|  
                
  
 A d v e r t i s e m e n t  As promised, let’s pay our respects to the kickers and 
                defense/special teams units that help us decide our fantasy fates 
                each and every season…once again, these are 15-game projections.
  Let’s revisit the color-coding system before we start:
 Red – A very difficult matchup. 
                For lower-level players, a red matchup means they should not be 
                used in fantasy that week. For a second- or third-tier player, 
                drop your expectations for them at least one grade that week (i.e. 
                from WR2 to WR3). For elite players, expect them to perform one 
                level lower than their usual status (i.e. RB1 performs like a 
                RB2).
 Yellow – Keep expectations 
                fairly low in this matchup. For lower-level players, a yellow 
                matchup is a borderline start at best. For a second- or third-tier 
                player, they can probably overcome the matchup if things fall 
                right. For the elite players, expect slightly better than average 
                production. White – Basically, this matchup 
                is one that could go either way. In some cases, I just don’t 
                feel like I have a good feel yet for this defense. Generally speaking, 
                these matchups are winnable matchups for all levels of players. Green – It doesn’t 
                get much better than this. For non-elite players, the stage is 
                basically set for said player to exploit the matchup. For the 
                elite player, this matchup should produce special numbers..Key: FPts – Fantasy points scored
 FPts/ G – Fantasy points/game
 Value - Read *** below
 
 ***In addition to discussing value above, there is one other note 
              regarding the numbers in the “value” column: numbers 
              that are bolded reflect positive values while the italicized numbers 
              are essentially negative. (For the more statistically-inclined, 
              the former values are on the right side of the bell curve while 
              the latter values are on the left side.)
 
 
 And now the defenses…
 
 Bonus determined by the 
              following benchmarks:
 10 points for shutout or held to 2 points
 7 points if held from 3-6 points
 4 points if held from 7-12 points
 2 points if held from 13-16 points
 1 points if held from 17-20 points
 0 points if held from 21-28 points
 -1 point if give up 29-34 points
 -3 points if give up 35+ points
 
