Whether you are still basking in the success you enjoyed in cruising
to your fantasy league's title, still smarting over your teams'
inability to close the deal or not quite ready to hang up your owner's
hat quite yet, playoff fantasy football may be just the thing you
need to end this season right.
I'll be the first to admit that playoff fantasy football doesn't
appeal to me quite as much as the usual 16-week marathon, but that
doesn't mean I don't still enjoy it. And coming off yet another
profitable fantasy season, I'm looking to make a great season even
better. In addition to owning one NFL.com team, I will be taking
part in several money leagues with Fuzzy's Fantasy Football. My
goal over the next four weeks will be to help each of you through
your decision-making process as you attempt to boost your bottom
line.
NFL.com
For a complete rundown of how players will score fantasy points
for your team, click on the “Official Rules” link on
the NFL.com entry page. However, much of the content immediately
below is included on the “How to Play” page, so what
I provide here should be more than enough to follow along easily.
The object of the game is to pick the players you think will perform
best in their playoff matchup. Select one QB, two RBs, two WRs,
one TE, one K and one D/ST. You will earn fantasy points based on
their on-field performance during their game, and if your player's
team wins, you will have the option to carry that player over to
the next round, where he will earn a bonus point modifier to his
score.
For example, if you pick Aaron Rodgers in the Wild Card round
and the Packers win, you can carry him over to the Divisional Round,
and earn two times (2x) the points he earns in his divisional round
game. If Green Bay wins again, you can carry Rodgers into the Conference
Championship round for 3x the points and, if the Packers make the
Super Bowl, you can earn 4x the points. In addition, a user can
select a player/defense in the Wild Card round even if their team
has a bye into the Divisional Round. In this case, the user would
not earn any points for the Wild Card round, but would then be eligible
to earn 2x points in the Divisional round, since the player was
on the team’s roster for two weekly scoring periods. Further
bonus point modifiers would also apply as long as that player’s
team continues to advance in the NFL Playoffs.
NFL.com Scoring System |
Offense Statistic (QB, RB, WR, TE, K) |
Fantasy Points |
Rushing or Receiving Touchdown: |
6 fantasy points |
Passing Touchdown: |
4 fantasy points |
Field Goal 0-49 yards: |
3 fantasy points |
Field Goal 50+ yards: |
5 fantasy points |
Passing, Rushing or Receiving Two-Point
Conversion: |
2 fantasy points |
Rushing or Receiving: |
1 fantasy point per 10 yards |
Passing: |
1 fantasy point per 25 yards |
Extra Point: |
1 fantasy point |
Defense/Special Teams (D/ST) |
|
Punt Returned Touchdown: |
6 fantasy points |
Kickoff Returned Touchdown: |
6 fantasy points |
Fumble Returned Touchdown: |
6 fantasy points |
Interception Returned Touchdown: |
6 fantasy points |
Allowing 0 Points: |
10 fantasy points |
Allowing 2-6 Points: |
7 fantasy points |
Allowing 7-13 Points: |
4 fantasy points |
Allowing 14-17 Points: |
1 fantasy points |
Allowing 18-21 Points: |
0 fantasy points |
Allowing 22-27 Points: |
-1 fantasy points |
Allowing 28-34 Points: |
-4 fantasy points |
Allowing 35-45 Points: |
-7 fantasy points |
Allowing 46+ Points: |
-10 fantasy points |
Team Win: |
5 fantasy points |
Interception: |
2 fantasy points |
Fumble Recovery: |
2 fantasy points |
Safety: |
2 fantasy points |
Sack: |
1 fantasy points |
|
Before we get into the picks, let’s briefly review the rules
and how we may use them to our advantage: 1) passing TDs are worth
four points, so passing yards are valued more highly here than in
the Fuzzy’s leagues I’ll discuss later; 2) all field
goals under 50 yards are worth three points, which means we are
more concerned about volume of field goals than distance –
unless we can find a kicker who regularly converts from 50+; 3)
this is a non-PPR format, which obviously favors the big-play threats;
and 4) team wins are worth five points, so picking a “winning”
defense is worth almost a touchdown and could be worth as much as
3.5 TDs if you pick a defense from this week and that team ends
up winning the Super Bowl.
