| AFC South & AFC West Breakdowns
 8/5/09
 
 AFC South: HOU 
              | IND | JAX | TEN
 AFC West: DEN 
              | KC | OAK | SD
 
 Every owner wants to hit on the next big thing; that is no secret. 
              But it infuriates me how so-called expert after so-called expert 
              doesn't even mention the word "schedule" when it comes 
              to projecting player performance. Somewhere along with player talent 
              and age, team offensive philosophy and supporting cast, I believe 
              schedule analysis – when used correctly – provides a 
              huge advantage over the competition. Any veteran fantasy football 
              owner knows it is nearly pointless to use last season's numbers 
              as an indicator of how a defense will fare this season, which is 
              a big reason I go to the trouble of analyzing 
              defense like I did two weeks ago. It stands to reason that if 
              teams like Kansas City and Denver will once again struggle on defense 
              - even after all the changes both teams made - that I want to see 
              them more often on my fantasy players' schedule than I do on someone 
              else's. Likewise, why do I want any of my players facing Pittsburgh 
              in the fantasy playoffs?
 Last week in this space, 
                I tried to lobby each of you to consider the schedule for fantasy 
                purposes and presented some pretty daunting evidence as to why 
                owners should be thrilled to see teams from the AFC and NFC West 
                on their fantasy players' schedule. I mention this again for two 
                very important reasons: 1) it is pertinent considering that each 
                of the teams that I am spotlighting this week will be playing 
                against one or the other and 2) each top-place fantasy RB finisher 
                since the NFL moved to its current eight-division format prior 
                to the 2002 season has seen his team play at least four games 
                vs. the teams from the West. For the purposes of this article, 
                that would seem to be good news for the likes of Steve Slaton, 
                Chris Johnson, Maurice Jones-Drew and LaDainian Tomlinson, who 
                has obviously made his living in part by feasting on his own division, 
                scoring 53 of his 141 total TDs against the likes of Denver, Kansas 
                City and Oakland. But any fantasy owner worth his/her salt needs more than just 
                a strong case for RBs as to why he/she should subscribe to my 
                line of thinking. All I can say is this: in the passing game, 
                fantasy owners have to trust that offensive coordinators will 
                earn their paycheck by getting their players in the most advantageous 
                positions to score points for us. (However, not all of them do, 
                which is one reason why I spend so much of the offseason talking 
                about coordinators and their philosophies 
                in this space.) Conversely, we also have to believe most defensive 
                coordinators will do their best to shut down said weapons, but 
                due to any number of factors - including but not limited to lack 
                of personnel, ineffective schemes or general breakdown in coverage 
                - a top WR or TE may get his numbers anyway. Because very few 
                teams subscribe to the thinking of "our best corner vs. your 
                best WR" and even fewer teams have one specific safety or 
                linebacker who shadows an opponent's TE, sometimes all we have 
                is history to look back on to see how a player produced against 
                a similar defensive approach. But think of it this way: I don't need any of my wideouts going 
                against the Raiders' Nnamdi Asomugha or the Jets' Darrelle Revis 
                in any fantasy playoff game. Similarly, I'd just as soon not count 
                on my QB or TE - no matter how good he is - to put up his new 
                career-high total against Pittsburgh or Baltimore.  Bear in mind that while the final numbers are important, they 
                are 15-game totals because most fantasy seasons have a Week 16 
                title game. For those unfamiliar with the way I project player 
                stats and individual week-to-week consistency (or for those who 
                need a refresher), please give my PSA: 
                RB article a read for an introductory course in Preseason 
                Schedule Analysis. By now, I'm hoping that each of you have a 
                pretty good understanding of my methodology, so let's see how 
                I think the AFC South and AFC West shake down in 2009.
 Note: The grey 
                highlight in each team’s schedule reflects a road game. AFC SOUTH 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Houston Texans |   
                  |  | Totals | NYJ | TEN | JAX | OAK | ARI | CIN | SF | BUF | IND | bye | TEN | IND | JAX | SEA | STL | MIA |   
                        | (Run) |  | 3.8 | 4.1 | 4 | 4.9 | 4.4 | 4 | 4 | 4.5 | 4.1 |  | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 4.3 |   
                        | (Pass) |  | 6.5 | 6.5 | 7.2 | 6.9 | 6.7 | 6.3 | 7 | 7.4 | 6.1 |  | 6.5 | 6.1 | 7.2 | 7 | 7.6 | 7.2 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | M Schaub | 3785 | 215 | 260 | 260 | 190 | 270 | 280 | 305 | 240 | 195 |  | 220 | 265 | 325 | 230 | 265 | 265 |   
                        | TD | 23 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |  | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |   
                        | INT | 13 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | S Slaton | 1300 | 65 | 70 | 90 | 130 | 80 | 75 | 35 | 125 | 120 |  | 55 | 85 | 65 | 100 | 125 | 80 |   
                        | Ru 
                          TD | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | Re Yards | 380 | 15 | 10 | 20 | 10 | 40 | 25 | 65 | 25 | 0 |  | 25 | 10 | 75 | 20 | 0 | 40 |   
                        | Re 
                          TD | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        | Rec | 43 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 0 |  | 2 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 |   
                  | C Brown/ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | A Foster | 310 | 20 | 15 | 10 | 30 | 40 | 25 | 10 | 30 | 10 |  | 20 | 15 | 30 | 15 | 25 | 15 |   
                        | Ru 
                          TD | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        | Re 
                          Yards | 35 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 0 |  | 0 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |   
                        | Re TD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        | Rec | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | A Johnson | 1350 | 70 | 135 | 85 | 55 | 90 | 105 | 85 | 115 | 75 |  | 65 | 120 | 60 | 80 | 130 | 80 |   
                        | Re 
                          TD | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |   
                        | Rec | 105 | 6 | 11 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 7 |  | 5 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 11 | 6 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | K Walter | 945 | 55 | 35 | 70 | 100 | 60 | 50 | 75 | 50 | 65 |  | 80 | 55 | 80 | 75 | 40 | 55 |   
                        | Re 
                          TD | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        | Rec | 73 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 7 |  | 8 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 5 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | A Davis | 390 | 25 | 15 | 40 | 0 | 25 | 50 | 20 | 15 | 0 |  | 25 | 10 | 75 | 20 | 40 | 30 |   
                        | Re 
                          TD | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        | Rec | 25 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | O Daniels | 685 | 50 | 65 | 40 | 25 | 55 | 40 | 60 | 30 | 55 |  | 25 | 65 | 35 | 25 | 55 | 60 |   
                        | Re 
                          TD | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        | Rec | 61 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 6 |  | 1 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 7 |  |  While it may not be good for their actual playoff hopes, the 
                Texans figure to help any fantasy owner investing in their passing 
                game breathe a sigh of relief considering that Houston faces the 
                Jets in Week 1 and New England in Week 17. If any defenses on 
                the Texans' 2009 schedule have the scheme and talent in place 
                to silence their offensive attack, those would be the two, so 
                any owner heavily invested in Matt Schaub or Andre Johnson should 
                consider themselves pretty lucky. As it stands, only division 
                rivals Indianapolis and Tennessee stand out as defenses on Houston's 
                schedule that should challenge them in the passing game, although 
                I do expect strong defensive showings from Cincinnati and Seattle 
                this season. Even with that, I can only identify four matchups 
                that Johnson will be severely tested and just five games in which 
                Schaub may struggle - and that's assuming both the Colts and Titans 
                pick right up where they left off with new defensive coordinators! 
