| 
  
                
  
 A d v e r t i s e m e n t Even though Jeremy Maclin and Dennis Pitta do not reside in the 
                division we’ll cover this week, their season-ending injuries 
                started training camp off with a resounding thud. Just as the 
                coaches and general managers of the Philadelphia Eagles and Baltimore 
                Ravens must adjust to their new realities without their top receivers, 
                fantasy owners must also re-examine our new reality when it comes 
                to how it affects their teammates. Season-ending injuries at any time of the year are unfortunate. 
                However, if they are going to happen – and they will – 
                fantasy owners should be thankful for the ones that happen now 
                as opposed to Week 1 or Week 2. Maclin’s injury takes one 
                receiver away from a very deep pool of receivers while Pitta’s 
                absence will only increase the importance of landing a premier 
                tight end early. The losses of Aaron Hernandez and Pitta have 
                sapped the position of the players most likely to post near-elite 
                numbers at a more reasonable cost than Jimmy Graham or Rob Gronkowski. 
               In my AFC and NFC East 
                Projection article two weeks ago, I spoke about how one key 
                injury can create a “ripple effect” for the entire 
                team, but the ripples do not stop there. Opponents can now consistently 
                bring a safety over the top of DeSean Jackson, leave the other 
                safety in the box to help against what we believe will be a run-heavy 
                attack from new HC Chip Kelly and take their chances that Riley 
                Cooper can beat single coverage 5-8 times per game. James Casey 
                might take on a bigger role than he was going to have as a movable 
                chess piece that can get down the field while Zach Ertz may be 
                forced into duty earlier than the Eagles would have liked. Fewer 
                explosive pass plays probably means less scoring for the offense, 
                which likely means more “desperation passing” for 
                either Michael Vick or Nick Foles and more time on the field for 
                the Eagles’ defense – making the Philadelphia defense 
                more attractive for opposing players to go against in fantasy. For Baltimore, the loss of Pitta and Anquan Boldin means the 
                team lacks a proven slot option and drops Joe Flacco down several 
                pegs. The Ravens figured to lean heavily on the run this year 
                anyway, but the team will almost certainly struggle on third down 
                and in the red zone without Flacco’s favorite red-zone target. 
                Ed Dickson was already in line for an increased role before the 
                injury and will pick up a bit of Pitta’s slack while Ray 
                Rice figures to now push his career high in receptions, but even 
                the two of them combined can’t realistically expect to make 
                up for the likely 65-75 catches that Pitta probably was going 
                to collect. It is entirely possible the Ravens will see a ton 
                of blitzes as a result and – barring the emergence of an 
                unproven player like Deonte Thompson, Tommy Streeter or Tandon 
                Doss – may settle for a lot more field goals than they would 
                care to in 2013. Like Philadelphia, garbage-time passing and worn-out 
                defenses could become the norm. Fortunately, I’ll spend as much time as necessary to make 
                sure you are still the smartest person in the draft room. In two 
                weeks, the first of three Big Boards will hit the site. In the 
                meantime, let’s discuss the one geographical area – 
                the South – that didn’t get hit by an injury (let’s 
                not forget Denver C Dan Koppen). Here’s a quick refresher 
                of what each of the colors mean in each team’s projection 
                chart below:
 Red – A very difficult matchup. 
                For lower-level players, a red matchup means they should not be 
                used in fantasy that week. For a second- or third-tier player, 
                drop your expectations for them at least one grade that week (i.e. 
                from WR2 to WR3). For elite players, expect them to perform one 
                level lower than their usual status (i.e. RB1 performs like a 
                RB2). Yellow – Keep expectations 
                fairly low in this matchup. For lower-level players, a yellow 
                matchup is a borderline start at best. For a second- or third-tier 
                player, they can probably overcome the matchup if things fall 
                right. For the elite players, expect slightly better than average 
                production. White – Basically, this matchup 
                is one that could go either way. In some cases, I just don’t 
                feel like I have a good feel yet for this defense. Generally speaking, 
                these matchups are winnable matchups for all levels of players. Green – It doesn’t 
                get much better than this. For non-elite players, the stage is 
                basically set for said player to exploit the matchup. For the 
                elite player, this matchup should produce special numbers. Here are some final notes to help you understand what you see 
                below in the tables: 
 Notes:
 
 
                The gray highlight in each team’s schedule reflects 
                  a road game and the numbers above them correspond to the weeks 
                  of the season.
 
These are my initial projections and therefore subject 
                  to change. In a few cases, the changes will be dramatic. Changes 
                  may come in the form of a different-colored matchup and/or a 
                  player’s “game log”. In some cases, a strong 
                  preseason may warrant the inclusion of one name in a team projection 
                  and the removal of another.
 
For all those readers whose eyes gravitate immediately 
                  to the player’s final numbers: they are 15-game totals 
                  because most fantasy seasons have a Week 16 title game. Additionally, 
                  players with fewer than 10 projected catches or 100 projected 
                  yards have been removed, which will explain the discrepancy 
                  in some of the quarterback’s final numbers.
 
The age you see by each player will be that player’s 
                  age as of September 1, 2013. 
  Key to the table below: PPR Aver - Points 
                per game in full-point PPR leagues where all touchdowns are worth 
                six points.NPPR Aver - Points per game in non-PPR 
                leagues where all touchdowns are worth six points.
 PPR - Total points scored in PPR
 Non-PPR - Total points scored in 
                non-PPR.
