| NFC South & NFC West Breakdowns
 8/18/09
 
 NFC South: ATL 
              | CAR | NO | TB
 NFC West: ARI 
              | STL | SF | SEA
 
 With the offseason now a distant memory, I feel compelled to perform 
              my due diligence and encourage each of you to take in as much preseason 
              action as possible - something that has become more possible than 
              I could have ever imagined since the NFL Network will show all 65 
              games over the next four weeks. No, I’m not a sucker for “meaningless” 
              football; I have learned over the years to enter each exhibition 
              contest with a plan. In some games, I want to know if/when and where 
              a team is pulling its feature back. In others, I want to see if 
              a rookie WR looks crisp going in and coming out of his breaks and 
              if a veteran RB coming off an injury appears to have the same burst 
              he had pre-injury. Sometimes, I may go into a preseason game with 
              an eye towards the defense, for instance, how well a certain team 
              is transitioning from a 4-3 to a 3-4 defense.
 Just like any coach, I tend to believe the preseason is the time 
                to seek evidence to back up the opinions we formed on players 
                during the offseason and, over the course of the next few weeks, 
                finalize decisions about a player's ability to help our fantasy 
                teams for the upcoming season. Like many other fantasy owners, 
                I am primarily interested in Week 3 of the preseason (which most 
                teams treat as a dress rehearsal for Opening Week, making it the 
                most realistic barometer of a team before the start of the actual 
                regular season). That doesn't mean that every other exhibition 
                is useless and, as such, I plan to take in every single preseason 
                game I can. Another benefit of embracing the preseason is taking 
                stock in some of the deep sleepers or potential fantasy wildcards. 
                For example, Bernard 
                Scott, James 
                Davis and Danny 
                Ware may mean very little to 95% of owners out there right 
                now, but I bet most of those same owners will be the ones kicking 
                themselves for not watching those young bucks in August if Cedric 
                Benson, Jamal Lewis and Brandon Jacobs succumbs to a season-ending 
                injury early in the season. By now, each of you knows the drill as it relates to the PSA 
                breakdowns. While this week ends our month-long tour of each division 
                and how the schedule affects each team inside it, the next two 
                weeks will be focused on getting everyone as prepared as humanly 
                possible for all their late-August and early-September drafts 
                with the release of my PPR and non-PPR "Big Boards". As for this article, once again, bear in mind that while the 
                final projections are important, they are 15-game totals because 
                most fantasy seasons have 15 games. For those unfamiliar with 
                the way I project player stats and individual week-to-week consistency 
                (or for those who need a refresher), please give PSA: 
                RB article a read for an introductory course in Preseason 
                Schedule Analysis. By now, I'm hoping that each of you have a 
                pretty good understanding of my methodology, so let's see how 
                the NFC South and NFC West shake down in 2009. Note: The grey 
                highlight in each team’s schedule reflects a road game. NFC SOUTH 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Atlanta Falcons |  
                        |  | Totals | MIA | CAR | NE | bye | SF | CHI | DAL | NO | WAS | CAR | NYG | TB | PHI | NO | NYJ | BUF |   
                  | (Run) |  | 4.3 | 4.4 | 3.9 |  | 4 | 3.8 | 4 | 4.1 | 3.7 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 4 | 4.1 | 3.8 | 4.5 |   
                  | (Pass) |  | 7.2 | 6.3 | 6.2 |  | 7 | 6.8 | 6.1 | 6.7 | 6 | 6.3 | 6.6 | 7.4 | 6.4 | 6.7 | 6.5 | 7.4 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | M Ryan | 3710 | 235 | 220 | 285 |  | 265 | 240 | 260 | 330 | 230 | 210 | 190 | 260 | 250 | 295 | 180 | 260 |   
                  | TD | 21 | 1 | 1 | 3 |  | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 |   
                  | INT | 11 | 1 | 0 | 2 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | M Turner | 1265 | 80 | 110 | 55 |  | 70 | 105 | 65 | 70 | 45 | 90 | 75 | 120 | 100 | 105 | 50 | 125 |   
                  | Ru TD | 13 | 1 | 2 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |   
                  | Re Yards | 45 | 0 | 5 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Re TD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | J Norwood | 375 | 25 | 10 | 25 |  | 40 | 20 | 35 | 10 | 30 | 55 | 15 | 25 | 0 | 45 | 10 | 30 |   
                  | Ru TD | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Re Yards | 335 | 20 | 15 | 40 |  | 25 | 10 | 25 | 60 | 25 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 25 | 20 | 25 | 15 |   
                  | Re TD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 44 | 3 | 2 | 5 |  | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 2 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | R White | 1280 | 95 | 65 | 110 |  | 100 | 85 | 70 | 120 | 55 | 85 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 90 | 35 | 120 |   
                  | Re TD | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                  | Rec | 83 | 6 | 5 | 8 |  | 7 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 6 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | M Jenkins | 730 | 50 | 60 | 40 |  | 65 | 45 | 50 | 40 | 45 | 45 | 30 | 60 | 40 | 75 | 45 | 40 |   
                  | Re TD | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 64 | 4 | 6 | 3 |  | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 3 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | B Finneran | 380 | 10 | 30 | 20 |  | 20 | 30 | 40 | 35 | 45 | 25 | 0 | 30 | 25 | 40 | 15 | 15 |   
                  | Re TD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 30 | 1 | 2 | 3 |  | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | T Gonzalez | 940 | 60 | 45 | 75 |  | 55 | 70 | 65 | 70 | 60 | 55 | 50 | 100 | 45 | 60 | 60 | 70 |   
                  | Re TD | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |   
                  | Rec | 77 | 5 | 3 | 5 |  | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 5 |  |  Gone for Michael 
              Turner's life are the weaker defenses of the NFC North and AFC 
              West (Minnesota and Chicago finished in the top 10 vs. the run and 
              only San Diego joined them in the top half of the league in 2008). 
              Instead, he has the unfortunate task of putting on an encore performance 
              against the NFC and AFC East this season. By comparison, five of 
              the eight teams on the Falcons' new schedule were top-10 rush defenses 
              in 2008 and only Buffalo did not finish in the top half of the league 
              stopping the run. Granted, this year's rankings vs. the run won't 
              be a carbon copy of last year's, but it's hard to argue that Turner 
              didn't take advantage of a weaker schedule as he gained 909 of 1,699 
              rushing yards and scored of his nine of his 17 TDs last season in 
              the eight games vs. the NFC North and AFC West. (Add in the Falcons' 
              game against one of the league's worst rush defenses in St. Louis 
              in Week 17 last season and those totals spike to 1,117 and 10. Put 
              into further context, Atlanta played each of the six teams that 
              gave up 20+ rushing TDs last season. By comparison, this season, 
              the Falcons play seven games against the ten stingiest teams in 
              that category from a season ago.) Unlike a comparable back in Adrian 
              Peterson - in terms of their fantasy contributions coming from just 
              their rushing totals - Turner does not have a similarly talented 
              offensive line or the Vikings' defense that allows Minnesota to 
              run "All Day". As such, I am no fan of "The Burner" or his ability 
              to live up to his average draft position of 1.3. In fact, with his 
              five red matchups, I'm having a hard time endorsing Turner as a 
              first-round fantasy pick this season, especially in PPR leagues! 
              It is only due to his incredible talent and the fact the Falcons 
              traded for an all-around TE like Tony 
              Gonzalez that I am projecting the numbers for Turner that I 
              have.
