Big Play Artists and Grinders at QB
and RB
11/1/07
The “Gut Feeling” is often synonymous with a sense
of desperation resulting from a lack of preparation. The Gut Check
is a huge proponent of studying the numbers, but there’s
a point where one can place too much emphasis on the wrong information.
This can result in the undervaluing or overlooking a player’s
potential. Therefore, The Weekly Gut Check is devoted to examining
the frame of reference behind certain number-driven guidelines
that fantasy football owners use to make decisions.
Although The Weekly Gut Check doesn’t claim to be psychic,
he does believe that he can dispel certain numbers biases and
help you make the best choices for your team. We’ll keep
a running tally of The Weekly Gut Check’s insights. This
way you can gauge his views as something to seriously consider,
or at least seriously consider running the opposite way as fast
as you can!
The two most exciting players for a fantasy owner come from opposite
spectrums. There’s the guy who is like a fantasy point slot
machine rigged in your favor: On a single play he’ll give
you 8-10 points, and often do it 2-3 times in the same game. Then
there’s your very own fantasy football point-production line:
You simply turn on the television and watch his team feed him the
ball in predictably frequent intervals, as he churns out 1-3 points
per touch. Whether it’s the lightning strike of the former,
or the constant jackhammer of the latter, you’re more often
than not going to be feeling great on Monday and Tuesday mornings
at the expense of your league if you have enough of these players
on your squad.
Who are these guys at the halfway point of the 2007 season? How
do we determine the Big Play Artist and the Grinder?
Do some of these players possess the best of both worlds? How
does Crank Score fit into the equation? Does Mike
Krueger really exist or is he a figment of the FFToday Board’s
collective imagination? Fortunately, I have answers for 80% of
these questions below and I’ll explore the same stat for
running backs and receivers in the coming weeks.
The Lamonica School of Big Play Quarterbacks
When the Raiders were actually a dangerous offense, The Mad Bomber,
Darryl Lamonica, manned the helm. So we’re labeling this
category in honor of the guy who represents the best of the vertical
passing game. The criteria I am using to determine these Mad Bombers
is yards per completion. Here are the top 49 signal callers ranked
by this stat. Note the number to the left of the player is his
FFToday ranking by total fantasy points and the Crank
Score is only available for quarterbacks with a minimum of
four games.
The Lamonica School |
Player |
TM |
Fpts/G |
Yds/Comp |
Crank |
3. Derek Anderson |
CLE |
24.3 |
14.66 |
52.1 |
2. Tony Romo |
DAL |
26.2 |
13.23 |
56.11 |
44. Kellen Clemens |
NYJ |
7.4 |
12.48 |
N/A |
6. Ben Roethlisberger |
PIT |
20.8 |
12.36 |
29.64 |
49. Tim Rattay |
ARI |
6.3 |
12.31 |
N/A |
1. Tom Brady |
NE |
32 |
12.28 |
116.02 |
10. Donovan McNabb |
PHI |
18.3 |
12.28 |
5.22 |
25. Kurt Warner |
ARI |
12.4 |
12.26 |
20.76 |
41. Kelly Holcomb |
MIN |
11.2 |
12.17 |
N/A |
4. Peyton Manning |
IND |
22.1 |
12.05 |
60.06 |
34. Tarvaris Jackson |
MIN |
11.4 |
11.93 |
-11.36 |
9. Matt Hasselbeck |
SEA |
18.8 |
11.92 |
26.83 |
14. Philip Rivers |
SD |
17 |