 
 AFC South
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Houston Texans |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | SD | TEN | BAL | SEA | SF | STL | KC | bye | IND | ARI | OAK | JAC | NE | JAC | IND | DEN |  
 | QB | Matt Schaub | 32 | 19 | 19 | 285.4 | 285.4 | 3960 |  | 265 | 245 | 300 | 210 | 255 | 255 | 165 |  | 310 | 245 | 255 | 305 | 280 | 255 | 335 | 280 |  
 |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 25 |  | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 |  | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |  
 |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 12 |  | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  
 |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 10 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Arian Foster | 27 | 21 | 17.5 | 315 | 263 | 1260 |  | 70 | 105 | 75 | 45 | 70 | 85 | 110 |  | 105 | 70 | 115 | 75 | 85 | 110 | 75 | 65 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 13 |  | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 410 |  | 15 | 15 | 30 | 15 | 25 | 50 | 10 |  | 25 | 35 | 5 | 35 | 40 | 10 | 60 | 40 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 52 |  | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 |  | 4 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 5 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Ben Tate | 25 | 8.2 | 7.6 | 114.5 | 106.5 | 660 |  | 45 | 55 | 40 | 30 | 25 | 45 | 60 |  | 55 | 40 | 85 | 20 | INJ | 60 | 55 | 45 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 45 |  | 5 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 |  | 10 | 0 | 0 | 5 | INJ | 0 | 5 | 0 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 8 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | INJ | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Andre Johnson | 32 | 18 | 12 | 270 | 180 | 1320 |  | 90 | 110 | 105 | 55 | 85 | 70 | 65 |  | 115 | 55 | 90 | 150 | 75 | 115 | 85 | 55 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 8 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 90 |  | 7 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 4 |  | 8 | 4 | 5 | 10 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | DeAndre Hopkins | 21 | 12.2 | 8.2 | 182.5 | 123.5 | 875 |  | 50 | 55 | 65 | 70 | 60 | 35 | 55 |  | 75 | 85 | 40 | 85 | 45 | 70 | 45 | 40 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 59 |  | 3 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 4 |  | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Lestar Jean | 25 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 21.5 | 13.5 | 135 |  | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 |  | 25 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 30 | 15 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 8 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Keshawn Martin | 23 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 33.5 | 16.5 | 165 |  | 25 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 5 |  | 10 | 0 | 25 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 30 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 17 |  | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | Owen Daniels | 30 | 10.7 | 6.8 | 160.5 | 101.5 | 655 |  | 50 | 40 | 60 | 40 | 55 | 50 | 20 |  | 40 | 35 | 55 | 15 | 35 | 35 | 55 | 70 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 59 |  | 5 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 2 |  | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 6 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | Garrett Graham | 27 | 5.3 | 3.1 | 80 | 47 | 350 |  | 20 | 10 | 30 | 15 | 25 | 20 | 10 |  | 10 | 35 | 20 | 10 | 50 | 25 | 40 | 30 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 33 |  | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |  | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 3 |  |  General overview: Two important upgrades 
              – including one that was already on the team – highlight 
              why the Texans are in a good position to make a Super Bowl run. 
              Hopkins represents the first real investment the team has made at 
              receiver since drafting Johnson in 2003 while Tate is trying to 
              put his injury-riddled 2012 season behind him. The upside two both 
              players is obvious: Hopkins’ ability to create big plays should 
              reduce the amount of attention Johnson sees all over the field – 
              particularly in the red zone – while Tate will allow for little 
              to no drop-off in the running game when Foster needs to rest. As 
              for the rest of the Houston offense, much will remain the same in 
              terms of philosophy. The Texans’ coaches have already said 
              they don’t want Foster setting another career in carries (351 
              in 2012), but he’s a safe bet for 300 and will have the offense 
              go through him just about every week. Tate should a regular dose 
              of 8-10 touches per week plus significant action in any blowout. 
              Schaub has evolved into a caretaker quarterback in recent years 
              given the success of Foster, but that likely had to do as much with 
              the absence of another viable receiving threat opposite Johnson 
              than anything else. Daniels might see fewer targets with Hopkins 
              around, but his value shouldn’t dip all that much because 
              he is a trusted red-zone option.
 Matchup analysis: The Texans’ 
                ability to navigate through their schedule in 2013 will depend 
                largely on the improvement the right side of the offensive line 
                has made. If they approach anything close to the level they played 
                at in 2011, then even Seattle and San Francisco don’t pose 
                a great threat even though those defenses will probably do the 
                best job of keeping the running game in check. Between the Chargers, 
                Ravens, Seahawks and Niners (perhaps even the Rams), the first-half 
                schedule is littered with teams capable of limiting the effectiveness 
                of a struggling right side. The post-bye slate is much more forgiving 
                in that only the Patriots and Broncos (and maybe the Cardinals) 
                figure to have the personnel to bottle up Foster and/or Tate. 
                IF the Texans decided to open up the passing game a bit, however, 
                Schaub could easily enjoy his best year since 2009. While Houston’s 
                passing game could have some issues in the four games leading 
                into the bye, most of the teams before and after that stretch 
                are either breaking new (or young) corners, have questionable 
                safety play or possess some the least-talented defensive backs 
                in the league. After the Texans’ Week 4-7 stretch, it is 
                conceivable that Denver is the only opponent of slowing down Johnson, 
                Hopkins and Daniels. In short, if any of the three main pass-catchers 
                has a poor season, it is unlikely to be because of the quality 
                of their opponents.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Indianapolis Colts |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | OAK | MIA | SF | JAC | SEA | SD | DEN | bye | HOU | STL | TEN | ARI | TEN | CIN | HOU | KC |  
 | QB | Andrew Luck | 23 | 22.4 | 22.4 | 336.7 | 336.7 | 4280 |  | 290 | 315 | 255 | 320 | 250 | 320 | 230 |  | 275 | 255 | 300 | 290 | 365 | 245 | 290 | 280 |  
 |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 25 |  | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 |  | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 |  
 |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 13 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |  
 |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 235 |  | 15 | 30 | 5 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 15 |  | 5 | 35 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 25 | 15 | 15 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Ahmad Bradshaw | 27 | 14 | 11 | 168.5 | 131.5 | 625 |  | 60 | 45 | 25 | INJ | 50 | 60 | 35 |  | 45 | 80 | 55 | 20 | INJ | INJ | 65 | 85 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 1 | 1 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 270 |  | 20 | 40 | 15 | INJ | 20 | 15 | 5 |  | 40 | 25 | 45 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 25 | 20 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 37 |  | 3 | 5 | 3 | INJ | 4 | 2 | 1 |  | 4 | 3 | 5 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 4 | 3 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Vick Ballard | 23 | 9.8 | 8.2 | 147.5 | 122.5 | 770 |  | 45 | 40 | 50 | 80 | 35 | 45 | 55 |  | 60 | 50 | 35 | 65 | 50 | 85 | 30 | 45 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 155 |  | 10 | 5 | 15 | 25 | 0 | 10 | 15 |  | 5 | 10 | 0 | 25 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 10 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 25 |  | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Reggie Wayne | 34 | 14.2 | 8.9 | 212.5 | 133.5 | 975 |  | 75 | 80 | 55 | 105 | 40 | 75 | 45 |  | 30 | 55 | 70 | 35 | 130 | 65 | 50 | 65 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 79 |  | 5 | 7 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 4 |  | 2 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 5 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | D 
                          Heyward-Bey | 26 | 11.8 | 7.8 | 165 | 109 | 790 |  | 80 | 35 | 65 | 70 | 25 | 60 | 30 |  | 65 | INJ | 50 | 85 | 65 | 30 | 75 | 55 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | INJ | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 56 |  | 4 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 2 |  | 5 | INJ | 3 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | T.Y. Hilton | 23 | 10.5 | 7.3 | 157 | 109 | 790 |  | 40 | 70 | 30 | 45 | 85 | 70 | 15 |  | 40 | 85 | 25 | 50 | 40 | 60 | 65 | 70 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 48 |  | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 2 |  | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | Coby Fleener | 24 | 9.8 | 6.5 | 137.5 | 91.5 | 675 |  | 45 | 40 | 50 | 30 | 45 | 55 | 75 |  | 30 | 65 | 45 | 60 | 55 | 35 | 45 | INJ |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | INJ |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 46 |  | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 5 |  | 2 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | INJ |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | Dwayne Allen | 23 | 8.1 | 5.1 | 122 | 76 | 520 |  | 20 | 45 | 25 | 40 | 35 | 20 | 45 |  | 55 | 15 | 30 | 25 | 45 | 45 | 25 | 50 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 46 |  | 2 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 5 |  | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 |  |  General overview: Luck easily lived 
