| NFC East: DAL | NYG | PHI 
              | WAS
 NFC North: CHI 
              | DET | GB | MIN
 
 With two weeks of PSAs under our belts, hopefully each of you has 
              had a chance to dissect the AFC. Two weeks ago, we discussed the 
              AFC East and AFC North. 
              Last week, it was time to take on the other half of the AFC – 
              the South and the West. 
              And before that, we had a chance to project the defensive 
              effectiveness of each team as well.
 Without a doubt, this week represents the toughest set of projections 
                I will attempt during this four-part series. If it is not the 
                RB situations that exist in the backfields of the Cowboys, Giants 
                and Redskins, then it is trying to figure out just how much Mike 
                Martz will change the landscape in Chicago or predicting whether 
                or not Brett Favre will report after training camp, during the 
                season or not at all. As I have in each of the first two PSAs, allow me to clear up 
                a couple of misconceptions about my schedule analysis approach 
                right away:
 
                 this is not a strength of schedule article that uses 2009 
                  results to predict 2010 and
 
 the schedule contributes to the projection of a player in 
                  this system, but it is far from the only determining factor 
                  I use.
               This is the third of four straight articles in which I will be 
                posting my game-by-game predictions, two divisions at a time. 
                Bear in mind that while the final numbers are important, they 
                are 15-game totals because most fantasy seasons have a Week 16 
                title game. For those unfamiliar with the way I project player 
                stats and individual week-to-week consistency (or for those who 
                need a refresher), please give this article a read for an introductory 
                course in Preseason Schedule Analysis.
 Much like any system that projects future performance, each year 
                gives me the opportunity to tweak and hopefully improve the product. 
                After making the ability to personalize each matchup my focus 
                last season, I hope to add volatility to the mix in 2010. By "volatility", 
                I mean: 1) accessing whether my projection represents the ceiling 
                or floor for a given player to operate in this season and 2) understanding 
                that at least one-third of the teams will make a QB change at 
                some point and about the same percentage of NFL starting RBs will 
                not make it through the 16-game schedule (only 19 RBs with more 
                than 100 carries played all 16 games last season). As such, I 
                will judiciously add injury layoffs to players who I feel are 
                significant injury risks. I also feel it necessary to state that 
                my projections are subject to change. Fear not, however, as I 
                will release my final projections and rankings in late August. 
                However, the next few weeks should give all interested parties 
                a pretty good idea of just how strongly I feel about a player's 
                prospects for the upcoming season.
 
 Perhaps more important than the final numbers for each player, 
                though, are the highlighted matchups. Note that I have applied 
                the green highlights (good matchups) to the players who I feel 
                should take advantage of that matchup and the red highlights (bad 
                matchups) to the ones that will be difficult - but not impossible 
                - for that player. Only a handful of defenses merit bad matchups 
                all over the board (the Steelers, Packers, Jets and Bengals all 
                qualify for the most part this year), however, just because a 
                player’s box is "red" one week doesn't mean the 
                player won't put up his usual numbers just as a "green" 
                doesn't necessarily mean he will. Furthermore, one WR can have 
                a "red" matchup but the rest of his team could be neutral 
                or green. For instance, when the Jets put CB Darrelle Revis on 
                the opponent's #1 WR, it will qualify as a bad matchup only for 
                the #1 WR, not necessarily for the rest of the passing game. Therefore, 
                a QB, WR or TE will only be considered positive/negative if I 
                don't think he can win his individual matchup.
 
 Before we dive into the projections, let me revisit the volatility 
                I spoke of earlier. In the blue vertical column to the right of 
                my projection, I will place a sign (explained below) as to how 
                much upside or downside a player has this season. Here is the 
                key I will be using over the next four weeks, with no sign by 
                a player’s name suggesting I feel I am projecting the player 
                accurately:
 
 (^) - Projection represents 
                the player’s floor; he has significant upside.(+) - Projection may be selling 
                the player short; he has some upside.
 (-) - Projection may be overselling 
                the player; he is a slight risk.
 (!) – Projection represents 
                the player’s ceiling; he is a significant risk.
 
 Note: The grey 
                highlight in each team’s schedule reflects a road game. NFC EAST 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Dallas Cowboys |  
 |  | Totals |  | WAS | CHI | HOU | bye | TEN | MIN | NYG | JAX | GB | NYG | DET | NO | IND | PHI | WAS | ARI |  
 | (Run) |  |  | 8.2 | 8.3 | 7.8 |  | 7.8 | 9.4 | 8.3 | 6.7 | 9.4 | 8.3 | 6.4 | 7.4 | 7.6 | 8 | 8.2 | 8.5 |  
 | (Pass) |  |  | 7.4 | 8.3 | 7.5 |  | 7.5 | 8.2 | 8.9 | 7.6 | 8.3 | 8.9 | 5.8 | 7.8 | 8.8 | 8.2 | 7.4 | 7.4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Tony Romo | 4370 | + | 280 | 340 | 285 |  | 265 | 310 | 285 | 340 | 225 | 275 | 325 | 290 | 250 | 290 | 310 | 300 |  
 | TD | 29 |  | 1 | 3 | 3 |  | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 |  
 | INT | 11 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 | Ru Yards | 150 |  | 15 | 10 | 5 |  | 0 | 15 | 25 | 0 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 15 |  
 | Ru TD | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Marion Barber | 850 |  | 70 | 55 | 90 |  | 40 | 40 | 100 | 35 | INJ | 25 | 50 | 80 | 100 | 40 | 50 | 75 |  
 | Ru TD | 8 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | INJ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 | Re Yards | 170 |  | 20 | 5 | 15 |  | 0 | 10 | 25 | 10 | INJ | 15 | 0 | 20 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 25 |  
 | Re TD | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 22 |  | 2 | 1 | 2 |  | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | INJ | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Felix Jones | 730 | - | 50 | 35 | 65 |  | 75 | 30 | 35 | INJ | INJ | 50 | 80 | 55 | 35 | 115 | 65 | 40 |  
 | Ru TD | 5 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  
 | Re Yards | 240 |  | 15 | 15 | 30 |  | 15 | 15 | 10 | INJ | INJ | 10 | 20 | 25 | 5 | 45 | 25 | 10 |  
 | Re TD | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 27 |  | 2 | 1 | 3 |  | 2 | 2 | 1 | INJ | INJ | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Tashard Choice | 415 | + | 15 | 25 | 10 |  | 35 | 15 | 5 | 60 | 75 | 60 | 40 | 15 | 25 | 5 | 15 | 15 |  
 | Ru TD | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Re Yards | 110 |  | 15 | 10 | 0 |  | 5 | 10 | 0 | 20 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 15 | 5 |  
 | Re TD | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 16 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Miles Austin | 1250 |  | 80 | 110 | 85 |  | 55 | 70 | 85 | 120 | 35 | 75 | 125 | 80 | 55 | 90 | 75 | 110 |  
 | Re TD | 8 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  
 | Rec | 86 |  | 5 | 8 | 6 |  | 3 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 5 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Roy Williams | 490 | - | 35 | 45 | 20 |  | 35 | 55 | 35 | 25 | 50 | 20 | 55 | 30 | 30 | INJ | 35 | 20 |  
 | Re TD | 3 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 35 |  | 2 | 3 | 2 |  | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | INJ | 3 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Dez Bryant | 725 |  | 25 | 40 | 50 |  | 85 | 40 | 35 | 40 | 35 | 85 | 25 | 55 | 60 | 35 | 60 | 55 |  
 | Re TD | 5 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 | Rec | 55 |  | 2 | 3 | 5 |  | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Patrick Crayton | 255 |  | 10 | 15 | 20 |  | 0 | 15 | 40 | 15 | 30 | 0 | 10 | 25 | 15 | 30 | 10 | 20 |  
 | Re TD | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 23 |  | 1 | 1 | 2 |  | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Jason Witten | 1015 | + | 80 | 90 | 65 |  | 60 | 80 | 55 | 100 | 45 | 65 | 75 | 40 | 55 | 75 | 85 | 45 |  
 | Re TD | 8 |  | 1 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  
 | Rec | 88 |  | 6 | 8 | 6 |  | 5 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Martellus Bennett | 115 |  | 0 | 10 | 0 |  | 10 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 5 | 10 |  
 | Re TD | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 12 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  |  Run: Until the day Dallas does 
                us all a favor and names a clear-cut starter at RB, fantasy owners 
                are left with either tag-teaming Barber and Jones on their fantasy 
                teams (thereby filling up two starting spots on your roster each 
                week) and hoping both players don’t succumb to injury (a 
                likely occurrence) OR they can avoid the situation and watch the 
                duo combine for over 2,000 total yards on an offense that should 
                be among the best in the league. In other words, my advice would 
                be to make sure you have draft both of them or avoid them entirely. 
