| |
|
Running Back, Baltimore Ravens
|
Want Custom Fantasy Scoring?
You are not logged in. You must be logged in and create a league profile to apply
custom fantasy scoring to the stat, projection and ranking pages.
Login or Register
|
Draft: 2011 Round 1 (28)
College: Alabama
Ht: 5’9” Wt: 215 DOB: 1989-12-21 Age: 31 |
| |
Rushing | Receiving |
Fantasy |
| Season |
Team |
G |
Att |
Yard |
Avg |
TD | Target |
Rec |
Yard |
Avg |
TD |
FPts |
FPts/G |
| 2011 |
NO |
10 |
122 |
474 |
3.9 |
5 |
13 |
11 |
46 |
4.2 |
0 |
82.0 |
8.2 |
| 2012 |
NO |
16 |
156 |
602 |
3.9 |
5 |
10 |
6 |
29 |
4.8 |
0 |
93.1 |
5.8 |
| 2013 |
NO |
11 |
78 |
386 |
4.9 |
1 |
11 |
7 |
68 |
9.7 |
0 |
51.4 |
4.7 |
| 2014 |
NO |
13 |
226 |
964 |
4.3 |
9 |
36 |
29 |
145 |
5.0 |
0 |
164.9 |
12.7 |
| 2015 |
NO |
12 |
165 |
767 |
4.6 |
6 |
60 |
50 |
405 |
8.1 |
0 |
153.2 |
12.8 |
| 2016 |
NO |
16 |
205 |
1,044 |
5.1 |
6 |
58 |
46 |
319 |
6.9 |
4 |
196.3 |
12.3 |
| 2017 |
NO |
16 |
230 |
1,124 |
4.9 |
12 |
71 |
58 |
416 |
7.2 |
0 |
226.0 |
14.1 |
| 2018 |
NO |
12 |
138 |
645 |
4.7 |
6 |
27 |
21 |
170 |
8.1 |
1 |
123.5 |
10.3 |
| 2019 |
BAL |
15 |
202 |
1,018 |
5.0 |
10 |
29 |
26 |
247 |
9.5 |
5 |
216.5 |
14.4 |
| 2020 |
BAL |
10 |
72 |
299 |
4.2 |
2 |
8 |
6 |
50 |
8.3 |
0 |
46.9 |
4.7 |
| 2020 (Projected) |
BAL |
|
182 |
855 |
4.7 |
6 |
|
27 |
217 |
8.0 |
2 |
155.2 |
|
|
|
So while I whiffed on Jackson in this column last season in an epic way, I did call out Ingram as a great value pick; and that he was! Bouncing back to have one of the best seasons of his nine-year career, Ingram set a career high in total touchdowns (15) while rushing for over 1,000 yards for the third time. Part of an unstoppable backfield, Ingram provided the stabilizing veteran presence on an offense surrounded by young dynamic talent. Unfortunately for Ingram's 2020 outlook, that talent got even more dynamic with the drafting of J.K Dobbins in the 2nd round of the draft.
Ingram's final 2019 numbers look great, but the 5 receiving touchdowns prop up an otherwise lackluster receiving game. This can be partly blamed by design as the offense was way down the list in pass attempts, but Ingram still did sputter at times last season. Two early season games against KC in Week 1 and Miami in Week 3 provided 50% of his total rushing touchdowns (5) and the lack of receptions really hurt in weeks he didn't score. There are only so many carries to go around and the presence of a rushing quarterback like Jackson and drafting of Dobbins are going to further eat into Ingram's touches. While an easy RB1 in standard leagues last season, I think Ingram has to be viewed more of a RB2 in 2020. I don't see Dobbins taking over as the majority starter this season, but Ingram is going to need to hold off the explosive rookie as long as possible. Even if another 1,000 season might be off the table, Ingram still offers double-digit touchdown potential and will be a solid complementary piece for your fantasy team.
