Fantasy Football Today - fantasy football rankings, cheatsheets, and information
A Fantasy Football Community!




Create An Account  |  Advertise  |  Contact      




 


Staff Writer
Email Doug

Doug's Articles

Preseason Schedule Analysis
AFC East & AFC North Breakdowns
7/28/09

AFC East: BUF | MIA | NE | NYJ
AFC North: BAL | CIN | CLE | PIT

Every owner wants to hit on the next big thing; that is no secret. But it infuriates me how so-called expert after so-called expert doesn't even mention the word "schedule" when it comes to projecting player performance. Somewhere along with player talent and age, team offensive philosophy and supporting cast, I believe schedule analysis – when used correctly – provides a huge advantage over the competition. Any veteran fantasy football owner knows it is nearly pointless to use last season's numbers as an indicator of how a defense will fare this season, which is a big reason I go to the trouble of analyzing defense like I did last week. It stands to reason that if teams like Kansas City and Denver will once again struggle on defense - even after all the changes both teams made - that I want to see them more often on my fantasy players' schedule than I do on someone else's. Likewise, why do I want any of my players facing Pittsburgh in the fantasy playoffs?

Before I continue, let's do a little Q&A to provide some insight as to why schedule analysis is a good thing:

Q: How many times this decade a RB from the current AFC North has finished among the top five fantasy RBs this decade in traditional, non-PPR scoring?
A: Twice. Once during Jamal Lewis' 2,000-yard season when he logged nearly 400 carries and once when Willie Parker exploded for 16 TDs in 2006.

Q: What is the most likely reason for the current AFC North's lack of success in that time?
A: How about the fact that the Bengals and Browns face the Steelers and Ravens four times every season while Baltimore and Pittsburgh face each other twice.

Q: How often has a RB from the current AFC or NFC West finished among the top five since 2000?
A: Twenty-one times! Taken one step further, 35 of the 45 top-five RB spots since 2000 have gone to backs whose teams went up against the AFC and/or the NFC West that season. Even more impressive, the top-scoring RB in fantasy football each season played at least four games against the AFC and/or NFC West.

In short, nearly half of the top five backs this decade could be found in two divisions and the reasons for their success are simple: 1) most of the "West RBs" (Marshall Faulk, LaDainian Tomlinson, Priest Holmes, etc.) were gifted three-down backs in very good offensive systems and 2) outside of San Diego and Seattle sporting good defenses for a few years here and there, when is the last time a team in the AFC/NFC West had a defense that could shut down an elite RB?

If I do nothing else this offseason (or get credit for nothing else in my fantasy writing career), I want to drive home the point that the schedule will quite often tell you what players to target and avoid on draft day. I use RBs in the above example because they are so important in fantasy football, but the truth of the matter is that fantasy owners need to realize the schedule is one of the more important reasons why a player at just about any position exploded onto the scene, had a career year or busted. Don't get me wrong, most of the factors mentioned above (player talent and age, team offensive philosophy and supporting cast) need to be in a player's favor to truly have a special season but, most of the time, players perform well because they consistently win their individual matchup, not because they were "due" or just entering their athletic prime. Once again, it takes a perfect storm of a number of factors for a player to enjoy a career year, but let it be known the quality of the opponent week in and week out is one of the more important ones to consider.

Over the next four weeks, I will be posting my game-by-game predictions, two divisions at a time. Bear in mind that while the final numbers are important, they are 15-game totals because most fantasy seasons have a Week 16 title game. For those unfamiliar with the way I project player stats and individual week-to-week consistency (or for those who need a refresher), please give my PSA: RB article a read for an introductory course in Preseason Schedule Analysis.

Much like any system that projects future performance, each year gives me the opportunity to tweak and hopefully improve the product. The biggest emphasis this season was to personalize each matchup. Before we begin, I feel it necessary to state that my projections are subject to change, but I will release my final projections and rankings in late August. However, the next few weeks should give all interested parties a pretty good idea of just how strongly I feel about a player's prospects for the upcoming season.

Perhaps more important than the final numbers for each player, though, are the highlighted matchups. Note that I have applied the green highlights (good matchups) to the players who I feel should take advantage of that matchup and the red highlights (bad matchups) to the ones that will be difficult - but not impossible - for that player. Only a handful of defenses merit bad matchups all over the board (the Steelers, Ravens, Bears, Jets and Patriots all qualify), however, just because a player’s box is "red" one week doesn't mean the player won't put up his usual numbers just as a "green" doesn't necessarily mean he will. Furthermore, one WR can have a "red" matchup but the rest of his team could be neutral or green. For instance, if the Raiders decide to put CB Nnamdi Asomugha on the opponent's #1 WR at all times as they have stated they may, it will qualify as a bad matchup only for the #1 WR, no the rest of the passing game. (In previous years, a matchup vs. Oakland meant each QB and WR was a "red" matchup.) Going forward, a QB, WR or TE player will only be considered positive or negative if I don't think he can win his individual matchup.

