Second Half Wonders
6/15/07
The “Gut Feeling” is often synonymous with a sense
of desperation resulting from a lack of preparation. The Gut Check
is a huge proponent of studying the numbers, but there’s
a point where one can place too much emphasis on the wrong information.
This can result in the undervaluing or overlooking a player’s
potential. Therefore, The Weekly Gut Check is devoted to examining
the frame of reference behind certain number-driven guidelines
that fantasy football owners use to make decisions.
Although The Weekly Gut Check doesn’t claim to be psychic,
he does believe that he can dispel certain numbers biases and
help you make the best choices for your team. We’ll keep
a running tally of The Weekly Gut Check’s insights. This
way you can gauge his views as something to seriously consider,
or at least seriously consider running the opposite way as fast
as you can!
Last year the Gut Check
developed a statistical measurement to spot next season’s
potential breakout players at each position. It’s based on
one of the more common reasons fantasy owners use to tout a sleeper:
a great stretch run during the previous season. Many owners have
observed a high level of performance from the second half of the
previous season is a good predictor for success the following year.
So the Gut Check profiled players that had a significantly better
second half in 2005. These were players that haven’t been
top tier players lately, or still learning the pro game.
The Gut Check took a sample of offensive skill players that had
a statistically significant improvement in production during the
second half of a season and then checked to see how well the player
maintained this level of improvement during the next season. Beginning
with wide receivers sampled from 2002-2004, the Second Half
Wonder Theory had some juice. Since last week the Gut Check
just finished examining breakout
receivers for 2007 I Volume 91, let’s see how it looks
when the 2006 results for receivers are taken into account with
2005’s second half studs:
Second
Half Wonders: Wide Receivers |
WRs |
2002 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2003 Status |
Wayne Chrebet |
6.1 |
9.7 |
37% |
5 |
52% |
Hurt |
Darrell Jackson |
6.3 |
12.3 |
49% |
11.2 |
91% |
Starter |
James McKnight |
2.8 |
8.0 |
65% |
4.6 |
58% |
Hurt |
Koren Robinson |
6.8 |
13.1 |
48% |
7.7 |
59% |
Starter |
Travis Taylor |
6.5 |
10.1 |
36% |
5.5 |
54% |
Starter |
Amani Toomer |
7.4 |
15.4 |
52% |
8.5 |
55% |
Starter |
WRs |
2003 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2004 Status |
Anquan Boldin |
7.4 |
13.1 |
44% |
6.86 |
52% |
Hurt |
Bobby Engram |
4.2 |
8.8 |
52% |
4.8 |
55% |
NS |
Az Hakim |
1.9 |
9.1 |
79% |
7.13 |
78% |
Shared |
Mushin Muhammad |
4.4 |
8.8 |
50% |
14.9 |
169% |
Starter |
Todd Pinkston |
3.04 |
6.4 |
53% |
5.6 |
88% |
Shared |
Marcus Robinson |
0.9 |
10.8 |
92% |
7.6 |
70% |
Shared |
WRs |
2004 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2005 Status |
Drew Bennett |
8.3 |
18.2 |
54% |
7.5 |
41% |
Hurt |
Antonio Bryant |
4.5 |
9 |
50% |
7.8 |
87% |
Starter |
Nate Burleson |
7.8 |
12.2 |
36% |
3.2 |
26% |
Hurt |
Lee Evans |
5.7 |
12.8 |
55% |
7.5 |
59% |
Starter |
Joey Galloway |
2.2 |
12.5 |
82% |
11.2 |
90% |
Starter |
T.J. Housmandzadeh |
4.9 |
11.7 |
58% |
10.7 |
91% |
Starter |
Dennis Northcutt |
3.2 |
8.6 |
63% |
3.7 |
43% |
Shared |
Jerry Porter |
6.1 |
13.3 |
54% |
7.7 |
58% |
Hurt |
Donte Stallworth |
5.2 |
8.8 |
41% |
8.5 |
97% |
Starter |
WRs |
2005 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2006 Status |
Roy Williams |
6.2 |
10.2 |
39% |
10.5 |
103% |
Starter |
Reggie Brown |
3.3 |
6.9 |
53% |
8.6 |
125% |
Starter |
Amani Toomer |
5.1 |
8.14 |
38% |
6.8 |
84% |
Hurt |
Mark Clayton |
1.4 |
8.37 |
83% |
7.6 |
91% |
Starter |
Total Sample |
4.98 |
10.77 |
54% |
9.25 |
86% |
|
|
The two numbers after the receiver’s name are the fantasy
points per game averaged from weeks 1-8 and 9-17, respectively.
