Second Half Fantasy Splits
11/2/06
The “Gut Feeling” is often synonymous with a sense
of desperation resulting from a lack of preparation. The Gut Check
is a huge proponent of studying the numbers, but there’s
a point where one can place too much emphasis on the wrong information.
This can result in the undervaluing or overlooking a player’s
potential. Therefore, The Weekly Gut Check is devoted to examining
the frame of reference behind certain number-driven guidelines
that fantasy football owners use to make decisions.
Although The Weekly Gut Check doesn’t claim to be psychic,
he does believe that he can dispel certain numbers biases and
help you make the best choices for your team. We’ll keep
a running tally of The Weekly Gut Check’s insights. This
way you can gauge his views as something to seriously consider,
or at least seriously consider running the opposite way as fast
as you can!
Strength of schedule is a fantastic tool for your analysis of who
to start, but it’s also worthwhile to approach a problem from
a variety of angles. One alternate direction is to examine the difference
in a player’s performance between the first half and second
half of his season. Sport is a great magnifier of human behavior.
Just look at Terrell Owens and the media’s desire to saturate
its viewers with every little story—both parties want your
attention and believe that sometimes the best way to get it isn’t
to truly earn it.
So the Gut Check wants to give you a good example of how sport
mimics positive human behavior: Fantasy Stat Splits that show
over of a three-year period which players up their performance
the most in the second half of the season. This isn’t a
foolproof method of determining which players are must have, fantasy
personnel because injury, rookie years, and personnel transitions
can have a definite impact on these stats. Nonetheless, it’s
a good place to start. If you saw the Gut Check’s stat
splits for 2002-2004, you knew players like Clinton Portis,
Steve Smith, and Chad Johnson had excellent histories of turning
it up a notch down the stretch.
This year yours truly examines the average split differential
for years 2003-2005 and provides his take on particular players
with numbers that catch his eye.
Quarterbacks
2003 - 2005 |
Last |
First |
Gms |
Avg FPts |
Gms |
Avg FPts |
Diff |
Green |
Trent |
16 |
16.43 |
29 |
21.41 |
4.97 |
Manning |
Peyton |
17 |
20.82 |
28 |
24.76 |
3.94 |
Pennington |
Chad |
8 |
14.59 |
16 |
17.63 |
3.03 |
Vick |
Michael |
11 |
16.94 |
21 |
19.71 |
2.77 |
Palmer |
Carson |
11 |
18.14 |
17 |
20.9 |
2.76 |
Brooks |
Aaron |
18 |
17.54 |
25 |
20.25 |
2.71 |
Johnson |
Brad |
13 |
12.64 |
20 |
15.2 |
2.55 |
Delhomme |
Jake |
16 |
15.98 |
29 |
18.41 |
2.43 |
Brees |
Drew |
17 |
16.86 |
23 |
19 |
2.14 |
Plummer |
Jake |
17 |
17.94 |
24 |
19.85 |
1.9 |
Hasselbeck |
Matt |
16 |
18.22 |
27 |
19.91 |
1.7 |
Collins |
Kerry |
14 |
16.86 |
26 |
18.5 |
1.64 |
Warner |
Kurt |
9 |
15.38 |
12 |
16.73 |
1.35 |
Brady |
Tom |
17 |
18.44 |
28 |
19.34 |
0.89 |
McNabb |
Donovan |
15 |
20.27 |
24 |
20.88 |
0.61 |
Kitna |
Jon |
5 |
16.78 |
15 |
16.39 |
-0.39 |
Leftwich |
Byron |
17 |
16.86 |
21 |
15.45 |
-1.41 |
Favre |
Brett |
17 |
20.03 |
28 |
18.59 |
-1.44 |
McNair |
Steve |
17 |
19.2 |
19 |
17.27 |
-1.93 |
Culpepper |
Daunte |
13 |
26.01 |
22 |
23.92 |
-2.09 |
Harrington |
Joey |
15 |
14.55 |
27 |
12.26 |
-2.29 |
Manning |
Eli |
6 |
17.57 |
16 |
14.95 |
-2.62 |
Brunell |
Mark |
14 |
15.42 |
13 |
12.44 |
-2.98 |
Bulger |
Marc |
16 |
23.18 |
19 |
19.79 |
-3.39 |
Roethlisberger |
Ben |
9 |
18.52 |
17 |
14.8 |
-3.72 |
Bledsoe |
Drew |
17 |
17.91 |
28 |
13.88 |
-4.04 |
Carr |
David |
16 |
18.67 |
25 |
13.31 |
-5.36 |
|
The Gut Check believes some of these numbers might be difficult
to analyze upon first glance. Take Trent Green for example. During
the last three seasons, Green is significantly better during the
second half of the season than in the opening portion of the year.
