Scoring Proficiency
9/30/04
The “Gut Feeling” is often synonymous with a sense
of desperation resulting from a lack of preparation. The Gut Check
is a huge proponent of studying the numbers, but there’s
a point where one can place too much emphasis on the wrong information.
This can result in the undervaluing or overlooking a player’s
potential. Therefore, The Weekly Gut Check is devoted to examining
the frame of reference behind certain number-driven guidelines
that fantasy football owners use to make decisions.
Although The Weekly Gut Check doesn’t claim to be psychic,
he does believe that he can dispel certain numbers biases and
help you make the best choices for your team. We’ll keep
a running tally of The Weekly Gut Check’s insights. This
way you can gauge his views as something to seriously consider,
or at least seriously consider running the opposite way as fast
as you can!
The Gut Check generally devotes most of his research to performance
leagues where yardage statistics heavily factor into fantasy scoring.
Yet scoring leagues that minimize the yardage statistics are very
popular, and present an opportunity for a different approach to
researching consistency
in fantasy players. Even if you are in more yardage-oriented leagues,
knowing which players score the most oftennote that The Gut
Check said most often, and not strictly the mostcan
be a valuable source of information. So Yours Truly is devoting
this week's column to the most prolific touchdown scorers in fantasy
football.
What is the methodology involved? Yet again, Doug Drinen's www.pro-football-reference.com
statistics and The Gut Check's database are the sources for this
information. Here are the steps taken to derive this information.
- Calculate the total touches (carries, passing attempts, and
receptions) per player by position. Yours Truly did not count
passing attempts for running backs, receptions for quarterbacks,
or rushing/passing attempts for wide receivers. These are too
few and far between to make an impact.
- Calculate the total touchdowns by position. This may include
touchdowns derived from attempts not counted (as described in
the bullet points above). This may inflate the results for a
small number of players but not significantly.
- Calculate the Touchdowns per Game by position.
- Calculate the Touches per Touchdown by position.
The Tds/Game and Touches/Td results have some similarities, but
also illustrate some interesting differences. The best performing
players for the Tds/Game statistic generally see the ball a lot
while the Touches/Td truly shows how prolific these players are
when measured strictly on production per opportunity. This may
help us spot players on the rise.
Let's start with the top 12 quarterbacks in touchdowns per game
for last year and the past three seasons.
QBs: 2003 |
Last |
First |
G |
Touches |
TDs |
TDs/G |
Culpepper |
Daunte |
14 |
526 |
29 |
2.07 |
McNair |
Steve |
14 |
437 |
28 |
2 |
Garcia |
Jeff |
13 |
446 |
25 |
1.92 |
Hasselbeck |
Matt |
16 |
549 |
28 |
1.75 |
Bulger |
Marc |
15 |
561 |
26 |
1.73 |
Plummer |
Jake |
11 |
339 |
18 |
1.64 |
Green |
Trent |
16 |
549 |
26 |
1.63 |
Brooks |
Aaron |
16 |
570 |
26 |
1.63 |
Flutie |
Doug |
7 |
200 |
11 |
1.57 |
Pennington |
Chad |
10 |
318 |
15 |
1.5 |
Brady |
Tom |
16 |
570 |
24 |
1.5 |
Ramsey |
Patrick |
11 |
353 |
15 |
1.36 |
|
|
QBs: 2001 -2003 |
Last |
First |
G |
Touches |
TDs |
TDs/G |
Culpepper |
Daunte |
57 |
2,183 |
116 |
2.04 |
Garcia |
Jeff |
61 |
2,254 |
121 |
1.98 |
Manning |
Peyton |
64 |
2,412 |
122 |
1.91 |
Bulger |
Marc |
22 |
787 |
41 |
1.86 |
Favre |
Brett |
64 |
2,220 |
112 |
1.75 |
Gannon |
Rich |
55 |
2,070 |
96 |
1.75 |
Brooks |
Aaron |
54 |
2,028 |
93 |
1.72 |
McNabb |
Donovan |
57 |
2,203 |
96 |
1.68 |
Green |
Trent |
56 |
1,868 |
87 |
1.55 |
Grbac |
Elvis |
29 |
1,065 |
45 |
1.55 |
McNair |
Steve |
61 |
1,983 |
94 |
1.54 |
Brady |
Tom |
47 |
1,663 |
72 |
1.53 |
|
|
Daunte Culpepper continues to show why he's statistically been the
best player in fantasy football for the past three years. In a traditional
performance league, Culpepper's 2+ touchdowns per game average means
8-12 points come from touchdowns (rushing or passing)or an
incredible 33%-50% of his total fantasy points per game (over 24
points per game) come from his proficiency in the red zone. With
8 tds in 2004 (just one behind Manning after his incredible game
in week three), Culpepper shows no signs of slowing down.
