Playoff Consistency
12/16/04
The “Gut Feeling” is often synonymous with a sense
of desperation resulting from a lack of preparation. The Gut Check
is a huge proponent of studying the numbers, but there’s
a point where one can place too much emphasis on the wrong information.
This can result in the undervaluing or overlooking a player’s
potential. Therefore, The Weekly Gut Check is devoted to examining
the frame of reference behind certain number-driven guidelines
that fantasy football owners use to make decisions.
Although The Weekly Gut Check doesn’t claim to be psychic,
he does believe that he can dispel certain numbers biases and
help you make the best choices for your team. We’ll keep
a running tally of The Weekly Gut Check’s insights. This
way you can gauge his views as something to seriously consider,
or at least seriously consider running the opposite way as fast
as you can!
This week The Gut Check tackles the subject of consistent performers
during weeks 14-16. Yours Truly queried the average fantasy points
and consistency rating of players according to their position
between the years of 2001-2003. The hope is to determine the following
for the biggest fantasy weeks of the season:
- Historical "plays."
- Underrated "plays."
- "Plays" to avoid when possible.
By no means does The Gut Check view this as gospel, but it at
least provides fantasy owners a statistical and historical resource
to help with difficult lineup decisions from an angle different
from that just of advantageous scheduling. If we only used scheduling
as a factor Carson Palmer and T.J. Houshmanzadeh could not have
been seen as good plays in recent weeks versus Baltimore, New
England, or this weekend against the Bills.
Starting with Quarterbacks, here are the active signal callers
and their consistency level from 2001-2003:
QB Consistency |
Last |
First |
G |
Avg Of FF Pts |
Subpar |
Elite |
#1 QB |
#2 QB |
Volek |
Billy |
1 |
29.15 |
0.00% |
100.00% |
100.00% |
100.00% |
Culpepper |
Daunte |
6 |
25.15 |
0.00% |
50.00% |
66.67% |
100.00% |
Green |
Trent |
9 |
21.59 |
22.22% |
33.33% |
55.56% |
77.78% |
McNabb |
Donovan |
6 |
21.49 |
33.33% |
33.33% |
66.67% |
66.67% |
McNair |
Steve |
8 |
21.41 |
25.00% |
25.00% |
75.00% |
75.00% |
Manning |
Peyton |
9 |
21.25 |
44.44% |
33.33% |
55.56% |
55.56% |
Brooks |
Aaron |
9 |
20.84 |
44.44% |
33.33% |
55.56% |
55.56% |
Vick |
Michael |
7 |
19.72 |
28.57% |
28.57% |
57.14% |
71.43% |
Favre |
Brett |
9 |
19.01 |
44.44% |
22.22% |
55.56% |
55.56% |
McCown |
Joshua |
3 |
18.33 |
33.33% |
0.00% |
66.67% |
66.67% |
Ramsey |
Patrick |
3 |
18.18 |
33.33% |
0.00% |
33.33% |
66.67% |
Plummer |
Jake |
9 |
18.13 |
33.33% |
11.11% |
33.33% |
66.67% |
Feeley |
A.J. |
3 |
17.95 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
33.33% |
100.00% |
Testaverde |
Vinny |
3 |
17.47 |
33.33% |
0.00% |
33.33% |
66.67% |
Collins |
Kerry |
7 |
17.21 |
42.86% |
14.29% |
42.86% |
57.14% |
Brees |
Drew |
5 |
16.88 |
60.00% |
20.00% |
40.00% |
40.00% |
Kitna |
Jon |
9 |
16.85 |
55.56% |
22.22% |
33.33% |
44.44% |
Pennington |
Chad |
6 |
16.32 |
50.00% |
33.33% |
33.33% |
50.00% |
Hasselbeck |
Matt |
8 |
15.9 |
62.50% |
12.50% |
37.50% |
37.50% |
Bulger |
Marc |
5 |
15.88 |
40.00% |
0.00% |
60.00% |
60.00% |
Leftwich |
Byron |
3 |
15.25 |
66.67% |
0.00% |
33.33% |
33.33% |
Griese |
Brian |
4 |
14.49 |
25.00% |
0.00% |
25.00% |
75.00% |
Delhomme |
Jake |
4 |
13.9 |
75.00% |
0.00% |
25.00% |
25.00% |
Brady |
Tom |
8 |
13.56 |
75.00% |
0.00% |
12.50% |
25.00% |
Bledsoe |
Drew |
6 |
11.68 |
83.33% |
16.67% |
16.67% |
16.67% |
Harrington |
Joey |
4 |
10.68 |
100.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
Carr |
David |
4 |
9.96 |
75.00% |
0.00% |
25.00% |
25.00% |
|
It's clear that the amount of games sampled
in these calculations plays a large part in the analysis of the
data. For instance, Billy Volek is the top player, but we only
have one game to view between 2001-2003. Yet based on his performances
this year, it's clear that Volek is a good find for the stretch
runas evidenced against K.C.
