A d v e r t i s e m e n t
Having discussed the benefits of breaking down each individual matchup
last week, I don’t feel inclined to rehash it for you this
week. (Please feel free to browse my
AFC-NFC East projections if you want to review some of the thinking
and methodology behind this system.)
Even though I have yet to finish all the projections or even
build my first “Big Board”, fantasy football is alive
and well. I am in the midst of an experts’
dynasty league draft and am eagerly anticipating my second
year in the Pros
vs. Joes competition put on by the Fantasy Football Players
Championship (FFPC) this Friday. Last year’s entry crashed
and burned in this best-ball Draftmaster-style format as my team
suffered from an unexpected team change by a player (Zach Miller),
season-ending injuries to two of my top five picks (Jamaal Charles
and Peyton Manning) and three of my running backs (Charles, Ryan
Williams and Tim Hightower), which overshadowed incredible value
picks such as Wes Welker in the fourth, Steve Smith in the eighth
and Darren Sproles in the 13th. The injury picks that could have
been avoided – Manning and Williams – are the very
reason I don’t participate in early money-league drafts,
especially those that follow lockouts. However, I could have still
made a strong run for the title if Kyle Orton hadn’t been
my only other quarterback. Since the draft is the first and last
act an owner makes in Draftmaster format, I was helpless to address
the position and received zero points each week from my quarterback
for about half a season.
But as a wise man once said, “You are the only person that
cares about your fantasy team.” So with that bit of wisdom
dispensed, let’s move on with the show…
Here’s a quick review of what each color means in my color-coded
family:
Red – A very difficult matchup.
For lower-level players, a red matchup means they should not be
used in fantasy that week. For a second- or third-tier player,
drop your expectations for them at least one grade that week (i.e.
from WR2 to WR3). For elite players, expect them to perform one
level lower than their usual status (i.e. RB1 performs like a
RB2).
Yellow – Keep expectations
fairly low in this matchup. For lower-level players, a yellow
matchup is a borderline start at best. For a second- or third-tier
player, they can probably overcome the matchup if things fall
right. For the elite players, expect slightly better than average
production.
Grey– Basically, this matchup
is one that could go either way. In some cases, I just don’t
feel like I have a good feel yet for this defense. Generally speaking,
these matchups are winnable matchups for all levels of players.
Green – It doesn’t
get much better than this. For non-elite players, the stage is
basically set for said player to exploit the matchup. For the
elite player, this matchup should produce special numbers.
One notable change I made from last year regarding the labeling
of red, yellow or green matchups is acknowledging that while elite
players can sometimes have unfavorable matchups, their all-around
game simply makes them impossible to bench. (To take an obvious
example, sitting Michael Turner or Shonn Greene in a road matchup
vs. a fully healthy Seahawks defense is an understandable move
because Turner and Greene are highly dependent on the running
game in order to be viable in fantasy and Seattle’s run
defense is pretty solid when healthy, particularly at home. On
the other hand, LeSean McCoy cannot be benched against any defense
simply because he is so likely to get his 100 total yards almost
regardless of the competition since he is so versatile.) As a
result, the elite players will have mostly yellow boxes where
the non-elite players would typically have red. As far as the
passing game is concerned, more defenses are talking about using
“shadow” CBs than in recent years. (And just to be
clear, the term “shadow” doesn’t mean that he
is locked onto a team’s top option 100% of the time.) There
are the ”shadow” CBs most of us have become familiar
with – names such as Darrelle Revis, Johnathan Joseph and
Joe Haden – who will warrant a red box by many of the top
receivers they face. Many other cornerbacks – players like
Nnamdi Asomugha and Asante Samuel come immediately to mind –
typically remain on one side of the field, making it difficult
to give an opposing a true red since they may escape either player
by spending most of their time in the slot. In the case of Samuel,
however, he will have an equally effective corner opposite him
in Brent Grimes, making the slot (against the disappointing Dunta
Robinson) the only place of refuge for opposing receivers.
I’ve updated the notes since last week, so please read
over them closely to better understand what you see below in the
tables:
Notes:
- The grey highlight in each team’s schedule reflects
a road game.
- These are my initial projections and therefore subject
to change. In a few cases, the changes will be dramatic. Changes
may come in the form of a different-colored matchup and/or a
player’s “game log”. In some cases, a strong
preseason may warrant the inclusion of one name in a team projection
and the removal of another. I also feel obligated to mention
that players with minimal projections (such as less than 100
yards rushing or receiving) will be excluded from this four-week
series but have been accounted for in my overall projections.
- For all those readers whose eyes gravitate immediately
to the player’s final numbers: they are 15-game totals
because most fantasy seasons have a Week 16 title game.
- The age you see by each player will be that player’s
age as of September 1, 2012.
- Since some players have such a unique role – Brad
Smith last week and John Kuhn this week, for example –
I have listed all their matchups as neutral.
Key to the table below:
PPR Aver - Points
per game in full-point PPR leagues where all touchdowns are worth
six points.
NPPR Aver - Points per game in non-PPR
leagues where all touchdowns are worth six points.
PPR - Total points scored in PPR
Non-PPR - Total points scored in
non-PPR.
AFC NORTH
Baltimore Ravens |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CIN |
PHI |
NE |
CLE |
KC |
DAL |
HOU |
bye |
CLE |
OAK |
PIT |
SD |
PIT |
WAS |
DEN |
NYG |
QB |
Joe Flacco |
27 |
17.2 |
17.2 |
258.2 |
258.2 |
3605 |
|
230 |
210 |
320 |
175 |
230 |
285 |
215 |
|
185 |
265 |
245 |
290 |
185 |
230 |
210 |
330 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
10 |
|
5 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
10 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Ray Rice |
25 |
22.2 |
17.8 |
333.5 |
267.5 |
1265 |
|
90 |
110 |
60 |
120 |
75 |
85 |
70 |
|
65 |
130 |
55 |
80 |
45 |
100 |
120 |
60 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
570 |
|
20 |
55 |
70 |
20 |
40 |
50 |
15 |
|
20 |
15 |
35 |
55 |
45 |
45 |
15 |
70 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
3 |
6 |
8 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
|
3 |
2 |
4 |
7 |
5 |
4 |
2 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Bernard Pierce |
22 |
3.5 |
3.1 |
45.5 |
40.5 |
260 |
|
15 |
20 |
10 |
30 |
10 |
20 |
15 |
|
20 |
25 |
15 |
INJ |
INJ |
30 |
15 |
35 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
|
0 |
10 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
5 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
2 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Anquan Boldin |
31 |
12.4 |
7.6 |
173 |
107 |
770 |
|
45 |
60 |
60 |
70 |
65 |
35 |
65 |
|
55 |
35 |
80 |
40 |
INJ |
55 |
45 |
60 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
3 |
6 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
3 |
5 |
|
4 |
3 |
7 |
4 |
INJ |
5 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Torrey Smith |
23 |
12.4 |
8.5 |
186.5 |
127.5 |
915 |
|
85 |
35 |
75 |
30 |
50 |
85 |
15 |
|
45 |
100 |
70 |
80 |
25 |
85 |
30 |
105 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
6 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
|
3 |
7 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Jacoby Jones |
28 |
3.6 |
2.2 |
54.5 |
33.5 |
275 |
|
20 |
0 |
15 |
10 |
35 |
15 |
40 |
|
10 |
15 |
0 |
25 |
30 |
10 |
40 |
10 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Tandon Doss |
22 |
1.9 |
0.9 |
28 |
14 |
140 |
|
10 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
|
20 |
10 |
15 |
15 |
30 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Ed Dickson |
25 |
8.2 |
5.2 |
115 |
73 |
490 |
|
20 |
45 |
50 |
INJ |
10 |
70 |
30 |
|
25 |
15 |
35 |
55 |
30 |
25 |
35 |
45 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
INJ |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
2 |
4 |
3 |
INJ |
1 |
6 |
3 |
|
2 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Dennis Pitta |
27 |
5.3 |
3.3 |
79 |
49 |
310 |
|
25 |
15 |
35 |
30 |
30 |
25 |
10 |
|
10 |
30 |
10 |
10 |
20 |
0 |
35 |
25 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
2 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
|
1 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
|
General overview: Much to the chagrin
of Joe Flacco (and his agent, I’m sure), the fifth-year pro
isn’t the best quarterback in the league – or anywhere
close to it, for that matter. (Take a look at his QB
rating against some of the better defenses last season.) In
no way am I suggesting that he’ll never become a top quarterback,
but his assertion that he is there now is ridiculous. After their
Week 9 debacle against the Seahawks in which , the Ravens decided
less of Flacco and more of Ray Rice was a good thing and were rewarded
with a 7-2 finish to the season. One of the big factors in that
late-season success: Flacco did not attempt more than 36 passes
over his team’s final nine games after having done so five
times over the first nine weeks. While half a season is still a
relatively small sample size in the overall scheme of things, don’t
look for OC Cam Cameron to go away from Rice as the centerpiece
of the offense again anytime soon since it seems to upset his teammates
and fantasy owners alike every time he does – as it should.