There are four quarterbacks that made the top 12 in 2003 that
weren't on the map over this extended period: Matt Hasselbeck,
Doug Flutie, Chad Pennington, and Patrick Ramsey. Flutie and Ramsay
are no longer starters and don't project as such this year. Ramsay
still looks like viable keeper league material, but fantasy owners
will need to remain patient. But this stat shows that Hasselbeck
and Pennington are clearly making a move towards the elite, and
statistically speaking, may wind up displacing a perennial performer
like Gannon within the next year or two.
The most interesting piece of information may be the comparison
of Jeff Garcia to Donovan McNabb. Over a three-year period, Garcia
was only second to Culpepper in touchdowns per game, while McNabb
was a distant eighth in touchdowns per game. In 2003 alone, McNabb
wasn't even in the top twelve quarterbacks.
When The Gut Check compares McNabb and Garcia's starts in 2004,
Terrell Owens might have a pointas un-media-friendly as
it was this summerabout Garcia's play. An "Owens'-equipped,"
McNabb is on par with Culpepper in every major statistical category
for quarterbacks in 2004. In contrast, Garcia ranks near the bottom
without Owens. Yours Truly finds this explanation a little too
simplistic to stand on, but he does feel that McNabb has been
underrated for several years as a quarterback because he's lacked
playmakers and Garcia no longer benefits from having the quality
of players that he once had as the 49ers' starter. If Lee Suggs
can provide some spark upon his return, this could open things
up in the passing game for Garciajust don't expect huge
numbers in 2004.
Speaking of Owens' let's look at receivers and their touchdowns
per game.
WRs: 2003 |
Last |
First |
G |
Rec |
TDs |
TDs/G |
Moss |
Randy |
16 |
111 |
17 |
1.06 |
Berlin |
Eddie |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Holt |
Torry |
16 |
117 |
12 |
0.75 |
Chambers |
Chris |
16 |
64 |
11 |
0.69 |
Horn |
Joe |
15 |
78 |
10 |
0.67 |
Harrison |
Marvin |
15 |
94 |
10 |
0.67 |
Moss |
Santana |
16 |
74 |
10 |
0.63 |
Johnson |
Chad |
16 |
90 |
10 |
0.63 |
Ward |
Hines |
16 |
95 |
10 |
0.63 |
Givens |
David |
10 |
34 |
6 |
0.6 |
Rogers |
Charles |
5 |
22 |
3 |
0.6 |
Stokley |
Brandon |
5 |
22 |
3 |
0.6 |
Jackson |
Darrell |
15 |
68 |
9 |
0.6 |
Owens |
Terrell |
15 |
80 |
9 |
0.6 |
Walker |
Javon |
16 |
41 |
9 |
0.56 |
Swayne |
Kevin |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0.5 |
Barlow |
Reggie |
2 |
3 |
1 |
0.5 |
Lewis |
Jermaine |
2 |
4 |
1 |
0.5 |
Calico |
Tyrone |
8 |
18 |
4 |
0.5 |
Jurevicius |
Joe |
4 |
12 |
2 |
0.5 |
Streets |
Tai |
14 |
47 |
7 |
0.5 |
Boston |
David |
14 |
70 |
7 |
0.5 |
McCardell |
Keenan |
16 |
84 |
8 |
0.5 |
Mason |
Derrick |
16 |
95 |
8 |
0.5 |
|
|
WRs: 2001 -2003 |
Last |
First |
G |
Rec |
TDs |
TDs/G |
Douglas |
Dameane |
2 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
Owens |
Terrell |
59 |
370 |
52 |
0.88 |
Harrison |
Marvin |
63 |
448 |
50 |
0.79 |
Moss |
Randy |
64 |
376 |
49 |
0.77 |
Rogers |
Charles |
5 |
22 |
3 |
0.6 |
Horn |
Joe |
63 |
344 |
34 |
0.54 |
Boldin |
Anquan |
16 |
101 |
8 |
0.5 |
Calico |
Tyrone |
8 |
18 |
4 |
0.5 |
Horne |
Tony |
4 |
4 |
2 |
0.5 |
McGriff |
Travis |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0.5 |
Mason |
Derrick |
57 |
310 |
27 |
0.47 |
Ward |
Hines |
64 |
349 |
30 |
0.47 |
Hilliard |
Ike |
47 |
194 |
22 |
0.47 |
Chambers |
Chris |
45 |
164 |
21 |
0.47 |
Smith |
Jimmy |
58 |
337 |
27 |
0.47 |
Stallworth |
Donte |
24 |
67 |
11 |
0.46 |
Jackson |
Darrell |
59 |
253 |
27 |
0.46 |
Holt |
Torry |
64 |
371 |
29 |
0.45 |
Smith |
Rod |
62 |
375 |
28 |
0.45 |
Carter |
Cris |
36 |
177 |
16 |
0.44 |
Moss |
Santana |
32 |
107 |
14 |
0.44 |
Bruce |
Isaac |
62 |
299 |
27 |
0.44 |
Rison |
Andre |
14 |
41 |
6 |
0.43 |
Boston |
David |
54 |
271 |
23 |
0.43 |
|
|
Over a three-year period, Owens averaged nearly a touchdown per
gamethe best rate for all receivers (if one factors out
players like Dameane Douglas with only six receptions during this
same period). Marvin Harrison and Randy Moss aren't far behind.
