Second Reads and Route Adjustments
10/30/08
The “Gut Feeling” is often synonymous with a sense
of desperation resulting from a lack of preparation. The Gut Check
is a huge proponent of studying the numbers, but there’s
a point where one can place too much emphasis on the wrong information.
This can result in the undervaluing or overlooking a player’s
potential. Therefore, The Weekly Gut Check is devoted to examining
the frame of reference behind certain number-driven guidelines
that fantasy football owners use to make decisions.
Although The Weekly Gut Check doesn’t claim to be psychic,
he does believe that he can dispel certain numbers biases and
help you make the best choices for your team. We’ll keep
a running tally of The Weekly Gut Check’s insights. This
way you can gauge his views as something to seriously consider,
or at least seriously consider running the opposite way as fast
as you can!
The position with the most analyzable stats is wide receiver. The
primary route for most fantasy managers is to track receptions,
yards, and fantasy points per game average. Digging deeper generally
means accessing targets and yards per catch. Taking the analysis
a few steps further will actually help you more formally identify
the various ways a receiver functions in his offense. Understanding
his role will help you figure out which personnel adjustments at
the position may help or hurt your lineup as the second half of
the fantasy season takes shape.
The stats that reveal this information include target conversion
percentage (C%), targets per game (T/GM), and touchdown conversion
percentage (Td C%). These three pieces of information will be
combined with the typical receiving stats of value to reveal which
moves you should make at this fantasy position down the stretch.