11.72 |
16.97 |
5. Carson Palmer |
CIN |
21.9 |
11.72 |
18.78 |
15. Jay Cutler |
DEN |
18.6 |
11.72 |
5.29 |
23. Daunte Culpepper |
OAK |
15.9 |
11.69 |
0 |
8. Jeff Garcia |
TB |
16.9 |
11.65 |
8.44 |
21. David Garrard |
JAC |
15.7 |
11.64 |
5.23 |
27. Trent Green |
MIA |
14.5 |
11.61 |
8.71 |
17. Jason Campbell |
WAS |
15.6 |
11.39 |
11.11 |
29. Jake Delhomme |
CAR |
22 |
11.38 |
N/A |
18. Brian Griese |
CHI |
21.6 |
11.38 |
51.91 |
19. Matt Schaub |
HOU |
13.3 |
11.36 |
0 |
12. Jon Kitna |
DET |
17.6 |
11.35 |
17.64 |
35. Josh McCown |
OAK |
15.1 |
11.23 |
N/A |
43. J.P. Losman |
BUF |
6.9 |
11.15 |
-6.88 |
31. Sage Rosenfels |
HOU |
13 |
10.96 |
N/A |
45. Kerry Collins |
TEN |
5.3 |
10.95 |
N/A |
24. Marc Bulger |
STL |
13.1 |
10.92 |
4.37 |
7. Eli Manning |
NYG |
17.6 |
10.92 |
11.02 |
38. Gus Frerotte |
STL |
9.5 |
10.87 |
0 |
36. Matt Leinart |
ARI |
8.9 |
10.78 |
-1.78 |
13. Brett Favre |
GB |
20.4 |
10.72 |
41.74 |
20. Damon Huard |
KC |
13.9 |
10.65 |
1.99 |
42. Rex Grossman |
CHI |
10 |
10.64 |
N/A |
22. Joey Harrington |
ATL |
12.5 |
10.42 |
3.58 |
16. Chad Pennington |
NYJ |
15.7 |
10.28 |
13.48 |
47. Byron Leftwich |
ATL |
4.5 |
10.18 |
N/A |
32. Alex Smith |
SF |
9.8 |
10.02 |
-9.77 |
26. Cleo Lemon |
MIA |
18.5 |
9.9 |
23.09 |
37. Trent Edwards |
BUF |
8.8 |
9.88 |
-8.84 |
39. Trent Dilfer |
SF |
9.2 |
9.85 |
N/A |
48. Quinn Gray |
JAC |
4.2 |
9.75 |
N/A |
28. Vince Young |
TEN |
11.5 |
9.43 |
3.85 |
33. Kyle Boller |
BAL |
7.9 |
9.19 |
-9.46 |
11. Drew Brees |
NO |
17.9 |
9.11 |
15.38 |
40. David Carr |
CAR |
7 |
9.02 |
-8.76 |
46. Vinny Testaverde |
CAR |
9.5 |
9 |
N/a |
30. Steve McNair |
BAL |
14.2 |
8.95 |
0 |
|
As you can see, there are a significant amount of signal callers
who average a fair number of fantasy points per game, but are distributed
evenly throughout the points per completion ranking. Eli
Manning and Drew
Brees are both in the lower half of quarterbacks in this stat,
but are ranked 7th and 11th, respectively. Both teams have been
using short and intermediate routes, although Manning has a respectable
4 scores from a distance of 30 yards or greater. Brett
Favre certainly has some huge plays (5 touchdowns from at least
30 yards out—two on Monday night), but his offense is still a west
coast-derived system. It’s a bit surprising that the gunslinger
has such a low yard per completion average. But he’s one of the
most consistent fantasy producers according to the Crank Score and
if the Pack can generate a ground game, the play action pass will
produce the type of big plays Favre made against the Broncos. I’m
just not convinced the Packers found their man in Ryan Grant.
The most efficient vertical offense in terms of yardage goes
to the Cleveland Browns. No, I didn’t stutter—Derek
Anderson has two big-time deep threats in WR Braylon Edwards
and TE Kellen Winslow II and Cleveland has been significantly
more successful than the Indy, Dallas, and New England with a
whopping 14.66 yards per completion—no one else is even within
a yard of them! As a childhood fan that grew up just a half hour
from Municipal Stadium, what in the name of Brian Sipe is going
on here? Did Romeo Crennell turn into Sam Rutigliano over the
summer? Cleveland’s draft picks (Edwards and Winslow) and agent
additions (especially the offensive line) are paying dividends.