              up to his hype as a rookie and the Colts added to the optimism by 
              adding Bradshaw and Heyward-Bey in the offseason. Both one-year 
              deals are of the low-risk, high-reward variety; Bradshaw should 
              be the pass-catching complement to Ballard – at the very least 
              – while Heyward-Bey gets a chance to play for a good team 
              where he is a clear secondary option and can learn the finer points 
              of the game from a veteran like Wayne. The biggest transition this 
              season, though, may be the move from former OC Bruce Arians’ 
              vertical-based offense to Pep Hamilton’s West Coast attack, 
              although the new play-caller has promised to carry over certain 
              parts of Arians’ playbook as well; he will also have the added 
              benefit of being familiar with Luck and Fleener from their days 
              together at Stanford. While there will be more emphasis placed on 
              a physical running game under Hamilton, Luck will remain the unquestioned 
              centerpiece of the offense. Wayne turned in his fourth career 100-catch 
              season in 2012 during his age-34 season, but the fact that he will 
              turn 35 in November may have given the team enough of a reason to 
              begin the shift in offensive philosophy this season. Fleener should 
              help make up for any drop-off from Wayne, as Hamilton will almost 
              certainly use him more in space than Arians did.
 Matchup analysis: There is potential 
                for significant peaks and valleys for the passing game, particularly 
                if Wayne starts to feel his age a bit this season. The Colts face 
                the top two NFC West defenses, Denver and Miami over the first 
                seven weeks, all of which should be able to generate a significant 
                pass rush and play a bit of coverage as well. Houston and St. 
                Louis represent two of the best defenses Indianapolis will face 
                over the second half of the schedule before the fantasy postseason, 
                although the fantasy playoff slate could be the most challenging 
                multi-week stretch of the season for Wayne & Co. if the Bengals, 
                Texans and Chiefs are all healthy at that point. As dominant as 
                the receivers should be in the first half, the tight ends could 
                easily take over in the second half. As a result, both Allen and 
                Fleener could (and probably should) be midseason trade targets 
                in fantasy. The emphasis on the running game is a noble one in 
                theory, but did the Colts do enough up front to succeed against 
                10 opponents (during the fantasy schedule) who finished in the 
                top half of rush defense – in terms of YPC – last 
                season? Bradshaw and Ballard face a number of those teams over 
                the first nine weeks of the season, making them possible fantasy 
                trade-deadline targets as well.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Jacksonville Jaguars |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | KC | OAK | SEA | IND | STL | DEN | SD | SF | bye | TEN | ARI | HOU | CLE | HOU | BUF | TEN |  
 | QB | Chad Henne | 28 | 15.3 | 15.3 | 230.1 | 230.1 | 3440 |  | 230 | 275 | 130 | 275 | 260 | 145 | 245 | 195 |  | 310 | 210 | 185 | 260 | 225 | 230 | 265 |  
 |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 19 |  | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 |  
 |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 15 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  
 |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 85 |  | 10 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 10 |  | 5 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | QB | Blaine Gabbert | 23 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 10.6 | 10.6 | 165 |  |  |  | 75 |  |  | 65 |  | 25 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  | 1 |  | 0 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  | 1 |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 20 |  |  |  | 5 |  |  | 10 |  | 5 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  | 0 |  |  | 0 |  | 0 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | M 
                          Jones-Drew | 28 | 14.6 | 11.8 | 219.5 | 176.5 | 1035 |  | 70 | 90 | 55 | 80 | 60 | 40 | 70 | 45 |  | 80 | 55 | 65 | 75 | 85 | 55 | 110 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 310 |  | 15 | 25 | 40 | 15 | 30 | 30 | 10 | 15 |  | 20 | 15 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 35 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 43 |  | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 3 |  | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Justin Forsett | 27 | 2.2 | 1.6 | 32.5 | 23.5 | 165 |  | 15 | 20 | 10 | 15 | 5 | 15 | 10 | 0 |  | 25 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 10 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 70 |  | 5 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 10 |  | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 0 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 9 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Denard Robinson | 22 | 4.6 | 3.5 | 68.5 | 52.5 | 240 |  | 10 | 35 | 5 | 45 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 15 |  | 0 | 15 | 20 | 0 | 15 | 40 | 25 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 165 |  | 15 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 10 | 5 |  | 25 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 30 | 0 | 5 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 16 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Cecil Shorts | 25 | 13.9 | 9.3 | 209 | 140 | 1040 |  | 75 | 100 | 60 | 90 | 85 | 40 | 75 | 70 |  | 110 | 40 | 30 | 50 | 65 | 45 | 105 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 69 |  | 5 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 5 |  | 7 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 6 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Justin Blackmon | 23 | 13.5 | 8.4 | 149 | 92 | 680 |  | SUS | SUS | SUS | SUS | 40 | 70 | 45 | 65 |  | 80 | 90 | 55 | 75 | 40 | 55 | 65 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | SUS | SUS | SUS | SUS | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 57 |  | SUS | SUS | SUS | SUS | 4 | 6 | 3 | 6 |  | 7 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 5 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Jordan Shipley | 27 | 3.3 | 1.6 | 40 | 19 | 190 |  | 30 | 15 | 15 | 45 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 0 |  | 0 | 40 | 5 | 15 | INJ | INJ | INJ |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 21 |  | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |  | 0 | 4 | 1 | 2 | INJ | INJ | INJ |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Ace Sanders | 21 | 2.6 | 1.5 | 39 | 23 | 170 |  | 15 | 0 | 10 | 30 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 |  | 0 | 0 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 35 | 10 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 16 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | M 
                          Massaquoi | 26 | 4 | 2.6 | 60.5 | 38.5 | 325 |  | 35 | 55 | 25 | 55 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 |  | 10 | 0 | 20 | 45 | 35 | 15 | 0 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 22 |  | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | Marcedes Lewis | 29 | 11.2 | 7.2 | 168.5 | 107.5 | 655 |  | 40 | 55 | 45 | 35 | 60 | 60 | 55 | 45 |  | 65 | 20 | 35 | 30 | 20 | 45 | 45 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 61 |  | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 |  | 6 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 5 |  |  General overview: Ex-HC Mike Mularkey 
              had little chance to leave his mark in his one year with the Jaguars, 
              especially after Jones-Drew was lost for the season after only six 
              games. Mularkey was let go and former Seattle Seahawks DC Gus Bradley 
              was chosen to replace him. As first-time head coaches typically 
              do, Bradley opted for a familiar face in OC Jedd Fisch, who worked 
              with him as an assistant on the Seahawks’ staff a few years 
              ago. While the offensive outlook appears bleak with Gabbert and 
              Henne fighting for the right to start under center, Jacksonville 
              has quietly assembled a fair amount of skill-position talent that 
              could thrive in Fisch’s up-tempo offense. Shorts went from 
              a raw rookie in 2011 to a polished receiver last season and could 
              be the latest in a growing line of receivers to take advantage of 
              spending part of his summer training with Larry Fitzgerald. Blackmon 
              did himself no favors by landing a four-game suspension for violating 
              the league’s substance-abuse policy, which will give Massaquoi 
              a chance to shine in September. Lewis has shown he can be an asset 
              in the red zone and is coming off a 50-catch season. Robinson is 
              listed as a running back, but will almost certainly be used in his 
              preferred “offensive weapon” position as one of Fisch’s 
              more versatile chess pieces. However, the offense will go only as 
              far as Jones-Drew can take it, assuming his career workload doesn’t 
              catch up to him in 2013.
