2/1/08
One of the best tools that FF Today provides is the fantasy
football points vs. feature and, more specifically, the remaining
Strength of Schedule.
Using this feature, it is my hope to augment these features and
refine them even further. Over time, it should be proven in this
column that different styles of players score differently against
different opponents. For example, perhaps a possession receiver
makes for a better play against a certain defense as opposed to
a burner despite the fact that the defensive back guarding him is
considered slow. Given the high number of committee running backs
and teams without a clear-cut #1 receiver in the NFL, I feel this
analysis will help owners with roster decisions throughout this
season.
QBs: (1 pt per 25 yds passing;
6 pts for all TDs, -2 pts/INT or fumble)
RBs/WRs/TEs: (1 point per 10
yards rushing/receiving, 6 points per TD)
Note: Teams that have a fantasy
relevant TE will be included.
Eli Manning/Plaxico Burress/Amani Toomer/Steve
Smith/Kevin Boss
Brandon Jacobs/Ahmad Bradshaw (vs. NE)
Similar passing attacks that have faced the Patriots this season:
Giants
Similar rushing attacks that have faced the Patriots this season:
Giants
FF Points Allowed vs. similar QBs: 29.9
FF Points Allowed vs. similar WRs: 27.7
FF Points Allowed vs. similar TEs: 11.0
FF Points Allowed vs. similar RBs: 17.0
FF Points Allowed vs. QBs/WRs/TEs during playoffs: 12.1/21.1/7.7
FF Points Allowed vs. RBs during playoffs: 10.5
Passing
Game Thoughts: In its purest form, football is generally
won by the team that makes fewer mental and physical mistakes.
And quite honestly, no team has done that better than the Giants
this postseason. Whether they can take the same caretaker approach
against the last team that defeated them is another story. What
has clearly been shown so far is that the Giants defense has improved
to the point that if the offense can score 20 or more points,
the defense will take care of the rest. Now, what remains to be
seen is whether New York took a large step up as a team in Week
17 or if the Patriots played about as poorly on defense as they
could in that game. Much like their first two playoff opponents,
the Patriots will see if the Giants can beat them through the
air, which leads us to the combination of Manning to Burress.
Manning, who has been ripped by the media for his inconsistency
throughout his career, has been nearly dead-on in the playoffs.
His completion percentage has improved from 56.3% to 62.3% and
he has yet to throw an INT after throwing 20 in the regular season.
Now the former stat may not sound like much, but that figures
into roughly 2-3 more catches per game, plays that give New York
important first downs to keep drives alive or that can lead to
broken tackles in the open field for big plays.
Burress has already been quoted saying a few things this week,
including his ankle being at “97 percent”. If that
is the case, he is a mismatch for any CB in the New England secondary.
CB Asante Samuel, who will not follow Burress all over the field
(but will likely cover him the majority of the time), is not likely
to have as much impact in this game against Burress as he has
in past playoff games (against the Colts, for example) because
so much of what Burress catches is high and deep, not quick-breaking
routes like Samuel has made a living on in the past. And judging
by Burress’ two-TD performance in their last meeting, Samuel
may need some safety help. CB Ellis Hobbs should do a fair job
against Toomer, although Manning has shown no reluctance to go
his way when the situation warrants. However, it would not be
a shock to see Toomer be the beneficiary of single coverage on
a few deep outs as New England concentrates its resources on slowing
Burress. Stopping the TE has been a sore spot in two postseason
games for the Pats, therefore, Boss may be a sneaky play. With
all that said, the Giants need two of three key areas to be in
their favor to pull the upset (and probably in this order). (1)
The ground game will need to be ultra-productive; (2); Burress
to be as healthy as he says he is and unstoppable as he can be;
(3) Manning must continue to be efficient and be his “playoff
self” and not the QB so many New York fans grew to dislike.
I’m not sure if I trust what I see yet from Manning, but
this incredible run of his started against the Patriots and as
much as the detractors will say New England did not bring their
“A-game”, any fan knows that the Pats wanted that
game to complete their perfect season. So while I would still
prefer Tom Brady be my QB in this game, I tend to believe we are
starting to see the evolution of Eli Manning.
Running Game Thoughts: As stated
above, the ground game will play a vital role in determining whether
the Giants win, stay close or get blown out. While Manning deserves
a lot of the credit for evolving during the playoffs, it has been
made easier by the big-play ability and spark Bradshaw has brought
to the offense. It’s unthinkable watching him now that he
wasn’t allowed to make an impact on this offense until Week
16! It is safe to say that he is as trusted with the ball at this
point as Jacobs is, so it is hard to decipher which RB will see
the most work. However, Jacobs remains the best fantasy play by
a slim margin because of his nose for the end zone (four TDs during
the playoffs to Bradshaw’s zero). I do like New England’s
chances to limit the Giants on the ground in this game, seeing
as how they have kept the Jags and Chargers in check in the last
two contests. But much like teams have done with the Colts in
years past and the Buffalo Bills in the early 90s, it is important
to run effectively, chew up the clock as much they can and leave
the Patriots’ offense in the worst field position possible.
Granted, New England has driven the length of the field to score
better than any team this season, but if New York is continually
forcing the Pats to go the distance (much as they have done to
their opponents in the first three playoff games), the Giants
can win this game. Obviously, it will help if the combination
of Jacobs and Bradshaw can combine for 150 total yards, but turnovers
and field position will likely have a better say in what team
prevails.
