Fantasy Football Today - fantasy football rankings, cheatsheets, and information
A Fantasy Football Community!




 Log In  | Sign Up  |  Contact      






NFL Draft Profile – QB Shedeur Sanders



By Doug Orth | 4/2/25 |


Shedeur Sanders

Vitals


College: Colorado
Height/Weight: 6’ 1 1/2’’/212
Hands: 9 3/8"
Age: 23 (at the time of the 2025 season opener)


Important NFL Combine Numbers

40-Yard Dash: N/A
Vertical Jump: N/A
Broad Jump: N/A
20-Yard Shuttle: N/A
3-Cone: N/A

College Production (Stats)

High-end NFL Player Comp(s): A more aggressive Teddy Bridgewater
Low-end NFL Player Comp(s): Tyler Huntley

Best Scheme Fit: Once he has proven he can anticipate his throws on a more regular basis, a run-heavy attack that features short (0-9 yards) and intermediate (10-19) passes.

Best Team Fit(s): Steelers, Giants, Titans, Browns

Non-bolded times - Good examples of attribute
Bolded times - Average/poor examples of attribute

Position-Specific Attributes and Grades
Attribute Att Grade Scale Examples
Accuracy 9.0 10.0

3:26, 4:14, 5:03, 6:46, 7:20

0:39, 3:34, 4:32, 9:24

Anticipation/Tight Window 7.5 10.0

0:43, 1:08, 3:25, 6:12, 7:20

0:51, 3:34, 4:32, 5:31, 9:24

Decision Making 7.5 10.0

2:40, 4:14, 5:09

0:57, 2:18, 2:28, 4:32, 5:07, 7:04, 7:49, 9:24

Durability/Toughness 9.5 10.0
Improvisation/Throw On Run 8.5 10.0

2:06, 2:35, 2:52, 4:14, 5:48

0:39, 5:07, 7:00

Poise/Awareness 8.5 10.0

0:43, 2:35, 4:14, 5:09, 6:19, 9:45

0:57, 1:36, 2:18, 2:28, 5:07, 7:04

Vision/Read Progression 7.5 10.0

0:22, 2:35, 4:14, 5:09, 6:19, 8:20

0:57, 4:32, 5:31, 9:24

Athleticism/Mobility 3.0 5.0

0:07, 1:29, 2:40, 4:14, 8:59

5:45, 6:54

Arm Strength 3.5 5.0

3:26, 4:14, 5:03, 7:20

3:34, 4:32, 7:53

Film Grade 64.5 80.0

Pre-Draft Fantasy Prospect Grade* (out of 50): 36.0

* - How well does his skill set carry over to the fantasy game? For quarterbacks, a player needs to be a realistic threat for 4,000 passing yards and 500 rushing yards to be a candidate for a perfect grade. Positional scarcity at the pro level is also a part of the equation.

Positives

  • Consistently accurate when protected (80.8 percent completion rate on passes from a clean pocket and 69.5 percent completion rate on throws 10-plus yards downfield in 2024).

  • No stranger to chaos in the pocket (which he will likely see plenty in the NFL); flashed enough pocket presence to believe it could be a strength relatively quickly in the pros.

  • Took a beating at times in college, proving he has the requisite toughness to keep his eyes downfield even when he knows he will take a hit.

  • Elevated two programs during his college career (Jackson State went 23-3 in his two years there, while Colorado won 13 games in 2023-24 after winning nine in the previous three seasons).

  • He is used to dealing with the limelight and expectations that come with expectations - the ones that come with his position as well as living up to the family name (son of Hall of Famer Deion Sanders).

Negatives

  • Not much evidence of him being able to anticipate throws, although he made some progress in this area in 2024.

  • Slightly above-average athleticism; able to move the chains with his legs but is far from a game-breaker.

  • Undisciplined with regards to his drop-back; will occasionally drift into pressure or drop back too far, making it easier for outside pressure to get home. (How much was a lack of trust in his offensive line to blame?)

  • Good but not great arm strength.

  • Repeatedly guilty of giving up ground and making poorly blocked pass plays worse.

Bottom Line

Colorado's offensive line has struggled to pass block since Sanders joined the Buffaloes after leaving Jackson State, especially against stunts (which is usually a sign of poor communication up front). However, that alone does not explain or excuse him taking an FBS-high 52 sacks in 2023 or an FBS-high 42 sacks in 2024. (Pro Football Focus credited him for being directly responsible for 26.2 percent of the pressures he faced this season - the highest mark in this draft class.) Another critique was offensive coordinator Pat Shurmur relying almost exclusively on a true spread attack. While this approach did wonders for giving Sanders easy reads (24.1 percent of his passes came at or behind the line of scrimmage in 2024) and inflated his passing efficiency numbers, it largely wasted Shurmur's 25 years of pro coaching experience on the offensive side of the ball. While he is not a statute by any means, Sanders tries to extend plays too often and does not possess the athleticism to escape defenders if he tries to buy too much time.

With that said, he took a step forward in 2024 in terms of throwing on time. More development in this area will be critical to his ability to serve as a starting quarterback in the league because he is not a good enough athlete to be a see-it-and-throw-it passer in the NFL. Until anticipation becomes more of a strength, it would be a mistake for his next team to rely on him as anything more than a caretaker. On the plus side, Sanders does two things as well as any quarterback in this draft class: he is highly accurate and he gives his receiver run- after-catch opportunities. He also possesses the necessary toughness and accuracy - especially in the short and intermediate areas of the field - to give himself a chance at long-term success in the pros. Whereas draft classmate Cam Ward has a higher ceiling and a lower floor, Sanders is probably the safer selection of the two in that there is a decent chance he will be a solid but unspectacular pro quarterback.


Predict the top ten picks of the NFL Draft for a chance to win $100 and FFToday prizes. Enter our NFL Draft Contest now.


Doug Orth has written for FFToday since 2006 and joined the Fantasy Points website before the start of the 2024 season. He is also a highly successful high-stakes player who often appears as a guest analyst on Sirius XM. Doug is also a member of the Fantasy Sports Writers Association. Please check out his new podcast with JJ Wenner called "The All-Out Blitz."




NFL Draft Contest