In fact, Moss was clearly the best of the best in 2003 with more
than one touchdown per game.
Names that appear to lend some credence to the ups and downs
of some teams at the start of 2004 also appear on these tables.
Brandon Stokely, another player that made the most of his limited
opportunities last year, is demonstrating his knack for the big
play in 2004 with the Colts. Javon Walker has shown why he was
rated so highly entering the 2004 season. The Titans really miss
Tyrone Calico and these 2003 stats mirror how Tennessee was using
him throughout the 2004 preseason before his injuries. Tennessee
should have a chance to turn around their slow start once Calico
returns to the fold. Keenan McCardell's holdout is among the myriad
of reasons why the Bucs are off to a horrendous beginning. Roy
Williams isn't on the list, but looks like's taken over the role
that the Lions hoped they'd have with Charles Rogersa player
that is listed here.
Running backs touchdowns per game, like quarterbacks, is most
often a reflection of the sheer number opportunities they receive
in comparison to receivers and tight ends.
RBs: 2003 |
Last |
First |
G |
Att |
Rec |
TDs |
TDs/G |
Holmes |
Priest |
16 |
320 |
74 |
27 |
1.69 |
Green |
Ahman |
16 |
355 |
50 |
20 |
1.25 |
Portis |
Clinton |
13 |
290 |
38 |
14 |
1.08 |
Tomlinson |
LaDainian |
16 |
313 |
100 |
17 |
1.06 |
Alexander |
Shaun |
16 |
326 |
42 |
16 |
1 |
Faulk |
Marshall |
11 |
209 |
45 |
11 |
1 |
Lewis |
Jamal |
16 |
388 |
26 |
14 |
0.88 |
James |
Edgerrin |
13 |
309 |
51 |
11 |
0.85 |
Westbrook |
Brian |
15 |
116 |
38 |
11 |
0.73 |
Henry |
Travis |
15 |
332 |
28 |
11 |
0.73 |
Johnson |
Rudi |
13 |
214 |
21 |
9 |
0.69 |
Duckett |
T.J. |
16 |
197 |
11 |
11 |
0.69 |
Buckhalter |
Correll |
14 |
125 |
10 |
9 |
0.64 |
Davis |
Stephen |
14 |
318 |
14 |
8 |
0.57 |
Davis |
Domanick |
14 |
238 |
47 |
8 |
0.57 |
Williams |
Ricky |
24 |
440 |
72 |
13 |
0.54 |
Mack |
Stacey |
8 |
93 |
9 |
4 |
0.5 |
Smith |
Onterrio |
10 |
107 |
15 |
5 |
0.5 |
Williams |
Moe |
16 |
174 |
65 |
8 |
0.5 |
McAllister |
Deuce |
16 |
351 |
69 |
8 |
0.5 |
Thomas |
Anthony |
13 |
244 |
9 |
6 |
0.46 |
Dunn |
Warrick |
11 |
125 |
37 |
5 |
0.45 |
Bettis |
Jerome |
16 |
246 |
13 |
7 |
0.44 |
Staley |
Duce |
16 |
97 |
36 |
7 |
0.44 |
|
|
RBs: 2001 - 2003 |
Last |
First |
G |
Att |
Rec |
TDs |
TDs/G |
Faulk |
Marshall |
53 |
934 |
289 |
68 |
1.28 |
Portis |
Clinton |
29 |
563 |
71 |
31 |
1.07 |
Holmes |
Priest |
61 |
1095 |
238 |
63 |
1.03 |
Mungro |
James |
11 |
116 |
14 |
10 |
0.91 |
Tomlinson |
LaDainian |
48 |
1024 |
238 |