Given the bonus point modifier mentioned above, I could understand
an owner making the decision to pass on selecting a defense this
week and electing to get twice as many points from a potentially
great defense such as the Seahawks or Panthers in the Divisional
Round. (I’m not saying I would do that, but it is a strategy
to consider.)
I’ll say this once and only once so I don’t have to
repeat myself. This week, it is advantageous to do choose players
who (in order): 1) we think will play four games and/or 2) will
likely be in the Super Bowl, even if they don’t have the best
matchups this week or on a bye. This game has a lot to do with playing
the multipliers, picking the bracket correctly and anticipating
what players will do in the Super Bowl if they get there. So before
we get to the players, I think it makes sense to break down how
I believe the playoffs will play out first.
AFC - Wildcard: Chiefs over Colts,
Bengals over Chargers
NFC - Wildcard: Eagles over Saints,
Niners over Packers
AFC - Divisional: Broncos over
Chiefs, Patriots over Bengals
NFC - Divisional: Niners over Seahawks,
Panthers over Eagles
AFC – Conference Championship:
Broncos over Patriots
NFC - Conference Championship: Niners
over Panthers
Super Bowl: Niners vs. Broncos
One other nugget: at RB and WR, I won’t evaluate every
option for obvious reasons. I’ll simply reveal my final
few choices and take it from there. Now let’s get to my
picks and my rationale for each position:
Quarterbacks
Nick Foles/Aaron Rodgers/Colin Kaepernick/Drew Brees/Andy Dalton/Andrew
Luck/Alex Smith/Philip Rivers
On bye: Peyton Manning/Tom
Brady/Russell Wilson/Cam Newton
As my predictions above suggest, I would not put much faith in
Smith, Luck, Rivers, Brees or Rodgers. Of that bunch, I think
Rivers has the best chance of playing at least two games. And
of the wildcard weekend contests, I have the least faith in my
Chiefs-Colts game prediction. So with that information out of
the way, here’s why I don’t like the aforementioned
quarterbacks in this competition. Luck and Rodgers are very good
quarterbacks covering up for porous defenses; a team can only
get by so long in the postseason with that combination. Smith
is a bit more than the caretaker he is made out to be, but he
doesn’t possess the kind of upside of some of the other
players that will receive more consideration below. Dalton and
the Bengals have been amazing at home, but Cincinnati won’t
have the luxury of playing all of its games in Paul Brown Stadium.
If the Chargers were playing either the Chiefs or Colts, I would
push them through and give Rivers more consideration. I’m
not even going to pretend to understand why the Saints are such
a different team at home than on the road. Either way, the Eagles
represent one of the worst opponents they could have drawn in
the opening round because they run the ball so well, so Brees
is eliminated. Without Rob Gronkowski around, it’s hard
to have much faith in Brady ending up as the best fantasy quarterback
in this playoff run. If history suggested that both top
seeds were going to make it through, I would be tempted to carry
Wilson into the next round because I have that much respect for
him. However, possible matchups against the Niners and
Panthers make it extremely unlikely he will be a great option.
Furthermore, I doubt this is the rare year that both top seeds
will meet in the Super Bowl.
As a result, the following options remain: Foles, Kaepernick,
Manning and Newton. Perhaps if I felt stronger about my Eagles-Panthers
prediction in the divisional round, I would consider either Foles
or Newton as my top option (particularly Foles since he and Kaepernick
are the only quarterbacks remaining that I think can potentially
give me four “full” games of production. Ultimately,
I think Carolina and Philadelphia’s secondaries are flawed
and that will end up getting each one knocked out before the Super
Bowl. As a result, we are left with the quarterbacks I believe
will make the Super Bowl in Kaepernick and Manning.
The call: Peyton Manning. It would
seem that Kaepernick is a no-brainer choice here because he will
play four games according to my predictions, but the potential
of shredding the weaker defenses of Green Bay (this week) and
Denver (potentially in the Super Bowl) does not erase the likelihood
of a couple of duds against possible matchups in Seattle and Carolina.
