| 
  
                
  
 A d v e r t i s e m e n t In case you hadn’t noticed, fantasy 
                football is a bit like my full-time job away from my full-time 
                job. And there is nothing wrong with that; there’s a big 
                difference between working hard at something you love to do and 
                simply working hard just to earn a paycheck. As fantasy football continues to grow year after year, so does 
                the sophistication of the average football fan. When I first started 
                Preseason Matchup Analysis for public consumption back in 2008, 
                it was a noble concept that needed more information than I had 
                available to me at the time. As more and more sites have found 
                their way into the public consciousness and established certain 
                metrics that help break down the game, my knowledge of the game 
                and ability to deliver a finer product has also increased. In 
                the beginning, it was enough to consider a team like Baltimore 
                or Pittsburgh to be bad news for every fantasy player they faced. 
                Now, my PMAs consider factors such as the likelihood of how often 
                a certain receiver will play in the slot against how often he 
                may square off against the defense’s best corner – 
                and how he matches up against him physically. While it is a long 
                process, it is a worthwhile exercise. It is this kind of painstaking detail that I believe sets “Preseason 
                Matchup Analysis” apart from any other projection method 
                in the business. While last year’s ranks and numbers are 
                considered when predicting game-by-game totals, consistently successful 
                prognosticators and fantasy owners typically “see the future” 
                better than their counterparts. No method is foolproof or all-encompassing; 
                for every Doug Martin, Arian Foster or Eric Decker breakout I 
                get right, there will always the players like Cecil Shorts that 
                go from third- or fourth-string on their team’s depth chart 
                to fantasy stardom. Also, every set of projections has some bias attached to them; 
                the trick is running the bias through enough filters in order 
                to minimize the impact of it, which I believe this method does. 
                One of the main tenets of my method is based on the notion that 
                elite players will be elite about 75% of the time or more regardless 
                of the matchup. But elite fantasy players are simply the foundation 
                of your team. In order to consistently make the playoffs and succeed 
                in the fantasy postseason, “little things” such as 
                potential matchups play a vital role in determining which good 
                players will perform at an elite level in that week. This method 
                is all about increasing your likelihood of success during the 
                playoffs – a time where there is usually very little separating 
                each of the remaining teams. Quite often, the best businesses (and their practices) in the 
                real world are the ones that are the most transparent and adaptable 
                to change. It’s hard to be more transparent than I am each 
                year with my projections. As for the ability to change, one preseason 
                injury to a key offensive player can cause a ripple effect to 
                the entire team’s projections while an injury to a key defensive 
                player can do the same to each of their opponents. While it sounds 
                like a lot of work – and it is – it is necessary because 
                those “ripple effects” are felt on the field as well. 
                (Art imitating reality…what a wonderful concept!) Here’s a quick explanation of what each of the colors mean 
                in each team’s projection chart below:
 Red – A very difficult matchup. 
                For lower-level players, a red matchup means they should not be 
                used in fantasy that week. For a second- or third-tier player, 
                drop your expectations for them at least one grade that week (i.e. 
                from WR2 to WR3). For elite players, expect them to perform one 
                level lower than their usual status (i.e. RB1 performs like a 
                RB2). Yellow – Keep expectations 
                fairly low in this matchup. For lower-level players, a yellow 
                matchup is a borderline start at best. For a second- or third-tier 
                player, they can probably overcome the matchup if things fall 
                right. For the elite players, expect slightly better than average 
                production. White – Basically, this matchup 
                is one that could go either way. In some cases, I just don’t 
                feel like I have a good feel yet for this defense. Generally speaking, 
                these matchups are winnable matchups for all levels of players. Green – It doesn’t 
                get much better than this. For non-elite players, the stage is 
                basically set for said player to exploit the matchup. For the 
                elite player, this matchup should produce special numbers. For an example as to the amount of possibilities and factors 
                I consider, take a look below at New England’s projections. 
                Danny Amendola does not have a single “red” on his 
                schedule because most defenses that have clear No. 1 CBs usually 
                have them play certain sides of the field and do not use them 
                as “shadows”. And for the teams that use “shadows”, 
                almost none of them use that player to guard a slot receiver, 
                which is where Amendola will spend a great deal of his time. And 
                really, that is just the tip of the iceberg when I hammer out 
                these projections. As you can tell, a lot of thought goes into 
                this. Here are some final notes to help you understand what you see 
                below in the tables: 
 Notes:
 
 
                The gray highlight in each team’s schedule reflects 
                  a road game and the numbers above them correspond to the weeks 
                  of the season.
 
These are my initial projections and therefore subject 
                  to change. In a few cases, the changes will be dramatic. Changes 
                  may come in the form of a different-colored matchup and/or a 
                  player’s “game log”. In some cases, a strong 
                  preseason may warrant the inclusion of one name in a team projection 
                  and the removal of another.
 
For all those readers whose eyes gravitate immediately 
                  to the player’s final numbers: they are 15-game totals 
                  because most fantasy seasons have a Week 16 title game. Additionally, 
                  players with fewer than 10 projected catches or 100 projected 
                  yards have been removed, which will explain the discrepancy 
                  in some of the quarterback’s final numbers.
 
The age you see by each player will be that player’s 
                  age as of September 1, 2013. 
  Key to the table below: PPR Aver - Points 
                per game in full-point PPR leagues where all touchdowns are worth 
                six points.NPPR Aver - Points per game in non-PPR 
                leagues where all touchdowns are worth six points.
 PPR - Total points scored in PPR
 Non-PPR - Total points scored in 
                non-PPR.