42 |
0.88 |
Green |
Ahman |
62 |
1208 |
242 |
53 |
0.85 |
Alexander |
Shaun |
61 |
986 |
150 |
52 |
0.85 |
James |
Edgerrin |
49 |
1124 |
199 |
35 |
0.71 |
Williams |
Ricky |
69 |
1395 |
224 |
47 |
0.68 |
Smith |
Lamar |
46 |
843 |
82 |
31 |
0.67 |
Henry |
Travis |
44 |
870 |
93 |
29 |
0.66 |
George |
Eddie |
64 |
1374 |
145 |
40 |
0.63 |
Smith |
Robert |
16 |
295 |
36 |
10 |
0.63 |
Taylor |
Fred |
47 |
954 |
135 |
29 |
0.62 |
McAllister |
Deuce |
43 |
692 |
131 |
26 |
0.6 |
Crockett |
Zack |
47 |
186 |
18 |
28 |
0.6 |
Davis |
Domanick |
14 |
238 |
47 |
8 |
0.57 |
Mack |
Stacey |
42 |
458 |
43 |
24 |
0.57 |
Lewis |
Jamal |
48 |
1005 |
100 |
27 |
0.56 |
Davis |
Stephen |
57 |
1213 |
98 |
32 |
0.56 |
Duckett |
T.J. |
27 |
326 |
20 |
15 |
0.56 |
Johnson |
Rudi |
17 |
231 |
27 |
9 |
0.53 |
Dunn |
Warrick |
55 |
761 |
199 |
29 |
0.53 |
Anderson |
Mike |
54 |
625 |
60 |
28 |
0.52 |
|
|
All-around threats top both lists (with the exception of Mungro)
for running backs. It's no surprise the most consistent producers
overall tend to be the most consistent scorers (Holmes, Faulk,
Portis, Tomlinson, and Green).
Only Tony Gonzalez approaches a td/gm average that is comparable
to a top-rated wide receiver. Unless the Chief's tight end is
yours in scoring-league, it may be a waste of time to worry about
a tight end.
TEs: 2003 |
Last |
First |
G |
Rec |
TDs |
TDs/G |
Gonzalez |
Tony |
16 |
71 |
10 |
0.63 |
Sharpe |
Shannon |
15 |
62 |
8 |
0.53 |
Williams |
Boo |
13 |
41 |
5 |
0.38 |
Franks |
Bubba |
13 |
30 |
4 |
0.31 |
Graham |
Daniel |
13 |
38 |
4 |
0.31 |
Becht |
Anthony |
15 |
40 |
4 |
0.27 |
Jones |
Terry |
12 |
19 |
3 |
0.25 |
Mili |
Itula |
16 |
46 |
4 |
0.25 |
Conwell |
Ernie |
8 |
26 |
2 |
0.25 |
Pollard |
Marcus |
13 |
40 |
3 |
0.23 |
Wycheck |
Frank |
9 |
17 |
2 |
0.22 |
Gates |
Antonio |
9 |
24 |
2 |
0.22 |
|
|
TEs: 2001 -2003 |
Last |
First |
G |
Rec |
TDs |
TDs/G |
Gonzalez |
Tony |
63 |
300 |
32 |
0.51 |
Glover |
Andrew |
10 |
21 |
4 |
0.4 |
Thomason |
Jeff |
18 |
25 |
7 |
0.39 |
McWilliams |
Johnny |
8 |
22 |
3 |
0.38 |
Franks |
Bubba |
57 |
154 |
21 |
0.37 |
Pollard |
Marcus |
57 |
160 |
20 |
0.35 |
Williams |
Boo |
30 |
74 |
10 |
0.33 |
Sharpe |
Shannon |
58 |
263 |
18 |
0.31 |
Becht |
Anthony |
52 |
120 |
16 |
0.31 |
Harris |
Jackie |
24 |
54 |
7 |
0.29 |
Wiggins |
Jermaine |
28 |
50 |
8 |
0.29 |
Walls |
Wesley |
42 |
113 |
12 |
0.29 |
|
|
When we look at the ratio of touches to scores, the differences
can have a significant impact on the ratings of players heading
into a season. Here are the ratings for quarterbacks.