                In short, Schaub and Johnson are both set up to enjoy career years 
                if both can stay healthy, a notion that is no small concern. (Johnson 
                hasn't put together consecutive 16-game seasons since his first 
                two years in the league back in 2003-04 while Schaub has played 
                just 11 games in each of his first two seasons with Houston.) Much like the passing game, big things should also be in store 
                for the Texans' running game. There doesn't seem to be any consensus 
                yet on what will happen to Steve Slaton's goal-line carries. Slaton 
                added nearly 10 pounds in the offseason in order to hopefully 
                address the team's woes in red zone scoring (30th in the league 
                in 2008) and red zone touchdowns (26th). Conversely, HC Gary Kubiak 
                made several mentions during the offseason about his desire to 
                pair Slaton up with a bigger back. The head coach usually wins 
                these types of battles, but counting on Chris Brown for a full 
                season would be foolish and, while the team likes undrafted rookie 
                Arian Foster, one has to question whether the Texans will honestly 
                feel better taking the ball out of Slaton's hands inside the five-yard 
                line. Why does it matter? For a RB corps that accounted for over 
                2,200 total yards and 15 scores last season against the likes 
                of Pittsburgh, Baltimore and Tennessee (twice), the potential 
                is there for even more with only one negative matchup and the 
                NFC West on the schedule. For now, I'll believe that HC Gary Kubiak 
                lets Brown and Foster take the goal-line work, but the fact is 
                that if Slaton beats them both out, he could easily be the No. 
                1 overall fantasy draft pick in 2010.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Indianapolis Colts |   
                  |  | Totals | JAX | MIA | ARI | SEA | TEN | bye | STL | SF | HOU | NE | BAL | HOU | TEN | DEN | JAX | NYJ |   
                  | (Run) |  | 4 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.1 |  | 4.6 | 4 | 4.3 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 5 | 4 | 3.8 |   
                  | (Pass) |  | 7.2 | 7.2 | 6.7 | 7 | 6.5 |  | 7.6 | 7 | 7.2 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 7.2 | 6.5 | 6.8 | 7.2 | 6.5 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | P Manning | 3780 | 260 | 220 | 250 | 275 | 205 |  | 310 | 280 | 300 | 230 | 205 | 260 | 220 | 280 | 230 | 255 |   
                  | TD | 27 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 |  | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 |   
                  | INT | 11 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | J Addai | 860 | 55 | 30 | 75 | 55 | 40 |  | 90 | 45 | 60 | 40 | 35 | 80 | 60 | 105 | 35 | 55 |   
                  | Ru TD | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Re Yards | 335 | 25 | 15 | 35 | 15 | 5 |  | 35 | 15 | 30 | 20 | 35 | 10 | 40 | 5 | 30 | 20 |   
                  | Re TD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 45 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 |  | 5 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 3 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | D Brown | 680 | 35 | 45 | 35 | 50 | 25 |  | 55 | 85 | 55 | 45 | 50 | 30 | 30 | 65 | 45 | 30 |   
                  | Ru TD | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Re Yards | 105 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 5 |  | 0 | 10 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 10 |   
                  | Re TD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 19 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | R Wayne | 1045 | 80 | 40 | 65 | 75 | 30 |  | 110 | 85 | 90 | 55 | 45 | 100 | 45 | 55 | 85 | 85 |   
                  | Re TD | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                  | Rec | 83 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 2 |  | 7 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | A Gonzalez | 995 | 55 | 75 | 85 | 90 | 50 |  | 60 | 70 | 65 | 50 | 75 | 50 | 60 | 115 | 40 | 55 |   
                  | Re TD | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |   
                  | Rec | 72 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 4 |  | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 9 | 3 | 4 |   
                  | P Garcon/ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | A Collie | 520 | 35 | 45 | 20 | 30 | 45 |  | 55 | 35 | 40 | 45 | 30 | 40 | 35 | 15 | 30 | 20 |   
                  | Re TD | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 40 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 |  | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | D Clark | 780 | 60 | 45 | 35 | 55 | 70 |  | 50 | 65 | 75 | 40 | 20 | 45 | 35 | 80 | 40 | 65 |   
                  | Re TD | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 67 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 7 |  | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 |  |  Now that the most talked-about consultant role in the history 
                of the league has been clarified, the Colts should retain their 
                place among the elite offenses in the league. Late last month, 
                the league informed its teams that consultants such as former 
                OC Tom Moore and ex-OL coach Howard Mudd would be allowed to take 
                on as much of a role as the team wanted, meaning Moore and Mudd 
                will be able to assume their old roles with the team, in a matter 
                of speaking. Unlike the Texans' slate, the Colts' schedule is 
                much more heavily backloaded with potential negative matchups. 
