Second Half Wonders: Next Season’s
Studs Or A Dud Of A Theory?
6/6/06
The “Gut Feeling” is often synonymous with a sense
of desperation resulting from a lack of preparation. The Gut Check
is a huge proponent of studying the numbers, but there’s
a point where one can place too much emphasis on the wrong information.
This can result in the undervaluing or overlooking a player’s
potential. Therefore, The Weekly Gut Check is devoted to examining
the frame of reference behind certain number-driven guidelines
that fantasy football owners use to make decisions.
Although The Weekly Gut Check doesn’t claim to be psychic,
he does believe that he can dispel certain numbers biases and
help you make the best choices for your team. We’ll keep
a running tally of The Weekly Gut Check’s insights. This
way you can gauge his views as something to seriously consider,
or at least seriously consider running the opposite way as fast
as you can!
It’s one of the more common reasons fantasy owners use to
tout a sleeper: He had a great stretch run last season. Somehow
many owners have come to believe that a high level of performance
from the second half of the previous season is a good predictor
for success in the following year. The Gut Check thought it might
be a good idea to profile players that had a significantly better
second half in 2005. These were players that haven’t been
top tier players lately, or are still learning the pro game:
QB: Kurt Warner, Brad Johnson,
and Kyle Boller
RB: Samkon Gado, Frank Gore,
Greg Jones, and Cedric Houston
WR: Roy Williams, Reggie Brown,
Amani Toomer, and Mark Clayton
TE: Adam Bergen and Chris Cooley
There are definitely some familiar faces on the list. But does
history support this theory? Or does this train of thought never
leave the station? The Gut Check believes you can get some mileage
out of this theory, and it’s a good place to begin your
search for ascending talent for the coming year. The information
yours truly will provide may have some use for those of you that
need additional criteria to refine your projections in the final
stages of draft day preparation.
The Gut Check took a sample of offensive skill players that had
a statistically significant improvement in production during the
second half of a season and then checked to see how well the player
maintained this level of improvement during the next season. Beginning
with wide receivers sampled from 2002-2004, the Second Half
Wonder Theory has some juice:
Second
Half Wonders: Wide Receivers |
WRs |
2002 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2003 Status |
Wayne Chrebet |
6.1 |
9.7 |
37% |
5 |
52% |
Hurt |
Darrell Jackson |
6.3 |
12.3 |
49% |
11.2 |
91% |
Starter |
James McKnight |
2.8 |
8.0 |
65% |
4.6 |
58% |
Hurt |
Koren Robinson |
6.8 |
13.1 |
48% |
7.7 |
59% |
Starter |
Travis Taylor |
6.5 |
10.1 |
36% |
5.5 |
54% |
Starter |
Amani Toomer |
7.4 |
15.4 |
52% |
8.5 |
55% |
Starter |
WRs |
2003 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2004 Status |
Anquan Boldin |
7.4 |
13.1 |
44% |
6.86 |
52% |
Hurt |
Bobby Engram |
4.2 |
8.8 |
52% |
4.8 |
55% |
NS |
Az Hakim |
1.9 |
9.1 |
79% |
7.13 |
78% |
Shared |
Mushin Muhammad |
4.4 |
8.8 |
50% |
14.9 |
169% |
Starter |
Todd Pinkston |
3.04 |
6.4 |
53% |
5.6 |
88% |
Shared |
Marcus Robinson |
0.9 |
10.8 |
92% |
7.6 |
70% |
Shared |
WRs |
2004 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2005 Status |
Drew Bennett |
8.3 |
18.2 |
54% |
7.5 |
41% |
Hurt |
Antonio Bryant |
4.5 |
9 |
50% |
7.8 |
87% |
Starter |
Nate Burleson |
7.8 |
12.2 |
36% |
3.2 |
26% |
Hurt |
Lee Evans |
5.7 |
12.8 |
55% |
7.5 |
59% |
Starter |
Joey Galloway |
2.2 |
12.5 |
82% |
11.2 |
90% |
Starter |
T.J. Housmandzadeh |
4.9 |
11.7 |
58% |
10.7 |
91% |
Starter |
Dennis Northcutt |
3.2 |
8.6 |
63% |
3.7 |
43% |
Shared |
Jerry Porter |
6.1 |
13.3 |
54% |
7.7 |
58% |
Hurt |
Donte Stallworth |
5.2 |
8.8 |
41% |
8.5 |
97% |
Starter |
Total Sample |
5.39 |
11.45 |
53% |
9.35 |
82% |
|
|
The two numbers under after the receiver’s name are the
fantasy points per game averaged from weeks 1-8 and 9-17, respectively.
