Fantasy Football Today - fantasy football rankings, cheatsheets, and information
A Fantasy Football Community!




Create An Account  |  Advertise  |  Contact      





Doug Orth | Archive | Email |
Staff Writer


Projections - AFC & NFC East
Preseason Matchup Analysis
7/16/13

East | North | South | West

A d v e r t i s e m e n t

In case you hadn’t noticed, fantasy football is a bit like my full-time job away from my full-time job. And there is nothing wrong with that; there’s a big difference between working hard at something you love to do and simply working hard just to earn a paycheck.

As fantasy football continues to grow year after year, so does the sophistication of the average football fan. When I first started Preseason Matchup Analysis for public consumption back in 2008, it was a noble concept that needed more information than I had available to me at the time. As more and more sites have found their way into the public consciousness and established certain metrics that help break down the game, my knowledge of the game and ability to deliver a finer product has also increased. In the beginning, it was enough to consider a team like Baltimore or Pittsburgh to be bad news for every fantasy player they faced. Now, my PMAs consider factors such as the likelihood of how often a certain receiver will play in the slot against how often he may square off against the defense’s best corner – and how he matches up against him physically. While it is a long process, it is a worthwhile exercise.

It is this kind of painstaking detail that I believe sets “Preseason Matchup Analysis” apart from any other projection method in the business. While last year’s ranks and numbers are considered when predicting game-by-game totals, consistently successful prognosticators and fantasy owners typically “see the future” better than their counterparts. No method is foolproof or all-encompassing; for every Doug Martin, Arian Foster or Eric Decker breakout I get right, there will always the players like Cecil Shorts that go from third- or fourth-string on their team’s depth chart to fantasy stardom.

Also, every set of projections has some bias attached to them; the trick is running the bias through enough filters in order to minimize the impact of it, which I believe this method does. One of the main tenets of my method is based on the notion that elite players will be elite about 75% of the time or more regardless of the matchup. But elite fantasy players are simply the foundation of your team. In order to consistently make the playoffs and succeed in the fantasy postseason, “little things” such as potential matchups play a vital role in determining which good players will perform at an elite level in that week. This method is all about increasing your likelihood of success during the playoffs – a time where there is usually very little separating each of the remaining teams.

Quite often, the best businesses (and their practices) in the real world are the ones that are the most transparent and adaptable to change. It’s hard to be more transparent than I am each year with my projections. As for the ability to change, one preseason injury to a key offensive player can cause a ripple effect to the entire team’s projections while an injury to a key defensive player can do the same to each of their opponents. While it sounds like a lot of work – and it is – it is necessary because those “ripple effects” are felt on the field as well. (Art imitating reality…what a wonderful concept!)

Here’s a quick explanation of what each of the colors mean in each team’s projection chart below:

Red – A very difficult matchup. For lower-level players, a red matchup means they should not be used in fantasy that week. For a second- or third-tier player, drop your expectations for them at least one grade that week (i.e. from WR2 to WR3). For elite players, expect them to perform one level lower than their usual status (i.e. RB1 performs like a RB2).

Yellow – Keep expectations fairly low in this matchup. For lower-level players, a yellow matchup is a borderline start at best. For a second- or third-tier player, they can probably overcome the matchup if things fall right. For the elite players, expect slightly better than average production.

White – Basically, this matchup is one that could go either way. In some cases, I just don’t feel like I have a good feel yet for this defense. Generally speaking, these matchups are winnable matchups for all levels of players.

Green – It doesn’t get much better than this. For non-elite players, the stage is basically set for said player to exploit the matchup. For the elite player, this matchup should produce special numbers.

For an example as to the amount of possibilities and factors I consider, take a look below at New England’s projections. Danny Amendola does not have a single “red” on his schedule because most defenses that have clear No. 1 CBs usually have them play certain sides of the field and do not use them as “shadows”. And for the teams that use “shadows”, almost none of them use that player to guard a slot receiver, which is where Amendola will spend a great deal of his time. And really, that is just the tip of the iceberg when I hammer out these projections. As you can tell, a lot of thought goes into this.

Here are some final notes to help you understand what you see below in the tables:

Notes:

  1. The gray highlight in each team’s schedule reflects a road game and the numbers above them correspond to the weeks of the season.

  2. These are my initial projections and therefore subject to change. In a few cases, the changes will be dramatic. Changes may come in the form of a different-colored matchup and/or a player’s “game log”. In some cases, a strong preseason may warrant the inclusion of one name in a team projection and the removal of another.

  3. For all those readers whose eyes gravitate immediately to the player’s final numbers: they are 15-game totals because most fantasy seasons have a Week 16 title game. Additionally, players with fewer than 10 projected catches or 100 projected yards have been removed, which will explain the discrepancy in some of the quarterback’s final numbers.

  4. The age you see by each player will be that player’s age as of September 1, 2013.

Key to the table below:

PPR Aver - Points per game in full-point PPR leagues where all touchdowns are worth six points.
NPPR Aver - Points per game in non-PPR leagues where all touchdowns are worth six points.
PPR - Total points scored in PPR
Non-PPR - Total points scored in non-PPR.


