playoff stretch, where Gore could easily have
his way in Weeks 14 and 16 against two teams I expect to struggle
stopping the run, Arizona and Detroit. Initially, the Eagles in
Week 15 appeared to be a buzzkill, but with all the unexpected change
happening on the defensive side of the ball in Philly, even that
matchup looks much less menacing than it did earlier in the summer.
With rookie Michael Crabtree's holdout expected to last longer
than the recession, San Francisco's chances of becoming a dynamic
passing team in 2009 went from slim to none. That isn't to suggest
there isn't any reason to pay attention, though. We have all tired
of waiting on Vernon Davis to fulfill his immense potential, but
for the first time in his four-year career, there is actually
hope for him to deliver on it. Why? Because he has an OC that
is a veteran play caller and knows what a highly athletic TE can
do for an offense. As such, I expect a career year from Davis
across the board, despite all the red that appears on his schedule.
In short, defenses seem to have a much harder time keeping a talented
TE in check than a slightly-above average receiver because most
teams refuse to put their best cover player on a TE. Unfortunately,
I'm not as optimistic about San Francisco's WR corps. Josh Morgan
has all the talent in the world, but I'm not sure I want him serving
as my go-to WR quite yet. Crabtree could one day become that player,
but with each passing day of his holdout, Crabtree becomes that
much more unlikely to contribute in 2009. Lastly, Isaac Bruce
still proved he had a little bit left in the tank last season,
but I really don’t want to count on a WR that turns 37 during
the season who isn't the #1 option in a run-based offense. And,
as luck would have it, the schedule also suggests that it is in
the Niners' best interest to run all day. While I expect Arizona
and Minnesota to be decent vs. the pass, the trouble for San Fran's
passing game begins after the bye with two teams that will blitz
regularly this season (Houston, Indianapolis) followed by two
teams that have been pretty sound zone-based defenses over the
years. Green Bay's defensive backfield also isn't a good matchup
for the Niners' wideouts, which leads us to the end of the fantasy
season when the Niners will struggle to perform well in Seattle
and then face Arizona for the second time in Week 14. As I mentioned
above, Philadelphia may have some struggles against the run, but
the Eagles are much too deep and talented in their defensive backfield
to be carved up by an offense like San Francisco. Detroit may
appear to offer a nice Week 16 alternative for owners in their
title game, but something tells me Gore will be featured in that
contest. For owners looking for a San Francisco WR or TE to contribute,
spend a late-round pick on Davis and thank me later.
Seattle Seahawks |
|
Totals |
STL |
SF |
CHI |
IND |
JAX |
ARI |
bye |
DAL |
DET |
ARI |
MIN |
STL |
SF |
HOU |
TB |
GB |
(Run) |
|
4.6 |
4 |
3.8 |
4.1 |
4 |
4.4 |
|
4 |
4.7 |
4.4 |
3.8 |
4.6 |
4 |
4.3 |
4.2 |
4 |
(Pass) |
|
7.6 |
7 |
6.8 |
6.1 |
7.2 |
6.7 |
|
6.1 |
7.9 |
6.7 |
6.6 |
7.6 |
7 |
7.2 |
7.4 |
6.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Hasselbeck |
3505 |
255 |
230 |
210 |
195 |
245 |
240 |
|
175 |
275 |
225 |
305 |
225 |
240 |
275 |
190 |
220 |
TD |
17 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
INT |
11 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Jones |
1055 |
75 |
45 |
80 |
60 |
75 |
100 |
|
85 |
105 |
35 |
40 |
85 |
65 |
85 |
70 |
50 |
Ru TD |
5 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Re Yards |
125 |
10 |
20 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
|
10 |
5 |
0 |
20 |
5 |
10 |
10 |
0 |
20 |
Re TD |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
21 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doug Duckett |
335 |
30 |
15 |
10 |
30 |
25 |
10 |
|
10 |
25 |
55 |
10 |
25 |
20 |
10 |
35 |
25 |
Ru TD |
8 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Re Yards |
30 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
5 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
Re TD |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
6 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Forsett |
175 |
15 |
25 |
0 |
20 |
15 |
10 |
|
20 |
0 |
5 |
15 |
15 |
25 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
Ru TD |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Re Yards |
210 |
15 |
10 |
15 |
15 |
0 |
20 |
|
5 |
25 |
30 |
15 |
20 |
10 |
30 |
0 |
0 |
Re TD |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
33 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
|
1 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Doug Houshmandzadeh |
1070 |
70 |
80 |
65 |
55 |
70 |
75 |
|
45 |
100 |
60 |
105 |
70 |
55 |
85 |
60 |
75 |
Re TD |
7 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Rec |
87 |
7 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
|
4 |
6 |
4 |
10 |
6 |
5 |
7 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Branch |
395 |
30 |
10 |
25 |
30 |
0 |
20 |
|
35 |
45 |
20 |
30 |
25 |
55 |
40 |
0 |
30 |
Re TD |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
28 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
|
3 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N Burleson |
525 |
40 |
25 |
30 |
45 |
35 |
50 |
|
20 |
55 |
70 |
45 |
0 |
0 |
30 |
50 |
30 |
Re TD |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
45 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
|
2 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Butler |
365 |
25 |
40 |
15 |
0 |
55 |
20 |
|
10 |
25 |
0 |
30 |
50 |
30 |
15 |
40 |
10 |
Re TD |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
Rec |
33 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
|
1 |
2 |
0 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Carlson |
785 |
65 |
45 |
50 |
50 |
75 |
55 |
|
45 |
20 |
35 |
60 |
55 |
75 |
65 |
40 |
50 |
Re TD |
6 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Rec |
63 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
|
5 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
3 |
4 |
|
If there is an offense that is walking on more pins and needles
than the Seahawks this season, I'm not sure who it is. Matt Hasselbeck's
back issues appear to be resolved, but anyone who knows anything
about back pain knows that bulging disks can resurface at any point.