Anderson is just playing lights out football, because that 4th-ranked
Crank Score supports the fact that he’s not only making big plays,
but also he’s making the small ones to get points from any distance.
Did you notice Big Ben
Roethlisberger is up there among the leaders? You say Pittsburgh
is a running team? Yep, but a team that can force an opposing
safety into the box is also smart to throw it over that defender’s
head. The Steelers have one of the best young deep threats available
in Santonio Holmes and a crafty veteran who just knows how to
get separation anywhere on the field in Hines Ward. I wish I had
Roethlisberger on every fantasy squad this year. He’s quietly
having a great year.
In contrast, Donovan McNabb has been wildly inconsistent as he’s
returned from injury, but he’s the 7th-rated, yard per completion
QB (and 5th when you factor out Rattay and Clemens). His receivers
have their share of drops, but McNabb’s initial lack of
mobility has hindered his opportunity to convert plays that he
used to make in previous years. I think his ability to move in
the pocket against a young and athletic, Vikings defensive line
is a promising sign that McNabb is poised for a strong second
half—something I’ve mentioned before.
Joey Harrington, Steve McNair, and Vince Young have been awful
fantasy starters. Interestingly enough, each team had a more aggressive
option to use in their place in the same way Arizona got more
than 2 yards per catch in production from Kurt Warner than Matt
Leinart. When you have receivers like Fitzgerald and Boldin and
a grind it out runner like James, you better get the ball down
field. Warner proved it was possible with the stats. If he can
manage to play well through the pain, he’s a promising option.
I’m not sure there’s much hope for any Falcons, Ravens,
and Titans QBs this season. If McNair and Clayton can establish
something, this could change but we all know at this stage of
#9’s career, he’s captain check-down. It doesn’t
help the o-line is not what it used to be. The light could suddenly
come on for Young, but is that something worth waiting for as
a fantasy owner entering week 9?
The Mouse Davis Chuck N’ Duck School
The Mouse Davis Chuck N’
Duck School |
Player |
TM |
Fpts/G |
Yds/Comp |
Crank |
13. Brett Favre |
GB |
20.4 |
43.2 |
41.74 |
11. Drew Brees |
NO |
17.9 |
42.4 |
15.38 |
18. Brian Griese |
CHI |
21.6 |
42.2 |
51.91 |
30. Steve McNair |
BAL |
14.2 |
41.5 |
0 |
26. Cleo Lemon |
MIA |
18.5 |
37.8 |
23.09 |
5. Carson Palmer |
CIN |
21.9 |
37.6 |
18.78 |
10. Donovan McNabb |
PHI |
18.3 |
37.3 |
5.22 |
2. Tony Romo |
DAL |
26.2 |
36.1 |
56.11 |
24. Marc Bulger |
STL |
13.1 |
35.5 |
4.37 |
9. Matt Hasselbeck |
SEA |
18.8 |
35 |
26.83 |
1. Tom Brady |
NE |
32 |
34.9 |
116.02 |
12. Jon Kitna |
DET |
17.6 |
34.6 |
17.64 |
4. Peyton Manning |
IND |
22.1 |
34.4 |
60.06 |
7. Eli Manning |
NYG |
17.6 |
32.9 |
11.02 |
15. Jay Cutler |
DEN |
18.6 |
32.8 |
5.29 |
17. Jason Campbell |
WAS |
15.6 |
32.1 |
11.11 |
20. Damon Huard |
KC |
13.9 |
32 |
1.99 |
3. Derek Anderson |
CLE |
24.3 |
32 |
52.1 |
8. Jeff Garcia |
TB |
16.9 |
31.6 |
8.44 |
22. Joey Harrington |
ATL |
12.5 |
31.4 |
3.58 |
42. Rex Grossman |
CHI |
10 |
31 |
N/A |
29. Jake Delhomme |