This year Green is still recovering from a serious concussion
suffered so early in the season that yours truly finds it hard
to believe that Green will put up the kind of numbers he did in
the second halves of 2003-2005. Combine this injury with the rust
factor, and don’t get so excited about adding Trent Green
via free agency that you drop better than average quarterback
in the process. The same should hold true for Aaron Brooks in
a new offense and yet to come back from injury.
On the other hand, Vick, Palmer, and Peyton Manning are all players
that get better as the season progresses. This should definitely
be the case with Palmer. Remember, Palmer had a very serious injury
and returned to action in less time than Daunte Culpepper. Palmer
has been able to play well enough to remain the starter. With
Chris Henry, T.J. Houshmandzadeh, and Chad Jackson all in the
lineup, expect Palmer to continue to improve despite less than
inspiring fantasy production so far.
On the opposite end of the spectrum, Marc Bulger and Eli Manning
have significantly negative differentials from 2003-2005. This
is where injury (Bulger) and the developmental learning curve
(Manning) impact the numbers. Expect Bulger’s numbers to
steadily improve with increasing comfort with the new offensive
scheme—as long as he remains healthy—and Manning has
sufficiently reached the level of proficiency as an NFL starter
to maintain his level of play throughout the year. It’s
also telling how Drew Bledsoe and David Carr’s negative
differentials mimic their performances during the past two weeks.
Both were benched for poor play and Bledsoe has lost his starting
job altogether. Carr’s numbers shouldn’t remain as
bad because he has a better offense around him that has managed
to remain healthy. The Gut Check would recommend you to remain
optimistic with Carr.
Running
Backs 2003 - 2005 |
Last |
First |
Gms |
Avg FPts |
Gms |
Avg FPts |
Diff |
Johnson |
Larry |
6 |
7.82 |
20 |
18.91 |
11.09 |
Barber III |
Marion |
3 |
1.73 |
9 |
9.62 |
7.89 |
Gore |
Frank |
5 |
2.74 |
8 |
8.26 |
5.52 |
Jones |
Kevin |
9 |
6.4 |
17 |
11.61 |
5.21 |
Droughns |
Reuben |
14 |
7.74 |
22 |
12.26 |
4.52 |
McAllister |
Deuce |
15 |
12.41 |
18 |
16.56 |
4.15 |
Johnson |
Rudi |
13 |
10.95 |
29 |
14.66 |
3.71 |
Portis |
Clinton |
16 |
14.14 |
27 |
17.06 |
2.92 |
Jones |
Julius |
6 |
11.65 |
13 |
14.47 |
2.82 |
Bell |
Tatum |
10 |
6.76 |
13 |
8.82 |
2.06 |
Dunn |
Warrick |
18 |
10.95 |
23 |
12.88 |
1.93 |
Barlow |
Kevan |
17 |
8.8 |
24 |
10.5 |
1.7 |
Taylor |
Chester |
15 |
4.16 |
29 |
5.84 |
1.68 |
Westbrook |
Brian |
15 |
12.72 |
24 |
14.1 |
1.38 |
Jordan |
Lamont |
13 |
8.38 |
25 |
9.5 |
1.12 |
McGahee |
Willis |
10 |
11.3 |
19 |
12.27 |
0.97 |
Taylor |
Fred |
17 |
12.08 |
23 |
12.97 |
0.88 |
Jackson |
Steven |
12 |
9.98 |
16 |
10.82 |
0.84 |
Tomlinson |
LaDainian |
17 |
19.06 |
28 |
19.65 |
0.58 |
Dillon |
Corey |
14 |
12.04 |
24 |
12.52 |
0.48 |
Green |
Ahman |
16 |
15.63 |
18 |
16.03 |
0.4 |
Barber |
Tiki |
15 |
16.14 |
30 |
16.29 |
0.15 |
Foster |
DeShaun |
14 |
7.71 |
17 |
7.47 |
-0.24 |
Alexander |
Shaun |
16 |
20.14 |
29 |
19.62 |
-0.52 |
Henry |
Travis |
12 |