Note: The grey highlight in each team’s schedule reflects a road game.

AFC EAST

 Buffalo Bills
  Totals NE TB NO MIA CLE NYJ CAR HOU Bye TEN JAX MIA NYJ KC NE ATL
(Run)   3.9 4.2 4.1 4.3 4.3 3.8 4.4 4.3   4.1 4 4.3 3.8 4.9 3.9 4.6
(Pass)   6.2 7.4 6.7 7.2 7.2 6.5 6.3 7.2   6.5 7.2 7.2 6.5 7.5 6.2 7.1
                                   
T Edwards 3380 185 235 245 240 255 220 240 225   185 250 215 200 240 200 245
TD 19 0 2 2 1 3 0 1 2   0 1 1 1 2 1 2
INT 14 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0   3 0 1 1 0 1 1
                                   
M Lynch 885 SUS SUS SUS 60 90 50 80 85   40 70 75 85 110 55 85
Ru TD 8       1 1 0 1 0   0 1 0 1 2 0 1
Re Yards 240       20 25 20 15 20   15 25 15 20 20 15 30
Re TD 0       0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 34       3 4 3 1 3   2 4 2 3 2 3 4
                                   
F Jackson 485 65 80 60 35 20 25 15 35   20 15 25 15 30 25 20
Ru TD 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1   0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Re Yards 330 25 20 30 20 10 35 25 25   20 25 10 30 10 25 20
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 45 3 1 4 3 1 4 3 4   3 4 2 4 2 4 3
                                   
D Rhodes 280 25 35 20 15 15 20 25 15   15 20 15 20 15 10 15
Ru TD 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0   0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Re Yards 50 10 0 10 0 0 10 0 0   10 0 0 0 0 10 0
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 6 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0   2 0 0 0 0 0 0
                                   
L Evans 1020 40 85 70 90 85 45 75 80   50 100 50 75 60 45 70
Re TD 7 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1   0 1 0 1 0 0 1
Rec 74 4 4 6 7 6 3 5 6   4 6 3 5 4 4 7
                                   
T Owens 1055 55 85 80 60 105 55 65 70   60 55 85 40 110 45 85
Re TD 9 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1   0 0 1 0 2 0 1
Rec 79 6 5 7 4 6 5 6 6   3 4 6 3 7 5 6
                                   
J Reed 470 40 30 30 35 20 40 40 20   30 30 40 25 25 35 30
Re TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 43 4 3 1 3 2 2 2 2   4 4 3 3 2 5 3
                                   
S Nelson 215 15 15 25 15 10 15 20 10   0 15 15 10 15 25 10
Re TD 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Rec 24 2 1 3 2 1 1 3 1   0 3 2 1 1 2 1

The Bills don't figure to get off to the greatest of starts by facing what should once again be one of the tougher defenses in the league in the Patriots, especially since they won't have Marshawn Lynch. However, after New England, Trent Edwards & Co. should have some opportunity to put up some numbers as I don't expect the Bucs, Browns and Texans to be much better than average on defense before the bye, which may be a good time to sell high on Edwards as the schedule gets a bit more trying later in the year. Buffalo's biggest problem would appear to be its own division, which won't give it much of a break as the Jets, Pats and Dolphins should easily finish in the top half of the league in total defense.

A typical Bills' offense would show a lot more red than I have above, but there aren't a lot of teams in the league that will be able to go toe-to-toe with Terrell Owens, Lee Evans, Josh Reed, Fred Jackson and Lynch. Since Buffalo will be spending much of December in the elements, it's hard to pronounce this offense as an all-around fantasy power. The upside, though, is that most of this offense will be drafted as a #2 at their positions (as in QB2, RB2, WR2) rather than a #1. As long as Edwards steps up to the challenge - which he should - the Bills should be a fairly consistent offensive force this season.

 Miami Dolphins
Totals ATL IND SD BUF NYJ Bye NO NYJ NE TB CAR BUF NE JAX TEN HOU
(Run) 4.6 4.1 4.1 4.5 3.8   4.1 3.8 3.9 4.2 4.4 4.5 3.9 4 4.1 4.3
(Pass) 7.1 6.1 6.6 7.4 6.5   6.7 6.5 6.2 7.4 6.3 7.4 6.2 7.2 6.5 7.2
 
C Pennington 2905 235 205 200 205 170   230 180 195 200 155 215 160 195 165 195
TD 17 1 2 1 2 1   2 0 2 1 1 1 1 0 2 0
INT 11 0 1 2 0 1   0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 2 1
 
P White 365 25 0 35 15 20   30 45 20 65 0 25 10 45 0 30
TD 4 0 0 1 0 0   1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
INT 2 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Ru Yards 290 20 10 15 35 0   20 15 30 25 10 40 10 20 20 20
Ru TD 3 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
 