                The season begins with three neutral matchups, although the first 
                one comes against division rival Washington, which almost always 
                makes for good TV. Chicago, Houston and Tennessee (Weeks 2, 3 
                and 5) each have the potential to give the Dallas rushing attack 
                fits, but it is hard to imagine the Cowboys not being in a position 
                to pound away against each of those defenses late in the game. 
               The most difficult portion of the running schedule begins in 
                Week 6 in Minnesota and doesn’t get much better the following 
                week in a home game vs. the Giants. The Jags possess the start 
                of a solid run defense up the middle, but lack the depth and safety 
                play needed to keep Barber and Jones in check all game long. The 
                tough stretch ends with consecutive road games against the Packers 
                and Giants before letting up considerably in home dates vs. Detroit 
                and New Orleans. The final quarter of the slate is neutral matchup-wise, 
                although a Week 13 road game in Indianapolis may force the Cowboys 
                to abandon the run game early in order to keep up with the Colts’ 
                offense on the scoreboard. Jones is a solid bet once again vs. 
                Philly in Week 14 – the same defense that had no answer 
                for him two straight weeks last season in convincing Dallas victories. 
                Wrapping up the fantasy schedule, it is notable that each of the 
                teams Dallas faces during the final two weeks of fantasy playoffs 
                (Redskins and Cardinals) each will play a 3-4 defense and both 
                should be league average or better at stuffing the run. 
 Pass: Assuming Bryant’s ankle 
                injury early in training camp isn’t a sign of things to 
                come, the Cowboys should have more than enough weapons to overcome 
                just about every difficult matchup they face this season. For 
                example, the Redskins and Bears (Weeks 1-2) are more than capable 
                defenses that should be able to pressure the QB and play respectably 
                on the back end of the defense, but neither defense will have 
                an answer for Austin, Bryant AND Witten. Houston (Week 3) should 
                probably be given a green as well as Brian Cushing will be missed 
                – this pre-bye stretch should serve as a springboard to 
                what could easily a career fantasy season for Witten. (In fact, 
                Witten doesn’t face a worthy opponent until Week 9.) The 
                fun continues after the bye for Romo against a young and vulnerable 
                Titans secondary (once you get past CB Cortland Finnegan) and 
                a Vikings’ run defense that will force the Cowboys to throw 
                all day long in all likelihood. The Giants’ contests (Week 7) could easily be a carbon 
                copy of the Vikings’ game if DC Perry Fewell gets as much 
                out of his players as I expect, but the passing game should get 
                some relief the next week against the highly questionable pass 
                rush of the Jags. The hardest part of the fantasy slate comes 
                over the next two games (Weeks 9-10) on the road against the highly-effective 
                blitzing defenses of the Packers and Giants. The Cowboys catch 
                a break the following week in a home tilt vs. a suspect Lions 
                pass defense but must face another blitz-happy defense like New 
                Orleans in Week 12. Indianapolis (Week 13) should represent a 
                bonanza of fantasy points, but playing the Colts on the road often 
                has the opposite effect for owners counting on passing yards and 
                TDs. The Cowboys face the Eagles for the first time all season 
                in Week 14 before wrapping the season with fantasy playoff matchups 
                vs. the Redskins and the Cardinals. Each team will play a 3-4 
                defense and provide at least one edge rusher who will attempt 
                to terrorize RT Marc Columbo, who will need to prove his health 
                all season long after being rushed back last season from injury 
                and performing badly in the team’s playoff loss to Minnesota.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | New York Giants |  
 |  | Totals |  | CAR | IND | TEN | CHI | HOU | DET | DAL | bye | SEA | DAL | PHI | JAX | WAS | MIN | PHI | GB |  
 | (Run) |  |  | 5.8 | 7.6 | 7.8 | 8.3 | 7.8 | 6.4 | 8.8 |  | 7.5 | 8.8 | 8 | 6.7 | 8.2 | 9.4 | 8 | 9.4 |  
 | (Pass) |  |  | 7.1 | 8.8 | 7.5 | 8.3 | 7.5 | 5.8 | 7.8 |  | 8 | 7.8 | 8.2 | 7.6 | 7.4 | 8.2 | 8.2 | 8.3 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Eli Manning | 3675 |  | 230 | 235 | 310 | 240 | 300 | 230 | 235 |  | 205 | 235 | 270 | 255 | 175 | 290 | 280 | 185 |  
 | TD | 24 |  | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 |  | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |  
 | INT | 13 |  | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Brandon Jacobs | 1000 | + | 115 | 85 | 50 | 65 | 70 | 90 | 70 |  | INJ | 85 | 60 | 45 | 55 | 60 | 85 | 65 |  
 | Ru TD | 10 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | INJ | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 | Re Yards | 100 |  | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 15 |  | INJ | 5 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 10 |  
 | Re TD | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 17 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |  | INJ | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Ahmad Bradshaw | 885 | + | 100 | 60 | 80 | 50 | 55 | 80 | 45 |  | 75 | 40 | 75 | 100 | INJ | 35 | 55 | 35 |  
 | Ru TD | 5 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Re Yards | 275 |  | 25 | 15 | 45 | 0 | 20 | 15 | 15 |  | 25 | 15 | 25 | 5 | INJ | 15 | 15 | 40 |  
 | Re TD | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 | Rec | 25 |  | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 |  | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | INJ | 2 | 1 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Danny Ware | 125 |  | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 |  | 35 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 5 | 10 | 10 |  
 | Ru TD | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Re Yards | 75 |  | 0 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 10 | 0 | 5 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 5 | 0 |  
 | Re TD | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 11 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Steve Smith | 1095 |  | 45 | 55 | 80 | 75 | 110 | 65 | 80 |  | 75 | 60 | 75 | 80 | 60 | 110 | 75 | 50 |  
 | Re TD | 6 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 88 |  | 4 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 10 | 5 | 7 |  | 6 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 3 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Hakeem Nicks | 1000 | + | 70 | 50 | 105 | 45 | 75 | 65 | 75 |  | 50 | 70 | 90 | 60 | 45 | 100 | 50 | 50 |  
 | Re TD | 7 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  
 | Rec | 71 |  | 4 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 6 |  | 3 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Mario Manningham | 470 |  | 35 | 75 | 50 | 60 | INJ | INJ | 20 |  | 35 | 50 | 0 | 40 | 20 | 25 | 35 | 25 |  
 | Re TD | 3 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | INJ | INJ | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 25 |  | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | INJ | INJ | 1 |  | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Ramses Barden | 180 | ^ | 10 | 5 | 0 | 15 | 35 | 20 | 0 |  | 0 | 30 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 15 | 30 | 0 |  
 | Re TD | 3 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 14 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 |  | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Kevin Boss | 390 |  | 35 | 25 | 20 | 30 | 25 | 55 | 10 |  | 10 | 5 | 50 | 30 | 20 | 20 | 45 | 10 |  
 | Re TD | 4 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 37 |  | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 |  | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Travis Beckum | 90 |  | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 25 | 10 | 20 |  | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 |  
 | Re TD | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 7 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  |  Note: It is being widely reported that Jacobs is in competition 
              with Bradshaw for the starting job, although unlike other RB “competitions”, 
              the only competition is for the rushing yards. Jacobs will remain 
              the goal-line back as long as he is healthy.
