Fantasy Football Today - fantasy football rankings, cheatsheets, and information
A Fantasy Football Community!




Create An Account  |  Advertise  |  Contact      





Doug Orth | Archive | Email | Twitter
Staff Writer


Projections - AFC & NFC North
Preseason Matchup Analysis
7/24/12

East | North | West | South

A d v e r t i s e m e n t

Having discussed the benefits of breaking down each individual matchup last week, I don’t feel inclined to rehash it for you this week. (Please feel free to browse my AFC-NFC East projections if you want to review some of the thinking and methodology behind this system.)

Even though I have yet to finish all the projections or even build my first “Big Board”, fantasy football is alive and well. I am in the midst of an experts’ dynasty league draft and am eagerly anticipating my second year in the Pros vs. Joes competition put on by the Fantasy Football Players Championship (FFPC) this Friday. Last year’s entry crashed and burned in this best-ball Draftmaster-style format as my team suffered from an unexpected team change by a player (Zach Miller), season-ending injuries to two of my top five picks (Jamaal Charles and Peyton Manning) and three of my running backs (Charles, Ryan Williams and Tim Hightower), which overshadowed incredible value picks such as Wes Welker in the fourth, Steve Smith in the eighth and Darren Sproles in the 13th. The injury picks that could have been avoided – Manning and Williams – are the very reason I don’t participate in early money-league drafts, especially those that follow lockouts. However, I could have still made a strong run for the title if Kyle Orton hadn’t been my only other quarterback. Since the draft is the first and last act an owner makes in Draftmaster format, I was helpless to address the position and received zero points each week from my quarterback for about half a season.

But as a wise man once said, “You are the only person that cares about your fantasy team.” So with that bit of wisdom dispensed, let’s move on with the show…

Here’s a quick review of what each color means in my color-coded family:

Red – A very difficult matchup. For lower-level players, a red matchup means they should not be used in fantasy that week. For a second- or third-tier player, drop your expectations for them at least one grade that week (i.e. from WR2 to WR3). For elite players, expect them to perform one level lower than their usual status (i.e. RB1 performs like a RB2).

Yellow – Keep expectations fairly low in this matchup. For lower-level players, a yellow matchup is a borderline start at best. For a second- or third-tier player, they can probably overcome the matchup if things fall right. For the elite players, expect slightly better than average production.

Grey– Basically, this matchup is one that could go either way. In some cases, I just don’t feel like I have a good feel yet for this defense. Generally speaking, these matchups are winnable matchups for all levels of players.

Green – It doesn’t get much better than this. For non-elite players, the stage is basically set for said player to exploit the matchup. For the elite player, this matchup should produce special numbers.

One notable change I made from last year regarding the labeling of red, yellow or green matchups is acknowledging that while elite players can sometimes have unfavorable matchups, their all-around game simply makes them impossible to bench. (To take an obvious example, sitting Michael Turner or Shonn Greene in a road matchup vs. a fully healthy Seahawks defense is an understandable move because Turner and Greene are highly dependent on the running game in order to be viable in fantasy and Seattle’s run defense is pretty solid when healthy, particularly at home. On the other hand, LeSean McCoy cannot be benched against any defense simply because he is so likely to get his 100 total yards almost regardless of the competition since he is so versatile.) As a result, the elite players will have mostly yellow boxes where the non-elite players would typically have red. As far as the passing game is concerned, more defenses are talking about using “shadow” CBs than in recent years. (And just to be clear, the term “shadow” doesn’t mean that he is locked onto a team’s top option 100% of the time.) There are the ”shadow” CBs most of us have become familiar with – names such as Darrelle Revis, Johnathan Joseph and Joe Haden – who will warrant a red box by many of the top receivers they face. Many other cornerbacks – players like Nnamdi Asomugha and Asante Samuel come immediately to mind – typically remain on one side of the field, making it difficult to give an opposing a true red since they may escape either player by spending most of their time in the slot. In the case of Samuel, however, he will have an equally effective corner opposite him in Brent Grimes, making the slot (against the disappointing Dunta Robinson) the only place of refuge for opposing receivers.