9.89 |
19 |
8.94 |
-0.95 |
James |
Edgerrin |
14 |
17.96 |
28 |
16.74 |
-1.23 |
Brown |
Ronnie |
5 |
11 |
9 |
9.5 |
-1.5 |
Brown |
Chris |
15 |
10.4 |
21 |
8.88 |
-1.52 |
Jones |
Thomas |
15 |
12.62 |
26 |
9.67 |
-2.95 |
Rhodes |
Dominic |
9 |
5.33 |
22 |
2.2 |
-3.13 |
Lewis |
Jamal |
15 |
15.69 |
25 |
12.42 |
-3.27 |
Parker |
Willie |
5 |
11.68 |
13 |
8.31 |
-3.37 |
Williams |
Cadillac |
4 |
14.33 |
9 |
10.72 |
-3.6 |
|
From the get go, it’s probably best to be cautious about
the differentials for LJ, Barber III, Gore, and Jones at the top
of this list. All three saw more action in the second half of
the season some time during these three years—and their
sample of games are low. Of these four, the Gut Check believes
Johnson and Jones have the best opportunities to continue performing
at a higher level down in the second half of 2006.
Jones is on a squad that is gaining more offensive consistency
and finally has a coaching staff in place that has enough control
of the team to keep them focused on performing on the field and
not for the news cameras. Johnson was a beast last week and the
offense appears to be getting into more of a comfort zone with
their strategy.
Rueben Droughns finally had a nice game last weekend. Is it a
coincidence that he has one of the better differentials among
backs on this list? What he has in common with McAllister and
Johnson is their tendency to run downhill and wear out opposing
defenses with a punishing style. All three share this trait with
Larry Johnson. Remember, defensive players also wear down as the
season progresses. A punishing back can be a real asset for a
fantasy team this time of year.
With that thought in mind, Thomas Jones and his negative differential
may be an indication of his tendency to wear down. Cedric Benson,
as expected, got more carries last week. Will the trend continue?
The Gut Check thinks so. Benson is a talented back with a more
punishing style. While this might be a raw deal for both Jones
and his fantasy owners, be cognizant of the fact the Chicago Bears
want to introduce their top 10 pick to the starting line up sooner
than later. Only a Priest Holmes type of differential would slow
the timetable for what looks like an inevitable event. While Jamal
Lewis is classified as a power back due to his size, have you
really observed his style of play? If you have, you’ll likely
come to a similar conclusion as the Gut Check: Lewis is a powerful
back in terms of finishing runs but his style is more finesse-based
on cuts and bouncing plays outside than his image suggests. Although
Lewis had nice production last week, he wasn’t very efficient
per carry—less than a 3.5-yard per carry average in the
game.
Another guy that should have production that belies his image
is Fred Taylor. As long as he remains healthy, Taylor could be
that money player for you down the stretch—especially if
rookie Maurice Jones-Drew continues to occasionally—emphasis
on occasionally—spells Taylor to keep him fresh. Many may
believe the opposite is true, but Taylor’s weight loss should
aid his stamina in 2006. And that point should make a big difference
on the stat line.