Historically speaking, the most consistent producers appear to
be Culpepper, McNabb, Green, and McNair. This shouldn't change
for Culpepper as the Vikings have a healthy Moss back in the lineup
and are once again fighting off a late season collapse. McNabb
could be a dicey play in week 16 if the Eagles technically wrap
up home field advantage next weekendmeaning McNabb is at
least a good play in week 15. Trent Green is in the spoiler role,
but it's worth noting the Chiefs are still mathematically alive
for a wildcard and with Holmes out, the game will be placed in
Green's hands more than ever. McNair might have a nice game if
he isn't shut down for the yearbut with all the retirement
talk and Jeff Fisher publicly stating that McNair needs an off
season without a major injurydon't expect the Titan's on-field
leader to return in 2004.
Jon Kitna, Drew Brees, Byron Leftwich, and Jake Delhomme are
all underrated plays. Their stats don't look good, but this is
where one should consider their previous or current season. All
four players have improved their play during this 18-24 month
period and are worthwhile options. The Gut Check likes Leftwich
the most out of this group, because the match ups with Green Bay
and Houston in consecutive weeks are prime for throwing the ball
and Yours Truly has seen signs of life from rookie WR Reggie Williams.
Williams had a statistically sound game against Chicago, but it
was his play against Pittsburgh that really demonstrated he's
beginning to turn the corner. The Gut Check observed a receiver
that appeared more comfortable with the speed of the game and
was reacting more instinctively upon his athletic ability rather
than consumed in thought about his role. Look for Williams to
have at least one big game down the stretch and at the very least,
open things up for Leftwich.
Tom Brady and Chad Pennington are two players The Gut Check would
recommend shying away from if at all possible. Both are excellent
players and generally solid starts, but the statistics may have
a correlation to the fact that both teams tend to have late season
home games in bad weather. This year the trend continues
A list of the more prominent RBs further illustrates that one
should heavily consider the context of the player's current season
performance when evaluating these stats:
RB Consistency |
Last |
First |
G |
Avg Of FF Pts |
Subpar |
Elite |
RB #1 |
RB #2 |
RB #3 |
RB #4 |
Portis |
Clinton |
5 |
30.12 |
0.00% |
60.00% |
60.00% |
100.00% |
100.00% |
100.00% |
Lewis |
Jamal |
6 |
21.18 |
16.67% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
66.67% |
83.33% |
83.33% |
Tomlinson |
LaDainian |
9 |
18.89 |
11.11% |
33.33% |
77.78% |
77.78% |
88.89% |
88.89% |
Smith |
Onterrio |
3 |
18.7 |
33.33% |
33.33% |
66.67% |
66.67% |
66.67% |
66.67% |
Faulk |
Marshall |
9 |
18.26 |
33.33% |
33.33% |
66.67% |
66.67% |
66.67% |
66.67% |
Alexander |
Shaun |
9 |
17.71 |
11.11% |
44.44% |
55.56% |
77.78% |
77.78% |
88.89% |
Taylor |
Fred |
6 |
15.87 |
16.67% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
66.67% |
83.33% |
Martin |
Curtis |
9 |
14.28 |
0.00% |
11.11% |
44.44% |
55.56% |
100.00% |
100.00% |
Green |
Ahman |
8 |
14.18 |
12.50% |
12.50% |
62.50% |
75.00% |