Top 36: Targets/Game |
Player |
G |
T |
Rec |
Yds |
TD |
Fpts |
Fpts/G |
C% |
TdC% |
Yds/Rec |
T/GM |
11. B.
Marshall |
6 |
80 |
49 |
598 |
3 |
77.4 |
12.9 |
61% |
4% |
12.2 |
13.3 |
6. A.
Johnson |
7 |
83 |
56 |
772 |
2 |
89.2 |
12.7 |
67% |
2% |
13.8 |
11.9 |
22. D.
Bowe |
7 |
74 |
40 |
512 |
2 |
63.2 |
9 |
54% |
3% |
12.8 |
10.6 |
2. R.
White |
7 |
72 |
43 |
679 |
5 |
98.1 |
14 |
60% |
7% |
15.8 |
10.3 |
8. S.
Smith (CAR) |
6 |
59 |
33 |
613 |
4 |
84.7 |
14.1 |
56% |
7% |
18.6 |
9.8 |
3. L.
Fitzgerald |
7 |
68 |
43 |
661 |
5 |
96.1 |
13.7 |
63% |
7% |
15.4 |
9.7 |
30. W.
Welker |
7 |
67 |
49 |
466 |
1 |
54.5 |
7.8 |
73% |
1% |
9.5 |
9.6 |
17. T.J.
Housh. |
8 |
76 |
54 |
512 |
3 |
70.1 |
8.8 |
71% |
4% |
9.5 |
9.5 |
7. A.
Boldin |
5 |
47 |
36 |
429 |
7 |
87.9 |
17.6 |
77% |
15% |
11.9 |
9.4 |
12. R.
Wayne |
7 |
65 |
38 |
521 |
4 |
76.1 |
10.9 |
58% |
6% |
13.7 |
9.3 |
29. M.
Jones |
7 |
63 |
37 |
444 |
2 |
56.4 |
8.1 |
59% |
3% |
12 |
9 |
33. E.
Royal |
6 |
53 |
39 |
392 |
2 |
52.7 |
8.8 |
74% |
4% |
10.1 |
8.8 |
31. P.
Burress |
6 |
50 |
28 |
356 |
3 |
53.6 |
8.9 |
56% |
6% |
12.7 |
8.3 |
1. S.
Moss |
8 |
66 |
42 |
658 |
5 |
98.5 |
12.3 |
64% |
8% |
15.7 |
8.3 |
42. C.
Johnson |
7 |
57 |
32 |
312 |
2 |
43.2 |
5.4 |
56% |
4% |
9.8 |
8.1 |
14. L.
Coles |
7 |
56 |
37 |
433 |
5 |
74.2 |
10.6 |
66% |
9% |
11.7 |
8 |
4. G.
Jennings |
7 |
56 |
37 |
685 |
4 |
92.5 |
13.2 |
66% |
7% |
18.5 |
8 |
34. A.
Bryant |
8 |
64 |
38 |
452 |
1 |
51.2 |
6.4 |
59% |
2% |
11.9 |
8 |
24. D.
Jackson |
7 |
56 |
32 |
505 |
1 |
61.5 |
8.8 |
57% |
2% |
15.8 |
8 |
13. T.
Owens |
8 |
64 |
30 |
431 |
5 |
75.6 |
9.5 |
47% |
8% |
14.4 |
8 |
5. C.
Johnson |
7 |
55 |
29 |
588 |
5 |
89.3 |
12.8 |
53% |
9% |
20.3 |
7.9 |
35. B.
Edwards |
7 |
55 |
22 |
371 |
2 |
49.1 |
7 |
40% |
4% |
16.9 |
7.9 |
23. M.
Muhammad |
8 |
62 |
37 |
507 |
2 |
62.7 |
7.8 |
60% |
3% |
13.7 |
7.8 |
26. J.
Cotchery |
7 |
54 |
36 |
430 |
3 |
61 |
8.7 |
67% |
6% |
11.9 |
7.7 |
18. B.
Berrian |
7 |
54 |
28 |
517 |
3 |
70 |
10 |
52% |
6% |
18.5 |
7.7 |
32. S.
Breaston |
7 |
53 |
37 |
464 |
1 |
52.8 |
7.5 |
70% |
2% |
12.5 |
7.6 |
37. D.
Mason |
7 |
53 |
34 |
421 |
1 |
48.1 |
6.9 |
64% |
2% |
12.4 |
7.6 |
16. H.
Ward |
7 |
53 |
31 |
406 |
5 |
70.6 |
10.1 |
58% |
9% |
13.1 |
7.6 |
15. R.
Moss |
7 |
52 |
32 |
471 |
4 |
71.3 |
10.2 |
62% |
8% |
14.7 |
7.4 |
44. G.
Camarillo |
7 |
52 |
32 |
372 |
1 |
42.7 |
6.1 |
62% |
2% |
11.6 |
7.4 |
9. L.
Evans |
7 |
50 |
31 |
637 |
3 |
83.9 |
12 |
62% |
6% |
20.5 |
7.1 |
41. M.
Harrison |
7 |
50 |
23 |
270 |
3 |
45 |
6.4 |
46% |
6% |
11.7 |
7.1 |
25. L.
Moore |
8 |
55 |
38 |
431 |
3 |
61.1 |
7.6 |
69% |
5% |
11.3 |
6.9 |
43. S.
Holmes |
6 |
41 |
22 |
360 |
1 |
43 |
7.2 |
54% |
2% |
16.4 |
6.8 |
10. V.
Jackson |
8 |
52 |
30 |
538 |
4 |
80.9 |
10.1 |
58% |
8% |
17.9 |
6.5 |
20. K.
Walter |
7 |
44 |
29 |
363 |
5 |
67.3 |
9.6 |
66% |
11% |
12.5 |
6.3 |
|
The first stat we’ll review in detail is targets per game
(T/GM). The table to the left ranks the top 36 receivers according
to T/GM, but also displays the other pertinent stats that will be
discussed later.
It’s clear that the players with the most targets per game
don’t necessarily have the best fantasy points per game
average. Of the top twelve T/GM receivers, five of them average
less than 10 points per game. Three of these five receivers –
Dwayne Bowe, T.J. Houshmandzadeh, and Matt Jones – are arguably
the primary threat in offenses with line struggles to run the
ball and protect the passer. The Chiefs and Bengals both have
quarterback issues.