QBs: 2003 |
Last |
First |
G |
Tches |
TDs |
Tch to TD |
McNair |
Steve |
14 |
437 |
28 |
15.61 |
Volek |
Billy |
6 |
80 |
5 |
16 |
Garcia |
Jeff |
13 |
446 |
25 |
17.84 |
Culpepper |
Daunte |
14 |
526 |
29 |
18.14 |
Flutie |
Doug |
7 |
200 |
11 |
18.18 |
Plummer |
Jake |
11 |
339 |
18 |
18.83 |
Hasselbeck |
Matt |
16 |
549 |
28 |
19.61 |
Green |
Trent |
16 |
549 |
26 |
21.12 |
Pennington |
Chad |
10 |
318 |
15 |
21.2 |
Bulger |
Marc |
15 |
561 |
26 |
21.58 |
Brooks |
Aaron |
16 |
570 |
26 |
21.92 |
Ramsey |
Patrick |
11 |
353 |
15 |
23.53 |
|
|
QBs: 2001 -2003 |
Last |
First |
G |
Tches |
TDs |
Tch to TD |
Stoerner |
Clint |
5 |
64 |
5 |
12.8 |
Volek |
Billy |
6 |
80 |
5 |
16 |
Garcia |
Jeff |
61 |
2,254 |
121 |
18.63 |
Culpepper |
Daunte |
57 |
2,183 |
116 |
18.82 |
Pennington |
Chad |
28 |
775 |
41 |
18.9 |
Detmer |
Koy |
10 |
57 |
3 |
19 |
Bulger |
Marc |
22 |
787 |
41 |
19.2 |
Manning |
Peyton |
64 |
2,412 |
122 |
19.77 |
Favre |
Brett |
64 |
2,220 |
112 |
19.82 |
Garrard |
David |
5 |
83 |
4 |
20.75 |
McNair |
Steve |
61 |
1,983 |
94 |
21.1 |
Green |
Trent |
56 |
1,868 |
87 |
21.47 |
|
|
In 2003, Steve McNair scored a touchdown for every 15.61 attempts,
clearly better than Garcia and Culpepper. Too bad McNair couldn't
stay healthy. If you had the Titans' backup though, there wasn't
much of a drop offBilly Volek averaged 1 touchdown per 16
attempts!!! Obviously the Titans' offense was clicking last year,
but adding Volek is likely a smart move.
For starters, Volek was a coveted player in the off-season, which
means there were enough teams that truly liked what they saw in
him. Todd BoumanDuante Culpepper's backupput up some
nice games a few years ago when the Vikings' starter went down,
but he received nowhere the attention that Volek or Delhomme did
in the last two years. Volek was actually starting in front of
David Carr at Fresno state and had an excellent TD/INT ratio during
his collegiate career. Add Volek to the list of previous under
the radar types like Marc Bulger, Tom Brady, and Jake Delhomme,
players that were acquired out of college with little fanfare,
but proved more than capable. The Gut Check believes Volek is
capable of putting up starter-quality performances in McNair's
likely absence.
Jake Plummer is another surprising player on the 2003 list. If
your league doesn't penalize for boneheaded plays (most don't),
Plummer is an excellent value in scoring leagues. If one of those
young receivers in Denver can actually turn the corner in terms
of their adjustment to the NFL, look out!
But probably the one starter The Gut Check would love to have
on his squads is Chad Pennington. Pennington's stats generally
don't show how productive he compared to the best fantasy quarterbacks
because of his injury-marred 2003 season, but this stat paints
a more accurate picture. Factoring out players that started less
than 10 games from 2000-2003, only Daunte Culpepper and Jeff Garcia
scored more often. 2004 is shaping up to be a monster year for
the Jets' quarterback.
RBs: 2003 |
Last |
First |
G |
Att |
Rec |
TDs |
Tch/TD |
Buckhalter |
Correll |
14 |
125 |
10 |
9 |
23.89 |
Duckett |
T.J. |
16 |
197 |
11 |
11 |
28.91 |
Mack |
Stacey |
8 |
93 |
9 |
4 |
32.25 |
Smith |
Onterrio |
10 |
107 |
15 |
5 |
36.4 |
Cartwright |
Rock |
15 |
107 |
18 |
4 |
44.75 |
Johnson |
Rudi |
13 |
214 |
21 |
9 |
44.78 |
Jackson |
James |
10 |
102 |
14 |
3 |
48 |
Bettis |
Jerome |
16 |
246 |
13 |
7 |
48.14 |
Westbrook |
Brian |
15 |
116 |
38 |
11 |
48.55 |
Thomas |