CAR |
22 |
30.7 |
N/A |
21. David Garrard |
JAC |
15.7 |
29.8 |
5.23 |
27. Trent Green |
MIA |
14.5 |
29.6 |
8.71 |
16. Chad Pennington |
NYJ |
15.7 |
29.6 |
13.48 |
6. Ben Roethlisberger |
PIT |
20.8 |
29.3 |
29.64 |
14. Philip Rivers |
SD |
17 |
29.1 |
16.97 |
19. Matt Schaub |
HOU |
13.3 |
28.6 |
0 |
41. Kelly Holcomb |
MIN |
11.2 |
28 |
N/A |
28. Vince Young |
TEN |
11.5 |
27.8 |
3.85 |
32. Alex Smith |
SF |
9.8 |
27.8 |
-9.77 |
23. Daunte Culpepper |
OAK |
15.9 |
27.6 |
0 |
46. Vinny Testaverde |
CAR |
9.5 |
27.5 |
N/a |
34. Tarvaris Jackson |
MIN |
11.4 |
27.3 |
-11.36 |
35. Josh McCown |
OAK |
15.1 |
25.7 |
N/A |
37. Trent Edwards |
BUF |
8.8 |
25 |
-8.84 |
36. Matt Leinart |
ARI |
8.9 |
24.6 |
-1.78 |
39. Trent Dilfer |
SF |
9.2 |
23.5 |
N/A |
38. Gus Frerotte |
STL |
9.5 |
22.5 |
0 |
33. Kyle Boller |
BAL |
7.9 |
20.7 |
-9.46 |
44. Kellen Clemens |
NYJ |
7.4 |
20.7 |
N/A |
40. David Carr |
CAR |
7 |
20.2 |
-8.76 |
25. Kurt Warner |
ARI |
12.4 |
19.5 |
20.76 |
31. Sage Rosenfels |
HOU |
13 |
19.3 |
N/A |
45. Kerry Collins |
TEN |
5.3 |
16.5 |
N/A |
48. Quinn Gray |
JAC |
4.2 |
15.3 |
N/A |
43. J.P. Losman |
BUF |
6.9 |
14.5 |
-6.88 |
49. Tim Rattay |
ARI |
6.3 |
13.5 |
N/A |
47. Byron Leftwich |
ATL |
4.5 |
12.3 |
N/A |
|
It may not be the personnel grouping of the run and shoot but based
on the number of attempts per game the Packers are throwing, June
Jones and his mentor—and current offensive coordinator at Hawaii,
Mouse Davis would be proud. Brett
Favre is the Packer offense. If they go deep into the playoffs,
it will have to do with this 3-time (and deservedly a 4th shot if
he gets them there?) NFL MVP carrying this offense on his back.
I’m not dissing the Green Bay defense, they’re an equal part of
the equation, but Favre notice I mentioned one offensive players
and a collection of 11 defensive players. You get the point. I have
Favre in three leagues, and now that Rod Marinelli has made it a
point to run the ball I’m not even thinking twice about leaving
Kitna on the bench in the two that he’s my “second” QB.
Look at Steve McNair near the top of this list? Too bad his average
points per game do not make him a reasonable fantasy starter.
Even I can’t say anything good about the veteran—now
I have to resort to making D.J. Nestrick mention something decent
about him in order to continue writing columns here—that,
and asking him if he’s seen Divine Brown recently.
Cleo Lemon
and Carson
Palmer are at least close to McNabb in this respect. They
are making something out of their chances, but I think Lemon and
McNabb are heading in opposite directions—especially with the
whispers Dolphins 2nd round pick has a shot to start after the
bye week. Palmer should improve because once Chris Henry returns,
he’ll make it impossible for opposing defenses to double cover
both Chad Johnson and T.J. Houshmandzadeh.
If you’re looking for an even balance of big plays and
frequent opportunities you have to move down to spots 8-15 on
each table. There you see Brady, Kitna, and Manning. Still, a
player like Roethlisberger who has a great ground attack supporting
him is making the most of fewer opportunities. This is probably
why his season seems so “quiet” to the casual observer.