I’ve updated the notes since last week, so please read over them closely to better understand what you see below in the tables:

Notes:

  1. The grey highlight in each team’s schedule reflects a road game.

  2. These are my initial projections and therefore subject to change. In a few cases, the changes will be dramatic. Changes may come in the form of a different-colored matchup and/or a player’s “game log”. In some cases, a strong preseason may warrant the inclusion of one name in a team projection and the removal of another. I also feel obligated to mention that players with minimal projections (such as less than 100 yards rushing or receiving) will be excluded from this four-week series but have been accounted for in my overall projections.

  3. For all those readers whose eyes gravitate immediately to the player’s final numbers: they are 15-game totals because most fantasy seasons have a Week 16 title game.

  4. The age you see by each player will be that player’s age as of September 1, 2012.

  5. Since some players have such a unique role – Brad Smith last week and John Kuhn this week, for example – I have listed all their matchups as neutral.

Key to the table below:

PPR Aver - Points per game in full-point PPR leagues where all touchdowns are worth six points.
NPPR Aver - Points per game in non-PPR leagues where all touchdowns are worth six points.
PPR - Total points scored in PPR
Non-PPR - Total points scored in non-PPR
.

AFC NORTH

 Baltimore Ravens
Pos Player Age PPR Aver NPPR Aver PPR Non Totals 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
CIN PHI NE CLE KC DAL HOU bye CLE OAK PIT SD PIT WAS DEN NYG
QB Joe Flacco 27 17.2 17.2 258.2 258.2 3605 230 210 320 175 230 285 215 185 265 245 290 185 230 210 330
TD 22 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 0 2 1 2
INT 13 1 2 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 1 0
Ru Yards 80 0 5 0 0 10 5 10 5 0 10 10 5 5 5 10
Ru TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RB Ray Rice 25 22.2 17.8 333.5 267.5 1265 90 110 60 120 75 85 70 65 130 55 80 45 100 120 60
Ru TD 11 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1
Re Yards 570 20 55 70 20 40 50 15 20 15 35 55 45 45 15 70
Re TD 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Rec 66 3 6 8 3 5 5 3 3 2 4 7 5 4 2 6
RB Bernard Pierce 22 3.5 3.1 45.5 40.5 260 15 20 10 30 10 20 15 20 25 15 INJ INJ 30 15 35
Ru TD 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 INJ INJ 1 0 0
Re Yards 25 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 10 0 INJ INJ 0 0 5
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ 0 0 0
Rec 5 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 INJ INJ 0 0 1
WR Anquan Boldin 31 12.4 7.6 173 107 770 45 60 60 70 65 35 65 55 35 80 40 INJ 55 45 60
Re TD 5 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 INJ 0 0 0
Rec 66 3 6 5 6 6 3 5 4 3 7 4 INJ 5 4 5
WR Torrey Smith 23 12.4 8.5 186.5 127.5 915 85 35 75 30 50 85 15 45 100 70 80 25 85 30 105
Re TD 6 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
Rec 59 6 3 5 2 3 5 1 3 7 5 6 2 4 2 5
WR Jacoby Jones 28 3.6 2.2 54.5 33.5 275 20 0 15 10 35 15 40 10 15 0 25 30 10 40 10
Re TD 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 21 2 0 2 1 2 1 3 1 1 0 1 2 1 3 1
WR Tandon Doss 22 1.9 0.9 28 14 140 10 0 10 0 0 0 15 20 10 15 15 30 0 10 5
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 14 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 2 3 0 1 1
TE Ed Dickson 25 8.2 5.2 115 73 490 20 45 50 INJ 10 70 30 25 15 35 55 30 25 35 45
Re TD 4 0 0 1 INJ 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Rec 42 2 4 3 INJ 1 6 3 2 1 3 5 3 2 3 4
TE Dennis Pitta 27 5.3 3.3 79 49 310 25 15 35 30 30 25 10 10 30 10 10 20 0 35 25
Re TD 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 30 2 1 4 2 3 2 2 1 3 1 1 2 0 4 2