Wide
Receivers 2003 - 2005 |
Last |
First |
Gms |
Avg FPts |
Gms |
Avg FPts |
Diff |
Evans |
Lee |
11 |
4.55 |
18 |
11.3 |
6.75 |
Clayton |
Mark |
5 |
1.9 |
8 |
7.23 |
5.33 |
Porter |
Jerry |
12 |
4.36 |
27 |
9.5 |
5.14 |
Bennett |
Drew |
16 |
7.85 |
18 |
12.52 |
4.67 |
Brown |
Reggie |
5 |
1.06 |
10 |
5.66 |
4.60 |
Muhammad |
Muhsin |
15 |
6.36 |
29 |
10.61 |
4.25 |
Parker |
Samie |
5 |
4.3 |
8 |
8.26 |
3.96 |
Chambers |
Chris |
15 |
8.07 |
29 |
11.07 |
3.00 |
Kennison |
Eddie |
14 |
7.05 |
29 |
9.96 |
2.91 |
Houshmandzadeh |
T.J. |
8 |
7.85 |
19 |
10.42 |
2.57 |
Harrison |
Marvin |
17 |
11.7 |
26 |
13.92 |
2.22 |
Jones |
Matt |
6 |
3.17 |
9 |
5.31 |
2.14 |
Wilford |
Ernest |
12 |
4.24 |
13 |
6.36 |
2.12 |
Stallworth |
Donte |
18 |
6.28 |
21 |
8.3 |
2.01 |
Smith |
Rod |
18 |
8.15 |
27 |
9.77 |
1.62 |
Horn |
Joe |
16 |
9.24 |
26 |
10.52 |
1.28 |
Johnson |
Chad |
16 |
11.71 |
29 |
12.98 |
1.27 |
Booker |
Marty |
16 |
4.79 |
25 |
6 |
1.21 |
Walker |
Javon |
13 |
9.83 |
18 |
10.69 |
0.86 |
Jackson |
Darrell |
14 |
10.44 |
21 |
11.3 |
0.86 |
Wayne |
Reggie |
17 |
9.53 |
27 |
10.14 |
0.61 |
Givens |
David |
13 |
7.3 |
21 |
7.9 |
0.6 |
Parker |
Eric |
15 |
6.25 |
20 |
6.82 |
0.56 |
Coles |
Laveranues |
18 |
7.57 |
27 |
8.09 |
0.51 |
Driver |
Donald |
16 |
8.57 |
28 |
9.04 |
0.47 |
Smith |
Steve |
12 |
11.98 |
19 |
12.36 |
0.39 |
Moss |
Santana |
14 |
10.66 |
30 |
10.97 |
0.31 |
Branch |
Deion |
13 |
7.3 |
24 |
7.58 |
0.28 |
Clayton |
Michael |
12 |
6.33 |
17 |
6.54 |
0.22 |
Toomer |
Amani |
15 |
6.87 |
30 |
6.92 |
0.05 |
Bruce |
Isaac |
14 |
8.95 |
25 |
8.99 |
0.04 |
Lelie |
Ashley |
18 |
6.78 |
27 |
6.78 |
0.00 |
Fitzgerald |
Larry |
10 |
10.65 |
20 |
10.41 |
-0.24 |
Bryant |
Antonio |
15 |
6.55 |
27 |
6.3 |
-0.24 |
Randle El |
Antwaan |
17 |
4.18 |
28 |
3.92 |
-0.26 |
Owens |
Terrell |
16 |
13.6 |
20 |
13.12 |
-0.48 |
Gabriel |
Doug |
9 |
4.83 |
19 |
4.26 |
-0.58 |
Taylor |
Travis |
11 |
5.41 |
29 |
4.82 |
-0.59 |
McCardell |
Keenan |
11 |
9.92 |
26 |
9.32 |
-0.6 |
Johnson |
Keyshawn |
16 |
8.57 |
24 |
7.71 |
-0.86 |
Edwards |
Braylon |
3 |
7.53 |
7 |
6.66 |
-0.88 |
Holt |
Torry |
17 |
14.39 |
26 |
13.41 |
-0.98 |
Jenkins |
Michael |
6 |
5.02 |
11 |
4 |
-1.02 |
Mason |
Derrick |
17 |
10.24 |
28 |
9.15 |
-1.09 |
Williams |
Roy |
8 |
9.79 |
17 |
8.64 |
-1.15 |
Henry |
Chris |
5 |
6.8 |
8 |
5.53 |
-1.28 |
Battle |
Arnaz |
9 |
4.41 |
9 |
2.97 |
-1.44 |
Boldin |
Anquan |
11 |
12.77 |
26 |
11.18 |
-1.6 |
Ward |
Hines |
16 |