R Brown 1280 90 65 75 115 60   100 80 40 120 75 85 90 105 80 100
Ru TD 11 1 0 1 1 0   1 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 1
Re Yards 300 30 0 35 15 40   25 20 30 10 15 5 20 15 25 15
Re TD 2 0 0 0 1 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Rec 40 4 0 5 2 4   2 3 5 1 2 1 4 1 4 2
 
R Williams 290 20 15 25 35 15   20 10 25 10 20 15 15 10 20 35
Ru TD 2 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Re Yards 50 0 15 10 0 0   10 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 7 0 1 2 0 0   2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
 
T Ginn 770 60 65 35 70 35   60 55 45 70 30 55 30 45 40 75
Re TD 5 0 0 0 1 0   1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
Rec 61 3 4 3 5 3   4 6 3 4 4 7 2 5 3 5
 
G Camarillo 635 45 35 25 45 25   35 30 45 55 40 80 25 50 60 40
Re TD 2 0 1 0 0 0   1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 62 3 4 2 4 3   2 5 5 6 4 6 3 6 5 4
 
D Bess 480 30 50 30 25 30   40 25 20 60 25 40 40 25 25 15
Re TD 2 0 0 0 0 1   0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 36 3 3 4 2 2   3 2 2 2 1 3 4 1 3 1
 
A Fasano 425 45 20 50 20 30   45 20 40 15 30 10 20 40 15 25
Re TD 4 1 0 1 0 0   0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Rec 41 4 3 4 1 4   4 3 3 1 4 1 2 3 2 2
 
D Martin 290 25 20 15 30 10   15 30 15 35 0 25 25 20 0 25
Re TD 3 0 1 0 0 0   0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Rec 30 2 2 2 3 1   1 5 1 4 0 2 3 1 0 3

It's safe to say fantasy owners probably won't fall all over themselves to get anybody attached to the Dolphins' passing game. Chad Pennington's value will be sapped for a multitude of reasons, including the "Wildcat", the possibility of Chad Henne taking over at some point of the season and Miami's conservative offensive philosophy. Furthermore, when Cover 2 teams like Indy and Buffalo aren't limiting the passing numbers, the Dolphins will be faced with some of the more aggressive blitzing teams in the league like the Chargers and Jets (twice). Unfortunately, there just are not a lot of plus-matchups in which players like Ted Ginn can take advantage of this season. I've still predicted a modest increase in Ginn's numbers as he is the one true playmaker in the receiving corps, but his true coming-of-age season may not come until next season.

As for the running game, this will be one of several cases over the next four weeks where offensive philosophy, player talent and supporting cast (in this case, the run blocking) will outweigh the schedule to some degree. Ronnie Brown should finally assume the lead-back role in this offense, which should mean he will eclipse his previous career high of 242 carries (and 275 touches). Given the difficulty of his schedule, he could be in line for more down weeks than I have him down for, but I believe at age 27 and in the best shape of his career, this will be the year that he stays healthy and be the true focal point of this offense.

 New England Patriots
Totals BUF NYJ ATL BAL DEN TEN TB Bye MIA IND NYJ NO MIA CAR BUF JAX
(Run) 4.5 3.8 4.6 3.8 5 4.1 4.2   4.3 4.1 3.8 4.1 4.3 4.4 4.5 4
(Pass) 7.4 6.5 7.1 6.2 6.8 6.5 7.4   7.2 6.1 6.5 6.7 7.2 6.3 7.4 7.2
 
T Brady 3975 285 235 325 195 245 250 275   265 230 220 370 260 280 250 290
TD 32 3 1 3 1 3 1 4   3 0 1 3 2 3 1 3
INT 10 0 2 0 1 0 1 0   1 2 0 0 2 0 0 1
 
L Maroney 635 55 35 50 25 70 20 0   45 30 40 65 20 35 110 35
Ru TD 5 0 0 1 0 1 0 0   1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Re Yards 100 0 10 10 0 0 15 0   15 20 0 15 0 0 15 0
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 14 0 1 1 0 0 2 0   2 3 0 3 0 0 2 0
 
F Taylor 610 45 30 40 35 45 30 55   20 20 50 35 70 40 25 70
Ru TD 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 1   0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Re Yards 185 20 0 15 0 15 15 15   0 20 10 15 0 25 10 25
Re TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Rec 21 2 0 3 0 2 2 1   0 2 1 2 0 3 1 2
 
S Morris 385 20 25 15 25 20 55 25   35 45 10 0 40 10 35 25
Ru TD 7 1 0 1 0 0 1 0   1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0
Re Yards 105 10 0 25 0 15 0 10   0 10 0 10 15 0 0 10
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 13 1 0 3 0 2 0 2   0 1 0 1 2 0 0 1
 
K Faulk 210 10 0 15 0 10 15 25   25 50 20 15 0 10 0 15
Ru TD 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0   0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Re Yards 480 35 40 35 25 15 50 25   30 15 45 35 25 35 40 30
Re TD 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Rec 55 4 4 5 5 1 6 4   2 1 5 3 3 4 6 2
 