 Run: 
                For those owners looking for an opportunity to ride a player or 
                two to get through the first third of the season in hopes of bringing 
                home a bounty before the schedule gets difficult, look no further 
                than Jacobs and Bradshaw. The Giants catch a huge break in the 
                first quarter of the season, drawing three of their first four 
                games at home and getting to start against the defense I feel 
                will be the worst run-stopping team this season in Carolina. Weeks 
                2-3 could each feature worthy run-stopping defenses, but if New 
                York shows the brute force on the offensive line and Jacobs doesn’t 
                get hurt early like he did last season, neither the Colts nor 
                Titans should be able to withstand a full game of the Giants’ 
                backfield. Houston (Week 5) will be another league-average run-stopping 
                defense that will just be getting back OLB Brian Cushing after 
                his four-game suspension. Detroit (Week 6) is yet another opportunity 
                for the Giants to pound away at a below-average defense, although 
                it would be foolish to expect the Lions to be anywhere near as 
                pathetic stopping the run this season as they were in 2009. Dallas 
                finally ends the six-game run of 4-3 defenses in Week 7, but the 
                Cowboys and their 3-4 defensive scheme is hardly a mystery to 
                their hated rivals. After the Week 8 bye, the Giants head up to Seattle and its decided 
                home-field advantage at Qwest Field before facing the Cowboys 
                for the second time in four weeks in Week 10 – this time 
                at home. Philadelphia (Week 11) checks in as the fourth consecutive 
                team that should give the Giants’ run game a pretty serious 
                challenge, be it due to talent or home-field advantage. Jacksonville 
                (Week 12) could also be a stout run defense if its DT tandem of 
                Terrance Knighton and Tyson Alualu has gelled by then, but I fear 
                the Jags’ safety play will haunt them vs. Bradshaw’s 
                game-breaking speed. And the last quarter (Weeks 13-16) of the 
                fantasy season does New York no favors either – particularly 
                the fantasy playoffs – as the Giants face the two best run 
                defenses in the league (in my estimation) in Weeks 14 and 16 with 
                a talented division opponent sandwiched in between. All in all, 
                I would not want to have to rely on either Giants’ RB in 
                December.
 Pass: I expect New York to return 
                to its roots as a mauling, physical run team that will lean heavily 
                on Jacobs, Bradshaw and the defense in 2010. However, last year 
                proved Manning can post some significant fantasy numbers when 
                necessary and HC Tom Coughlin has stated this offseason he’ll 
                continue to put more on Manning’s plate as long as he is 
                up to the challenge. As mentioned above in the “run” 
                section, Manning & Co. kick off the year facing six straight 
                4-3 defenses – none of which should be as good as the defense 
                the Giants will practice against. Manning, Smith and Nicks should 
                all reap the benefits during this time, as only the Colts and 
                Bears should provide any resistance, provided New York doesn’t 
                choose to feature the run in those games. Again, just as I mentioned 
                in the above paragraph, the schedule takes a turn for the worst 
                in Week 7 when the Giants visit Dallas, although it should be 
                noted that recent New York-Dallas games have been wildly unpredictable 
                contests. Following the bye, an improved Seahawks secondary at home could 
                rattle the Giants’ receiving corps in Week 9. The Giants 
                then take another crack against the Cowboys’ stout blitzing 
                defense again in Week 10 before they get their first look of the 
                season against the equally aggressive Eagles’ blitz the 
                next week. The pass schedule lightens up ever so slightly over 
                the next two weeks in home games vs. the Jags and Redskins, but 
                wraps up in a terrible way during the fantasy playoffs. Minnesota’s 
                run defense may force the Giants to pass all day in the Metrodome, 
                but the elements may be a factor (as will the defenses) in Weeks 
                15 and 16 against the complex blitz schemes of the Eagles and 
                Packers.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Philadelphia Eagles |  
 |  | Totals |  | GB | DET | JAX | WAS | SF | ATL | TEN | bye | IND | WAS | NYG | CHI | HOU | DAL | NYG | MIN |  
 | (Run) |  |  | 9.4 | 6.4 | 6.7 | 8.2 | 8.9 | 6.6 | 7.8 |  | 7.6 | 8.2 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 7.8 | 8.8 | 8.3 | 9.4 |  
 | (Pass) |  |  | 8.3 | 5.8 | 7.6 | 7.4 | 7.9 | 7.7 | 7.5 |  | 8.8 | 7.4 | 8.9 | 8.3 | 7.5 | 7.8 | 8.9 | 8.2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Kevin Kolb | 3815 | - | 235 | 365 | 310 | 170 | 225 | INJ | 290 |  | 210 | 280 | 310 | 260 | 315 | 230 | 295 | 320 |  
 | TD | 21 |  | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | INJ | 2 |  | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  
 | INT | 15 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | INJ | 0 |  | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Michael Vick | 490 | + | 10 | 0 | 20 | 40 | 55 | 245 | 0 |  | 15 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 20 | 15 | 0 | 40 |  
 | TD | 5 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 | INT | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Ru Yards | 245 |  | 5 | 30 | 15 | 0 | 20 | 40 | 10 |  | 20 | 10 | 10 | 40 | 25 | 5 | 0 | 15 |  
 | Ru TD | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | LeSean McCoy | 815 | - | 50 | 65 | 40 | 70 | 50 | 70 | 40 |  | 65 | 35 | 55 | 70 | 65 | 40 | 70 | 30 |  
 | Ru TD | 5 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Re Yards | 420 |  | 30 | 20 | 25 | 15 | 25 | 50 | 35 |  | 20 | 35 | 30 | 25 | 20 | 15 | 45 | 30 |  
 | Re TD | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 53 |  | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 4 |  | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Mike Bell | 380 |  | 30 | 45 | 25 | 20 | 35 | 15 | 30 |  | 25 | 40 | 10 | 25 | 25 | 10 | 30 | 15 |  
 | Ru TD | 5 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 | Re Yards | 25 |  | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Re TD | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 4 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | DeSean Jackson | 1085 | ! | 50 | 110 | 80 | 45 | 75 | 85 | 30 |  | 20 | 60 | 120 | 75 | 90 | 40 | 80 | 125 |  
 | Re TD | 7 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |  
 | Rec | 73 |  | 4 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 2 |  | 1 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 8 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Jeremy Maclin | 1005 |  | 70 | 110 | 70 | 60 | 70 | 35 | 85 |  | 50 | 45 | 85 | 30 | 65 | 60 | 70 | 100 |  
 | Re TD | 5 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 | Rec | 60 |  | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 6 |  | 3 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 6 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Jason Avant | 560 |  | 40 | 50 | 35 | 50 | 40 | 25 | 40 |  | 60 | 40 | 25 | 30 | 35 | 45 | 20 | 25 |  
 | Re TD | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 45 |  | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3 |  | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 |  
 | Hank Baskett/ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Riley Cooper | 170 |  | 25 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 |  | 20 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 15 |  
 | Re TD | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 9 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Brent Celek | 1050 | + | 55 | 75 | 85 | 40 | 45 | 50 | 100 |  | 55 | 65 | 80 | 100 | 85 | 70 | 80 | 65 |  
 | Re TD | 8 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 88 |  | 4 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 8 |  | 5 | 6 | 7 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 5 |  |  Run: Unlike just about any other 
                team in the NFL, the Eagles are annually one team that appears 
                to be content with not having a RB run for 1,000 yards. In fact, 
                only twice since 2003 has a Philadelphia RB (Brian Westbrook) 
                accomplished the feat. So, as the Eagles move forward without 
                Westbrook for the first time in nine seasons, it seems unlikely 
                the team will send another RB to the 1,000-yard club in 2010 – 
                especially since Vick figures to steal a few opportunities each 
                week. Because so much of the fantasy value Eagles RBs can possess 
                is tied into the passing game, I will divert from my usual path 
                of analyzing the entire schedule and simply direct your attention 
                to the matchups I believe McCoy and Bell can take advantage of 
                this season. Detroit and Jacksonville (Weeks 2-3) should each be improved 
                vs. the run this season, but lack the overall talent and depth 
                from front to back to be a good bet to hold up against a team 
                that is willing to commit to running the ball. (In the Eagles’ 
                case, this often only occurs when they are trying to close out 
                the game in the final minutes.) Week 6 offers another opportunity 
                for Philadelphia to run the ball at home vs. a suspect Falcons’ 
                run-stopping defense. At this point, only one Atlanta front-seven 
                defender – MLB Curtis Lofton – can be considered an 
                above-average talent as a defender in the run game. Beyond those 
                three contests, the Eagles’ run game figures to be a hit-or-miss 
                proposition against what projects to be one of the league’s 
                toughest run schedules.