87.50% |
87.50% |
Barlow |
Kevan |
8 |
14.19 |
50.00% |
37.50% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
Green |
William |
3 |
13.83 |
33.33% |
33.33% |
66.67% |
66.67% |
66.67% |
66.67% |
Barber |
Tiki |
9 |
13.48 |
22.22% |
0.00% |
55.56% |
66.67% |
77.78% |
77.78% |
Thomas |
Anthony |
6 |
12.97 |
50.00% |
33.33% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
Dunn |
Warrick |
5 |
12.58 |
40.00% |
20.00% |
60.00% |
60.00% |
60.00% |
60.00% |
Staley |
Duce |
9 |
12.51 |
22.22% |
11.11% |
55.56% |
55.56% |
66.67% |
77.78% |
Bettis |
Jerome |
6 |
12.45 |
50.00% |
16.67% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
Rhodes |
Dominic |
6 |
12.23 |
50.00% |
33.33% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
George |
Eddie |
9 |
11.94 |
55.56% |
22.22% |
33.33% |
44.44% |
44.44% |
44.44% |
Bryson |
Shawn |
6 |
11.62 |
50.00% |
16.67% |
33.33% |
33.33% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
McAllister |
Deuce |
9 |
11.37 |
33.33% |
11.11% |
33.33% |
44.44% |
55.56% |
66.67% |
Smith |
Antowain |
8 |
10.93 |
37.50% |
12.50% |
12.50% |
37.50% |
50.00% |
62.50% |
James |
Edgerrin |
6 |
10.57 |
33.33% |
16.67% |
16.67% |
33.33% |
50.00% |
66.67% |
Westbrook |
Brian |
5 |
9.68 |
60.00% |
20.00% |
20.00% |
40.00% |
40.00% |
40.00% |
Johnson |
Rudi |
4 |
9.65 |
75.00% |
25.00% |
25.00% |
25.00% |
25.00% |
25.00% |
Dillon |
Corey |
9 |
9.54 |
55.56% |
11.11% |
33.33% |
33.33% |
33.33% |
44.44% |
Droughns |
Reuben |
1 |
9.2 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
100.00% |
Jones |
Thomas |
6 |
9.07 |
50.00% |
16.67% |
16.67% |
16.67% |
33.33% |
50.00% |
Davis |
Domanick |
2 |
8.9 |
50.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
Bennett |
Michael |
8 |
7.88 |
50.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
12.50% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
Pittman |
Michael |
9 |
7.77 |
55.56% |
0.00% |
11.11% |
33.33% |
44.44% |
44.44% |
Smith |
Emmitt |
9 |
7.71 |
66.67% |
0.00% |
22.22% |
33.33% |
33.33% |
33.33% |
Suggs |
Lee |
2 |
4.9 |
100.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
Blaylock |
Derrick |
5 |
4.66 |
80.00% |
0.00% |
20.00% |
20.00% |
20.00% |
20.00% |
Williams |
Moe |
9 |
4.32 |
100.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
Brown |
Chris |
3 |
3.9 |
66.67% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
33.33% |
|
Corey Dillon, Domanick Davis, Edgerrin James, and Brian Westbrook
are excellent examples of players with poor historical stats during
the fantasy playoffs that are performing much better in 2004.
Dillon has found a team with a balanced attack, a decent defense,
and a coaching staff that exploits his strengths. Davis has been
banged up but finally looks healthy and is producing as such.
James may wind up the shakiest start due to a schedule that includes
San Diego and Baltimore, but The Gut Check believes a now-healthy
James can put up big stats on any defense. Westbrook? By now,
you know how Yours Truly views Westbrookhis last five games
are definitely an illustration of what he can do for a fantasy
team when healthy and used properlysuddenly The Gut Check
isn't the only one that is talking about Westbrook as a possible
elite RB of the future.