The % column is the percentage
increase from the first half of the season to the second half.
Next Yr is the average fantasy
points per game for the next season. Attainment
is how close did the Next Yr numbers approach the production in
the second half of the previous year. The Total
Sample is only an average of the players that were starters
the following year and remained healthy.
The trend remains the same when including the 2005-2006 stats:
a receiver that exhibits a significant jump in production during
the second half of a season has a pretty high likelihood of maintaining
that jump in production if they start and remain healthy during
the following year. From 2003-2006 (representing “the following
year,” for 2002-2005), 62% of the second-half wonder receivers
that were healthy and in the starting lineup for their teams the
next year attained at least 87% of their previous year’s
jump in production. Seven out of thirteen receivers were over
90% attainment and three exceeded their second half improvement
from the previous year—two of those three did it last year.
Overall, the second half wonders generally increased their production
by 54% of their first half totals. In the following year they
maintained at least 86% of their fantasy points per game average.
This should clearly tell you that a second half wonder that is
supposed to be a starter the next year should at least produce
at 86% of that stretch run production. That’s a great indicator
for success. You may not wind up with a top-15 performer but let’s
see how the receivers yours truly mentioned for 2006 performed
to this theory’s projected rank. With the exception of Toomer,
who was lost for the season after an injury, the other three exceeded
expectations:
Name |
Team |
Year |
2nd Half Avg. |
Projected 2006* |
Actual 2006 |
Projected Rank** |
Actual Rank |
Roy Williams |
DET |
2005 |
10.2 |
8.87 |
10.5 |
18th |
10th |
Reggie Brown |
PHI |
2005 |
6.9 |
6.85 |
8.6 |
35th |
21st |
Amani Toomer |
NYG |
2005 |
8.14 |
7.08 |
6.8 |
21st |
77th |
Mark Clayton |
BAL |
2005 |
8.37 |
6.59 |
7.6 |
36th |
28th |
* 2006 projected fpts/gm
based on attainment research described above with 87%
minimum attainment.
** Projected positional rank based on 2005's fpts/gm
totals. |
|
Although only 3 of the 4 receivers produced as worthwhile starters
in a 3-receiver lineup for a 12-team league, the 4th was on track
to do the same prior to getting hurt. As mentioned, Williams and
Brown were the higher profile, mid-round picks and Toomer and
Clayton provided undervalued depth at the bottom third of fantasy
drafts.
With this in mind, who are the Second Half Wonders from 2006?
Last Name |
First Name |
1st Half |
2nd Half |
% |
Projected 2007
@86% |
Projected 2007
@100.75% |
Projected Rank
@100.75% |
Curry |
Ronald |
3.01 |
6.30 |
52% |
5.42 |
6.77 |
40th |
Jones |
Matt |
4.15 |
7.71 |
46% |
6.63 |
8.29 |
30th |
Holmes |
Santonio |
4.20 |
7.54 |
44% |
6.49 |
8.11 |
31st |
Hackett |
D.J. |
4.33 |
7.20 |
40% |
6.19 |
7.74 |
33rd |
Clayton |
Mark |
6.00 |
8.91 |
33% |
7.66 |
9.58 |
16th |
Edwards |
Braylon |
7.15 |
9.03 |
21% |
7.77 |
9.71 |
15th |
|
There are six receivers with significantly stronger second halves
in 2006 that have a decent chance to build on their production
in 2007 due to their role with their respective club. Last year,
the Gut Check used the average attainment percentage for the position
to project the next season’s production, but this year he’s
also using the average attainment for the 2006 receivers. The
logic behind this is the fact that breakout players build on their
numbers. If one were to strictly use this theory to pick a breakout
receiver, Braylon Edwards would be the player with Mark Clayton
a close second. Yours truly likes Clayton more than Edwards due
to the veteran QB in Baltimore, but Edwards has proven to be a
talent regardless of the signal caller tossing him the ball.