 Pass: While many expect Jackson 
                and Celek to alternate as Kolb’s favorite target each week, 
                I find it hard to believe that the TE (and Kolb's best friend 
                on the team) won't hold a significant lead in the reception department 
                at season's end. Kolb's first start as the team's unquestioned 
                QB1 couldn't be much tougher than it is in Week 1 when the Eagles 
                host the Packers and DC Dom Capers' zone blitz schemes. The next 
                two weeks should offer less of a challenge as neither Detroit 
                nor Jacksonville has the safety play or pass rush to contain Jackson 
                all game long. (Although the Lions’ Louis Delmas is a future 
                star, the Lions lack the pass rush.) The difficulty of the schedule 
                ratchets back up as the Redskins and Niners (Weeks 4-5) bring 
                their 3-4 defenses (and what could be above-average pass defenses), 
                meaning Kolb may struggle in three of his first five games out 
                of the gate. Atlanta and Tennessee (Weeks 6-7) are interesting 
                back-to-back contests for the Eagles in that both defenses feature 
                upper-echelon CBs (Dunta Robinson and Cortland Finnegan), but 
                lack many of the other necessary parts to do much more than shut 
                down just one aspect of the Eagles' offense, meaning Maclin and 
                Celek should be in line for solid games. The second-half slate is not pleasant coming out of the bye for 
                Philly as it plays four consecutive games against some of the 
                best individual pass rushers and/or pass defenses the league can 
                offer. In addition to Dwight Freeney and Robert Mathis (and the 
                stingy Colts' pass defense) in Week 9, the Eagles must face the 
                3-4 OLB duo of Andre Carter and Brian Orakpo (Week 10), the Giants' 
                plethora of athletic DEs (Week 11) and a Julius Peppers-led Bears' 
                defense (that loves to blitz) in Week 12 that will be one of the 
                league's best overall defenses if it can just stay healthy. After 
                that long run of difficult opponents, Philadelphia must hold up 
                against two more teams from Texas that figure to be heavy-blitzing 
                defenses as well. Whereas the Eagles may be able to take advantage 
                of a young Texans' secondary (Week 13), it's doubtful Philly will 
                enjoy much success against the talented Cowboys' pass defense 
                one week later. Along with Dallas game, the fantasy playoff schedule 
                wraps up with another poor matchup against the Giants on the road 
                in Week 15 and a Vikings' defense that will make the Eagles even 
                more of a one-dimensional offense than they already are. 
 
 
                 
                 | 
                       
                        | Washington Redskins |  
 |  | Totals |  | DAL | HOU | STL | PHI | GB | IND | CHI | DET | bye | PHI | TEN | MIN | NYG | TB | DAL | JAX |  
 | (Run) |  |  | 8.8 | 7.8 | 6.2 | 8 | 9.4 | 7.6 | 8.3 | 6.4 |  | 8 | 7.8 | 9.4 | 8.3 | 6.2 | 8.8 | 6.7 |  
 | (Pass) |  |  | 7.8 | 7.5 | 6.4 | 8.2 | 8.3 | 8.8 | 8.3 | 5.8 |  | 8.2 | 7.5 | 8.2 | 8.9 | 6.4 | 7.8 | 7.6 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Donovan McNabb | 3330 |  | 275 | 230 | 255 | 250 | 170 | 215 | 225 | 350 |  | 240 | INJ | INJ | 215 | 330 | 240 | 335 |  
 | TD | 18 |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |  | 1 | INJ | INJ | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 |  
 | INT | 10 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | INJ | INJ | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  
 | Ru Yards | 155 |  | 15 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 15 | 25 | 5 | 0 |  | 20 | INJ | INJ | 20 | 10 | 20 | 0 |  
 | Ru TD | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Rex Grossman | 510 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 245 | 265 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | TD | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | INT | 4 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Clinton Portis | 865 |  | 55 | 70 | 45 | 55 | 55 | 60 | 35 | 45 |  | 80 | 35 | 25 | 65 | 110 | 75 | 55 |  
 | Ru TD | 5 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Re Yards | 205 |  | 10 | 20 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 30 |  | 15 | 25 | 30 | 5 | 0 | 15 | 30 |  
 | Re TD | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 29 |  | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |  | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Larry Johnson | 710 |  | 40 | 45 | 80 | 35 | 20 | 45 | 55 | 65 |  | 30 | 25 | 50 | 45 | 60 | 35 | 80 |  
 | Ru TD | 5 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 | Re Yards | 100 |  | 5 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 20 | 0 |  | 5 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 0 |  
 | Re TD | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 15 |  | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 |  | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Santana Moss | 900 |  | 100 | 55 | 80 | 35 | 40 | 35 | 75 | 65 |  | 55 | 40 | 30 | 85 | 50 | 70 | 85 |  
 | Re TD | 6 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 | Rec | 70 |  | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 5 |  | 4 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 6 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Joey Galloway | 390 |  | 30 | 15 | 35 | 15 | 30 | 0 | 45 | 20 |  | 25 | 0 | 45 | 25 | 60 | 25 | 20 |  
 | Re TD | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 24 |  | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Bobby Wade | 360 |  | 20 | 15 | 0 | 20 | 15 | 35 | 0 | 45 |  | 30 | 45 | 25 | 0 | 35 | 30 | 45 |  
 | Re TD | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 31 |  | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |  | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Devin Thomas | 520 |  | 15 | 45 | 25 | 50 | 20 | 40 | 20 | 65 |  | 0 | 30 | 45 | 25 | 60 | 30 | 50 |  
 | Re TD | 3 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 38 |  | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 |  | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Chris Cooley | 970 |  | 70 | 55 | 75 | 85 | 40 | 65 | 65 | 90 |  | 65 | 65 | 45 | 55 | 85 | 45 | 65 |  
 | Re TD | 7 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  
 | Rec | 85 |  | 5 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 6 |  | 5 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 6 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Fred Davis | 395 | + | 25 | 15 | 25 | 30 | 15 | 35 | 0 | 35 |  | 45 | 25 | 40 | 20 | 25 | 20 | 40 |  
 | Re TD | 4 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 | Rec | 36 |  | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 |  | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 |  |  Run: Let’s cut right to the 
                chase; the next time someone figures out what goes on in the mind 
                of HC Mike Shanahan in regards to his RB usage may be the first 
                time it has happened since the days of Terrell Davis and a young 
                Portis. Since Portis and Johnson are both now on the wrong end 
                of the RB clock, the RB situation may be more confusing than ever. 
                And while the Redskins have – for all intents and purposes 
                – solved their long-term offensive tackle problems this 
                offseason, the interior of the line remains an issue, meaning 
                the days of 5.0+ YPC from a Shanahan RB may be a year or two away. 
                The schedule does no favors in that regard either as only St. 
                Louis (Week 3) can be considered a good matchup in the Redskins’ 
                eight pre-bye games. Dallas is a poor matchup to kick off the 
                season and Houston (Week 2) has enough talent – even minus 
                OLB Brian Cushing – to contain the lack of game-breaking 
                ability the Washington RBs possess. The next three weeks see the 
                Redskins take on a pair of electric offensive teams that may not 
                allow Washington to get its running game started; even if the 
                Week 5 game is low-scoring, it may not matter with the Packers 
                being an elite run-stopping team. The pre-bye slate closes with 
                two road games, the first of which is against a Bears’ team 
                that could easily live up to my expectation as a top-10 run-stopping 
                unit. However, Week 8 in Detroit should be more palatable for 
                the Washington run game, although it may only be useful for fantasy 
                owners if Shanahan has chosen a lead RB at that point. Whatever confidence may be gained against the Lions may get lost 
                in the grueling four-week stretch after the bye. While I have 
                the Eagles and Titans (Weeks 10-11) rated as average rush defenses, 
                both have high ceilings in that regard. The Vikings and Giants 
                (Weeks 12-13), on the other hand, should be elite and near-elite 
                vs. the run, respectively. The fantasy playoff matchups in Weeks 
                14 and 16 are winnable matchups for the Redskins. Even though 
                the Bucs and Jags each should sport a young and improving defense, 
                it is a stretch to believe either team will skyrocket up the rush 
                defense rankings this season with an overall lack of proven playmakers. 