 Matt Ryan may have improved by leaps and bounds over his Rookie 
                of the Year campaign, unfortunately, so has his schedule. The 
                same slate that helped Turner to a huge breakout season is the 
                same one that allowed Ryan to dissect his NFC North and AFC West 
                opponents for 10 TDs and just four INTs in 2008. Certainly, it 
                hasn't been lost on me that Atlanta acquired Gonzalez, a player 
                that should go a long way in helping Ryan to maintain that 5:2 
                TD/INT ratio, but forgive if I'm not exactly ready to sell the 
                farm to secure the second-year QB's services in 2009. While the 
                passing game's schedule is a bit easier to take than the running 
                game's, all four NFC East teams finished in the top eight of the 
                league vs. the pass last season and it could be argued that maybe 
                only the Eagles have taken a step back. By comparison, Oakland 
                finished 10th - in large part to teams running the ball so effectively 
                against them - while the rest of the AFC West finished 26th or 
                worst.) Furthermore, I'm not crazy about Ryan having field days 
                against the Patriots, Dolphins or Jets, the last of which he faces 
                in Week 15. Ryan has a bright future in this league, so I feel 
                like I have taken that into account by giving him the benefit 
                of the doubt with his final numbers, but that doesn't mean I'm 
                eyeing him as much more than a low-end fantasy QB1 in 2009. Although 
                Harry Douglas didn't exactly set the world on fire with a 22-314-1 
                line in his rookie season, his absence is going to give Atlanta 
                one less advantage in the matchup game each week as Brian Finneran 
                isn't anywhere close to the same WR that Douglas is, especially 
                in the slot. Taking into account Douglas' season-ending injury, 
                it turns out I gave Michael Jenkins a pretty healthy boost over 
                the numbers I had for him previously. Fortunately, Roddy White's 
                holdout was brief, meaning his final numbers shouldn't suffer 
                much, if at all. It's a good thing, too, because a less talented 
                combo than Ryan-to-White would need every snap possible to successfully 
                navigate an early-season schedule that includes seven difficult 
                matchups over the first 10 games. And the stretch run doesn't 
                get much easier for White as he will likely run up against Asante 
                Samuel in Week 13 and Darrelle Revis in Week 15. Long story short, 
                as tempting as it is to latch on to Falcons' offensive players 
                this season, I'm not seeing the offensive line talent, a play-caller 
                savvy enough to adjust to the more difficult defenses he will 
                face this season or the schedule necessary to warrant all the 
                buzz. While I believe Atlanta has the talent in place now to overcome 
                some of its difficult matchups this season, I don't foresee the 
                Falcons building the necessary offensive chemistry to overcome 
                this kind of schedule until next season.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Carolina Panthers |   
                  |  | Totals | PHI | ATL | DAL | bye | WAS | TB | BUF | ARI | NO | ATL | MIA | NYJ | TB | NE | MIN | NYG |   
                  | (Run) |  | 4 | 4.6 | 4 |  | 3.7 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.8 |   
                  | (Pass) |  | 6.4 | 7.1 | 6.1 |  | 6 | 7.4 | 7.4 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 7.1 | 7.2 | 6.5 | 7.4 | 6.2 | 6.6 | 6.6 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | J Delhomme | 3080 | 170 | 225 | 225 |  | 175 | 230 | 245 | 195 | 200 | 185 | 220 | 175 | 220 | 270 | 185 | 160 |   
                  | TD | 20 | 0 | 2 | 2 |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | INT | 13 | 1 | 2 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | D Williams | 1120 | 80 | 100 | 65 |  | 40 | 115 | 65 | 120 | 45 | 55 | 105 | 50 | 85 | 65 | 55 | 75 |   
                  | Ru TD | 11 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |   
                  | Re Yards | 150 | 10 | 0 | 5 |  | 5 | 5 | 25 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 30 | 5 | 20 |   
                  | Re TD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 23 | 2 | 0 | 2 |  | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | J Stewart | 840 | 45 | 65 | 80 |  | 60 | 45 | 40 | 25 | 70 | 100 | 40 | 55 | 65 | 45 | 45 | 60 |   
                  | Ru TD | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                  | Re Yards | 120 | 5 | 0 | 5 |  | 10 | 5 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 25 | 15 | 15 | 5 |   
                  | Re TD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 19 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | S Smith | 1360 | 55 | 125 | 80 |  | 90 | 125 | 110 | 70 | 85 | 85 | 120 | 40 | 115 | 110 | 80 | 70 |   
                  | Re TD | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 93 | 4 | 9 | 6 |  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 5 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | M Muhammad | 765 | 55 | 60 | 75 |  | 30 | 50 | 65 | 75 | 35 | 50 | 30 | 65 | 35 | 75 | 40 | 25 |   
                  | Re TD | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 60 | 4 | 4 | 5 |  | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 2 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | D Jarrett | 585 | 35 | 40 | 55 |  | 40 | 30 | 40 | 35 | 50 | 25 | 45 | 55 | 45 | 30 | 35 | 25 |   
                  | Re TD | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 49 | 3 | 4 | 5 |  | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | J King | 100 | 10 | 0 | 5 |  | 0 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 15 |   
                  | Re TD | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 16 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |  |  If the fantasy football world thought that my analysis of the Falcons' 
              schedule (and what it means for Turner's 2009 prospects) was harsh, 
              wait until they get a taste of my thoughts on last year's true breakout 
              performer, DeAngelo 
              Williams. Unlike Turner, Williams has a ready-made excuse for 
              2009, that is, if Jonathan 
              Stewart can ever get fully healthy again. A healthy Stewart 
              will likely lead to a full season of Williams' first-half production 
              from a season ago (more on that below) whereas an unhealthy Stewart 
              could free up Williams to have another huge season. But before Williams' 
              owners start sticking pins into their Stewart voodoo dolls (or vice 
              versa), consider this for a second: through the Panthers' Week 9 
              bye last season, Williams had a modest five total TDs and two 100-yard 
              games. Then, over the final eight games - five of which were against 
              the worst eight rush defenses (Lions - worst, Raiders - 31st, Broncos 
              - 27th, Packers - 26th, Falcons - 25th), he tripled both totals, 
              capped off by a career-defining four-score outburst in Week 16 vs. 
              the Giants. While that was an impressive performance by any stretch 
              of the imagination, the Giants' defense wasn’t nearly the animal 
              it had been for that game and during the entire month of December. 
              (The season’s final month was so hard on the Giants that they allowed 
              all three of their 100-yards rushing performances and nine of the 
              defense's 15 total TDs vs. opposing RBs - very few fantasy owners 
              could have foreseen Plaxico Burress shooting himself in the leg 
              and the affect it was going to have on both sides of the ball.) 
              The point is that much like the Falcons’ Turner, Williams and Stewart 
              won't have a lot of opportunity to beat up on the same weaklings 
              this season as they did in 2008. Case in point - the run up to and 
              during the fantasy playoffs for the Panthers this season, in my 
              opinion, is more difficult for them than any other team in the league. 
              First, in Week 12, Carolina travels to New York to take on the Jets 
              before getting an average matchup at best at home vs. the Bucs. 
              Then, the Panthers head to New England in Week 14 before hosting 
              Minnesota in Week 15 and taking another trip to New York to meet 
              the Giants in Week 16. Because their offensive line is such a good 
              run-blocking unit, I'm not swearing off the Panthers' potential 
              for RB production completely during the fantasy postseason, but 
              understand there is plenty of risk for any owner investing a high 
              pick in Williams or Stewart this season: 1) Each of Carolina's offensive 
              linemen missed at least one game last season, but unlike 2008, there 
              is very little proven or experienced depth behind them; 2) the fact 
              that Williams and Stewart have someone as talented as each other 
              to compete with for touches makes counting on either all season 
              very dicey and; 3) the aforementioned schedule looks nice with one 
              red matchup through Week 11, but ends rather unceremoniously.