General overview: Much to the chagrin of Joe Flacco (and his agent, I’m sure), the fifth-year pro isn’t the best quarterback in the league – or anywhere close to it, for that matter. (Take a look at his QB rating against some of the better defenses last season.) In no way am I suggesting that he’ll never become a top quarterback, but his assertion that he is there now is ridiculous. After their Week 9 debacle against the Seahawks in which , the Ravens decided less of Flacco and more of Ray Rice was a good thing and were rewarded with a 7-2 finish to the season. One of the big factors in that late-season success: Flacco did not attempt more than 36 passes over his team’s final nine games after having done so five times over the first nine weeks. While half a season is still a relatively small sample size in the overall scheme of things, don’t look for OC Cam Cameron to go away from Rice as the centerpiece of the offense again anytime soon since it seems to upset his teammates and fantasy owners alike every time he does – as it should. The other major consideration is that with its loss of DE/LB Terrell Suggs, Baltimore may want to try even harder to play ball-control. Torrey Smith’s arrival on the scene last year was a pleasant surprise and he has emerged as the best fantasy WR option this team has, although the addition of another deep threat (Jacoby Jones) should help Anquan Boldin squeeze out another quality year or two as the main option in the slot. At TE, the Ravens own one of the league’s better two-man tight end tandems in Ed Dickson and Dennis Pitta.

Matchup analysis: In a theme that figures to be repeated several times throughout this piece, the AFC North is a meat grinder of a division. While almost every other division in the league seems to have an offensive juggernaut, this one has a litany of teams that run the ball and play solid defense. Throw in the first-place schedule the Ravens face along with four games against the NFC East and perhaps no team has a more difficult schedule as a whole than Baltimore. The passing-game matchups are brutal as the case could be made that five of the seven pre-bye contests feature teams with potentially elite defenses (Philadelphia and Houston), lockdown cornerbacks attached to good schemes (Joe Haden with Cleveland, Brandon Flowers with Kansas City) or a defense that should finally be able to play up to its potential now with a wealth of talent in the secondary (Dallas) to complement one of the league’s best pass rushers in DeMarcus Ware. They face the Browns coming out of the bye and it really doesn’t get any easier, which is a big reason why Smith is a poor bet to experience any kind of dramatic increase over last season. (In fact, I’m pretty sure my projection for him is his absolute ceiling.) However, just because I don’t see Smith posting huge numbers doesn’t mean he doesn’t have to be accounted for, so look for just about everyone else to post healthy reception totals as a result. When compared to the passing game, Rice’s matchup line looks relatively tame, but much of the credit for that goes to his all-around game. (Take a look at Bernard Pierce’s matchup line in case you want to know how difficult things could be for Rice if he was just an average back.) While the fantasy playoff schedule isn’t ideal for Rice, it is hardly insurmountable for a player of his talents; with his contract situation resolved, he is still unquestionably a top-three pick in fantasy.