R Moss 1305 90 60 120 40 75 90 110   85 75 80 125 110 90 55 100
Re TD 15 2 0 2 0 1 1 2   0 0 1 2 2 1 0 1
Rec 91 7 4 8 3 4 6 8   6 5 6 10 8 7 3 6
 
W Welker 1200 85 105 70 85 95 45 65   90 65 40 100 90 75 105 85
Re TD 8 0 1 0 0 2 0 1   1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1
Rec 108 7 9 6 8 6 4 6   11 6 5 8 7 6 11 8
 
J Galloway 405 30 20 40 25 20 20 50   25 0 35 35 20 45 0 40
Re TD 4 0 0 1 1 0 0 1   0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Rec 27 1 2 1 2 1 3 4   2 0 3 2 1 2 0 3
 
B Watson 195 15 0 10 20 10 15 0   20 25 10 35 0 10 25 0
Re TD 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0   1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 23 2 0 1 2 1 2 0   3 4 1 3 0 1 3 0

For someone who is coming off knee surgery, Tom Brady won't have the benefit of a lot of easy matchups early on to regain the trust in his knee that he'll need to be successful once again this season. In fact, for a normal offense, easily half the schedule could be adorned in red. But as we know, very little is normal about the Patriots' offense, from their four-headed monster at RB to their relentless passing game. As such, I expect Brady to have his second-best season as a pro even though he may not settle in entirely until after the first month and even after considering that his pre-bye games aren't exactly pushovers. However, the schedule will lighten up in the second half and I expect Brady will regain full trust in his knee by midseason. Unlike most teams, the Patriots don't need to consider the intermediate passing game if they don't want to; they have a deep threat that requires a constant double team and a short-game threat that is essentially an extension of the running game. Even in his 12th season in the league, there are very few defensive backs or schemes that Moss can't outrun. Like Moss, Welker also has very few schemes that can contain him, but for a very different reason - his quickness and fearlessness over the middle.

Despite their top 10 finishes in fantasy points scored by the RB position in each of the past three seasons, the Patriots’ approach to spreading the wealth at RB is a fantasy nightmare. In my early projections, I have all four backs scoring 100+ points in PPR leagues, but none of them scoring more than 131. What's worse is there is no kind of predictable consistency, outside of Kevin Faulk possibly posting good receiving totals in games vs. the Ravens, Jets and Titans. I have a feeling HC Bill Belichick still wants Maroney to pull away from the pack and establish himself in the same fashion Corey Dillon and Antowain Smith have done in the past. But as we have seen lately, we can't count on that happening anymore as fantasy owners.

 New York Jets
Totals HOU NE TEN NO MIA BUF OAK MIA Bye JAX NE CAR BUF TB ATL IND
(Run) 4.3 3.9 4.1 4.1 4.3 4.5 4.9 4.3   4 3.9 4.4 4.5 4.2 4.6 4.1
(Pass) 7.2 6.2 6.5 6.7 7.2 7.4 6.9 7.2   7.2 6.2 6.3 7.4 7.4 7.1 6.1
 
M Sanchez 2915 210 130 215 225 175 225 165 220   185 190 165 245 200 205 160
TD 15 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 1   2 1 1 2 1 1 0
INT 13 1 0 1 2 0 1 0 1   1 0 1 2 1 0 2
 
T Jones 780 60 50 55 45 65 50 55 40   45 55 75 55 35 50 45
Ru TD 5 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0   1 0 0 0 0 1 0
Re Yards 230 15 20 20 15 10 20 10 15   10 15 15 20 10 15 20
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 29 2 3 3 2 1 3 1 1   1 2 3 2 2 1 2
 
L Washington 510 40 25 50 25 25 30 20 60   30 15 35 30 55 30 40
Ru TD 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1   0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Re Yards 385 30 25 25 35 20 25 10 30   30 40 20 15 25 30 25
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 49 4 4 2 3 3 2 2 4   5 6 1 2 3 4 4
 
S Greene 735 55 30 45 10 40 40 100 25   60 55 45 75 45 55 55
Ru TD 10 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1   0 1 1 1 1 0 1
Re Yards 20 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 0   0 0 0 10 0 0 0
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0   0 0 0 1 0 0 0
 
J Cotchery 895 55 40 60 75 55 80 25 85   35 70 50 100 70 65 30
Re TD 5 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1   0 0 0 1 0 1 0
Rec 71 4 4 6 5 3 6 2 7   4 5 4 8 6 4 3
C Stuckey/  
D Clowney 430 60 15 30 25 35 45 35 20   20 15 10 40 15 40 25
Re TD 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0   1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Rec 26 2 1 1 2 1 3 3 2   1 2 1 1 1 3 2
 