 Since Steve 
                Smith's true breakout season (2003) that established him as 
                one of the league's best wideouts, he has amassed 6,312 receiving 
                yards. To put that into some perspective, that total is nearly 
                33% of Carolina's total receiving yardage over that time. If we 
                throw out the 2004 season in which Smith was injured for the season 
                in the first game and posted just 60 of the team's 3,643 total 
                receiving yards, Smith is responsible for over 40% of the team's 
                yards gained through the air! Needless to say, the Panthers' passing 
                game begins and ends with the mighty mite. Fortunately for him 
                and his fantasy owners, Smith has proved not only to be one of 
                the league's toughest receivers over that time, but also one of 
                the few players in the league who is essentially what I like to 
                call "matchup-proof". Considering what he has to go up against 
                in the fantasy playoffs this season, he figures to give that moniker 
                a good run for its money. Cold-weather contests in New England 
                in Week 14 and in New York against the Giants in Week 16 don't 
                project to be high-yardage games for anybody. However, if we have 
                learned one things over the years (and the numbers above prove 
                it), Jake 
                Delhomme isn't against force-feeding the ball to Smith. So 
                while I'm not crazy about how his fantasy season winds down, I'm 
                really only concerned with Smith's ability to produce solid fantasy 
                totals in Week 1 vs. Philly's Asante 
                Samuel and in Week 12 vs. the Jets Darrelle 
                Revis. Outside of Smith, the schedule looks absolutely brutal 
                for the secondary players in the passing game. While Dwayne 
                Jarrett is getting hyped as a player ready to push Muhsin 
                Muhammad for a starting spot, both players will probably negate 
                the other for touches while trying to overcome seven red matchups 
                on the schedule on a team that wants to run the ball all day long. 
                To be quite honest, I'd be quite surprised -barring injury - if 
                either Muhammad or Jarrett lived up to the numbers I have projected 
                for them here, but as always, I try to imagine the best-case scenario 
                first and work back from there. Lastly, with my feelings pretty 
                clear on the difficulty of Carolina's schedule, I can't really 
                endorse Delhomme as anything more than a bye-week fill-in. He'll 
                have his moments in the first half of the season, but he'll really 
                have to raise his game to excel in December.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | New Orleans Saints |  
                  |  | Totals | DET | PHI | BUF | NYJ | bye | NYG | MIA | ATL | CAR | STL | TB | NE | WAS | ATL | DAL | TB |   
                  | (Run) |  | 4.7 | 4 | 4.5 | 3.8 |  | 3.8 | 4.3 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.2 | 3.9 | 3.7 | 4.6 | 4 | 4.2 |   
                  | (Pass) |  | 7.9 | 6.4 | 7.4 | 6.5 |  | 6.6 | 7.2 | 7.1 | 6.3 | 7.6 | 7.4 | 6.2 | 6 | 7.1 | 6.1 | 7.4 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | D Brees | 4370 | 305 | 205 | 320 | 260 |  | 285 | 305 | 285 | 280 | 265 | 315 | 325 | 255 | 350 | 280 | 335 |   
                  | TD | 31 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 |  | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 |   
                  | INT | 13 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | R Bush | 560 | 50 | 30 | 55 | 25 |  | 35 | 50 | 70 | 50 | 0 | 40 | 20 | 0 | 55 | 35 | 45 |   
                  | Ru TD | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | Re Yards | 540 | 75 | 25 | 45 | 50 |  | 30 | 45 | 65 | 15 | 0 | 25 | 40 | 0 | 35 | 30 | 60 |   
                  | Re TD | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 66 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 6 |  | 4 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 7 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | P Thomas | 1055 | 80 | 50 | 90 | 55 |  | 60 | 70 | 50 | 70 | 115 | 65 | 50 | 75 | 80 | 60 | 85 |   
                  | Ru TD | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Re Yards | 260 | 10 | 10 | 25 | 35 |  | 25 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 25 | 5 | 15 | 10 |   
                  | Re TD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                  | Rec | 32 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |  | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | M Colston | 1210 | 90 | 55 | 105 | 40 |  | 75 | 90 | 100 | 60 | 110 | 100 | 75 | 60 | 125 | 40 | 85 |   
                  | Re TD | 11 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |   
                  | Rec | 87 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 4 |  | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 3 | 7 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | L Moore | 900 | 55 | 65 | 50 | 40 |  | 45 | 60 | 40 | 100 | 55 | 65 | 85 | 45 | 60 | 75 | 60 |   
                  | Re TD | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 74 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 |  | 5 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 6 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | D Henderson | 410 | 30 | 0 | 30 | 30 |  | 55 | 25 | 0 | 40 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 60 | 35 | 25 | 30 |   
                  | Re TD | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |  | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | R Meachem | 460 | 15 | 20 | 40 | 20 |  | 30 | 50 | 40 | 15 | 0 | 40 | 50 | 25 | 20 | 60 | 35 |   
                  | Re TD | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 32 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |  | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | J Shockey | 590 | 30 | 30 | 25 | 45 |  | 25 | 15 | 40 | 30 | 45 | 45 | 60 | 40 | 70 | 35 | 55 |   
                  | Re TD | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 50 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 |  | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 4 |  |  Remember the saying, "one of these is not like the others"? 
              It sure fits nicely for the Saints, who are a high-volume passing 
              team in a running division. Certainly, when Drew Brees is the triggerman, 
              it makes sense to drop back and throw all day long. HC Sean Payton's 
              offense is set up for the QB to have fantasy success with a 60-40 
              pass-run ratio over his first three years as New Orleans' head coach. 
              But as is the case with any player, weaknesses can be found if a 
              person digs deep enough. Brees’ 11:12 TD:INT road split in 
              2008 overshadowed an incredible 23:5 home split and ran completely 
              contrary to his usual success away from the Superdome (33:10 TD:INT 
              split in first two years as a Saint). Most of the reasons for this 
              downturn were out of his control (Marques Colston's injury and an 
              inconsistent defense that often forced the team into shootouts are 
              two good examples). With those two problems and several others seemingly 
              resolved, it would come as little surprise if Brees wasn't a more 
              consistent QB this season. However, with the running game and defense 
              both upgraded, I'm not sure another run at Dan Marino's single-season 
              passing yardage mark is in the cards this season. (No worries though, 
              Brees' worst passing-yardage season since joining New Orleans is 
              4,418 yards in 2006.) Fortunately, Brees has Colston back and Lance 
              Moore returning from his career-best season and a schedule that 
              is challenging in the middle, but pretty advantageous on the edges, 
              especially during the fantasy playoffs. The ex-San Diego QB, who 
              threw for 24 TDs vs. eight picks in nine indoor games a season ago, 
              and his entourage finish the fantasy season with three straight 
              dome games, starting off vs. a tame Falcons' pass defense before 
              wrapping up with a pair of home games vs. Dallas and Tampa Bay. 
              Because both opponents will be running teams this season, New Orleans 
              will likely be focused on jumping out to an early lead via the passing 
              game. And for fantasy owners, that is not all the good news. As 
              Brees and Payton showed us on several occasions last season, New 
              Orleans isn't afraid to keep the pedal down once it gets a lead. 
              And if we are to believe Brees and Colston, former first-rounder 
              Robert Meachem is ready to join the parade. With Moore recovering 
              from shoulder surgery and the third-year WR drawing "most impressive 
              player in camp" praise, this may be the year to invest a late-round 
              pick in Meachem in hopes he can assume Devery Henderson's deep-ball 
              role and possibly more.