                Even though Indianapolis has mostly neutral matchups in the first 
                eight games, that fact is somewhat negated by the notion that 
                four of the Colts' next seven games are against some fairly tough 
                projected defenses. Note that I have the Jaguars listed as a neutral 
                matchup as well, so Indy could easily slide a bit offensively 
                in the second half of the season. It should come as some relief, 
                though, that only the Jets are a team Indy is not intimately familiar 
                with, but even then, the Colts are no stranger to Rex Ryan's pressure 
                defense either. Fantasy owners shouldn't expect much more output 
                from Peyton Manning, Dallas Clark or Reggie Wayne than they gave 
                us a season ago, but a serious upgrade needs to be considered 
                for Anthony Gonzalez, as the absence of Marvin Harrison should 
                allow him to double the 57 targets he saw a season ago. The most 
                likely player to step into Gonzalez's old role will be Pierre 
                Garcon, who carries a fair amount of super-sleeper potential. It wasn't long ago that Joseph Addai was the next big thing, 
                but after an injury-plagued season for him and his offensive line, 
                the former LSU standout goes from sure-fire first-round fantasy 
                pick to a committee back. While the workload split should still 
                be 60-40 in Addai's favor, it may not take a lot of persuasion 
                from first-round pick Donald Brown to make this backfield a true 
                RBBC. With that said, the schedule (and the Colts' health up front) 
                lines up nicely for an early-season bounceback from Addai. For 
                right now, Addai is the more complete back of the two and is certainly 
                the most trusted option of the two in the passing game. However, 
                while the passing game has the strength to survive the second 
                half of the Colts' schedule, fantasy owners should be advised 
                that a committee backfield vs. the likes of the Patriots, Ravens 
                and Jets during the most important weeks of the season is not 
                the ideal way to wrap up a fantasy league championship. If Addai 
                cannot complete a full season once again, Brown has more than 
                enough skill to step up and carry his owners, so he certainly 
                qualifies as a fairly low-risk, potential high-reward RB.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Jacksonville Jaguars |   
                  |  | Totals | IND | ARI | HOU | TEN | SEA | STL | bye | TEN | KC | NYJ | BUF | SF | HOU | MIA | IND | NE |   
                  | (Run) |  | 4.1 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.6 |  | 4.1 | 4.9 | 3.8 | 4.5 | 4 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 3.9 |   
                  | (Pass) |  | 6.1 | 6.7 | 7.2 | 6.5 | 7 | 7.6 |  | 6.5 | 7.5 | 6.5 | 7.4 | 7 | 7.2 | 7.2 | 6.1 | 6.2 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | D Garrard | 2815 | 210 | 170 | 185 | 150 | 185 | 165 |  | 230 | 150 | 160 | 245 | 190 | 200 | 215 | 200 | 160 |   
                  | TD | 14 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | INT | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |   
                        | Ru 
                          Yards | 250 | 15 | 30 | 25 | 10 | 0 | 15 |  | 15 | 35 | 10 | 25 | 0 | 30 | 15 | 10 | 15 |   
                  | Ru TD | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | M Jones-Drew | 1335 | 90 | 115 | 85 | 60 | 85 | 130 |  | 40 | 105 | 60 | 115 | 70 | 95 | 80 | 120 | 85 |   
                  | Ru TD | 14 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |  | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |   
                  | Re Yards | 505 | 45 | 30 | 20 | 45 | 15 | 10 |  | 55 | 25 | 25 | 65 | 25 | 20 | 50 | 45 | 30 |   
                  | Re TD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 59 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 1 |  | 7 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 4 |   
                  | R Jennings/ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | G Jones | 315 | 25 | 15 | 25 | 10 | 25 | 20 |  | 15 | 35 | 10 | 30 | 15 | 20 | 10 | 25 | 35 |   
                  | Ru TD | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                  | Re Yards | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |  | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 |   
                  | Re TD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | T Holt | 875 | 50 | 65 | 55 | 35 | 80 | 90 |  | 50 | 40 | 25 | 105 | 60 | 75 | 60 | 40 | 45 |   
                  | Re TD | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 66 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 6 |  | 3 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 4 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | M Walker | 610 | 50 | 30 | 40 | 30 | 35 | 20 |  | 65 | 50 | 45 | 25 | 45 | 30 | 60 | 50 | 35 |   
                  | Re TD | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 44 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 |  | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | M Thomas | 485 | 45 | 30 | 45 | 25 | 35 | 45 |  | 35 | 0 | 50 | 35 | 20 | 55 | 20 | 25 | 20 |   
                  | Re TD | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 38 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 |  | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | M Lewis | 305 | 20 | 15 | 25 | 5 | 20 | 0 |  | 20 | 35 | 10 | 15 | 40 | 15 | 25 | 40 | 20 |   
                  | Re TD | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 36 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 |  | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 |  |  It would come as a surprise to no one if Maurice 
                Jones-Drew emerged as fantasy's best RB this season. He is 
                a complete back with no viable threat pushing him for touches 
                in the Jags' backfield. In three seasons, he has scored 38 rushing 
                or receiving TDs, so he obviously has a nose for the end zone. 