 Matchup analysis: 
                It is conceivable that MJD has one more banner season – 
                in a contract year no less – but he’s not going to 
                catch a lot of breaks against a rather unforgiving run schedule. 
                The team added highly-regarded LT Luke Joeckel (who will play 
                on the right side in 2013) in the draft, but did little to improve 
                the interior of the line, where Jones-Drew typically does the 
                majority of his damage. Furthermore, the Jags may get off to a 
                slow start running the ball regardless as they will be attempting 
                to become one of a growing number of teams to embrace the zone-blocking 
                scheme. The second half of the schedule looks more manageable 
                for MJD, Forsett and possibly even Robinson with three straight 
                home games to close out the fantasy season, but all three opponents 
                should be better stopping the run than they were last season. 
                Those teams (Houston, Buffalo and Tennessee) could also put together 
                enough offense to force the Jags to abandon their running game 
                early in the second half as well. Shorts has a treacherous slate 
                to navigate, with many of his snaps coming against the likes of 
                Brandon Flowers, Richard Sherman, Champ Bailey, Patrick Peterson, 
                Johnathan Joseph (twice) and Stephon Gilmore. Blackmon probably 
                won’t draw near the attention Shorts will and, as a result, 
                could be a fantasy playoff stud if the new staff can get him to 
                maximize his potential. Lewis should have an easier path to success 
                than his receiver brethren and could emerge as a valuable contributor 
                for the first time since 2010 assuming Henne wins the job, but 
                only time will tell if Bradley and Fisch come to the same conclusion 
                most fantasy owners have already reached about what quarterback 
                should be starting.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Tennessee Titans |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | PIT | HOU | SD | NYJ | KC | SEA | SF | bye | STL | JAC | IND | OAK | IND | DEN | ARI | JAC |  
 | QB | Jake Locker | 25 | 16.5 | 16.5 | 247.3 | 247.3 | 3370 |  | 230 | 215 | 260 | 185 | 260 | 105 | 125 |  | 250 | 315 | 305 | 250 | 265 | 90 | 240 | 275 |  
 |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 17 |  | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |  
 |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 15 |  | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 285 |  | 15 | 25 | 25 | 15 | 20 | 10 | 15 |  | 40 | 10 | 15 | 5 | 20 | 35 | 15 | 20 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | QB | Ryan Fitzpatrick | 30 | 9 | 9 | 27 | 27 | 300 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 65 | 65 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 170 |  |  |  
 |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 | 0 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  
 |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  
 |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 10 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 | 5 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  |  |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 | 0 |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Chris Johnson | 27 | 17.3 | 13.9 | 260 | 209 | 1265 |  | 65 | 75 | 90 | 105 | 125 | 35 | 50 |  | 75 | 65 | 100 | 150 | 70 | 65 | 85 | 110 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 405 |  | 30 | 15 | 20 | 40 | 15 | 15 | 10 |  | 45 | 35 | 25 | 20 | 55 | 35 | 25 | 20 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 51 |  | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 |  | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 3 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Shonn Greene | 28 | 6.2 | 5.9 | 93.5 | 88.5 | 485 |  | 20 | 30 | 35 | 20 | 45 | 45 | 20 |  | 15 | 50 | 40 | 65 | 25 | 15 | 35 | 25 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 40 |  | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 |  | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Kenny Britt | 24 | 12.8 | 8.8 | 192.5 | 131.5 | 955 |  | 65 | 40 | 90 | 15 | 75 | 25 | 55 |  | 70 | 125 | 130 | 70 | 40 | 55 | 35 | 65 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 61 |  | 5 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 4 |  | 5 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Nate Washington | 30 | 7.5 | 4.8 | 112.5 | 72.5 | 545 |  | 40 | 75 | 35 | 20 | 45 | 10 | 35 |  | 45 | 55 | 40 | 25 | 45 | 10 | 45 | 20 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 40 |  | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 |  | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Kendall Wright | 23 | 11.1 | 7.4 | 166.5 | 110.5 | 805 |  | 55 | 45 | 75 | 55 | 80 | 30 | 35 |  | 15 | 75 | 55 | 105 | 25 | 40 | 70 | 45 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 56 |  | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 |  | 2 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Justin Hunter | 22 | 4.4 | 3 | 57.5 | 39.5 | 275 |  | 15 | 0 | 20 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 10 |  | 15 | INJ | 15 | INJ | 35 | 45 | 25 | 60 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | INJ | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 18 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | INJ | 1 | INJ | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Damian Williams | 25 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 28 | 14 | 140 |  | 0 | 20 | 0 | 10 | 15 | 35 | 20 |  | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 14 |  | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | Delanie Walker | 29 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 67.5 | 37.5 | 255 |  | 15 | 20 | 10 | 0 | 30 | 20 | 15 |  | 15 | 10 | 20 | 20 | 10 | 40 | 15 | 15 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 30 |  | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 |  | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | Taylor Thompson | 23 | 3.6 | 2.1 | 54 | 31 | 250 |  | 10 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 25 | 10 |  | 35 | 10 | 20 | 10 | 30 | 10 | 25 | 50 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 23 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |  |  General overview: Perhaps no team 
              upgraded their offensive line in the offseason more than the Titans. 