 Cincinnati Bengals
Pos Player Age PPR Aver NPPR Aver PPR Non Totals 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
BAL CLE WAS JAX MIA CLE PIT bye DEN NYG KC OAK SD DAL PHI PIT
QB Andy Dalton 24 17.3 17.3 259.6 259.6 3590 245 180 255 260 235 260 215 225 280 220 275 255 250 225 210
TD 21 1 1 2 2 2 0 1 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 2
INT 14 2 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 2 2
Ru Yards 120 15 15 5 5 0 10 5 15 10 10 5 0 10 10 5
Ru TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
RB BenJarvus Green-Ellis 27 9.9 8.9 148 134 830 45 70 50 65 70 55 30 65 35 65 75 60 50 60 35
Ru TD 7 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0
Re Yards 90 5 0 10 15 0 15 0 0 0 15 0 10 10 10 0
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 14 1 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 3 0
RB Bernard Scott 29 7.5 6.2 104.5 86.5 555 35 40 20 15 55 50 30 40 75 45 35 INJ 45 50 20
Ru TD 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 INJ 1 0 0
Re Yards 130 15 0 5 10 5 15 0 15 0 20 10 INJ 15 10 10
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ 0 0 0
Rec 18 2 0 1 2 1 2 0 2 0 2 1 INJ 2 2 1
RB Brian Leonard 28 3.8 2 57.5 30.5 125 10 5 0 10 15 0 15 5 0 10 15 25 0 5 10
Ru TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Re Yards 180 15 5 5 0 20 10 15 20 15 0 10 20 15 20 10
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 27 2 1 1 0 3 2 2 3 2 0 1 3 2 3 2
WR A.J. Green 24 16.5 11.4 247 171 1110 50 75 105 85 65 45 70 45 120 75 115 75 50 55 80
Re TD 10 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1
Rec 76 4 6 7 6 4 3 4 3 8 6 6 5 3 4 7
WR Mohamed Sanu 23 8.8 5.2 114 67 490 35 30 25 30 50 40 45 65 20 30 45 INJ INJ 35 40
Re TD 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 INJ INJ 0 1
Rec 47 4 3 2 3 5 3 4 5 2 3 5 INJ INJ 4 4
WR Jordan Shipley 26 5.4 3.2 81.5 47.5 415 20 15 45 20 30 45 10 40 35 30 15 35 40 10 25
Re TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Rec 34 2 1 3 2 2 3 1 3 2 3 1 4 4 1 2
WR Brandon Tate 24 2 1.3 30 19 190 20 0 15 10 0 30 0 0 40 20 0 20 35 0 0
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 11 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 0
TE Jermaine Gresham 24 12.3 7.9 184 118 760 50 55 35 75 55 45 50 35 50 30 60 70 60 55 35
Re TD 7 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0
Rec 66 4 5 3 7 4 3 4 3 5 3 6 5 6 5 3
TE Orson Charles 21 2.1 1.1 32 16 160 10 0 10 0 10 15 25 5 0 0 20 15 10 30 10
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 16 1 0 1 0 1 2 3 1 0 0 2 1 1 2 1

General overview: Coming off a season in which the Bengals managed to make the playoffs with a rookie quarterback, a rookie receiver and first-year play-caller in an offensive attack led by Cedric Benson, the arrow for this offense has to be pointing up, right? There’s no question A.J. Green is the real deal, but Cincinnati doesn’t appear ready yet to sacrifice its identity as a running team anytime soon despite the fact that its two best playmakers are in the passing game – Green and Jermaine Gresham. (And let’s not even get into the complete misuse of Gresham to this point in his career right now…) To their credit, the Bengals attacked their receiver position in the offseason and should have no shortage of young talent on the roster for years to come. Rookie Mohamed Sanu looks to be the favorite to start opposite Green for now, but the team has praised the work of Brandon Tate and Armon Binns this spring and summer. Throughout the offseason, we have consistently heard that Cincinnati intends on giving Bernard Scott his fair share of playing time for the first time in his career, which flies in the face of HC Marvin Lewis’ assertion that new RB BenJarvus Green-Ellis is a “three-down back” – something the coach said shortly after signing the former Patriot. Not only has the “Law Firm” rarely ever shown he should be on the field in passing situations, but both Scott and Brian Leonard are bigger threats as receivers anyway. As a result, this has the look of a 50-35-15 backfield split with Scott relieving BJGE once about every three series and sharing some of the work in the passing game with Leonard.

Matchup analysis: In order for the “Law Firm” to recoup some of the fantasy value he had during his final two years with the Patriots, he needed to be featured in Cincy since he won’t have the same kind of regular access to the end zone that he did in New England. That doesn’t appear to be happening here and, with his matchups, he looks to be a poor bet to reach double-digit touchdowns for the third straight season. (If he has one saving grace, however, it is that he is one of the best goal-line backs in the league.) Each year, the 3-4 games during the fantasy season against the Steelers and Ravens don’t come as a surprise, but there just isn’t much reason for optimism in this backfield this year with four more games against the improved defenses of the NFC East and a few potentially good offensive teams from the AFC West at the end of the schedule that may force Cincinnati to abandon the run. Green-Ellis’ best shot at fantasy value early are in Weeks 2, 5 and 6; after the break, he’s going to need help. Scott offers big-play potential, but he’s going to be hard-pressed to make a huge difference in fantasy with a ceiling of roughly 150 touches, most of which figure to be rushing attempts. In the passing game, Green also has his work cut out for him against a number of the league’s top corners and/or pass defenses, but proved last season that he is already up to the challenge in that regard. I doubt the same can be said about any of the other aforementioned receivers (Sanu, Jordan Shipley, Tate or Binns) and their ability to produce consistently against the highest level of competition, which should lead to an increased reliance on Gresham. As a result of the challenging defenses the Bengals should expect to see this year, don’t be surprised to see a bit of a “sophomore slump” from Andy Dalton. While his likely regression will probably be attributed to defenses “figuring him out”, he will almost certainly be able to place the bulk of the blame in a running game that may not strike fear into many opponents and a group of secondary receivers (of course, not including Green) too young to overcome it.