Second half wonders at running back have nearly the same probability
(63%) as receivers to maintain at least 87% of that production
the following year if they start and stay healthy—even higher
(72%) if you only expect the runner to attain at least 80%.
Second
Half Wonders: Running Backs |
RBs |
2002 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2003 Status |
Tiki Barber |
14.6 |
18.3 |
20% |
11.6 |
63% |
Starter |
Zack Crockett |
3.5 |
8.6 |
59% |
4.4 |
51% |
NS |
Warrick Dunn |
10.3 |
13.5 |
24% |
11.9 |
88% |
Starter |
William Green |
2.7 |
14.3 |
81% |
9.5 |
66% |
Hurt |
Curtis Martin |
9.6 |
13.8 |
30% |
10.6 |
77% |
Starter |
Clinton Portis |
12.4 |
23.7 |
48% |
21.1 |
89% |
Starter |
Tyrone Wheatley |
2.1 |
6.6 |
68% |
6.92 |
105% |
Shared |
RBs |
2003 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2004 Status |
Kevan Barlow |
6.4 |
15.5 |
59% |
9.7 |
63% |
Starter |
Jerome Bettis |
5.1 |
11.4 |
55% |
12.6 |
111% |
Starter |
T.J. Duckett |
7.7 |
11.4 |
32% |
8.3 |
73% |
Shared |
Marshall Faulk |
12.2 |
20.5 |
40% |
9.45 |
46% |
Shared |
Thomas Jones |
2 |
10.5 |
81% |
12.8 |
122% |
Starter |
Brian Westbrook |
7.7 |
12.3 |
37% |
15.8 |
128% |
Starter |
RBs |
2004 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2005 Status |
Tatum Bell |
3 |
12 |
75% |
9.4 |
78% |
Shared |
Derrick Blaylock |
7.4 |
14.6 |
49% |
1 |
7% |
NS |
Nick Goings |
3.5 |
17 |
79% |
1.7 |
10% |
NS |
Stephen Jackson |
5.4 |
10.3 |
48% |
13.1 |
127% |
Starter |
Larry Johnson |
12.5 |
26 |
52% |
21 |
81% |
Starter/Shared |
Kevin Jones |
6.2 |
15.8 |
61% |
8.25 |
52% |
Shared |
Willis McGahee |
9.6 |
17 |
44% |
10.8 |
64% |
Starter |
Ladanian Tomlinson |
16 |
21.4 |
25% |
18.9 |
88% |
Starter |
RBs |
2005 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2006 Status |
Samkon Gado |
6.95 |
15.3 |
55% |
3.94 |
26% |
Shared |
Greg Jones |
3.9 |
9.36 |
48% |
0 |
0% |
Hurt |
Frank Gore |
4.44 |
8.57 |
48% |
17 |
198% |
Starter |
Total Sample |
7.30 |
14.49 |
50% |
10.41 |
72% |
|
|
Four of the eight players that attained at least 88% of their
previous second half productivity average actually exceeded this
total over the course of the next season—and it was often
a significant increase. Heading into 2006 there were three backs
that qualified as second half wonders. None were slated as the
undisputed starter heading into camp. But as predicted, Frank
Gore got the job and made the most of his opportunity.
Name |
Team |
Year |
2nd Half Avg. |
2006* |
Actual 2006 |
Projected Rank** |
Actual Rank |
Samkon Gado |
GB |
2005 |
13.49 |
11.87 |
3.94 |
11th |
60th |
Greg Jones |
JAC |
2005 |
9.36 |
8.24 |
0 |
UR |
21st |
Frank Gore |
SF |
2005 |
8.57 |
7.54 |
6.8 |
27th |
5th |
* 2006 projected fpts/gm
based on attainment research described above with 87%
minimum attainment.
** Projected positional rank based on 2005's fpts/gm
totals. |
|
Here’s what Yours Truly said about Gore last June:
The most intriguing back on this list is Gore. The
Niners’ second-year runner from Miami displayed the kind
of explosion as a rookie two years removed from ACL surgery that
Hurricane fans and scouts did not witness during his senior season.