 
 AFC East
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Buffalo Bills |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | NE | CAR | NYJ | BAL | CLE | CIN | MIA | NO | KC | PIT | NYJ | bye | ATL | TB | JAC | MIA |   
                        | QB | Kevin Kolb | 29 | 16.5 | 16.5 | 132.1 | 132.1 | 1740 |  | 240 | 185 | 160 | INJ | INJ | 285 | 275 | 340 | 190 | 65 | BEN |  | BEN | BEN | BEN | BEN |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 12 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 | INJ | INJ | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | BEN |  | BEN | BEN | BEN | BEN |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 10 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | INJ | INJ | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | BEN |  | BEN | BEN | BEN | BEN |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 45 |  | 5 | 10 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 5 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 5 | BEN |  | BEN | BEN | BEN | BEN |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | BEN |  | BEN | BEN | BEN | BEN |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | QB | EJ 
                          Manuel | 23 | 15.4 | 15.4 | 138.3 | 138.3 | 1770 |  |  |  | 110 | 185 | 205 |  |  |  |  | 85 | 220 |  | 265 | 215 | 275 | 210 |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  | 0 | 1 | 1 |  |  |  |  | 0 | 1 |  | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 10 |  |  |  | 0 | 2 | 1 |  |  |  |  | 0 | 2 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 215 |  |  |  | 35 | 25 | 25 |  |  |  |  | 10 | 25 |  | 40 | 15 | 25 | 15 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  | 1 | 0 | 0 |  |  |  |  | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | C.J. Spiller | 26 | 19.5 | 15.5 | 293 | 233 | 1205 |  | 85 | 130 | 55 | 70 | 125 | 70 | 30 | 65 | 105 | 65 | 105 |  | 55 | 50 | 120 | 75 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 8 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 525 |  | 50 | 25 | 60 | 20 | 15 | 75 | 0 | 60 | 40 | 20 | 20 |  | 65 | 25 | 15 | 35 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 60 |  | 5 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 |  | 7 | 4 | 3 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Fred Jackson | 32 | 9.3 | 7.9 | 121.5 | 102.5 | 520 |  | 45 | 35 | 30 | 25 | 40 | 40 | 65 | 35 | INJ | INJ | 45 |  | 30 | 40 | 65 | 25 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 145 |  | 5 | 0 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 25 | 20 | INJ | INJ | 0 |  | 10 | 0 | 25 | 20 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 19 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2 | INJ | INJ | 0 |  | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Steve Johnson | 27 | 15.2 | 10 | 228 | 150 | 1080 |  | 65 | 55 | 80 | 40 | 50 | 85 | 105 | 90 | 70 | 40 | 135 |  | 85 | 55 | 85 | 40 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 78 |  | 5 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 10 |  | 5 | 4 | 6 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Robert Woods | 21 | 8.1 | 4.9 | 121 | 74 | 560 |  | 35 | 20 | 45 | 50 | 45 | 30 | 25 | 45 | 35 | 45 | 15 |  | 40 | 65 | 25 | 40 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 47 |  | 3 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 |  | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Da’Rick 
                          Rogers | 22 | 6 | 3.8 | 77.5 | 49.5 | 375 |  | 15 | 0 | 20 | 25 | 60 | INJ | 70 | 45 | 25 | INJ | 40 |  | 20 | 0 | 35 | 20 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 1 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 28 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | INJ | 4 | 4 | 2 | INJ | 4 |  | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | T.J. Graham | 24 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 50 | 34 | 280 |  | 35 | 60 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 20 | 0 |  | 0 | 25 | 55 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 16 |  | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Marquise Goodwin | 22 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 24.5 | 17.5 | 115 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 10 | 15 | 0 | 10 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Scott Chandler | 28 | 4.2 | 2.9 | 63.5 | 43.5 | 195 |  | 15 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 15 | 0 | 20 | 15 | 10 |  | 15 | 0 | 25 | 10 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 20 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Chris Gragg | 23 | 4.5 | 2.6 | 49.5 | 28.5 | 225 |  | 20 | 15 | 40 | 15 | 0 | 40 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | 20 | 30 | 10 | 35 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 21 |  | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 |  |  General overview: Buffalo added a 
              lot of young talent on the offensive side of the ball, particularly 
              at receiver. Woods should be a steady 6-to-10 year pro while Rogers 
              could easily become the top receiver on the team in a few years 
              assuming he can stay out of trouble off the field. The Bills hope 
              they found their future at quarterback with the multi-dimensional 
              Manuel, but they will almost certainly be in trouble if he becomes 
              their present at any point this season. However, their strength 
              – and the focus of new HC Doug Marrone – will be on 
              the running game and Spiller in particular. Jackson will not be 
              forgotten, but all indications are that Spiller will finally get 
              the chance to do what former HC Chan Gailey drafted him to do (but 
              failed to follow through): be a Jamaal Charles clone and put the 
              offense on his back.
 Matchup analysis: While there is 
                no extended stretch of weak defenses, Buffalo will start off the 
                season with two home games, including one against a New England 
                team that could take a while to find itself and a Panthers’ 
                defense that will likely feature two rookies among their top three 
                defensive tackles and a defensive backfield that is a huge question 
                mark beyond top CB Josh Norman. The Bills will play four of six 
                on the road after hosting Carolina in Week 2, making that stretch 
                a critical one for an offense that wants to go up-tempo and run 
                the ball. During that six-week period, it will be difficult for 
                anyone outside of Spiller and Johnson to maintain any level of 
                consistency. Spiller’s all-purpose game will make him a 
                weekly 100 total-yard, one-score threat regardless of the opponent 
                while Marrone’s willingness to use Johnson in the slot on 
                a more regular basis – to avoid most teams’ top corners 
                and double teams – should allow him to take his fantasy 
                game to another level for as long as Kolb is the starter. By using 
                his team’s two most dynamic weapons in the manner in which 
                it appears he will use them, Marrone is setting up the rest of 
                his team for success despite a difficult schedule. The true wild-card 
                will be if Graham or Rogers can step up and be a legitimate threat 
                in addition to Woods, something only time will tell us.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Miami Dolphins |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | CLE | IND | ATL | NO | BAL | bye | BUF | NE | CIN | TB | SD | CAR | NYJ | PIT | NE | BUF |  
 | QB | Ryan Tannehill | 25 | 19.4 | 19.4 | 290.6 | 290.6 | 3940 |  | 230 | 315 | 285 | 265 | 185 |  | 265 | 275 | 300 | 255 | 305 | 290 | 260 | 215 | 225 | 270 |  
 |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 22 |  | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |  | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |  
 |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 14 |  | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |  
 |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 170 |  | 10 | 5 | 0 | 20 | 15 |  | 25 | 5 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 20 | 15 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Lamar Miller | 22 | 15.2 | 12.5 | 228 | 187 | 1125 |  | 65 | 75 | 85 | 110 | 45 |  | 50 | 70 | 75 | 30 | 110 | 120 | 65 | 40 | 75 | 110 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 325 |  | 15 | 35 | 20 | 15 | 15 |  | 35 | 25 | 20 | 55 | 20 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 15 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 41 |  | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 |  | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Daniel Thomas | 25 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 51 | 46 | 190 |  | 15 | 15 | 10 | INJ | 15 |  | 0 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 35 | INJ | INJ | 15 | 20 | 35 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 1 | 1 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 30 |  | 0 | 0 | 5 | INJ | 0 |  | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 5 | 5 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | INJ | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 1 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Mike Gillislee | 22 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 48.5 | 35.5 | 190 |  | 0 | 10 | 15 | 15 | 30 |  | 20 | 10 | 20 | 10 | 0 | 25 | 25 | INJ | 10 | 0 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 105 |  | 5 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 10 |  | 10 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 15 | INJ | 10 | 15 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 13 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | INJ | 1 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Mike Wallace | 27 | 15.3 | 10.8 | 229.5 | 161.5 | 1135 |  | 35 | 110 | 90 | 120 | 50 |  | 35 | 80 | 110 | 40 | 125 | 115 | 40 | 75 | 50 | 60 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 8 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 68 |  | 3 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 3 |  | 2 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Brian Hartline | 26 | 10.5 | 6.8 | 157.5 | 102.5 | 785 |  | 60 | 45 | 70 | 75 | 35 |  | 60 | 50 | 35 | 55 | 40 | 45 | 70 | 35 | 45 | 65 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 55 |  | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 2 |  | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Brandon Gibson | 26 | 3.4 | 2.1 | 51 | 31 | 250 |  | 15 | 0 | 25 | 10 | 0 |  | 40 | 0 | 30 | 15 | 0 | 55 | 20 | 25 | 15 | 0 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 20 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |  | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Armon Binns | 23 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 34 | 18 | 180 |  | 20 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 10 |  | 15 | 25 | 30 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 10 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 16 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Rishard Matthews | 23 | 2.7 | 1.9 | 41 | 28 | 220 |  | 25 | 40 | 0 | 15 | 0 |  | 15 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 10 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 40 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 13 |  | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | Dustin Keller | 28 | 11.5 | 7.4 | 172.5 | 110.5 | 745 |  | 45 | 65 | 35 | 25 | 50 |  | 45 | 55 | 70 | 35 | 50 | 50 | 80 | 25 | 70 | 45 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 62 |  | 4 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 5 |  | 3 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 3 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | Charles Clay | 24 | 2.6 | 1.5 | 39.5 | 22.5 | 165 |  | 10 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 15 |  | 10 | 15 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 25 | 0 | 15 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 17 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |  | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |  |  General overview: GM Jeff Ireland is going for broke in a way only 
              redraft fantasy owners could love. Wallace may not have been the 
              greatest “scheme fit” per se, but he was the best receiver 
              on the market and landed on a team desperate for his big-play ability. 