The other major consideration is that with its loss of DE/LB Terrell
Suggs, Baltimore may want to try even harder to play ball-control.
Torrey Smith’s arrival on the scene last year was a pleasant
surprise and he has emerged as the best fantasy WR option this team
has, although the addition of another deep threat (Jacoby Jones)
should help Anquan Boldin squeeze out another quality year or two
as the main option in the slot. At TE, the Ravens own one of the
league’s better two-man tight end tandems in Ed Dickson and
Dennis Pitta.
Matchup analysis: In a theme that
figures to be repeated several times throughout this piece, the
AFC North is a meat grinder of a division. While almost every other
division in the league seems to have an offensive juggernaut, this
one has a litany of teams that run the ball and play solid defense.
Throw in the first-place schedule the Ravens face along with four
games against the NFC East and perhaps no team has a more difficult
schedule as a whole than Baltimore. The passing-game matchups are
brutal as the case could be made that five of the seven pre-bye
contests feature teams with potentially elite defenses (Philadelphia
and Houston), lockdown cornerbacks attached to good schemes (Joe
Haden with Cleveland, Brandon Flowers with Kansas City) or a defense
that should finally be able to play up to its potential now with
a wealth of talent in the secondary (Dallas) to complement one of
the league’s best pass rushers in DeMarcus Ware. They face
the Browns coming out of the bye and it really doesn’t get
any easier, which is a big reason why Smith is a poor bet to experience
any kind of dramatic increase over last season. (In fact, I’m
pretty sure my projection for him is his absolute ceiling.) However,
just because I don’t see Smith posting huge numbers doesn’t
mean he doesn’t have to be accounted for, so look for just
about everyone else to post healthy reception totals as a result.
When compared to the passing game, Rice’s matchup line looks
relatively tame, but much of the credit for that goes to his all-around
game. (Take a look at Bernard Pierce’s matchup line in case
you want to know how difficult things could be for Rice if he was
just an average back.) While the fantasy playoff schedule isn’t
ideal for Rice, it is hardly insurmountable for a player of his
talents; with his contract situation resolved, he is still unquestionably
a top-three pick in fantasy.
Cincinnati Bengals |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BAL |
CLE |
WAS |
JAX |
MIA |
CLE |
PIT |
bye |
DEN |
NYG |
KC |
OAK |
SD |
DAL |
PHI |
PIT |
QB |
Andy Dalton |
24 |
17.3 |
17.3 |
259.6 |
259.6 |
3590 |
|
245 |
180 |
255 |
260 |
235 |
260 |
215 |
|
225 |
280 |
220 |
275 |
255 |
250 |
225 |
210 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
15 |
15 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
|
15 |
10 |
10 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
5 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
BenJarvus Green-Ellis |
27 |
9.9 |
8.9 |
148 |
134 |
830 |
|
45 |
70 |
50 |
65 |
70 |
55 |
30 |
|
65 |
35 |
65 |
75 |
60 |
50 |
60 |
35 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
5 |
0 |
10 |
15 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Bernard Scott |
29 |
7.5 |
6.2 |
104.5 |
86.5 |
555 |
|
35 |
40 |
20 |
15 |
55 |
50 |
30 |
|
40 |
75 |
45 |
35 |
INJ |
45 |
50 |
20 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
|
15 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
5 |
15 |
0 |
|
15 |
0 |
20 |
10 |
INJ |
15 |
10 |
10 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
INJ |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Brian Leonard |
28 |
3.8 |
2 |
57.5 |
30.5 |
125 |
|
10 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
15 |
0 |
15 |
|
5 |
0 |
10 |
15 |
25 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
15 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
20 |
10 |
15 |
|
20 |
15 |
0 |
10 |
20 |
15 |
20 |
10 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
|
3 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
A.J. Green |
24 |
16.5 |
11.4 |
247 |
171 |
1110 |
|
50 |
75 |
105 |
85 |
65 |
45 |
70 |
|
45 |
120 |
75 |
115 |
75 |
50 |
55 |
80 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
4 |
6 |
7 |
6 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
|
3 |
8 |
6 |
6 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Mohamed Sanu |
23 |
8.8 |
5.2 |
114 |
67 |
490 |
|
35 |
30 |
25 |
30 |
50 |
40 |
45 |
|
65 |
20 |
30 |
45 |
INJ |
INJ |
35 |
40 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
|
5 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
INJ |
INJ |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Jordan Shipley |
26 |
5.4 |
3.2 |
81.5 |
47.5 |
415 |
|
20 |
15 |
45 |
20 |
30 |
45 |
10 |
|
40 |
35 |
30 |
15 |
35 |
40 |
10 |
25 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
2 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
|
3 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Brandon Tate |
24 |
2 |
1.3 |
30 |
19 |
190 |
|
20 |
0 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
30 |
0 |
|
0 |
40 |
20 |
0 |
20 |
35 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Jermaine Gresham |
24 |
12.3 |
7.9 |
184 |
118 |
760 |
|
50 |
55 |
35 |
75 |
55 |
45 |
50 |
|
35 |
50 |
30 |
60 |
70 |
60 |
55 |
35 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
4 |
5 |
3 |
7 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
|
3 |
5 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Orson Charles |
21 |
2.1 |
1.1 |
32 |
16 |
160 |
|
10 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
15 |
25 |
|
5 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
15 |
10 |
30 |
10 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
General overview: Coming off a season in which the Bengals managed
to make the playoffs with a rookie quarterback, a rookie receiver
and first-year play-caller in an offensive attack led by Cedric
Benson, the arrow for this offense has to be pointing up, right?