Similarly, LT Walter Jones' microfracture surgery in December delayed
his return to the field until August 13. He'll need to quickly build
chemistry with likely new LG Rob Sims, who is slotted to fill in
there after Mike Wahle's surprising retirement announcement. C Chris
Spencer is back healthy after recovering from a season-ending herniated
disk injury and is in much the same boat as Hasselbeck in terms
of reliability. RG appears to be a two-man battle between Mansfield
Wrotto and second-round rookie Max Unger. That is, unless the team
decides to move Ray Willis, who is competing for the right tackle
position with Sean Locklear, inside to guard. Last but not least,
it seems as though the entire WR corps is coming back from injury,
except free agent pickup T.J. Houshmandzadeh. For those that weren't
counting, that is seven of the 11 offensive positions that are up
in the air, due mostly to injury concerns. And worse, given the
lack of depth at QB and on the offensive line, this offense could
be sunk if any one player goes down for an extended amount of time.
For now, however, we will have to assume each player is ready to
give Seattle a full year and avoid the same rash of injuries that
struck the team in 2008. Houshmandzadeh and TE John Carlson are
the clear go-to guys in the passing game and are the only receivers
worth the attention of most fantasy owners this summer because new
OC Greg Knapp has a long and distinguished history of getting a
lot of his ground game. Nate Burleson, Deion Branch and rookie Deon
Butler could all chip in from time to time, but this offense will
be mostly about Housh and Carlson converting third downs. Judging
by the schedule, only Chicago, Indianapolis and Dallas appear to
be somewhat formidable against the pass, with the last of that trio
meeting Seattle in Week 8. Certainly, Arizona, Minnesota and Green
Bay could have all been thrown into that mix as well, but when healthy,
Seattle still has enough talent to overcome that trio of borderline
pass defenses. The point is that the Seahawks may be able to enjoy
unexpected production from the passing game throughout the entire
second half of the season, making Houshmandzadeh a decent fantasy
WR2 option and Carlson a highly underrated TE1.
Since I covered the offensive line issues in the paragraph above,
I'll move right into the RB situation. Surprisingly, former HC
Mike Holmgren's offense was pretty balanced a season ago (53-47
pass-to-run ratio). With Knapp now in charge, that ratio may very
well get reversed, especially if the defense can play up to its
potential. Much as he wants no dominant receiver in the passing
game, Knapp does not necessarily want to see one back get the
overwhelming majority of work on the ground either, which will
probably change my previous prediction of Julius Jones receiving
60% of the carries, T.J. Duckett 30% and Justin Forsett 10%. Since
Duckett appears to be the clear goal-line back, I'm now hard-pressed
to forecast Jones being the most valuable fantasy RB on his own
team. If I had to bet, I would say he would be, but even if the
split goes down to something like 50-35-15, Jones ends up losing
50 carries over the course of the season if the team runs 500
times in 2009, shedding nearly 200 yards from his projected total.
And it's a shame if it comes to that because the Seahawks' new
zone-blocking scheme should complement Jones' skill set well.
Just like a couple of their division rivals' schedules, the Seahawks'
slate is one that should allow them to have some success on the
ground. Outside of Minnesota in Week 11, no elite run-stopping
units appear on the schedule, although Chicago and Dallas have
the team speed and personnel necessary to be stingy vs. the run.
Tampa Bay and Green Bay may also have things figured out against
the run by the time the fantasy playoffs roll around, but the
real reasons to be extremely patient in drafting Seattle RBs this
year are: 1) the three-back system they will be using and 2) the
unsure nature of the offensive line. While Knapp's track record
for getting results from the running game is well-known around
the league, Seattle is walking on an extremely thin tightrope
hoping that the offensive line stays healthy. As a result, I would
consider Jones as a low-end fantasy RB3 capable of a 1,000-yard
season and Duckett as a mid-level RB4 capable of a 10-TD season. |