AFC East

 Buffalo Bills
Pos Player Age PPR Aver NPPR Aver PPR Non Totals 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
NE CAR NYJ BAL CLE CIN MIA NO KC PIT NYJ bye ATL TB JAC MIA
QB Kevin Kolb 29 16.5 16.5 132.1 132.1 1740 240 185 160 INJ INJ 285 275 340 190 65 BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN
TD 12 2 1 1 INJ INJ 2 2 3 1 0 BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN
INT 10 1 0 1 INJ INJ 2 0 3 2 1 BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN
Ru Yards 45 5 10 0 INJ INJ 5 0 10 10 5 BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN
Ru TD 1 0 0 0 INJ INJ 0 0 0 1 0 BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN
QB EJ Manuel 23 15.4 15.4 138.3 138.3 1770 110 185 205 85 220 265 215 275 210
TD 8 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 2 0
INT 10 0 2 1 0 2 2 1 0 2
Ru Yards 215 35 25 25 10 25 40 15 25 15
Ru TD 3 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
RB C.J. Spiller 26 19.5 15.5 293 233 1205 85 130 55 70 125 70 30 65 105 65 105 55 50 120 75
Ru TD 8 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1
Re Yards 525 50 25 60 20 15 75 0 60 40 20 20 65 25 15 35
Re TD 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Rec 60 5 3 6 4 2 5 0 5 5 4 3 7 4 3 4
RB Fred Jackson 32 9.3 7.9 121.5 102.5 520 45 35 30 25 40 40 65 35 INJ INJ 45 30 40 65 25
Ru TD 6 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 INJ INJ 1 0 1 1 0
Re Yards 145 5 0 15 10 0 15 25 20 INJ INJ 0 10 0 25 20
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 19 1 0 1 2 0 2 4 2 INJ INJ 0 2 0 3 2
WR Steve Johnson 27 15.2 10 228 150 1080 65 55 80 40 50 85 105 90 70 40 135 85 55 85 40
Re TD 7 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0
Rec 78 5 4 6 3 4 6 7 6 5 3 10 5 4 6 4
WR Robert Woods 21 8.1 4.9 121 74 560 35 20 45 50 45 30 25 45 35 45 15 40 65 25 40
Re TD 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Rec 47 3 2 4 5 4 3 2 5 3 3 1 4 3 2 3
WR Da’Rick Rogers 22 6 3.8 77.5 49.5 375 15 0 20 25 60 INJ 70 45 25 INJ 40 20 0 35 20
Re TD 2 0 0 0 0 0 INJ 1 0 0 INJ 1 0 0 0 0
Rec 28 1 0 2 2 3 INJ 4 4 2 INJ 4 2 0 2 2
WR T.J. Graham 24 3.3 2.3 50 34 280 35 60 10 0 15 10 25 25 0 20 0 0 25 55 0
Re TD 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 16 2 3 1 0 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 3 0
WR Marquise Goodwin 22 1.6 1.2 24.5 17.5 115 0 0 0 15 0 0 10 55 0 0 0 10 15 0 10
Re TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 7 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1
TE Scott Chandler 28 4.2 2.9 63.5 43.5 195 15 10 0 10 20 30 15 0 20 15 10 15 0 25 10
Re TD 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Rec 20 2 1 0 1 2 3 1 0 2 2 1 1 0 3 1
TE Chris Gragg 23 4.5 2.6 49.5 28.5 225 20 15 40 15 0 40 0 INJ INJ INJ INJ 20 30 10 35
Re TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 INJ INJ INJ INJ 0 0 0 0
Rec 21 2 1 3 2 0 4 0 INJ INJ INJ INJ 2 3 1 3

General overview: Buffalo added a lot of young talent on the offensive side of the ball, particularly at receiver. Woods should be a steady 6-to-10 year pro while Rogers could easily become the top receiver on the team in a few years assuming he can stay out of trouble off the field. The Bills hope they found their future at quarterback with the multi-dimensional Manuel, but they will almost certainly be in trouble if he becomes their present at any point this season. However, their strength – and the focus of new HC Doug Marrone – will be on the running game and Spiller in particular. Jackson will not be forgotten, but all indications are that Spiller will finally get the chance to do what former HC Chan Gailey drafted him to do (but failed to follow through): be a Jamaal Charles clone and put the offense on his back.

Matchup analysis: While there is no extended stretch of weak defenses, Buffalo will start off the season with two home games, including one against a New England team that could take a while to find itself and a Panthers’ defense that will likely feature two rookies among their top three defensive tackles and a defensive backfield that is a huge question mark beyond top CB Josh Norman. The Bills will play four of six on the road after hosting Carolina in Week 2, making that stretch a critical one for an offense that wants to go up-tempo and run the ball. During that six-week period, it will be difficult for anyone outside of Spiller and Johnson to maintain any level of consistency. Spiller’s all-purpose game will make him a weekly 100 total-yard, one-score threat regardless of the opponent while Marrone’s willingness to use Johnson in the slot on a more regular basis – to avoid most teams’ top corners and double teams – should allow him to take his fantasy game to another level for as long as Kolb is the starter. By using his team’s two most dynamic weapons in the manner in which it appears he will use them, Marrone is setting up the rest of his team for success despite a difficult schedule. The true wild-card will be if Graham or Rogers can step up and be a legitimate threat in addition to Woods, something only time will tell us.

Miami Dolphins
Pos Player Age PPR Aver NPPR Aver PPR Non Totals 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
CLE IND ATL NO BAL bye BUF NE CIN TB SD CAR NYJ PIT NE BUF
QB Ryan Tannehill 25 19.4 19.4 290.6 290.6 3940 230 315 285 265 185 265 275 300 255 305 290 260 215 225 270
TD 22 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 0 4 1 1 2 1 1
INT 14 0 2 1 1 0 0 2 0 3 1 0 1 0 1 2
Ru Yards 170 10 5 0 20 15 25 5 15 10 0 15 10 5 20 15
Ru TD 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
RB Lamar Miller 22 15.2 12.5 228 187 1125 65 75 85 110 45 50 70 75 30 110 120 65 40 75 110
Ru TD 6 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Re Yards 325 15 35 20 15 15 35 25 20 55 20 15 10 10 20 15
Re TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 41 2 4 2 2 2 5 3 3 4 2 3 1 2 3 3
RB Daniel Thomas 25 4.3 3.8 51 46 190 15 15 10 INJ 15 0 15 10 5 35 INJ INJ 15 20 35
Ru TD 4 1 0 0 INJ 0 0 0 0 0 1 INJ INJ 0 1 1
Re Yards 30 0 0 5 INJ 0 0 5 0 0 10 INJ INJ 0 5 5
Re TD 0 0 0 0 INJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ 0 0 0
Rec 5 0 0 1 INJ 0 0 1 0 0 1 INJ INJ 0 1 1
RB Mike Gillislee 22 3.5 2.5 48.5 35.5 190 0 10 15 15 30 20 10 20 10 0 25 25 INJ 10 0
Ru TD 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ 0 0
Re Yards 105 5 10 0 5 10 10 0 5 10 10 0 15 INJ 10 15
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ 0 0
Rec 13 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 2 INJ 1 2
WR Mike Wallace 27 15.3 10.8 229.5 161.5 1135 35 110 90 120 50 35 80 110 40 125 115 40 75 50 60
Re TD 8 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0
Rec 68 3 7 5 6 3 2 6 7 3 6 6 3 5 3 3
WR Brian Hartline 26 10.5 6.8 157.5 102.5 785 60 45 70 75 35 60 50 35 55 40 45 70 35 45 65
Re TD 4 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Rec 55 5 4 5 4 2 5 3 3 4 3 4 4 2 3 4
WR Brandon Gibson 26 3.4 2.1 51 31 250 15 0 25 10 0 40 0 30 15 0 55 20 25 15 0
Re TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Rec 20 1 0 2 1 0 3 0 3 1 0 4 2 2 1 0
WR Armon Binns 23 2.3 1.2 34 18 180 20 10 15 0 10 15 25 30 10 15 0 10 0 10 10
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 16 2 1 1 0 1 2 2 2 1 1 0 1 0 1 1
WR Rishard Matthews 23 2.7 1.9 41 28 220 25 40 0 15 0 15 20 0 0 35 10 0 20 0 40
Re TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 13 2 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 2
TE Dustin Keller 28 11.5 7.4 172.5 110.5 745 45 65 35 25 50 45 55 70 35 50 50 80 25 70 45
Re TD 6 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0
Rec 62 4 6 3 2 5 3 4 6 3 5 4 6 2 6 3
TE Charles Clay 24 2.6 1.5 39.5 22.5 165 10 0 25 0 15 10 15 0 35 0 0 15 25 0 15
Re TD 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 17 1 0 2 0 2 1 2 0 3 0 0 2 2 0 2