I’d much rather take the chance that Manning will have his
way against Cincinnati’s beat-up secondary, New England’s
injury-ravaged defense and either San Francisco or Seattle on
a neutral field.
Running Backs
McCoy's best game in the playoffs might
be his first.
LeSean McCoy/Eddie Lacy/Frank Gore/Pierre Thomas/Darren Sproles/Giovani
Bernard/BenJarvus Green-Ellis/Trent Richardson/Donald Brown/Jamaal
Charles/Ryan Mathews/Danny Woodhead
On bye: Knowshon Moreno/Montee
Ball/Stevan Ridley/Shane Vereen/LeGarrette Blount/ Marshawn Lynch/DeAngelo
Williams
The first wave of cuts will include Lacy, Thomas, Sproles, Bernard,
Green-Ellis, Richardson, Brown, Mathews, Woodhead, Ball, Ridley,
Vereen, Blount and Williams. Ultimately, none of the cuts were
hard to make either due to the fact this is a standard-scoring
format, the likelihood any of them will play more than two games
or both. I’m going to table McCoy for now because I can
definitely see a scenario in which the league’s leading
rusher plays three games, which means he could he more valuable
with his 1x, 2x and 3x multipliers than someone like Gore who
could get to 4x.
I’ll cut the cord on Charles at this point simply because
I think we’ve seen that while Kansas City is close to Denver,
it cannot quite go punch for punch with the Broncos’ offense.
As a result, I’m not willing to buy the Chiefs playing more
than two games.) Gore is an obvious candidate given that I think
he could play four games, but I’m going out on enough of
a limb predicting a Niners win in Seattle that I’d just
as soon avoid using any San Francisco players in this competition
if it at all possible. Lynch makes a ton of sense as someone who
could reward me with 2x, 3x and 4x multipliers because of his
ability to produce against just about any defense. Moreno also
is a very good choice since the reason Denver wanted to sprinkle
in Ball during the second half of the season was so it could ride
the five-year veteran harder in the playoffs. In the end, I think
a divisional round game between the Niners and Seahawks is a toss-up,
meaning I’d just as soon avoid both Lynch and Gore until
the conference championship.
The call: Knowshon Moreno and LeSean McCoy. I doubt this will be the last time I’ll mention how
flawed each team in this playoff field is this season. The Broncos
are arguably a less well-rounded team than they were last season,
yet I don’t see a team on the AFC side that can make a strong
case to win in Denver (again, in some cases) as they are currently
constructed. With that said, I’ll opt for the potential
2x, 3x and 4x opportunities I should get from Moreno as the Broncos
attempt to balance their offense as much as possible in the cold-weather
games they will likely play the rest of the season. As for McCoy,
I expect him to rip apart the Saints. Ideally, I could load up
on 3x and 4x players this week and not look back, but I like the
idea of getting a huge first week out of McCoy and riding him
out until the Eagles lose while I see what happens with the Niners
and Seahawks. I’m comfortable that likely matchups of the
Niners and Panthers (for Lynch) and Seahawks and Panthers (for
Gore) aren’t going to yield a ton of fantasy points for
either player, so why not ride McCoy until I see how the first
two weeks shake out? In the event the Eagles can get through to
the conference championship, I’ll take McCoy’s 3x
against any defense and shift over to the NFC representative in
the Super Bowl if/when the Eagles lose.
Wide Receivers
DeSean Jackson/Riley Cooper/Randall Cobb/James Jones/Jordy Nelson/Jarrett
Boykin/Michael Crabtree/Anquan Boldin/Marques Colston/Kenny Stills/A.J.
Green/Marvin Jones/TY Hilton/Da’Rick Rogers/LaVon Brazill/Griff
Whalen/Dwayne Bowe/Donnie Avery/Dexter McCluster/Keenan Allen/Eddie
Royal
On bye: Demaryius Thomas/Eric
Decker/Wes Welker/Julian Edelman/Danny Amendola/Aaron Dobson/Kenbrell
Thompkins/Percy Harvin/Golden Tate/Doug Baldwin/Steve Smith/Brandon
LaFell/Ted Ginn
Rather than listing each player by name, I will not consider
any of the receivers playing this week for various reasons. With
the Eagles’ receivers, it is all about likely future matchups.