                Those two matchups sandwich another red matchup in Dallas (Week 
                15). Therefore, with a schedule that shows 40% of the teams the 
                Redskins will face this season will be difficult to run against 
                and a coach that is known for his quick trigger-finger when it 
                comes to RBs, it seems like a bad bet that either Portis or Johnson 
                will have anything more than RB3/flex potential in most leagues.
 Pass: What is clear is that Shanahan 
                will be able to do more for Donovan McNabb than ex-HC Jim Zorn 
                was ever able to do for Jason Campbell. In Shanahan’s system, 
                McNabb will be able to advantage of his underutilized mobility 
                with frequent throws on the move as the coach likes to roll his 
                signal-callers out in order to better sell the run as well as 
                buy time for his QB when he does is using play-action. What is 
                not so clear is whether McNabb is able to overcome his supporting 
                cast, which features a 31-year-old speed WR (Moss) – who 
                typically fades in the second half of the season – and little 
                else at receiver. McNabb will have a pair of solid TEs to throw 
                to, so he may not be in such bad shape, even if the Redskins will 
                struggle to create big plays in the passing game. Thankfully, 
                Washington invested in its offensive line in the offseason, so 
                it can withstand a rough first-half slate that starts on a Sunday 
                night at home vs. the Cowboys. Unlike the first game, Houston 
                and St. Louis (Weeks 2-3) should allow Shanahan to execute his 
                offensive vision for the Redskins against a young defense (the 
                Texans) minus Rookie of the Year OLB Brian Cushing and a defense 
                still at least a year away from being a respectable overall defense 
                (the Rams). After that, McNabb faces his old team (which should 
                qualify as the first of four straight red matchups for the passing 
                game if not for the fact that he should know every aspect of his 
                former team’s defense) in Week 4 before the Packers, Colts 
                and Bears complete a run of defenses that will determine the direction 
                of the Redskins’ season. Washington should catch a break and perhaps some offensive momentum 
                in the passing game right before the bye against a Lions’ 
                secondary that may be forced to start some combination of Chris 
                Houston, ex-Rams castoff Jonathan Wade, an aging Dre’ Bly 
                or rookie Amari Spievey. The much-anticipated rematch with the 
                Eagles takes place following the Week 9 bye in what could easily 
                be the first of three contests in which McNabb and Cooley hook 
                up with great frequency. Over the final quarter of the fantasy 
                season, fantasy owners may be surprised the Redskins may offer 
                some degree of help for fantasy owners looking for late-season 
                assistance. Granted, the Giants and Cowboys (Weeks 13 and 15) 
                are poor matchups for all parties, but McNabb should enjoy hosting 
                the Bucs in Week 14 and playing in Florida against the Jags in 
                Week 16 – two teams that have enough talent in the secondary 
                to contain the Redskins’ WRs, but lack the talent at LB 
                and S needed to cover Washington’s TEs.
  NFC NORTH 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Chicago Bears |  
 |  | Totals |  | DET | DAL | GB | NYG | CAR | SEA | WAS | bye | BUF | MIN | MIA | PHI | DET | NE | MIN | NYJ |  
 | (Run) |  |  | 6.4 | 8.8 | 9.4 | 8.3 | 5.8 | 7.5 | 8.2 |  | 6.1 | 9.4 | 7.2 | 8 | 6.4 | 7.4 | 9.4 | 9.1 |  
 | (Pass) |  |  | 5.8 | 7.8 | 8.3 | 8.9 | 7.1 | 8 | 7.4 |  | 6.7 | 8.2 | 8 | 8.2 | 5.8 | 7.5 | 8.2 | 9.7 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Jay Cutler | 4145 |  | 300 | 300 | 220 | 305 | 205 | 315 | 285 |  | 250 | 375 | 230 | 300 | 305 | 240 | 355 | 160 |  
 | TD | 28 |  | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 |  | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |  
 | INT | 20 |  | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |  | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 |  
 | Ru Yards | 160 |  | 5 | 10 | 5 | 20 | 10 | 0 | 15 |  | 5 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 15 |  
 | Ru TD | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Matt Forte | 860 |  | 60 | 35 | 65 | 50 | 100 | 40 | 65 |  | 75 | 35 | 50 | 60 | 55 | 80 | 55 | 35 |  
 | Ru TD | 5 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Re Yards | 365 |  | 30 | 20 | 10 | 25 | 15 | 10 | 25 |  | 40 | 55 | 20 | 15 | 35 | 25 | 30 | 10 |  
 | Re TD | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 46 |  | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 |  | 4 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Chester Taylor | 580 |  | 35 | 50 | 35 | 35 | 70 | 45 | 30 |  | 30 | 35 | 30 | 45 | 60 | 35 | 30 | 15 |  
 | Ru TD | 4 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 | Re Yards | 225 |  | 15 | 25 | 5 | 15 | 10 | 30 | 10 |  | 10 | 20 | 10 | 25 | 15 | 10 | 15 | 10 |  
 | Re TD | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 29 |  | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |  | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Devin Hester | 840 | + | 55 | 70 | 45 | 90 | 40 | 60 | 70 |  | 40 | 100 | 50 | 25 | 80 | 40 | 75 | 0 |  
 | Re TD | 5 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 55 |  | 3 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 4 |  | 2 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Johnny Knox | 890 | ^ | 80 | 70 | 65 | 55 | 50 | 100 | 45 |  | 30 | 65 | 25 | 35 | 90 | 35 | 120 | 25 |  
 | Re TD | 6 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 54 |  | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 2 |  | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Devin Aromashodu | 900 | + | 75 | 55 | 40 | 70 | 35 | 85 | 65 |  | 45 | 85 | 40 | 110 | 40 | 60 | 50 | 45 |  
 | Re TD | 7 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 65 |  | 6 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 5 |  | 4 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Earl Bennett | 455 |  | 20 | 35 | 25 | 15 | 40 | 10 | 25 |  | 35 | 40 | 50 | 30 | 25 | 45 | 35 | 25 |  
 | Re TD | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 38 |  | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 |  | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 |  
 | B Manumaleuna/ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Desmond Clark | 80 |  | 0 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 10 |  | 5 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Re TD | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 11 |  | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Greg Olsen | 390 | ! | 25 | 10 | 30 | 25 | 10 | 20 | 35 |  | 45 | 10 | 25 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 30 | 45 |  
 | Re TD | 4 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 | Rec | 33 |  | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 |  | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 |  |  Note: It is important to remember that Chicago will represent 
              the first cold-weather stop new OC Mike Martz will make since becoming 
              a NFL coordinator. Detroit and St. Louis both play indoors while 
              San Francisco cannot really be considered a cold-weather city even 
              though Candlestick Park can get chilly late in the season. I mention 
              this only to suggest that Martz may be forced to call more run plays 
              than he usually does during the fantasy playoffs.
 Run: 
                If ever there was a time and a team to heed my advice when it 
                comes to schedule analysis, the 2010 Bears would be it. While 
                the run game already figured to be an afterthought once Chicago 
                hired OC Mike Martz this offseason, the schedule maker did fantasy 
                owners one better – but we’ll get to that in a bit. 
                Because fantasy owners know what Martz means to a running game, 
                it makes it very difficult to award any green matchups to Forte 
                or Taylor simply because it’s not certain the new OC will 
                take advantage of such a matchup. Nevertheless, the season kicks 
                off with a solid run game matchup vs. Detroit before getting difficult 
                in a hurry in Weeks 2-4 against Dallas, Green Bay and the New 
                York Giants – three teams that should have more than enough 
                ammunition to keep the Bears’ running game in check. The 
                schedule quickly reverses course against the team I project to 
                have the worst run defense (Carolina) and a home game against 
                a team (Seattle) which almost always seems to experience a significant 
                drop-off in its play away from Qwest Field. Washington (Week 7) 
                projects to be the fourth pre-bye team that has a defense capable 
                of stuffing Forte and Taylor. Another potential great run matchup awaits Forte and Taylor in 
                Week 9 at Buffalo, but it is hard to find a defense for Forte 
                and Taylor to thrive against until Week 13 potentially, and even 
                that is a tough sell because I expect the Lions’ run defense 
                to get significantly better as the season progresses. And, then, 
                that’s when it gets downright dreadful for the Bears. While 
                the pass game will certainly be affected by the quality of opponents 
                during the fantasy playoffs, it is the run game that will take 
                the biggest hit. Facing a Bill Belichick defense in Week 14 is 
                never a pleasant thought, but seeing two of the top-five run defenses 
                in the final two weeks of the fantasy season is enough to severely 
                downgrade Forte and Taylor as it is highly unlikely either will 
                help fantasy owners take home their league title in Weeks 15-16.