General overview: GM Jeff Ireland is going for broke in a way only redraft fantasy owners could love. Wallace may not have been the greatest “scheme fit” per se, but he was the best receiver on the market and landed on a team desperate for his big-play ability. Keller adds a presence at tight end the team hasn’t seen since the days of a young (and productive) Randy McMichael. The Dolphins have thrown their belief behind new LT Jonathan Martin –who will take over for Jake Long – but smartly nabbed one of the better free-agent options to replace Martin at right tackle in Tyson Clabo. The team has been singing the praises all offseason of Miller, who should be the lead back – if not the feature back – assuming he shows the kind of pass-protection chops he has displayed in mini-camp and OTAs. Tannehill surpassed expectations in a big way as a rookie considering Hartline was his top option. A common NFL axiom says players improve the most between their first and second season, which puts Tannehill in prime position to be a top 12-15 fantasy quarterback with all of his new weapons.

Matchup analysis: Assuming new Browns DC Ray Horton will use CB Joe Haden as a “shadow”, Wallace could have a difficult Week 1, but he has a great shot of going into the bye with at least three high-quality starts. His post-bye slate is a different story as he’ll likely see plenty of the Bills’ Stephon Gilmore (twice), a potentially healthy Darrelle Revis and Antonio Cromartie – just to name a few. The way their matchups line up this season, it is possible most of Keller’s good games will come during Wallace’s “off” games. The pre-bye schedule is loaded with solid cover safeties, but the post-bye part is not, meaning it will be important for the offensive braintrust to be creative with their formations early on in order to get Keller matched up with a linebacker as often as possible. Hartline will obviously not see another 74-catch season anytime soon, but there aren’t many opponents on the schedule with the personnel to match up comfortably with him now that he is the No. 2 receiver. In other words, Hartline – and the entire passing game for that matter – should be much more consistent in 2013. Somewhat like Spiller, Miller’s versatility should keep his value afloat despite a challenging list of tough run defenses from the AFC North, Tampa Bay and the improved units in Miami’s own division (Jets and Bills). Unlike last season, Tannehill has enough firepower to compete against any defense, so it will be critical that he can make the transition from being a signal-caller reliant on Hartline in 2012 to a spread-the-wealth quarterback in 2013. He’s more than capable of doing just that.

New England Patriots
Pos Player Age PPR Aver NPPR Aver PPR Non Totals 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
BUF NYJ TB ATL CIN NO NYJ MIA PIT bye CAR DEN HOU CLE MIA BAL
QB Tom Brady 36 20.3 20.3 304.8 304.8 4070 240 290 255 345 255 310 245 185 220 270 265 315 330 285 260
TD 23 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 0 1 2 1 1 3 3 1
INT 8 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 1
Ru Yards 20 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 0
Ru TD 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
RB Stevan Ridley 24 12.1 11.7 181 175 1100 85 100 55 90 70 120 90 35 60 110 60 70 90 45 20
Ru TD 10 1 1 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
Re Yards 50 0 5 10 0 0 0 0 0 5 10 0 5 0 10 5
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 6 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1
RB Shane Vereen 24 14.8 10.4 177.5 124.5 405 40 25 25 35 20 20 INJ INJ INJ 20 30 25 65 70 30
Ru TD 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ INJ 0 1 0 1 0 0
Re Yards 480 55 25 70 50 35 50 INJ INJ INJ 15 65 25 40 35 15
Re TD 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 INJ INJ INJ 0 1 0 0 1 0
Rec 53 5 3 7 5 4 6 INJ INJ INJ 3 5 4 3 5 3
RB Brandon Bolden 23 4.5 4.2 67.5 63.5 430 15 20 5 15 20 45 30 70 35 85 15 10 0 15 50
Ru TD 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Re Yards 25 0 0 0 5 10 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 4 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
WR Danny Amendola 27 17.1 9.9 205.5 118.5 945 75 105 80 105 INJ INJ INJ 60 75 85 55 75 105 85 40
Re TD 4 0 0 1 0 INJ INJ INJ 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0
Rec 87 8 10 7 9 INJ INJ INJ 6 8 8 5 6 8 8 4
WR Julian Edelman 27 9.2 5.3 101.5 58.5 465 40 50 25 30 75 85 40 INJ INJ INJ INJ 45 25 15 35
Re TD 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 INJ INJ INJ INJ 0 0 0 1
Rec 43 4 5 2 3 7 8 4 INJ INJ INJ INJ 4 2 1 3
WR Aaron Dobson 22 7.5 4.9 112 74 560 35 45 55 65 50 35 30 0 30 60 20 35 25 45 30
Re TD 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Rec 38 2 2 3 4 3 2 3 0 3 4 2 3 2 3 2
WR Donald Jones 25 5.6 3.1 84 47 410 25 20 0 30 30 25 55 40 20 35 15 20 45 15 35
Re TD 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 37 2 2 0 3 3 2 5 4 2 3 1 2 4 1 3
WR Josh Boyce 23 2.7 2 40.5 30.5 245 0 20 0 35 0 45 0 0 10 0 45 50 0 0 40
Re TD 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 10 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 2
TE Rob Gronkowski 24 15.5 10.1 170 111 690 INJ INJ INJ INJ 45 70 85 65 60 50 60 50 70 80 55
Re TD 7 INJ INJ INJ INJ 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 0
Rec 59 INJ INJ INJ INJ 4 6 8 5 5 5 6 4 6 6 4
TE Zach Sudfield 24 2.5 1.5 38 22 160 10 20 15 25 10 0 20 15 0 15 0 10 20 0 0
Re TD 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 16 1 2 1 2 1 0 2 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 0