If you argue T.J. Houshmandzadeh isn’t the primary guy
in Cincinnati, then he also has something in common with the other
two receivers in the T/GM top twelve who are averaging less than
10 points per game. Houshmandzadeh, Eddie Royal, and Wes Welker
all serve as productive secondary options for their teams and
all three are underneath options for their quarterbacks –
averaging 10 yards or fewer per catch.
Of the twelve most targeted receivers, only three – Bowe,
Wayne, and Jones – have a conversion percentage below 60%.
This is a common sense stat: if you have reliable hands, your
quarterback will target you often.
Surprisingly, the lowest three converters on this list of 36
receivers are the venerable, Terrell Owens (47%), Marvin Harrison
(46%), and Braylon Edwards (40%). T.O. has the rep for inconsistent
hands, but Harrison and Edwards? Credit inconsistent play for
each offense to begin the season. Stick with Owens, who might
be a buy-low candidate relative to his preseason perception.
If the patchwork solution between Kellen Winslow and the Browns
holds up, Braylon Edwards could benefit. The attempts are there,
but the receptions aren’t. Marvin Harrison may have a strong
game or two for the rest of the year, but I wouldn’t count
on him returning to fantasy form unless the Colts find a situational
role for him where he can exploit his remaining skills in a new
way. I would think putting Harrison in the slot could be helpful,
but I’m not sure they have the personnel to replace Harrison’s
role on the outside to divert the focus of a starting corner.