 Pass: If the 2010 Bears hope to 
                emulate “The Greatest Show on Turf” Rams that Martz 
                oversaw in St. Louis, we have to know where everyone stands. Knox 
                is locked into the Torry Holt’s old split end role of the 
                offense while Hester is being groomed for Isaac Bruce’s 
                flanker spot. Aromashodu is being prepped for all three positions 
                (including the slot), but the team would like to see Hester return 
                kicks and punts. Not only that, Martz envisions Hester in more 
                of an Az Hakim role (who drew a lot of special teams work as you 
                may recall). So, sometime before the end of the season, Knox should 
                be Holt, Aromashodu should be Bruce (if he can stay healthy) and 
                Hester should be Hakim. Just for good measure, Bennett should 
                play the role of Ricky Proehl…got all that? The season begins with what could be an aerial circus for both 
                teams at home vs. Detroit. It quickly turns sour in Weeks 2-4, 
                though, as the Cowboys, Packers and Giants will have a chance 
                to harass Cutler all day behind a shaky pass-blocking line. Carolina 
                (Week 5) is talented enough in the secondary to cause the Bears 
                WRs some problems, but the Panthers will struggle all season long 
                to generate pressure on the QB, so the deep drops required in 
                a Martz offense may not open Cutler to all that much punishment. 
                Seattle and Washington (Weeks 6-7) are consecutive home games 
                for the Bears, the former which should play out much like the 
                Carolina game. The latter contest, on the other hand, may remind 
                Chicago of its rough three-game stretch in Weeks 2-4. The second 
                half of the slate starts well for the Bears as neither the Bills 
                (Week 9) nor the Vikings (Week 10) may have enough depth in the 
                secondary to contend with the likes of Hester, Knox and Aromashodu. 
                However, Miami and Philadelphia (Weeks 11-12) should be more than 
                capable of generating pressure on the QB and holding up long enough 
                in coverage to make it a long and taxing day for Cutler. Detroit 
                (Week 13) may allow Chicago to find its bearings once again, but 
                good luck against the Belichick-coached Patriots, a road game 
                against the Vikings and the Jets (Weeks 14-16). 
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Detroit Lions |  
 |  | Totals |  | CHI | PHI | MIN | GB | STL | NYG | bye | WAS | NYJ | BUF | DAL | NE | CHI | GB | TB | MIA |  
 | (Run) |  |  | 8.3 | 8 | 9.4 | 9.4 | 6.2 | 8.3 |  | 8.2 | 9.1 | 6.1 | 8.8 | 7.4 | 8.3 | 9.4 | 6.2 | 7.2 |  
 | (Pass) |  |  | 8.3 | 8.2 | 8.2 | 8.3 | 6.4 | 8.9 |  | 7.4 | 9.7 | 6.7 | 7.8 | 7.5 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 6.4 | 8 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Matthew Stafford | 3760 | ^ | 280 | 270 | 235 | 215 | 310 | 260 |  | 255 | 190 | 255 | 205 | 190 | 295 | 240 | 310 | 250 |  
 | TD | 24 |  | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 |  | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 |  
 | INT | 18 |  | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 |  | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Jahvid Best | 1035 | + | 60 | 85 | 40 | 55 | 120 | 70 |  | 60 | 35 | 135 | 65 | INJ | 85 | 55 | 110 | 60 |  
 | Ru TD | 5 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | INJ | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 | Re Yards | 340 |  | 40 | 20 | 10 | 35 | 15 | 30 |  | 10 | 15 | 35 | 15 | INJ | 25 | 15 | 55 | 20 |  
 | Re TD | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 40 |  | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 |  | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | INJ | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Kevin Smith | 345 |  | 15 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 15 | 25 |  | 20 | 10 | 10 | 35 | 70 | 25 | 35 | 20 | 25 |  
 | Ru TD | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Re Yards | 105 |  | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 5 |  | 10 | 0 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 0 |  
 | Re TD | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 15 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Calvin Johnson | 1225 |  | 115 | 80 | 80 | 55 | 150 | 80 |  | 90 | 30 | 90 | 70 | INJ | 100 | 120 | 100 | 65 |  
 | Re TD | 11 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | INJ | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 80 |  | 7 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 8 | 5 |  | 6 | 2 | 8 | 6 | INJ | 5 | 8 | 5 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Nate Burleson | 860 |  | 50 | 65 | 70 | 40 | 55 | 35 |  | 60 | 50 | 35 | 80 | 75 | 40 | 60 | 65 | 80 |  
 | Re TD | 5 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 | Rec | 63 |  | 3 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 3 |  | 5 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Bryant Johnson | 300 |  | 20 | 30 | 0 | 30 | 25 | 35 |  | 0 | 20 | 25 | 0 | 35 | 35 | 0 | 30 | 15 |  
 | Re TD | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 17 |  | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 |  | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Brandon Pettigrew | 360 |  | 15 | 20 | 35 | 15 | 25 | 45 |  | 30 | 35 | 20 | 0 | 25 | 30 | 15 | 10 | 40 |  
 | Re TD | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 36 |  | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |  | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Tony Scheffler | 570 | ^ | 35 | 50 | 40 | 35 | 30 | 30 |  | 55 | 40 | 40 | 25 | 35 | 60 | 20 | 45 | 30 |  
 | Re TD | 5 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 47 |  | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 |  | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 |  |  Run: In my estimation, a true fantasy 
                RB2 is a player who has the ability to almost single-handedly 
                carry his fantasy owners to victory some weeks, but is too inconsistent 
                to be considered a RB1. Combining his recent injury history college 
                with the (small) threat of Smith stealing important carries from 
                him at some point; it becomes pretty clear that Best will be a 
                “true” RB2 in fantasy this season, especially after 
                analyzing the schedule. The rookie draws no breaks over the first 
                quarter of the season as the Bears, Eagles, Vikings and Packers 
                all should have (or already possess) above-average to elite run 
                defenses. Best should scorch a slower Rams defense in Week 5, 
                but the Giants could easily be the fifth of six teams before the 
                bye that could bottle up the speedster. Little changes after the Week 7 bye as three of the next four 
                opponents each have a 3-4 defense that could easily overwhelm 
                the Lions’ average run-blocking line (Redskins, Jets and 
                Cowboys). However, the first two of those games are at home and 
                should serve as good preparation for the one team in that stretch 
                that doesn’t figure to be all that great at stopping the 
                run (Buffalo), another 3-4 defense. New England (Week 12) and 
                Chicago (Week 13) could also give Best fits before the Lions must 
                play host to the difficult Packers’ defense once again in 
                Week 14. Almost as a reward for playing such a difficult stretch 
                of defenses, the schedule allows Detroit to finish up its fantasy 
                schedule in the state of Florida in games vs. Tampa Bay (Week 
                15) and Miami (Week 16). Although Miami’s defense should 
                be up to the task of bottling up Best, the rookie’s speed 
                could easily overwhelm the Bucs.
 Pass: It is my opinion that Johnson 
                could easily become this generation’s Randy Moss (and then 
                some), but in order for that to happen, “Megatron” 
                needs to stay healthy. As the team’s offensive centerpiece 
                and with an improved supporting cast, he’ll certainly have 
                the opportunity. Only one game (against Revis) should lead to 
                definite struggles for his fantasy numbers, although there are 
                a number of solid CBs the Lions must face this season. The early 
                going is not easy, however, for the Lions’ offensive line, 
                which must face Julius Peppers, Trent Cole and Jared Allen in 
                the first three games of the season. If they can stand up to that 
                trio of pass rushers, it bodes well for the Lions when they take 
                on Green Bay’s high-pressure, turnover-forcing defense in 
                Week 4. The schedule provides Detroit a chance to lick its wounds 
                in Week 5 against a weak Rams pass rush and secondary, but sends 
                the team right back into the fire against what figures to be another 
                top pass-rush unit in the Giants in the week before the bye. The Lions open up the second-half schedule facing four consecutive 
                3-4 defenses (Weeks 8-11, three of which will test the improvement 
                the offensive line made over the first half of the season. New 
                England and Chicago (Weeks 12-13) each have the defensive minds 
                in place to slow down Detroit’s passing game, but it is 
                doubtful that either opponent has an answer for Johnson now that 
                the Lions have players like Burleson and Scheffler who can make 
                defenses pay for double- and triple-teaming Johnson. Green Bay 
                (Week 14) ends Detroit’s run of three straight home games 
                but also may not have the pieces necessary to control all of the 
                Lions’ weapons, while the Bucs (Weeks 15) probably don’t 
                possess the pass-rush capabilities needed to harass Stafford. 