              Keller adds a presence at tight end the team hasn’t seen since 
              the days of a young (and productive) Randy McMichael. The Dolphins 
              have thrown their belief behind new LT Jonathan Martin –who 
              will take over for Jake Long – but smartly nabbed one of the 
              better free-agent options to replace Martin at right tackle in Tyson 
              Clabo. The team has been singing the praises all offseason of Miller, 
              who should be the lead back – if not the feature back – 
              assuming he shows the kind of pass-protection chops he has displayed 
              in mini-camp and OTAs. Tannehill surpassed expectations in a big 
              way as a rookie considering Hartline was his top option. A common 
              NFL axiom says players improve the most between their first and 
              second season, which puts Tannehill in prime position to be a top 
              12-15 fantasy quarterback with all of his new weapons.
 Matchup analysis: Assuming new Browns DC Ray Horton will use 
                CB Joe Haden as a “shadow”, Wallace could have a difficult 
                Week 1, but he has a great shot of going into the bye with at 
                least three high-quality starts. His post-bye slate is a different 
                story as he’ll likely see plenty of the Bills’ Stephon 
                Gilmore (twice), a potentially healthy Darrelle Revis and Antonio 
                Cromartie – just to name a few. The way their matchups line 
                up this season, it is possible most of Keller’s good games 
                will come during Wallace’s “off” games. The 
                pre-bye schedule is loaded with solid cover safeties, but the 
                post-bye part is not, meaning it will be important for the offensive 
                braintrust to be creative with their formations early on in order 
                to get Keller matched up with a linebacker as often as possible. 
                Hartline will obviously not see another 74-catch season anytime 
                soon, but there aren’t many opponents on the schedule with 
                the personnel to match up comfortably with him now that he is 
                the No. 2 receiver. In other words, Hartline – and the entire 
                passing game for that matter – should be much more consistent 
                in 2013. Somewhat like Spiller, Miller’s versatility should 
                keep his value afloat despite a challenging list of tough run 
                defenses from the AFC North, Tampa Bay and the improved units 
                in Miami’s own division (Jets and Bills). Unlike last season, 
                Tannehill has enough firepower to compete against any defense, 
                so it will be critical that he can make the transition from being 
                a signal-caller reliant on Hartline in 2012 to a spread-the-wealth 
                quarterback in 2013. He’s more than capable of doing just 
                that.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | New England Patriots |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | BUF | NYJ | TB | ATL | CIN | NO | NYJ | MIA | PIT | bye | CAR | DEN | HOU | CLE | MIA | BAL |  
 | QB | Tom Brady | 36 | 20.3 | 20.3 | 304.8 | 304.8 | 4070 |  | 240 | 290 | 255 | 345 | 255 | 310 | 245 | 185 | 220 |  | 270 | 265 | 315 | 330 | 285 | 260 |  
 |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 23 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 |  
 |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 8 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 20 |  | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Stevan Ridley | 24 | 12.1 | 11.7 | 181 | 175 | 1100 |  | 85 | 100 | 55 | 90 | 70 | 120 | 90 | 35 | 60 |  | 110 | 60 | 70 | 90 | 45 | 20 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 10 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 50 |  | 0 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |  | 10 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 5 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Shane Vereen | 24 | 14.8 | 10.4 | 177.5 | 124.5 | 405 |  | 40 | 25 | 25 | 35 | 20 | 20 | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | 20 | 30 | 25 | 65 | 70 | 30 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 480 |  | 55 | 25 | 70 | 50 | 35 | 50 | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | 15 | 65 | 25 | 40 | 35 | 15 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 53 |  | 5 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 6 | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Brandon Bolden | 23 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 67.5 | 63.5 | 430 |  | 15 | 20 | 5 | 15 | 20 | 45 | 30 | 70 | 35 |  | 85 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 50 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 25 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Danny Amendola | 27 | 17.1 | 9.9 | 205.5 | 118.5 | 945 |  | 75 | 105 | 80 | 105 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 60 | 75 |  | 85 | 55 | 75 | 105 | 85 | 40 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 87 |  | 8 | 10 | 7 | 9 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 6 | 8 |  | 8 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Julian Edelman | 27 | 9.2 | 5.3 | 101.5 | 58.5 | 465 |  | 40 | 50 | 25 | 30 | 75 | 85 | 40 | INJ | INJ |  | INJ | INJ | 45 | 25 | 15 | 35 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ |  | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 43 |  | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 4 | INJ | INJ |  | INJ | INJ | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Aaron Dobson | 22 | 7.5 | 4.9 | 112 | 74 | 560 |  | 35 | 45 | 55 | 65 | 50 | 35 | 30 | 0 | 30 |  | 60 | 20 | 35 | 25 | 45 | 30 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 38 |  | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 |  | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Donald Jones | 25 | 5.6 | 3.1 | 84 | 47 | 410 |  | 25 | 20 | 0 | 30 | 30 | 25 | 55 | 40 | 20 |  | 35 | 15 | 20 | 45 | 15 | 35 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 37 |  | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 2 |  | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Josh Boyce | 23 | 2.7 | 2 | 40.5 | 30.5 | 245 |  | 0 | 20 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 10 |  | 0 | 45 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 40 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 10 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | Rob Gronkowski | 24 | 15.5 | 10.1 | 170 | 111 | 690 |  | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | 45 | 70 | 85 | 65 | 60 |  | 50 | 60 | 50 | 70 | 80 | 55 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 59 |  | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | 4 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 5 |  | 5 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | Zach Sudfield | 24 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 38 | 22 | 160 |  | 10 | 20 | 15 | 25 | 10 | 0 | 20 | 15 | 0 |  | 15 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 16 |  | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |  |  General overview: The Patriots are annually one of the more difficult 
              teams to project each season, but this year will be more difficult 
              than most with so many questions and so few answers. Aaron Hernandez 
              is in jail, Wes Welker and Danny Woodhead are gone while Gronkowski’s 
              injury status is uncertain. Most of the replacements (potential 
              replacement in Gronk’s case) are young and none of them are 
              as decorated or as good as the departed/injured players. The common 
              belief is that New England will lean more heavily on the running 
              game and use Vereen as its new “matchup nightmare”, 
              but don’t discount the possibility of the Patriots only slightly 
              dialing down their slot-heavy passing offense, using Amendola and 
              Edelman to fill the void inside the hashmarks left behind by Welker 
              and Hernandez.