As most Big Ben owners if they’ll trade him to you for a
#3 RB or #3 WR, and I bet you get a different story…
Philip
Rivers is a quarterback I wouldn’t mind acquiring through
a trade at this point of the season. I’m buying the immediate
added value Chris Chambers is bringing to the Chargers offense.
Name the last time San Diego had a true #1 receiver? I think Tony
Martin during the short-lived, Stan Humphries era of the mid-nineties
might be the last time.
Avg.
Number of Games per RB x Production |
Last Name |
First Name |
Year |
Team |
G |
GS |
Rush Tds |
Rec |
Rec Yd |
Rec Td |
Fpts |
Martin |
Tony |
1994 |
SD |
16 |
1 |
0 |
50 |
885 |
7 |
130.5 |
Martin |
Tony |
1995 |
SD |
16 |
16 |
0 |
90 |
1224 |
6 |
158.4 |
Martin |
Tony |
1996 |
SD |
16 |
16 |
0 |
85 |
1171 |
14 |
201.1 |
Martin |
Tony |
1997 |
SD |
16 |
16 |
0 |
63 |
904 |
6 |
126.4 |
|
Chambers is a very similar receiver to Martin—nearly as
fast and more acrobatic—and adding him to the combo of Gates
and LT makes them a much more dangerous team. I think they are
the clear favorite in the AFC West and provide a stern test for
any team in the playoffs. One player sometimes makes that big
of a difference. Randy Moss certainly does for New England. He
opens things up for Wes Welker in the slot, the running game,
and the improved scoring proficiency gives the defense an inherent
advantage to be aggressive. Chris Chambers to an extent does the
same thing for the Chargers. I think Rivers is in for a great
second half.
Running Backs
I examined four stats for runners: yards per carry, yards per
catch, yards per touch (the sum of both carry and catch) and touches
per game. Although Najeh Davenport, Jerious Norwood, Kevin Faulk,
and Justin Fargas have great yards per touch numbers, their touches
per game are in the single digits—about half of what this
should be for a fantasy owner to have more than a bye week use
for them. Still, any back on this list with decent yards per touch
is worth keeping as depth.
The real deal here is Adrian
Peterson. His 17 yards per catch is insanely high—for even
a wide receiver. But to me it’s his even more impressive 5.78
yards per carry, because he’s still getting nearly 20 touches
per game. This is a lot more than a likely perception due to the
fact coach Brad Childress had stubbornly kept Peterson as the
#2 RB and limited his touches in games where it seemed obvious
that the rookie should be getting the rock All Day.
Ronnie
Brown owners won’t like this chart very much. Their back was
tearing up fantasy football with 6.27 yards per touch on jackhammer
rate of 22.57 touches per game. Speaking of steady doses, look
at Brian
Westbrook. I so love how people said he’d never become a featured
back. The Eagle’s offensive MVP garners Marshall Faulk-like attempts
with 24.17 per game. Only Willie
Parker tops him in touches per game with a bit over 25 per
contest. Wilis McGahee has nearly the same amount of touches as
Westbrook, too. But neither of these AFC North backs is within
a yard and a half per touch of the Eagles stud.