General overview: The Patriots are annually one of the more difficult teams to project each season, but this year will be more difficult than most with so many questions and so few answers. Aaron Hernandez is in jail, Wes Welker and Danny Woodhead are gone while Gronkowski’s injury status is uncertain. Most of the replacements (potential replacement in Gronk’s case) are young and none of them are as decorated or as good as the departed/injured players. The common belief is that New England will lean more heavily on the running game and use Vereen as its new “matchup nightmare”, but don’t discount the possibility of the Patriots only slightly dialing down their slot-heavy passing offense, using Amendola and Edelman to fill the void inside the hashmarks left behind by Welker and Hernandez.

Matchup analysis: Because Amendola will be doing most of his damage from the slot, his fantasy owners don’t have a lot to worry about for most of the season until the second half of the season when he could square off against top-10 slot CBs – per Pro Football Focus – Chris Harris (Denver) and Brice McCain (Houston) as well as renowned Ravens slot CB Lardarius Webb. The road will not be nearly as smooth for whichever receiver wins Brandon Lloyd’s old job – be it Edelman, Dobson, Jones or even Michael Jenkins. It is another reason why Vereen should be on fantasy owners’ radar as a high-upside RB3 in PPR leagues since he will more than likely assume all of Woodhead’s 116 offensive touches from a season ago and then some, regardless of whether or not Gronkowski misses significant regular-season action. New England has actually possessed one of the better run-blocking offensive lines in recent years and is young enough up front to keep it going for a while longer, so whatever the Patriots’ running backs lost in terms of the space created by the passing game, they should make up for in 2013 with volume. New England faces some potentially difficult matchups against the run in Tampa Bay, Pittsburgh, Houston and Baltimore – to name a few – but should rank among the top rushing teams in the league again in 2013.

New York Jets
Pos Player Age PPR Aver NPPR Aver PPR Non Totals 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
TB NE BUF TEN ATL PIT NE CIN NO bye BUF BAL MIA OAK CAR CLE
QB Mark Sanchez 26 9.7 9.7 87 87 1600 135 135 220 245 155 170 235 200 105 BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN
TD 6 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN
INT 11 2 1 1 0 3 1 0 2 1 BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN
Ru Yards 30 5 0 0 5 5 0 0 10 5 BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN
Ru TD 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN BEN
QB Geno Smith 22 10 10 100.2 100.2 1455 55 30 35 155 260 175 215 155 235 140
TD 8 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 2 1
INT 10 1 0 0 1 2 1 2 0 1 2
Ru Yards 80 5 0 5 15 10 10 15 0 10 10
Ru TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
RB Chris Ivory 25 11.2 10.4 146 135 830 35 55 65 INJ 55 45 35 80 110 55 40 INJ 120 75 60
Ru TD 7 0 0 1 INJ 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 INJ 2 1 0
Re Yards 100 15 0 0 INJ 0 10 5 0 15 20 10 INJ 10 15 0
Re TD 0 0 0 0 INJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ 0 0 0
Rec 11 2 0 0 INJ 0 2 1 0 1 2 1 INJ 1 1 0
RB Bilal Powell 24 4.4 3.5 61 49 280 15 20 15 75 15 25 5 0 35 10 20 25 10 INJ 10
Ru TD 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 INJ 0
Re Yards 90 0 10 10 20 15 15 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 INJ 0
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ 0
Rec 12 0 1 2 3 2 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 INJ 0
RB Mike Goodson 26 10.5 7.8 125.5 93.5 385 25 30 35 INJ INJ INJ 50 25 10 40 25 55 35 35 20
Ru TD 2 0 0 0 INJ INJ INJ 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Re Yards 310 35 20 15 INJ INJ INJ 25 30 55 20 15 25 15 40 15
Re TD 2 0 0 0 INJ INJ INJ 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
Rec 32 3 2 3 INJ INJ INJ 2 4 3 2 2 4 2 3 2
WR Santonio Holmes 29 8.3 5.1 49.5 30.5 245 PUP PUP PUP PUP PUP PUP PUP PUP PUP 25 40 35 55 70 20
Re TD 1 PUP PUP PUP PUP PUP PUP PUP PUP PUP 0 0 0 0 1 0
Rec 19 PUP PUP PUP PUP PUP PUP PUP PUP PUP 2 3 2 5 5 2
WR Stephen Hill 22 8.8 5.9 106 71 530 0 20 40 55 80 35 40 55 35 65 45 60 INJ INJ INJ
Re TD 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 INJ INJ INJ
Rec 35 0 2 3 4 5 2 3 2 3 5 3 3 INJ INJ INJ
WR Jeremy Kerley 24 9.3 5.7 140 85 670 40 65 45 70 40 25 30 55 75 45 10 55 30 20 65
Re TD 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Rec 55 3 5 4 5 3 2 2 4 6 4 1 5 3 2 6
WR Ben Obomanu 29 5 2.9 75 44 380 35 25 50 30 10 30 50 20 25 20 0 20 0 45 20
Re TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 31 3 2 3 3 1 2 4 2 2 2 0 2 0 3 2
TE Jeff Cumberland 26 5.1 3 77 45 330 30 25 35 40 20 15 40 30 0 20 25 0 20 20 10
Re TD 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Rec 32 3 2 4 2 2 2 4 3 0 2 3 0 2 2 1
TE Hayden Smith 28 3.7 2.4 55 36 240 10 0 25 0 15 40 20 0 15 45 20 15 25 0 10
Re TD 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 19 1 0 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 3 2 1 2 0 1