 Matchup analysis: Because Amendola will be doing most of his 
                damage from the slot, his fantasy owners don’t have a lot 
                to worry about for most of the season until the second half of 
                the season when he could square off against top-10 slot CBs – 
                per Pro Football Focus – Chris Harris (Denver) and Brice 
                McCain (Houston) as well as renowned Ravens slot CB Lardarius 
                Webb. The road will not be nearly as smooth for whichever receiver 
                wins Brandon Lloyd’s old job – be it Edelman, Dobson, 
                Jones or even Michael Jenkins. It is another reason why Vereen 
                should be on fantasy owners’ radar as a high-upside RB3 
                in PPR leagues since he will more than likely assume all of Woodhead’s 
                116 offensive touches from a season ago and then some, regardless 
                of whether or not Gronkowski misses significant regular-season 
                action. New England has actually possessed one of the better run-blocking 
                offensive lines in recent years and is young enough up front to 
                keep it going for a while longer, so whatever the Patriots’ 
                running backs lost in terms of the space created by the passing 
                game, they should make up for in 2013 with volume. New England 
                faces some potentially difficult matchups against the run in Tampa 
                Bay, Pittsburgh, Houston and Baltimore – to name a few – 
                but should rank among the top rushing teams in the league again 
                in 2013.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | New York Jets |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | TB | NE | BUF | TEN | ATL | PIT | NE | CIN | NO | bye | BUF | BAL | MIA | OAK | CAR | CLE |  
 | QB | Mark Sanchez | 26 | 9.7 | 9.7 | 87 | 87 | 1600 |  | 135 | 135 | 220 | 245 | 155 | 170 | 235 | 200 | 105 |  | BEN | BEN | BEN | BEN | BEN | BEN |  
 |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | BEN | BEN | BEN | BEN | BEN | BEN |  
 |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 11 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  | BEN | BEN | BEN | BEN | BEN | BEN |  
 |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 30 |  | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 5 |  | BEN | BEN | BEN | BEN | BEN | BEN |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | BEN | BEN | BEN | BEN | BEN | BEN |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | QB | Geno Smith | 22 | 10 | 10 | 100.2 | 100.2 | 1455 |  | 55 | 30 |  |  | 35 |  |  |  | 155 |  | 260 | 175 | 215 | 155 | 235 | 140 |  
 |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 8 |  | 0 | 0 |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 1 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  
 |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 10 |  | 1 | 0 |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 1 |  | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 |  
 |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 80 |  | 5 | 0 |  |  | 5 |  |  |  | 15 |  | 10 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 10 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Chris Ivory | 25 | 11.2 | 10.4 | 146 | 135 | 830 |  | 35 | 55 | 65 | INJ | 55 | 45 | 35 | 80 | 110 |  | 55 | 40 | INJ | 120 | 75 | 60 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | INJ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | INJ | 2 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 100 |  | 15 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 15 |  | 20 | 10 | INJ | 10 | 15 | 0 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 11 |  | 2 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 2 | 1 | INJ | 1 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Bilal Powell | 24 | 4.4 | 3.5 | 61 | 49 | 280 |  | 15 | 20 | 15 | 75 | 15 | 25 | 5 | 0 | 35 |  | 10 | 20 | 25 | 10 | INJ | 10 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | INJ | 0 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 90 |  | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 0 |  | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 12 |  | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Mike Goodson | 26 | 10.5 | 7.8 | 125.5 | 93.5 | 385 |  | 25 | 30 | 35 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 50 | 25 | 10 |  | 40 | 25 | 55 | 35 | 35 | 20 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 310 |  | 35 | 20 | 15 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 25 | 30 | 55 |  | 20 | 15 | 25 | 15 | 40 | 15 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 32 |  | 3 | 2 | 3 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 2 | 4 | 3 |  | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Santonio Holmes | 29 | 8.3 | 5.1 | 49.5 | 30.5 | 245 |  | PUP | PUP | PUP | PUP | PUP | PUP | PUP | PUP | PUP |  | 25 | 40 | 35 | 55 | 70 | 20 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | PUP | PUP | PUP | PUP | PUP | PUP | PUP | PUP | PUP |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 19 |  | PUP | PUP | PUP | PUP | PUP | PUP | PUP | PUP | PUP |  | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Stephen Hill | 22 | 8.8 | 5.9 | 106 | 71 | 530 |  | 0 | 20 | 40 | 55 | 80 | 35 | 40 | 55 | 35 |  | 65 | 45 | 60 | INJ | INJ | INJ |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | INJ | INJ | INJ |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 35 |  | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 |  | 5 | 3 | 3 | INJ | INJ | INJ |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Jeremy Kerley | 24 | 9.3 | 5.7 | 140 | 85 | 670 |  | 40 | 65 | 45 | 70 | 40 | 25 | 30 | 55 | 75 |  | 45 | 10 | 55 | 30 | 20 | 65 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 55 |  | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 6 |  | 4 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Ben Obomanu | 29 | 5 | 2.9 | 75 | 44 | 380 |  | 35 | 25 | 50 | 30 | 10 | 30 | 50 | 20 | 25 |  | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 45 | 20 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 31 |  | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 |  | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | Jeff Cumberland | 26 | 5.1 | 3 | 77 | 45 | 330 |  | 30 | 25 | 35 | 40 | 20 | 15 | 40 | 30 | 0 |  | 20 | 25 | 0 | 20 | 20 | 10 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 32 |  | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 |  | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | Hayden Smith | 28 | 3.7 | 2.4 | 55 | 36 | 240 |  | 10 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 15 | 40 | 20 | 0 | 15 |  | 45 | 20 | 15 | 25 | 0 | 10 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 19 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 |  | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |  |  General overview: Like just about every other team in this division, 
              there is a great deal of uncertainty on offense. However, no team 
              is in worse shape than the Jets, who will enter training camp with 
              a quarterback “competition” and very little proven (or 
              healthy) talent at receiver. New York dropped OC Tony Sparano in 
              the offseason and replaced him with West Coast offense aficionado 
              Marty Mornhinweg, but the play-calling upgrade will mean very little 
              unless Sanchez or Smith can pull a rabbit out of their hat. (In 
              fact, Mornhinweg should be declared an offensive mastermind and 
              in line for another head-coaching job in 2014 if he is able to make 
              this passing game respectable.) As of mid-June, Holmes was still 
              unable to run or cut on his surgically-repaired foot following his 
              grade-four Lisfranc fracture – the most serious kind. Hill 
              (knee) is also recovering from a surgery, but showed very little 
              after Week 1 and isn’t a great fit for the new offense. The 
              only intriguing fantasy option might be Ivory, but even that optimism 
              should be tempered due to his violent running style and the likelihood 
              he will miss some games because of it. Goodson could be an excellent 
              complement and a top fantasy handcuff, but he will likely be facing 
              some kind of punishment from the league and/or legal system at some 
              point this season and isn’t the most durable player to boot.