Player |
TM |
Fpt/G |
ypcrry |
ypcth |
Ypt |
T/Gm |
33. Najeh Davenport |
PIT |
6.9 |
6.26 |
9.43 |
6.76 |
6.43 |
2. Adrian Peterson |
MIN |
18.4 |
5.78 |
17.00 |
6.67 |
19.86 |
34. Jerious Norwood |
ATL |
6.8 |
5.79 |
8.41 |
6.48 |
9.14 |
1. Ronnie Brown |
MIA |
18.4 |
5.06 |
9.97 |
6.27 |
22.57 |
46. Kevin Faulk |
NE |
4.4 |
4.68 |
8.64 |
6.23 |
7.00 |
38. Justin Fargas |
OAK |
5.9 |
5.74 |
9.75 |
6.23 |
9.43 |
13. Maurice Jones-Drew |
JAC |
11.8 |
5.29 |
9.78 |
6.14 |
13.57 |
4. Brian Westbrook |
PHI |
19.7 |
4.87 |
9.86 |
6.08 |
24.17 |
7. Marion Barber |
DAL |
13.9 |
5.75 |
7.39 |
6.04 |
14.43 |
45. Jesse Chatman |
MIA |
4.4 |
5.44 |
6.64 |
5.78 |
6.25 |
50. Correll Buckhalter |
PHI |
4.7 |
5.08 |
7.70 |
5.63 |
6.86 |
29. Brandon Jacobs |
NYG |
11.9 |
5.63 |
4.00 |
5.51 |
17.20 |
32. DeAngelo Williams |
CAR |
7.2 |
5.22 |
5.79 |
5.33 |
10.29 |
49. Jason Wright |
CLE |
4.8 |
4.19 |
9.70 |
5.23 |
7.57 |
42. Laurence Maroney |
NE |
7.9 |
4.84 |
18.5 |
5.20 |
15.20 |
43. Chris Brown |
TEN |
7.8 |
5.26 |
3.75 |
5.08 |
13.00 |
3. LaDainian Tomlinson |
SD |
17.8 |
4.44 |
8.12 |
5.02 |
23.57 |
12. LaMont Jordan |
OAK |
12.1 |
4.09 |
9.73 |
4.93 |
21.00 |
30. Kenton Keith |
IND |
8.3 |
4.78 |
6.11 |
4.93 |
11.57 |
5. Joseph Addai |
IND |
19.4 |
4.81 |
5.29 |
4.87 |
23.33 |
24. Travis Henry |
DEN |
11 |
4.61 |
10.4 |
4.85 |
20.67 |
27. Jamal Lewis |
CLE |
9.9 |
4.65 |
8.25 |
4.80 |
16.50 |
15. Derrick Ward |
NYG |
11.1 |
4.44 |
6.25 |
4.78 |
17.86 |
20. Kenny Watson |
CIN |
10.3 |
4.72 |
5.13 |
4.78 |
14.29 |
31. DeShawn Wynn |
GB |
8.6 |
4.12 |
8.11 |
4.74 |
9.67 |
28. Kevin Jones |
DET |
11.9 |
4.39 |
6.38 |
4.73 |
15.00 |
6. Willis McGahee |
BAL |
13.9 |
4.38 |
6.38 |
4.66 |
24.29 |
22. Earnest Graham |
TB |
8.4 |
4.02 |
6.79 |
4.65 |
13.25 |
8. Willie Parker |
PIT |
13.3 |
4.43 |
7.08 |
4.61 |
25.14 |
26. Sammy Morris |
NE |
10 |
4.52 |
5.83 |
4.60 |
15.17 |
35. Julius Jones |
DAL |
6.6 |
3.79 |
10.7 |
4.58 |
12.57 |
18. Frank Gore |
SF |
10.6 |
3.95 |
8.33 |
4.48 |
17.86 |
10. Clinton Portis |
WAS |
12.7 |
3.77 |
8.21 |
4.4 |
19.14 |
36. Fred Taylor |
JAC |
6.2 |
4.38 |
4.00 |
4.36 |
14.29 |
16. Reggie Bush |
NO |
11.1 |
3.77 |
5.44 |
4.29 |
19.86 |
40. Brian Leonard |
STL |
5.1 |
3.58 |
7.17 |
4.26 |
11.88 |
19. DeShaun Foster |
CAR |
10.3 |
4.02 |
5.92 |
4.21 |
18.43 |
9. Edgerrin James |
ARI |
13 |
3.88 |
9.71 |
4.13 |
23.29 |
23. Thomas Jones |
NYJ |
8.3 |
3.79 |
7.07 |
4.09 |
20.25 |
47. Reuben Droughns |
NYG |
4.2 |
4.08 |
4.00 |
4.08 |
4.88 |
44. Ahman Green |
HOU |
7.2 |
3.74 |
5.38 |
4.03 |
15.00 |
48. Rudi Johnson |
CIN |
8.4 |
2.98 |
11.50 |
3.96 |
17.5 |
39. Carnell "Cadillac" Williams
|
TB |
10.1 |
3.85 |
5.67 |
3.95 |
14.25 |
11. Marshawn Lynch |
BUF |
12.4 |
3.63 |
8.09 |
3.94 |
22.71 |
17. Larry Johnson |
KC |
11 |
3.64 |
5.33 |
3.92 |
23.71 |
41. Steven Jackson |
STL |
10 |
3.56 |
6.60 |
3.91 |
21.75 |
14. LenDale White |
TEN |
11.6 |
3.69 |
5.60 |
3.82 |
21.29 |
25. Shaun Alexander |
SEA |
9.1 |
3.41 |
5.00 |
3.53 |
20.86 |
21. Cedric Benson |
CHI |
8.6 |
3.13 |
7.43 |
3.50 |
20.38 |
37. Warrick Dunn |
ATL |
6.1 |
3.07 |
4.33 |
3.27 |
16.14 |
|
Now if you have to settle for consistent feedings and hope for
the best, Marshawn