There’s no question A.J. Green is the real deal, but Cincinnati
doesn’t appear ready yet to sacrifice its identity as a running
team anytime soon despite the fact that its two best playmakers
are in the passing game – Green and Jermaine Gresham. (And
let’s not even get into the complete misuse of Gresham to
this point in his career right now…) To their credit, the
Bengals attacked their receiver position in the offseason and should
have no shortage of young talent on the roster for years to come.
Rookie Mohamed Sanu looks to be the favorite to start opposite Green
for now, but the team has praised the work of Brandon Tate and Armon
Binns this spring and summer. Throughout the offseason, we have
consistently heard that Cincinnati intends on giving Bernard Scott
his fair share of playing time for the first time in his career,
which flies in the face of HC Marvin Lewis’ assertion that
new RB BenJarvus Green-Ellis is a “three-down back”
– something the coach said shortly after signing the former
Patriot. Not only has the “Law Firm” rarely ever shown
he should be on the field in passing situations, but both Scott
and Brian Leonard are bigger threats as receivers anyway. As a result,
this has the look of a 50-35-15 backfield split with Scott relieving
BJGE once about every three series and sharing some of the work
in the passing game with Leonard.
Matchup analysis: In order for the “Law Firm” to
recoup some of the fantasy value he had during his final two years
with the Patriots, he needed to be featured in Cincy since he
won’t have the same kind of regular access to the end zone
that he did in New England. That doesn’t appear to be happening
here and, with his matchups, he looks to be a poor bet to reach
double-digit touchdowns for the third straight season. (If he
has one saving grace, however, it is that he is one of the best
goal-line backs in the league.) Each year, the 3-4 games during
the fantasy season against the Steelers and Ravens don’t
come as a surprise, but there just isn’t much reason for
optimism in this backfield this year with four more games against
the improved defenses of the NFC East and a few potentially good
offensive teams from the AFC West at the end of the schedule that
may force Cincinnati to abandon the run. Green-Ellis’ best
shot at fantasy value early are in Weeks 2, 5 and 6; after the
break, he’s going to need help. Scott offers big-play potential,
but he’s going to be hard-pressed to make a huge difference
in fantasy with a ceiling of roughly 150 touches, most of which
figure to be rushing attempts. In the passing game, Green also
has his work cut out for him against a number of the league’s
top corners and/or pass defenses, but proved last season that
he is already up to the challenge in that regard. I doubt the
same can be said about any of the other aforementioned receivers
(Sanu, Jordan Shipley, Tate or Binns) and their ability to produce
consistently against the highest level of competition, which should
lead to an increased reliance on Gresham. As a result of the challenging
defenses the Bengals should expect to see this year, don’t
be surprised to see a bit of a “sophomore slump” from
Andy Dalton. While his likely regression will probably be attributed
to defenses “figuring him out”, he will almost certainly
be able to place the bulk of the blame in a running game that
may not strike fear into many opponents and a group of secondary
receivers (of course, not including Green) too young to overcome
it.
Cleveland Browns |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PHI |
CIN |
BUF |
BAL |
NYG |
CIN |
IND |
SD |
BAL |
bye |
DAL |
PIT |
OAK |
KC |
WAS |
DEN |
QB |
Brandon Weeden |
28 |
13.4 |
13.4 |
188.1 |
188.1 |
3190 |
|
200 |
215 |
240 |
210 |
255 |
285 |
230 |
285 |
190 |
|
90 |
INJ |
275 |
215 |
270 |
230 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
0 |
INJ |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
0 |
INJ |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
0 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
10 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
|
0 |
INJ |
5 |
10 |
5 |
10 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QB |
Seneca Wallace |
32 |
12.1 |
12.1 |
24.2 |
24.2 |
330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Trent Richardson |
22 |
15.7 |
13.4 |
220 |
187 |
1165 |
|
85 |
100 |
90 |
35 |
INJ |
75 |
150 |
80 |
60 |
|
80 |
45 |
120 |
75 |
80 |
90 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
225 |
|
25 |
10 |
20 |
20 |
INJ |
10 |
0 |
10 |
15 |
|
30 |
15 |
10 |
25 |
10 |
25 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
3 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
INJ |
2 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
|
4 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Brandon Jackson |
26 |
5.4 |
3.3 |
65 |
40 |
170 |
|
15 |
15 |
10 |
10 |
25 |
10 |
10 |
15 |
10 |
|
20 |
15 |
15 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
170 |
|
15 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
40 |
15 |
20 |
5 |
5 |
|
10 |
5 |
35 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
|
2 |
1 |
5 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Montario Hardesty |
25 |
2.5 |
2.1 |
27.5 |
23.5 |
215 |
|
10 |
0 |
15 |
10 |
55 |
15 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
INJ |
10 |
10 |
20 |
30 |
40 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
INJ |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
INJ |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Greg Little |
23 |
12.8 |
8 |
192 |
120 |
900 |
|
40 |
55 |
80 |
45 |
70 |
75 |
85 |
65 |
40 |
|
45 |
65 |
105 |
30 |
70 |
30 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
4 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
5 |
7 |
5 |
3 |
|
4 |
4 |
8 |
3 |
6 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Mohamed Massaquoi |
25 |
7.2 |
4.5 |
107.5 |
67.5 |
555 |
|
25 |
45 |
40 |
20 |
40 |
70 |
30 |
85 |
40 |
|
20 |
15 |
25 |
40 |
25 |
35 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
2 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
|
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Travis Benjamin |
22 |
3.5 |
2.1 |
49 |
29 |
290 |
|
0 |
20 |
0 |
INJ |
15 |
30 |
30 |
25 |
35 |
|
10 |
30 |
0 |
15 |
35 |
45 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
0 |
2 |
0 |
INJ |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
|
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Josh Gordon |
21 |
5.4 |
3.5 |
81 |
53 |
410 |
|
0 |
0 |
10 |
25 |
15 |
25 |
15 |
0 |
30 |
|
65 |
20 |
50 |
60 |
50 |
45 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
|
3 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Ben Watson |
31 |
8.8 |
5.2 |
114.5 |
67.5 |
495 |
|
30 |
40 |
55 |
35 |
40 |
60 |
25 |
65 |
15 |
|
INJ |
INJ |
35 |
25 |
50 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
3 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
6 |
2 |
|
INJ |
INJ |
3 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Evan Moore |
27 |
5.3 |
3.3 |
74 |
46 |
280 |
|
20 |
10 |
35 |
25 |
10 |
INJ |
25 |
30 |
5 |
|
40 |
30 |
10 |
15 |
20 |
5 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
2 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
INJ |
2 |
3 |
1 |
|
4 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
General overview: If team president Mike Holmgren and everyone under
his direction are truly on the hot seat this year, they certainly
cannot be accused of playing things conservatively. This offense
has undergone a major facelift and has improved its talent base
dramatically. The main question is whether or not HC Pat Shurmur
be around to see it through. For the foreseeable future, the offense
will revolve around the talents of Trent Richardson, who is one
of the better running back prospects to come out in recent years.