As far as the wideouts of the Packers, Saints, Bengals, Colts,
Chiefs and Chargers are concerned, I don’t like their chances
of playing more than two games. The Niners’ pass-catchers
are the hardest to cut, but I find it difficult to predict which
one will enjoy a better three- or four-game run (and it isn’t
as if the Niners’ passing attack is so dynamic that it will
overcome the likes of Seattle and Carolina anyway).
Of the remaining players, only Denver has an elite-level passing
game with good/great receivers and a quarterback that can keep
most (if not all) of them involved enough to make them worth using
each week. Edelman would obviously be a much stronger option in
PPR scoring while Welker’s recent run with concussions is
more risk than I’d like to assume. Although Harvin is likely
going to be on the field this postseason, I can’t buy him
or any of the Seattle receivers until the Super Bowl, if even
then. I can pretty much say the same thing about the Panthers’
pass-catchers, as only TE Greg Olsen appears to be a viable fantasy
option now.
The call: Demaryius Thomas and Eric Decker. Obviously, this contest is a fantasy-based game,
so it only makes sense to go with the combination of players that:
a) are capable of posting huge stat lines any given week; b) play
in dynamic passing attacks and c) have the ability to make it
to the Super Bowl. As you can tell, there aren’t too many
receivers available that satisfy all of those requirements. If
the regular season is any indication, Manning will pepper a different
receiver each week with the most targets. Thomas has been pretty
consistent since Manning arrived and is generally able to enjoy
a double-digit fantasy performance every week – even with
a small yardage total – because he finds the end zone so
often. Decker obviously runs a little bit more hot-and-cold than
Thomas, but his “blowup” potential in any given week
is pretty tempting in a multiplier format. Rather than trying
to predict which player between Decker and Thomas will be the
man each week, I can reduce my risk by using both and hope both
receivers can reward me with at least one 2-3 touchdown day over
their three-game postseason run.
Tight Ends
Brent Celek/Zach Ertz/Andrew Quarless/Vernon Davis/Jimmy Graham/Jermaine
Gresham /Tyler Eifert/Coby Fleener/Anthony Fasano/Antonio Gates
On bye: Julius Thomas/ Jacob
Tamme/ Michael Hoomanawanui/Zach Miller/Greg Olsen
The first round of cuts this time includes every one of the tight
ends playing this week (except Davis and Graham), Tamme, Hoomanawanui
and Miller. With elite tight ends available, it doesn’t
make a lot of sense to roll the dice on any of the others. I could
get into more detail, but it really boils down to that in the
end.
Very quickly, we have trimmed the pool of realistic options down
to Graham, Davis and Thomas. As fantasy’s best tight end,
Graham has to be given consideration simply because he could easily
explode for 100 yards and two touchdowns against any opponent.
However, his likely one-and-out postseason trip doesn’t
make it tempting enough to lock him in here. Davis’ appeal
is pretty obvious when one takes a look at his recent postseason
history: 22 catches, 546 yards and five touchdowns in five games.
Fantasy consistency has eluded him with Kaepernick as his quarterback
for the most part, but he is on a stretch where he has caught
scoring passes in six of his last seven games (including five
in a row at one point). Thomas is probably the best three-game
bet of the bunch simply because he appears to be the player Manning
trusts the most in the red zone, which speaks volumes.
The call: Vernon Davis. For an
elite tight end, Thomas’ yardage numbers have been relatively
pedestrian since about Week 6. Thomas also cannot play more than
three games and isn’t helped in this format by his relatively
high reception total. Davis offers more big-play ability, the
potential for more games and more in the way of postseason production.
It’s probably the most difficult call I’ll make this
week because I could easily be convinced to roll with Thomas,
but I’ll opt for some balance here with Davis.