                The fantasy season ends with a road test against what should be 
                a difficult road matchup vs. DC Mike Nolan’s Dolphins defense. 
                Miami possesses the CBs necessary to stay with Johnson and Burleson, 
                but may not be able to solve Scheffler. So, if it isn’t 
                apparent by now, two things must happen for Detroit to become 
                the land of fantasy opportunity: 1) Stafford must take the leap 
                the Lions believe he can and be able to make quicker decisions 
                and 2) the line must be much improved, which will be helped by 
                Best and a more experienced Stafford.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Green Bay Packers |  
 |  | Totals |  | PHI | BUF | CHI | DET | WAS | MIA | MIN | NYJ | DAL | bye | MIN | ATL | SF | DET | NE | NYG |  
 | (Run) |  |  | 8 | 6.1 | 8.3 | 6.4 | 8.2 | 7.2 | 9.4 | 9.1 | 8.8 |  | 9.4 | 6.6 | 8.9 | 6.4 | 7.4 | 8.3 |  
 | (Pass) |  |  | 8.2 | 6.7 | 8.3 | 5.8 | 7.4 | 8 | 8.2 | 9.7 | 7.8 |  | 8.2 | 7.7 | 7.9 | 5.8 | 7.5 | 8.9 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Aaron Rodgers | 4340 |  | 315 | 240 | 225 | 330 | 325 | 270 | 345 | 210 | 270 |  | 335 | 325 | 235 | 305 | 270 | 340 |  
 | TD | 29 |  | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 |  | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 |  
 | INT | 10 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  
 | Ru Yards | 305 |  | 20 | 5 | 30 | 10 | 25 | 15 | 25 | 20 | 25 |  | 40 | 10 | 30 | 10 | 25 | 15 |  
 | Ru TD | 4 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Ryan Grant | 1115 |  | 55 | 115 | 65 | 75 | 60 | 80 | 55 | 40 | 65 |  | 75 | 120 | 80 | 75 | 65 | 90 |  
 | Ru TD | 10 |  | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  
 | Re Yards | 210 |  | 10 | 0 | 20 | 5 | 25 | 15 | 40 | 20 | 0 |  | 15 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 25 | 15 |  
 | Re TD | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 22 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Brandon Jackson | 120 |  | 15 | 0 | 5 | 20 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 |  | 0 | 5 | 20 | 30 | 5 | 0 |  
 | Ru TD | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Re Yards | 160 |  | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 15 | 10 | 5 |  | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 5 | 0 |  
 | Re TD | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 22 |  | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 |  | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | James Starks | 260 | ^ | 15 | 15 | 10 | 20 | 25 | 10 | 20 | 35 | 25 |  | 10 | 15 | INJ | INJ | 45 | 15 |  
 | Ru TD | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 1 | 0 |  
 | Re Yards | 185 |  | 10 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 15 | 25 |  | 25 | 35 | INJ | INJ | 15 | 25 |  
 | Re TD | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 17 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |  | 2 | 2 | INJ | INJ | 1 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Greg Jennings | 1065 |  | 80 | 100 | 40 | 120 | 70 | 55 | 60 | 20 | 80 |  | 75 | 90 | 40 | 70 | 110 | 55 |  
 | Re TD | 8 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 72 |  | 6 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 5 |  | 5 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Donald Driver | 760 | ! | 40 | 50 | 35 | 70 | 55 | 65 | 40 | 40 | 55 |  | 100 | 70 | 35 | 25 | 35 | 45 |  
 | Re TD | 4 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 | Rec | 58 |  | 3 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 4 |  | 6 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | James Jones | 405 |  | 25 | 0 | 30 | 50 | 35 | 40 | 55 | 0 | 45 |  | 15 | 0 | 20 | 50 | 0 | 40 |  
 | Re TD | 4 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 22 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Jordy Nelson | 480 | + | 50 | 20 | 10 | 15 | 45 | 0 | 35 | 55 | 25 |  | 35 | 30 | 15 | 60 | 40 | 45 |  
 | Re TD | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 40 |  | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 2 |  | 3 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Jermichael Finley | 1075 | ^ | 80 | 60 | 75 | 60 | 80 | 55 | 100 | 50 | 35 |  | 65 | 90 | 100 | 70 | 40 | 115 |  
 | Re TD | 11 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |  
 | Rec | 81 |  | 6 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 4 |  | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 8 |  |  Run: Anyone who has been a Grant 
                owner over the past three seasons already knows that he has been 
                a second-half (of the season) runner. Judging by the schedule, 
                he may not get much of a chance to do it again. Grant may be a 
                bit hit-or-miss during the first quarter of the fantasy slate, 
                though, as Green Bay will alternate potentially poor matchups 
                in Weeks 1 and 3 with green matchups in Weeks 2 and 4. Given the 
                fact that Grant should never see a loaded box with all the weapons 
                the team has in the passing game, he could easily run through 
                the Eagles and Bears’ defenses as well if he doesn’t 
                need eight games to “warm up” in 2010. Washington 
                and Miami (Weeks 5-6) both possess 3-4 defenses which should serve 
                as a good indication as to how the Packers will fare against the 
                most brutal part of their run schedule (Weeks 7, 8, 9 and 11). 
                In facing the Vikings (twice), Jets and Cowboys, Green Bay will 
                play four consecutive contests against defenses I have projected 
                as top-five run-stopping units. Even with Rodgers as the centerpiece 
                of this offense, expect Grant to struggle mightily during this 
                time and defer to the passing game. Week 12 may offer the Packers’ ground attack a one-week 
                reprieve – although a road game in Atlanta may be a shootout 
                in which the run game suffers yet again – before Green Bay 
                is forced the face the sixth-best run defense (according to my 
                defensive efficiency ratings) in the Niners, although that contest 
                is at Lambeau Field. In Week 14, the Packers draw a Lions defense 
                that should be much improved over last season vs. the run, but 
                one that Grant should have some success against. The weather – 
                as it usually does – figures to play a pivotal role in the 
                game-planning of the Packers’ offense in Weeks 15 and 16 
                when they first travel to New England before returning home and 
                hosting the Giants. Even though the Pats and Giants should both 
                field respectable run defenses, expect Grant to see enough carries 
                in both games to be productive in fantasy. Without sounding like 
                a broken record, defenses will have to give Green Bay the running 
                game in many cases because the passing attack is so good. Combine 
                that with Grant’s history as a November and December standout 
                and fantasy owners should have themselves a solid RB2.