                Moreover, Jacksonville should start this season with a much better 
                and healthier offensive line after adding rookies Eugene Monroe 
                and Eben Britton along with free agent Tra Thomas. Last but not 
                least, there is not a lot of red on MJD's schedule and he has 
                the benefit of padding his numbers against the likes of the Rams 
                and Chiefs. In fact, only the Jets and Patriots qualify as defenses 
                on the 2009 schedule who strike me as teams who could bottle up 
                Jones-Drew. But as we have seen already, "Pocket Hercules" is 
                one of the few RBs in the league who can consistently produce 
                no matter the opponent, much like a young Brian Westbrook. The 
                biggest question will be whether or not the Jags elect to take 
                some of MJD's red zone touches from him in order to preserve him 
                (the team has some pounders behind him), but it would seem ridiculous 
                to remove him from the goal line when he has established himself 
                as one of the best in the league in that role and is compact enough 
                to handle the punishment. Assuming the Jags will return to their run-heavy ways and with 
                the lack of an elite receiving threat, it's hard to hand out many 
                favorable matchups to any of the members of Jacksonville's passing 
                game. What this team does have is receiving talent, so it is conceivable 
                that David Garrard takes advantage and puts up some surprising 
                passing yards (like he did last year) while also posting a stellar 
                TD:INT ratio (like he did in 2007). In all honesty, the six red 
                matchups could end up being as few as two if the Jags open things 
                up and teams like the Colts and Titans fail to react favorably 
                to their new defensive coordinators. Despite being on the downside 
                of his career, Torry Holt is undoubtedly the most dependable target 
                (on and off the field) Garrard has enjoyed since becoming the 
                team's #1 QB midway through the 2006 season. Pairing him up for 
                16 games with a healthy Mike Walker (always a question mark) would 
                make Garrard a viable mix-and-match fantasy starter and give the 
                running game even more opportunity to pound opponents.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Tennessee Titans |   
                  |  | Totals | PIT | HOU | NYJ | JAX | IND | NE | bye | JAX | SF | BUF | HOU | ARI | IND | STL | MIA | SD |   
                  | (Run) |  | 3.4 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 4 | 4.1 | 3.9 |  | 4 | 4 | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 4.1 |   
                  | (Pass) |  | 5.6 | 7.2 | 6.5 | 7.2 | 6.1 | 6.2 |  | 7.2 | 7 | 7.4 | 7.2 | 6.7 | 6.1 | 7.6 | 7.2 | 6.6 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | K Collins | 3125 | 185 | 205 | 220 | 215 | 180 | 235 |  | 195 | 225 | 190 | 255 | 230 | 150 | 215 | 225 | 200 |   
                  | TD | 15 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |  | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | INT | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | C Johnson | 1335 | 70 | 90 | 55 | 85 | 110 | 40 |  | 115 | 70 | 135 | 65 | 120 | 80 | 140 | 75 | 85 |   
                  | Ru TD | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |   
                  | Re Yards | 330 | 5 | 15 | 25 | 35 | 20 | 50 |  | 25 | 5 | 20 | 25 | 20 | 5 | 15 | 25 | 40 |   
                  | Re TD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 39 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 5 |  | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | L White | 590 | 25 | 35 | 25 | 45 | 30 | 35 |  | 55 | 40 | 45 | 50 | 30 | 25 | 55 | 80 | 15 |   
                  | Ru TD | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |   
                  | Re Yards | 55 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 0 |  | 5 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 |   
                  | Re TD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | N Washington | 795 | 55 | 55 | 30 | 45 | 60 | 35 |  | 40 | 55 | 70 | 50 | 55 | 50 | 100 | 35 | 60 |   
                  | Re TD | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 51 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 |  | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | J Gage | 815 | 50 | 75 | 50 | 70 | 55 | 45 |  | 40 | 85 | 55 | 65 | 40 | 45 | 35 | 75 | 30 |   
                  | Re TD | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 65 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 4 |  | 4 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | K Britt | 415 | 20 | 15 | 40 | 20 | 0 | 25 |  | 55 | 25 | 30 | 25 | 35 | 0 | 45 | 55 | 25 |   
                  | Re TD | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 28 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | B Scaife | 625 | 35 | 45 | 60 | 45 | 35 | 65 |  | 30 | 45 | 15 | 55 | 70 | 45 | 10 | 30 | 40 |   
                  | Re TD | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 67 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 8 |  | 3 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | A Crumpler | 90 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 15 |  | 0 | 5 | 0 | 25 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 5 |   
                  | Re TD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  |  As is usually the case with HC Jeff Fisher's teams, the offense 
                begins and ends with the running game, all the while hoping the 
                passing game does just enough to get by. The same could be said 
                for the Titans' first-half slate, which presents the team with 
                the stiffest challenges it figures to face all season. The Steelers, 
                Jets and Pats are three of Tennessee's first four road games, 
                all of which come prior to the team's Week 7 bye. As a result, 
                a slow start by Chris 
                Johnson and LenDale 
                White (to a lesser degree) should not be ruled out. With that 
                said, the post-bye slate opens up quite nicely for Johnson as 
                only the Dolphins and Chargers (during the fantasy playoffs) project 
                as defenses that should be expected to mount any kind of resistance 
                against the Titans' running game, although the Jags and Niners 
                could stand up to them more than expected. Johnson has as strong 
                of a case as Jones-Drew or Slaton for becoming not only the division’s 
                best fantasy player, but also the league's most valuable fantasy 
                property at RB. He is an adept receiver while his offensive line 
                – which returns in full after a dominant showing from last season 
                – is the most established of the three. Just like the running game, the Titans should be forgiven if 
                the Steelers, Jets, Colts and Pats stymie their passing game before 
                the bye. Nate Washington and Justin Gage will go up against some 
                solid CBs after that, but it could be argued the Cardinals and 
                Chargers have the most talent in the defensive backfield of any 
                team Tennessee faces in the second half. While I expect a return 
                to form from San Diego, Arizona seriously downgraded in my opinion 
                when it fired former DC Clancy Pendergast and hired Bill Davis 
                as his replacement. Thus, only two teams strike me as opponents 
                who will serve as a serious deterrent when the Titans want to 
                go play-action and hit Washington (and possibly rookie Kenny Britt) 
                down the field. It should be noted that while I expect Bo Scaife 
                and Gage to lead the team in receptions, it would not be a bit 
                surprising to me if Washington scores 6-7 times and becomes the 
                receiver opponents start game-planning for late in the season. 
                Given the nature of the offense and the likelihood that Kerry 
                Collins makes it through another full season at his age, he shouldn't 
                be counted on for much in fantasy circles. However, with better 
                weapons and a full training camp as the starter under his belt, 
                his per-game numbers should markedly improve in 2009.