The % column is the percentage increase
from the first half of the season to the second half. Next
Yr is the average fantasy points per game for the next
season. Attainment is how close
did the Next Yr numbers approach
the production in the second half of the previous year.
The most noticeable trend is a receiver that exhibits a significant
jump in production during the second half of a season has a pretty
high likelihood of maintaining that jump in production if they
are the starter and remain healthy during the following year.
From 2003-2005 (representing “the following year,”
for 2002-2004), 60% of the second-half wonder receivers that were
healthy and in the starting lineup for their teams the next year
attained at least 87% of their previous year’s jump in production.
Five out of the six receivers were over 90% attainment and one
exceeded his second half improvement. Overall, the second half
wonders generally increased their production by 53% of their first
half totals. In the following year they maintained at least 82%
of their fantasy points per game average.
Let’s look at the second half of 2005 for these receivers
I mentioned at the beginning of the column:
Name |
Team |
Year |
2nd Half Avg. |
2006* |
Rank** |
Roy Williams |
DET |
2005 |
10.2 |
8.87 |
18th |
Reggie Brown |
PHI |
2005 |
7.87 |
6.85 |
35th |
Amani Toomer |
NYG |
2005 |
8.14 |
7.08 |
21st |
Mark Clayton |
BAL |
2005 |
7.58 |
6.59 |
36th |
* 2006 projected fpts/gm
based on attainment research described above with 87%
minimum attainment.
** Projected positional rank based on 2005's fpts/gm
totals. |
|
If 2006 followed the same tendency as 2003-2005 all four receivers
would at least produce as worthwhile starters in a 3-receiver
starting line up in a 12-team league. Williams and Brown will
be the higher profile, mid-round picks, but Toomer and Clayton
could provide undervalued depth at the bottom third of fantasy
drafts.
Second half wonders at running back have nearly the same probability
(63%) as receivers to maintain at least 87% of that production
the following year if they start and stay healthy—even higher
(72%) if you only expect the runner to attain at least 80%.
Second
Half Wonders: Running Backs |
RBs |
2002 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2003 Status |
Tiki Barber |
14.6 |
18.3 |
20% |
11.6 |
63% |
Starter |
Zack Crockett |
3.5 |
8.6 |
59% |
4.4 |
51% |
NS |
Warrick Dunn |
10.3 |
13.5 |
24% |
11.9 |
88% |
Starter |
William Green |
2.7 |
14.3 |
81% |
9.5 |
66% |
Hurt |
Curtis Martin |
9.6 |
13.8 |
30% |
10.6 |
77% |
Starter |
Clinton Portis |
12.4 |
23.7 |
48% |
21.1 |
89% |
Starter |
Tyrone Wheatley |
2.1 |
6.6 |
68% |
6.92 |
105% |
Shared |
RBs |
2003 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2004 Status |
Kevan Barlow |
6.4 |
15.5 |
59% |
9.7 |
63% |
Starter |
Jerome Bettis |
5.1 |
11.4 |
55% |
12.6 |
111% |
Starter |
T.J. Duckett |
7.7 |
11.4 |
32% |
8.3 |
73% |
Shared |
Marshall Faulk |
12.2 |
20.5 |
40% |
9.45 |
46% |
Shared |
Thomas Jones |
2 |
10.5 |
81% |
12.8 |
122% |
Starter |
Brian Westbrook |
7.7 |
12.3 |
37% |
15.8 |
128% |
Starter |
RBs |
2004 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2005 Status |
Tatum Bell |
3 |
12 |
75% |
9.4 |
78% |
Shared |
Derrick Blaylock |
7.4 |
14.6 |
49% |
1 |
7% |
NS |
Nick Goings |
3.5 |
17 |
79% |
1.7 |
10% |
NS |
Stephen Jackson |
5.4 |
10.3 |
48% |
13.1 |
127% |
Starter |
Larry Johnson |
12.5 |
26 |
52% |
21 |
81% |
Starter/Shared |
Kevin Jones |
6.2 |
15.8 |
61% |
8.25 |
52% |
Shared |
Willis McGahee |
9.6 |
17 |
44% |
10.8 |
64% |
Starter |
Ladanian Tomlinson |
16 |
21.4 |
25% |
18.9 |
88% |
Starter |
Total Sample |
9.08 |
15.98 |
43% |
13.77 |
86% |
|
|
Three of the seven players that attained at least 88% of their
previous second half productivity average actually exceeded this
total over the course of the next season—and it was often
a significant increase. Funny as it sounds, the player that accounted
for the lowest attainment percentage from his previous season
was Larry Johnson, who had one of the best second-half stretches
for a fantasy runner ever. Johnson’s case is certainly one
where you have to discount the attainment, especially when he
still averaged over 20 points per game—a level production
every fantasy owner hopes they get from a back.