 Matchup analysis: Due to the personnel shortcomings of ex-GM 
                Mike Tannenbaum, the Jets have a number of offensive position 
                “battles” and very little in terms of clarity. About 
                the only thing that seems certain is that Ivory will carry the 
                load for as long as he can; although between high-scoring offenses 
                that could make the Jets abandon the running game early and tough 
                rushing defenses, Ivory will have his work cut out for him throughout 
                most of his schedule. The ex-Saint could be a fantasy playoff 
                stud assuming the Raiders and Panthers don’t make an incredible 
                leap in their ability to stop the run, however. Sanchez will probably 
                begin the season as the starter despite playing about as poorly 
                as he could have last season, but is almost certain to lose his 
                job at some point to Smith. The rookie should be an upgrade, but 
                expecting him to provide some kind of spark with the Jets’ 
                mediocre talent at receiver and their difficult schedule is asking 
                a lot. (In the interest of full disclosure, my expectation is 
                that Holmes will begin the regular season on the Physically Unable 
                to Perform list, which is why his highlights match Hill’s 
                over that time.) It is rare to write off an entire half of one 
                team’s offense before the season starts, but there is no 
                guarantee Holmes will return to the field healthy or that Hill 
                will take a huge stride forward, leaving Kerley as the receiver 
                most likely to carry the most fantasy value.
 NFC East
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Dallas Cowboys |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | NYG | KC | STL | SD | DEN | WAS | PHI | DET | MIN | NO | bye | NYG | OAK | CHI | GB | WAS |  
 | QB | Tony Romo | 33 | 22.3 | 22.3 | 334.4 | 334.4 | 4360 |  | 315 | 245 | 230 | 285 | 310 | 315 | 275 | 290 | 235 | 335 |  | 335 | 290 | 260 | 350 | 290 |  
 |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 29 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 |  | 0 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 |  
 |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 12 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |  
 |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 40 |  | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |  | 10 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | DeMarco Murray | 25 | 16.9 | 13.9 | 202.5 | 166.5 | 950 |  | 75 | 85 | 115 | 80 | 50 | 35 | 110 | 45 | INJ | INJ |  | INJ | 150 | 85 | 45 | 75 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | INJ | INJ |  | INJ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 295 |  | 35 | 15 | 25 | 10 | 45 | 10 | 10 | 25 | INJ | INJ |  | INJ | 15 | 25 | 55 | 25 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ |  | INJ | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 36 |  | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | INJ | INJ |  | INJ | 1 | 4 | 7 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Joseph Randle | 21 | 7.4 | 5.9 | 111.5 | 88.5 | 485 |  | 20 | 25 | 15 | 10 | 35 | 25 | 15 | 70 | 45 | 85 |  | 45 | 15 | 20 | 45 | 15 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 160 |  | 15 | 10 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 25 | 20 | 20 |  | 15 | 5 | 0 | 15 | 5 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 23 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |  | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Dez Bryant | 24 | 19.9 | 13.9 | 298.5 | 208.5 | 1365 |  | 85 | 60 | 65 | 115 | 45 | 110 | 125 | 105 | 55 | 120 |  | 110 | 90 | 85 | 95 | 100 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 12 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 90 |  | 6 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 7 |  | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Miles Austin | 29 | 11.9 | 7.7 | 167 | 108 | 780 |  | 45 | 45 | 55 | 75 | 35 | 50 | 80 | INJ | 85 | 55 |  | 45 | 80 | 45 | 35 | 50 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | INJ | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 59 |  | 4 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 4 | INJ | 6 | 4 |  | 3 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Dwayne Harris | 25 | 3.5 | 2.1 | 42.5 | 25.5 | 195 |  | 25 | 20 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 20 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | 15 | 0 | 35 | 25 | 30 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 17 |  | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Terrance Williams | 23 | 6 | 4.4 | 90 | 66 | 420 |  | 30 | 35 | 25 | 0 | 25 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 55 |  | 45 | 55 | 10 | 40 | 0 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 24 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 |  | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | Jason Witten | 31 | 14 | 8.1 | 210 | 121 | 970 |  | 70 | 55 | 40 | 60 | 120 | 65 | 50 | 75 | 60 | 70 |  | 85 | 30 | 60 | 75 | 55 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 89 |  | 7 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 12 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 4 | 7 |  | 6 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 5 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | Gavin Escobar | 22 | 2.6 | 1.7 | 39.5 | 25.5 | 135 |  | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 15 |  | 20 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 25 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 14 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |  |  General overview: From a personnel perspective, very little has 
              changed in Dallas. Outside of adding a fifth-round rookie in Randle 
              the team hopes can “mirror” Murray, the only other notable 
              change among the skill positions is at receiver – where either 
              Harris or Williams is expected to win the job behind Bryant and 
              Austin. However, the Cowboys did not maintain the status quo as 
              owner Jerry Jones stripped the play-calling duties from Jason Garrett 
              and gave them to Bill Callahan, who is expected to place more of 
              the offensive responsibility on the running game. It’s a noble 
              goal, but Murray will have to stay healthy for the first time in 
              his NFL career in order for the Cowboys to stick with it since Randle 
              lacks the third-year back’s game-breaking talent. The addition 
              of first-round G-C Travis Frederick should help immensely, but it 
              will be important for the team to stay healthy up front this season 
              in order to execute Callahan’s vision. Witten is a proven 
              chain-mover and Bryant took a huge step forward in 2012 to become 
              the team’s go-to receiver, so Callahan’s plan to bring 
              more balance to the offense will probably only last as long as Murray 
              can remain off the injury report.