  AFC WEST 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Denver Broncos |   
                  |  | Totals | CIN | CLE | OAK | DAL | NE | SD | bye | BAL | PIT | WAS | SD | NYG | KC | IND | OAK | PHI |   
                  | (Run) |  | 4 | 4.3 | 4.9 | 4 | 3.9 | 4.1 |  | 3.8 | 3.4 | 3.7 | 4.1 | 3.8 | 4.9 | 4.1 | 4.9 | 3.8 |   
                  | (Pass) |  | 6.3 | 7.2 | 6.9 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 6.6 |  | 6.2 | 5.6 | 6 | 6.6 | 6.6 | 7.5 | 6.1 | 6.9 | 6.4 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | K Orton | 3520 | 245 | 270 | 225 | 225 | 320 | 265 |  | 200 | 195 | 225 | 230 | 220 | 240 | 190 | 240 | 230 |   
                  | TD | 20 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 |  | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |   
                  | INT | 16 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | K Moreno | 1075 | 60 | 100 | 110 | 50 | 60 | 40 |  | 30 | 55 | 75 | 85 | 65 | 110 | 55 | 115 | 65 |   
                  | Ru TD | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |   
                  | Re Yards | 350 | 20 | 15 | 15 | 40 | 50 | 20 |  | 35 | 0 | 15 | 25 | 15 | 40 | 15 | 5 | 40 |   
                  | Re TD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 46 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 3 |  | 4 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 6 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | L Jordan | 245 | 15 | 15 | 25 | 10 | 40 | 15 |  | 10 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 15 | 35 | 10 | 0 | 25 |   
                  | Ru TD | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Re Yards | 35 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10 |  | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |   
                  | Re TD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | C Buckhalter | 265 | 25 | 15 | 30 | 10 | 0 | 30 |  | 10 | 15 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 25 |   
                  | Ru TD | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                  | Re Yards | 50 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |  | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |   
                  | Re TD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | B Marshall | 1010 | 75 | 100 | 45 | 70 | 90 | 65 |  | 55 | 110 | 80 | 35 | 85 | 70 | 45 | 30 | 55 |   
                  | Re TD | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                  | Rec | 80 | 6 | 9 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 7 |  | 6 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | E Royal | 955 | 65 | 55 | 100 | 65 | 85 | 75 |  | 35 | 65 | 60 | 65 | 40 | 45 | 55 | 75 | 70 |   
                  | Re TD | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 73 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 5 |  | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | B Stokley | 315 | 40 | 20 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 15 |  | 15 | 0 | 25 | 45 | 15 | 0 | 25 | 40 | 15 |   
                  | Re TD | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 29 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 |  | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | J Gaffney | 265 | 15 | 25 | 10 | 15 | 40 | 15 |  | 15 | 0 | 20 | 20 | 15 | 10 | 15 | 35 | 15 |   
                  | Re TD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 26 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | T Scheffler | 500 | 25 | 40 | 40 | 15 | 15 | 55 |  | 40 | 15 | 15 | 40 | 25 | 70 | 30 | 55 | 20 |   
                  | Re TD | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 44 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 |  | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 |  |  Earlier in the offseason, I made a bold statement when I proclaimed 
                that Kyle Orton would outproduce Jay Cutler. I may need to reverse 
                course on that one (right now I have them finishing in the same 
                neighborhood), but not because I believe Cutler is that much better. 
                As with just about every judgment I make in fantasy football, 
                I base my opinion on the schedule and current events. As schedules 
                go, this entire division will have it rough in 2009, especially 
                the Broncos. The Bengals got a neutral ranking, but could easily 
                finish as a top 10 defense this season. Cleveland and Oakland 
                should give Denver a bit of a break, but after that, the Broncos 
                embark on an unforgiving nine-week stretch that any offense would 
                find difficult, let alone one trying to find its way with a new 
                offensive system. During the run, the Broncos face three of the 
                four teams from the NFC East, Baltimore, Pittsburgh, New England 
                and San Diego (twice). To top things off, they have two more challenging 
                road contests vs. the Colts and Eagles during many owners' fantasy 
                playoffs. Regarding the current events I mentioned above, Brandon 
                Marshall's recovery from offseason hip surgery further complicates 
                matters as he is having trouble making it through a full practice 
                so far in camp. A full recovery from his surgery is supposed to 
                take between 6-12 months and September only gets him to most optimistic 
                outlook (no wonder he wanted a new deal done over the summer). 
                Because Denver has such a deep and talented offensive supporting 
                cast, Orton could actually see his way through and put up some 
                decent fantasy performances, but I no longer am entertaining any 
                thoughts of him emerging as a top-10 QB option this season. If 
                Marshall is only a shell of himself for 2009, Eddie Royal stands 
                to benefit the most although Jabar Gaffney would likely become 
                a starter if the man-child WR needed to miss time. In the off 
                chance Marshall completely overcomes his injury woes and contract 
                squabbles, he and Royal should maintain some semblance of fantasy 
                relevance but the schedule could potentially squash the value 
                of the rest of the passing game. The one saving grace for Orton, 
                Marshall and Royal is that since the Broncos defense figures to 
                finish among the league’s worst again this season, the trio 
                may be able to pad their passing and receiving totals while attempting 
                a late comeback or during garbage time. Thankfully, the running game doesn't have it quite as tough as 
                the passing game, but I am also not quite as high (as I was earlier 
                this summer) on this part of the Broncos' offense. Because the 
                Broncos have such a proficient run-blocking line, they should 
                be able to get Knowshon Moreno near the 1,000-yard mark despite 
                six poor matchups, although he needs to report to camp soon and 
                assert his rightful place as the unquestioned lead back for that 
                to happen. While I don't believe it would be in the team's best 
                interests to pull the rookie out and insert LaMont Jordan for 
                short-yardage work, apparently the team does, so Moreno could 
                disappoint in the scoring department. If his fantasy owners can 
                deal with a rollercoaster ride during the heart of Denver's schedule, 
                he could reward his owners over the final four weeks when he should 
                have a couple of opportunities to shine against division rivals 
                Kansas City and Oakland. Indy may also struggle against the run 
                and it would come as no surprise to me if the passing of DC Jim 
                Johnson leaves the Eagles as an unpredictable defense week in 
                and week out in 2009. Given his abilities as a receiver, I expect 
                Moreno to be much more consistent in PPR leagues for the simple 