In a league where 300-touch RBs are a dying breed, Richardson appears
to be a pretty good bet to hit that mark a few times over the next
4-5 years. With a legitimate big-play threat like Richardson behind
him, fellow rookie Brandon Weeden will have more of a shot at taking
quality shots down the field than Colt McCoy ever did. Certainly,
a big part of Cleveland’s small-ball approach with McCoy was
his limited arm strength, but another key reason was the lack of
receivers who could actually threaten a defense deep. Speaking of
such receivers, the Browns gave away their second-round pick in
2013 for Josh Gordon, the prize of the supplemental draft. Like
Greg Little (6-2, 220), Gordon (6-4, 220) gives the Browns another
big receiver that teams usually want in the West Coast offense.
And file TE Jordan Cameron’s name away as he may get a chance
to flash this season with some question marks ahead of him on the
depth chart. With improvements also made on the offensive line,
the future is brighter now (for fans and fantasy owners) than it
has been in some time for Cleveland. Whether or not the team makes
enough tangible progress this season is another question.
Matchup analysis: With a fair amount of buzz coming out of Cleveland
that Brandon Jackson will take some or most of the passing-down
work, it would be a minor shock if Richardson hasn’t already
assumed that role early in the season. Like the back he has been
compared to repeatedly throughout the offseason – Adrian
Peterson – Richardson won’t be matchup-proof simply
because he won’t likely be given the opportunity to catch
40-50 balls right away like the Ray Rices, Arian Fosters and LeSean
McCoys of the world. But with a solid run-blocking line in front
of him and commitment to him as the centerpiece of this offense,
only a lackluster showing by the Browns’ defense (i.e. falling
behind by multiple scores early in games) or injury figure to
keep Richardson from producing like a low-end RB1 right away.
The first half of the schedule isn’t particularly easy,
but for someone with his combination of talent and expected workload,
it also isn’t overly daunting either. The hardest stretch
appears to be the five-week period in the two weeks before and
after the bye. The payoff for his owners should come after that
during the fantasy playoffs. I’m not nearly as optimistic
about the passing game, however, even though I do expect Little
to build on a 61-catch rookie season. Little has reportedly made
huge strides this offseason and will benefit from the talent upgrades
around him, including a more accurate and stronger-armed quarterback.
With so many first- and second-year players expected to be playing
key roles, it wouldn’t be fair to expect Weeden to pull
an Andy Dalton and push this team into the playoffs with a positive
TD-to-INT ratio. In three of his first five games, Weeden will
be asked to face some of the teams that should have the best pass
rushes in the game this year. In the other two games, he must
face Cincinnati and Baltimore on the road. Even though I did highlight
two green matchups for Weeden, I expect HC Chuck Pagano to have
his Colts’ defense overachieving by the middle part of the
season and HC Dennis Allen to have his Raiders’ secondary
playing well by the time the Browns visit.
Pittsburgh Steelers |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEN |
NYJ |
OAK |
bye |
PHI |
TEN |
CIN |
WAS |
NYG |
KC |
BAL |
CLE |
BAL |
SD |
DAL |
CIN |
QB |
Ben Roethlisberger |
30 |
17.8 |
17.8 |
266.9 |
266.9 |
3710 |
|
265 |
215 |
255 |
|
235 |
280 |
270 |
175 |
280 |
225 |
270 |
270 |
205 |
305 |
275 |
185 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
5 |
5 |
0 |
|
15 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
0 |
15 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QB |
Byron Leftwich |
32 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Rashard Mendenhall |
25 |
6.2 |
5.2 |
55.5 |
46.5 |
275 |
|
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
|
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
20 |
10 |
10 |
20 |
50 |
35 |
55 |
25 |
50 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
|
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
|
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
5 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
10 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
|
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
|
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Isaac Redman |
27 |
11.1 |
9.8 |
166 |
147 |
945 |
|
90 |
80 |
115 |
|
70 |
60 |
75 |
65 |
45 |
90 |
35 |
50 |
35 |
40 |
55 |
40 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
15 |
15 |
0 |
|
10 |
5 |
15 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
2 |
3 |
0 |
|
2 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Jonathan Dwyer |
23 |
5.1 |
4.8 |
50.5 |
47.5 |
340 |
|
40 |
25 |
50 |
|
45 |
65 |
20 |
25 |
35 |
20 |
15 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
10 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Chris Rainey |
24 |
5.3 |
3.3 |
68.5 |
43.5 |
140 |
|
10 |
10 |
5 |
|
20 |
15 |
INJ |
INJ |
5 |
10 |
0 |
35 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
15 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
235 |
|
35 |
0 |
20 |
|
25 |
20 |
INJ |
INJ |
15 |
25 |
15 |
20 |
0 |
35 |
10 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
3 |
0 |
2 |
|
2 |
2 |
INJ |
INJ |
2 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Mike Wallace |
26 |
14.2 |
10 |
213 |
150 |
1080 |
|
35 |
40 |
105 |
|
60 |
135 |
90 |
75 |
80 |
40 |
50 |
50 |
70 |
115 |
80 |
55 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
2 |
3 |
5 |
|
4 |
5 |
6 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
6 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Antonio Brown |
24 |
13.4 |
8.6 |
200.5 |
128.5 |
985 |
|
60 |
50 |
70 |
|
40 |
75 |
80 |
80 |
45 |
100 |
65 |
90 |
45 |
85 |
60 |
40 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
5 |
4 |
5 |
|
3 |
6 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
5 |
7 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Emmanuel Sanders |
25 |
6.5 |
4 |
78.5 |
48.5 |
365 |
|
50 |
40 |
20 |
|
25 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
50 |
5 |
30 |
25 |
40 |
10 |
40 |
30 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
|
2 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
4 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Jerricho Cotchery |
30 |
4.5 |
2.9 |
68 |
43 |
310 |
|
25 |
35 |
0 |
|
25 |
15 |
35 |
30 |
10 |
25 |
40 |
0 |
15 |
15 |
25 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
2 |
2 |
0 |
|
2 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Heath Miller |
29 |
9.4 |
5.8 |
141 |
87 |
570 |
|
25 |
35 |
40 |
|
45 |
30 |
45 |
35 |
55 |
15 |
65 |
55 |
25 |
30 |
50 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
2 |
5 |
4 |
|
5 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
|
General overview: Where to begin…ex-OC Bruce Arians was essentially
shown the door, opening the door for new OC Todd Haley to take over.
Haley has promised a stronger commitment to the running game with
more high-percentage passing, but the talent on the roster (at least
when it is healthy or not taking part in offseason workouts) suggests
this is still a big-play offense that needs to ride Ben Roethlisberger’s
arm. It is anyone’s guess when WR Mike Wallace will report
to the team, but as of now, he doesn’t appear to be a threat
to miss much – if any – training camp. The circumstances
are much different for Rashard Mendenhall, who has either “healed
wonderfully” (if you believe him) or a candidate for the PUP
list (if you believe modern medicine) following his ACL tear on
New Year’s Day last season. The commitment to the running
game would have made more sense with a healthy Mendenhall, so there
is reason to be skeptical about how much this offense is really
changing. For what it is worth, Haley has directed a successful
running attack as a head coach in Kansas City and a prolific passing
attack as a play-caller in Arizona. One player that has caught Haley’s
eye is TE Heath Miller, who is the most complete TE he has worked
with since Jason Witten more than five years ago. It is also worth
noting that Haley found another gadget player to give defenses fits
in rookie Chris Rainey. While he cannot serve as a change-of-pace
or emergency running back like former Haley protégé
Dexter McCluster nor is he another hybrid player like Percy Harvin,
Rainey is every bit as explosive – if not more so –
than either player. Like McCluster, he’ll probably be just
on the cusp of fantasy relevancy but his inconsistent touches will
probably keep him from being a bench-worthy fantasy property.