 Pass: Rodgers is the epitome of 
                a fantasy QB: he is accurate, mobile, durable and plays in an 
                offense perfectly suited for him. His passing numbers since becoming 
                the starter speak for themselves and, while he’s not the 
                best athlete, he knows when to run and does a good job at being 
                productive in that area of his game. But what makes him so good 
                is that his combination of supporting cast and running ability 
                make him a good bet for jaw-dropping fantasy numbers each week, 
                almost regardless of the opponent. Thus, only the projected best 
                defense in the NFL this season (the Jets, Week 8) makes the cut 
                as a red matchup for Rodgers this season. And to be honest, there 
                isn’t a defense in the league that can legitimately cover 
                the wealth of gifted receivers the Packers have (Jennings, Driver, 
                Jones, Nelson and now Finley) all game long. As a result, Rodgers 
                is just about as much as a lock for fantasy production this season 
                as an owner can hope for from any QB this year. As the receivers go, Weeks 6-9 represent the only truly difficult 
                part of the season. Miami’s two athletic CBs (Vontae Davis, 
                Sean Smith) are more than capable of locking down Driver and Jennings, 
                but don’t figure to have an answer for Finley. The Jets 
                (Week 8) do have the overall personnel and scheme and represent 
                the one bump in the road for the Packers, but the other difficult 
                matchup – the Cowboys in Week 9 – must play Green 
                Bay at Lambeau Field. The only other challenge is one that no 
                one can reasonably predict – how treacherous will the weather 
                be in Weeks 15 (when the Packers visit the Pats) and 16 (when 
                they host the Giants)? As we have learned, wind is a major consideration 
                in these cold-weather contests. But talk of the elements aside, 
                I believe I may be underselling Rodgers’ numbers above because 
                he is line for a huge season. On the other hand, I feel pretty 
                confident in Finley’s ability to hit the numbers I forecasted 
                for him.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Minnesota Vikings |  
 |  | Totals |  | NO | MIA | DET | bye | NYJ | DAL | GB | NE | ARI | CHI | GB | WAS | BUF | NYG | CHI | PHI |  
 | (Run) |  |  | 7.4 | 7.2 | 6.4 |  | 9.1 | 8.8 | 9.4 | 7.4 | 8.5 | 8.3 | 9.4 | 8.2 | 6.1 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 8 |  
 | (Pass) |  |  | 7.8 | 8 | 5.8 |  | 9.7 | 7.8 | 8.3 | 7.5 | 7.4 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 7.4 | 6.7 | 8.9 | 8.3 | 8.2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Brett Favre | 3755 | ! | 285 | 250 | 275 |  | 160 | 180 | 270 | 230 | 305 | 300 | 235 | 265 | 200 | 285 | 240 | 275 |  
 | TD | 26 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 |  
 | INT | 13 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Adrian Peterson | 1400 |  | 110 | 80 | 110 |  | 65 | 85 | 65 | 100 | 50 | 110 | 90 | 80 | 150 | 70 | 130 | 105 |  
 | Ru TD | 17 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  
 | Re Yards | 435 |  | 30 | 40 | 25 |  | 25 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 50 | 25 | 15 | 65 | 20 | 35 | 25 | 35 |  
 | Re TD | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 46 |  | 4 | 3 | 2 |  | 5 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Toby Gerhart | 325 |  | 20 | 15 | 35 |  | 10 | 15 | 20 | 35 | 20 | 15 | 20 | 15 | 30 | 25 | 15 | 35 |  
 | Ru TD | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Re Yards | 45 |  | 5 | 0 | 5 |  | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 0 |  
 | Re TD | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 8 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Percy Harvin | 130 |  | 15 | 0 | 10 |  | 5 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 25 | 0 | 10 | INJ | 20 | 15 | 0 | 10 |  
 | Re TD | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 | Re Yards | 955 |  | 55 | 80 | 60 |  | 45 | 30 | 75 | 65 | 90 | 105 | 55 | INJ | 45 | 80 | 70 | 100 |  
 | Re TD | 7 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |  
 | Rec | 66 |  | 4 | 6 | 5 |  | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 4 | INJ | 3 | 5 | 6 | 6 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Sidney Rice | 1015 | - | 45 | 55 | 65 |  | 15 | 80 | 50 | 100 | 45 | 75 | 65 | 110 | 80 | 70 | 100 | 60 |  
 | Ru TD | 6 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 | Re Yards | 66 |  | 2 | 3 | 4 |  | 1 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Bernard Berrian | 725 |  | 75 | 30 | 85 |  | 25 | 30 | 80 | 35 | 55 | 75 | 35 | 70 | 40 | 30 | 25 | 35 |  
 | Re TD | 5 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 | Rec | 47 |  | 5 | 2 | 6 |  | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | Visanthe Shiancoe | 580 |  | 75 | 45 | 35 |  | 50 | 25 | 50 | 10 | 55 | 20 | 65 | 15 | 10 | 70 | 10 | 45 |  
 | Re TD | 8 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  
 | Rec | 53 |  | 5 | 5 | 3 |  | 6 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 5 |  |  Run: If Peterson is going to take 
                the world by storm again this season, he’s going to have 
                to do it against the second-most difficult run schedule of the 
                teams we’ve analyzed so far (Miami has the toughest). And 
                whatever advantage Peterson gets in opportunity because the Vikes 
                allowed Chester Taylor to leave, the schedule more than makes 
                up for in unforgiving run defenses. AP should get off to a good 
                start, however, as Minnesota will be primed to give the Saints 
                a heavy dose of Peterson in the Superdome for the Thursday night 
                opener. Miami and DC Mike Nolan (Week 2) should be able to keep 
                the Minnesota ground game in check somewhat, but Detroit (Week 
                3) should be Peterson’s best chance to hit the century mark 
                – if he hasn’t done so already – before the 
                team’s early bye week.
 In Weeks 5-7, the Vikings are faced with a threesome of 3-4 defenses 
                (all of which I have projected as in the top seven of rush defenses). 
                New England (Week 8) may offer a bit of break, although a healthy 
                Pats’ defense would likely force Favre to beat them. Another 
                3-4 defense (Arizona) that I have among the top 10 rush defenses 
                awaits Minnesota in Week 9, before Chicago – a team that 
                Peterson has torn apart in his short career – hosts the 
                Vikings in Week 10. Another meeting against the Packers follows 
                before Minnesota faces its sixth 3-4 defense post-bye on the road 
                at Washington. AP owners finally catch a break as the Vikings 
                host Buffalo’s porous run defense in Week 13 before closing 
                out with a trio of defenses which could all do a fair job at containing 
                Peterson in the fantasy playoffs. The schedule is enough for me 
                to downgrade AP to the back end of the first tier of RBs, meaning 
                he probably should be drafted behind Maurice Jones-Drew, Ray Rice 
                and Chris Johnson.
 
 Pass: This passing game has complete 
                boom-or-bust potential this season. What do I mean? Does Favre 
                return? How bad is Rice’s hip? How often will Harvin’s 
                migranes bother him this season? Obviously, at this point of the 
                preseason, we’ll cover the best-case scenarios for Favre 
                and Harvin (because their situations are guesswork to say the 
                least) while maintaining skepticism regarding Rice (as just last 
                week HC Brad Childress stated he felt his WR was “a ways 
                away” from coming off active/PUP); thus, I’m predicting 
                a slow start from Rice. Unfortunately, the schedule doesn’t 
                give much of a break to the team many feel will be a Super Bowl 
                team this season. The season gets off to a rough start – 
                especially if Rice isn’t 100% - begins against a pair of 
                DCs in the Saints’ Gregg Williams and Dolphins’ Mike 
                Nolan who know a thing or two about bringing pressure. Both coordinators 
                also have the starting CBs necessary to lock up Rice and Berrian, 
                so Harvin may be a featured player in the first two weeks as well 
                as Shiancoe. Detroit (Week 3) should be a plus-matchup leading 
                into the bye, but Minnesota may be forced to lean on the run (something 
                they will probably do more this year anyway) more heavily if Rice 
                is still struggling to get back to full health. Coming out of the bye, the passing game had better be healthy 
                because three of the nastiest defenses the league can offer will 
                be waiting. The Jets (Week 5), Cowboys (Week 6) and Packers (Week 
                7) all have the personnel to make the Vikings one-dimensional 
                if Rice or Harvin are limited or Favre is still somehow hampered 
                by his ankle. Although the Pats’ defense (Week 8) isn’t 
                what it used to be, they are still another formidable defense 
                that will also test Minnesota’s mettle. In fact, it isn’t 
                until the Bills Week 13 when the Vikings’ receivers can 
                honestly look at their schedule and find an opponent they should 
                dominate. The fantasy playoff run in Weeks 14-16 provides Minnesota 
                with a small break as the first two weeks are at home in the Metrodome, 
                but gives the team another run of potentially dangerous pass defenses. 
                In fact, the final three weeks of the fantasy slate are loaded 
                with defenses who figure to bring the blitz as much – if 
                not more – than any other team in the league this season. 
                Worse yet, all three defenses have the CBs necessary to severely 
                limit Rice’s potential fantasy playoff impact. Due to his 
                hip injury, the schedule and the attention he will generate as 
                the Vikings’ WR1, Rice should probably viewed as a fantasy 
                WR2 and may even be less productive than Harvin this season while 
                Favre should be expected to regress as well, if he even plays.
 Suggestions, comments, musings about the article or fantasy football 
                in general? E-mail me. 
               |