 Cleveland Browns
Pos Player Age PPR Aver NPPR Aver PPR Non Totals 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
PHI CIN BUF BAL NYG CIN IND SD BAL bye DAL PIT OAK KC WAS DEN
QB Brandon Weeden 28 13.4 13.4 188.1 188.1 3190 200 215 240 210 255 285 230 285 190 90 INJ 275 215 270 230
TD 14 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 INJ 1 1 2 0
INT 15 3 1 1 1 2 0 0 2 1 0 INJ 0 2 0 2
Ru Yards 65 0 0 5 5 10 5 0 10 0 0 INJ 5 10 5 10
Ru TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ 0 0 0 0
QB Seneca Wallace 32 12.1 12.1 24.2 24.2 330 130 200
TD 2 2 0
INT 2 1 1
Ru Yards 30 20 10
Ru TD 0 0 0
RB Trent Richardson 22 15.7 13.4 220 187 1165 85 100 90 35 INJ 75 150 80 60 80 45 120 75 80 90
Ru TD 8 1 1 0 0 INJ 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1
Re Yards 225 25 10 20 20 INJ 10 0 10 15 30 15 10 25 10 25
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 INJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 33 3 2 3 3 INJ 2 0 1 3 4 3 1 3 1 4
RB Brandon Jackson 26 5.4 3.3 65 40 170 15 15 10 10 25 10 10 15 10 20 15 15 INJ INJ INJ
Ru TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ INJ
Re Yards 170 15 10 0 10 40 15 20 5 5 10 5 35 INJ INJ INJ
Re TD 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ INJ
Rec 25 2 2 0 1 5 2 3 1 1 2 1 5 INJ INJ INJ
RB Montario Hardesty 25 2.5 2.1 27.5 23.5 215 10 0 15 10 55 15 INJ INJ INJ INJ 10 10 20 30 40
Ru TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ INJ INJ 0 0 0 0 0
Re Yards 20 0 0 0 0 15 0 INJ INJ INJ INJ 0 0 5 0 0
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ INJ INJ 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 INJ INJ INJ INJ 0 0 1 0 0
WR Greg Little 23 12.8 8 192 120 900 40 55 80 45 70 75 85 65 40 45 65 105 30 70 30
Re TD 5 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0
Rec 72 4 6 5 4 6 5 7 5 3 4 4 8 3 6 2
WR Mohamed Massaquoi 25 7.2 4.5 107.5 67.5 555 25 45 40 20 40 70 30 85 40 20 15 25 40 25 35
Re TD 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 40 2 3 3 1 3 5 2 4 4 2 1 2 3 2 3
WR Travis Benjamin 22 3.5 2.1 49 29 290 0 20 0 INJ 15 30 30 25 35 10 30 0 15 35 45
Re TD 0 0 0 0 INJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 20 0 2 0 INJ 1 2 3 1 2 1 2 0 1 2 3
WR Josh Gordon 21 5.4 3.5 81 53 410 0 0 10 25 15 25 15 0 30 65 20 50 60 50 45
Re TD 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
Rec 28 0 0 1 2 1 2 1 0 2 3 1 4 4 4 3
TE Ben Watson 31 8.8 5.2 114.5 67.5 495 30 40 55 35 40 60 25 65 15 INJ INJ 35 25 50 20
Re TD 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 INJ INJ 0 0 1 0
Rec 47 3 3 5 3 4 6 3 6 2 INJ INJ 3 3 4 2
TE Evan Moore 27 5.3 3.3 74 46 280 20 10 35 25 10 INJ 25 30 5 40 30 10 15 20 5
Re TD 3 1 0 1 0 0 INJ 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 28 2 1 3 2 1 INJ 2 3 1 4 3 1 2 2 1