Top 36: Target Conversion
Percentage |
Player |
G |
T |
Rec |
Yds |
TD |
Fpts |
Fpts/G |
C% |
TdC% |
Yds/Rec |
T/GM |
46. I.
Hilliard |
8 |
32 |
27 |
226 |
3 |
40.6 |
5.1 |
84% |
9% |
8.4 |
4 |
7. A.
Boldin |
5 |
47 |
36 |
429 |
7 |
87.9 |
17.6 |
77% |
15% |
11.9 |
9.4 |
33. E.
Royal |
6 |
53 |
39 |
392 |
2 |
52.7 |
8.8 |
74% |
4% |
10.1 |
8.8 |
30. W.
Welker |
7 |
67 |
49 |
466 |
1 |
54.5 |
7.8 |
73% |
1% |
9.5 |
9.6 |
47. C.
Stuckey |
7 |
26 |
19 |
225 |
3 |
40.6 |
5.8 |
73% |
12% |
11.8 |
3.7 |
38. A.
Randle El |
8 |
46 |
33 |
409 |
1 |
47.4 |
5.9 |
72% |
2% |
12.4 |
5.8 |
17. T.J.
Housh. |
8 |
76 |
54 |
512 |
3 |
70.1 |
8.8 |
71% |
4% |
9.5 |
9.5 |
32. S.
Breaston |
7 |
53 |
37 |
464 |
1 |
52.8 |
7.5 |
70% |
2% |
12.5 |
7.6 |
49. H.
Baskett |
7 |
26 |
18 |
253 |
2 |
37.3 |
5.3 |
69% |
8% |
14.1 |
3.7 |
25. L.
Moore |
8 |
55 |
38 |
431 |
3 |
61.1 |
7.6 |
69% |
5% |
11.3 |
6.9 |
6. A.
Johnson |
7 |
83 |
56 |
772 |
2 |
89.2 |
12.7 |
67% |
2% |
13.8 |
11.9 |
40. D.
Driver |
7 |
43 |
29 |
330 |
2 |
45.6 |
6.5 |
67% |
5% |
11.4 |
6.1 |
26. J.
Cotchery |
7 |
54 |
36 |
430 |
3 |
61 |
8.7 |
67% |
6% |
11.9 |
7.7 |
48. B.
Stokley |
6 |
36 |
24 |
262 |
2 |
38.2 |
6.4 |
67% |
6% |
10.9 |
6 |
50. R.
Meachem |
7 |
12 |
8 |
244 |
2 |
36.4 |
5.2 |
67% |
17% |
30.5 |
1.7 |
14. L.
Coles |
7 |
56 |
37 |
433 |
5 |
74.2 |
10.6 |
66% |
9% |
11.7 |
8 |
4. G.
Jennings |
7 |
56 |
37 |
685 |
4 |
92.5 |
13.2 |
66% |
7% |
18.5 |
8 |
20. K.
Walter |
7 |
44 |
29 |
363 |
5 |
67.3 |
9.6 |
66% |
11% |
12.5 |
6.3 |
37. D.
Mason |
7 |
53 |
34 |
421 |
1 |
48.1 |
6.9 |
64% |
2% |
12.4 |
7.6 |
1. S.
Moss |
8 |
66 |
42 |
658 |
5 |
98.5 |
12.3 |
64% |
8% |
15.7 |
8.3 |
28. D.
Avery |
6 |
33 |
21 |
347 |
2 |
56.5 |
9.4 |
64% |
6% |
16.5 |
5.5 |
3. L.
Fitzgerald |
7 |
68 |
43 |
661 |
5 |
96.1 |
13.7 |
63% |
7% |
15.4 |
9.7 |
9. L.
Evans |
7 |
50 |
31 |
637 |
3 |
83.9 |
12 |
62% |
6% |
20.5 |
7.1 |
15. R.
Moss |
7 |
52 |
32 |
471 |
4 |
71.3 |
10.2 |
62% |
8% |
14.7 |
7.4 |
44. G.
Camarillo |
7 |
52 |
32 |
372 |
1 |
42.7 |
6.1 |
62% |
2% |
11.6 |
7.4 |
11. B.
Marshall |
6 |
80 |
49 |
598 |
3 |
77.4 |
12.9 |
61% |
4% |
12.2 |
13.3 |
2. R.
White |
7 |
72 |
43 |
679 |
5 |
98.1 |
14 |
60% |
7% |
15.8 |
10.3 |
23. M.
Muhammad |
8 |
62 |
37 |
507 |
2 |
62.7 |
7.8 |
60% |
3% |
13.7 |
7.8 |
34. A.
Bryant |
8 |
64 |
38 |
452 |
1 |
51.2 |
6.4 |
59% |
2% |
11.9 |
8 |
29. M.
Jones |
7 |
63 |
37 |
444 |
2 |
56.4 |
8.1 |
59% |
3% |
12 |
9 |
16. H.
Ward |
7 |
53 |
31 |
406 |
5 |
70.6 |
10.1 |
58% |
9% |
13.1 |
7.6 |
12. R.
Wayne |
7 |
65 |
38 |
521 |
4 |
76.1 |
10.9 |
58% |
6% |
13.7 |
9.3 |
10. V.
Jackson |
8 |
52 |
30 |
538 |
4 |
80.9 |
10.1 |
58% |
8% |
17.9 |
6.5 |
24. D.
Jackson |
7 |
56 |
32 |
505 |
1 |
61.5 |
8.8 |
57% |
2% |
15.8 |
8 |
42. C.
Johnson |
7 |
57 |
32 |
312 |
2 |
43.2 |
5.4 |
56% |
4% |
9.8 |
8.1 |
39. P.
Crayton |
8 |
41 |
23 |
334 |
2 |
46.5 |
5.8 |
56% |
5% |
14.5 |
5.1 |
|
In contrast, let’s check out the top 36 receivers that
make the most of their opportunities. What you’re going
to find here are a lot of solid #3 -#4 receivers or bye week options.
Only Anquan Boldin and Andre Johnson are double-digit fantasy
point producers and in the top twelve in terms of converting targets,
which should further underscore how good both are playing right
now.
You may not get much out of Ike Hilliard, Antwaan Randle El,
Chansi Stuckey, or Hank Baskett, but if your desperate for a receiver
these guys will at least give you something most weeks.