                fact that: 1) he will be the team's third-down back and 2) considering 
                the number of aggressive defenses on the schedule, Denver will 
                probably run its fair share of screens and swing passes on the 
                early downs to slow down the pass rush.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Kansas City Chiefs |   
                  |  | Totals | BAL | OAK | PHI | NYG | DAL | WAS | SD | bye | JAX | OAK | PIT | SD | DEN | BUF | CLE | CIN |   
                  | (Run) |  | 3.8 | 4.9 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 4 | 3.7 | 4.1 |  | 4 | 4.9 | 3.4 | 4.1 | 5 | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4 |   
                  | (Pass) |  | 6.2 | 6.9 | 6.4 | 6.6 | 6.1 | 6 | 6.6 |  | 7.2 | 6.9 | 5.6 | 6.6 | 6.8 | 7.4 | 7.2 | 6.3 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | M Cassel | 3015 | 175 | 215 | 160 | 170 | 165 | 225 | 230 |  | 175 | 210 | 120 | 185 | 220 | 295 | 235 | 235 |   
                  | TD | 16 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |  | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |   
                  | INT | 16 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |   
                  | Ru Yards | 285 | 20 | 30 | 15 | 0 | 20 | 10 | 20 |  | 35 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 35 | 15 | 40 | 30 |   
                  | Ru TD | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | L Johnson | 895 | 25 | 80 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 45 | 75 |  | 55 | 45 | 35 | 45 | 110 | 65 | 80 | 55 |   
                  | Ru TD | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | Re Yards | 90 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 10 |  | 5 | 15 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 |   
                  | Re TD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 14 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | J Charles | 330 | 15 | 25 | 35 | 20 | 10 | 20 | 10 |  | 30 | 25 | 15 | 50 | 15 | 25 | 10 | 25 |   
                  | Ru TD | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Re Yards | 325 | 25 | 15 | 25 | 10 | 30 | 45 | 20 |  | 15 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 40 | 25 | 30 | 25 |   
                  | Re TD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 43 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 4 |  | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | D Bowe | 1130 | 65 | 85 | 50 | 85 | 60 | 85 | 75 |  | 90 | 50 | 40 | 55 | 80 | 120 | 105 | 85 |   
                  | Re TD | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 97 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 6 |  | 7 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 9 | 8 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | M Bradley | 775 | 45 | 55 | 60 | 40 | 25 | 70 | 50 |  | 35 | 75 | 25 | 55 | 65 | 70 | 45 | 60 |   
                  | Re TD | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 61 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 3 |  | 3 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | B Engram | 400 | 20 | 40 | 25 | 15 | 35 | 10 | 45 |  | 25 | 40 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 45 | 20 | 40 |   
                  | Re TD | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 42 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 5 |  | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | B Cottam | 285 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 15 | 30 |  | 5 | 30 | 15 | 45 | 15 | 30 | 35 | 20 |   
                  | Re TD | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                  | Rec | 29 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 |  | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 |  |  As I mentioned in earlier columns, the Chiefs cleaned house at 
                the top. But, as we know with any project worth doing right, it's 
                going to take some time to get Arrowhead Stadium rocking again 
                eight or more times a season. And as far as the schedule, new 
                HC Todd Haley couldn't timed his first head coaching job any worse 
                as far as walking into a situation in which he was able to build 
                his team's confidence early on with a few hard-fought wins against 
                some weak opponents. By the time Kansas City hits its Week 8 bye, 
                it will have faced five of last season's top eight defenses (Baltimore 
                and the entire NFC East). As a result, it is really hard to find 
                much to love about the running game. It appears that Haley will 
                let holdover OC Chan Gailey make the play calls with the team 
                operating out of the spread more often than not. While Larry Johnson 
                was able to enjoy moderate success out of the spread, he isn't 
                a good fit for the scheme and his schedule doesn't figure to help 
                him out any in that regard. Depending how healthy (physically 
                and emotionally) they are after the break, the Chiefs do get a 
                bit of a reprieve in the second half of the season as four of 
                the worst run defenses (according to my projections) make up half 
                of the remaining slate of games. But because I know of no fantasy 
                owner who can afford to sit his RB2 for 50% of the season in any 
                year, draft LJ as a RB3 if you decide to take him. The fact he 
                is turning 30 during the season, is unpredictable off the field 
                and runs behind a below-average line should only convince you 
                further that he isn't worth the trouble in 2009. Things weren't going to be easy for the Chiefs this season even 
                with Tony 
                Gonzalez, but trading away the most complete TE of his time 
                will only put more burden on the passing game. While the trade 
                was the right thing to do to help a team icon play for a contender 
                and a good move for the Chiefs’ future, the team has put an inordinate 
                amount of pressure on Matt 
                Cassel - who is already learning a new offense, along with 
                the rest of the team - but also Dwayne 
                Bowe, who should now be mercilessly double-teamed. When healthy, 
                Mark Bradley 
                is a more-than-capable real-life WR2 for this team while free 
                agent pickup Bobby 
                Engram is only a season removed from a 94-catch campaign in 
                Seattle. Unfortunately, the former can't seem to consistently 
                stay on the field and the latter is a 36-year-old who played hurt 
                last season but also looked nothing he did in 2007. If that wasn't 
                enough, Kansas City gets even fewer breaks from its schedule. 
                When they aren't facing the likes of stellar team defenses like 
                Baltimore, Philly, Pittsburgh or the Giants, Bowe gets the pleasure 
                of facing Asomugha and Antonio Cromartie twice as well as Rashean 
                Mathis and Champ Bailey. Because he is such a talent and KC has 
                few other attractive options, Bowe may very well set career highs 
                all across the board despite all the attention he will receive. 
                My biggest fear for this offense, however, is the likelihood that 
                Cassel will miss some games. While there is something to be said 
                about a new QB having a full offseason and training camp knowing 
                that he is the starter, Cassel took 47 sacks behind a pretty good 
                Patriots line. Therefore, it is conceivable that if he doesn't 
                speed up his reads for this season, he could give David Carr's 
                record-breaking 76-sack season in 2002 a run for the money. While 
                the left side of KC's line is strong, the right side will be where 
                opponents attack and neither LJ nor Jamaal 
                Charles will be mistaken as great pass blockers in blitz pickup. 