Anthony |
13 |
244 |
9 |
6 |
49.67 |
Staley |
Duce |
16 |
97 |
36 |
7 |
49.86 |
Wheatley |
Tyrone |
15 |
159 |
12 |
4 |
51.75 |
Lewis |
Jamal |
16 |
388 |
26 |
14 |
53.71 |
Davis |
Stephen |
14 |
318 |
14 |
8 |
53.75 |
Henry |
Travis |
15 |
332 |
28 |
11 |
58.18 |
Portis |
Clinton |
13 |
290 |
38 |
14 |
58.71 |
Dunn |
Warrick |
11 |
125 |
37 |
5 |
62 |
Alexander |
Shaun |
16 |
326 |
42 |
16 |
62.38 |
Barlow |
Kevan |
16 |
201 |
35 |
7 |
63.71 |
Faulk |
Marshall |
11 |
209 |
45 |
11 |
64 |
Green |
Ahman |
16 |
355 |
50 |
20 |
67.75 |
Hearst |
Garrison |
12 |
178 |
25 |
4 |
69.5 |
Gary |
Olandis |
13 |
113 |
13 |
2 |
69.5 |
Jones |
Thomas |
15 |
137 |
24 |
3 |
69.67 |
|
|
RBs: 2001 - 2003 |
Last |
First |
G |
Att |
Rec |
TDs |
Tch/TD |
Cloud |
Mike |
26 |
113 |
9 |
9 |
21.56 |
Crockett |
Zack |
47 |
186 |
18 |
28 |
24.64 |
Mungro |
James |
11 |
116 |
14 |
10 |
25.6 |
Brookins |
Jason |
11 |
151 |
6 |
5 |
36.2 |
Smith |
Onterrio |
10 |
107 |
15 |
5 |
36.4 |
Brown |
Dee |
12 |
101 |
17 |
5 |
37.2 |
Duckett |
T.J. |
27 |
326 |
20 |
15 |
41.73 |
Johnson |
Leon |
24 |
126 |
17 |
5 |
42.2 |
Buckhalter |
Correll |
28 |
254 |
23 |
11 |
46.09 |
Davenport |
Najeh |
20 |
116 |
11 |
3 |
49.67 |
Cartwright |
Rock |
22 |
110 |
29 |
5 |
51 |
Autry |
Darnell |
10 |
112 |
24 |
4 |
52 |
Johnson |
Rudi |
17 |
231 |
27 |
9 |
52.67 |
Jordan |
Lamont |
38 |
169 |
35 |
9 |
53.78 |
Prentice |
Travis |
25 |
187 |
38 |
10 |
56.7 |
Minor |
Travis |
36 |
143 |
33 |
6 |
56.83 |
Dayne |
Ron |
47 |
530 |
22 |
15 |
57.33 |
Taylor |
Chester |
30 |
96 |
34 |
4 |
58 |
Holcombe |
Robert |
40 |
143 |
38 |
7 |
58.43 |
Allen |
Terry |
14 |
213 |
18 |
5 |
60.6 |
Fisher |
Tony |
23 |
110 |
39 |
5 |
61 |
Westbrook |
Brian |
29 |
162 |
47 |
11 |
61.73 |
Canidate |
Trung |
31 |
240 |
32 |
8 |
62 |
Mack |
Stacey |
42 |
458 |
43 |
24 |
62.08 |
|
|
There are some major differences between running backs with a high
touchdown per game rate and a high touchdown per carry rate. Let's
see if we can find some useful information from these tables. It's
readily apparent that many of these players were goal line options
(Zack Crockett and Jason Brookins)excellent players to have
in touchdown-only leagues at that time. But there are also a number
of promising, young backs worth keeping an eye on for the future.
Onterrio Smith has already proven he's a talent in relief of
Michael Bennett. Its too bad Smith is awaiting suspension from
the NFL. He might have had a chance to hold onto the job. The
Vikings' S.O.D. averaged a touchdown every 36 touches in 20034th
among RBs last season.
Probably the most frustrating situation had to be the Eagles'
backfield of 2003. Buckhalter, Westbrook, and Duce Staley all
figure prominently on the 2003 list but all cut into the others'
opportunities. Staley now has to contend with Jerome Bettis, who
appears on track to continue his 2003 TD/attempt rate. Although
Buckhalter is out, Westbrook hasn't seen the end zone in 2004.
It took three games for Westbrook to get going in 2003 and The
Gut Check expects the Eagles' feature back to start crossing the
goal line very soon. On the other end of the spectrum is T.J.
Ducketthis ratio looks excellent, but so far he's been non-existent
in the Falcons offense. This may be one of the few times Yours
Truly is partially right about something this season (more on
this next week).
The Gut Check decided to put more parameters on receivers and
limited this list to receivers with at least 32 receptions for
both a 1-year and 4-year period.