Kickers
Alex Henery/Mason Crosby/Phil Dawson/Shayne Graham/Mike Nugent/Adam
Vinatieri/Ryan Succop/Nick Novak
On bye: Matt Prater/Stephen
Gostkowski/Steven Hauschka/Graham Gano
Kickers and defense/special teams units require slightly different
thinking, although the goal is still the same – find the
player/unit that will play the most games and live with peaks
and valleys that come along with those positions. As a result,
I’m letting Henery, Crosby, Graham, Nugent, Vinatieri, Succop,
Novak, Gostkowski and Gano sit.
This leaves us with Hauschka, Dawson and Prater. This format
does not differentiate between kick distances as much as Fuzzy’s
below, but Prater’s 50-yard field goals in the thin air
of Colorado could give him a slight edge here. Hauschka and Prater
can play a maximum of three games while Dawson can play four.
Prater is also more likely to be kicking extra points since his
offense is so proficient and Denver’s declining defense
may force the Broncos to go for touchdowns more often than field
goals. On the other hand, Hauschka and Dawson are more likely
to kick chip-shot field goals since their coaches believe in their
defenses’ ability to shut down the opponent.
The call: Matt Prater. Up until
about Week 16, I was convinced that I my NFL.com playoff team
would be loaded with Broncos and Seahawks…let’s hope
my eyes haven’t deceived me the last two weeks. Staying
true to my word above about trying to avoid as many Niners as
possible for the first week or two, I’m going to roll with
Prater since I believe the Broncos have the best shot of all the
teams to end up in the Super Bowl. I had Dawson in my lineup right
up until I submitted this story, but I chose Prater in the end
because my belief in the Broncos is stronger than the Niners.
Defense/Special Teams
Eagles/Packers/Niners/Saints/Bengals/Colts/Chiefs/Chargers
On bye: Patriots/Broncos/Seahawks/Panthers
Let’s cut to the chase: I have no faith in the Packers’
defense, the Saints’ ability to defend any opponent on the
road or the Colts’ defense in general. I also believe the
better NFC teams will eventually expose Philadelphia’s secondary
and that Cincinnati’s weakened back four will also lead
to its demise. San Diego played much better defense down the stretch
than it did to start the season, but the Bengals’ ability
to score points at home scares me away from the Chargers’
defense. The Broncos and Patriots have both been hit hard by injuries,
making them poor picks as well.
Thus, we are left with the Niners, Chiefs, Seahawks and Panthers.
In the event Kansas City gets by Indianapolis this week (which
is no lock), it will likely face Denver again – a recipe
for disaster as far as fantasy defenses are concerned. Choosing
between San Francisco, Seattle and Carolina for defenses is no
easy chore and a strong argument could be made for any of them.
The call: Niners.
It appears I’m going pretty much all in on Denver with a
hint of San Francisco after all. Once again, my stance is locking
up the potential 4x option now and hoping for the best. Assuming
the Niners get past the Packers as I predict they will, they could
be in line for a couple of defense-dominated battles with Seattle
and Carolina. Defense is unpredictable enough that I’m not
going to be too upset if I have to switch to Seattle in two weeks
because it is entirely possible the net result of my choice will
cost me 5-10 points at the most.
Fearless predictions for my selected team:
Manning: bye
Moreno: bye
McCoy: 140 rushing yards, two rushing TDs, 25 receiving yards
(28 fantasy points)
Thomas: bye
Decker: bye
Davis: 75 receiving yards, one receiving TD (13 points)
Prater: bye
Niners DST: 24 PA, three sacks, two turnovers and a team win (12
points)
Projected Total: 53 fantasy points
Fuzzy’s
Many of the scoring parameters used above apply here as well,
with the key differences being that Fuzzy’s uses PPR scoring
and there are no bonus-point modifiers or team-win points. Kickers
get four points for field goals between 40-49 yards and six points
for 60+ conversions while all TDs are worth six points. Your goal
is to pick the highest-scoring lineup each week with no strings
attached. Additionally, each owner is asked to select a tiebreaker
every week which will be used to break any ties following the
Super Bowl. Fuzzy's leagues contain no more than 50 teams in a
league whereas most other major sites employ a one-man-against-the-world
approach. As a result, 20% of the entrants into Fuzzy's playoff
leagues will - at the very least - recoup their entry fee, with
first through ninth place receiving a nice return on investment
for their troubles. Follow this link for a complete list of the
rules.