              LT Michael Roos and RT David Stewart held up fine for the most part 
              in 2012, but the interior of the line was among the worst in football. 
              As has become the norm, Johnson was once again slammed for his lack 
              of consistency and bore the brunt of the shoddy blocking. As a result, 
              Tennessee landed the best guard on the free-agent market in Andy 
              Levitre, drafted Chance Warmack to play on the right side and grabbed 
              a center in Brian Schwenke who could give Fernando Velasco a run 
              for his money at the pivot. All of this was necessary in order to 
              fix an offense that wants to get back to running the football like 
              it did in Johnson’s early years. The Titans also didn’t 
              stop with the line, signing ex-Jet Greene to take the goal-line 
              work and free up Johnson to do more in the passing game. The offensive 
              line shift was also necessary to give Locker every chance to succeed. 
              Freed from the mind-boggling conservative play-calling of ex-OC 
              Chris Palmer, OC Dowell Loggains anticipates using the running game 
              and a talented group of receivers – all of which have deep-ball 
              abilities – to accentuate the arm strength and athleticism 
              of his third-year signal-caller. Wright dropped nearly 15 pounds 
              while Britt had a quiet and healthy offseason, which is important 
              if Tennessee has any hopes of allowing Locker to succeed long-term.
 Matchup analysis: Unless the rebuilt 
                offensive line quickly establishes itself as one of the league’s 
                most dominant units, it is highly likely that critics of Johnson 
                (and his inconsistency in fantasy) will have plenty to chirp about 
                through the first 9-10 weeks of the season. It is during this 
                time that it will be important that Johnson is playing a key role 
                in the passing game if he has any hope to prove them wrong. And 
                while part of Greene’s new role will be to keep CJ2K fresh, 
                it isn’t as if Johnson’s speed or Greene’s power 
                figure to be all that effective against the Steelers, Texans, 
                Chargers or the three NFC West teams they will face from Week 
                6-9. Starting in Week 10, however, Johnson and Greene could pay 
                off in a big way behind an offensive line that will have worked 
                out most of its timing issues, increasing the chances both of 
                Tennessee’s backs will be solid fantasy trade-deadline options. 
                The same can basically be said about Locker & Co., but a slow 
                start against a brutal schedule could end up getting him benched 
                – if he doesn’t get injured first. If Locker has any 
                degree of fantasy success against his early opponents, it might 
                be because he is a solid bet to rush for 20-40 yards per game. 
                Britt, like Johnson, is a matchup nightmare that has the talent 
                to put up strong fantasy numbers against any opponent. If he can 
                flash 2010 or early 2011 form in September, the team’s other 
                receivers (Washington, Wright and Hunter) all have enough talent 
                to post huge games against single coverage. But for this offense 
                to maximize its potential, Johnson has to draw up the extra defender, 
                Locker has to be accurate enough to make the defense pay for it 
                and Britt has to stay healthy.
 NFC South
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Atlanta Falcons |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | NO | STL | MIA | NE | NYJ |  | TB | ARI | CAR | SEA | TB | NO | BUF | GB | WAS | SF |  
 | QB | Matt Ryan | 28 | 24.3 | 24.3 | 364.5 | 364.5 | 4300 |  | 325 | 285 | 250 | 295 | 275 |  | 225 | 295 | 255 | 235 | 275 | 335 | 275 | 340 | 305 | 330 |  
 |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 33 |  | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 |  | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 |  
 |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 12 |  | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 125 |  | 5 | 10 | 20 | 0 | 0 |  | 10 | 5 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 15 | 5 | 15 | 10 | 5 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Steven Jackson | 30 | 20.3 | 16.2 | 304 | 243 | 1170 |  | 80 | 115 | 65 | 75 | 90 |  | 55 | 80 | 105 | 65 | 40 | 100 | 75 | 85 | 65 | 75 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 12 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |  | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 420 |  | 35 | 40 | 20 | 35 | 35 |  | 20 | 50 | 25 | 15 | 10 | 30 | 20 | 45 | 20 | 20 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 61 |  | 6 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 |  | 4 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 3 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Jacquizz Rodgers | 24 | 4.7 | 3.4 | 70.5 | 50.5 | 300 |  | 15 | 20 | 20 | 15 | 40 |  | 20 | 10 | 35 | 10 | 15 | 15 | 10 | 30 | 30 | 15 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 145 |  | 10 | 10 | 20 | 10 | 0 |  | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 15 | 15 | 10 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 20 |  | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 |  | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Roddy White | 31 | 17.7 | 11.7 | 265.5 | 175.5 | 1215 |  | 90 | 70 | 110 | 70 | 85 |  | 75 | 45 | 75 | 55 | 70 | 120 | 55 | 100 | 110 | 85 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 9 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 90 |  | 7 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 7 |  | 6 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 6 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Julio Jones | 24 | 19.2 | 13.2 | 287.5 | 198.5 | 1265 |  | 105 | 75 | 65 | 90 | 45 |  | 40 | 115 | 80 | 65 | 85 | 100 | 125 | 65 | 90 | 120 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 12 |  | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 89 |  | 6 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 3 |  | 4 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 8 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Harry Douglas | 28 | 4.1 | 2.3 | 61 | 35 | 290 |  | 25 | 10 | 0 | 30 | 20 |  | 35 | 10 | 0 | 25 | 40 | 0 | 20 | 35 | 10 | 30 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 26 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | Tony Gonzalez | 37 | 14.9 | 9.4 | 223.5 | 141.5 | 875 |  | 60 | 65 | 35 | 55 | 80 |  | 35 | 65 | 50 | 75 | 45 | 70 | 45 | 70 | 60 | 65 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 9 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 82 |  | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 7 |  | 4 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 7 |  |  General overview: The mere fact that 
              Michael Turner did not hold this offense back in 2012 means the 
              Falcons’ offense could be destined for great things in 2013. 