Wes Welker
is no longer “sneaky good,” but Lance
Moore, Steve
Breaston, and Eddie
Royal have the quarterback and surrounding options to give
you solid production without the marquee name. Plus, Royal and
Welker get enough targets each game to be productive options.
Houshmandzadeh and Breaston’s stats indicate the same, but quarterback
issues and the return to slot receiver status (respectively) lead
me to believe they’ve already peaked.
It’s obvious from this table that production and the highest
target conversion don’t always go hand in hand. Santana
Moss, Greg Jennings, Roddy White, and Larry Fitzgerald are all
in the middle to closer to the bottom of the pack I this category.
When you get your nose out of the stat column and watch a ballgame
you know these players are often targeted in situations with a
high degree of difficulty. Therefore, the conversion may not be
among the highest on the list, but they continue to get fed the
ball enough to produce among the best in the game.
There is a player with intriguing numbers that we should discuss.
Robert Meachem is averaging fewer than two targets per game, but
he’s converting enough to earn over five points per game.
When you see he’s averaging over 30 yards per catch, you
realize he’s a player to watch for the future but not likely
this season. A lot of owners are up and own on Meachem because
his production is high for a player with such limited looks. Personally,
I like what Meachem has done by working with David Patteon to
learn what’s needd to become a true professional. He’s
a long-term “buy” candidate in dynasty leagues as
long as he continues to exhibit this type of behavior.