B Smith 255 10 10 20 25 10 30 15 30   20 25 15 15 0 20 10
Re TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 26 1 1 3 2 1 4 1 4   1 2 1 2 0 2 1
 
D Keller 700 40 20 55 50 45 25 65 40   70 25 55 45 80 35 50
Re TD 6 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0   1 0 1 0 1 0 0
Rec 65 3 2 4 6 7 3 7 3   4 2 6 5 7 2 4

According to my YPC projections from last week, the Jets will have the easiest schedule vs. the run of any AFC East team. However, that number is a bit skewed from the fact that New York will not face its own run defense, which I have projected as the best in the division. Either way, the Jets picked a fairly good year to decide to run the ball 37 times a game because the Patriots appear to be the only team stout enough to withstand that kind of onslaught on the ground. Much like HC Rex Ryan's old team - Baltimore - the best fantasy RB each week could be a revolving door as long as everyone stays healthy, although an injury to Thomas Jones or Shonn Greene will blow the door open for the other bruiser to have a potentially better year than the one Jones turned in last season. The Jets' final four games appear to be especially juicy matchups for the RBs, as only Indy in Week 16 could be a team that really clamp down on the run (and that would be assuming S Bob Sanders is healthy and the big rookie defensive linemen the Colts brought in are playing well).

As for the passing game, it wouldn't be overly surprising to me if Keller gives Jerricho Cotchery a run for his money to lead the team in receiving. Because most of the Jets' toughest competition this season vs. the pass will be from zone-based teams that will focus on keeping Cotchery out of the game, New York may find itself in zone-busting mode a lot with the swift-footed Dustin Keller. The key, as it usually is in the passing game, will be if the QB can take advantage of the attention the running game will attract. Sanchez will have to be money on third down - because the Jets will have a lot of them - and make teams pay for not doubling Cotchery or Keller. The big unknown is who the #2 WR will be on this team, but it's highly unlikely that player – Chansi Stuckey or David Clowney - makes a significant impact in this run-heavy offense. If the run works as well as it should, there will likely be no more than 15-18 completions to go around, with 75% of those catches going to Cotchery or Keller.

AFC NORTH

 Baltimore Ravens
Totals KC SD CLE NE CIN MIN Bye DEN CIN CLE IND PIT GB DET CHI PIT
(Run) 4.9 4.1 4.3 3.9 4 3.8   5 4 4.3 4.1 3.4 4 4.7 3.8 3.4
(Pass) 7.5 6.6 7.2 6.2 6.3 6.6   6.8 6.3 7.2 6.1 5.6 6.8 7.9 6.8 5.6
J Flacco 2555 195 185 185 160 135 225   140 190 160 130 145 205 190 155 155
TD 15 2 0 2 1 0 1   1 2 2 0 1 1 1 0 1
INT 11 0 2 0 1 1 0   0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 2
Ru Yards 125 5 0 15 0 20 10   5 10 0 0 15 10 25 10 0
Ru TD 2 0 0 0 0 0 0   1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
 
L McClain 860 80 40 60 50 70 35   50 40 100 25 35 75 90 50 60
Ru TD 9 1 0 2 0 1 0   1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1
Re Yards 150 15 20 10 0 15 15   0 20 10 0 15 10 0 0 20
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 20 2 3 1 0 2 3   0 3 1 0 2 1 0 0 2
 
R Rice 730 70 50 100 55 40 40   75 30 40 40 20 45 60 25 40
Ru TD 4 1 0 0 1 0 0   1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Re Yards 310 20 25 25 15 30 20   35 20 15 15 0 15 20 40 15
Re TD 2 0 0 0 0 0 0   1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 42 4 3 1 3 4 2   3 1 5 2 0 3 4 5 2
 
W McGahee 505 25 35 45 15 50 10   55 25 30 25 40 10 35 85 20
Ru TD 4 0 0 0 0 1 0   1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Re Yards 100 10 0 15 10 0 0   15 10 0 10 15 0 0 15 0
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 13 1 0 2 1 0 0   3 1 0 1 2 0 0 2 0
 
M Clayton 785 65 40 80 35 50 55   15 80 50 35 40 75 100 45 20
Re TD 5 1 0 1 0 0 0   0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Rec 58 4 3 3 4 5 4   1 6 4 3 3 5 8 3 2
 
D Williams 645 50 75 20 65 20 70   55 15 70 0 20 90 40 20 35
Re TD 3 0 0 1 1 0 0   0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 32 2 2 1 3 2 3   4 1 4 0 1 3 2 3 1
 
LJ Smith 345 25 15 0 25 20 40   20 35 15 35 25 15 15 10 50
Re TD 3 1 0 0 0 0 1   0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Rec 38 3 1 0 4 1 5   2 4 3 5 3 1 2 1 3
 
T Heap 220 10 10 35 10 0 25   0 10 0 35 30 0 15 25 15
Re TD 2 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Rec 19 1 1 0 1 0 3   0 1 0 4 5 0 1 1 1

