Court Is Now In Session
8/15/08
Welcome to the Commissioner’s Court, Judge Mark A. Shutters
presiding. In this weekly forum I’ll be issuing verdicts on
petitions from commissioners as well as team owners, covering any
fantasy football rules related topics throughout the season. From
lineups to scoring, and yes even the dreaded “is-this-trade-collusion”
questions, we’ll answer them all right here – in the
Commissioner’s Court.
First, a bit about myself: I’ve been a fantasy football
player and commissioner for over 15 years. My first experience
with the game came when three of my college buddies and I found
a brochure for fantasy football stuck inside a recently purchased
case of Bud Light. We thought it would be entertaining so we gave
it a try. I took the responsibility for compiling the stats and
running the league. I still remember our first rules dispute when
two teams wanted to acquire Miami Dolphins RB, Sammy Smith and
we had no priority system for claims. The solution, draw numbers
from a hat each week for claim priority if there were conflicting
claims. Yes, it was a highly advanced system back then.
Since then I’ve played and run various leagues with many
formats, scoring systems and rules quirks. Currently, I run a
14-team single-keeper league, I’m in my third season of
a 12-team dynasty league and I’ll participate in a 12-team
redraft league this season for FFToday. One of the reasons
I’ve wanted to do a commissioner’s column is that
so much information and advice are available to the fantasy football
player, but there are fewer resources for the commissioner. I’m
looking forward using this column to impart my experiences with
the game to assist others. In the process I hope to learn new
gaming twists and formats to keep my league interesting and challenging.
So feel free to submit
your questions. If you have questions regarding your rules
or scoring, it would be best to submit the exact text of the rule
in question, not just your synopsis of it. For questions regarding
players, please submit all players involved on each team involved.
For general league setup advice, it will be helpful to know the
experience level of your league’s owners and if the league
is highly competitive and involves money or is more for fun. As
stated before, I’ll review some questions regarding trade
fairness, but I don’t want this to turn into a forum just
for analyzing trades. I know you guys do enough of that on the
message boards anyway.
To start the ball rolling, I’ll address a couple of questions
I’ve been asked recently regarding the trade approval process
and waiver priorities.
Q) My league currently uses the worst record
to prioritize waiver claims and we don’t want to use a bidding
system. Are there any other options?
A) I’ve never been a fan of the worst picks first for claiming
players. One, it rewards mediocrity. Two, it doesn’t necessarily
do what it’s supposed to do. Many key free agents are acquired
early in the season. In those early weeks, teams with bad records
aren’t always the worst teams. Aside from the bid system
I’ve seen a system that simply assigns waiver position by
inverting the draft order and then resetting that order as claims
are made (i.e. you go to the back of the line after claiming a
player). It’s not a perfect solution, but to me it’s
no worse than the worst picks first option.
Q) I’m running a league that currently
uses a league majority vote to approve/reject trades. I feel the
owners misuse the veto power to prevent trades that help their
competitors. I want to change this to commissioner approval, but
the league members are against this. Are there any compromises?
A) As you are experiencing, there are drawbacks to both systems.
League veto gives owners a chance to veto legitimate trades on
the basis that it will hurt their chances to win, which isn’t
a valid reason. Commissioner veto puts a lot of power in the hands
of one person. Personally I prefer the commissioner veto because
a good commissioner is going to do what’s best for the league,
not what’s good for an individual team. However, I’ve
seen leagues that do have a trade committee. This is a group of
usually 3 owners who rule on trades. It gives league members the
assurance that the commissioner doesn’t have absolute power
but keeps most owners from getting involved in trade approvals.
If you go this route the committee should be made up of experienced
and respected owners. You’ll also need backups in the event
that trades involve members of the committee.
This question raises another question. How should league rule
changes be handled? I’ll rule on that issue next week but
if your league has rules on how rules changes are handled please
submit those or any questions
you may have for next week’s Commissioner’s Court.
|