              As such, the one piece that could push Atlanta over the top in the 
              NFC is the addition of Jackson, who is a perfect fit for this passing 
              offense because he is such an adept receiver and can also supply 
              the same kind of power that Turner did. Although the ex-Ram doesn’t 
              possess the same frightening size-speed combination he did in his 
              prime, it is entirely possible the plethora of consistent 6-7 man 
              boxes he will see will enable him to post the second-best fantasy 
              season of his career in his age-30 season. Perhaps spurred somewhat 
              by Jackson’s signing, Gonzalez delayed retirement to take 
              one more stab at a Super Bowl. And it is hard to blame him: Ryan 
              has done nothing but improve in each of his five seasons, White 
              still appears to be in his prime and Jones is quickly emerging into 
              one of the elite receiving talents in the NFL, meaning Gonzalez 
              could make another run at 80-90 catches and 10 touchdowns at age 
              37. Even with a couple of older parts in the machine, no team may 
              field more talent at the skill positions this season than Atlanta.
 Matchup analysis: In Jackson, the 
                passing game adds an element out of the backfield that it did 
                not have last season, which will come in handy as the Falcons 
                face a number of potentially good secondaries from the NFC West, 
                AFC East and in their own division (Tampa Bay). But even as good 
                as each of those opponents have it in their back four, only Seattle 
                and perhaps Tampa Bay have the talent and depth necessary to keep 
                Jones, White and Gonzalez somewhat in check…and that is 
                where Jackson’s abilities as a receiver should really make 
                a difference. Because so few teams have two above-average cornerbacks, 
                defenses that have a “shadow” cornerback will have 
                to pick their poison between Jones and White, with the likelihood 
                being that coordinators will simply try to take away the “hot” 
                receiver when there isn’t a clear size-speed matchup. Gonzalez 
                is sure to have some down weeks – if only because the receivers 
                could dominate their fair share of games – but with safeties 
                so preoccupied with the receivers, linebackers will see a lot 
                of time against him. Jackson himself admitted he may not be doing 
                a lot of running early in games this season, but there is little 
                doubt he will be converting his share of goal-line scores to make 
                up for it. Despite his age and the likelihood he might not see 
                300 carries, Jackson may be one of the few matchup-proof backs 
                in fantasy in 2013.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Carolina Panthers |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | SEA | BUF | NYG | bye | ARI | MIN | STL | TB | ATL | SF | NE | MIA | TB | NO | NYJ | NO |  
 | QB | Cam Newton | 24 | 24.3 | 24.3 | 364 | 364 | 3875 |  | 210 | 265 | 315 |  | 310 | 275 | 265 | 185 | 265 | 230 | 270 | 305 | 195 | 330 | 190 | 265 |  
 |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 20 |  | 0 | 2 | 2 |  | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 |  
 |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 13 |  | 1 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 670 |  | 40 | 80 | 25 |  | 50 | 25 | 60 | 20 | 60 | 40 | 20 | 35 | 45 | 55 | 45 | 70 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 8 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | DeAngelo Williams | 30 | 6.1 | 5.3 | 92 | 80 | 520 |  | 35 | 35 | 60 |  | 20 | 15 | 35 | 10 | 55 | 25 | 25 | 35 | 20 | 35 | 25 | 90 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 100 |  | 10 | 5 | 20 |  | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 20 | 0 | 10 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 12 |  | 1 | 1 | 2 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Jonathan Stewart | 26 | 12 | 9.5 | 168.5 | 133.5 | 725 |  | INJ | 40 | 50 |  | 75 | 60 | 65 | 45 | 35 | 50 | 65 | 40 | 30 | 55 | 80 | 35 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | INJ | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 250 |  | INJ | 10 | 15 |  | 15 | 30 | 20 | 10 | 40 | 5 | 20 | 25 | 10 | 30 | 5 | 15 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | INJ | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 35 |  | INJ | 1 | 2 |  | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Mike Tolbert | 27 | 4.4 | 2.9 | 66 | 43 | 90 |  | 15 | 5 | 0 |  | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 5 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 160 |  | 10 | 15 | 30 |  | 5 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 15 | 0 | 15 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 23 |  | 1 | 2 | 4 |  | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Steve Smith | 34 | 15.6 | 10.7 | 234 | 161 | 1130 |  | 55 | 80 | 90 |  | 115 | 85 | 70 | 30 | 85 | 55 | 80 | 120 | 50 | 105 | 35 | 75 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 8 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 73 |  | 4 | 5 | 7 |  | 5 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Brandon LaFell | 26 | 8.5 | 5.5 | 128 | 82 | 640 |  | 35 | 75 | 30 |  | 55 | 45 | 30 | 70 | 35 | 40 | 35 | 55 | 20 | 60 | 15 | 40 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 46 |  | 2 | 5 | 3 |  | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Domenik Hixon | 28 | 8.1 | 4.8 | 97 | 57 | 450 |  | 30 | 25 | 45 |  | 40 | 25 | 65 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 45 | 30 | 50 | 20 | 35 | 40 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 40 |  | 3 | 2 | 4 |  | 3 | 2 | 5 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 4 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Ted 
                          Ginn Jr. | 28 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 42 | 22 | 220 |  | 15 | 0 | 10 |  | 15 | 35 | 0 | 20 | 30 | 15 | 0 | 5 | 20 | 15 | 30 | 10 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 20 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Armanti Edwards | 25 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 42 | 22 | 220 |  | 20 | 0 | 5 |  | 10 | 15 | 20 | 15 | 20 | 30 | 35 | 5 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 15 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 20 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | Greg Olsen | 28 | 11 | 7.1 | 164.5 | 106.5 | 705 |  | 35 | 55 | 70 |  | 55 | 20 | 50 | 35 | 45 | 65 | 40 | 50 | 35 | 35 | 70 | 45 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 58 |  | 3 | 5 | 6 |  | 4 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 4 |  |  General overview: From the time they 
              first came into existence back in 1995, the Panthers have been known 
              primarily as a running team – something that doesn’t 
              figure to change anytime soon. To what degree they will try to pound 
              opponents into submission this season, however, depends a lot on 
              how quickly Stewart is able to return to the field. The sixth-year 
              back is still having “issues” with his right ankle following 
              offseason surgery, so while Carolina boasts impressive depth in 
              Williams and Tolbert, neither player can provide everything he does 
              in the same package. New OC Mike Shula wants to implement an up-tempo 
              offense and has gone to great lengths this offseason to make sure 
              Newton is spending less time in the huddle, but the Panthers did 
              little to upgrade his supporting cast outside of bringing in a quality 
              – yet injury-prone – third receiver in Hixon. Shula 
              has promised to stick with the same base offense that helped contribute 
              to Carolina’s 5-1 record to end last season (including four 
              straight wins to close out 2012), with the hope being that Newton 
              and Stewart can make opponents respect the run enough that Smith 
              and Olsen can exploit single coverage down the field on a regular 
              basis.