It's just as well that Baltimore will use three RBs to carry the ground game this season because, quite frankly, I'm not sure I want any of them starting for me after Week 11. In Weeks 12-16, only Detroit offers any kind of respite from opponents I expect to be among the league leaders in rush defense. Two games against the Steelers (including fantasy championship week) in that time is frightening enough, but add in what should be a much-improved Packers defense in Week 13 at Lambeau Field and the Bears in Week 15 and I've seen enough. Up until that point, Baltimore has a fairly advantageous slate in which Le’Ron McClain and Ray Rice should be able to alternate fantasy RB2-type of games. Just let it be known that the schedule says that it would be smart to deal Baltimore players at some point shortly after Week 10 vs. Cleveland.

Unlike 2008 draft classmate Matt Ryan, I don't see Joe Flacco trending upward this season. The offense wasn't exactly fantasy-friendly to begin with and that was before Derrick Mason decided to retire. Even if Mason does return, the only player impacted from a fantasy perspective will be Mark Clayton and I don't see either player coming close to matching Mason's 80-1,037-5 line from last season. Combine that with the dreadful late-season schedule which suggests points and yards will be hard to come by - just as it will be the Ravens' RBs - and I find it hard to highly recommend any Baltimore offensive player with any confidence in 2009.

 Cincinnati Bengals
Totals DEN GB PIT CLE BAL HOU CHI Bye BAL PIT OAK CLE DET MIN SD KC
(Run) 5 4 3.4 4.3 3.8 4.3 3.8   3.8 3.4 4.9 4.3 4.7 3.8 4.1 4.9
(Pass) 6.8 6.8 5.6 7.2 6.2 7.2 6.8   6.2 5.6 6.9 7.2 7.9 6.6 6.6 7.5
 
C Palmer 3880 275 290 245 245 220 285 250   245 185 270 300 335 185 290 260
TD 26 2 1 2 2 1 2 2   2 0 2 3 3 1 2 1
INT 13 0 1 1 0 2 1 1   0 2 1 0 0 2 1 1
 
C Benson 1090 115 70 55 90 35 80 90   50 30 120 70 75 40 55 115
Ru TD 7 1 0 0 1 0 1 1   0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1
Re Yards 140 15 0 10 0 20 10 0   15 0 15 10 20 0 25 0
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 15 2 0 1 0 2 2 0   1 0 2 1 3 0 1 0
 
B Scott 560 30 25 25 45 25 35 20   35 40 50 30 60 25 55 60
Ru TD 4 0 1 0 1 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Re Yards 175 0 25 15 0 10 25 10   10 0 15 0 35 20 10 0
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 19 0 3 1 0 1 3 1   1 0 2 0 4 1 2 0
 
B Leonard 155 10 15 10 20 0 10 0   10 15 0 25 10 15 15 0
Ru TD 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
Re Yards 155 20 15 0 20 10 10 20   0 0 20 15 10 0 0 15
Re TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 17 3 1 0 3 1 2 2   0 0 1 2 1 0 0 1
 
C Ochocinco 1055 70 85 45 105 60 70 50   85 40 35 125 70 55 50 110
Re TD 8 0 1 0 1 0 1 0   1 0 0 2 0 1 0 1
Rec 74 4 6 3 7 4 5 4   6 4 2 8 6 4 3 8
 
L Coles 1040 75 100 60 50 85 40 60   65 55 80 55 110 60 75 70
Re TD 6 1 0 0 1 1 0 0   1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Rec 88 6 7 6 5 7 3 5   5 8 6 5 10 3 8 4
 
C Henry 810 55 40 70 25 35 100 75   35 55 75 35 65 20 80 45
Re TD 8 1 0 2 0 0 1 1   0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
Rec 45 3 3 4 1 2 4 4   2 3 3 3 4 1 6 2
 
A Caldwell 250 20 25 30 10 0 20 25   25 0 20 20 25 15 15 0
Re TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Rec 24 3 3 2 1 0 2 3   2 0 2 2 2 1 1 0
 
C Coffman 255 20 0 15 35 0 10 10   10 35 10 40 0 15 35 20
Re TD 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Rec 25 2 0 0 3 0 1 1   1 4 1 5 0 1 5 1

With every key offensive player happy, healthy and focused for the first time in years, Cincinnati should challenge even the best of defenses in 2009. Even better, for the first time in what seems like ages, the Bengals' schedule plays out about as well as it could have, outside of the obvious four combined meetings with the Ravens and Steelers. Their Week 8 bye breaks up three games that rival the toughest three-game stretch any team will play this season (home games vs. Chicago and Baltimore in Weeks 7&9 before a Week 10 road affair in Pittsburgh.) While that mid-season stretch is brutal, the good news is that the early and late part of the schedule plays out pretty nicely. Denver, by all accounts, will struggle mightily on defense this season and should allow Cincinnati to gain some much-needed early confidence in what the Bengals hope will be the most balanced offense they have presented in years. Green Bay will still be transitioning to Dom Capers' zone-blitz schemes in Week 2, the same kind Cincy will see in Week 3 at home vs. Pittsburgh.