                The point to all this is that while I have Cassel projected for 
                15 games above, I highly doubt he will make it that far.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Oakland Raiders |   
                  |  | Totals | SD | KC | DEN | HOU | NYG | PHI | NYJ | SD | bye | KC | CIN | DAL | PIT | WAS | DEN | CLE |   
                  | (Run) |  | 4.1 | 4.9 | 5 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 4.1 |  | 4.9 | 4 | 4 | 3.4 | 3.7 | 5 | 4.3 |   
                  | (Pass) |  | 6.6 | 7.5 | 6.8 | 7.2 | 6.6 | 6.4 | 6.5 | 6.6 |  | 7.5 | 6.3 | 6.1 | 5.6 | 6 | 6.8 | 7.2 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | J Russell | 2635 | 195 | 185 | 175 | 215 | 170 | 100 | 180 | 195 |  | 210 | 180 | 190 | 80 | 185 | 180 | 195 |   
                  | TD | 13 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |   
                  | INT | 13 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |   
                  | Ru Yards | 120 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 10 |  | 20 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 10 |   
                  | Ru TD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | D McFadden | 940 | 70 | 110 | 85 | 55 | 30 | 70 | 45 | 45 |  | 55 | 70 | 45 | 35 | 55 | 70 | 100 |   
                  | Ru TD | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                  | Re Yards | 280 | 20 | 0 | 15 | 20 | 30 | 15 | 35 | 20 |  | 15 | 25 | 25 | 5 | 20 | 15 | 20 |   
                  | Re TD | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 33 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 |  | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | M Bush | 785 | 45 | 55 | 65 | 70 | 45 | 30 | 60 | 55 |  | 90 | 20 | 50 | 20 | 35 | 100 | 45 |   
                  | Ru TD | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | Re Yards | 115 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 10 |  | 10 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 15 | 5 |   
                  | Re TD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 14 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | J Fargas | 330 | 20 | 30 | 20 | 15 | 20 | 40 | 10 | 15 |  | 35 | 15 | 25 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 25 |   
                  | Ru TD | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Re Yards | 40 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |  | 5 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 |   
                  | Re TD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | C Schilens | 360 | 35 | 40 | 15 | 50 | 20 | 0 | 10 | 15 |  | 55 | 30 | 10 | 15 | 50 | 0 | 15 |   
                  | Re TD | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 26 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | JL Higgins | 415 | 40 | 35 | 25 | 25 | 30 | 15 | 20 | 40 |  | 35 | 35 | 20 | 0 | 40 | 25 | 30 |   
                  | Re TD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 36 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |  | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 2 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | L Murphy | 515 | 25 | 40 | 55 | 35 | 20 | 10 | 55 | 30 |  | 35 | 45 | 25 | 35 | 15 | 55 | 35 |   
                  | Re TD | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 40 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 |  | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | D Heyward-Bey | 215 | 0 | 25 | 25 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 |  | 15 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 30 |   
                  | Re TD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | Z Miller | 695 | 65 | 30 | 40 | 30 | 55 | 50 | 25 | 80 |  | 40 | 35 | 70 | 25 | 45 | 45 | 60 |   
                  | Re TD | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |   
                  | Rec | 59 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 7 |  | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 6 |  |  It’s hard to believe in this day and age that an NFL offense 
                could be inept at passing the football. Believe it or not, it 
                doesn't figure to get any better so long as JaMarcus 
                Russell continues to pretend he never left college. Until 
                football becomes important enough to the talented signal caller 
                so he shows up to camp in shape and spends his offseasons working 
                on routes with his receivers, all he will be is an enigma at best. 
                Russell shouldn't be handed all the blame; he has arguably the 
                least talented group of receivers in the league catching his passes 
                and an owner who believes that upgrading that position means finding 
                the fastest player. Russell does have TE Zach 
                Miller, however, who is a stud trapped in a running offense 
                with an inaccurate QB. Interestingly, the lack of receivers actually 
                works in Miller’s favor, though, so not all is lost. In the Raiders' 
                passing game, he is the one player opponents need to game plan 
                for each week. Since the AFC West was a pretty gracious division 
                when it came to defending the TE a season ago and Kansas City 
                and Denver should remain as shaky on defense, Miller should have 
                enough opportunity to repeat his 2008 numbers, at the very least. 
                Unfortunately, there are at least six teams that should have the 
                personnel necessary to keep him in check, so the onus falls back 
                on a receiving corps that is hoping for a dramatic increase of 
                production from young wideouts Chaz 
                Schilens and Johnnie 
                Lee Higgins. Help is one the way, but the most immediate impact 
                player may very well be rookie Louis Murphy, not 2009 No. 7 overall 
                pick Darius Heyward-Bey or 2008 prize free agent Javon 
                Walker. Fantasy owners should consider 2009 a redshirt season 
                for DHB because it is becoming fairly obvious he is every bit 
                as raw as his consistency in college suggested he was. As for 
                Walker, he is saying all the right things after undergoing a top-secret 
                offseason surgery, but it is anyone's guess what his future holds 
                in Oakland. Any improvement the passing game makes over 2008 should only 
                benefit a healthy Darren McFadden. While he will contribute to 
                Russell's bottom line and could possibly be the team's second-leading 
                receiver this year, it would be a major upset if he doesn't see 
                something in the neighborhood of 225 carries. The second-year 
                speedster was hobbled by a toe injury for most of last season, 
                but HC Tom Cable saw enough in last season's game tape to convince 
                himself the Raiders were noticeably better when McFadden was in 
                the game. So assuming a similar injury doesn't befall him in 2009, 
                the former Razorback should start living up to his draft position 
                this year. If the Raiders have anything going for them on offense, 
                it is the fact they can run block and feature a zone-blocking 
                system that complements DMC's athletic ability well. His role 
                seems to be secure; he will get his touches. The great debate 
                appears to be who will share his workload more often: Justin Fargas 
                or Michael Bush. Bush impressed during a brief stint late last 
                season and is easily the more gifted of the two backs, but Cable 
                loves the lift that Fargas brings to the team with his hard-charging 
                style. How much it will matter again depends on the passing game, 
                because a repeat of 2008 won't allow any Oakland RB to score all 
