QB and RB Consistency Score Ranking
Splits
10/18/07
The “Gut Feeling” is often synonymous with a sense
of desperation resulting from a lack of preparation. The Gut Check
is a huge proponent of studying the numbers, but there’s
a point where one can place too much emphasis on the wrong information.
This can result in the undervaluing or overlooking a player’s
potential. Therefore, The Weekly Gut Check is devoted to examining
the frame of reference behind certain number-driven guidelines
that fantasy football owners use to make decisions.
Although The Weekly Gut Check doesn’t claim to be psychic,
he does believe that he can dispel certain numbers biases and
help you make the best choices for your team. We’ll keep
a running tally of The Weekly Gut Check’s insights. This
way you can gauge his views as something to seriously consider,
or at least seriously consider running the opposite way as fast
as you can!
At this point of the fantasy season, owners of squads with 3-3 or
2-4 records face serious personnel decisions regarding players who
are under-performing to projection. There are cases where these
disappointing totals have to do with the owner forecasting an unrealistic
season for their draft pick. But let’s talk about the cases
where the projections seemed reasonable, but the player hasn’t
performed up to par due to a temporary obstacle such as an early
season injury or difficult schedule. Although we pretty much know
which teams are really good (New England, Dallas, Indianapolis,
and Pittsburgh) and really bad (Cincinnati, Saint Louis, Miami,
and Atlanta), there are teams every year that start poorly and play
much better football as the year progresses. Some candidates for
his year are San Diego, New Orleans, Philadelphia, and Baltimore.
Conversely, Detroit, Cleveland, Houston, and Tennessee are teams
off to better than anticipated starts but in the back of our minds
we may expect them to see a drop off in performance.
As this change happens with teams, so it goes with players. This
means fantasy performance through week 6 may look like the fate
of one’s season is etched in stone, but it is not the case.
Anecdotal evidence suggests between week 6 and the end of the
season that there are a significant number of players (Second
Half Wonders) who far out perform their early production: Maurice
Jones-Drew, Shaun Alexander, and Joseph Addai were all examples
of runners who turned it up a notch. This week I will give you
a historical stats perspective of the shift in rankings between
week 6 and the end of the season for running backs and quarterbacks.
The rankings will be based Crank
Score rather than fantasy points per game, because I think
it makes more sense to look for the players who are consistently
playing better each week (Jones-Drew from 2006) and not just having
two huge games, then going quiet (Chad Johnson from 2006).
Movement of Top 20 RBs by Crank Score At
Season’s End Vs. Week 6
RB Movement |
RB |
2006 |
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|
1 |
0 |
-1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
|
2 |
1 |
27 |
2 |
-1 |
1 |
|
3 |
6 |
6 |
4 |
4 |
23 |
|
4 |
-2 |
-3 |
75 |
1 |
3 |
|
5 |
1 |
-2 |
-3 |
-3 |
-1 |
|
6 |
-1 |
-1 |
11 |
8 |
-1 |
|
7 |
1 |
-1 |
-6 |
2 |
13 |
|
8 |
18 |
9 |
73 |
3 |
-2 |
|
9 |
1 |
11 |
3 |
17 |
-7 |
|
10 |
-6 |
9 |
-5 |
-6 |
0 |
|
11 |
10 |
-1 |
2 |
-3 |
-3 |
|
12 |
-1 |
-5 |
20 |
-6 |
2 |
|
13 |
1 |
75 |
-3 |
15 |
4 |
|
14 |
2 |
-10 |
12 |
6 |
-3 |
|
15 |
0 |
12 |
32 |
14 |
4 |
|
16 |
-9 |
-5 |
12 |
-3 |
0 |
|
17 |
-3 |
-2 |
-6 |
-7 |
2 |
|
18 |
75 |
-2 |
2 |
-3 |
3 |
|
19 |
9 |
-6 |
-10 |
21 |
5 |
|
20 |
-3 |
-8 |
-14 |
2 |
9 |
Avg |
(+) |
25% |
35% |
30% |
30% |
15% |
28% |
(-) |
10% |
15% |
20% |
15% |
5% |
13% |
|
This chart shows the amount of movement up or down the running
back rankings between week 6 and the end of the season. The spots
highlighted in green show an improvement of at least 30% and the
red highlight demonstrates a decrease of at least the same amount.