Position Requirements: 1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, 1 K, 1
Defense/Special Teams
Since I will be playing with several teams with Fuzzy’s
this season, I’ll simply list my teams below and present
a brief overview on my overall thought process. (There is a chance
I’ll add a fifth team, so don’t be surprised to see
an additional column below next week.) Depending on how strongly
I feel about matchups in a given week, I may use the same lineup
in more than one league. My best advice: do not try to “make
your move” in Week 1. The time to separate from the pack
is later in the competition, not now.
Fuzzy Portfolio |
|
Team 1 |
Team 2 |
Team 3 |
Team 4 |
QB |
Foles |
Kaepernick |
Foles |
Kaepernick |
RB |
Charles |
Charles |
Charles |
Charles |
RB |
McCoy |
McCoy |
McCoy |
McCoy |
WR |
Green |
Green |
Green |
Green |
WR |
Nelson |
Nelson |
Nelson |
Nelson |
WR |
Colston |
Allen |
Allen |
Colston |
TE |
Graham |
Graham |
Davis |
Davis |
K |
Dawson |
Henery |
Vinatieri |
Dawson |
DST |
Bengals |
Bengals |
Bengals |
Bengals |
Tie |
Kaepernick |
Foles |
Kaepernick |
Foles |
|
My main goals going into the competition this season are to:
a) play the studs first, b) play the matchups second and c) not
to be so bold with my picks that I find myself in a 50-point hole
next week. All too often since winning my league in my first year
of this contest, I have valued the matchup too heavily (or put
too much weight into the regular-season head-to-head meeting)
and it has cost me. Most offensive coordinators aren’t going
to go down in the playoffs without making sure they have exhausted
every avenue in order to get their best player the ball. In short,
I’m not going to predict this is the week that McCoy gets
hurt or that Green Bay sells out to stop Colin Kaepernick.
In this week-to-week competition, I’m going to use the
Saints-Eagles game as my foundation for fantasy points this week
at a number of my positions. I don’t often consult Vegas
when it comes to my decisions, but the over/under of 53.5 is nearly
a touchdown higher than every other game this weekend and a reasonable
gauge for the kind of game I expect it to be (even if I think
the estimate is a bit conservative). Typically, I’d jump
at the chance to take Brees against the Philadelphia pass defense,
but it appears this edition of the Saints is a completely different
animal on the road than it is at home. (As a point of reference,
Brees’ highest-scoring road game was 23.5 in this scoring
system.) New Orleans’ defense isn’t exactly a sieve,
but I’d like to think that if quarterbacks like Kellen Clemens
and Mike Glennon can score 18.8 fantasy points against New Orleans
over the final quarter of the season, Foles should be able to
get into the mid-to-high 20s with more plays and better personnel.
I’m very tempted to roll with Kaepernick in at least one
league simply because Green Bay hasn’t found a way to stop
him yet and don’t seem overly likely to do it now with a
bunch of injuries, including one to Clay Matthews (thumb) that
will keep him out of this game. It wouldn’t surprise me
in the least if Rodgers is able to put up a big fantasy line (300+
yards, two touchdowns), but he’ll be hard-pressed to do
anything more against San Francisco’s defense.
Every so often, making fantasy choices can be as easy as taking
the top two scorers at the position and hoping for the best. With
apologies to Lacy (matchup), Bernard (playing time) and the two
San Diego running backs (again, playing time), it doesn’t
make a lot of sense to start anyone else besides the league’s
leading rusher and the fantasy’s best back against two less-than-scary
defenses in the Saints and Colts, respectively. I could easily
make the case that Pierre Thomas and Darren Sproles are worthy
of consideration given in this PPR format how often they are used
in the screen game (against what I believe will be a blitz-heavy
gameplan by the Eagles), but it’s going to be a tough sell
to use either one of two part-time backs over two full-time ones.