Top 36: Touchdown
Conversion Percentage |
Player |
G |
T |
Rec |
Yds |
TD |
Fpts |
Fpts/G |
C% |
TdC% |
Yds/Rec |
T/GM |
50. R.
Meachem |
7 |
12 |
8 |
244 |
2 |
36.4 |
5.2 |
67% |
17% |
30.5 |
1.7 |
45. M.
Austin |
7 |
18 |
10 |
229 |
3 |
40.9 |
5.8 |
56% |
17% |
22.9 |
2.6 |
27. C.
Chambers |
6 |
33 |
16 |
273 |
5 |
57.4 |
9.6 |
48% |
15% |
17.1 |
5.5 |
7. A.
Boldin |
5 |
47 |
36 |
429 |
7 |
87.9 |
17.6 |
77% |
15% |
11.9 |
9.4 |
47. C.
Stuckey |
7 |
26 |
19 |
225 |
3 |
40.6 |
5.8 |
73% |
12% |
11.8 |
3.7 |
20. K.
Walter |
7 |
44 |
29 |
363 |
5 |
67.3 |
9.6 |
66% |
11% |
12.5 |
6.3 |
36. N.
Washington |
7 |
31 |
16 |
290 |
3 |
48.4 |
6.9 |
52% |
10% |
18.1 |
4.4 |
16. H.
Ward |
7 |
53 |
31 |
406 |
5 |
70.6 |
10.1 |
58% |
9% |
13.1 |
7.6 |
46. I.
Hilliard |
8 |
32 |
27 |
226 |
3 |
40.6 |
5.1 |
84% |
9% |
8.4 |
4 |
5. C.
Johnson |
7 |
55 |
29 |
588 |
5 |
89.3 |
12.8 |
53% |
9% |
20.3 |
7.9 |
21. I.
Bruce |
8 |
44 |
23 |
399 |
4 |
63.9 |
8 |
52% |
9% |
17.3 |
5.5 |
14. L.
Coles |
7 |
56 |
37 |
433 |
5 |
74.2 |
10.6 |
66% |
9% |
11.7 |
8 |
19. D.
Henderson |
7 |
34 |
18 |
499 |
3 |
68.6 |
8.6 |
53% |
9% |
27.7 |
4.9 |
13. T.
Owens |
8 |
64 |
30 |
431 |
5 |
75.6 |
9.5 |
47% |
8% |
14.4 |
8 |
49. H.
Baskett |
7 |
26 |
18 |
253 |
2 |
37.3 |
5.3 |
69% |
8% |
14.1 |
3.7 |
15. R.
Moss |
7 |
52 |
32 |
471 |
4 |
71.3 |
10.2 |
62% |
8% |
14.7 |
7.4 |
10. V.
Jackson |
8 |
52 |
30 |
538 |
4 |
80.9 |
10.1 |
58% |
8% |
17.9 |
6.5 |
1. S.
Moss |
8 |
66 |
42 |
658 |
5 |
98.5 |
12.3 |
64% |
8% |
15.7 |
8.3 |
3. L.
Fitzgerald |
7 |
68 |
43 |
661 |
5 |
96.1 |
13.7 |
63% |
7% |
15.4 |
9.7 |
4. G.
Jennings |
7 |
56 |
37 |
685 |
4 |
92.5 |
13.2 |
66% |
7% |
18.5 |
8 |
2. R.
White |
7 |
72 |
43 |
679 |
5 |
98.1 |
14 |
60% |
7% |
15.8 |
10.3 |
8. S.
Smith |
6 |
59 |
33 |
613 |
4 |
84.7 |
14.1 |
56% |
7% |
18.6 |
9.8 |
12. R.
Wayne |
7 |
65 |
38 |
521 |
4 |
76.1 |
10.9 |
58% |
6% |
13.7 |
9.3 |
28. D.
Avery |
6 |
33 |
21 |
347 |
2 |
56.5 |
9.4 |
64% |
6% |
16.5 |
5.5 |
9. L.
Evans |
7 |
50 |
31 |
637 |
3 |
83.9 |
12 |
62% |
6% |
20.5 |
7.1 |
31. P.
Burress |
6 |
50 |
28 |
356 |
3 |
53.6 |
8.9 |
56% |
6% |
12.7 |
8.3 |
41. M.
Harrison |
7 |
50 |
23 |
270 |
3 |
45 |
6.4 |
46% |
6% |
11.7 |
7.1 |
26. J.
Cotchery |
7 |
54 |
36 |
430 |
3 |
61 |
8.7 |
67% |
6% |
11.9 |
7.7 |
48. B.
Stokley |
6 |
36 |
24 |
262 |
2 |
38.2 |
6.4 |
67% |
6% |
10.9 |
6 |
18. B.
Berrian |
7 |
54 |
28 |
517 |
3 |
70 |
10 |
52% |
6% |
18.5 |
7.7 |
25. L.
Moore |
8 |
55 |
38 |
431 |
3 |
61.1 |
7.6 |
69% |
5% |
11.3 |
6.9 |
39. P.
Crayton |
8 |
41 |
23 |
334 |
2 |
46.5 |
5.8 |
56% |
5% |
14.5 |
5.1 |
40. D.
Driver |
7 |
43 |
29 |
330 |
2 |
45.6 |