 Matchup analysis: The running game 
                will ideally be more of a two-pronged attack between Newton and 
                Stewart, although it is possible Shula’s hand might be forced 
                into a three-man committee if the latter cannot start the season. 
                Either way, there isn’t a great deal to get excited about 
                with only two favorable matchups all season – and that’s 
                assuming Saints DC Rob Ryan doesn’t drastically improve 
                the run defense – and the likelihood that Newton will command 
                about a third of the rushing yards in this offense. The news is 
                better for the passing game, where the slate is clear for LaFell 
                to have a banner year if he can hold off Hixon – which appears 
                likely at this point. Smith will have his fair share of difficult 
                matchups – such as Richard Sherman and Stephon Gilmore – 
                before the bye and Patrick Peterson, Darrelle Revis (twice) and 
                Antonio Cromartie after it, but it is not an overly daunting schedule 
                overall for a player whose diminutive size makes him a different 
                kind of matchup nightmare. With no real threat – outside 
                of Olsen – for targets, Smith could (and probably should) 
                return to 2011 fantasy form. The loss of tight end aficionado 
                OC Rob Chudzinski could mean less of a role for Olsen. The Saints 
                have enough talent at safety now to match up with him in the fantasy 
                playoffs, although his matchups the rest of the season should 
                keep his value about where it has been since he became a Panther.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | New Orleans Saints |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | ATL | TB | ARI | MIA | CHI | NE | bye | BUF | NYJ | DAL | SF | ATL | SEA | CAR | STL | CAR |  
 | QB | Drew Brees | 34 | 26.8 | 26.8 | 402.5 | 402.5 | 4850 |  | 325 | 280 | 350 | 360 | 370 | 305 |  | 335 | 315 | 390 | 270 | 225 | 320 | 350 | 330 | 325 |  
 |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 38 |  | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 |  | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 |  
 |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 15 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  
 |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 45 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 |  | 10 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 0 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Mark Ingram | 23 | 9.8 | 8.7 | 147 | 131 | 730 |  | 50 | 25 | 55 | 35 | 30 | 55 |  | 55 | 80 | 60 | 25 | 40 | 25 | 85 | 65 | 45 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 8 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 100 |  | 5 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 5 |  | 15 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 15 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 16 |  | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Pierre Thomas | 28 | 10.4 | 7.7 | 156.5 | 115.5 | 540 |  | 35 | 45 | 15 | 45 | 35 | 35 |  | 15 | 55 | 40 | 35 | 55 | 40 | 20 | 50 | 20 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 315 |  | 25 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 50 | 25 |  | 20 | 5 | 15 | 15 | 35 | 15 | 40 | 15 | 25 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 41 |  | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 |  | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Darren Sproles | 30 | 17.1 | 11.5 | 256.5 | 172.5 | 520 |  | 40 | 15 | 70 | 20 | 35 | 40 |  | 25 | 15 | 55 | 20 | 10 | 15 | 65 | 20 | 75 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 725 |  | 30 | 35 | 75 | 35 | 65 | 30 |  | 35 | 55 | 75 | 45 | 20 | 105 | 55 | 40 | 25 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 84 |  | 4 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 5 |  | 4 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 10 | 6 | 5 | 5 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Marques Colston | 30 | 15.2 | 10.1 | 227.5 | 151.5 | 975 |  | 75 | 35 | 75 | 95 | 55 | 85 |  | 85 | 30 | 50 | 75 | 45 | 35 | 110 | 75 | 50 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 9 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 76 |  | 6 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 7 |  | 6 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Lance Moore | 30 | 10.7 | 7 | 161 | 105 | 750 |  | 60 | 25 | 40 | 110 | 85 | 60 |  | 35 | 55 | 40 | 40 | 65 | 10 | 70 | 20 | 35 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 56 |  | 5 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 4 |  | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Joe Morgan | 25 | 4.9 | 3.7 | 74 | 56 | 380 |  | 25 | 30 | 50 | 0 | 10 | 5 |  | 45 | 70 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 40 | 50 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 18 |  | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Nick Toon | 24 | 2.9 | 1.5 | 43 | 23 | 230 |  | 0 | 25 | 10 | 25 | 0 | 35 |  | 30 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 10 | 25 | 20 | 15 | 10 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 20 |  | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |  | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | Jimmy Graham | 26 | 18.6 | 12.4 | 278.5 | 185.5 | 1135 |  | 85 | 70 | 75 | 50 | 105 | 40 |  | 70 | 90 | 140 | 65 | 45 | 70 | 55 | 90 | 85 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 12 |  | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 93 |  | 8 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 8 | 4 |  | 5 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 8 | 7 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | Ben Watson | 32 | 3.9 | 2.4 | 58 | 36 | 240 |  | 20 | 35 | 15 | 25 | 0 | 20 |  | 0 | 10 | 25 | 0 | 5 | 30 | 0 | 25 | 30 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 22 |  | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 |  | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 |  |  General overview: Without HC Sean 
              Payton roaming the sidelines last year, the Saints lost their way 
              despite posting another season’s worth of impressive offensive 
              numbers. The main change figures to be a recommitment to the running 
              game and Ingram in particular. While New Orleans will always pass 
              significantly more than it runs with Brees under center, it attempted 
              301 more throws than rushing attempts in 2012 – a far cry 
              from the plus-231 mark in 2011. While their awful defense played 
              a large role in that discrepancy, the Saints rarely made establishing 
              the run enough of a priority. Ingram and Thomas – both somewhat 
              injury-prone – will likely each average 10-12 touches per 
              game while Sproles should be much more involved than he was as a 
              runner (48 carries in 2012 after posting 87 in 2011). Despite the 
              renewed emphasis on the running game, New Orleans will only go as 
              far as Brees can take them. Sproles’ inconsistent usage and 
              Graham’s wrist injury were perhaps the most frustrating parts 
              of last season and should not be a concern for either this season. 
              Colston and Moore return to their usual roles, but the team will 
              need someone like Morgan to put a firm grasp on the situational 
              deep threat role that Devery Henderson held for many years in “The 
              Big Easy”.
 Matchup analysis: Few opponents 
                have a player that can cover Graham or Sproles – let alone 
                both – with one defender and even fewer have more than two 
                cornerbacks to keep Colston and Moore in check as well. The early 
                slate is very encouraging for Brees and Sproles while Graham should 
                really excel over the second half of the season. Colston works 
                out of the slot more than half the time (55.7% in 2012 per Pro 
                Football Focus), making Graham or injuries the biggest obstacles 
                between him and a 90-catch season. Only Seattle boasts three corners 
                (including new slot CB Antoine Winfield) that can realistically 
                expect to bottle him up no matter where he lines up. Moore is 
                a bit more of a wild-card, but should be a joy to own in the fantasy 
                playoffs. Because the Saints employ a three-man running back committee 
                based on situation, it does little good to put much stock in the 
                matchup – outside of Ingram against a stout run defense. 