 Matchup analysis: In addition to matching up with at least two 
                rebuilding teams in the AFC West, a game against New Orleans and 
                a division full of teams with average-at-best cornerbacks – 
                outside of its own – Dallas has enough plus-matchups to 
                do some damage in the passing game if it chooses to go that route 
                at some point. Kansas City, St. Louis and Denver will each challenge 
                Bryant and Austin over the first five weeks, but beyond that, 
                it could be argued that Minnesota and Chicago are the only teams 
                that should make their owners pause over the remainder of the 
                fantasy season. In PPR leagues, Witten is virtually matchup-proof 
                in part because Romo leans on him so heavily and because defenses 
                will gladly give him his 5-8 yard receptions as opposed to watching 
                Bryant and Austin beat them downfield. Murray is a physical back 
                whose body has betrayed him through two NFL seasons. Although 
                he has been “injury-plagued”, he is not “injury-prone” 
                (in terms of dealing with a chronic injury) in the same way a 
                back like Darren McFadden is, which makes him more unlucky than 
                cursed. If his body holds up in 2013, Murray’s slate is 
                advantageous to a breakout season – not only does Dallas 
                plan on running more of its offense through him, but also because 
                of the absence of potentially elite run defenses. Murray’s 
                abilities as a receiver will keep him viable in fantasy during 
                any shootout or blowout, so the only question will be if he can 
                break the 200-carry mark for the first time in his NFL career.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | New York Giants |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | DAL | DEN | CAR | KC | PHI | CHI | MIN | PHI | bye | OAK | GB | DAL | WAS | SD | SEA | DET |  
 | QB | Eli Manning | 32 | 20.5 | 20.5 | 308.1 | 308.1 | 3965 |  | 230 | 270 | 240 | 305 | 200 | 235 | 320 | 305 |  | 240 | 260 | 280 | 325 | 265 | 190 | 300 |  
 |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 29 |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 |  
 |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 14 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 |  
 |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 35 |  | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | David Wilson | 22 | 13.8 | 12.3 | 193.5 | 171.5 | 1030 |  | 80 | 50 | 90 | 85 | 110 | 75 | 45 | 75 |  | 125 | 35 | INJ | 60 | 85 | 45 | 70 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 205 |  | 10 | 0 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 20 | 50 | 10 |  | 15 | 0 | INJ | 30 | 15 | 5 | 20 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 22 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | INJ | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Andre Brown | 26 | 12 | 10.7 | 168 | 150 | 620 |  | 50 | 30 | 25 | 45 | 20 | 45 | 55 | 35 |  | 45 | 70 | 90 | INJ | 25 | 35 | 50 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 13 |  | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 | INJ | 1 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 100 |  | 15 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 15 |  | 0 | 10 | 15 | INJ | 10 | 10 | 0 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 18 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |  | 0 | 2 | 3 | INJ | 1 | 2 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Hakeem Nicks | 25 | 15.7 | 10.5 | 203.5 | 136.5 | 945 |  | 50 | 80 | 105 | 60 | 80 | INJ | 30 | INJ |  | 55 | 105 | 65 | 125 | 105 | 40 | 45 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | INJ | 0 | INJ |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 67 |  | 4 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 6 | INJ | 2 | INJ |  | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Victor Cruz | 26 | 17.3 | 11.1 | 259 | 166 | 1180 |  | 70 | 80 | 80 | 115 | 65 | 85 | 125 | 75 |  | 45 | 90 | 50 | 85 | 70 | 35 | 110 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 8 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 93 |  | 5 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 6 |  | 3 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 8 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Rueben Randle | 22 | 9.3 | 6.1 | 139 | 91 | 610 |  | 35 | 35 | 15 | 55 | 20 | 35 | 75 | 90 |  | 45 | 20 | 40 | 20 | 35 | 40 | 50 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 48 |  | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 6 |  | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Ramses Barden | 27 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 20.5 | 10.5 | 105 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 20 |  | 10 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 15 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 10 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | Brandon Myers | 27 | 7.5 | 4.5 | 112 | 68 | 500 |  | 40 | 40 | 25 | 25 | 35 | 30 | 30 | 50 |  | 30 | 25 | 45 | 55 | 20 | 10 | 40 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 44 |  | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 5 |  | 3 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | Adrien Robinson | 24 | 3.5 | 2.4 | 53 | 36 | 180 |  | 0 | 10 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 30 |  | 15 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 35 | 20 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 17 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 |  |  General overview: One of the more intriguing storylines in 2013 
              – on the field as well as in fantasy – will be how much 
              the Giants choose to expand Wilson’s role. In terms of pure 
              explosiveness, the second-year back is the NFC’s answer to 
              Chris Johnson. But contrary to popular belief, he has a big hill 
              to climb in order to receive the same number of carries that Johnson 
              does on a yearly basis. First and foremost, the Giants have featured 
              a committee attack for years and will almost certainly give Brown 
              the goal-line work. Secondly, while it could be argued that Wilson’s 
              upside is higher than Ahmad Bradshaw’s ever was, Brown is 
              a better back than Brandon Jacobs was for most of his Giants’ 
              career. Last but not least, Wilson isn’t a complete back…yet. 
              At receiver, New York could be in the process of passing the torch 
              from Nicks to Randle. That is not to suggest that Nicks won’t 
              start and/or perform well when he is in the lineup, but if Randle 
              can carry over his performance in the offseason to the regular season, 
              the Giants may stick with Randle and decide to let Nicks sign a 
              huge free-agent deal with another team next offseason. A similar 
              transition could be taking place at tight end, where the team is 
              likely hoping that Robinson improves to the point that he can make 
              Myers expendable and give New York the same kind of production Martellus 
              Bennett did early last season.
 Matchup analysis: The Giants will be tested over the first month 
                of the season with three road games and three opponents (Dallas, 
                Denver and Kansas City) capable of making Manning & Co. work 
                for their yards. Chicago and Minnesota round out a fairly difficult 
                first-half schedule, but only Dallas and Seattle stick out as 
                opponents that could stymie Nicks and/or Randle after the bye. 