Over a five-year period, 28% of the top-20 Crank Score RBs at
the end of the season consist of players who experienced a significant
upturn in production between weeks six and the end of the year.
In contrast, 13% of the backs will experience a significant drop
off in productivity. With these figures, one could reasonably
project that there will be five runners who go on a tear and two
runners who take a significant nosedive in 2007.
How do we know who these runners will be? One way to make a reasonable
guess is to examine the individual players who experienced this
significant movement in production to see if we can accurate profile
their situation, then determine which of this year’s group
of backs fit these profiles.
The first clear, profile category for backs has to do with injury.
The following backs in the past five years, demonstrated a huge
upturn in production because they either came back from injury
or replaced an injured starter:
2006: Shaun Alexander and Ladell Betts
2005: Larry Johnson, Clinton Portis, Samkon Gado, and Mike Anderson
2004: Larry Johnson and Julius Jones
2003: Marshall Faulk, Moe Williams, and Domanick Williams
That’s quite a list of players. In 2007, there are a few runners
who could experience an upswing in production due to injury. The
Buccaneers new acquisition, Michael
Bennett, has a very good chance of performing like a 2nd half
stud because he will get a chance to start for the first time
in a few years. Bennett has the speed and receiving skills to
do a decent poor man’s imitation of the Charlie Garner role in
Jon Gruden’s offense. Dominic
Rhodes might get a chance to give fantasy owners a boost if
Lamont Jordan’s back troubles continue to flare. Rhodes has the
skills to force Jordan into a supporting role if the current Oakland
starter isn’t fully healthy. Both Rhodes and Bennett are hot waiver
wire commodities at this time. Although much more speculative
in nature, Larry Johnson’s 400-carry season in 2006 continues
to make him a candidate ripe for injury in 2007. If this occurs,
the current depth chart has Louisville rookie, Kolby
Smith and the inimitable, Priest
Holmes. One of these two backs could turn your season around
if LJ doesn’t last the year.
There are also backs returning from early season woes that could
turn it up a notch. Brandon
Jacobs is probably the most likely candidate here. His week
one knee sprain sidelined him for a month and with the Giants
offense clicking, Jacobs could be in for a nice stretch run as
long as he can remain healthy. Derrick Ward should continue to
effectively spell Jacobs, but there is no question that New York
expects the former Auburn and Southern Illinois alumnus to take
the bulk of the carries. Steven
Jackson could be this year’s version of Shaun Alexander, because
once his groin tear heals, he could post some big games down the
stretch. The problem with this theory is how long do you have
to wait on Jackson and the Rams offensive line is a significant
step down from the Seahawk’s unit.
If
I were a betting man, Laurence
Maroney is the guy I’d hitch my second half wagon to; the
Pats starter should be back from his injury this week and with
Sammy Morris out for a month, Maroney is in a situation where
he’ll only have to share time with Kevin Faulk. The second-year
back rehabbed his shoulder during the off-season and New England
was very careful not to expose Maroney to additional risks of
re-injuring it. The time off actually gave the back’s shoulder
additional time to heal. With opposing defenses completely occupied
with the spectacular aerial attack, look for Maroney to see 7-man
fronts on a regular basis, which should mean some big games for
the former Golden Gopher.
Maurice
Jones-Drew and Reggie
Bush also fit into this category. Bush is two weeks into his
full-time role as the Saints featured back, and last week was
a significant improvement in production. If he can continue to
effectively replace Deuce McAllister, fantasy owners will see
a big improvement in his stats. He hasn’t been a scoring machine,
but I think as the Saints right the ship, Bush is due for some
huge fantasy weeks. His former cross-town rival, Jones-Drew, lit
it up last week after Fred Taylor re-aggravated a minor injury.
Don’t be surprised if the Jags lean on the second-year runner
a bit more than they have because Jones-Drew has been too dynamic
to keep off the field. He’s the best big-play threat they have.