                Therefore, Sproles will receive no red boxes by his name while 
                Thomas will see very few given his contributions in the passing 
                game. Payton has worked Ingram into the passing-game mix more 
                often than usual this offseason, which will come in handy during 
                the first half of the schedule if it carries over to Sundays. 
                The back end of the schedule should not be nearly as difficult 
                as the first half, which should allow Ingram to finally live up 
                to his first-round draft-pick status – should he remain 
                healthy that long.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Tampa Bay Buccaneers |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | NYJ | NO | NE | ARI | bye | PHI | ATL | CAR | SEA | MIA | ATL | DET | CAR | BUF | SF | STL |  
 | QB | Josh Freeman | 25 | 20.8 | 20.8 | 311.7 | 311.7 | 3830 |  | 235 | 325 | 205 | 315 |  | 335 | 215 | 230 | 195 | 295 | 305 | 255 | 245 | 175 | 220 | 280 |  
 |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 28 |  | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 |  | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |  
 |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 12 |  | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  
 |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 145 |  | 5 | 15 | 5 | 0 |  | 15 | 5 | 15 | 5 | 20 | 0 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 20 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Doug Martin | 24 | 22.1 | 18.1 | 331 | 271 | 1420 |  | 110 | 125 | 80 | 105 |  | 85 | 70 | 140 | 55 | 85 | 120 | 85 | 85 | 105 | 70 | 100 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 11 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 510 |  | 35 | 40 | 25 | 60 |  | 30 | 15 | 25 | 45 | 25 | 70 | 40 | 15 | 25 | 15 | 45 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 60 |  | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 |  | 4 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | RB | Michael Smith | 25 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 22.5 | 17.5 | 135 |  | 15 | 0 | 10 | 10 |  | 15 | 5 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 5 |  
 |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 40 |  | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 |  | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Vincent Jackson | 30 | 16.4 | 11.7 | 246 | 176 | 1160 |  | 40 | 115 | 70 | 65 |  | 125 | 80 | 70 | 35 | 110 | 65 | 80 | 65 | 45 | 85 | 110 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 10 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 70 |  | 2 | 7 | 6 | 4 |  | 8 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 6 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Mike Williams | 26 | 14.6 | 10.4 | 219.5 | 155.5 | 1015 |  | 80 | 90 | 55 | 100 |  | 70 | 50 | 45 | 55 | 100 | 75 | 40 | 85 | 75 | 55 | 40 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 9 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 64 |  | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 |  | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Kevin Ogletree | 26 | 5.6 | 3.4 | 83.5 | 50.5 | 385 |  | 30 | 25 | 15 | 25 |  | 35 | 40 | 30 | 10 | 40 | 15 | 45 | 30 | 10 | 20 | 15 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 33 |  | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 |  | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | WR | Tiquan Underwood | 26 | 3.9 | 2.7 | 59 | 41 | 290 |  | 20 | 35 | 0 | 35 |  | 15 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 20 | 50 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 25 | 35 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 18 |  | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 |  | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 |  
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
 | TE | Tom Crabtree | 27 | 5.1 | 3.1 | 76.5 | 46.5 | 345 |  | 25 | 10 | 30 | 25 |  | 50 | 20 | 15 | 35 | 0 | 20 | 40 | 25 | 15 | 0 | 35 |  
 |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  
 |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 30 |  | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 |  | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 |  |  General overview: Unlike the beginning 
              of last season, Martin is the clear-cut feature back and the focal 
              point of the offense. Outside of a possible upgrade at the third 
              receiver spot and downgrade at tight end, the skill positions remain 
              mostly the same. However, the one big difference from last year 
              is the Bucs should more than seven combined games from guards Carl 
              Nicks and Davin Joseph. Although Tampa Bay will likely remain a 
              run-oriented offense for as long as HC Greg Schiano is in charge, 
              the time is now for Freeman to make the leap to near-elite quarterbacks 
              that many thought he was capable of following the 2010 season. With 
              Martin a 50-60 catch threat out of the backfield and the weekly 
              mismatch that Jackson and Williams often provide, the fifth-year 
              signal-caller should finally reach his comfort zone in his second 
              year under OC Mike Sullivan. A review of his eight interceptions 
              – which accounted for nearly half of his total for the season 
              – over Weeks 15-16 reveal that Freeman made some poor decisions, 
              but was also hung out to dry on several occasions as well. After 
              suggesting there would be competition for the starting job in the 
              offseason following Freeman’s late-season demise, Schiano 
              has made it clear recently that rookie Mike Glennon is not a threat 
              to the starting job. With better luck in the injury department up 
              front this season, Freeman could have a career year.
 Matchup analysis: Despite four 
                difficult matchups, it would be unwise to suggest Martin is not 
                a threat for 100 total yards and a touchdown every week. It is 
                hard to imagine a much better first-half slate (through Week 8), 
                with the offensively-challenged Jets and two defenses in the Saints 
                and Panthers who figure to be average at best against the run. 
                Seattle and Miami will pose a stiff challenge in consecutive weeks, 
                but only San Francisco in Week 15 stands out as an opponent that 
                should give owners moderate concern. A quick glance at Jackson’s 
                schedule suggests the 30-year-old might be in for a down season, 
                but the combination of a dominant running game and the fact he 
                spends a fair amount of time in the slot (36.5% in 2012 per Pro 
                Football Focus) will help him be productive in a number of games 
                against some of the league’s best cornerbacks (such as Antonio 
                Cromartie and Patrick Peterson before the bye as well as Richard 
                Sherman and Stephon Gilmore after the break), almost none of which 
                will follow him inside. Due to the likelihood that few of the 
                Bucs’ opponents will have a suitable matchup for Williams 
                until the fantasy playoffs, his slate suggests he could top 1,000 
                yards for the first time.  Suggestions, comments, about the article or 
                fantasy football in general? E-mail 
                me or follow me on Twitter. 
                
 Doug Orth has written for FF Today 
              since 2006 and appeared in USA Today’s Fantasy Football Preview 
              magazine in 2010 and 2011. He hosted USA Today’s hour-long, 
              pre-kickoff fantasy football internet chat every Sunday this past 
              season. Doug regularly appears as a fantasy football analyst on 
              Sirius XM’s “Fantasy Drive” and for 106.7 The 
              Fan (WJFK – Washington, D.C). He is also a member of the Fantasy 
              Sports Writers Association.
 |