Matchup analysis: Wallace had better be ready to hit the ground
running when he reports because he could get off to a rather poor
start against the likes of Champ Bailey and Darrelle Revis in
Weeks 1-2. He may find refuge against the Raiders in Week 3, but
the Steelers have an early bye in Week 4 and face the venerable
Eagles’ secondary the following week. It may be at that
point fantasy owners want to trade for him since he has “winnable”
fantasy matchups in eight of the final 12 games of the fantasy
season. The argument could be made that a safer receiver might
be teammate Antonio Brown since he obviously benefits from all
the attention Wallace commands. After all, Brown will face lesser
coverage more regularly and has already earned the respect of
Roethlisberger. Whereas Wallace could see shadow coverage at various
points in nearly half of his games in 2012, Brown should have
it relatively easy by comparison. Assuming Mendenhall begins the
season on the PUP list, this is where the running game gets interesting.
While the quarterbacks and receivers could struggle to get going
early with some difficult matchups, the same is unlikely to be
said about the ground game led by Isaac Redman. Only the Jets
strike me as a possible tough matchup out of the first six opponents
and even they need to make a great deal of improvement on their
lackluster showing in 2011. With Mendenhall likely to return about
the time that “easy” stretch comes to an end and the
strong possibility that a run of tougher defenses is about to
begin, it may not be a bad idea to shop Redman at that time. It’s
also entirely possible that we know as much now as we will in
Week 7 or 8 about whether Redman will have grabbed ahold of the
feature-back role or if Pittsburgh will force the two to work
in tandem. Worse yet, there is always the possibility that a motivated
Jonathan Dwyer will force his way into the conversation. And if
any or all of that comes to fruition, it is too bad since Pittsburgh
addressed its offensive line this offseason and has provided fantasy
owners with a consistent RB2 option for several years now.
NFC NORTH
Chicago Bears |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IND |
GB |
STL |
DAL |
JAX |
bye |
DET |
CAR |
TEN |
HOU |
SF |
MIN |
SEA |
MIN |
GB |
ARI |
QB |
Jay Cutler |
29 |
19.6 |
19.6 |
293.8 |
293.8 |
3770 |
|
270 |
365 |
210 |
270 |
260 |
|
340 |
225 |
275 |
145 |
210 |
310 |
175 |
215 |
260 |
240 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
2 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
|
3 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
170 |
|
5 |
25 |
10 |
15 |
10 |
|
15 |
0 |
10 |
15 |
10 |
5 |
20 |
20 |
10 |
0 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Matt Forte |
26 |
16 |
12.5 |
240 |
187 |
1065 |
|
80 |
70 |
110 |
65 |
70 |
|
110 |
125 |
50 |
65 |
45 |
40 |
55 |
85 |
30 |
65 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
445 |
|
35 |
50 |
15 |
25 |
10 |
|
30 |
55 |
20 |
15 |
20 |
55 |
15 |
40 |
45 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
4 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
|
4 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Michael Bush |
28 |
9.2 |
7.7 |
137.5 |
115.5 |
570 |
|
40 |
35 |
55 |
40 |
25 |
|
15 |
50 |
35 |
25 |
35 |
60 |
35 |
35 |
50 |
35 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
10 |
25 |
10 |
5 |
25 |
|
0 |
10 |
15 |
5 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
20 |
10 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
2 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Brandon Marshall |
28 |
16.6 |
10.8 |
248.5 |
162.5 |
1145 |
|
80 |
120 |
45 |
85 |
65 |
|
150 |
55 |
85 |
35 |
55 |
80 |
70 |
50 |
100 |
70 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
7 |
8 |
4 |
6 |
5 |
|
11 |
5 |
7 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Alshon Jeffery |
22 |
7.5 |
4.9 |
112.5 |
73.5 |
555 |
|
35 |
40 |
20 |
10 |
40 |
|
55 |
40 |
45 |
20 |
50 |
80 |
15 |
45 |
25 |
35 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
|
4 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Earl Bennett |
25 |
8 |
4.5 |
103.5 |
58.5 |
465 |
|
40 |
55 |
30 |
50 |
45 |
|
30 |
0 |
50 |
40 |
INJ |
INJ |
35 |
25 |
25 |
40 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
4 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
3 |
0 |
4 |
5 |
INJ |
INJ |
3 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Devin Hester |
29 |
4.7 |
3 |
70 |
45 |
390 |
|
25 |
30 |
40 |
70 |
20 |
|
55 |
30 |
0 |
0 |
35 |
55 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
30 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
2 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
|
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Kellen Davis |
26 |
9.6 |
6.1 |
144 |
92 |
560 |
|
45 |
40 |
50 |
25 |
40 |
|
15 |
35 |
60 |
30 |
40 |
40 |
20 |
45 |
45 |
30 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
4 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
|
2 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
|
General overview: It took new GM Phil Emery one offseason to do
what his predecessor had trouble doing in 11 years: find a competent
receiver to give his quarterback a chance at fielding a respectable
passing attack that forces defenses to think about someone else
besides Matt Forte. It’s not like Brandon Marshall comes without
risk – there’s a reason Chicago only had to surrender
two third-rounders to get a Pro Bowl talent like him – but
to secure a receiver who commands as much attention as he does is
a coup at that price. The fact that he also has a history with QB
Jay Cutler is just an incredible bonus. As such, the term “dynamic
offense” has a chance to be associated with this offense for
the first time in years. Chicago also took another chance on a second-round
receiver in Alshon Jeffery, who could quickly become one of the
better deep threats in the league if he decides another 25-pound
weight gain is not in his best professional interest. And the improvements
didn’t just at receiver; Emery signed Michael Bush to resume
the same kind of goal-line/change-of-pace role he had in Oakland,
replacing the mostly ineffective Marion Barber. Last but not least,
let’s not forget my obligatory mention of Mike Martz, who
was “allowed” to retire so the Bears could turn the
offense over to new OC Mike Tice and QB coach/passing-game coordinator
Jeremy Bates, who knows the Cutler-Marshall duo from his time in
Denver under then-HC Mike Shanahan. The departure of Martz and promotion
of Tice means that the tight end is now an option in the passing
game. While Martz wasn’t hiding a Vernon Davis-like talent
in Chicago, Kellen Davis was an incredibly underused option in the
passing game. I am very confident his will be one name owners will
want to get to know early in the season.