11.83 |
28 |
10.15 |
-1.68 |
Galloway |
Joey |
12 |
9.98 |
24 |
8.15 |
-1.83 |
Burress |
Plaxico |
17 |
9.71 |
24 |
7.81 |
-1.9 |
Johnson |
Andre |
15 |
9.53 |
27 |
7.56 |
-1.97 |
Welker |
Wes |
5 |
4.14 |
10 |
2.12 |
-2.02 |
Moulds |
Eric |
16 |
8.88 |
25 |
6.36 |
-2.53 |
Glenn |
Terry |
14 |
11.39 |
19 |
8.19 |
-3.2 |
Moss |
Randy |
15 |
15.64 |
25 |
11.51 |
-4.13 |
Williamson |
Troy |
5 |
6.42 |
8 |
2.23 |
-4.2 |
|
Not a Lee Evans fan? Maybe you should reconsider. The 3rd-year
Buffalo Bill is a deep ball extraordinaire. Completing these passes
takes good timing on various levels within the offense. On a team
like the Bills, that can mean the second half of the season has
better production than the first. The Gut Check believes Lee Evans
could be a pro bowl receiver if he played for a team like the
Saints.
Jerry Porter’s numbers are more injury-driven. This year
it will likely be doghouse driven—in other words, if he
can stay out of it he’s guaranteed for a positive differential
by default. The real question is whether he’ll be a good
fantasy starter. Right now, the outlook isn’t that great
but he does run better routes than Randy Moss so there’s
a chance he can be decent. Drew Bennett’s numbers are Billy
Volek-2004-driven stats and you shouldn’t take him too seriously
until 2007 when Vince Young makes a bigger leap with his adjustment
to the pro game.
Terry Glenn, Plaxico Burress, and Randy Moss have some troubling
differentials. You should downplay Burress’ negative stats
because he’s been playing for young quarterbacks in the
past three seasons, which means he’s been a victim of them
“hitting the wall” towards season’s end. The
other two are players a fantasy owner should have legitimate worries
about their production down the stretch. Both are playing with
young quarterbacks with little in-game experience. Don’t
expect great totals from either player—especially when at
least one of their quarterbacks hits that wall in 2006.
If you’re in a high risk-high reward mood, take a chance
on acquiring Donte Stallworth or Chris Chambers for your stretch
run. Both players are risks for different reasons, but they traditionally
have nice second halves—especially Chambers. It will be
difficult to believe the Dolphins receiver and Harrington will
be out of sync much longer. The Gut Check believes an explosion
is an imminent possibility. If you’ve got nothing to lose
(or at least play with this mentality) take the chance.