General overview: Like just about every other team in this division, there is a great deal of uncertainty on offense. However, no team is in worse shape than the Jets, who will enter training camp with a quarterback “competition” and very little proven (or healthy) talent at receiver. New York dropped OC Tony Sparano in the offseason and replaced him with West Coast offense aficionado Marty Mornhinweg, but the play-calling upgrade will mean very little unless Sanchez or Smith can pull a rabbit out of their hat. (In fact, Mornhinweg should be declared an offensive mastermind and in line for another head-coaching job in 2014 if he is able to make this passing game respectable.) As of mid-June, Holmes was still unable to run or cut on his surgically-repaired foot following his grade-four Lisfranc fracture – the most serious kind. Hill (knee) is also recovering from a surgery, but showed very little after Week 1 and isn’t a great fit for the new offense. The only intriguing fantasy option might be Ivory, but even that optimism should be tempered due to his violent running style and the likelihood he will miss some games because of it. Goodson could be an excellent complement and a top fantasy handcuff, but he will likely be facing some kind of punishment from the league and/or legal system at some point this season and isn’t the most durable player to boot.

Matchup analysis: Due to the personnel shortcomings of ex-GM Mike Tannenbaum, the Jets have a number of offensive position “battles” and very little in terms of clarity. About the only thing that seems certain is that Ivory will carry the load for as long as he can; although between high-scoring offenses that could make the Jets abandon the running game early and tough rushing defenses, Ivory will have his work cut out for him throughout most of his schedule. The ex-Saint could be a fantasy playoff stud assuming the Raiders and Panthers don’t make an incredible leap in their ability to stop the run, however. Sanchez will probably begin the season as the starter despite playing about as poorly as he could have last season, but is almost certain to lose his job at some point to Smith. The rookie should be an upgrade, but expecting him to provide some kind of spark with the Jets’ mediocre talent at receiver and their difficult schedule is asking a lot. (In the interest of full disclosure, my expectation is that Holmes will begin the regular season on the Physically Unable to Perform list, which is why his highlights match Hill’s over that time.) It is rare to write off an entire half of one team’s offense before the season starts, but there is no guarantee Holmes will return to the field healthy or that Hill will take a huge stride forward, leaving Kerley as the receiver most likely to carry the most fantasy value.

NFC East

Dallas Cowboys
Pos Player Age PPR Aver NPPR Aver PPR Non Totals 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
NYG KC STL SD DEN WAS PHI DET MIN NO bye NYG OAK CHI GB WAS
QB Tony Romo 33 22.3 22.3 334.4 334.4 4360 315 245 230 285 310 315 275 290 235 335 335 290 260 350 290
TD 29 2 1 1 3 1 2 4 2 1 3 0 4 1 2 2
INT 12 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 2
Ru Yards 40 0 5 5 0 5 5 0 0 5 0 10 0 0 5 0
Ru TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
RB DeMarco Murray 25 16.9 13.9 202.5 166.5 950 75 85 115 80 50 35 110 45 INJ INJ INJ 150 85 45 75
Ru TD 6 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 INJ INJ INJ 1 0 0 1
Re Yards 295 35 15 25 10 45 10 10 25 INJ INJ INJ 15 25 55 25
Re TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ INJ 0 1 0 0
Rec 36 4 2 3 1 6 1 2 3 INJ INJ INJ 1 4 7 2
RB Joseph Randle 21 7.4 5.9 111.5 88.5 485 20 25 15 10 35 25 15 70 45 85 45 15 20 45 15
Ru TD 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Re Yards 160 15 10 0 25 0 0 5 25 20 20 15 5 0 15 5
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 23 2 1 0 3 0 0 1 2 3 4 3 1 0 2 1
WR Dez Bryant 24 19.9 13.9 298.5 208.5 1365 85 60 65 115 45 110 125 105 55 120 110 90 85 95 100
Re TD 12 1 0 0 2 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1
Rec 90 6 4 4 8 3 7 9 6 4 7 7 6 7 6 6
WR Miles Austin 29 11.9 7.7 167 108 780 45 45 55 75 35 50 80 INJ 85 55 45 80 45 35 50
Re TD 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 INJ 1 0 0 1 0 0 1
Rec 59 4 5 4 6 3 3 4 INJ 6 4 3 6 5 2 4
WR Dwayne Harris 25 3.5 2.1 42.5 25.5 195 25 20 10 0 15 20 0 INJ INJ INJ 15 0 35 25 30
Re TD 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ INJ 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 17 2 2 1 0 1 2 0 INJ INJ INJ 1 0 3 2 3
WR Terrance Williams 23 6 4.4 90 66 420 30 35 25 0 25 50 0 50 0 55 45 55 10 40 0
Re TD 4 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Rec 24 2 1 1 0 2 3 0 4 0 2 3 3 1 2 0
TE Jason Witten 31 14 8.1 210 121 970 70 55 40 60 120 65 50 75 60 70 85 30 60 75 55
Re TD 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Rec 89 7 5 4 5 12 6 4 10 4 7 6 2 6 6 5
TE Gavin Escobar 22 2.6 1.7 39.5 25.5 135 10 0 10 0 15 0 5 10 0 15 20 15 0 10 25
Re TD 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 14 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 2 1 0 1 2

General overview: From a personnel perspective, very little has changed in Dallas. Outside of adding a fifth-round rookie in Randle the team hopes can “mirror” Murray, the only other notable change among the skill positions is at receiver – where either Harris or Williams is expected to win the job behind Bryant and Austin. However, the Cowboys did not maintain the status quo as owner Jerry Jones stripped the play-calling duties from Jason Garrett and gave them to Bill Callahan, who is expected to place more of the offensive responsibility on the running game. It’s a noble goal, but Murray will have to stay healthy for the first time in his NFL career in order for the Cowboys to stick with it since Randle lacks the third-year back’s game-breaking talent. The addition of first-round G-C Travis Frederick should help immensely, but it will be important for the team to stay healthy up front this season in order to execute Callahan’s vision. Witten is a proven chain-mover and Bryant took a huge step forward in 2012 to become the team’s go-to receiver, so Callahan’s plan to bring more balance to the offense will probably only last as long as Murray can remain off the injury report.