Fred Taylor is a player that historically has some nice games
down the stretch although the numbers state he's more of a 50/50
shot. It's worth noting that like James and Davis, Taylor is now
healthy (AFC South coincidence here?) and is running with the
type of authority and quickness that looks like he could break
a long one on any given play. Green Bay and Houston are excellent
candidates to suffer these consequences. Add Ladanian Tomlinson
to this list of early-injured-but-now-healed running backs. It's
amazing to think that LT had a mid-season swoon but still consistently
reached the end zone in most of his contests.
Shy away from Deuce McCallister, and Rudi Johnson at all possible.
McCallister and Johnson have difficult match ups and haven't displayed
a historical level of consistency. In addition, both teams are
more apt to throw the ball due to their poor defensive play and
developing passing games down the stretch.
Onterrio Smith should be a nice play. He's most effective indoors
and he faces Detroit and Green Bay on turf. With Randy Moss proving
last week that he's really back to form, defenses will be forced
to take him seriously. Remember what Mewelde Moore did with Moss
in the backfield? Moore is a good player, but Smith is the best
runner the Vikings have. If you want a preview of the possibilities,
just look at Smith's stats from last year down the stretchespecially
his huge game against the Chiefs. Yeah, I know, it's the Chiefs.
But the Packers and Lions are closer the Chiefs in defensive prowess
than they are to the Ravens and Bills.
Wide Receivers? The big names show up at the top with greater
consistency, but this is even more reason to be aware of the seasonal
context and the amount of games sampled.
WR Consistency |
Last |
First |
G |
Avg Of FF Pts |
Subpar |
Elite |
WR#1 |
WR #2 |
WR #3 |
WR #4 |
Moss |
Randy |
9 |
15.81 |
22.22% |
55.56% |
66.67% |
66.67% |
77.78% |
77.78% |
Harrison |
Marvin |
9 |
15.01 |
11.11% |
44.44% |
55.56% |
66.67% |
77.78% |
88.89% |
Boldin |
Anquan |
3 |
14.8 |
0.00% |
66.67% |
66.67% |
66.67% |
100.00% |
100.00% |
Burress |
Plaxico |
9 |
13.8 |
11.11% |
44.44% |
66.67% |
77.78% |
77.78% |
88.89% |
Holt |
Torry |
9 |
13.74 |
33.33% |
55.56% |
55.56% |
55.56% |
66.67% |
66.67% |
Owens |
Terrell |
8 |
13.21 |
25.00% |
37.50% |
62.50% |
75.00% |
75.00% |
75.00% |
Toomer |
Amani |
9 |
11.86 |
33.33% |
11.11% |
44.44% |
55.56% |
66.67% |
66.67% |
Horn |
Joe |
9 |
11.33 |
44.44% |
22.22% |
33.33% |
33.33% |
55.56% |
55.56% |
Ferguson |
Robert |
5 |
11.36 |
20.00% |
40.00% |
40.00% |
40.00% |
60.00% |
80.00% |
Mason |
Derrick |
9 |
10.82 |
11.11% |
33.33% |
55.56% |
55.56% |
66.67% |
88.89% |
Jackson |
Darrell |
8 |
10.54 |
25.00% |
25.00% |
37.50% |
50.00% |
62.50% |
75.00% |
McCardell |
Keenan |
9 |
10.14 |
44.44% |
33.33% |
33.33% |
44.44% |
55.56% |
55.56% |
Coles |
Laveranues |
9 |
9.99 |
44.44% |
33.33% |
44.44% |
44.44% |
44.44% |
55.56% |
Booker |