Tight
Ends 2003 - 2005 |
Last |
First |
Gms |
Avg FPts |
Gms |
Avg FF Pts |
Diff |
Gonzalez |
Tony |
16 |
6.31 |
29 |
10.18 |
3.87 |
Gates |
Antonio |
13 |
8.6 |
24 |
11.57 |
2.97 |
Clark |
Dallas |
13 |
3.71 |
22 |
6.2 |
2.5 |
Fletcher |
Bryan |
5 |
1.28 |
9 |
3.53 |
2.25 |
Watson |
Ben |
7 |
3 |
8 |
4.85 |
1.85 |
Heap |
Todd |
12 |
6.08 |
24 |
7.91 |
1.83 |
Sellers |
Mike |
6 |
2.37 |
9 |
4.01 |
1.64 |
Alexander |
Stephen |
11 |
1.05 |
18 |
2.63 |
1.58 |
Witten |
Jason |
14 |
5.51 |
26 |
6.93 |
1.42 |
Kinney |
Erron |
15 |
3.84 |
21 |
4.72 |
0.88 |
Pollard |
Marcus |
13 |
4.68 |
25 |
5.35 |
0.66 |
Cooley |
Chris |
9 |
6.17 |
18 |
6.78 |
0.62 |
Putzier |
Jeb |
11 |
3.8 |
17 |
4.03 |
0.23 |
Franks |
Bubba |
15 |
3.64 |
21 |
3.82 |
0.18 |
Kelly |
Reggie |
13 |
1.22 |
18 |
1.21 |
-0.01 |
Gaines |
Michael |
5 |
2.48 |
8 |
2.31 |
-0.17 |
Martin |
David |
10 |
3 |
15 |
2.61 |
-0.39 |
Graham |
Daniel |
15 |
5.44 |
20 |
4.86 |
-0.59 |
Smith |
Alex |
6 |
3.55 |
9 |
2.8 |
-0.75 |
Kleinsasser |
Jim |
9 |
3.39 |
20 |
2.57 |
-0.82 |
Crumpler |
Alge |
18 |
7.29 |
26 |
6.47 |
-0.83 |
Wiggins |
Jermaine |
9 |
5.6 |
25 |
4.54 |
-1.06 |
Clark |
Desmond |
13 |
3.71 |
27 |
2.62 |
-1.09 |
Troupe |
Ben |
9 |
4.33 |
17 |
3.21 |
-1.13 |
Stevens |
Jerramy |
11 |
5.03 |
22 |
3.76 |
-1.26 |
Shockey |
Jeremy |
15 |
8.49 |
24 |
7.16 |
-1.32 |
Wrighster |
George |
10 |
3.43 |
15 |
1.9 |
-1.53 |
Baker |
Chris |
14 |
3.63 |
15 |
2.08 |
-1.55 |
Miller |
Heath |
5 |
6.08 |
10 |
4.53 |
-1.55 |
McMichael |
Randy |
16 |
6.93 |
28 |
5.15 |
-1.77 |
Anderson |
Courtney |
10 |
4.74 |
11 |
2.22 |
-2.52 |
Smith |
L.J. |
11 |
6.7 |
26 |
4.08 |
-2.62 |
Conwell |
Ernie |
14 |
4.85 |
9 |
1.31 |
-3.54 |
Johnson |
Eric |
6 |
10.07 |
9 |
3.48 |
-6.59 |
|
Tony Gonzalez has been the 2006 poster child for the term overrated
fantasy player when it came to draft position, but his differential
is tops during the past three seasons. As the running game continues
to have more success, look for the natural complement of the tight
end open down the middle in the passing game to rise to the forefront
in Kansas City.
Do you like Todd Heap as a fantasy player? Keep liking him, because
he’s steady good—the same goes for Jason Witten. Can’t
really say the same about Jeremy Shockey, but remember the Plaxico
Burress factor the Gut Check just discussed? Keep that in mind
when talking about Shockey.
L.J. Smith had a huge drop off, but did that have to do with
the team imploding last year? The Gut Check thinks so. As long
as McNabb stays healthy, Smith should continue having a solid
year for fantasy owners.
When it comes to fantasy point splits, remember that injury,
rookie seasons, and unusually soft/difficult schedules have an
impact on these numbers. Yet, when you pair this information with
Mike MacGregor’s strength of schedule tables, you have enough
data to make some solid personnel decisions for your squad.