Matchup analysis: In addition to matching up with at least two rebuilding teams in the AFC West, a game against New Orleans and a division full of teams with average-at-best cornerbacks – outside of its own – Dallas has enough plus-matchups to do some damage in the passing game if it chooses to go that route at some point. Kansas City, St. Louis and Denver will each challenge Bryant and Austin over the first five weeks, but beyond that, it could be argued that Minnesota and Chicago are the only teams that should make their owners pause over the remainder of the fantasy season. In PPR leagues, Witten is virtually matchup-proof in part because Romo leans on him so heavily and because defenses will gladly give him his 5-8 yard receptions as opposed to watching Bryant and Austin beat them downfield. Murray is a physical back whose body has betrayed him through two NFL seasons. Although he has been “injury-plagued”, he is not “injury-prone” (in terms of dealing with a chronic injury) in the same way a back like Darren McFadden is, which makes him more unlucky than cursed. If his body holds up in 2013, Murray’s slate is advantageous to a breakout season – not only does Dallas plan on running more of its offense through him, but also because of the absence of potentially elite run defenses. Murray’s abilities as a receiver will keep him viable in fantasy during any shootout or blowout, so the only question will be if he can break the 200-carry mark for the first time in his NFL career.

New York Giants
Pos Player Age PPR Aver NPPR Aver PPR Non Totals 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
DAL DEN CAR KC PHI CHI MIN PHI bye OAK GB DAL WAS SD SEA DET
QB Eli Manning 32 20.5 20.5 308.1 308.1 3965 230 270 240 305 200 235 320 305 240 260 280 325 265 190 300
TD 29 1 2 3 2 1 1 3 2 1 2 3 3 2 1 2
INT 14 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 2 1 2 0
Ru Yards 35 5 0 5 5 0 5 0 0 0 10 0 5 0 0 0
Ru TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RB David Wilson 22 13.8 12.3 193.5 171.5 1030 80 50 90 85 110 75 45 75 125 35 INJ 60 85 45 70
Ru TD 7 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 INJ 0 0 0 1
Re Yards 205 10 0 15 15 0 20 50 10 15 0 INJ 30 15 5 20
Re TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 INJ 0 0 0 0
Rec 22 1 0 2 3 0 2 3 1 1 0 INJ 4 2 1 2
RB Andre Brown 26 12 10.7 168 150 620 50 30 25 45 20 45 55 35 45 70 90 INJ 25 35 50
Ru TD 13 1 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 1 INJ 1 0 1
Re Yards 100 15 5 0 5 0 5 10 15 0 10 15 INJ 10 10 0
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ 0 0 0
Rec 18 2 1 0 1 0 1 2 3 0 2 3 INJ 1 2 0
WR Hakeem Nicks 25 15.7 10.5 203.5 136.5 945 50 80 105 60 80 INJ 30 INJ 55 105 65 125 105 40 45
Re TD 7 0 1 1 0 1 INJ 0 INJ 0 1 1 1 1 0 0
Rec 67 4 6 8 4 6 INJ 2 INJ 5 8 5 6 6 3 4
WR Victor Cruz 26 17.3 11.1 259 166 1180 70 80 80 115 65 85 125 75 45 90 50 85 70 35 110
Re TD 8 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1
Rec 93 5 7 5 8 4 7 11 6 3 7 5 8 7 2 8
WR Rueben Randle 22 9.3 6.1 139 91 610 35 35 15 55 20 35 75 90 45 20 40 20 35 40 50
Re TD 5 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Rec 48 3 2 1 4 2 3 5 6 3 2 3 2 3 4 5
WR Ramses Barden 27 1.4 0.7 20.5 10.5 105 0 0 0 10 0 25 0 20 10 0 20 0 0 5 15
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 10 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 1 1
TE Brandon Myers 27 7.5 4.5 112 68 500 40 40 25 25 35 30 30 50 30 25 45 55 20 10 40
Re TD 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0
Rec 44 3 4 2 2 3 2 2 5 3 2 4 5 2 1 4
TE Adrien Robinson 24 3.5 2.4 53 36 180 0 10 0 20 0 20 0 30 15 10 0 10 10 35 20
Re TD 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Rec 17 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 1 0 1 1 3 2

General overview: One of the more intriguing storylines in 2013 – on the field as well as in fantasy – will be how much the Giants choose to expand Wilson’s role. In terms of pure explosiveness, the second-year back is the NFC’s answer to Chris Johnson. But contrary to popular belief, he has a big hill to climb in order to receive the same number of carries that Johnson does on a yearly basis. First and foremost, the Giants have featured a committee attack for years and will almost certainly give Brown the goal-line work. Secondly, while it could be argued that Wilson’s upside is higher than Ahmad Bradshaw’s ever was, Brown is a better back than Brandon Jacobs was for most of his Giants’ career. Last but not least, Wilson isn’t a complete back…yet. At receiver, New York could be in the process of passing the torch from Nicks to Randle. That is not to suggest that Nicks won’t start and/or perform well when he is in the lineup, but if Randle can carry over his performance in the offseason to the regular season, the Giants may stick with Randle and decide to let Nicks sign a huge free-agent deal with another team next offseason. A similar transition could be taking place at tight end, where the team is likely hoping that Robinson improves to the point that he can make Myers expendable and give New York the same kind of production Martellus Bennett did early last season.

Matchup analysis: The Giants will be tested over the first month of the season with three road games and three opponents (Dallas, Denver and Kansas City) capable of making Manning & Co. work for their yards. Chicago and Minnesota round out a fairly difficult first-half schedule, but only Dallas and Seattle stick out as opponents that could stymie Nicks and/or Randle after the bye. (Cruz is excluded simply because he is nearly unguardable in the slot, so it will take a special effort to shut him down.) The running game should have an easier time of it in the first half as the Cowboys, Panthers, Chiefs and Eagles (twice) are all undersized, young up front or both. In fact, the only matchups that should concern fantasy owners at this point would be against Denver (improved defense plus the likelihood the game will turn into a shootout), Minnesota and Seattle. Owners also need to recognize that in addition to injuries and game situations, much will depend on whether we see the 2011 or 2012 version of Manning. The Giants have the talent to be an elite offense this year with top-level playmaking ability at almost every position, but a repeat of Manning’s rollercoaster 2012 campaign could sabotage it in a hurry.