Heading into this season, there are three backs that qualified
as second half wonders. None of the four are slated as the undisputed
starter heading into camp, but each has an opportunity to take
that role before the season begins.
Name |
Team |
Year |
2nd Half Avg. |
2006* |
Rank** |
Samkon Gado |
GB |
2005 |
13.49 |
11.87 |
11th |
Greg Jones |
JAC |
2005 |
9.36 |
8.24 |
25th |
Frank Gore |
SF |
2005 |
8.57 |
7.54 |
27th |
* 2006 projected fpts/gm
based on attainment research described above with 88%
minimum attainment.
** Projected positional rank based on 2005's fpts/gm
totals. |
|
If Ahman Green is 100% at the start of the season, Gado will
likely be the change of pace back, at best. This also depends
on Najeh Davenport’s rehabilitation. Still, neither Green
nor Davenport is a lock to be ready by opening day. If Gado winds
up the starter, he should be almost as much of a bargain as he
was in 2005.
Jacksonville’s Greg Jones has to compete with Fred Taylor,
Labrandon Toefield, and rookie Maurice Jones-Drew, but Jones had
some impressive moments in Taylor’s absence. The selection
of Jones-Drew could either signify the Jagaur’s desire to
build its own big back-small back rotation, or there is a lack
of confidence in Toefield or Jones to take the role. The Gut Check
believes Jones showed enough promise that Maurice Jones-Drew is
viewed more as a complement (although he has the talent to surprise
on the level of Warrick Dunn has as a Buc and Falcon) and Toefiled
as the steady depth. If Taylor remains in Jacksonville, Jones
is a late-round pick, at best.
The most intriguing back on this list is Gore. The Niners’
second-year runner from Miami displayed the kind of explosion
as a rookie two years removed from ACL surgery that Hurricane
fans and scouts did not witness during his senior season. Gore
and Barlow will vie for the starting position, but one has to
think Mike Nolan will favor his draft pick if their preseason
performances are similar. The addition of future Hall of Fame
guard Larry Allen and the return of Jonas Jennings should bolster
the offensive line for the rushing attack to improve in 2006.
The tight end position has a less dramatic points swing for second
half wonders, but their attainment percentage for the following
season is higher than receivers and backs.
Second
Half Wonders: Tight Ends |
TEs |
2002 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2003 Status |
Alge Crumpler |
3.4 |
6.1 |
44% |
4.6 |
75% |
Starter |
Doug Jolley |
3.4 |
6.4 |
47% |
2.8 |
44% |
Shared |
Jeremy Shockey |
4.8 |
8.1 |
41% |
7.2 |
89% |
Starter/hurt |
Jerramy Stevens |
2.3 |
6.1 |
62% |
1.4 |
23% |
Shared/hurt |
TEs |
2003 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2004 Status |
Jed Weaver |
1.8 |
4.6 |
61% |
2.3 |
50% |
NS |
Boo Williams |
2.1 |
8.6 |
76% |
3.4 |
40% |
Shared |
Jason Witten |
2.0 |
4.8 |
58% |
8.4 |
175% |
Starter |
TEs |
2004 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2005 Status |
Ben Troupe |
1.9 |
3.8 |
50% |
4.4 |
116% |
Starter/hurt |
Total Sample |
3.1 |
5.84 |
47% |
5.48 |
94% |
|
|
Three of the four second half wonders that started the next year
were nearly as good as their previous year’s stretch run,
if not significantly better. Although two of these three tight
ends were injured for significant portions of their follow up
season, their level of production and games started were high
enough to include in this sample.
Despite this nice-looking track record with the statistics, the
prospects for 2006 don’t look all that great.