 As I have mentioned in this space before, despite a 60-40 pass-run 
                ratio since Payton took over the Saints in 2006, New Orleans' 
                RBs have finished third, tenth and fourth in team fantasy points 
                scored (according to traditional, non-PPR scoring) - an amazing 
                stat considering that 2006 was the only season in which their 
                backs have surpassed 400 carries. The point is that despite such 
                a pass-heavy approach, New Orleans can still give fantasy owners 
                two fantasy-worthy RBs because a fair amount of Brees' attempts 
                are swing or screen passes. (I'll be the first to admit that as 
                difficult as it is to project the season like I attempt to do, 
                trying to forecast how often Brees will opt to dump it off to 
                Reggie Bush or Pierre Thomas is nearly impossible.) Although this 
                team will be a passing team for as long as Brees and Payton are 
                working in tandem, it is not lost on the head coach to use his 
                RBs when the Saints get into scoring position. Since 2006, New 
                Orleans RBs have accounted for 41 of the 66 TDs (rushing or receiving) 
                from inside the five-yard line, which may not sound like much 
                to a "normal" team, but to one which is so heavily predisposed 
                toward airing it out, it is notable considering the Saints have 
                a player such as Marques Colston who is a mismatch for just about 
                any CB in the league in the red zone. Turning to the 2009 schedule, 
                it's amazing that even though the Saints play many of the same 
                opponents as the rest of the NFC South does, there is reason to 
                be more optimistic about Thomas and Bush. First off, the Saints 
                start off the season with two positive matchups and one neutral 
                one - a stretch that should allow the offense to build some trust 
                in the ground attack. A bye is sandwiched by a pair of home games 
                vs. both New York teams, but then New Orleans should enjoy a fairly 
                productive five-week run. While New England and Washington will 
                probably keep the New Orleans running game in check, both games 
                come right before the start of the fantasy playoffs in Week 12-13. 
                A Week 14 tilt at Atlanta could easily be a shootout before they 
                close out the fantasy season at home with two straight neutral 
                matchups. While I gave Dallas the benefit of the doubt on stopping 
                the run against the Saints, I'm not sure either the Cowboys or 
                Bucs will be all that effective stopping any part of the New Orleans 
                offense in the Superdome. Admittedly, the Saints don't have the 
                easiest schedule to run against, but it does offer plenty of opportunity 
                for the team to rely on the ground game more often than they have 
                in the past. 
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Tampa Bay Buccaneers |   
                  |  | Totals | DAL | BUF | NYG | WAS | PHI | CAR | NE | bye | GB | MIA | NO | ATL | CAR | NYJ | SEA | NO |   
                  | (Run) |  | 4 | 4.5 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 4 | 4.4 | 3.9 |  | 4 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 4.1 |   
                  | (Pass) |  | 6.1 | 7.4 | 6.6 | 6 | 6.4 | 6.3 | 6.2 |  | 6.8 | 7.2 | 6.7 | 7.1 | 6.3 | 6.5 | 7 | 6.7 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | B Leftwich | 3140 | 210 | 240 | 210 | 185 | 200 | 195 | 225 |  | 215 | 175 | 265 | 220 | 180 | 185 | 205 | 230 |   
                  | TD | 14 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |   
                  | INT | 15 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | D Ward | 975 | 50 | 80 | 55 | 80 | 40 | 70 | 75 |  | 55 | 85 | 60 | 100 | 50 | 70 | 40 | 65 |   
                  | Ru TD | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Re Yards | 300 | 15 | 20 | 40 | 10 | 40 | 20 | 10 |  | 5 | 0 | 30 | 20 | 15 | 45 | 15 | 15 |   
                  | Re TD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 45 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 2 |  | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 3 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | E Graham | 695 | 45 | 35 | 30 | 25 | 75 | 50 | 30 |  | 60 | 45 | 70 | 40 | 75 | 20 | 40 | 55 |   
                  | Ru TD | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                  | Re Yards | 105 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 15 |  | 15 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 10 |   
                  | Re TD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 16 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | A Bryant | 865 | 50 | 80 | 40 | 70 | 35 | 60 | 85 |  | 30 | 75 | 85 | 55 | 45 | 25 | 60 | 70 |   
                  | Re TD | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 63 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 |  | 2 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | M Clayton | 420 | 25 | 45 | 30 | 40 | 30 | 20 | 0 |  | 40 | 15 | 30 | 35 | 15 | 50 | 15 | 30 |   
                  | Re TD | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 39 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 |  | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 |   
                  | B Clark/ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | S Stroughter | 555 | 40 | 30 | 55 | 15 | 25 | 45 | 60 |  | 45 | 25 | 35 | 15 | 55 | 30 | 35 | 45 |   
                  | Re TD | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                  | Rec | 46 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 |  | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 3 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | K Winslow | 895 | 75 | 65 | 40 | 35 | 60 | 50 | 55 |  | 80 | 60 | 75 | 90 | 50 | 30 | 70 | 60 |   
                  | Re TD | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                  | Rec | 80 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 6 |  | 6 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 5 |  |  Because the Bucs will be a running team this season - more than 
              they have been since the turn of the century - it makes sense to 
              start there first. A quick glance at the schedule reveals that I 
              am not a big fan of their ability to produce consistently this season. 
              The odd thing is that unlike most teams, I don't feel Tampa Bay's 
              lack of RB production this season will be due to a lack of "running 
              game talent". What I mean by that is that generally I can attribute 
              a RB's lack of numbers to an offensive line, a bad scheme or a poor 
              defense more often than not - none of which I feel apply here. Let's 
              start with the roles Earnest Graham and Derrick Ward will play in 
              the offense this season. If I had to guess at this moment, I imagine 
              that Ward will win a 60-40 or 65-35 split of the touches coming 
              out of the Bucs backfield, but Graham will emerge as the goal-line 
              "vulture". If this is the way it actually plays out, Ward 
              becomes no better than a decent fantasy RB3 in non-PPR leagues (or 
              low-end RB2 in PPR) while Graham is probably a serviceable RB3 in 
              non-PPR and RB4 in PPR. The problem is that both players have the 
              size to stand up to the goal-line punishment and good enough hands 
              to be threats in the passing game. However, with the struggles the 
              passing game is likely to encounter, Graham and Ward will consistently 
              face eight in the box. Let's also not forget that the offensive 
              line is transitioning to a zone-based blocking scheme after years 
              of man-blocking and the schedule certainly does not allow much room 
              for error early on. In their first five games, the Bucs face all 
              four NFC East teams with only a road game at Buffalo serving as 
              an opportunity for Ward and Graham to get it going. After that difficult 
              stretch is over, Tampa Bay hosts both Carolina and New England before 
              heading into its Week 8 bye. What this means is Ward and Graham 
              may have only two real shots at fantasy success through half of 
              the fantasy season. Coming out of the off-week, the red matchups 
              pretty much stop but games against the Packers, Dolphins and Saints 
              don't inspire much confidence in a ground-it-out approach for several 
              different reasons. Assuming Ward and Graham owners get to the point 
              where they are still holding on to their backs, a difficult three-game 
              stretch during the fantasy playoffs awaits them. The Jets figure 
              to stop the run again this season and, after that, the Bucs cap 
              off the fantasy season by playing road games in Seattle and New 
              Orleans, both of which I expect to be much more respectable vs. 
              the run this season. What it all boils down to is that while I have 
              Tampa Bay down for four red matchups, the final tally might show 
              it was more like eight or nine. In essence, not all "neutral" 
              matchups are created equal.