Matchup analysis: With the aforementioned personnel upgrades
and perhaps the softest slate of matchups I have seen to this
point (relative to the talent on the offense), Cutler is going
to have his best shot at 4,000+ yards and 25+ TDs since posting
the best fantasy season of his career in 2008 – his final
season as a Bronco when Bates was his position coach. Of the Bears’
first eight games, only the Rams’ Cortland Finnegan, the
Cowboys’ Morris Claiborne and the Jaguars’ Derek Cox
have the size and/or feistiness to challenge Marshall. Of those
three, only Finnegan (the smallest but feistiest of the bunch)
is likely to shadow him. Marshall – and by extension, Cutler
– could have a rough second half if Jeffery doesn’t
develop at the rate the Bears want him to since the elite defenses
of the Niners and Texans are followed by three games against the
Vikings (who have a very capable CB with size to frustrate Marshall
in Chris Cook) and Seahawks, who start a pair of cornerbacks in
6-3 Richard Sherman and 6-4 Brandon Browner that proved their
worth in 2011. In Weeks 15-16, Chicago must face what should be
an improved Packers secondary and Marshall will likely have a
“shadow date” the next week with Arizona’s Patrick
Peterson, who we should expect to be dramatically better as a
cover CB at the end of his second season than he was as a rookie.
Shifting to the running game, a fast start can be expected with
the likes of the Colts and Rams in September and the Lions, Panthers
and Titans in the three weeks following the bye. While the all-around
game of Forte and goal-line opportunities Bush will have in this
offense should keep them both relevant in fantasy, Week 9 may
be a good time to sell both players as Houston, San Francisco,
Seattle, Green Bay and Arizona all have the personnel necessary
to wreak havoc on the Bears’ rushing attack.
Detroit Lions |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STL |
SF |
TEN |
MIN |
bye |
PHI |
CHI |
SEA |
JAX |
MIN |
GB |
HOU |
IND |
GB |
ARI |
ATL |
QB |
Matthew Stafford |
24 |
25.7 |
25.7 |
385.8 |
385.8 |
4770 |
|
350 |
315 |
435 |
335 |
|
315 |
295 |
310 |
250 |
270 |
380 |
270 |
390 |
275 |
350 |
230 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
4 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
|
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
|
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
15 |
20 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Jahvid Best |
23 |
15.2 |
11.1 |
182 |
133 |
595 |
|
70 |
25 |
45 |
35 |
|
55 |
65 |
20 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
30 |
125 |
45 |
45 |
35 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
435 |
|
40 |
55 |
35 |
60 |
|
20 |
40 |
15 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
40 |
15 |
50 |
40 |
25 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
4 |
6 |
3 |
6 |
|
4 |
5 |
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
5 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Mikel Leshoure |
22 |
8.1 |
7.1 |
80.5 |
70.5 |
410 |
|
SUS |
SUS |
25 |
40 |
|
50 |
30 |
25 |
35 |
60 |
70 |
45 |
30 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
SUS |
SUS |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
SUS |
SUS |
0 |
5 |
|
10 |
0 |
5 |
15 |
5 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
SUS |
SUS |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
SUS |
SUS |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Kevin Smith |
25 |
6.1 |
4.7 |
79.5 |
60.5 |
290 |
|
35 |
30 |
15 |
10 |
|
0 |
15 |
35 |
55 |
20 |
INJ |
INJ |
10 |
30 |
15 |
20 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
15 |
5 |
5 |
10 |
|
0 |
0 |
20 |
25 |
15 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
15 |
10 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Calvin Johnson |
26 |
21.4 |
15.1 |
321.5 |
226.5 |
1485 |
|
80 |
115 |
165 |
120 |
|
80 |
115 |
90 |
55 |
70 |
130 |
65 |
180 |
65 |
110 |
45 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
5 |
8 |
11 |
7 |
|
7 |
6 |
8 |
4 |
5 |
8 |
5 |
7 |
4 |
6 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Nate Burleson |
31 |
8.4 |
5 |
125.5 |
74.5 |
565 |
|
35 |
25 |
50 |
30 |
|
40 |
40 |
50 |
65 |
30 |
50 |
30 |
40 |
20 |
25 |
35 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
3 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Titus Young |
23 |
12.4 |
8.3 |
185.5 |
124.5 |
825 |
|
110 |
30 |
80 |
40 |
|
60 |
35 |
70 |
40 |
75 |
55 |
20 |
80 |
45 |
70 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
4 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
|
6 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
7 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Ryan Broyles |
24 |
5.5 |
3.4 |
66.5 |
40.5 |
285 |
|
10 |
20 |
25 |
15 |
|
30 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
10 |
30 |
35 |
15 |
30 |
40 |
25 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
2 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
1 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Brandon Pettigrew |
27 |
11.9 |
7.2 |
179 |
108 |
720 |
|
50 |
50 |
35 |
55 |
|
65 |
35 |
60 |
35 |
20 |
80 |
45 |
60 |
35 |
45 |
50 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
|
5 |
7 |
4 |
5 |
|
7 |
3 |
6 |
3 |
2 |
8 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Tony Scheffler |
29 |
4.5 |
3 |
67.5 |
44.5 |
265 |
|
10 |
15 |
40 |
0 |
|
10 |
30 |
0 |
15 |
45 |
20 |
35 |
0 |
15 |
10 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
|
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
General overview: No team carried the flag for the passing game
last year quite like the Lions, attempting a league-high 666 passes.
Naturally, Detroit poured even more resources into its passing game
through the draft by adding a prolific slot receiver (Ryan Broyles)
to what is already an incredible offensive machine. While it could
be argued that the selection of OT Riley Reiff was made to address
the running game, the Lions have given no indication – and
for good reason – they want to move to a more balanced offense.
And it is hard to argue the point since the combination of Matthew
Stafford and Calvin Johnson is as good as there is in the game right
now. Even though Titus Young is just entering his second season,
he appears to be primed to overtake Nate Burleson as a starter at
some point this season and enjoy his breakout season. There is also
Brandon Pettigrew, who offers virtually no playmaking ability but
is clearly a safety option for Stafford that benefits greatly from
the fact that no defense can afford to commit resources to him when
Johnson and Young are stretching defenses outside the numbers. At
this point, the running game would be happy if it could simply keep
one quality running back healthy (or out of trouble) at all times.
The hope is someday that Jahvid Best can stay healthy long enough
to be this offense’s Reggie Bush while Mikel LeShoure attempts
to pound away with 12-15 “power runs” each game, similar
to what the Saints hope to do with Mark Ingram.
Matchup analysis: For most of the NFL, the Lions’ schedule
would pose a difficult challenge. Yes, Stafford and Johnson will
have their down weeks from time to time, but there are only a
few matchups that should truly give owners pause this season despite
the plethora of yellow above. For Johnson, it may be difficult
for him to find the end zone against the Niners (Week 2) and Falcons
(Week 16). But outside of that, his size, speed and leaping ability
make it next to impossible for even the best cover corners on
the schedule to match up with him. Because of the sheer number
of other weapons he has – along with Johnson – Stafford
is in a similar spot as Johnson with no opponent possessing enough
Pro Bowl-caliber defenders to cover every single threat the Lions
have. Because it is quite likely the Lions pass the ball twice
as much as they run it again this season, the combination of Best,
LeShoure and Kevin Smith are a bit harder to plan for in 2012.
I expect LeShoure to stick to the ground game with Best taking
fewer carries and the majority of the work in the passing game,
meaning his slate starts off nicely against three beatable defenses
after his suspension ends but it quickly turns difficult with
just 1-2 “easy” matchups the rest of the way. With
Detroit so committed to the pass, it may be advantageous for LeShoure’s
owners to trade him right after the bye (unless, of course, those
same owners think LeShoure will be the last man standing in this
backfield). The only really tough fantasy calls I see for Best
(and Smith if/when Best is out) are against the Niners and Falcons
– two teams with enough talent across the board on defense
and enough of a ball-control mentality on offense to stymie the
Lions’ potent attack to some degree.