|
|
 J.K. Dobbins, Mark Ingram eligible to play for Ravens
Baltimore's RBBC back on
By: Mike Krueger | Tue Dec 1, 9:07 am
|  | J.K. Dobbins and Mark Ingram had their initial positive tests Nov. 22. Under NFL-NFLPA protocols, there's a mandatory 10-day isolation period. Today is Day 10, so they couldn't have played last Thursday ... or Sunday ... or tonight ... but they are eligible to play tomorrow night. (Tom Pelissero on Twitter)
FFToday's Take: The Ravens will be getting a few of their players off the COVID-19 list for Wednesday afternoon's game with the Steelers including two of their running backs. In other words, the RBBC we've come to know and love in Baltimore is back. All hoping to get bellcow usage from Gus Edwards can stand down.
| Ravens-Steelers game moved to Sunday afternoon
7 Ravens players have tested positive in 3 days
By: Mike Krueger | Wed Nov 25, 12:50 pm
| | The #Ravens-#Steelers game previously set for Thursday night is being postponed to Sunday afternoon. The first in several weeks. (Ian Rapoport on Twitter)
FFToday's Take: According to Rapoport, 7 players have tested positive in 3 days, including Mark Ingram and J.K. Dobbins. This move will give JuJu Smith-Schuster more team to heal his foot. Evn with the game pushed back to Sunday, it's still likely that Ingram and Dobbins will miss.
| Mark Ingram, J.K. Dobbins placed on COVID-19 list
Gus Edwards expected to start
By: Mike Krueger | Mon Nov 23, 2:47 pm
| | #Ravens RBs Mark Ingram and J.K. Dobbins have tested positive for COVID-19 and will be placed on the reserve list later today, according to sources. All aboard the Gus Bus for Thursday vs. the #Steelers. (Mike Garafolo on Twitter)
FFToday's Take: It's looking like Gus Edwards will get the start for the Ravens on a short week. We could also see more of Justice Hill in a backup role. The Steelers represent a terrible matchup on paper but based on volume, Gus will be in the RB2 mix for Week 12.
| Mark Ingram misses practice Thursday
Ankle injury
By: Mike Krueger | Thu Oct 29, 2:22 pm
| | Ravens moved practice indoors because of rain. ESPN's
@jamisonhensley served as pool reporter. Not practicing according to Hensley: RB Mark Ingram (ankle), CB Jimmy Smith (Achilles) and NT Brandon Williams (gets Thursday's off). Marlon Humphrey (illness) returned to practice. (Jeff Zrebiec on Twitter)
FFToday's Take: Ingram seems to be trending towards missing Week 8 against the Steelers which would leave Gus Edwards and J.K. Dobbins as the main running back options for the Ravens. The Steelers have given up the fewest fantasy points to running backs through seven weeks.
|
|
| |
Rushing | Receiving |
Fantasy |
| Week |
Opp |
Result |
Att |
Yard |
Avg |
TD | Target |
Rec |
Yard |
Avg |
TD |
FPts |
| 1 |
CLE |
W 38-6 |
10 |
29 |
2.9 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
2.9 |
| 2 |
at HOU |
W 33-16 |
9 |
55 |
6.1 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
22 |
11.0 |
0 |
13.7 |
| 3 |
KC |
L 20-34 |
7 |
30 |
4.3 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
3.0 |
| 4 |
at WAS |
W 31-17 |
8 |
34 |
4.3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
3.0 |
0 |
9.7 |
| 5 |
CIN |
W 27-3 |
11 |
57 |
5.2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
5.7 |
| 6 |
at PHI |
W 30-28 |
5 |
20 |
4.0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
2.0 |
| 10 |
at NE |
L 17-23 |
5 |
5 |
1.0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
24 |
12.0 |
0 |
2.9 |
| 11 |
TEN |
L 24-30 |
2 |
2 |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
0.2 |
| 13 |
DAL |
W 34-17 |
6 |
28 |
4.7 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1.0 |
0 |
2.9 |
| 17 |
at CIN |
W 38-3 |
9 |
39 |
4.3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
3.9 |
|
| |
Rushing | Receiving |
Fantasy |
| Week |
Opp |
Result |
Att |
Yard |
Avg |