6.5 |
67% |
5% |
11.4 |
6.1 |
17. T.J.
Housh. |
8 |
76 |
54 |
512 |
3 |
70.1 |
8.8 |
71% |
4% |
9.5 |
9.5 |
33. E.
Royal |
6 |
53 |
39 |
392 |
2 |
52.7 |
8.8 |
74% |
4% |
10.1 |
8.8 |
11. B.
Marshall |
6 |
80 |
49 |
598 |
3 |
77.4 |
12.9 |
61% |
4% |
12.2 |
13.3 |
|
Meachem also headlines the list of players who make the most
of their catches – by reaching the end zone on 17% of his
attempts. Miles Austin is another player with promise for the
future. But let’s look at the players who will help you
now. The only guy that really makes the most out of less than
favorable circumstances (limited looks, poor QB situation, or
lack of surrounding talent) is Calvin Johnson. If Daunte Culpepper
signs with Detroit and has anything left, look out. The fact Johnson
is on pace for 1100 yards and 10 scores with the Lions as they
are is impressive enough – and by the way, he’s out-producing
Randy Moss in worse circumstances than Moss has…
Anquan Boldin jumps off this table with an impressive 15% of
his targets resulting in touchdowns. Because of the presence of
Larry Fitzgerald and Steve Breaston, Boldin draws single coverage
in situations where most receivers of his skill set are bracketed
by the secondary. He has the trifecta of stats we’re looking
for here: high targets, high conversion of targets, and high conversion
of targets in to scores. Add that up and you have a receiver scoring
17.6 points per game. As a fan of Donovan McNabb, it’s a
shame Boldin didn’t get his preseason wish, but the receiver
is playing true to his word and helping the Cardinals contend.
Chris Chambers’ targets and target conversion is mediocre
for a starter, but when he gets his hands on a ball, he’s
scoring nearly once every three catches. But if you want a lesser
known guy that is just as productive, but more efficient, target
Kevin Walter as a viable starter in three-receiver lineups. If
you are trying to negotiate a deal where you can’t offer
a lot in return Walter might be a player you can sneak off with.
So the next logical thing to do is put it all together and see
which players have the best combined numbers that reflect high
opportunity, high efficiency, and high production rolled into
one. I decided the criteria would be at least:
- 60% conversion of targets
- 7 fantasy points per game
- 6 targets per game.
The results aren’t the best fantasy producers, but it gives
a cross section of players you can rely upon to get consistent
opportunities and make something of them week in and week out.
Some of these players are superstars, others are solid #2 fantasy
starters, and still others are lesser-regarded bye week options.