Marty |
9 |
9.2 |
33.33% |
22.22% |
44.44% |
44.44% |
55.56% |
55.56% |
Smith |
Rod |
8 |
9.18 |
37.50% |
12.50% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
62.50% |
Wayne |
Reggie |
6 |
9.1 |
33.33% |
16.67% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
66.67% |
Thompson |
Derrius |
5 |
9.14 |
40.00% |
0.00% |
60.00% |
60.00% |
60.00% |
60.00% |
Bruce |
Isaac |
8 |
9.09 |
37.50% |
12.50% |
37.50% |
37.50% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
Rice |
Jerry |
9 |
8.97 |
33.33% |
22.22% |
55.56% |
55.56% |
66.67% |
66.67% |
Pinkston |
Todd |
9 |
8.94 |
44.44% |
33.33% |
44.44% |
44.44% |
44.44% |
55.56% |
Taylor |
Travis |
9 |
8.51 |
33.33% |
11.11% |
44.44% |
44.44% |
55.56% |
55.56% |
Driver |
Donald |
8 |
8.5 |
25.00% |
12.50% |
37.50% |
37.50% |
50.00% |
75.00% |
Smith |
Jimmy |
9 |
8.3 |
33.33% |
11.11% |
44.44% |
44.44% |
44.44% |
44.44% |
Conway |
Curtis |
7 |
8.39 |
57.14% |
14.29% |
42.86% |
42.86% |
42.86% |
42.86% |
Walker |
Javon |
5 |
8.38 |
60.00% |
20.00% |
40.00% |
40.00% |
40.00% |
40.00% |
Johnson |
Keyshawn |
6 |
8.27 |
50.00% |
16.67% |
33.33% |
33.33% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
Stallworth |
Donte |
5 |
8.28 |
60.00% |
20.00% |
40.00% |
40.00% |
40.00% |
40.00% |
Chrebet |
Wayne |
6 |
8.13 |
50.00% |
0.00% |
33.33% |
33.33% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
Jurevicius |
Joe |
4 |
7.95 |
75.00% |
25.00% |
25.00% |
25.00% |
25.00% |
25.00% |
Ward |
Hines |
9 |
7.99 |
55.56% |
11.11% |
22.22% |
22.22% |
22.22% |
44.44% |
Kennison |
Eddie |
9 |
7.84 |
44.44% |
11.11% |
22.22% |
22.22% |
33.33% |
44.44% |
Lelie |
Ashley |
6 |
7.75 |
50.00% |
0.00% |
33.33% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
Northcutt |
Dennis |
3 |
7.7 |
66.67% |
0.00% |
33.33% |
33.33% |
33.33% |
33.33% |
Chambers |
Chris |
9 |
7.73 |
44.44% |
11.11% |
33.33% |
33.33% |
44.44% |
55.56% |
Morgan |
Quincy |
9 |
7.53 |
55.56% |
22.22% |
33.33% |
33.33% |
33.33% |
44.44% |
Muhammad |
Muhsin |
6 |
7.38 |
66.67% |
16.67% |
16.67% |
16.67% |
16.67% |
33.33% |
Parker |
Eric |
2 |
7.2 |
50.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
Osgood |
Kassim |
3 |
7.2 |
66.67% |
33.33% |
33.33% |
33.33% |
33.33% |
33.33% |
Gardner |
Rod |
9 |
6.99 |
55.56% |
11.11% |
33.33% |
33.33% |
44.44% |
44.44% |
Johnson |
Kevin |
9 |
6.93 |
66.67% |
11.11% |
33.33% |
33.33% |
33.33% |
33.33% |
Stokley |
Brandon |
5 |
6.72 |
60.00% |
20.00% |
20.00% |
20.00% |
20.00% |
40.00% |
Price |
Peerless |
9 |
6.64 |
55.56% |
11.11% |
22.22% |
22.22% |
22.22% |
33.33% |
Johnson |
Chad |
9 |
6.66 |
55.56% |
11.11% |
33.33% |
33.33% |
44.44% |
44.44% |
McCareins |
Justin |
4 |
6.58 |
25.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
25.00% |
25.00% |
75.00% |
|
Two players that obviously are experiencing great second halves
are Muhsin Muhammad and Chad Johnson. Neither have good historical
stats, but it should stop you from playing them with confidence.
