The NFL has evolved from a league where analysts were constantly
muttering about how running games win championships to one where
the passing game has become the priority. While that didn’t
change in 2012, teams did seem to put more emphasis on running the
ball. Below is a breakdown of the run-to-pass ratio for every NFL
squad from last season, sorted by Run%.
Run / Pass
Ratios - 2012 |
Team |
Rush Att. |
Pass Att. |
Sacks Allowed |
Total Plays |
Run % |
Pass % |
Seattle |
536 |
405 |
33 |
941 |
56.96 |
43.04 |
Washington |
519 |
442 |
33 |
961 |
54.01 |
45.99 |
San Francisco |
492 |
436 |
41 |
928 |
53.02 |
46.98 |
Kansas City |
500 |
475 |
40 |
975 |
51.28 |
48.72 |
Minnesota |
486 |
483 |
32 |
969 |
50.15 |
49.85 |
New York Jets |
494 |
493 |
47 |
987 |
50.05 |
49.95 |
Chicago |
470 |
485 |
44 |
955 |
49.21 |
50.79 |
Carolina |
462 |
490 |
36 |
952 |
48.53 |
51.47 |
Houston |
508 |
554 |
28 |
1062 |
47.83 |
52.17 |
Miami |
440 |
504 |
37 |
944 |
46.61 |
53.39 |
Buffalo |
442 |
511 |
30 |
953 |
46.38 |
53.62 |
Denver |
481 |
588 |
21 |
1069 |
44.99 |
55.01 |
New England |
523 |
641 |
27 |
1164 |
44.93 |
55.07 |
Cincinnati |
430 |
540 |
46 |
970 |
44.33 |
55.67 |
Baltimore |
444 |
560 |
38 |
1004 |
44.22 |
55.78 |
San Diego |
411 |
528 |
49 |
939 |
43.77 |
56.23 |
Green Bay |
433 |
558 |
51 |
991 |
43.69 |
56.31 |
New York Giants |
409 |
539 |
20 |
948 |
43.14 |
56.86 |
St. Louis |
410 |
557 |
35 |
967 |
42.40 |
57.60 |
Tampa Bay |
416 |
566 |
26 |
982 |
42.36 |
57.64 |
Pittsburgh |
412 |
574 |
37 |
986 |
41.78 |
58.22 |
Indianapolis |
440 |
628 |
41 |
1068 |
41.20 |
58.80 |
Tennessee |
378 |
540 |
39 |
918 |
41.18 |
58.82 |
Cleveland |
396 |
566 |
36 |
962 |
41.16 |
58.84 |
Philadelphia |
413 |
618 |
48 |
1031 |
40.10 |
59.90 |
Atlanta |
378 |
615 |
28 |
993 |
38.07 |
61.93 |
Jacksonville |
358 |
586 |
50 |
944 |
37.92 |
62.08 |
Oakland |
376 |
629 |
27 |
1005 |
37.41 |
62.59 |
Arizona |
352 |
608 |
58 |
960 |
36.66 |
63.34 |
New Orleans |
370 |
671 |
26 |
1041 |
35.54 |
64.46 |
Dallas |
355 |
658 |
36 |
1013 |
35.04 |
64.96 |
Detroit |
391 |
740 |
29 |
1131 |
34.57 |
65.43 |
There were six teams that had more running plays than passing
plays in 2012, which is double the number from 2011. Will that
trend continue in 2013? Let’s take a look at what this collective
information could mean for 2013.
- Option quarterbacks will go early:
Three of the six teams (Seattle, San Francisco, Washington)
that had more running plays than passing plays last season utilized
option-style quarterbacks. Russell
Wilson, Colin
Kaepernick and Robert
Griffin III each ran for more than 400 yards with at least
four touchdowns. With rushing scores being more valuable than
passing scores, it behooves fantasy owners to snag a running
QB. Cam
Newton has proven his worth this way in the past couple
of seasons, and even Andrew
Luck ran for five touchdowns last year. But fantasy owners
should be wary of reaching for the new-school quarterbacks—we
aren’t sure how quickly defenses will adapt, and the risk of
injury is, obviously, much higher.
- The coaching carousel will have a
strong effect on teams' run-to-pass ratio: There have
been eight head coaching changes in the NFL this season, and
a whopping 13 teams have different offensive coordinators than
last year. In Arizona, new head coach Bruce Arians should help
Carson
Palmer stay relevant while renewing Larry
Fitzgerald’s fantasy status because, as his run/pass numbers
from last year with the Colts suggest, his offenses will throw
the ball. Jacksonville hired former Seattle defensive coordinator
Gus Bradley, and that means there’s little doubt the Jags will
throw the ball far less than 62 percent of the time, which is
what they did last season. Under Mike McCoy, the Chargers should
see an uptick in running plays, while in Kansas City, it’s hard
to believe Andy Reid will do anything but drastically increase
the percentage of that team’s passing plays.
- Rookie running backs will have more
of an impact than one might think: Though there are almost
always impact rookie running backs, this year’s draft was a
bit different in that not one back went in the first round.
It’s easy to think that may mean a lack of impact rookie runners,
but don’t be misled—we will continue to see first-year backs
be effective in fantasy. Denver ran the ball nearly 45 percent
of the time last season, and that was with a mediocre stable
of backs. Montee
Ball should take a large percentage of those carries this
season, and his nose for the end zone makes him highly valuable.
Le’Veon
Bell takes over for a Steelers squad that should run more
than 41 percent of the time, Eddie
Lacy will get goal-line carries in Green Bay, and don’t
overlook Joseph
Randle in Dallas, who is behind the oft-injured DeMarco
Murray and on a team that figures to put more emphasis on
their running game this year.
- Success of free agents will depend
on team as much as talent: A number of high-profile and
productive players changed squads through free agency, and the
teams they went to will impact how much fantasy owners can get
out of them this season. Steven
Jackson landed in Atlanta, and even though he remains productive
for a long-time veteran back, the Falcons are a throwing team,
having chucked it almost 62 percent of the time last year. Greg
Jennings headed to Minnesota, and he should see a downturn
in his production on a team that runs the ball so often. The
opposite should be true for Danny
Amendola, who is the perfect replacement for Wes Welker
in New England and who should come close to the 100-catch mark
if he stays healthy.
Fantasy drafts are constantly evolving from the early days when
running backs were almost always the players selected (with exceptions)
in the earliest rounds. The trend then went to drafting wideouts
with those early picks, then on to passing quarterbacks and tight
ends. Now, with the option quarterback taking over, those players
will be coveted, and over-drafting becomes a real concern. Gathering
as much information as possible is key, and knowing which teams
are likely to use their players in the best possible way is more
important than ever.
|