WRs: 2003 |
Last |
First |
G |
Rec |
TDs |
Catch/TD |
Walker |
Javon |
16 |
41 |
9 |
4.56 |
Givens |
David |
10 |
34 |
6 |
5.67 |
Chambers |
Chris |
16 |
64 |
11 |
5.82 |
Moss |
Randy |
16 |
111 |
17 |
6.53 |
McCareins |
Justin |
16 |
47 |
7 |
6.71 |
Streets |
Tai |
14 |
47 |
7 |
6.71 |
Moss |
Santana |
16 |
74 |
10 |
7.4 |
Jackson |
Darrell |
15 |
68 |
9 |
7.56 |
Horn |
Joe |
15 |
78 |
10 |
7.8 |
Davis |
Andre |
16 |
40 |
5 |
8 |
Engram |
Bobby |
15 |
52 |
6 |
8.67 |
Owens |
Terrell |
15 |
80 |
9 |
8.89 |
Johnson |
Chad |
16 |
90 |
10 |
9 |
Harrison |
Marvin |
15 |
94 |
10 |
9.4 |
Ward |
Hines |
16 |
95 |
10 |
9.5 |
Ferguson |
Robert |
13 |
38 |
4 |
9.5 |
Wayne |
Reggie |
15 |
68 |
7 |
9.71 |
Holt |
Torry |
16 |
117 |
12 |
9.75 |
Brown |
Troy |
12 |
40 |
4 |
10 |
Hilliard |
Ike |
13 |
60 |
6 |
10 |
Boston |
David |
14 |
70 |
7 |
10 |
Glenn |
Terry |
13 |
52 |
5 |
10.4 |
McCardell |
Keenan |
16 |
84 |
8 |
10.5 |
Pathon |
Jerome |
16 |
44 |
4 |
11 |
Kennison |
Eddie |
16 |
56 |
5 |
11.2 |
Warrick |
Peter |
15 |
80 |
7 |
11.43 |
Edwards |
Troy |
12 |
35 |
3 |
11.67 |
Gardner |
Rod |
16 |
59 |
5 |
11.8 |
Mason |
Derrick |
16 |
95 |
8 |
11.88 |
Walters |
Troy |
12 |
36 |
3 |
12 |
|
|
WRs: 2001 -2003 |
Last |
First |
G |
Rec |
TDs |
Catch/TD |
Campbell |
Kelly |
18 |
38 |
7 |
5.43 |
McCants |
Darnerian |
20 |
48 |
8 |
6 |
Stallworth |
Donte |
24 |
67 |
11 |
6.09 |
Givens |
David |
17 |
43 |
7 |
6.14 |
Walker |
Javon |
30 |
64 |
10 |
6.4 |
Rison |
Andre |
14 |
41 |
6 |
6.83 |
Johnson |
Patrick |
20 |
41 |
6 |
6.83 |
Davis |
Andre |
30 |
77 |
11 |
7 |
Owens |
Terrell |
59 |
370 |
52 |
7.12 |
Moss |
Santana |
32 |
107 |
14 |
7.64 |
McCareins |
Justin |
29 |
69 |
9 |
7.67 |
Moss |
Randy |
64 |
376 |
49 |
7.67 |
Chambers |
Chris |
45 |
164 |
21 |
7.81 |
Robinson |
Marcus |
39 |
129 |
16 |
8.06 |
Fryar |
Irving |
14 |
41 |
5 |
8.2 |
Hatchette |
Matthew |
19 |
33 |
4 |
8.25 |
Proehl |
Ricky |
53 |
141 |
17 |
8.29 |
Bradford |
Corey |
42 |
100 |
12 |
8.33 |
Alexander |
Derrick |
34 |
119 |
14 |
8.5 |
Ferguson |
Robert |
22 |
60 |
7 |
8.57 |
Dyson |
Kevin |
29 |
103 |
12 |
8.58 |
Parker |
Eric |
12 |
35 |
4 |
8.75 |
Shepherd |
Leslie |
12 |
35 |
4 |
8.75 |
Hilliard |
Ike |
47 |
194 |
22 |
8.82 |
Harrison |
Marvin |
63 |
448 |
50 |
8.96 |
Stokley |
Brandon |
32 |
81 |
9 |
9 |
Dixon |
Ron |
23 |
36 |
4 |
9 |
Johnson |
Charles |
26 |
73 |
8 |
9.13 |
Freeman |
Antonio |
56 |
174 |
19 |
9.16 |
Jackson |
Darrell |
59 |
253 |
27 |
9.37 |
|
|
Javon Walker is near, or at the top of both lists and continues
to show the promise the Packers saw in him when they selected the
FSU product in the late-first round. One of the reasons Walker may
not be the full-blown, #1 WR has to do with his running mate, Robert
Ferguson. The former Aggie has a very respectable rate of scoring
1 Td for every 9.5 grabs in 2003 and 1 in 8.57 during the span of
2000-2003. Throw in Donald Driver, and its no wonder many owners
were wary of investing too much in a Green Bay receiver until the
dust clears. Of course, last week's Indianapolis game should have
changed this perceptionof course Ferguson was hurt so some
may continue to show caution.
Chris Chambers is languishing in Miami. Ricky Williams' retirement
started a huge collapse for a team that appeared to be very promising
this spring. Chambers would be an all-pro on just about any other
team. His 2003 rate of 1 TD per 5.84 receptions is especially
impressive for 64 receptions. Yours Truly wouldn't be surprised
if Chambers demands a trade (if he isn't a free agent at that
time) after the season if Wannstedt is still the coach.