Name |
Team |
Year |
2nd Half Avg. |
2006* |
Rank** |
Adam Bergen |
ARI |
2005 |
3.13 |
2.79 |
23rd |
Chris Cooley |
WAS |
2005 |
8.14 |
7.24 |
3rd |
* 2006 projected fpts/gm
based on attainment research described above with 89%
minimum attainment.
** Projected positional rank based on 2005's fpts/gm
totals. |
|
Bergen had minimal success as a fantasy tight end even during
his second half of 2005. At best, he appears to be a fantasy back
up that should be available on most waiver wires as the season
begins. Cardinals’ rookie Leonard Pope will be considered
the favorite to start on opening day. Still, Bergen has potential
to be a great bargain if the rookie falters.
Cooley was good enough to be a top five, fantasy producer at
his position in 2005. His second half was over 2 points per game
better than his first half, but the following season projections
would only put him one notch above where he ended up in 2005.
Any way you look at it, Cooley is a very good fantasy tight end.
Quarterbacks have the best follow up seasons when it comes to
attaining their second half numbers from the season before. Once
football no longer feels like practicing organic chemistry in
pads, it makes sense a starting quarterback that has made the
adjustment to the NFL will continue to improve. This goes for
veterans changing teams—just to a lesser extent.
Second
Half Wonders: Quarterbacks |
QBs |
2002 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2003 Status |
Matt Hasselbeck |
9.7 |
26 |
63% |
20 |
77% |
Starter |
Brad Johnson |
15.2 |
20.39 |
25% |
18.6 |
91% |
Starter |
Michael Vick |
20 |
25.7 |
22% |
15.35 |
60% |
Hurt |
QBs |
2003 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2004 Status |
Donovan McNabb |
12.8 |
21.9 |
42% |
23.8 |
109% |
Starter |
QBs |
2004 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2005 Status |
Kerry Collins |
15 |
22.4 |
33% |
16.33 |
73% |
Starter |
Eli Manning |
7.5 |
12.3 |
39% |
18.6 |
151% |
Starter |
Carson Palmer |
13.5 |
20.4 |
34% |
20.6 |
101% |
Starter |
Total Sample |
12.28 |
20.57 |
40% |
19.66 |
96% |
|
|
Exactly two-thirds of the second half wonders at QB had close
to the same, or better, follow up season. Two of the quarterbacks
were first-year starters, Eli Manning and Carson Palmer. Although
Matt Hasselbeck and Kerry Collins didn’t reach the desired
attainment percentages, their fantasy totals made them decent
starters—especially Hasselbeck. In fact half of the quarterbacks
exceeded their second-half numbers in the follow-up season and
were averaging fantasy points that made them quality #1 fantasy
starters (Johnson and Manning), if not outright studs at the position
(McNabb and Palmer).
Last year’s second half wonders at quarterback project
as decent backups with one dramatic exception:
Name |
Team |
Year |
2nd Half Avg. |
2006* |
Rank** |
Kyle Boller |
BAL |
2005 |
17.4 |
15.83 |
15th |
Kurt Warner |
ARI |
2005 |
20.2 |
18.38 |
5th |
Brad Johnson |
MIN |
2005 |
14.7 |
13.38 |
19th |
* 2006 projected fpts/gm
based on attainment research described above with 91%
minimum attainment.
** Projected positional rank based on 2005's fpts/gm
totals. |
|
Boller and Johnson should be valued as solid depth in 2006 fantasy
drafts. Of course, Steve McNair could ruin it if the Ravens and
Titans work out a deal. Kurt Warner was a player the Gut Check
was able to use for a championship stretch run, and with the addition
of Edgerrin James and Leonard Pope, Warner should continue to
thrive in Arizona. Is Warner worth picking as a top five, fantasy
QB? The Gut Check thinks most owners will value him with more
caution, but it doesn’t mean you should hope for him to
slide too far down the positional rankings. Picking Warner somewhere
as the 8th-12th QB off the board is probably a decent consideration.
In conclusion, here’s what to consider with second half
wonders:
- Look for players that had a season where their second
half fantasy point per game average exceeded the first half by
at least 40%.
- Target the players that had this increase in production
and are slated to be a starter.
- If these starters remain healthy, you can reasonably
expect similar, if not significantly better, production out of
these players for the coming year.
Clearly there aren’t a lot of gems in this group, but it
should give you a more realistic way to project this season’s
performance of the dozen skill players that qualified as productive
performers down the stretch of 2005.
|