                (Cruz is excluded simply because he is nearly unguardable in the 
                slot, so it will take a special effort to shut him down.) The 
                running game should have an easier time of it in the first half 
                as the Cowboys, Panthers, Chiefs and Eagles (twice) are all undersized, 
                young up front or both. In fact, the only matchups that should 
                concern fantasy owners at this point would be against Denver (improved 
                defense plus the likelihood the game will turn into a shootout), 
                Minnesota and Seattle. Owners also need to recognize that in addition 
                to injuries and game situations, much will depend on whether we 
                see the 2011 or 2012 version of Manning. The Giants have the talent 
                to be an elite offense this year with top-level playmaking ability 
                at almost every position, but a repeat of Manning’s rollercoaster 
                2012 campaign could sabotage it in a hurry.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Philadelphia Eagles |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | WAS | SD | KC | DEN | NYG | TB | DAL | NYG | OAK | GB | WAS | bye | ARI | DET | MIN | CHI |  
 | QB | Nick Foles | 24 | 16.9 | 16.9 | 237 | 237 | 3400 |  | 245 | 285 | 280 | 150 | 260 | 85 | INJ | 320 | 160 | 260 | 255 |  | 235 | 305 | 265 | 295 |  
 |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 19 |  | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | INJ | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |  | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |  
 |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 13 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | INJ | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |  
 |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 70 |  | 10 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 15 | 0 | INJ | 5 | 0 | 15 | 0 |  | 0 | 5 | 0 | 10 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | QB | Michael Vick | 33 | 14.4 | 14.4 | 43.3 | 43.3 | 395 |  |  |  |  | 100 |  | 140 | 155 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 1 | 0 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 75 |  |  |  |  | 15 |  | 20 | 40 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 1 | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | LeSean McCoy | 25 | 18 | 14.5 | 270.5 | 217.5 | 1060 |  | 85 | 110 | 65 | 40 | 90 | 35 | 110 | 45 | 80 | 55 | 65 |  | 60 | 105 | 35 | 80 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 8 |  | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 455 |  | 25 | 15 | 35 | 75 | 15 | 25 | 15 | 35 | 25 | 30 | 35 |  | 15 | 35 | 25 | 50 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 53 |  | 2 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 |  | 2 | 5 | 3 | 6 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Bryce Brown | 22 | 10.5 | 9.2 | 157.5 | 137.5 | 860 |  | 65 | 35 | 90 | 30 | 55 | 55 | 110 | 35 | 125 | 25 | 40 |  | 85 | 40 | 35 | 35 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 155 |  | 10 | 25 | 0 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 15 |  | 10 | 5 | 10 | 0 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 20 |  | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 |  | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Jeremy Maclin | 25 | 11.3 | 7.5 | 157.5 | 104.5 | 745 |  | 45 | 35 | 40 | 25 | 65 | 80 | 20 | 55 | INJ | 65 | 50 |  | 85 | 40 | 75 | 65 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 1 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 53 |  | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 4 | INJ | 5 | 3 |  | 6 | 2 | 6 | 5 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | DeSean Jackson | 26 | 10.4 | 7.5 | 156 | 112 | 820 |  | 85 | 80 | 50 | 20 | 70 | 10 | 35 | 75 | 65 | 50 | 40 |  | 35 | 110 | 55 | 40 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 44 |  | 4 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 |  | 2 | 6 | 3 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Jason Avant | 30 | 4.2 | 2.4 | 55 | 31 | 250 |  | 10 | 20 | 0 | 30 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 35 | 55 |  | 40 | 20 | INJ | INJ |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 24 |  | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 |  | 4 | 2 | INJ | INJ |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Arrelious Benn | 24 | 6.7 | 4.1 | 80.5 | 49.5 | 375 |  | 25 | 45 | 65 | 20 | 25 | 30 | 0 | 30 | 25 | INJ | INJ |  | INJ | 35 | 20 | 55 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ |  | INJ | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 31 |  | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | INJ | INJ |  | INJ | 3 | 2 | 5 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | Brent Celek | 28 | 3.2 | 2 | 48 | 30 | 180 |  | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 15 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 25 |  | 0 | 10 | 20 | 20 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 18 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |  | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | James Casey | 28 | 7.4 | 4.6 | 104 | 64 | 520 |  | 45 | 35 | 65 | 25 | 40 | 25 | 10 | 50 | 15 | 50 | 35 |  | 35 | INJ | 50 | 40 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 40 |  | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 |  | 3 | INJ | 4 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | Zach Ertz | 22 | 4.4 | 2.7 | 57.5 | 35.5 | 295 |  | 0 | 20 | 25 | 35 | 0 | 5 | 35 | 45 | 30 | INJ | INJ |  | 15 | 50 | 10 | 25 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | INJ | INJ |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 22 |  | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | INJ | INJ |  | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 |  |  General overview: Given their uncertainty at quarterback and the 
              offense being installed by new HC Chip Kelly and OC Pat Shurmur, 
              the Eagles are the NFC East’s version of the Jets – 
              only with a lot more talent. It is my belief that like his final 
              years at the University of Oregon, Kelly’s offense will operate 
              at a breakneck pace. In turn, Philadelphia will find itself in a 
              number of high-scoring games in part because it is has the personnel 
              to execute Kelly’s offense and in part because the defense 
              lacks the overall depth and talent to make it stand up – particularly 
              against the pass. The Eagles should be the rare team that gives 
              both of its top two backs enough touches to make them both weekly 
              starting options in fantasy. Although I think Vick is the better 
              fit for Kelly’s offense, I decided to name Foles the starter 
              for this round of projections primarily because he figures to do 
              a better job of taking care of the football and is a more accurate 
              passer. Jackson and Maclin should both remain fantasy WR3 options 
              – albeit inconsistent ones – although both should have 
              some opportunity to supplement their numbers a bit should Kelly 
              decided to use them on running plays out of the shotgun formation, 
              such as fly sweeps. The biggest change, however, might come at tight 
              end where Celek has been an anchor for several years. In Kelly’s 
              offense, it is highly likely he will be used mostly as a blocker 
              while Casey and Ertz attempt to make some noise down the field in 
              the seams of the defense.
 Matchup analysis: Kelly’s insistence to let the quarterback 
                battle play out well into camp will make the projections for all 
                of the Eagles’ players very fluid. Foles, Vick and Matt 
                Barkley each require a different kind of offense in order to succeed, 
                which obviously makes projecting the Eagles now an exercise in 
                futility. What we do know is that Philadelphia will face a lot 
                of defenses early with excellent edge pass rushers. Assuming LT 
                Jason Peters can make it all the way back from two Achilles’ 
                tendon tears, the Eagles will have the athleticism to handle them 
                after their selection of Lane Johnson in the draft. The passing 
                game figures to get tested against Denver, Tampa Bay and Dallas 
                before the break and Minnesota and Chicago after it, making the 
                quarterback, Maclin and Jackson poor bets in the fantasy playoffs. 