After the second Steeler meeting in Week 10, the Bengals should be set up for a great final six-week flurry, especially in the passing game. Only the Chargers in Week 15 have the personnel necessary to capably match up with the Bengals' top three WRs, but given their struggles against the TE in 2008, perhaps that will be one game in which the addition of rookie TE Chase Coffman will prove helpful. Carson Palmer & Co. should be a joy to own all season long, but especially in the final third of the campaign. A six-pack of games against the Ravens (twice), Steelers (twice), Vikings and Bears figure to diffuse any shot of a Bengal running back making a charge toward a league rushing crown or top-ten finish among fantasy backs, but a renewed emphasis on the running game should make Cedric Benson a pretty serviceable fantasy RB2. If last season was any indication, he'll contribute more than people expect in the passing game and a Week 16 home matchup vs. the Chiefs sure looks promising against a defense that shouldn't be much better against the run than it was last season.

 Cleveland Browns
Totals MIN DEN BAL CIN BUF PIT GB CHI Bye BAL DET CIN SD PIT KC OAK
(Run) 3.8 5 3.8 4 4.5 3.4 4 3.8 3.8 4.7 4 4.1 3.4 4.9 4.9
(Pass) 6.6 6.8 6.2 6.3 7.4 5.6 6.8 6.8   6.2 7.9 6.3 6.6 5.6 7.5 6.9
 
B Quinn 2450 170 215 160 205 235 100   220 225 200 200 140 225 155
TD 15 1 1 1 1 2 0   1 2 1 2 0 2 1
INT 13 1 0 3 1 0 2   1 0 1 2 1 0 1
 
D Anderson 435 50 175 210  
TD 3 0 1 2  
INT 4 1 2 1  
 
J Lewis 785 65 55 40 55 80 35 55 25   65 45 50 30 50 60 75
Ru TD 6 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0   1 0 0 0 1 0 1
Re Yards 145 15 10 0 20 10 15 0 15   15 0 10 20 0 15 0
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 19 2 1 0 3 1 2 0 2   2 0 1 3 0 2 0
 
J Harrison 630 40 75 25 35 45 20 40 50   25 70 40 45 20 55 45
Ru TD 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0   0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Re Yards 300 25 30 15 0 35 20 20 25   15 25 0 35 15 20 20
Re TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Rec 38 3 4 2 0 2 3 3 4   3 2 0 5 2 3 2
 
B Edwards 900 60 45 60 80 75 30 55 100   60 85 50 40 55 80 25
Re TD 5 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1   0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Rec 63 5 4 3 6 5 1 5 8   4 5 3 4 3 4 3
 
B Robiskie 760 35 65 20 70 50 35 65 55   20 65 60 50 60 50 60
Re TD 5 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1   0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Rec 58 3 4 1 4 5 2 5 3   2 6 5 3 4 6 5
 
M Massaquoi 430 15 30 40 20 65 20 15 0   70 20 55 25 0 20 35
Re TD 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0   1 0 1 0 0 0 0
Rec 28 1 3 4 2 4 1 1 0   3 1 4 1 0 1 2
 
M Rucker 350 20 35 25 15 0 30 20 15   40 30 25 30 10 40 15
Re TD 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Rec 34 1 3 2 1 0 4 1 2   4 2 3 4 1 5 1

It's a shame when good fantasy playoff matchups are wasted on bad teams. The Browns face the Chiefs and Raiders in Weeks 15-16, but this offense is enough of a mess right now that it may not be able to give fantasy owners enough production to take advantage. First off, this season is probably Jamal Lewis' swan song in terms of being any kind of fantasy asset; the main question will be if his career workload will finally catch up to him in Week 1 or Week 10. Then there is the case of Jerome Harrison, who may sap just about any kind of remaining value Lewis has left. The only breaks Lewis and Harrison may catch early in the season are that Minnesota may be without the "Williams Wall" in Week 1 and that Cincinnati may not meet my expectations as an above-average defense this fall. If the Bengals do meet that expectation, however, all six division games will be difficult for the Browns to get anything going on the ground. Throw in the Bears, Packers and Chargers and, all of the sudden, 60% of Cleveland's "running schedule" is against stout run defenses.