Philadelphia Eagles
Pos Player Age PPR Aver NPPR Aver PPR Non Totals 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
WAS SD KC DEN NYG TB DAL NYG OAK GB WAS bye ARI DET MIN CHI
QB Nick Foles 24 16.9 16.9 237 237 3400 245 285 280 150 260 85 INJ 320 160 260 255 235 305 265 295
TD 19 1 2 2 0 2 0 INJ 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2
INT 13 0 1 0 2 1 1 INJ 0 1 1 0 2 1 1 2
Ru Yards 70 10 0 5 5 15 0 INJ 5 0 15 0 0 5 0 10
Ru TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
QB Michael Vick 33 14.4 14.4 43.3 43.3 395 100 140 155
TD 2 1 0 1
INT 2 1 1 0
Ru Yards 75 15 20 40
Ru TD 2 0 1 1
RB LeSean McCoy 25 18 14.5 270.5 217.5 1060 85 110 65 40 90 35 110 45 80 55 65 60 105 35 80
Ru TD 8 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1
Re Yards 455 25 15 35 75 15 25 15 35 25 30 35 15 35 25 50
Re TD 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Rec 53 2 3 3 6 2 4 2 3 3 4 5 2 5 3 6
RB Bryce Brown 22 10.5 9.2 157.5 137.5 860 65 35 90 30 55 55 110 35 125 25 40 85 40 35 35
Ru TD 6 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0
Re Yards 155 10 25 0 10 15 20 10 15 0 10 15 10 5 10 0
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 20 1 2 0 1 2 3 1 2 0 1 2 2 1 2 0
WR Jeremy Maclin 25 11.3 7.5 157.5 104.5 745 45 35 40 25 65 80 20 55 INJ 65 50 85 40 75 65
Re TD 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 INJ 1 1 1 0 1 0
Rec 53 3 2 2 2 5 6 2 4 INJ 5 3 6 2 6 5
WR DeSean Jackson 26 10.4 7.5 156 112 820 85 80 50 20 70 10 35 75 65 50 40 35 110 55 40
Re TD 5 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
Rec 44 4 5 3 1 5 1 2 3 4 2 1 2 6 3 2
WR Jason Avant 30 4.2 2.4 55 31 250 10 20 0 30 10 15 0 15 0 35 55 40 20 INJ INJ
Re TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 INJ INJ
Rec 24 1 2 0 3 1 2 0 1 0 3 5 4 2 INJ INJ
WR Arrelious Benn 24 6.7 4.1 80.5 49.5 375 25 45 65 20 25 30 0 30 25 INJ INJ INJ 35 20 55
Re TD 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ INJ 0 0 1
Rec 31 2 3 5 2 2 2 0 3 2 INJ INJ INJ 3 2 5
TE Brent Celek 28 3.2 2 48 30 180 0 10 0 10 20 15 30 0 0 20 25 0 10 20 20
Re TD 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Rec 18 0 1 0 1 2 2 3 0 0 2 2 0 1 2 2
TE James Casey 28 7.4 4.6 104 64 520 45 35 65 25 40 25 10 50 15 50 35 35 INJ 50 40
Re TD 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 INJ 0 0
Rec 40 3 3 5 2 3 2 1 4 1 3 2 3 INJ 4 4
TE Zach Ertz 22 4.4 2.7 57.5 35.5 295 0 20 25 35 0 5 35 45 30 INJ INJ 15 50 10 25
Re TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 INJ INJ 0 0 0 0
Rec 22 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 3 2 INJ INJ 1 4 1 2

General overview: Given their uncertainty at quarterback and the offense being installed by new HC Chip Kelly and OC Pat Shurmur, the Eagles are the NFC East’s version of the Jets – only with a lot more talent. It is my belief that like his final years at the University of Oregon, Kelly’s offense will operate at a breakneck pace. In turn, Philadelphia will find itself in a number of high-scoring games in part because it is has the personnel to execute Kelly’s offense and in part because the defense lacks the overall depth and talent to make it stand up – particularly against the pass. The Eagles should be the rare team that gives both of its top two backs enough touches to make them both weekly starting options in fantasy. Although I think Vick is the better fit for Kelly’s offense, I decided to name Foles the starter for this round of projections primarily because he figures to do a better job of taking care of the football and is a more accurate passer. Jackson and Maclin should both remain fantasy WR3 options – albeit inconsistent ones – although both should have some opportunity to supplement their numbers a bit should Kelly decided to use them on running plays out of the shotgun formation, such as fly sweeps. The biggest change, however, might come at tight end where Celek has been an anchor for several years. In Kelly’s offense, it is highly likely he will be used mostly as a blocker while Casey and Ertz attempt to make some noise down the field in the seams of the defense.

Matchup analysis: Kelly’s insistence to let the quarterback battle play out well into camp will make the projections for all of the Eagles’ players very fluid. Foles, Vick and Matt Barkley each require a different kind of offense in order to succeed, which obviously makes projecting the Eagles now an exercise in futility. What we do know is that Philadelphia will face a lot of defenses early with excellent edge pass rushers. Assuming LT Jason Peters can make it all the way back from two Achilles’ tendon tears, the Eagles will have the athleticism to handle them after their selection of Lane Johnson in the draft. The passing game figures to get tested against Denver, Tampa Bay and Dallas before the break and Minnesota and Chicago after it, making the quarterback, Maclin and Jackson poor bets in the fantasy playoffs. Kelly will likely waste little time leaving his mark on the NFL and his running game will have an opportunity to do just that early on. Washington’s run-heavy offense might limit its touches, Denver’s explosive offense could force the offense into comeback mode early on and Tampa Bay’s defense could be good enough to stop the rushing attack regardless, but the Eagles have a run-friendly schedule for the most part before the bye. As of this moment, it is my opinion that defenses will have a very hard time adjusting to Kelly’s approach and that it will be teams like Washington and Minnesota – offenses that run the ball particularly well in order to give their defenses a breather – that will do the best job of limiting the number of possessions Philadelphia can manage and the number of plays it can run.