Green Bay Packers |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SF |
CHI |
SEA |
NO |
IND |
HOU |
STL |
JAX |
ARI |
bye |
DET |
NYG |
MIN |
DET |
CHI |
TEN |
QB |
Aaron Rodgers |
28 |
31.6 |
31.6 |
474.6 |
474.6 |
4715 |
|
285 |
330 |
285 |
405 |
365 |
260 |
255 |
290 |
340 |
|
360 |
300 |
305 |
385 |
280 |
270 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
2 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
|
4 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
240 |
|
20 |
15 |
25 |
0 |
10 |
35 |
15 |
5 |
20 |
|
10 |
35 |
5 |
15 |
10 |
20 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QB |
Graham Harrell |
|
2 |
2 |
6.1 |
6.1 |
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
85 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
5 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
James Starks |
26 |
13.8 |
11.7 |
179.5 |
152.5 |
915 |
|
50 |
70 |
65 |
75 |
90 |
55 |
80 |
55 |
65 |
|
110 |
50 |
INJ |
INJ |
65 |
85 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
190 |
|
20 |
10 |
15 |
30 |
10 |
15 |
20 |
5 |
15 |
|
10 |
15 |
INJ |
INJ |
10 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
3 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
1 |
2 |
INJ |
INJ |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Alex Green |
24 |
6.4 |
4.8 |
96.5 |
71.5 |
490 |
|
25 |
20 |
20 |
15 |
30 |
15 |
45 |
30 |
20 |
|
15 |
30 |
60 |
70 |
50 |
45 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
10 |
15 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
15 |
5 |
15 |
10 |
|
20 |
10 |
20 |
15 |
5 |
5 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
|
4 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Brandon Saine |
23 |
2.3 |
1.1 |
34 |
16 |
60 |
|
5 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
10 |
15 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
0 |
5 |
10 |
5 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
|
0 |
5 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
0 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
John Kuhn |
29 |
3.3 |
2.5 |
50 |
38 |
70 |
|
10 |
5 |
10 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
|
10 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
10 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
5 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
|
10 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
5 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Greg Jennings |
28 |
16.3 |
11.3 |
244 |
169 |
1090 |
|
65 |
90 |
60 |
85 |
75 |
25 |
50 |
55 |
80 |
|
115 |
70 |
45 |
90 |
80 |
105 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
5 |
7 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
|
6 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Jordy Nelson |
27 |
14.7 |
10.3 |
220 |
154 |
1060 |
|
40 |
55 |
45 |
70 |
135 |
60 |
85 |
30 |
100 |
|
35 |
45 |
115 |
110 |
80 |
55 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
7 |
5 |
6 |
3 |
4 |
|
4 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Donald Driver |
37 |
5.4 |
3.6 |
81 |
54 |
300 |
|
25 |
0 |
35 |
20 |
10 |
30 |
0 |
65 |
15 |
|
20 |
0 |
10 |
35 |
10 |
25 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
2 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
2 |
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Randall Cobb |
22 |
8.2 |
5.6 |
123.5 |
84.5 |
605 |
|
25 |
50 |
70 |
45 |
20 |
45 |
25 |
10 |
40 |
|
30 |
30 |
75 |
50 |
40 |
50 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
|
4 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
James Jones |
27 |
5.4 |
3.9 |
81 |
59 |
350 |
|
30 |
25 |
0 |
65 |
20 |
0 |
35 |
15 |
15 |
|
70 |
35 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
1 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
4 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Jermichael Finley |
25 |
13.5 |
9 |
202.5 |
134.5 |
865 |
|
65 |
75 |
45 |
60 |
70 |
40 |
45 |
80 |
50 |
|
50 |
75 |
60 |
45 |
40 |
65 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
4 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
7 |
3 |
|
5 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
6 |
|
General overview: It goes without saying that Aaron Rodgers’
unmatched combination of agility and accuracy is the straw that
stirs the Packers’ drink, although it certainly helps the
cause to have such a deep and talented receiving corps. After a
forgettable 2011, don’t be a bit surprised if Jermichael Finley
finally takes the leap many expected him to make last year into
the elite group of tight ends. With a quarterback like Rodgers who
will sometimes find 10-11 different receivers during the course
of a game, Finley isn’t likely to challenge the Grahams and
Gronkowskis of the world, but he sure could make a run at them if
he simply returns to form and stays healthy. Greg Jennings is the
one constant in the passing attack, yet always seems a bit undervalued
on draft day – he’s a solid bet for 70-75 catches, 1,000
yards and 8-10 scores for the next 2-3 years at least. As memorable
as Jordy Nelson’s season was last year, it wouldn’t
be surprising to see Randall Cobb start eating into Nelson’s
production when the fantasy playoffs roll around if/once he overtakes
Donald Driver. With the way Rodgers carries the offense on his shoulders,
it is easy to forget the Packers also have a bit of a ground game,
that is, outside of his scrambles. And with any luck, owners may
get their wish for another feature back if James Starks can stay
healthy. With Alex Green returning from an ACL injury suffered during
the middle of his rookie season last year and Brandon Saine –
who will likely be limited mostly to third-down duty – the
coast is clear for Starks to give the Packers their first reliable
fantasy starter at RB since 2009.
Matchup analysis: A quarterback of Rodgers’ incredible
all-around talent does not need any help from the people who put
together the schedule, but it sure looks like he got it here.
While the schedule makers are not responsible for what divisions
Green Bay must play each year, they can control the fact that
three of the final four games the Packers play during the fantasy
season will be at home against teams that figure to field some
of the poorer pass defenses in the league. He could easily live
up to my six-game post-bye projection of 1,890 yards and 19 touchdowns.
Much like Rodgers, Jennings’ difficult matchups are front-loaded,
but the combination of Rodgers’ accuracy and the trust he
has in Jennings overcomes all but the most elite cornerbacks in
the league. Nelson’s chances to repeat his monster 2011
appear strong with the lack of red and yellow on his schedule,
but his unsustainable peripherals (such as his 22.06% touchdown
rate and his 71.4% catch rate on balls thrown more than 20 yards
down the field) suggest a regression to the mean is likely in
store. He benefited greatly from a number of weak pass defenses
last season, especially over the final two weeks of the regular
season when he accumulated over 21% of his yards and 33% of his
touchdowns once Jennings was lost for the remainder of the regular
season. Some of the Nelson’s lost production should fall
into Finley’s lap. In some of the games I re-watched during
the offseason, Finley was targeted relentlessly when defenses
played zone – a trend I expect opponents to use a lot this
season against the Packers. I think it is a stretch to say Finley
even has four yellow matchups this season – his immediate
fantasy future looks bright. The same thing can be said about
Starks if he can stay healthy. I hesitated assigning him three
reds over the first six weeks because he showed he is more-than-capable
receiver last season, but if Green Bay features him in anything
close to the same way it did Ryan Grant a few years ago, we could
be talking about him as a top 20-25 player at this point next
season with his talent and matchups following Week 6.
