| |
|
Quarterback, Chicago Bears
|
Want Custom Fantasy Scoring?
You are not logged in. You must be logged in and create a league profile to apply
custom fantasy scoring to the stat, projection and ranking pages.
Login or Register
|
Draft: 2012 Round 3 (25)
College: Arizona
Ht: 6’6” Wt: 243 DOB: 1989-01-20 Age: 31 |
| QB Rank |
Tier |
ADP-12 |
| #31 |
5 |
- |
|
|
| |
Passing | Rushing |
Fantasy |
| Season |
Team |
G |
Cmp |
Att |
Cmp% |
Yard |
TD |
INT | Att |
Yard |
Avg |
TD |
FPts |
FPts/G |
| 2012 |
PHI |
7 |
161 |
265 |
60.8 |
1,699 |
6 |
5 |
11 |
42 |
3.8 |
1 |
119.2 |
17.0 |
| 2013 |
PHI |
13 |
203 |
317 |
64.0 |
2,891 |
27 |
2 |
56 |
225 |
4.0 |
3 |
293.1 |
22.5 |
| 2014 |
PHI |
8 |
188 |
313 |
60.1 |
2,163 |
13 |
10 |
16 |
68 |
4.3 |
0 |
167.0 |
20.9 |
| 2015 |
STL |
11 |
190 |
337 |
56.4 |
2,052 |
7 |
10 |
17 |
20 |
1.2 |
1 |
138.6 |
12.6 |
| 2016 |
KC |
2 |
36 |
55 |
65.5 |
410 |
3 |
0 |
4 |
-4 |
-1.0 |
0 |
32.1 |
16.1 |
| 2017 |
PHI |
7 |
57 |
101 |
56.4 |
537 |
5 |
2 |
11 |
3 |
0.3 |
0 |
47.2 |
6.7 |
| 2018 |
PHI |
5 |
141 |
195 |
72.3 |
1,413 |
7 |
4 |
9 |
17 |
1.9 |
0 |
100.4 |
20.1 |
| 2019 |
JAC |
4 |
77 |
117 |
65.8 |
736 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
23 |
5.8 |
0 |
51.1 |
12.8 |
| 2020 (Projected) |
CHI |
|
229 |
358 |
64.0 |
2,612 |
17 |
9 |
18 |
42 |
2.3 |
0 |
202.8 |
|
|
|
The Bears become the latest team trying to put the Foles lightning back in the bottle. To be fair, Foles never had a fair shot in Jacksonville, as a busted collarbone followed by the emergence of Gardner Minshew made a long-term stay in northeast Florida unlikely. Off to the much cooler environs of the Windy City, Foles engages in a wholly uninteresting quarterback competition with Trubisky. I think we all know who Foles is as an NFL quarterback by now. He's a guy who has played well in short bursts (2013, and the Eagles SB run) and has been a high level back-up at other times. Chicago, desperate for an alternative to Trubisky, is going to give Foles every chance to unseat the incumbent. The problem is, I don't think it's going to matter much. Yes, Foles is back in an Andy Reid style offense that fits him, but in a league that values quarterbacks above all else, four teams (the Eagles twice!) sent him packing. I do think he'll be a boost to the Chicago receivers as he delivers a much more catchable ball, but with limited athleticism (39 rushing yards in the last four seasons COMBINED), there is a low fantasy ceiling. My best guess is that both Foles and Trubisky make many more starts for the Bears in 2020 than they do for fantasy teams.
|
|
Mitchell Trubisky expected to start Week 1 for Bears
Neither QB looked sharp
By: Mike Krueger | Fri Sep 4, 7:39 pm
|  | Mitchell Trubisky, who watched the Bears decline his fifth-year option and trade for challenger Nick Foles this offseason, was named the starter Friday, sources confirmed to the Sun-Times. To say that he beat out Foles during camp would be a misnomer. Neither was sharp. (Chicago Sun Times)
FFToday's Take: Since neither player stood out, this feels like Trubisky got the nod based on experience with the system. Expect to see Foles make some starts before the year is out. These QBs are weekly dart throws until further notice.
|  Nick Foles leading QB competition in Chicago
Mitchell Trubisky a close second in race to be Bears top signal caller
By: Antonio D'Arcangelis | Wed Aug 26, 8:05 am
| | Nick Foles didn't "run away with the day," but Mitchell Trubisky truly struggled with his accuracy. Other than an interception, only one other throw was off the mark for Foles, while Trubisky had at least six passes get away from him. (NBC Sports)
FFToday's Take: There’s no question Foles was (and probably is) the better quarterback -- so it will be interesting to see how Trubisky responds after two straight underwhelming practices. If you're taking a shot at any Bears QB in the final draft rounds of a large league that would necessitate that, make it Foles.
|
|
| |
Passing | Rushing |
Fantasy |
| Week |
Opp |
Result |
Cmp |
Att |
Cmp% |
Yard |
TD |
INT | Att |
Yard |
Avg |
TD |
FPts |
| 1 |
KC |
L 26-40 |
5 |
8 |
62.5 |
75 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
7.8 |
| 11 |
at IND |
L 13-33 |
33 |
47 |
70.2 |
296 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
22.8 |
| 12 |
at TEN |
L 20-42 |
32 |
48 |
66.7 |
272 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
20 |
6.7 |
0 |
15.6 |
| 13 |
TB |
L 11-28 |
7 |
14 |
50.0 |
93 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
3.0 |
0 |
5.0 |
|
| |
Passing | Rushing |
Fantasy |
| Week |
Opp |
Result |
Cmp |
Att |
Cmp% |
Yard |
TD |
INT | Att |
Yard |
Avg |
TD |
FPts |
| 1 |
ATL |
W 18-12 |
19 |
34 |
55.9 |
117 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
-1 |
-1.0 |
0 |
5.8 |
| 2 |
at TB |
L 21-27 |
35 |
48 |
72.9 |
334 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
8 |
2.7 |
0 |
21.5 |
| 15 |
at LAR |
W 30-23 |
24 |
31 |
77.4 |
270 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
2.5 |
0 |
14.0 |
| 16 |
HOU |
W 32-30 |
35 |
49 |
71.4 |
471 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1.0 |
0 |
39.7 |
| 17 |
at WAS |
W 24-0 |
28 |
33 |
84.8 |
221 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
2.0 |
0 |
19.5 |
| WC |
at CHI |
W 16-15 |
25 |
40 |
62.5 |
266 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
-1 |
-1.0 |
0 |
21.2 |
| DP |
at NO |
L 14-20 |
18 |
31 |
58.1 |
201 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
20.1 |
|
WC = Wild-Card DP = Divisional Playoff
Click the icon to add a player to My FF Today Track Players. Track
Players allows you to keep better tabs on players that are most important to you, including your
own custom news page and highlighting your players on stat, projection and ranking pages. Note
you must be logged in to use My FF Today.
|
|
?