I’d also just as soon not try to predict this will be the
week where the Bengals give Bernard 20+ touches either.
As is typically the case, the owners that enjoy the most success
in the first week of the postseason will be those that make the
right calls at the three receiver spots. I’m tempted to
use Hilton, but tend to believe the Chiefs will do everything
in their power to make sure he isn’t the reason the Colts
beat them. Jackson has been a solid choice for most of the season
and would seem to be one here given the Saints’ road woes,
but he’ll likely draw emerging CB Keenan Lewis most of the
game – leaving Riley Cooper as the likely top fantasy receiver
for the Eagles. I hate to bank solely on Colston’s ability
to be a second-half-of-the-season standout, but he’s at
it once again and poses a huge size mismatch for the Eagles when
he moves into the slot. It is entirely possible Colston and Jimmy
Graham take turns dominating drives Saturday. Green scored at
least 11 points in all but one game this season and he could easily
exceed the 5-83-1 line he posted in San Diego on Dec. 1. (I suspect
Bengals-Chargers will not be another 17-10 game this time around
nor do I believe Marvin Jones will steal multiple touchdowns from
Green in a game during the postseason.)
Allen has been so good at finding the end zone that I’m
almost obligated to play him in half of my leagues. It is pretty
clear that Rodgers’ trust in Nelson wasn’t hurt by
the quarterback’s seven-game absence. Nelson has been PPR
gold in just about every game Rodgers finished this season. As
captivating as Cobb’s two-score return was last week, I’m
going to wait another week (at least, and that assumes the Packers
can beat the Niners) to see if he plays more than half of Green
Bay’s snaps.
With Matthews unable to play for Green Bay, Davis is a good bet
to run more pass patterns than usual. Combined with his recent
history against the Packers and Green Bay’s struggles against
athletic tight ends, Davis could enjoy a 100-yard, 1-3 score effort
if San Francisco really wants to exploit the matchup. As I alluded
to earlier with Colston, Graham should be set up for a good day
if the offense can find a way to cobble together a Superdome-quality
offensive performance on the road. If Brees throws for two scores
(which sounds about right given his track record away from home
in 2013), Graham is an awfully good bet to snag at least one of
them.
As is the case anytime I play fantasy football, I favor strong-legged
kicker playing in good weather (or a dome) in an offense that
either struggles in the red zone or doesn’t mind settling
for field goals because the coach has enough confidence in his
defense. Unfortunately, there is only one good weather/dome game
this weekend and I’m not all that keen on Succop (given
the Chiefs’ last game against the Colts) or Vinatieri (extremely
up-and-down fantasy scorer this season, even for a kicker). Still,
Vinatieri is about the best bet for a huge fantasy day, so I’ll
probably try to steal a few points with him in one league. For
the most part, however, I’ll go for the strong-legged kicker
on the defensive-oriented team on at least half of my teams (Dawson).
Because points are likely to be plentiful in Philly, I may wrestle
with using Henery on at least one team in hopes he can put up
four extra points and two long field goals.
I don’t have a ton of faith in any of the D/ST options
this week, but the Bengals’ defense has been pretty special
at Paul Brown Stadium for most of the season, albeit against mostly
questionable competition. And in cases such as this one, I’d
prefer the second-highest scoring available defense at home over
the top-scoring unit on the road (Chiefs) that could have a pair
of limited pass rushers against a Colts’ team that handled
it a few weeks ago.
Suggestions, comments, about the article
or fantasy football in general? E-mail
me or follow me on Twitter.
Doug Orth has written for FF Today since 2006 and appeared in
USA Today’s Fantasy Football Preview magazine in 2010 and
2011. He is also the host of USA Today’s hour-long, pre-kickoff
fantasy football internet chat every Sunday. Doug regularly appears
as a fantasy football analyst on Sirius XM’s “Fantasy
Drive” and for 106.7 The Fan (WJFK – Washington, D.C).
He is also a member of the Fantasy Sports Writers Association. |