Minnesota Vikings |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JAX |
IND |
SF |
DET |
TEN |
WAS |
ARI |
TB |
SEA |
DET |
bye |
CHI |
GB |
CHI |
STL |
HOU |
QB |
Christian Ponder |
24 |
19.1 |
19.1 |
229.1 |
229.1 |
3165 |
|
225 |
285 |
205 |
245 |
250 |
290 |
220 |
345 |
180 |
320 |
|
280 |
320 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
1 |
3 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
3 |
2 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
10 |
25 |
15 |
10 |
5 |
15 |
25 |
10 |
5 |
20 |
|
10 |
15 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QB |
Joe Webb |
25 |
12.5 |
12.5 |
37.6 |
37.6 |
640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215 |
225 |
200 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
20 |
25 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Adrian Peterson |
27 |
11.3 |
9.9 |
158 |
139 |
880 |
|
30 |
60 |
30 |
50 |
35 |
65 |
INJ |
70 |
55 |
105 |
|
45 |
100 |
70 |
90 |
75 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
10 |
0 |
5 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
INJ |
15 |
0 |
30 |
|
25 |
10 |
5 |
15 |
10 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
INJ |
3 |
0 |
3 |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Toby Gerhart |
25 |
9.1 |
7.1 |
136 |
106 |
615 |
|
55 |
75 |
55 |
50 |
80 |
25 |
75 |
35 |
20 |
20 |
|
35 |
15 |
20 |
35 |
20 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
205 |
|
15 |
10 |
35 |
0 |
25 |
10 |
40 |
10 |
5 |
0 |
|
5 |
0 |
30 |
5 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
3 |
2 |
5 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Percy Harvin |
24 |
16.4 |
10.9 |
246 |
164 |
225 |
|
10 |
15 |
10 |
30 |
20 |
5 |
30 |
20 |
15 |
5 |
|
10 |
15 |
5 |
20 |
15 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
935 |
|
50 |
75 |
30 |
55 |
90 |
55 |
40 |
85 |
50 |
65 |
|
100 |
40 |
75 |
65 |
60 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
5 |
6 |
3 |
6 |
6 |
4 |
4 |
7 |
5 |
6 |
|
8 |
4 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Jerome Simpson |
26 |
9.5 |
6.2 |
114 |
74 |
560 |
|
SUS |
SUS |
SUS |
80 |
40 |
40 |
35 |
110 |
20 |
45 |
|
15 |
70 |
40 |
45 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
SUS |
SUS |
SUS |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
SUS |
SUS |
SUS |
5 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
7 |
2 |
3 |
|
2 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Michael Jenkins |
30 |
4.6 |
2.7 |
50.5 |
29.5 |
235 |
|
40 |
25 |
15 |
15 |
10 |
45 |
30 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
INJ |
15 |
30 |
10 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
4 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
INJ |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Greg Childs |
22 |
5.7 |
3.6 |
86 |
54 |
420 |
|
15 |
40 |
20 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
25 |
35 |
50 |
70 |
|
40 |
45 |
15 |
20 |
30 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
1 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
3 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Devin Aromashodu |
28 |
3.4 |
2 |
51 |
30 |
300 |
|
15 |
25 |
20 |
35 |
10 |
40 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
30 |
|
35 |
50 |
5 |
20 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
|
3 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Kyle Rudolph |
22 |
10.2 |
6.4 |
152.5 |
96.5 |
665 |
|
45 |
70 |
40 |
35 |
50 |
60 |
30 |
70 |
35 |
55 |
|
40 |
45 |
15 |
35 |
40 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
5 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
|
5 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
John Carlson |
28 |
4.7 |
3 |
70 |
45 |
270 |
|
25 |
35 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
40 |
10 |
5 |
20 |
25 |
|
20 |
30 |
0 |
10 |
25 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
2 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
2 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
General overview: Since joining the team in 2007, Adrian Peterson
has been the one of the few unquestioned feature backs in the
league and the centerpiece of this offense. For the first time
since he was a rookie, however, Peterson is not only a risky early-round
pick but a complete question mark for his own team. Make no mistake
about it: if the team cares at all about getting vintage production
out of Peterson in 2013 and beyond, they will force themselves
to rely on Toby Gerhart this season. The injury to Peterson made
addressing the offensive line even more of a priority –
as he has been covering up that weakness for some time now –
and the Vikings finally got the left tackle in Matt Kalil they
have needed since Bryant McKinnie essentially force-fed his way
out of Minnesota. Lost in the Vikings’ collapse last season
was the relatively solid play of rookie QB Christian Ponder. Why
“relatively”? Because despite OC Bill Musgrave’s
attempts to keep this offense from maximizing its potential by
handing a lot of playing time to veterans that may not be around
this year (Michael Jenkins, Visanthe Shiancoe), Ponder was still
able to post some fantasy-relevant games. The rookie signal-caller
did this in spite of the fact his two most talented pass-catchers
– Percy Harvin and rookie Kyle Rudolph – were relegated
to part-time duty for at least half of the year. While Rudolph’s
role is expected to increase, HC Leslie Frazier has stated that
Harvin’s workload likely will not (even if he sees more
playing time). As difficult as that may be for fantasy owners,
it truly is the best of both worlds since it increases the likelihood
that Harvin will come close to his 87-967-6 line (and 1,312 combined
rushing and receiving yards) from a season ago while also making
it easier for the team’s other receivers to benefit from
the attention he will attract from defenses. The players most
likely to benefit are deep threat Jerome Simpson (once he returns
from his season-opening three-game suspension) and Rudolph, who
can also stretch the field. However, the rich contract handed
to TE John Carlson has me asking one question about Harvin, since
he is most effective out of the slot. If the Vikings want to use
a lot of two-TE personnel groupings like they say they do, can
Harvin remain productive as a regular outside receiver?
Matchup analysis: As I detail above,
Minnesota is going to be a bit short on healthy and eligible players
to start the season, which is not good for Ponder’s early
prospects. Already saddled with two red matchups over the first
three weeks, he (and every player tied to him in the passing game)
will have a hard time being productive against the Jags or Niners
as Peterson continues to recover from his injury and Simpson serves
his suspension. Simpson returns just in time to help Harvin and
Ponder secure three winnable matchups from Weeks 4-6, but after
that point, all Vikings’ players in the passing game besides
Harvin and Rudolph should be hands-off in fantasy. The running
game is a much bigger question mark simply because we almost need
to see first just how much Peterson’s role will change this
season. Does he start running strong in Week 4? Week 7? Week 13?
For the purposes of this exercise, I have him taking back
the reins around Week 6, but I’ll be the first to admit
that is still pretty optimistic. Weeks 1 and 3 would be difficult
for a healthy Peterson, so we shouldn’t expect Gerhart to
fare very well either. Five of the next seven pre-bye games are
winnable matchups, but each team could also force the Vikings
to abandon the running game with their high-powered offensive
attack. After the bye, a less-than-100% Peterson would be bad
news against the likes of the Bears (twice), Packers and Texans,
assuming each defense is relatively healthy at that point and
the Green Bay run defense improves returns to its 2010 form.
Suggestions, comments,
musings about the article or fantasy football in general? E-mail
me or follow me on Twitter.
Doug Orth has written for FF Today
since 2006, appeared in USA Today’s Fantasy Football Preview
magazine in each of the last two seasons and served as a weekly
fantasy football analyst for 106.7 The Fan (WJFK – Washington,
D.C). He is also a member of the Fantasy Sports Writers Association. |