The news for the passing game isn't much better. I don't believe Cleveland has a matchup all season long which, on the surface, is one its passing game can feast on. Games against Denver and Detroit look appealing at first, but each game is on the road and both the Broncos (Champ Bailey) and the Lions (new HC Jim Schwartz has better personnel and won't stand for the number of blown coverages that Rod Marinelli did) have compelling reasons as to why the Browns could struggle in those games as well. Braylon Edwards is bound to have a productive game or two, but since this offense will be a grind-it-out offense to begin with, that may be his ceiling. Brian Robiskie should be as productive as any rookie receiver this season because he is already the most reliable receiver the team has, so even though his YPC won't be all that high, he’ll be a decent play in PPR leagues. Perhaps if Martin Rucker proves he is a carbon-copy of Kellen Winslow, this passing game will flourish more than I am letting on in this article. But I'm not holding my breath on that happening.

 Pittsburgh Steelers
Totals TEN CHI CIN SD DET CLE MIN Bye DEN CIN KC BAL OAK CLE GB BAL
(Run) 4.1 3.8 4 4.1 4.7 4.3 3.8   5 4 4.9 3.8 4.9 4.3 4 3.8
(Pass) 6.5 6.8 6.3 6.6 7.9 7.2 6.6   6.8 6.3 7.5 6.2 6.9 7.2 6.8 6.2
 
B Roethlisberger 2955 210 210 245 165 210 230 200   145 210 170 120 250 215 215 160
TD 19 1 1 2 1 2 2 1   0 1 2 0 2 2 1 1
INT 11 1 1 2 0 0 1 0   0 1 0 2 1 0 1 1
Ru Yards 120 10 0 15 15 0 10 0   15 0 10 0 20 15 0 10
Ru TD 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
 
W Parker 1085 80 65 75 90 60 100 50   120 90 100 35 60 60 45 55
Ru TD 7 1 0 0 1 0 1 0   2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
Re Yards 110 0 0 10 0 20 0 15   0 10 15 0 15 0 25 0
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 15 0 0 1 0 3 0 2   0 1 3 0 2 0 3 0
 
R Mendenhall 740 30 45 45 25 50 55 45   60 50 35 60 80 60 70 30
Ru TD 6 0 1 0 0 1 0 1   1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0
Re Yards 200 15 25 15 30 0 25 10   10 0 10 15 0 25 10 10
Re TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Rec 22 2 3 1 4 0 2 1   1 0 1 2 0 3 1 1
 
H Ward 870 70 50 80 50 45 80 65   40 65 30 65 25 80 55 70
Re TD 6 0 0 1 0 0 1 1   0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1
Rec 75 7 4 8 4 5 5 6   4 3 3 6 3 6 6 5
 
S Holmes 1010 65 75 75 85 100 70 45   45 65 65 25 105 55 90 45
Re TD 6 0 1 0 1 1 0 0   0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
Rec 61 4 5 6 5 3 4 3   3 4 4 1 5 4 8 2
 
L Sweed 415 40 25 30 0 20 35 20   40 35 50 0 65 25 20 10
Re TD 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 0   0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 26 2 1 3 0 2 2 1   3 2 1 0 3 3 2 1
 
H Miller 350 20 35 35 0 25 20 45   10 35 0 15 40 30 15 25
Re TD 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0   0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Rec 34 2 4 3 0 3 1 4   1 3 0 2 3 2 3 3

Let 2008 be a reminder to each of us: a team needs only one dominant unit to make a Super Bowl run. There was nothing particularly special about the Steelers' running game for most of last season and the passing game wasn't much better than average in terms of total yards or efficiency. Heck, Ben Roethlisberger finished a mere 24th in QB rating in 2008! But when one team turns in the best total defense effort (3,795 yards) since the 1991 Philadelphia Eagles (3,549), the rest of the team doesn't need to play at an All-Pro level. With that said, Pittsburgh's offense greatly benefits from the fact it doesn't have to face its own defense twice a year and, as such, has a slate that it could be moderately productive against in 2009. Considering that four of the five starters on the offensive line were in their first seasons at the positions in 2008, the Steelers' ground game should get a fair boost in productivity this season. Also, trading in four NFC East games for four AFC West opponents also figures to help in that regard as well. As a result, the main question for fantasy owners with Pittsburgh's ground game shouldn't be whether or not it will be productive, but who will be the one producing? Willie Parker believes he has the speed and acceleration back that made him such a great back a few seasons ago while Rashard Mendenhall will be primed to prove he is ready to be the next great Steeler RB. Barring injury, I think Parker gets the better end of a 60-40 split and gives his owners one more 1,000-yard season before Mendenhall evens things out in 2010 and claims the job for himself in 2011.

As for the passing game, Roethlisberger's fantasy effectiveness will be determined as much by the running game as it will be by his ability to absorb another 40-plus sacks. At some point, Big Ben's size will not be enough to save the day after the defense reaches him 5-6 times and knocks him down 10-15 more times. Much like the running game, the passing game only has a handful of below-average matchups. Unfortunately, as long as the Steelers defense continues to hold opponents to around 14-15 points per game, the urgency to turn Hines Ward and Santonio Holmes into the 2009 version of Stallworth and Swann won't be all that high. In short, Ward and Holmes will once again be solid WR2 options, but should not be counted on for WR1 production.