                Kelly will likely waste little time leaving his mark on the NFL 
                and his running game will have an opportunity to do just that 
                early on. Washington’s run-heavy offense might limit its 
                touches, Denver’s explosive offense could force the offense 
                into comeback mode early on and Tampa Bay’s defense could 
                be good enough to stop the rushing attack regardless, but the 
                Eagles have a run-friendly schedule for the most part before the 
                bye. As of this moment, it is my opinion that defenses will have 
                a very hard time adjusting to Kelly’s approach and that 
                it will be teams like Washington and Minnesota – offenses 
                that run the ball particularly well in order to give their defenses 
                a breather – that will do the best job of limiting the number 
                of possessions Philadelphia can manage and the number of plays 
                it can run.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Washington Redskins |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | PHI | GB | DET | OAK | bye | DAL | CHI | DEN | SD | MIN | PHI | SF | NYG | KC | ATL | DAL |  
 | QB | Robert Griffin III | 23 | 23.6 | 23.6 | 329.9 | 329.9 | 3335 |  | 265 | 255 | 305 | 170 |  | 250 | 175 | 195 | INJ | 260 | 200 | 215 | 285 | 160 | 330 | 270 |  
 |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 21 |  | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | INJ | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 |  
 |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 8 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | INJ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 505 |  | 30 | 40 | 55 | 25 |  | 40 | 60 | 25 | INJ | 55 | 25 | 15 | 55 | 20 | 35 | 25 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | INJ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | QB | Kirk Cousins | 25 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 22.5 | 22.5 | 400 |  |  |  |  | 65 |  |  |  | 70 | 265 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 | 0 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 | 5 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 | 0 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Alfred Morris | 24 | 16.4 | 15.5 | 246 | 233 | 1400 |  | 105 | 85 | 90 | 120 |  | 115 | 70 | 90 | 125 | 65 | 45 | 75 | 105 | 120 | 80 | 110 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 14 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 90 |  | 5 | 0 | 10 | 0 |  | 0 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 15 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 13 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Chris Thompson | 22 | 4.5 | 2.6 | 67 | 39 | 190 |  | 15 | 0 | 10 | 25 |  | 5 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 35 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 15 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 200 |  | 5 | 15 | 15 | 0 |  | 10 | 5 | 35 | 5 | 15 | 25 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 45 | 0 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 28 |  | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 |  | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Pierre Garcon | 27 | 15.8 | 10.9 | 205 | 142 | 1000 |  | 85 | 70 | 115 | 80 |  | 65 | 55 | 30 | 70 | INJ | INJ | 70 | 110 | 90 | 125 | 35 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 63 |  | 5 | 4 | 7 | 6 |  | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | INJ | INJ | 6 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Santana Moss | 34 | 6.8 | 4.1 | 102.5 | 61.5 | 555 |  | 40 | 55 | 40 | 25 |  | 20 | 45 | 55 | 55 | 80 | 25 | 20 | 10 | 15 | 35 | 35 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 41 |  | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 |  | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Leonard Hankerson | 24 | 7.8 | 4.9 | 109 | 68 | 500 |  | 30 | 45 | 70 | 20 |  | 50 | 15 | 0 | 30 | 65 | INJ | 35 | 25 | 20 | 45 | 50 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 41 |  | 2 | 4 | 6 | 2 |  | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | INJ | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Josh Morgan | 28 | 3.6 | 2 | 54.5 | 30.5 | 245 |  | 20 | 0 | 15 | 10 |  | 10 | 0 | 25 | 40 | 30 | 40 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 5 | 35 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 24 |  | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Devery Henderson | 31 | 5.6 | 4.3 | 84 | 65 | 410 |  | 55 | 0 | 15 | 35 |  | 75 | 10 | 30 | 0 | 15 | 60 | 0 | 45 | 10 | 45 | 15 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 19 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | Fred Davis | 27 | 8.6 | 5.5 | 129.5 | 82.5 | 585 |  | 25 | 70 | 25 | 50 |  | 20 | 35 | 75 | 45 | 40 | 20 | 55 | 30 | 10 | 20 | 65 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 47 |  | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 |  | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | Jordan Reed | 23 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 39 | 27 | 150 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 |  | 0 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 0 | 30 | 15 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 20 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 12 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |  |  General overview: The Redskins claimed their first NFC East title 
              in ages and return many of their key fantasy players, but despite 
              all the positive reports to this point, the health of Griffin will 
              be a question mark until he is able to play multiple games without 
              incident at the same level he played at in 2012. RG3’s recovery 
              isn’t the only one of note either; Garcon elected not to have 
              surgery on the foot injury that limited him for a large part of 
              last season. With the ex-Colt on the field, Washington has a passing 
              game. Without him, they are in trouble in that area. Davis enjoyed 
              a nice three-week run following Garcon’s injury before suffering 
              his own injury, but he’s really more of a second read in a 
              passing game that is designed for RG3 to make one read and improvise. 
              It’s hard to imagine he’ll emerge as a bigger threat 
              this season following an Achilles’ injury and the Redskins’ 
              selection of Reed in April’s draft. Ironically, the one spot 
              on this Mike Shanahan-coached team that doesn’t appear to 
              have any mystery surrounding it is at the starting tailback spot. 
              Despite adding very little in the passing game, Morris left little 
              doubt he was the best runner of the group, making the identity of 
              his third-down complement (and important fantasy handcuff) the biggest 
              question in Washington’s running game. Since Shanahan loves 
              to play games at running back, don’t expect an answer for 
              at least another month.
 Matchup analysis: Washington couldn’t have asked for a 
                much more forgiving schedule against the run before the bye, although 
                Green Bay and Detroit should be at least a little better stopping 
                it than they were last season. Still, Morris has a legitimate 
                shot to be fantasy’s top back heading into the break. The 
                Redskins face a stiffer challenge after the bye with road games 
                in Denver and Minnesota as well as a home game with San Francisco, 
                but Morris should be primed for another incredible fantasy season 
                if he is able to withstand the same kind of workload he enjoyed 
                in 2012. Griffin and Garcon should also enjoy the pre-bye slate, 
                but Garcon could be in for a tough run right after the break if 
                he isn’t 100%. In successive weeks, he will see plenty of 
                Morris Claiborne/Brandon Carr, Tim Jennings/Charles Tilllman and 
                Champ Bailey/Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie. In two of the next three 
                weeks, he’ll draw what should be the improved pass defenses 
                of Minnesota and San Francisco. Griffin will remain a viable play 
                during this stretch because of his ability as a runner, but Washington 
                doesn’t have enough offensive weapons in the passing game 
                for RG3 to thrive every week. Despite facing the Niners in Week 
                12, four of the Redskins’ final five games during the fantasy 
                season are at home, which should only help an offense that has 
                reason to believe it will finish strong. The defensive back play 
                – be it at cornerback, safety or both – for each of 
                Washington’s three opponents during the fantasy playoffs 
                is questionable at best.  Suggestions, comments, about the article or 
                fantasy football in general? E-mail 
                me or follow me on Twitter. 
                
 Doug Orth has written for FF Today 
              since 2006 and appeared in USA Today’s Fantasy Football Preview 
              magazine in 2010 and 2011. He hosted USA Today’s hour-long, 
              pre-kickoff fantasy football internet chat every Sunday this past 
              season. Doug regularly appears as a fantasy football analyst on 
              Sirius XM’s “Fantasy Drive” and for 106.7 The 
              Fan (WJFK – Washington, D.C). He is also a member of the Fantasy 
              Sports Writers Association.
 |