Robert Ferguson has an interesting stat line hereplus he has
become more involved in the Packers' attack as of late. The Gut
Check wouldn't start him with confidence, but if you need to take
a chance, he may not be a bad choice. Javon Walker's numbers seem
low, but remember that last year's great ending is somewhat deflated
by the sample of his previous seasonsstart him with confidence.
Although Amani Toomer has been a great historical choice, Yours
Truly believes you have to consider the context of this season
and make the decision to avoid him unless seriously desperate.
In fact, The Gut Check might consider Ferguson over Toomer this
year. Toomer has also been quietly playing with a leg injury and
it's having a noticeable effect even discounting Eli's learning
curve.
Hines Ward appears to be another disappointment down the stretch.
Week 16's match up with the Ravens should be a game where Roethlisberger
will be forced to throw to winand Ward should be his security
blanket in what will be a big game.
Tight ends, as usual, are a tough group to predict outside the
top three. Gonzalez, Shockey, Pollard, and Crumpler are obvious
plays. Throw in Gates and Witten within the context of this season
and with the exception of Todd Heap, The Gut Check has mentioned
most of the list worthy of consideration.
TE Consistency |
Last |
First |
G |
Avg Of FF Pts |
Subpar |
Elite |
TE #1 |
TE #2 |
Gonzalez |
Tony |
9 |
8.82 |
22.22% |
22.22% |
77.78% |
77.78% |
Dunn |
Jason |
1 |
8 |
0.00% |
100.00% |
100.00% |
100.00% |
Shockey |
Jeremy |
3 |
7.77 |
33.33% |
66.67% |
66.67% |
66.67% |
Pollard |
Marcus |
9 |
6.98 |
44.44% |
33.33% |
55.56% |
55.56% |
Fitzsimmons |
Casey |
1 |
6.9 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
100.00% |
100.00% |
Crumpler |
Alge |
7 |
6.77 |
28.57% |
42.86% |
71.43% |
71.43% |
Gates |
Antonio |
3 |
6.63 |
33.33% |
33.33% |
66.67% |
66.67% |
Witten |
Jason |
2 |
6.55 |
50.00% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
Jolley |
Doug |
3 |
6.4 |
33.33% |
33.33% |
66.67% |
66.67% |
Williams |
Boo |
7 |
5.63 |
42.86% |
42.86% |
42.86% |
57.14% |
Stevens |
Jerramy |
5 |
5.48 |
40.00% |
40.00% |
60.00% |
60.00% |
Heap |
Todd |
9 |
4.88 |
55.56% |
22.22% |
33.33% |
44.44% |
Johnson |
Eric |
6 |
4.57 |
50.00% |
0.00% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
Lewis |
Chad |
9 |
4.37 |
88.89% |
11.11% |
11.11% |
11.11% |
Smith |
L.J. |
2 |
4.1 |
50.00% |
0.00% |
50.00% |
50.00% |
Franks |
Bubba |
7 |
3.83 |
85.71% |
14.29% |
14.29% |
14.29% |
Kinney |
Erron |
8 |
3.6 |
75.00% |
12.50% |
25.00% |
25.00% |
Miller |
Billy |
6 |
3.53 |
83.33% |
16.67% |
16.67% |
16.67% |
Jones |
Freddie |
7 |
3.5 |
85.71% |
14.29% |
14.29% |
14.29% |
McMichael |
Randy |
5 |
3.04 |
80.00% |
20.00% |
20.00% |
20.00% |
|
Speaking of Heap, his numbers are lower than expected due to the
presence of Shannon Sharpe early in his career and injuries. Based
on his recent 4-touchdown performance he obviously waited until
he was really 100% to return to the Ravens.
The Gut Check does believe Erron Kinney, L.J. Smith, and Bubba
Franks could be surprisingly decent starts towards the end. Smith
is getting better looks and will continue to as defenses focus
more on Westbrook. Franks and Kinney are facing defenses with
relatively weak linebackers and safetiesboth are tight ends
that are easily overlooked due to mediocre performances thus far.
Good luck to those of you still alive!
|