Lynch, LenDale
White, Larry
Johnson, Steven Jackson, and Cedric
Benson will get you 20 touches per contest, but they aren’t
giving a huge return on investment. They are the fantasy football
equivalent of sinking money into a CD at the bank. I don’t know
about you, but I want a little more bang for my buck.
Edgerrin James is probably the best of these grinders. He’s
at least averaging over 4 yards per touch and he’s getting
the ball 23.29 times per game. He’s the quintessential,
Steady Freddy #2 RB in fantasy leagues right now. Place his fellow
alumni Portis and Gore on to this list as well. They are actually
producing more efficiently but getting 4-6 fewer touches per contest
than Edge. Reggie Bush is become more of a workhorse as well.
Unfortunately, James is the only one mentioned in this paragraph
who is playing to his draft value; the other three are performing
below expectations at this point. There is hope for all three
from a scheduling standpoint, so I’d stick with them.
The guys to watch on this list are LT and Maroney. Both are going
to benefit from the increased firepower of their passing attacks.
LT is obvious so nothing more needs to be explained about him.
As for Maroney I said it previously, and I say it again, if you
want a great candidate for an explosive stretch player at RB,
acquire Laurence Maroney. New England will continue to run the
ball more frequently as teams try to limit Moss and Welker. Maroney’s
big-play ability combined with more frequent touches is going
to spell a fantasy point bonanza for his owners.
The three most frustrating players on this list are Maurice Jones-Drew,
DeAngelo Williams, and Marion Barber III. All three have top-notch
yards per touch stats, and their touches per game stats are good
enough to use them. The problem is fantasy owners of these three
runners know that if they had just 6-8 additional touches per
game, they could be elite fantasy runners. It’s a heart-wrenching
situation to watch a good player go to waste.
Brandon Jacobs’ numbers are only going to get better. His
17 touches per game are deflated due to his injury. This guy is
going to make you happy to watch the Giants if you have him on
your roster down the stretch. There’s nothing like watching
a big back run through defenders carry after carry and your fantasy
total is changing like numbers on an adding machine. Jacobs and
Maroney are those two guys this year.
Jamal Lewis could sneak onto this list as well. His touches per
game stats should increase in the coming months and he’s
producing at a respectable rate. Although it may seem like a tough
move to make—trading one of the three backs I labeled as
frustrating (paired with another player) for Jacobs, Maroney,
or Lewis is a worthwhile risk. You might be able to get a less
savvy owner to bite on a deal for Lewis, Jacobs, or Maroney in
exchange for someone like Portis, Gore, James, and Bush—and
what makes his appealing is that you’ll have to ask for
a decent second player in return if you give up the four I just
mentioned. It’s a risk, but if you just aren’t the
type to sit tight and hold onto what you have then I’d suggest
this type of transaction.
Next week, we’ll look at receivers…
|