Gore and Barlow will vie for the starting position, but one has
to think Mike Nolan will favor his draft pick if their preseason
performances are similar. The addition of future Hall of Fame
guard Larry Allen and the return of Jonas Jennings should bolster
the offensive line for the rushing attack to improve in 2006.
Here’s a list of 2006 Second Half Wonders at Running Back:
Last |
First |
1st Half 2006 |
2nd Half 2006 |
% |
Projected 2007
@72% |
Projected 2007
@114.66% |
Projected Rank
@114.66% |
Bush |
Reggie |
6.49 |
14.28 |
55% |
10.28 |
16.37 |
6th |
Williams |
DeAngelo |
4.80 |
8.68 |
45% |
6.25 |
9.95 |
32nd |
Jones-Drew |
Maurice |
10.23 |
17.16 |
40% |
12.35 |
19.67 |
4th |
Lewis |
Jamal |
8.48 |
13.96 |
39% |
10.05 |
16.00 |
7th |
Morency |
Vernand |
3.96 |
5.64 |
30% |
4.06 |
6.47 |
49th |
Benson |
Cedric |
5.90 |
7.58 |
22% |
5.46 |
8.69 |
37th |
Addai |
Joseph |
10.18 |
13.06 |
22% |
9.4 |
14.97 |
11th |
|
The player that made the greatest jump in production in the second
half was none other than Reggie Bush. If you’re still skeptical
of the Saints’ RB producing strictly as an RB, the Gut Check
counters these totals are not for a point per reception scoring
system. Bush had some big games down the stretch of 2006 and proved
he was more than capable of running the ball between the tackles
once he ran with more patience and discipline. If you’re
still not convinced, the Gut Check isn’t going try waking
you up. This is a back he’d take the risk to draft at the
tail end of the first round in 2007.
DeAngelo Williams is another 2nd year runner yours truly would
consider as ideally a #3 RB, but in a pinch he’d draft as
his second RB. The Gut Check thought Williams was the 2nd best
back in the 2006 draft class. The Panthers may not have the additions
the 49ers had to their line, but a healthier unit could set up
Williams for a year where he could crack the top 15 backs—not
as big a jump as Frank Gore, but it still makes Williams a strong
draft day value.
Maurice Jones Drew really needs no explanation. He’s a special
back that should garner strong consideration as a #1 RB around
the same area one might take the chance to draft Reggie Bush this
year. Lump Joseph
Addai with the same group. He’s now the official heir to the
Edgerrin James-like production one came to expect from a back
set behind Peyton Manning. Jamal
Lewis will need a dynamite effort from Cleveland’s revamped
line to hit these projections, but excellent line play makes anything
possible. The Gut Check just wouldn’t count on it, despite the
fact draftniks are comparing rookie OT Joe Thomas to Tony Boselli.
Vernand
Morency is an intriguing player heading into camp. Nebraska
rookie Brandon Jackson has a good chance to contribute and his
talent level is on par to Morency when the incumbent starter was
drafted out of Oklahoma State. But Morency has more experience
with the speed of the game, the Packer’s system (although Jackson
played in a west coast attack under former Raider coach Bill Callahan),
and has more top end speed. Yours truly believes Morency isn’t
likely to make a huge splash as a fantasy impact back, but at
the round one can acquire him, he’s worth consideration.
That leaves Cedric
Benson, a talented back, but one that will get pushed by none
other than the diminutive Garrett Wolfe. Ron Turner already mentioned
Wolfe is good enough to be considered the primary back up to Benson
if he plays to expectation. What the Gut Check loved about the
Northern Illinois back was his effort. As he mentioned in his
2007 Rookie Scouting Portfolio,
“Wolfe is pound-for-pound, the best back in this draft.” The issue
is he doesn’t have enough poundage to match up with Lynch or Peterson.
Yet, don’t be surprised if we see another Warrick Dunn-like back
to make good things happen for the second time in two years.
The tight end position has a less dramatic points swing for second
half wonders, but their attainment percentage for the following
season is higher than receivers and backs.