Washington Redskins
Pos Player Age PPR Aver NPPR Aver PPR Non Totals 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
PHI GB DET OAK bye DAL CHI DEN SD MIN PHI SF NYG KC ATL DAL
QB Robert Griffin III 23 23.6 23.6 329.9 329.9 3335 265 255 305 170 250 175 195 INJ 260 200 215 285 160 330 270
TD 21 2 1 2 1 1 0 1 INJ 1 3 1 2 1 3 2
INT 8 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 INJ 1 1 1 0 0 1 0
Ru Yards 505 30 40 55 25 40 60 25 INJ 55 25 15 55 20 35 25
Ru TD 6 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 INJ 1 0 0 1 0 1 0
QB Kirk Cousins 25 7.5 7.5 22.5 22.5 400 65 70 265
TD 1 0 0 1
INT 0 0 0 0
Ru Yards 5 0 0 5
Ru TD 0 0 0 0
RB Alfred Morris 24 16.4 15.5 246 233 1400 105 85 90 120 115 70 90 125 65 45 75 105 120 80 110
Ru TD 14 2 0 1 2 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 2 1 1
Re Yards 90 5 0 10 0 0 10 5 0 15 0 5 10 5 10 15
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 13 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 2 1 1 2
RB Chris Thompson 22 4.5 2.6 67 39 190 15 0 10 25 5 20 10 10 5 35 15 10 0 15 15
Ru TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Re Yards 200 5 15 15 0 10 5 35 5 15 25 15 0 10 45 0
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 28 1 3 2 0 1 2 4 1 3 3 2 0 2 4 0
WR Pierre Garcon 27 15.8 10.9 205 142 1000 85 70 115 80 65 55 30 70 INJ INJ 70 110 90 125 35
Re TD 7 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 INJ INJ 0 1 1 2 0
Rec 63 5 4 7 6 5 4 3 4 INJ INJ 6 5 4 8 2
WR Santana Moss 34 6.8 4.1 102.5 61.5 555 40 55 40 25 20 45 55 55 80 25 20 10 15 35 35
Re TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 41 3 3 4 2 2 3 4 3 6 2 2 1 1 3 2
WR Leonard Hankerson 24 7.8 4.9 109 68 500 30 45 70 20 50 15 0 30 65 INJ 35 25 20 45 50
Re TD 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 INJ 0 0 0 0 1
Rec 41 2 4 6 2 5 1 0 2 5 INJ 3 2 2 4 3
WR Josh Morgan 28 3.6 2 54.5 30.5 245 20 0 15 10 10 0 25 40 30 40 0 15 0 5 35
Re TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 24 2 0 2 1 1 0 2 4 3 4 0 1 0 1 3
WR Devery Henderson 31 5.6 4.3 84 65 410 55 0 15 35 75 10 30 0 15 60 0 45 10 45 15
Re TD 4 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Rec 19 2 0 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 3 0 2 1 2 1
TE Fred Davis 27 8.6 5.5 129.5 82.5 585 25 70 25 50 20 35 75 45 40 20 55 30 10 20 65
Re TD 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Rec 47 2 5 3 4 2 3 4 3 4 1 5 3 1 2 5
TE Jordan Reed 23 2.6 1.8 39 27 150 0 0 0 15 0 0 10 20 0 30 15 40 0 0 20
Re TD 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Rec 12 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 3 1 2 0 0 2

General overview: The Redskins claimed their first NFC East title in ages and return many of their key fantasy players, but despite all the positive reports to this point, the health of Griffin will be a question mark until he is able to play multiple games without incident at the same level he played at in 2012. RG3’s recovery isn’t the only one of note either; Garcon elected not to have surgery on the foot injury that limited him for a large part of last season. With the ex-Colt on the field, Washington has a passing game. Without him, they are in trouble in that area. Davis enjoyed a nice three-week run following Garcon’s injury before suffering his own injury, but he’s really more of a second read in a passing game that is designed for RG3 to make one read and improvise. It’s hard to imagine he’ll emerge as a bigger threat this season following an Achilles’ injury and the Redskins’ selection of Reed in April’s draft. Ironically, the one spot on this Mike Shanahan-coached team that doesn’t appear to have any mystery surrounding it is at the starting tailback spot. Despite adding very little in the passing game, Morris left little doubt he was the best runner of the group, making the identity of his third-down complement (and important fantasy handcuff) the biggest question in Washington’s running game. Since Shanahan loves to play games at running back, don’t expect an answer for at least another month.

Matchup analysis: Washington couldn’t have asked for a much more forgiving schedule against the run before the bye, although Green Bay and Detroit should be at least a little better stopping it than they were last season. Still, Morris has a legitimate shot to be fantasy’s top back heading into the break. The Redskins face a stiffer challenge after the bye with road games in Denver and Minnesota as well as a home game with San Francisco, but Morris should be primed for another incredible fantasy season if he is able to withstand the same kind of workload he enjoyed in 2012. Griffin and Garcon should also enjoy the pre-bye slate, but Garcon could be in for a tough run right after the break if he isn’t 100%. In successive weeks, he will see plenty of Morris Claiborne/Brandon Carr, Tim Jennings/Charles Tilllman and Champ Bailey/Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie. In two of the next three weeks, he’ll draw what should be the improved pass defenses of Minnesota and San Francisco. Griffin will remain a viable play during this stretch because of his ability as a runner, but Washington doesn’t have enough offensive weapons in the passing game for RG3 to thrive every week. Despite facing the Niners in Week 12, four of the Redskins’ final five games during the fantasy season are at home, which should only help an offense that has reason to believe it will finish strong. The defensive back play – be it at cornerback, safety or both – for each of Washington’s three opponents during the fantasy playoffs is questionable at best.

Suggestions, comments, about the article or fantasy football in general? E-mail me or follow me on Twitter.


Doug Orth has written for FF Today since 2006 and appeared in USA Today’s Fantasy Football Preview magazine in 2010 and 2011. He hosted USA Today’s hour-long, pre-kickoff fantasy football internet chat every Sunday this past season. Doug regularly appears as a fantasy football analyst on Sirius XM’s “Fantasy Drive” and for 106.7 The Fan (WJFK – Washington, D.C). He is also a member of the Fantasy Sports Writers Association.