 As bad as things look for the running game, it's not exactly 
                a walk in the park for the passing game either. It's hard to like 
                Antonio Bryant going off against the likes of Terence Newman, 
                DeAngelo Hall or Asante Samuel this season, just to name a few. 
                In fact, Bryant may be hard-pressed to put together more than 
                one fantasy WR3-type performance over the first half of the season, 
                a notion that is completely unacceptable for a number of owners 
                who expect a repeat of last season. While new OC Jeff Jagodzinski's 
                new offense will be feature more downfield passing than did Jon 
                Gruden's, "Jags" loves to use his TEs and feature the 
                running game, yet another strike against Bryant. After his nightmarish 
                first-half slate, Bryant could make for a decent buy-low candidate 
                for the second half. However, I just can't foresee him having 
                all that much success in 2009. With Bryant likely to suffer from 
                the blues this season, the weight of the passing game will likely 
                fall onto Kellen Winslow, who was given all the same red marks 
                that Bryant was. Unlike Bryant, Winslow won't be matched up against 
                an opponent's #1 CB, meaning if he can stay healthy, he could 
                put up the same kind of numbers he posted during his finest years 
                in Cleveland in an offense that will feature a young QB (who typically 
                lean on their TEs early on in their careers) and a play-caller 
                that has seemingly always been able to make at least one of his 
                TEs a huge part of his offense. Considering his mid-seventh round 
                ADP, Winslow could end up being a pretty good bargain for those 
                patient owners who want to fill out their WR or RB ranks first 
                but still want top-notch production from a mid-to-late round TE. 
                While I do make mentions of Michael Clayton, Brian Clark and rookie 
                Sammie Stroughter, this new offense - along with a relatively 
                green QB - pretty much ensure that only Bryant and Winslow are 
                worth putting on a fantasy roster. And given that Bryant will 
                rarely get a week away from some of the best DB's in the league, 
                Winslow will need to turn in a Pro Bowl-level performance in 2009 
                if this offense wants to go anywhere this season.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Arizona Cardinals |  
                  |  | Totals | SF | JAX | IND | bye | HOU | SEA | NYG | CAR | CHI | SEA | STL | TEN | MIN | SF | DET | STL |   
                  | (Run) |  | 4 | 4 | 4.1 |  | 4.3 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 4.1 | 3.8 | 4 | 4.7 | 4.6 |   
                  | (Pass) |  | 7 | 7.2 | 6.1 |  | 7.2 | 7 | 6.6 | 6.3 | 6.8 | 7 | 7.6 | 6.5 | 6.6 | 7 | 7.9 | 7.6 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | K Warner | 3380 | 230 | 295 | 245 |  | 245 | 320 | 210 |  |  | 260 | 245 | 180 | 345 | 275 | 235 | 295 |   
                  | TD | 25 | 2 | 2 | 3 |  | 2 | 2 | 1 |  |  | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 |   
                  | INT | 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 3 |  |  | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | M Leinart | 550 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 265 | 285 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | TD | 2 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | INT | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | C Wells | 860 | 40 | 50 | 60 |  | 45 | 65 | 55 | 100 | 40 | 70 | 50 | 35 | 25 | 65 | 110 | 50 |   
                  | Ru TD | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | Re Yards | 110 | 10 | 10 | 10 |  | 0 | 5 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 15 |   
                  | Re TD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 18 | 1 | 1 | 2 |  | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | T Hightower | 580 | 55 | 35 | 25 |  | 35 | 15 | 30 | 45 | 60 | 25 | 75 | 20 | 30 | 50 | 40 | 40 |   
                  | Ru TD | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |   
                  | Re Yards | 195 | 15 | 15 | 5 |  | 10 | 20 | 0 | 25 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 20 | 35 | 15 | 10 | 0 |   
                  | Re TD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 28 | 2 | 2 | 1 |  | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | A Boldin | 1090 | 90 | 80 | 60 |  | 120 | 85 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 110 | 85 | 40 | 70 | 115 | 100 | 70 |   
                  | Re TD | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 90 | 8 | 6 | 6 |  | 10 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 5 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | L Fitzgerald | 1295 | 50 | 105 | 80 |  | 80 | 120 | 50 | 125 | 90 | 90 | 70 | 40 | 130 | 65 | 80 | 120 |   
                  | Re TD | 11 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |   
                  | Rec | 95 | 3 | 8 | 6 |  | 5 | 8 | 4 | 10 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 10 | 5 | 6 | 8 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | S Breaston | 825 | 55 | 45 | 60 |  | 35 | 65 | 85 | 70 | 65 | 30 | 40 | 45 | 60 | 80 | 25 | 65 |   
                  | Re TD | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                  | Rec | 68 | 5 | 4 | 6 |  | 2 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 5 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | J Urban | 415 | 10 | 40 | 30 |  | 0 | 25 | 60 | 45 | 45 | 15 | 40 | 30 | 40 | 0 | 10 | 25 |   
                  | Re TD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 34 | 1 | 3 | 2 |  | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 |  |  Even though I realize the NFL doesn't consider fantasy implications 
              when putting together the schedule, a part of me believes they have 
              a sense of humor. Cleveland gets the benefit of playing Kansas City 
              and Oakland in Weeks 15-16 but don't appear to have the running 
              game necessary to take full advantage of it. As passing game schedules 
              go, the Cardinals have a pretty nice go of it, especially in Weeks 
              14-16; the only problem being how well Kurt Warner's surgerically-repaired 
              hip will hold up. The 38-year-old QB told ESPN prior to Arizona's 
              preseason opener that his hip was bothering him just standing still, 
              but tends to feel better as he becomes more active. Still, Warner 
              turned in his first 16-game season since 2001 last season and is 
              a poor bet to give his owners 16 more, which obviously has a trickle-down 
              affect on the rest of the offense. Thus, this message becomes more 
              of an advertisement to invest a late-round pick in Matt Leinart 
              because it doesn't sound like anyone in their right mind should 
              lean on Warner too heavily. In such a scenario, I'm not sure I would 
              expect all that much of a dropoff based on what I've seen and read 
              coming out of Cardinals' camp about Leinart but I would probably 
              knock Larry Fitzgerald a few spots on my WR rankings. Arizona's 
              transition from former OC Todd Haley to HC Ken Whisenhunt probably 
              affects Steve Breaston the most (as the Cardinals would be hard-pressed 
              to take receptions away from Fitzgerald or Anquan Boldin), but while 
              the Michigan alum probably won't repeat his 1,000-yard season, he 
              remains one of the more attractive non-starting WRs available in 
              fantasy. As I've already touched on, the schedule and how it lays 
              out is favorable to Warner and Leinart, so it becomes a matter of 
              just how much more Whisenhunt will count on the ground game than 
              his predecessor did. Only three clear-cut negative matchups jump 
              out to me, but only the Giants strike me as a defense that could 
              really have their way with the Cardinals' passing game. Otherwise, 
              the first six and last four games of the fantasy season seem awfully 
              appealing for any owner counting on Warner, Fitzgerald or Boldin.