High Opportunity,
High Efficiency, and High Production |
Player |
G |
T |
Rec |
Yds |
TD |
Fpts |
Fpts/G |
C% |
TdC% |
Yds/Rec |
T/GM |
7. A.
Boldin |
5 |
47 |
36 |
429 |
7 |
87.9 |
17.6 |
77% |
15% |
11.9 |
9.4 |
2. R.
White |
7 |
72 |
43 |
679 |
5 |
98.1 |
14 |
60% |
7% |
15.8 |
10.3 |
3. L.
Fitzgerald |
7 |
68 |
43 |
661 |
5 |
96.1 |
13.7 |
63% |
7% |
15.4 |
9.7 |
4. G.
Jennings |
7 |
56 |
37 |
685 |
4 |
92.5 |
13.2 |
66% |
7% |
18.5 |
8 |
11. B.
Marshall |
6 |
80 |
49 |
598 |
3 |
77.4 |
12.9 |
61% |
4% |
12.2 |
13.3 |
6. A.
Johnson |
7 |
83 |
56 |
772 |
2 |
89.2 |
12.7 |
67% |
2% |
13.8 |
11.9 |
1. S.
Moss |
8 |
66 |
42 |
658 |
5 |
98.5 |
12.3 |
64% |
8% |
15.7 |
8.3 |
14. L.
Coles |
7 |
56 |
37 |
433 |
5 |
74.2 |
10.6 |
66% |
9% |
11.7 |
8 |
17. T.J.
Housh. |
8 |
76 |
54 |
512 |
3 |
70.1 |
8.8 |
71% |
4% |
9.5 |
9.5 |
33. E.
Royal |
6 |
53 |
39 |
392 |
2 |
52.7 |
8.8 |
74% |
4% |
10.1 |
8.8 |
26. J.
Cotchery |
7 |
54 |
36 |
430 |
3 |
61 |
8.7 |
67% |
6% |
11.9 |
7.7 |
30. W.
Welker |
7 |
67 |
49 |
466 |
1 |
54.5 |
7.8 |
73% |
1% |
9.5 |
9.6 |
23. M.
Muhammad |
8 |
62 |
37 |
507 |
2 |
62.7 |
7.8 |
60% |
3% |
13.7 |
7.8 |
32. S.
Breaston |
7 |
53 |
37 |
464 |
1 |
52.8 |
7.5 |
70% |
2% |
12.5 |
7.6 |
37. D.
Mason |
7 |
53 |
34 |
421 |
1 |
48.1 |
6.9 |
64% |
2% |
12.4 |
7.6 |
15. R.
Moss |
7 |
52 |
32 |
471 |
4 |
71.3 |
10.2 |
62% |
8% |
14.7 |
7.4 |
9. L.
Evans |
7 |
50 |
31 |
637 |
3 |
83.9 |
12 |
62% |
6% |
20.5 |
7.1 |
25. L.
Moore |
8 |
55 |
38 |
431 |
3 |
61.1 |
7.6 |
69% |
5% |
11.3 |
6.9 |
20. K.
Walter |
7 |
44 |
29 |
363 |
5 |
67.3 |
9.6 |
66% |
11% |
12.5 |
6.3 |
28. D.
Avery |
6 |
33 |
21 |
347 |
2 |
56.5 |
9.4 |
64% |
6% |
16.5 |
5.5 |
|
The first seven receivers on this list are about as good as you
can get in fantasy football. You can count on at least two targets
per quarter in every game and no less than 12 fantasy points per
game. And there’s no one way these receivers achieve this
production. Boldin has been a redzone monster that is used in
the middle of the defense where he can make the tough grab or
run through a secondary. In contrast, Greg Jennings is performing
like the prototypical big play threat. Much like Derrick Mason
in his prime, Jennings skill at getting behind a defensive back
has far less to do with raw speed.
Then you have Brandon Marshall, Roddy White, and Andre Johnson
who must have some dirt on their quarterbacks because they are
getting targeted at least 10 times a week. The truth about this
trio is they have the size and toughness to go over the middle
and the speed to take a short pass a long way. None of their teams
have a strong defense and the quarterbacks are young and have
these receivers as favorites to rely upon – maybe even a
little too much for the good of the team, but with no complaints
from their fantasy owners.
There are also a fair share of tandems on this list: Boldin and
Fitzgerald, Coles and Cotchery, Marshall and Royal, Welker and
Moss, and Johnson and Walter. By the end of the year, I wouldn’t
be surprised if Steve
Smith and Muhsin
Muhammad join the list by season’s end. Interestingly enough,
Marshall and Johnson only appear to hog all the looks when in
fact they don’t at all – it just underscores how much their teams
throw the football.
Looking for a trio of players that are as safe a bet as you can
get not to get shut out? T.J. Houshmandzadeh, Eddie Royal, and
Wes Welker may not give you many big days, but 8-9 points per
game, and catching nearly 70% of the 9-10 targets they get per
game, these are valuable depth in non-ppr leagues and viable starters
in ppr leagues.
Lee Evans and Randy Moss are safe bets as big play artists. They
are getting over seven looks per game and converting those looks
over 60% of the time with double-digit fantasy points scored per
game. It appears they’ve gotten in sync with their quarterbacks.
Rising and Falling
A fast-rising guy is rookie Donnie
Avery. Although he’s only getting 5.5 targets per game, if
you calculate this number based on games started, he’s getting
far more looks now that he’s in the lineup. Marc Bulger is a terrific
quarterback, what holds him back is protection up front. Bulger
had no problem transitioning from Isaac Bruce to Kevin Curtis
a few years back. Now he has no problem getting the ball to Avery
more often than Holt.
Kevin Walter is on the rise, because opposing teams have to give
some respect to the Texans’ ground game with rookie Steve
Slaton. They run the ball just enough and rely so heavily on Andre
Johnson, that Walter will continue to earn easier opportunities
to cash in.
Steve Breaston
and Lance
Moore are players I believe will see a slip in production
because of the return of Anquan Boldin and Marques Colston, respectively.
Both have demonstrated they have the skills to be more than situational
receivers, but they will likely return to those roles for as long
as these primary guys remain healthy.
|