Second
Half Wonders: Tight Ends |
TEs |
2002 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2003 Status |
Alge Crumpler |
3.4 |
6.1 |
44% |
4.6 |
75% |
Starter |
Doug Jolley |
3.4 |
6.4 |
47% |
2.8 |
44% |
Shared |
Jeremy Shockey |
4.8 |
8.1 |
41% |
7.2 |
89% |
Starter/hurt |
Jerramy Stevens |
2.3 |
6.1 |
62% |
1.4 |
23% |
Shared/hurt |
TEs |
2003 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2004 Status |
Jed Weaver |
1.8 |
4.6 |
61% |
2.3 |
50% |
NS |
Boo Williams |
2.1 |
8.6 |
76% |
3.4 |
40% |
Shared |
Jason Witten |
2.0 |
4.8 |
58% |
8.4 |
175% |
Starter |
TEs |
2004 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2005 Status |
Ben Troupe |
1.9 |
3.8 |
50% |
4.4 |
116% |
Starter/hurt |
TEs |
2005 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2006 Status |
Adam Bergen |
1.9 |
3.13 |
50% |
1.22 |
39% |
Shared |
Chris Cooley |
3.1 |
8.14 |
47% |
6.84 |
84% |
Starter |
Total Sample |
2.67 |
5.98 |
54% |
4.26 |
74% |
|
|
Three of the five second half wonders that started the next year
were nearly as good as their previous year’s stretch run,
if not significantly better. Although two of these five tight
ends were injured for significant portions of their follow up
season, their level of production and games started were high
enough to include in this sample.
Last year, the Gut Check had Cooley as the only viable Second
Half Wonder at tight end.
Name |
Team |
Year |
2nd Half Avg. |
Projected 2006* |
Actual 2006 |
Projected Rank** |
Actual Rank |
Adam Bergen |
ARI |
2005 |
3.13 |
2.79 |
1.22 |
23rd |
52nd |
Chris Cooley |
WAS |
2005 |
8.14 |
7.24 |
6.84 |
3rd |
6th |
* 2006
projected fpts/gm based on attainment research described
above with 87% minimum attainment.
** Projected positional rank based on 2005's fpts/gm
totals. |
|
This year, the Gut Check projected the Second Half Wonders at
the average starter attainment percentage of 107.8%. The only
two viable candidates are listed below:
Last |
First |
1st Half 2006 |
2nd Half 2006 |
% |
Projected 2007
@107.8% |
Projected 2007 Rank |
Stevens |
Jerramy |
2.67 |
4.34 |
39% |
4.68 |
15th |
Davis |
Vernon |
3.23 |
5.04 |
36% |
5.44 |
11th |
|
Jerramy
Stevens leaves Seattle for Tampa, but he’ll at best split
time with incumbent Alex Smith. The Gut Check believes this projected
amount for the UW alum is a top end number for his 2007 performance,
barring an injury to Smith. On the other hand, Vernon
Davis will be the unquestioned starter heading into his second
season with the Niners. Davis’ projected 2007 stats place him
just outside of the top 10 tight ends. The Gut Check believes
Davis has a chance to produce at a much higher clip, because of
his elite physical talents and the fact he missed a portion of
his rookie year with injury. In contrast to Stevens, look for
Davis’ projected production to be more of a starting point for
this tight end with wide receiver speed and kick return man skills
after the catch.
Quarterbacks have the best follow up seasons when it comes to
attaining their second half numbers from the season before. As
mentioned last year, once football no longer feels like practicing
organic chemistry in pads, it makes sense a starting quarterback
that has made the adjustment to the NFL will continue to improve.
This goes for veterans changing teams—just to a lesser extent.