 If we are to use history as a barometer of what Whisenhunt wants 
                to do on offense, it's a good bet that he'll try his best to even 
                out last season's 64-36 pass-to-run ratio, even if he earns a 
                few gray hairs in the process. But first, he'll have to figure 
                out how he wants to handle the tag team of Tim Hightower and Chris 
                "Beanie" Wells. Since the rookie sprained his ankle 
                on the first day of camp, he has been unable to practice, leaving 
                Hightower with all the important reps. What it all means for Wells 
                is that Whisenhunt can't take advantage of the things that his 
                first-round pick does well if he doesn't know what they are, making 
                a return to the practice field this week very important for his 
                hopes of securing a split of the workload in 2009. Believe it 
                or not, even without a noticeable upgrade up front, the RB battle 
                is important for fantasy purposes because of who the Cardinals 
                face during the fantasy playoffs. While I like the Niners' ability 
                to stop the run this season, they will not be an elite unit in 
                that regard. In Weeks 15-16, Arizona faces Detroit and St. Louis, 
                which both have no way to go but up in terms of stopping the run. 
                The Lions (32nd) and Rams (T-28th) featured two of the five worst 
                rush defenses from a season ago, so while Jim Schwartz and Steve 
                Spagnuolo will both do everything in their power to make their 
                teams respectable in those departments, there is no reason to 
                expect drastic improvement from either squad. Of course by then, 
                the RB situation will have been sorted out, but that is much too 
                late for fantasy owners. In my humble opinion, Wells (assuming 
                he doesn't suffer another setback) will grab a slight majority 
                of the carries sometime after the Week 4 bye but will be replaced 
                by a trimmer Hightower in short-yardage situations, much like 
                how he worked with Edgerrin James in 2008. However, I am no longer 
                willing to bet that Wells is this rookie class' lone 300-carry 
                rusher as I was in June.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | St. Louis Rams |   
                  |  | Totals | SEA | WAS | GB | SF | MIN | JAX | IND | DET | bye | NO | ARI | SEA | CHI | TEN | HOU | ARI |   
                  | (Run) |  | 4.2 | 3.7 | 4 | 4 | 3.8 | 4 | 4.1 | 4.7 |  | 4.1 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.4 |   
                  | (Pass) |  | 7 | 6 | 6.8 | 7 | 6.6 | 7.2 | 6.1 | 7.9 |  | 6.7 | 6.7 | 7 | 6.8 | 6.5 | 7.2 | 6.7 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | M Bulger | 3165 | 220 | 245 | 220 | 175 | 225 | 195 | 165 | 255 |  | 195 | 230 | 170 | 235 | 160 | 295 | 180 |   
                  | TD | 15 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 |  | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |   
                  | INT | 15 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | S Jackson | 1220 | 85 | 50 | 75 | 105 | 40 | 85 | 70 | 125 |  | 70 | 105 | 100 | 60 | 75 | 100 | 75 |   
                  | Ru TD | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | Re Yards | 500 | 45 | 30 | 50 | 15 | 75 | 15 | 10 | 35 |  | 45 | 30 | 5 | 40 | 20 | 50 | 35 |   
                  | Re TD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 63 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 3 |  | 5 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 4 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | D Avery | 875 | 40 | 85 | 20 | 60 | 45 | 90 | 30 | 65 |  | 55 | 70 | 30 | 100 | 40 | 110 | 35 |   
                  | Re TD | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 57 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 4 |  | 3 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 2 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | L Robinson | 360 | 45 | 30 | 55 | 15 | 0 | 20 | 20 | 40 |  | 0 | 25 | 70 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Re TD | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 23 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 |  | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | K Burton | 525 | 15 | 40 | 35 | 45 | 25 | 10 | 45 | 50 |  | 25 | 35 | 45 | 0 | 55 | 40 | 60 |   
                  | Re TD | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                  | Rec | 41 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 |  | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | R Curry | 400 | 35 | 25 | 10 | 0 | 45 | 35 | 25 | 50 |  | 20 | 25 | 10 | 25 | 25 | 50 | 20 |   
                  | Re TD | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 35 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 |  | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | R McMichael | 505 | 40 | 35 | 50 | 40 | 35 | 25 | 35 | 15 |  | 50 | 45 | 10 | 30 | 20 | 45 | 30 |   
                  | Re TD | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 46 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 |  | 5 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 |  |  The new coaching staff wasted little time in identifying Steven 
              Jackson as the centerpiece of the offense. And why not? Jackson 
              embodies every element that a coach wants in a franchise back (although 
              his durability has been lacking in recent seasons). The team quickly 
              added promising C Jason Brown from the Ravens and spent the No. 
              2 overall pick in the draft on Baylor T Jason Smith, helping to 
              solidify an offensive line that has been short of quality and quantity 
              for far too long. Given the current state of this franchise, it 
              could be argued that running back and offensive line are now the 
              two strongest parts of this offense. Fortunately, the schedule appears 
              to cater to this development, so as long as Jackson can take it, 
              St. Louis will allow him to carry this offense this season. Given 
              the new West Coast offense that OC Pat Shurmur is bringing over 
              from Philadelphia, it would come as little surprise if Jackson ends 
              up as the team's leading receiver in addition to its rushing leader. 
              And the reports surrounding his offseason work ethic - a sore subject 
              for him at times - couldn't be much more favorable. So while it 
              may be foolish to count on him coming anywhere close to his 436-touch 
              campaign of 2006, it is not unreasonable to think Jackson won't 
              approach 400 touches, with the 90 catches he hauled in during that 
              2006 season a realistic possibility. Although only three green matchups 
              appear on Jackson's schedule, one of them is in Week 16 vs. Arizona. 
              On the other hand, he is faced with only three red matchups, two 
              of which come in the season's first five weeks and the other in 
              Week 13. Certainly, Tennessee in Week 14 isn't a wonderful game 
              for Jackson to pile up the numbers, but I feel he will be motivated 
              to outperform Chris Johnson plus the Titans' approach is grind-it-out, 
              meaning the Rams should be able to hang in longer and stick with 
              the running game. Either way, that's one of the beautiful things 
              about owning the all-purpose backs like Maurice 
              Jones-Drew, Brian Westbrook or Jackson - no matter the margin 
              on the scoreboard, they can and, most likely, will produce because 
              they are their team's best runner and receiver. Those kinds of backs 
              in fantasy are worth their weight in gold.
 Every year, there are a handful of teams that are forced to ask 
                themselves: How did the receiving situation get this bad this 
                quickly? To be brutally honest, Donnie Avery would still be a 
                WR2 understudy on most teams while the collection of Keenan Burton, 
                Laurent Robinson and Ronald Curry would be little more than WR4 
                or WR5 options if they played somewhere else. Don't get me wrong, 
                there is some upside to these receivers, but both Burton and Robinson 
                are green while Curry has had trouble recapturing the form that 
                allowed him to be a 50-catch receiver three different times in 
                this league. Unfortunately, one of those players (two if we are 
                to believe Avery may miss the season opener) will need to start 
                each week. And while the line seems to be doing well blocking 
                for the run so far in camp, there is apparently much reason for 
                concern when Marc Bulger goes back to throw. The Rams QB is still 
                capable of being an above-average triggerman in this league, but 
                one has to wonder just how many more hits he can withstand. This 
                is one of the many reasons why Shurmur was hired to install the 
                West Coast offense, that is, to get the ball out of Bulger's hands 
                quickly and preserve him with an offense heavy on short passes 
                to Randy McMichael and Jackson. Looking at the schedule, the Rams 
                get very few red matchups. But as challenged as this receiving 
                group is right now, I'm not crazy about its chances to exploit 
                many of the neutral matchups either. In fact, I would expect every 
                single defense St. Louis faces in the second half of the season 
                to blitz even more than they would normally. Given the fact the 
                Rams lack a quality playmaker in the open field or down the field 
                (Avery does not qualify as either yet in my mind), St. Louis will 
                find itself struggling to score in several games this season. 
                As such, I believe Avery's 7.12 ADP is a bit high for my liking. 