Donté Stallworth's career ratio of 1 TD per 6.09 receptions
is a big reason owners drool over his prospects. Andre Davis,
Justin McCareins, and David Givens also join this list of players
that exhibited past scoring proficiency that owners and NFL teams
alike hope to build upon in the future.
But for players with at least 100 career receptions the top five
are:
1. Terrell Owens
2. Santana Moss
3. Randy Moss
4. Chris Chambers
5. Marcus Robinson
Once again, Terrell Owens appears to top this list as the best
wide receiver in fantasy football in terms of overall consistency.
Considering that Owens was rating anywhere between 3rd (Yours
Truly among them) and 8th in FFToday's preseason staff rankings
for receivers, you can bet the common perceptionnot just
at this site, but elsewherethat Owens ranks behind Holt,
Harrison, andin many casesRandy Moss will likely change
dramatically as we head into 2005.
Santana Moss is a pleasant surprise here. It's clear the Jets
made a good move to acquire Justin McCareinsa player with
a ratio sandwiched between the Santana and Randyin order
to make their offense more explosive. The Gut Check sees big things
from these two as the season progresses.
As inept as Miami seems right now, the team appeared to be on
the right track with acquiring David Boston as bookend to Chambers.
The Gut Check just doesn't see how the Dolphins cannot go to a
more wide-open attack with Chambers, Boston, and Booker if they
retain all three players. Kurt Warner could be an excellent fit
in Miami if he continues to play well with the Giants.
The pairing of Moss and Robinson is a terrific idea in theory.
Robinson just can't stay healthy.
Tight Ends have some mixed results. Gonzalez and Franks were
at the top of the list (discounting Terry Jonesa good player,
but got his time in relief of Todd Heap) in 2003, but over the
span of 2000-2003 Gonzalez is used so often as a receiving threat
in all situations, his numbers drop significantly. Franks on the
other hand has traditionally been used as a scoring threat near
the goal line.
TEs: 2003 |
Last |
First |
G |
Rec |
TDs |
Catch/TD |
Jones |
Terry |
12 |
19 |
3 |
6.33 |
Gonzalez |
Tony |
16 |
71 |
10 |
7.1 |
Franks |
Bubba |
13 |
30 |
4 |
7.5 |
Sharpe |
Shannon |
15 |
62 |
8 |
7.75 |
Williams |
Boo |
13 |
41 |
5 |
8.2 |
Wycheck |
Frank |
9 |
17 |
2 |
8.5 |
Graham |
Daniel |
13 |
38 |
4 |
9.5 |
Becht |
Anthony |
15 |
40 |
4 |
10 |
Mili |
Itula |
16 |
46 |
4 |
11.5 |
Fitzsimmons |
Casey |
10 |
23 |
2 |
11.5 |
Gates |
Antonio |
9 |
24 |
2 |
12 |
Schobel |
Matt |
11 |
24 |
2 |
12 |
|
|
TEs: 2001 -2003 |
Last |
First |
G |
Rec |
TDs |
Catch/TD |
Thomason |
Jeff |
18 |
25 |
7 |
3.57 |
Glover |
Andrew |
10 |
21 |
4 |
5.25 |
Robinson |
Jeff |
14 |
18 |
3 |
6 |
Wiggins |
Jermaine |
28 |
50 |
8 |
6.25 |
McWilliams |
Johnny |
8 |
22 |
3 |
7.33 |
Franks |
Bubba |
57 |
154 |
21 |
7.33 |
Rivers |
Marcellus |
11 |
22 |
3 |
7.33 |
Williams |
Boo |
30 |
74 |
10 |
7.4 |
Becht |
Anthony |
52 |
120 |
16 |
7.5 |
Jones |
Terry |
19 |
30 |
4 |
7.5 |
Dudley |
Rickey |
34 |
61 |
8 |
7.63 |
Harris |
Jackie |
24 |
54 |
7 |
7.71 |
|
|
Jermaine Wiggins might be a decent fill-in for Jim Kleinsasser if
you are desperate for a wavier wire pickup. He managed one touchdown
per 6.25 receptions from 2000-2003. Teams will likely do more to
defend Randy Moss in scoring situations and if Marcus Robinson stays
in the training room, Wiggins could surprise. Note: Wiggins is out
a couple weeks with a broken hand.
Boo Williams has always been seen as a scoring options and has
grown into a popular selection for fantasy ownerswhich these
numbers illustrate. Anthony Becht also appears to be a nice scoring
league option in TE-required lineups.
All in all, nothing earth-shattering here, but the information
presents a good confirmation that opportunity is the first sign
that high performance should follow. Additionally, these stats
may point to promising players that might get future opportunity
and make solid, keeper picks in the present. Next week, The Gut
Check grades his first quarter performance.
|