Second
Half Wonders: Quarterbacks |
QBs |
2002 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2003 Status |
Matt Hasselbeck |
9.7 |
26 |
63% |
20 |
77% |
Starter |
Brad Johnson |
15.2 |
20.39 |
25% |
18.6 |
91% |
Starter |
Michael Vick |
20 |
25.7 |
22% |
15.35 |
60% |
Hurt |
QBs |
2003 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2004 Status |
Donovan McNabb |
12.8 |
21.9 |
42% |
23.8 |
109% |
Starter |
QBs |
2004 |
% |
Next Yr |
Attainment% |
2005 Status |
Kerry Collins |
15 |
22.4 |
33% |
16.33 |
73% |
Starter |
Eli Manning |
7.5 |
12.3 |
39% |
18.6 |
151% |
Starter |
Carson Palmer |
13.5 |
20.4 |
34% |
20.6 |
101% |
Starter |
Total Sample |
12.28 |
20.57 |
40% |
19.66 |
96% |
|
|
Last year’s second half wonders at quarterback either began
the season as a back up (Kyle Boller) or soon ceded their position
to a rookie (Brad Johnson and Kurt Warner). Therefore the Gut
Check does not have any quarterbacks from 2006 added to the sample.
Therefore the sample remains the same as last year: Exactly two-thirds
of the second half wonders at QB had close to the same, or better,
follow up season. Two of the quarterbacks were first-year starters,
Eli Manning and Carson Palmer. Although Matt Hasselbeck and Kerry
Collins didn’t reach the desired attainment percentages,
their fantasy totals made them decent starters—especially
Hasselbeck. In fact half of the quarterbacks exceeded their second-half
numbers in the follow-up season and were averaging fantasy points
that made them quality #1 fantasy starters (Johnson and Manning),
if not outright studs at the position (McNabb and Palmer).
2006’s Second Half Wonders has more promise than last year
strictly for the fact three of the four candidates enter the 2007
season as the unquestioned starting quarterback.
Last |
First |
1st Half 2006 |
2nd Half 2006 |
% |
Projected 2007
@ 72% |
Projected 2007
@113% |
Projected Rank
@113% |
Romo |
Tony |
8.45 |
20.67 |
59% |
14.88 |
23.36 |
2nd |
Young |
Vince |
11.97 |
20.54 |
42% |
14.79 |
23.22 |
t-3rd |
Garrard |
David |
10.07 |
15.98 |
37% |
11.5 |
18.05 |
10th |
Leinart |
Matt |
13.07 |
17.56 |
26% |
12.64 |
19.84 |
7th |
|
Tony Romo
returns to a potent veteran lineup of skill players. The Gut Check
believes the projected stats for the Cowboys’ starter is overly
optimistic, but the figures should give a fantasy owner the idea
that Romo is a solid choice on draft day. He’ll likely be a bit
undervalued on draft day because he hasn’t demonstrated a consistent
level of productivity over the course of a season.
The sexy pick will be Vince
Young and he was as close to a one-man show in Tennessee as
one could get from a productive quarterback. The knock on Young
will be the fact he bolsters his scoring with his running skills,
but this will come from detractors that view Young in a similar
vein as Vick. Yours truly sees more parallels between Young and
either McNabb or his mentor, McNair. The big question will come
from the running game. Will Lendale White be able to pick up the
where Travis Henry left off? The Gut Check has his doubts. Regardless,
Young should still improve upon his 2006 campaign, but vaulting
to superstar fantasy status is also a bit too optimistic given
the Titans dearth of receiving talent at the time of writing this
article.
David Garrard
has never been a full-time starter and with Jacksonville still
committed to Byron Leftwich as their quarterback, he is nothing
more than a late round pick with potential value around mid-season.
The most intriguing pick might be Matt
Leinart. Arizona should generate an improved running game
under new coach Ken Whisenhunt, a former H-back in two offenses
known for their ground attack in the 80’s: Atlanta under Dan Henning
(Carolina’s current offensive coordinator) and Washington during
Joe Gibbs’ heyday. Leinart has the best pair trio of receivers
of the four candidates and is the best pure passer. The Cardinals
starter may not become the next Peyton Manning, but the Gut Check
believes he’ll be the most consistent of the four.
In conclusion, here’s what to consider with second half
wonders:
- Look for players that had a season where their second half
fantasy point per game average exceeded the first half by at
least 40%.
- Target the players that had this increase in production and
are slated to be a starter.
- If these starters remain healthy, you can reasonably expect
similar, if not significantly better, production out of these
players for the coming year.
Clearly there aren’t a lot of gems in this group, but it should
give you a more realistic way to project this season’s performance
of the dozen skill players that qualified as productive performers
down the stretch of 2006.
|