                In fact, the only fantasy property from this passing game that 
                I expect to live up to his ADP this season is McMichael.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | San Francisco 49ers |  
                  |  | Totals | at ARI | SEA | at MIN | STL | ATL | bye | at HOU | at IND | TEN | CHI | at GB | JAX | at SEA | ARI | at PHI | DET |   
                  | (Run) |  | 4.4 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 4.6 | 4.6 |  | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 3.8 | 4 | 4 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4 | 4.7 |   
                  | (Pass) |  | 6.7 | 7 | 6.6 | 7.6 | 7.1 |  | 7.2 | 6.1 | 6.5 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 7.2 | 7 | 6.7 | 6.4 | 7.9 |   
                  | A Smith/ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | S Hill | 3090 | 205 | 190 | 175 | 225 | 200 |  | 265 | 180 | 195 | 205 | 220 | 190 | 210 | 225 | 210 | 195 |   
                  | TD | 14 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |   
                  | INT | 12 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | Ru Yards | 90 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 0 |  | 15 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 |   
                  | Ru TD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | F Gore | 1365 | 100 | 90 | 130 | 110 | 115 |  | 65 | 80 | 70 | 45 | 80 | 100 | 65 | 80 | 115 | 120 |   
                  | Ru TD | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | Re Yards | 380 | 15 | 35 | 0 | 25 | 30 |  | 40 | 10 | 20 | 60 | 30 | 25 | 30 | 25 | 10 | 25 |   
                  | Re TD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                  | Rec | 53 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 4 |  | 5 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 4 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | G Coffee | 335 | 15 | 15 | 40 | 20 | 10 |  | 30 | 10 | 15 | 35 | 25 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 30 | 40 |   
                  | Ru TD | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                  | Re Yards | 30 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 |   
                  | Re TD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | J Morgan | 730 | 40 | 55 | 55 | 75 | 40 |  | 50 | 35 | 45 | 30 | 70 | 45 | 55 | 45 | 30 | 60 |   
                  | Re TD | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                  | Rec | 60 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 |  | 4 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | I Bruce | 655 | 55 | 40 | 30 | 50 | 35 |  | 45 | 40 | 45 | 50 | 40 | 30 | 55 | 70 | 35 | 35 |   
                  | Re TD | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 52 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 |  | 3 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 3 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | M Crabtree | 440 | 15 | 25 | 10 | 25 | 35 |  | 20 | 30 | 35 | 45 | 20 | 45 | 20 | 30 | 50 | 35 |   
                  | Re TD | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 35 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | A Battle | 160 | 10 | 0 | 20 | 10 | 0 |  | 25 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 20 | 10 | 25 | 0 |   
                  | Re TD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 16 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |  | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | V Davis | 695 | 70 | 35 | 55 | 40 | 55 |  | 85 | 50 | 30 | 20 | 45 | 45 | 25 | 45 | 55 | 40 |   
                  | Re TD | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 62 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 4 |  | 7 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 |  |  Want a darkhorse pick for fantasy player of the year? How about 
              Frank Gore? 
              The man is an absolute joy to watch, does everything a coach wants 
              his feature back to do and does it all on a team that has been largely 
              unsuccessful in surrounding him with top-notch offensive talent. 
              Furthermore, his fantasy stock has suffered a bit as each of the 
              last two offensive coordinators did not make him as much of a focal 
              point of the offense as they probably should have. If the fifth-year 
              back does have a knock against him, it is probably that he has played 
              in all 16 games in a season just once, which coincidentally came 
              during his 372-touch, 2,180-total-yard campaign under then-OC Norv 
              Turner in 2006. Now I'll be the first to say I'm not the biggest 
              fan of new OC Jimmy Raye, but it is pretty clear Gore will be his 
              workhorse - it should also be noted the Niners are already familiar 
              with this system. (Gore has gone on record suggesting Raye's offense 
              is just like Turner's.) Moreover, Gore is reportedly in the best 
              shape of his pro career and happy to have FB Moran 
              Norris - who blocked for him in 2006 - back in the lineup. Combining 
              his newfound happiness and conditioning with the Niners' plan to 
              implement more zone-blocking schemes up front - something that should 
              only further complement Gore's incredible vision and instincts - 
              and before all said and done, Gore could easily outperform his early 
              second-round ADP. By now, I hope each of you realize I wouldn't 
              base my projections solely on a player's happiness in training camp, 
              so we go to the schedule, which only further my enthusiasm as it 
              relates to San Francisco’s centerpiece. Only the Bears in Week 10 
              strike me as a defense - when healthy - that may be able to keep 
              the 26-year-old back in check all game long. Tennessee and Green 
              Bay may also have limited success against him as well, but Gore 
              really could not have asked for a better schedule to play against. 
              Assuming Minnesota's Pat and Kevin Williams end up getting suspended 
              for the first four games as many still expect them to for their 
              association with StarCaps, the Niners' running game avoids a potential 
              early-season pitfall, meaning Gore should get off to a blistering 
              start with four green matchups. The post-bye slate isn't quite as 
              easy, but for a team that will be a stubborn running team, the ex-Hurricane 
              should routinely see at least 22 touches/game. Fast forward to the 
              three-week fantasy playoff stretch, where Gore could easily have 
              his way in Weeks 14 and 16 against two teams I expect to struggle 
              stopping the run, Arizona and Detroit. Initially, the Eagles in 
              Week 15 appeared to be a buzzkill, but with all the unexpected change 
              happening on the defensive side of the ball in Philly, even that 
              matchup looks much less menacing than it did earlier in the summer.
 With rookie Michael Crabtree's holdout expected to last longer 
                than the recession, San Francisco's chances of becoming a dynamic 
                passing team in 2009 went from slim to none. That isn't to suggest 
                there isn't any reason to pay attention, though. We have all tired 
                of waiting on Vernon Davis to fulfill his immense potential, but 
                for the first time in his four-year career, there is actually 
                hope for him to deliver on it. Why? Because he has an OC that 
                is a veteran play caller and knows what a highly athletic TE can 
                do for an offense. As such, I expect a career year from Davis 
                across the board, despite all the red that appears on his schedule. 
