| |
|
Quarterback, Chicago Bears
|
Want Custom Fantasy Scoring?
You are not logged in. You must be logged in and create a league profile to apply
custom fantasy scoring to the stat, projection and ranking pages.
Login or Register
|
Draft: 2012 Round 3 (25)
College: Arizona
Ht: 6’6” Wt: 243 DOB: 1989-01-20 Age: 32 |
| |
Passing | Rushing |
Fantasy |
| Season |
Team |
G |
Cmp |
Att |
Cmp% |
Yard |
TD |
INT | Att |
Yard |
Avg |
TD |
FPts |
FPts/G |
| 2012 |
PHI |
7 |
161 |
265 |
60.8 |
1,699 |
6 |
5 |
11 |
42 |
3.8 |
1 |
86.2 |
12.3 |
| 2013 |
PHI |
13 |
203 |
317 |
64.0 |
2,891 |
27 |
2 |
56 |
225 |
4.0 |
3 |
256.1 |
19.7 |
| 2014 |
PHI |
8 |
188 |
313 |
60.1 |
2,163 |
13 |
10 |
16 |
68 |
4.3 |
0 |
119.3 |
14.9 |
| 2015 |
STL |
11 |
190 |
337 |
56.4 |
2,052 |
7 |
10 |
17 |
20 |
1.2 |
1 |
94.1 |
8.6 |
| 2016 |
KC |
2 |
36 |
55 |
65.5 |
410 |
3 |
0 |
4 |
-4 |
-1.0 |
0 |
28.0 |
14.0 |
| 2017 |
PHI |
7 |
57 |
101 |
56.4 |
537 |
5 |
2 |
11 |
3 |
0.3 |
0 |
33.8 |
4.8 |
| 2018 |
PHI |
5 |
141 |
195 |
72.3 |
1,413 |
7 |
4 |
9 |
17 |
1.9 |
0 |
74.2 |
14.8 |
| 2019 |
JAC |
4 |
77 |
117 |
65.8 |
736 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
23 |
5.8 |
0 |
35.7 |
8.9 |
| 2020 |
CHI |
9 |
202 |
312 |
64.7 |
1,852 |
10 |
8 |
16 |
1 |
0.1 |
1 |
104.2 |
11.6 |
| 2020 (Projected) |
CHI |
|
229 |
358 |
64.0 |
2,612 |
17 |
9 |
18 |
42 |
2.3 |
0 |
152.7 |
|
|
|
The Bears become the latest team trying to put the Foles lightning back in the bottle. To be fair, Foles never had a fair shot in Jacksonville, as a busted collarbone followed by the emergence of Gardner Minshew made a long-term stay in northeast Florida unlikely. Off to the much cooler environs of the Windy City, Foles engages in a wholly uninteresting quarterback competition with Trubisky. I think we all know who Foles is as an NFL quarterback by now. He's a guy who has played well in short bursts (2013, and the Eagles SB run) and has been a high level back-up at other times. Chicago, desperate for an alternative to Trubisky, is going to give Foles every chance to unseat the incumbent. The problem is, I don't think it's going to matter much. Yes, Foles is back in an Andy Reid style offense that fits him, but in a league that values quarterbacks above all else, four teams (the Eagles twice!) sent him packing. I do think he'll be a boost to the Chicago receivers as he delivers a much more catchable ball, but with limited athleticism (39 rushing yards in the last four seasons COMBINED), there is a low fantasy ceiling. My best guess is that both Foles and Trubisky make many more starts for the Bears in 2020 than they do for fantasy teams.
|
|
| There is no news to report for this player from the past 90 days. |
| |
Passing | Rushing |
Fantasy |
| Week |
Opp |
Result |
Cmp |
Att |
Cmp% |
Yard |
TD |
INT | Att |
Yard |
Avg |
TD |
FPts |
| 3 |
at ATL |
W 30-26 |
16 |
29 |
55.2 |
188 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
-3 |
-1.0 |
0 |
17.2 |
| 4 |
IND |
L 11-19 |
26 |
42 |
61.9 |
249 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
-1 |
-0.5 |
0 |
11.9 |
| 5 |
TB |
W 20-19 |
30 |
42 |
71.4 |
243 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
-1 |
-1.0 |
0 |
11.6 |
| 6 |
at CAR |
W 23-16 |
23 |
39 |
59.0 |
198 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
4 |
0.8 |
1 |
16.3 |
| 7 |
at LAR |
L 10-24 |
28 |
40 |
70.0 |
261 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
6.4 |
| 8 |
NO |
L 23-26 |
28 |
41 |
68.3 |
272 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
16.9 |
| 9 |
at TEN |
L 17-24 |
36 |
52 |
69.2 |
335 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
1.0 |
0 |
21.6 |
| 10 |
MIN |
L 13-19 |
15 |
26 |
57.7 |
106 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2.0 |
0 |
2.4 |
| 16 |
at JAC |
W 41-17 |
0 |
1 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
-2 |
-1.0 |
0 |
-0.2 |
|
| |
Passing | Rushing |
Fantasy |
| Week |
Opp |
Result |
Cmp |
Att |
Cmp% |
Yard |
TD |
INT | Att |
Yard |
Avg |
TD |
FPts |
| 1 |
KC |
L 26-40 |
5 |
8 |
62.5 |
75 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
7.0 |
| 11 |
at IND |
L 13-33 |
33 |
47 |
70.2 |
296 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
- |
0 |
17.8 |
| 12 |
at TEN |
L 20-42 |
32 |
48 |
66.7 |
272 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
20 |
6.7 |
0 |
12.9 |
| 13 |
TB |
L 11-28 |
7 |
14 |
50.0 |
93 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
3.0 |
0 |
-2.0 |
|
| |
Passing | Rushing |
Fantasy |
| Week |
Opp |
Result |
Cmp |
Att |
Cmp% |
Yard |
TD |
INT | Att |
Yard |
Avg |
TD |
FPts |
| 1 |
ATL |
W 18-12 |
19 |
34 |
55.9 |
117 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
-1 |
-1.0 |
0 |
2.6 |
| 2 |
at TB |
L 21-27 |
35 |
48 |
72.9 |
334 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
8 |
2.7 |
0 |
16.2 |
| 15 |
at LAR |
W 30-23 |
24 |
31 |
77.4 |
270 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
2.5 |
0 |
9.3 |
| 16 |
HOU |
W 32-30 |
35 |
49 |
71.4 |
471 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1.0 |
0 |
30.9 |
| 17 |
at WAS |
W 24-0 |
28 |
33 |
84.8 |
221 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
2.0 |
0 |
15.2 |
| WC |
at CHI |
W 16-15 |
25 |
40 |
62.5 |
266 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
-1 |
-1.0 |
0 |
14.5 |
| DP |
at NO |
L 14-20 |
18 |
31 |
58.1 |
201 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
14.0 |
|
WC = Wild-Card DP = Divisional Playoff
Click the icon to add a player to My FF Today Track Players. Track
Players allows you to keep better tabs on players that are most important to you, including your
own custom news page and highlighting your players on stat, projection and ranking pages. Note
you must be logged in to use My FF Today.
|
|
?