                that much if Russell & Co. doesn't pick it up. Schedule-wise, 
                things get interesting during Weeks 15-16, when Oakland should 
                have ample opportunity to dominate on the ground in road games 
                vs. Denver and Cleveland. Just like the rest of their division, 
                the Raiders have to contend with some of the best defenses in 
                the league from the NFC East and AFC North, so a repeat of a top-10 
                finish in rushing appears unlikely.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | San Diego Chargers |   
                  |  | Totals | OAK | BAL | MIA | PIT | bye | DEN | KC | OAK | NYG | PHI | DEN | KC | CLE | DAL | CIN | TEN |   
                  | (Run) |  | 4.9 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 3.4 |  | 5 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 5 | 4.9 | 4.3 | 4 | 4 | 4.1 |   
                  | (Pass) |  | 6.9 | 6.2 | 7.2 | 5.6 |  | 6.8 | 7.5 | 6.9 | 6.6 | 6.4 | 6.8 | 7.5 | 7.2 | 6.1 | 6.3 | 6.5 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | P Rivers | 3715 | 265 | 175 | 285 | 200 |  | 305 | 245 | 265 | 300 | 200 | 235 | 255 | 260 | 275 | 250 | 200 |   
                  | TD | 28 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 |  | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 |   
                  | INT | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | L Tomlinson | 1255 | 85 | 45 | 75 | 55 |  | 130 | 105 | 110 | 55 | 75 | 105 | 100 | 90 | 60 | 90 | 75 |   
                  | Ru TD | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |   
                  | Re Yards | 325 | 20 | 15 | 30 | 15 |  | 40 | 20 | 10 | 25 | 30 | 0 | 20 | 50 | 20 | 20 | 10 |   
                  | Re TD | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 46 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 |  | 5 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | D Sproles | 365 | 25 | 5 | 45 | 10 |  | 35 | 20 | 15 | 25 | 10 | 40 | 65 | 15 | 20 | 15 | 20 |   
                  | Ru TD | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Re Yards | 365 | 25 | 25 | 10 | 20 |  | 25 | 15 | 55 | 10 | 25 | 40 | 30 | 15 | 25 | 20 | 25 |   
                  | Re TD | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 34 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 |  | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | V Jackson | 960 | 60 | 40 | 100 | 35 |  | 70 | 100 | 40 | 70 | 35 | 50 | 110 | 75 | 55 | 75 | 45 |   
                  | Re TD | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 60 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 |  | 6 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 2 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | C Chambers | 865 | 55 | 50 | 65 | 60 |  | 85 | 50 | 60 | 45 | 75 | 40 | 60 | 55 | 65 | 45 | 55 |   
                  | Re TD | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 59 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 |  | 6 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 4 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | M Floyd | 310 | 30 | 0 | 20 | 15 |  | 35 | 0 | 25 | 40 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 15 | 30 | 40 | 25 |   
                  | Re TD | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 18 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 |   
                  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                  | A Gates | 890 | 75 | 45 | 60 | 55 |  | 50 | 60 | 75 | 110 | 35 | 70 | 35 | 50 | 80 | 50 | 40 |   
                  | Re TD | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                  | Rec | 74 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 4 |  | 3 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 3 |  |  Much to my amazement, I have the Chargers as having the easiest 
              "run schedule" this season in terms of YPC allowed, something 
              that was rather shocking to me considering the presence of the AFC 
              North and NFC East on the schedule. But they get a few breaks that 
              the other AFC West teams do not: 1) their "fantasy schedule" 
              (Weeks 1-16) does not include Washington (they play in Week 17) 
              – every other team in this division faces all four NFC West 
              teams during their fantasy schedule and 2) the Raiders, Chiefs and 
              Broncos all possess below-average defenses, giving the Chargers 
              six games in which they should be able to flex their muscles. As 
              a result, I have San Diego slated for only four difficult run matchups, 
              including none after Week 10. LaDainian Tomlinson typically takes 
              the first month to get going (as he sits out the preseason), so 
              it just as well his two toughest games come in that time vs. the 
              Steelers and Ravens. It isn't lost on me that LT has become something 
              of a health risk in recent seasons, but I don't mind putting my 
              chips on the table for a RB who has yet to miss a regular season 
              game because of an injury and is coming off a "down year" 
              in which he finished seventh among fantasy running backs in traditional, 
              non-PPR scoring formats. No one is counting on LT to turn back the 
              clock to 2006, but what he pulled off last season despite a nagging 
              turf toe and a serious groin injury speaks to his incredible ability, 
              not to the falloff many expect for a back that just turned 30. Age 
              will catch up to him eventually, but it would come as no surprise 
              to me if he makes a few owners upset at themselves for passing on 
              him at the top of the first round. The offensive line woes from 
              last season have been addressed, LT is reportedly in great shape 
              and has enjoyed an injury-free offseason and HC Norv Turner is committed 
              to getting him another 320 carries this season.
 Over the years, San Diego has become more proficient in the passing 
                game, probably to the point now where it relies on Philip 
                Rivers just as much as it does on LT, if not more so. That 
                point has really been driven home over the past couple of seasons, 
                especially since Rivers has matured into one of the league's best 
                QBs, in part because any of his three main receivers could go 
                for 100+ yards, two TDs or both in any game. Turner has long been 
                able to get the best out of his QBs and another year with Rivers 
                should only mean more headaches for opponents. Last season could 
                have been a career year for Rivers - as a repeat of seven 3-TD 
                games seems unlikely against the aforementioned schedule - but 
                it could have just as well been a launching-off point for him, 
                too. For now, I've conservatively predicted a small dropoff in 
                the TD department for him (mostly because I expect the Chargers 
                to run more effectively), but an injury to LT or a repeat of the 
                run-blocking issues from a season ago could easily boost Rivers' 
                totals on the levels they reached last season. With the talent 
                and depth San Diego has, only the Steelers and Giants strike me 
                as teams that may hold this offense down for four quarters. Gates 
                is said to be healthy as well, so I have little reservation saying 
                he could reclaim his title as fantasy's best TE. With Vincent 
                Jackson and Chris 
                Chambers around, Gates will no longer monopolize all the receiving 
                scores from Rivers as he did earlier in his career. But, just 
                like LT, Gates is in good shape after an offseason to recover 
                from a lingering toe injury - I fully expect his end-of-the-year 
                numbers will reflect that.
 |