Projections:
Eli Manning: 230 pass/3 TD/2 INT
Plaxico Burress: 75 rec/1 TD
Amani Toomer: 80 rec/1 TD
Steve Smith: 30 rec
Kevin Boss: 20 rec/1 TD
Brandon Jacobs: 50 rush/1 TD/15 rec
Ahmad Bradshaw: 60 rush/10 rec
Tom Brady/Randy Moss/Wes Welker/Donte
Stallworth/Jabar Gaffney/Ben Watson
Laurence Maroney/Kevin Faulk (vs. NYG)
Similar passing attacks that have faced the Giants this season:
Patriots
Similar rushing attacks that have faced the Giants this season:
Patriots
FF Points Allowed vs. similar QBs: 25.4
FF Points Allowed vs. similar WRs: 37.4
FF Points Allowed vs. similar TEs: 3.8
FF Points Allowed vs. similar RBs: 23.2
FF Points Allowed vs. QBs/WRs/TEs during playoffs: 19.8/20.4/11.5
FF Points Allowed vs. RBs during playoffs: 8.5
Passing Game Thoughts: I don’t
think there is any doubt that the Giants have to play a “more
perfect” game than the Patriots do this weekend. However,
I will say that if New York can continue generating the pressure
it has put on opposing QBs during the postseason, this contest
can be every bit as interesting as the first meeting was between
these teams. One nugget I have learned about football over the
years is the power of deception – in this case, the power
a defense can gain by feigning an all-out blitz but then sending
only 4-5 rushers. In essence, the more often a defense can make
an offensive line block air, the better. In the playoffs, the
Giants have done a fantastic job of bringing no more than five
rushers to generate pressure while getting better-than-expected
play from their back seven in coverage. They will need to incorporate
all the principles of zone and overload blitzes that DC Steve
Spanuolo has used over the course of the season. But the biggest
thing they need is for their safeties to think pass first and
work from the back to the front. In other words, stop Moss at
all costs and take good angles on the ball carrier. The safety
play (bad angles, etc) on Donald Driver’s long TD catch
in the NFC Championship was abysmal and that cannot happen if
New York wants to turn this game into a slugfest.
The Pats are going to score and, unfortunately for the Giants,
they will likely score at least 24-28 points. Brady will have
good protection 85-90% of the time (if not more), so his numbers
will undoubtedly be good once again. The question then becomes
which Patriot will benefit the most. Well, Moss is going to draw
the most attention once again, but you know he’ll be chomping
at the bit after seeing very little action in the first two playoff
games. I would not be the least bit surprised to see the first
New England offensive play be a play-action deep ball into double
coverage where Moss is asked to go and get it. I think regardless
of the attention paid to Moss, he can have an MVP-type performance.
As he has in the previous two postseason contests, Welker figures
to have another standout game. In terms of short-area explosion,
Welker may have the most of any WR I can remember lately. While
he isn’t overly fast, he is nearly uncoverable in third-and-short
situations. Now, how much Gaffney and Stallworth will contribute
will be up to just how effective the Giants’ front four
is. Since I do expect the G-Men to apply a bit of pressure on
Brady, I would opt for Gaffney as he is more likely to break open
quickly and excel in the intermediate passing game. And I tend
to believe that Watson is a slightly better play than his Giant
counterpart (Boss), although both are good options and both defenses
have struggled a bit guarding the TE. I would be remiss if I didn’t
mention Faulk, who could very well have a Dominic Rhodes-like
impact (as in last year’s Super Bowl) on this contest in
the passing game if the Giants’ pass rush is getting to
Brady more than expected.
Running
Game Thoughts: It’s become apparent that while the
Patriots were certainly out to “kill” opponents earlier
in the season, the reason Maroney wasn’t more of a factor
was because: 1) he didn’t need to be and 2) he was more
injured than anyone let on (big surprise). What we do know is
that Maroney – when healthy – can and will be productive.
And after getting Moss established early, the Pats should place
a heavy emphasis on making sure Maroney gets a full load. Because
New England knows that it should be able to pass and score whenever
it wants to, it should not be afraid to keep the ball away from
the Giants’ offense either. The best way to keep New York
from being able to play keep-away with the Pats’ offense
is to make sure that New York has limited opportunities to handle
the ball and to win the field position battle. Of course, I’m
not suggesting that the Pats take the ball out of Brady’s
hands any more than they have to. But New England must understand
that the Giants are one of the few teams stout enough up front
on defense to get to the QB with just four rushers and that one
of the few ways it can lose is if it allows New York the opportunity
to get Jacobs and Bradshaw in rhythm. Thus, I would not be surprised
to see Maroney to match (or surpass) his season high of 26 carries
set in Week 15. He has scored in five straight weeks and has carried
22 or more times three times in the last five games after not
doing so once in the first 14 weeks of the regular season. I don’t
expect huge yardage totals from him, but he should continue to
find the end zone.
Projections:
Tom Brady: 315 pass/3 TD/0 INT
Randy Moss: 75 rec/1 TD
Wes Welker: 95 rec/1 TD
Jabar Gaffney: 45 rec
Donte Stallworth: 25 rec
Ben Watson: 25 rec/1 TD
Laurence Maroney: 70 rush/1 TD/10 rec
Kevin Faulk: 15 rush/40 rec
|