TD | Target |
Rec |
Yard |
Avg |
TD |
FPts |
| 1 |
at MIA |
W 59-10 |
14 |
107 |
7.6 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
22.7 |
| 2 |
ARI |
W 23-17 |
13 |
47 |
3.6 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
30 |
15.0 |
0 |
7.7 |
| 3 |
at KC |
L 28-33 |
16 |
103 |
6.4 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
32 |
8.0 |
0 |
31.5 |
| 4 |
CLE |
L 25-40 |
12 |
71 |
5.9 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
7.1 |
| 5 |
at PIT |
W 26-23 |
19 |
44 |
2.3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
2.5 |
0 |
10.9 |
| 6 |
CIN |
W 23-17 |
13 |
52 |
4.0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
22 |
11.0 |
0 |
13.4 |
| 7 |
at SEA |
W 30-16 |
12 |
46 |
3.8 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
7.0 |
0 |
5.3 |
| 9 |
NE |
W 37-20 |
15 |
115 |
7.7 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
29 |
14.5 |
0 |
14.4 |
| 10 |
at CIN |
W 49-13 |
9 |
34 |
3.8 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
9.4 |
| 11 |
HOU |
W 41-7 |
13 |
48 |
3.7 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
37 |
12.3 |
2 |
20.5 |
| 12 |
at LAR |
W 45-6 |
15 |
111 |
7.4 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
7.0 |
1 |
23.8 |
| 13 |
SF |
W 20-17 |
15 |
59 |
3.9 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
1.5 |
0 |
6.2 |
| 14 |
at BUF |
W 24-17 |
15 |
50 |
3.3 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
29 |
9.7 |
0 |
7.9 |
| 15 |
NYJ |
W 42-21 |
13 |
76 |
5.8 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
10 |
10.0 |
1 |
20.6 |
| 16 |
at CLE |
W 31-15 |
8 |
55 |
6.9 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
36 |
18.0 |
1 |
15.1 |
| DP |
TEN |
L 12-28 |
6 |
22 |
3.7 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
9 |
9.0 |
0 |
3.1 |
|
DP = Divisional Playoff
| |
Rushing | Receiving |
Fantasy |
| Week |
Opp |
Result |
Att |
Yard |
Avg |
TD | Target |
Rec |
Yard |
Avg |
TD |
FPts |
| 5 |
WAS |
W 43-19 |
16 |
53 |
3.3 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
20 |
10.0 |
0 |
19.3 |
| 7 |
at BAL |
W 24-23 |
12 |
32 |
2.7 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
10 |
5.0 |
0 |
4.2 |
| 8 |
at MIN |
W 30-20 |
13 |
63 |
4.8 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
29 |
9.7 |
0 |
9.2 |
| 9 |
LAR |
W 45-35 |
9 |
33 |
3.7 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
3.0 |
0 |
3.6 |
| 10 |
at CIN |
W 51-14 |
13 |
104 |
8.0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
58 |
19.3 |
1 |
22.2 |
| 11 |
PHI |
W 48-7 |
16 |
103 |
6.4 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
22.3 |
| 12 |
ATL |
W 31-17 |
11 |
52 |
4.7 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
14 |
7.0 |
0 |
6.6 |
| 13 |
at DAL |
L 10-13 |
7 |
27 |
3.9 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0.5 |
0 |
2.8 |
| 14 |
at TB |
W 28-14 |
13 |
52 |
4.0 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1.0 |
0 |
11.3 |
| 15 |
at CAR |
W 12-9 |
12 |
63 |
5.3 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
11 |
5.5 |
0 |
7.4 |
| 16 |
PIT |
W 31-28 |
11 |
35 |
3.2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
8 |
8.0 |
0 |
10.3 |
| 17 |
CAR |
L 14-33 |
5 |
28 |
5.6 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
15 |
7.5 |
0 |
4.3 |
| DP |
PHI |
W 20-14 |
9 |
53 |
5.9 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
9 |
4.5 |
0 |
6.2 |
| CC |
LAR |
L 23-26 |
9 |
31 |
3.4 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
6 |
3.0 |
0 |
3.7 |
|
DP = Divisional Playoff CC = Conference Championship
Click the icon to add a player to My FF Today Track Players. Track
Players allows you to keep better tabs on players that are most important to you, including your
own custom news page and highlighting your players on stat, projection and ranking pages. Note
you must be logged in to use My FF Today.
|
|
?