 
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Defense/Special 
                          Teams |   
                        | Rk | Team | Value | FPts/G | FPts | PA | Sks | INT | Fum | TD | Bonus | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |  
                        | 1 | Texans | 2.17 | 11.2 | 168.0 | 243 | 47 | 20 | 10 | 30 | 31 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 2 | Seahawks | 1.37 | 10.1 | 151.0 | 252 | 38 | 17 | 11 | 30 | 27 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 3 | 49ers | 1.32 | 10.0 | 150.0 | 253 | 43 | 17 | 11 | 24 | 27 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 4 | Bears | 1.23 | 9.9 | 148.0 | 307 | 45 | 16 | 16 | 30 | 9 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 5 | Browns | 0.85 | 9.3 | 140.0 | 351 | 41 | 16 | 13 | 36 | 5 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 6 | Bengals | 0.85 | 9.3 | 140.0 | 339 | 50 | 12 | 15 | 30 | 6 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 7 | Broncos | 0.38 | 8.7 | 130.0 | 284 | 42 | 15 | 8 | 24 | 18 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 8 | Cowboys | 0.33 | 8.6 | 129.0 | 355 | 37 | 17 | 14 | 24 | 6 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 9 | Patriots | 0.24 | 8.5 | 127.0 | 303 | 35 | 15 | 13 | 24 | 12 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 10 | Ravens | 0.05 | 8.2 | 123.0 | 308 | 41 | 13 | 13 | 18 | 12 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 11 | Cardinals | 0.00 | 8.1 | 122.0 | 359 | 35 | 17 | 11 | 30 | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 12 | Redskins | 0.00 | 8.1 | 122.0 | 345 | 40 | 15 | 9 | 30 | 4 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 13 | Vikings | 0.09 | 8.0 | 120.0 | 326 | 42 | 14 | 13 | 12 | 12 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 14 | Packers | 0.19 | 7.9 | 118.0 | 364 | 39 | 18 | 9 | 24 | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 15 | Rams | 0.19 | 7.9 | 118.0 | 352 | 47 | 16 | 8 | 18 | 5 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 16 | Chiefs | 0.28 | 7.7 | 116.0 | 313 | 34 | 16 | 8 | 24 | 10 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 17 | Dolphins | 0.28 | 7.7 | 116.0 | 322 | 40 | 16 | 8 | 18 | 10 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 18 | Bucs | 0.33 | 7.7 | 115.0 | 269 | 30 | 17 | 7 | 18 | 19 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 19 | Lions | 0.42 | 7.5 | 113.0 | 360 | 39 | 14 | 9 | 24 | 4 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 20 | Bills | 0.71 | 7.1 | 107.0 | 367 | 36 | 15 | 10 | 18 | 3 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 21 | Falcons | 0.85 | 6.9 | 104.0 | 385 | 28 | 17 | 10 | 24 | -2 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 22 | Giants | 0.90 | 6.9 | 103.0 | 366 | 35 | 14 | 13 | 12 | 2 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 23 | Steelers | 1.13 | 6.5 | 98.0 | 291 | 36 | 10 | 9 | 12 | 12 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 24 | Saints | 1.18 | 6.5 | 97.0 | 419 | 32 | 18 | 9 | 18 | -7 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 25 | Panthers | 1.70 | 5.7 | 86.0 | 381 | 37 | 8 | 10 | 18 | -5 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 26 | Jets | 1.74 | 5.7 | 85.0 | 397 | 30 | 10 | 12 | 12 | -1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 27 | Colts | 1.79 | 5.6 | 84.0 | 374 | 27 | 11 | 5 | 24 | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 28 | Chargers | 2.17 | 5.1 | 76.0 | 420 | 28 | 12 | 10 | 12 | -8 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 29 | Titans | 2.59 | 4.5 | 67.0 | 419 | 29 | 8 | 6 | 18 | -8 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 30 | Jaguars | 2.88 | 4.1 | 61.0 | 450 | 23 | 9 | 9 | 12 | -10 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 31 | Eagles | 2.92 | 4.0 | 60.0 | 439 | 26 | 11 | 7 | 12 | -14 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
                        | 32 | Raiders | 2.97 | 3.9 | 59.0 | 471 | 27 | 9 | 7 | 18 | -18 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 Instead of waiting until the end of the preseason to search for 
                the next Victor Cruz (like 
                I did here last season), I’m going to provide a list 
                of under-the-radar players who impressed me in the previous week 
                of preseason action). Since I don’t make it a habit to watch 
                all 16 exhibition games in the final week of the preseason, I 
                will start with Week 1’s “standouts” this week 
                and continue on over the next two weeks. The main difference between 
                what I did last year and what I will do this year, however, is 
                simply identify players who I believe made their case to move 
                up the depth chart. And this isn’t so much about who performed 
                well in the box score, but more about skill-position players who 
                did their job well. If nothing else, don’t hesitate to queue 
                these players on your dynasty watch list (in no particular order): Week 1: Armanti Edwards, WR Carolina; 
                Brice Butler, WR Oakland; Jaron Brown, WR Arizona; C.J. Anderson, 
                RB Denver (out 4-6 weeks); Rex Burkhead, RB Cincinnati; Jermaine 
                Kearse, WR Seattle; Travaris Cadet, RB New Orleans, Ace Sanders, 
                WR Jacksonville; Marquess Wilson, WR Chicago; Michael Cox, RB 
                NY Giants
 Next: PPR 
                Big Board   
 Suggestions, comments, about the article or 
                fantasy football in general? E-mail 
                me or follow me on Twitter. 
                
 Doug Orth has written for FF Today 
              since 2006 and appeared in USA Today’s Fantasy Football Preview 
              magazine in 2010 and 2011. He hosted USA Today’s hour-long, 
              pre-kickoff fantasy football internet chat every Sunday this past 
              season. Doug regularly appears as a fantasy football analyst on 
              Sirius XM’s “Fantasy Drive” and for 106.7 The 
              Fan (WJFK – Washington, D.C). He is also a member of the Fantasy 
              Sports Writers Association.
 |