Another category is rookie production. Let’s list the rookies
between 2002-2006 who were given the opportunity to perform as
starters around the fantasy season mid-point:
2006: Maurice Jones-Drew and Joseph Addai
2005: Samkon Gado (remember he was a rookie, too)
2004: Julius Jones
2003: Domanick Williams
2002: Clinton Portis
Adrian
Peterson and Marshawn
Lynch are already starting (or in Peterson’s case, producing
at a high level) for their squads. Is there a rookie runner who
could be primed to handle a greater share of the workload? The
answer most likely lies a mile above sea level. Selvin
Young, will likely get the chance to replace Travis Henry
and he’s done enough so far to earn the opportunity. Young is
one of those underachieving college backs who went to a big-time
program and injury/competition kept him from really showing his
stuff. Coach Shannahan and the Broncos are intimately familiar
with this story (Terrell Davis) and Young has an opportunity to
make the most of Henry’s misfortune.
On a side note, if you follow college football then Georgia runner,
Kregg Lumpkin is a player I would remember. He and Reggie Bush
were the most sought-after RB prospects of their prep class. My
UGA source—who works as a trainer for the team—tells me that the
Jets rookie Danny Ware was the most physically talented of the
recent UGA backs, Thomas Brown had the biggest heart, and Kregg
Lumpkin was the most all-around skilled at the position. He said
Brown had the best vision and hit the hole the hardest. If Lumpkin
can stay healthy as a pro, he will be a pleasant surprise for
some team’s fan base.
Moving on to quarterbacks, it’s important to note that over a
five-year period 42% of the top-10 Crank Score QBs changed from
week 6 to the end of the year.
QB Movement |
QB |
2006 |
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
2 |
-1 |
4 |
0 |
-1 |
14 |
|
3 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
|
4 |
8 |
2 |
-1 |
9 |
4 |
|
5 |
1 |
12 |
16 |
1 |
-2 |
|
6 |
68 |
69 |
3 |
10 |
-4 |
|
7 |
-2 |
15 |
0 |
68 |
-3 |
|
8 |
1 |
8 |
2 |
-3 |
6 |
|
9 |
6 |
2 |
7 |
18 |
0 |
|
10 |
21 |
2 |
-3 |
2 |
-3 |
|
11 |
9 |
7 |
8 |
10 |
38 |
|
12 |
2 |
-3 |
5 |
-3 |
-1 |
|
13 |
-1 |
7 |
4 |
9 |
-1 |
|
14 |
-6 |
25 |
61 |
40 |
4 |
|
15 |
-5 |
0 |
5 |
32 |
-7 |
|
16 |
7 |
-13 |
8 |
3 |
-6 |
|
17 |
58 |
-3 |
28 |
6 |
1 |
|
18 |
-15 |
-13 |
26 |
32 |
16 |
|
19 |
6 |
4 |
3 |
-5 |
55 |
|
20 |
-6 |
-14 |
-6 |
-5 |
56 |
Avg |
(+) |
40% |
35% |
35% |
50% |
30% |
38% |
(-) |
10% |
15% |
5% |
0% |
10% |
8% |
|
As with the RB chart, this chart shows the amount of movement
up or down the quarterback rankings between week 6 and the end
of the season. The spots highlighted in green show an improvement
of at least 30% and the red highlight demonstrates a decrease
of at least the same amount. Over a five-year period, 38% of the
top-20 Crank Score QBs at the end of the season consist of players
who experienced a significant upturn in production between weeks
six and the end of the year. In contrast, 8% of the quarterbacks
will experience a significant drop off in productivity. With these
figures, one could reasonably project that there will be nearly
eight QBs who go on a tear and nearly two passers who take a significant
nosedive in 2007.
In contrast to RBs, there is generally a smaller gap in production
between QBs in rankings, so I believe it is far more likely a
runner will help your team at this stage than acquiring a QB.
Of course, if your starting QB isn’t ranked in the top 12-15,
then you’ve got a problem to address.