                In short, defenses seem to have a much harder time keeping a talented 
                TE in check than a slightly-above average receiver because most 
                teams refuse to put their best cover player on a TE. Unfortunately, 
                I'm not as optimistic about San Francisco's WR corps. Josh Morgan 
                has all the talent in the world, but I'm not sure I want him serving 
                as my go-to WR quite yet. Crabtree could one day become that player, 
                but with each passing day of his holdout, Crabtree becomes that 
                much more unlikely to contribute in 2009. Lastly, Isaac Bruce 
                still proved he had a little bit left in the tank last season, 
                but I really don’t want to count on a WR that turns 37 during 
                the season who isn't the #1 option in a run-based offense. And, 
                as luck would have it, the schedule also suggests that it is in 
                the Niners' best interest to run all day. While I expect Arizona 
                and Minnesota to be decent vs. the pass, the trouble for San Fran's 
                passing game begins after the bye with two teams that will blitz 
                regularly this season (Houston, Indianapolis) followed by two 
                teams that have been pretty sound zone-based defenses over the 
                years. Green Bay's defensive backfield also isn't a good matchup 
                for the Niners' wideouts, which leads us to the end of the fantasy 
                season when the Niners will struggle to perform well in Seattle 
                and then face Arizona for the second time in Week 14. As I mentioned 
                above, Philadelphia may have some struggles against the run, but 
                the Eagles are much too deep and talented in their defensive backfield 
                to be carved up by an offense like San Francisco. Detroit may 
                appear to offer a nice Week 16 alternative for owners in their 
                title game, but something tells me Gore will be featured in that 
                contest. For owners looking for a San Francisco WR or TE to contribute, 
                spend a late-round pick on Davis and thank me later.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Seattle Seahawks |   
                  |  | Totals | STL | SF | CHI | IND | JAX | ARI | bye | DAL | DET | ARI | MIN | STL | SF | HOU | TB | GB |   
                  | (Run) |  | 4.6 | 4 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 4 | 4.4 |  | 4 | 4.7 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 4.6 | 4 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4 |   
                  | (Pass) |  | 7.6 | 7 | 6.8 | 6.1 | 7.2 | 6.7 |  | 6.1 | 7.9 | 6.7 | 6.6 | 7.6 | 7 | 7.2 | 7.4 | 6.8 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | M Hasselbeck | 3505 | 255 | 230 | 210 | 195 | 245 | 240 |  | 175 | 275 | 225 | 305 | 225 | 240 | 275 | 190 | 220 |   
                  | TD | 17 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |   
                  | INT | 11 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | J Jones | 1055 | 75 | 45 | 80 | 60 | 75 | 100 |  | 85 | 105 | 35 | 40 | 85 | 65 | 85 | 70 | 50 |   
                  | Ru TD | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | Re Yards | 125 | 10 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 0 |  | 10 | 5 | 0 | 20 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 20 |   
                  | Re TD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 21 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | Doug Duckett | 335 | 30 | 15 | 10 | 30 | 25 | 10 |  | 10 | 25 | 55 | 10 | 25 | 20 | 10 | 35 | 25 |   
                  | Ru TD | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                  | Re Yards | 30 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 5 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |   
                  | Re TD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | J Forsett | 175 | 15 | 25 | 0 | 20 | 15 | 10 |  | 20 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 15 | 25 | 10 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Ru TD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Re Yards | 210 | 15 | 10 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 20 |  | 5 | 25 | 30 | 15 | 20 | 10 | 30 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Re TD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 33 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 |  | 1 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | Doug Houshmandzadeh | 1070 | 70 | 80 | 65 | 55 | 70 | 75 |  | 45 | 100 | 60 | 105 | 70 | 55 | 85 | 60 | 75 |   
                  | Re TD | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                  | Rec | 87 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |  | 4 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 5 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | D Branch | 395 | 30 | 10 | 25 | 30 | 0 | 20 |  | 35 | 45 | 20 | 30 | 25 | 55 | 40 | 0 | 30 |   
                  | Re TD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 28 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |  | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | N Burleson | 525 | 40 | 25 | 30 | 45 | 35 | 50 |  | 20 | 55 | 70 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 50 | 30 |   
                  | Re TD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 45 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 5 |  | 2 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | D Butler | 365 | 25 | 40 | 15 | 0 | 55 | 20 |  | 10 | 25 | 0 | 30 | 50 | 30 | 15 | 40 | 10 |   
                  | Re TD | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 33 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 |  | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | J Carlson | 785 | 65 | 45 | 50 | 50 | 75 | 55 |  | 45 | 20 | 35 | 60 | 55 | 75 | 65 | 40 | 50 |   
                  | Re TD | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 63 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 4 |  | 5 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 4 |  |  If there is an offense that is walking on more pins and needles 
              than the Seahawks this season, I'm not sure who it is. Matt Hasselbeck's 
              back issues appear to be resolved, but anyone who knows anything 
              about back pain knows that bulging disks can resurface at any point. 
              Similarly, LT Walter Jones' microfracture surgery in December delayed 
              his return to the field until August 13. He'll need to quickly build 
              chemistry with likely new LG Rob Sims, who is slotted to fill in 
              there after Mike Wahle's surprising retirement announcement. C Chris 
              Spencer is back healthy after recovering from a season-ending herniated 
              disk injury and is in much the same boat as Hasselbeck in terms 
              of reliability. RG appears to be a two-man battle between Mansfield 
              Wrotto and second-round rookie Max Unger. That is, unless the team 
              decides to move Ray Willis, who is competing for the right tackle 
              position with Sean Locklear, inside to guard. Last but not least, 
              it seems as though the entire WR corps is coming back from injury, 
              except free agent pickup T.J. Houshmandzadeh. For those that weren't 
              counting, that is seven of the 11 offensive positions that are up 
              in the air, due mostly to injury concerns. And worse, given the 
              lack of depth at QB and on the offensive line, this offense could 
              be sunk if any one player goes down for an extended amount of time. 
              For now, however, we will have to assume each player is ready to 
              give Seattle a full year and avoid the same rash of injuries that 
              struck the team in 2008. Houshmandzadeh and TE John Carlson are 
              the clear go-to guys in the passing game and are the only receivers 
              worth the attention of most fantasy owners this summer because new 
              OC Greg Knapp has a long and distinguished history of getting a 
              lot of his ground game. Nate Burleson, Deion Branch and rookie Deon 
              Butler could all chip in from time to time, but this offense will 
              be mostly about Housh and Carlson converting third downs. Judging 
              by the schedule, only Chicago, Indianapolis and Dallas appear to 
              be somewhat formidable against the pass, with the last of that trio 
              meeting Seattle in Week 8. Certainly, Arizona, Minnesota and Green 
              Bay could have all been thrown into that mix as well, but when healthy, 
              Seattle still has enough talent to overcome that trio of borderline 
              pass defenses. The point is that the Seahawks may be able to enjoy 
              unexpected production from the passing game throughout the entire 
              second half of the season, making Houshmandzadeh a decent fantasy 
              WR2 option and Carlson a highly underrated TE1.
 Since I covered the offensive line issues in the paragraph above, 
                I'll move right into the RB situation. Surprisingly, former HC 
                Mike Holmgren's offense was pretty balanced a season ago (53-47 
                pass-to-run ratio). With Knapp now in charge, that ratio may very 
                well get reversed, especially if the defense can play up to its 
                potential. Much as he wants no dominant receiver in the passing 
                game, Knapp does not necessarily want to see one back get the 
                overwhelming majority of work on the ground either, which will 
                probably change my previous prediction of Julius Jones receiving 
                60% of the carries, T.J. Duckett 30% and Justin Forsett 10%. Since 
                Duckett appears to be the clear goal-line back, I'm now hard-pressed 
                to forecast Jones being the most valuable fantasy RB on his own 
                team. If I had to bet, I would say he would be, but even if the 
                split goes down to something like 50-35-15, Jones ends up losing 
                50 carries over the course of the season if the team runs 500 
                times in 2009, shedding nearly 200 yards from his projected total. 
                And it's a shame if it comes to that because the Seahawks' new 
                zone-blocking scheme should complement Jones' skill set well. 
                Just like a couple of their division rivals' schedules, the Seahawks' 
                slate is one that should allow them to have some success on the 
                ground. Outside of Minnesota in Week 11, no elite run-stopping 
                units appear on the schedule, although Chicago and Dallas have 
                the team speed and personnel necessary to be stingy vs. the run. 
                Tampa Bay and Green Bay may also have things figured out against 
                the run by the time the fantasy playoffs roll around, but the 
                real reasons to be extremely patient in drafting Seattle RBs this 
                year are: 1) the three-back system they will be using and 2) the 
                unsure nature of the offensive line. While Knapp's track record 
                for getting results from the running game is well-known around 
                the league, Seattle is walking on an extremely thin tightrope 
                hoping that the offensive line stays healthy. As a result, I would 
                consider Jones as a low-end fantasy RB3 capable of a 1,000-yard 
                season and Duckett as a mid-level RB4 capable of a 10-TD season. |