Team Updates
Fantasy
Auctioneer Experts Invitational: Two lineup mishaps cost the
Gut Check the opportunity to remained tied for first place in
his division: benching McNair for Carr and opting for Cadillac
over Fred Taylor. While Carr’s poor game was hopefully a
fluke, Fred Taylor (as mentioned above) is looking good. These
mistakes resulted in a three-point loss. The problem is yours
truly trust McNair’s match up more than Carr and Cadillac’s
opportunities than Taylor’s. This squad is third in power
ranking despite a mediocre, 81% lineup efficiency score. As yours
truly gets better picking his line up, this team should be very
good down the stretch.
Projected Starting Lineup: McNair,
Jackson, Taylor, Derek Hagan, Donald Driver, Joe Horn, Todd Heap,
Josh Scobee, and the Ravens Defense.
Ironman
3 Dynasty League (40-man rosters with IDP): Two in a row for
yours truly (team name Out To Lunch) with a solid, 187-point game
thanks to comeback points on Monday night from Mike Vrabel and
Doug Gabriel. Now at 4-4, and three games back from Mike MacGregor’s
division-leading juggernaut, the Gut Check suddenly has some running
back depth with Wali Lundy and Brandon Jacobs to back up Westbrook
and Cadillac. Lundy might beat out Cadillac for the #2 RB spot
next week. Now he just needs Fitzgerald to return to health and
productivity in week 10 (or Jerry Porter to stay out of the Raiders
doghouse), and yours truly has a shot at contending.
Projected Starting Lineup: McNair,
Lundy, Cadillac, Gabriel, Berrian, Porter, McMichael, Vinatieri,
Rod Coleman, James Hall, Kyle Vanden Bosch, Derrick Johnson, Michael
Boley, Julian Peterson, Mike Vrabel, Walt Harris, Charles Woodson,
Sean Jones, and Glenn Earl.
SOFA
Fantasy Auction League: Let’s call it a 4-game winning
streak thanks to more LT and huge games from Reggie Wayne and
Ben Watson—yes, a Ben Watson fantasy sighting! Thought it
might never happen at this rate. Vince Young continues to make
a compelling argument to start for his squad.
Projected Starting Lineup: Young
(or Brunell if yours truly chickens out), LT, Cadillac, Driver,
Toomer, Wayne, Watson, free agent kicker, and Saints.
MADFAD (Dynasty Contract League w/IDP and
Fluctuating Player Values): His first three-game losing
streak in this league during its 6-year history. A 3 or 4-game
winning streak could turn the fortunes around for this team, but
Chad Johnson and Randy Moss need return to form. Looks like a
long season, but this team has too many good young players to
ditch just to win now.
Projected Starting Lineup: McNair,
Dillon (or Maroney), Cadillac, C. Johnson, Galloway, Berrian,
Shockey, Bullock, Vilma, Feeley, Hali, Dumervil, Polamalu, and
A. Wilson.
Local League (Traditional re-draft and
scoring): Another CBS league, the Gut Check finally won
and won big this week—thanks to LJ, Colston, and the Ravens
defense. Despite a 4-4 record, yours truly is now the scoring
leader in this league. Still, Galloway and Harrison’s efforts
were a bit troubling. Harrison should bounce back—it made
sense for Manning to exploit Darrent Williams on Reggie Wayne.
Here’s hoping Chris Henry can continue to hold it together
between Sundays and Greg Jennings returns to health before the
Gut Check’s receiving corps implodes.
Projected Lineup: Favre, LJ,
Jones, Joey Galloway, Marques Colston, Samie Parker (Hagan or
Henry), Marvin Harrison, Todd Heap, Mike Vanderjagt, and Ravens
Defense.
FFTOC: What a fall from grace this
week—dropping 47 spots after a 67-point whimper. This week
needs to be much better to remain comfortably within range of
making the final cut.
Fantasy Football Handbook Expert Mock:
The Gut check remained at 5th overall, but still one excellent
game from jumping into the top three. This week was a 135-point
effort—about 20 points over his average—but three
other teams had similar outings and maintained their lead. You
can select the
link for the roster to see the Gut Check’s options…
|