Let’s see if the QBs fall into similar profile categories
as runners. And as is the case with backs, injury is a factor.
The following quarterbacks in the past five years, demonstrated
a huge upturn in production because they either came back from
injury or replaced an injured starter:
2006: Carson Palmer and Ben Roethlisberger
2005:
2004: Billy Volek and Tim Rattay
2003: Chad Pennington and Josh McCown
2002: Jeff Blake
Donovan
McNabb is the clear-cut, candidate to up his production in
the second half of the 2007 fantasy season after coming off an
injury. McNabb has had a couple of strong outings, but hasn’t
been the elite Crank Scorer as he was in previous seasons. I expect
this to change as he and his receiving corps continue to get on
the same page. I’ve pretty much learned that you never count out
McNabb if he’s healthy enough to suit up. Since this is the case,
you shouldn’t either.
Marc Bulger is coming off and injury that forced him to miss
a couple of weeks. In his place, the Rams had the displeasure
of starting my vision of Brett Favre gone wild, Gus
Frerotte. The journeyman probably has more “my friend went
to Hawaii and I’ll I got was this t-shirt,” gifts from opposing
defensive backs than any active QB in the NFL. Although the Rams
offense has looked horrible, look for St. Louis to make enough
adjustments that Bulger becomes a worthwhile starter down the
stretch (as long as Holt, Bennett, and McMichael are healthy).
Kurt Warner and David Carr are replacing injured quarterbacks,
then got hurt as well. Both may return this week. I was much higher
on Warner before he went down. Now I’m worried that he’ll
try to rush throws as he did during his injured thumb days at
the end of his stint in St. Louis and second gig with New York.
Fortunately, this is his non-throwing arm, so wouldn’t drop
him too fast unless there’s a better QB on your waiver wire.
Carr definitely isn’t that QB, but stranger things have
happened.
Rookie performers seldom do enough to warrant mentioning. The
two recent exceptions were Cutler and Roethilsberger (Young just
missed the top 20, but you should add him in there based on his
huge jump). The best three candidates to become viable rookie
starters this year are Trent
Edwards, John
Beck, and JaMarcus
Russell. Dick Jauron has already named Edwards the starter
this week despite the fact that if J.P. Losman is healthy enough
to give it a shot. As Edwards gains more confidence, and the Bills
coaching staff more confidence him Edwards, look for them to open
up the offense. Lee Evans should become a beneficiary if it happens.
Neither Beck nor Russell are slated to start, but Cleo Lemon does
not inspire me to think of Derek Anderson so I think Beck should
see time as the Dolphins go down the tubes. Beck is a natural
leader and a very smart signal caller, but with the loss of Chris
Chambers, Ted Ginn, Jr. will have to look amazing for Beck to
have any shot of producing as a rookie. I don’t think it’s likely.
Raiders sources have supposedly been wowed by Russell in practice,
but when was the last time anything about the team in Oakland
has wowed anyone? Granted, they are playing better, but last I
saw, Russell’s footwork was so bad in college that he’d look like
Johnny Unitas one play, Ryan Leaf the next. He’ll need more time.
One category unique to quarterbacks is the signal caller who
replaces an ineffective starter. Derek Anderson did this last
year (and most notably this year) as did Joey Harrington. But
neither were worthwhile starters. In fact, there were no significant
players who qualified as good stretch players who got the opportunity
due to this situation. Anderson seems to be the lone example.
This could mean Anderson is for real just from the fact that his
profile is so unique in the past five years. If for some reason
owners in your league are still slow to come around on this kid,
you should snatch him up.
There are examples of quarterbacks who had slow starts and strong
finishes. Jake Delhomme, Michael Vick, Aaron Brooks, Trent Green,
Drew Brees, Matt Hasselbeck, Jon Kitna, and Tom Brady are all
examples of player who overcame rough starts—sometimes in multiple
seasons. With this in mind, I’d recommend you stick with Drew
Brees. The Saints quarterback has performed too well in recent
seasons to believe his production will continue to fall off the
face of the earth.
Next week, I’ll provide results for receivers and tight
ends.
|