General overview: If team president Mike Holmgren and everyone under his direction are truly on the hot seat this year, they certainly cannot be accused of playing things conservatively. This offense has undergone a major facelift and has improved its talent base dramatically. The main question is whether or not HC Pat Shurmur be around to see it through. For the foreseeable future, the offense will revolve around the talents of Trent Richardson, who is one of the better running back prospects to come out in recent years. In a league where 300-touch RBs are a dying breed, Richardson appears to be a pretty good bet to hit that mark a few times over the next 4-5 years. With a legitimate big-play threat like Richardson behind him, fellow rookie Brandon Weeden will have more of a shot at taking quality shots down the field than Colt McCoy ever did. Certainly, a big part of Cleveland’s small-ball approach with McCoy was his limited arm strength, but another key reason was the lack of receivers who could actually threaten a defense deep. Speaking of such receivers, the Browns gave away their second-round pick in 2013 for Josh Gordon, the prize of the supplemental draft. Like Greg Little (6-2, 220), Gordon (6-4, 220) gives the Browns another big receiver that teams usually want in the West Coast offense. And file TE Jordan Cameron’s name away as he may get a chance to flash this season with some question marks ahead of him on the depth chart. With improvements also made on the offensive line, the future is brighter now (for fans and fantasy owners) than it has been in some time for Cleveland. Whether or not the team makes enough tangible progress this season is another question.

Matchup analysis: With a fair amount of buzz coming out of Cleveland that Brandon Jackson will take some or most of the passing-down work, it would be a minor shock if Richardson hasn’t already assumed that role early in the season. Like the back he has been compared to repeatedly throughout the offseason – Adrian Peterson – Richardson won’t be matchup-proof simply because he won’t likely be given the opportunity to catch 40-50 balls right away like the Ray Rices, Arian Fosters and LeSean McCoys of the world. But with a solid run-blocking line in front of him and commitment to him as the centerpiece of this offense, only a lackluster showing by the Browns’ defense (i.e. falling behind by multiple scores early in games) or injury figure to keep Richardson from producing like a low-end RB1 right away. The first half of the schedule isn’t particularly easy, but for someone with his combination of talent and expected workload, it also isn’t overly daunting either. The hardest stretch appears to be the five-week period in the two weeks before and after the bye. The payoff for his owners should come after that during the fantasy playoffs. I’m not nearly as optimistic about the passing game, however, even though I do expect Little to build on a 61-catch rookie season. Little has reportedly made huge strides this offseason and will benefit from the talent upgrades around him, including a more accurate and stronger-armed quarterback. With so many first- and second-year players expected to be playing key roles, it wouldn’t be fair to expect Weeden to pull an Andy Dalton and push this team into the playoffs with a positive TD-to-INT ratio. In three of his first five games, Weeden will be asked to face some of the teams that should have the best pass rushes in the game this year. In the other two games, he must face Cincinnati and Baltimore on the road. Even though I did highlight two green matchups for Weeden, I expect HC Chuck Pagano to have his Colts’ defense overachieving by the middle part of the season and HC Dennis Allen to have his Raiders’ secondary playing well by the time the Browns visit.

 Pittsburgh Steelers
Pos Player Age PPR Aver NPPR Aver PPR Non Totals 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
DEN NYJ OAK bye PHI TEN CIN WAS NYG KC BAL CLE BAL SD DAL CIN
QB Ben Roethlisberger 30 17.8 17.8 266.9 266.9 3710 265 215 255 235 280 270 175 280 225 270 270 205 305 275 185
TD 22 2 1 1 1 3 3 1 2 0 1 2 1 3 1 0
INT 14 2 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 2 1 0 1
Ru Yards 85 5 5 0 15 5 0 10 10 5 0 0 10 5 0 15
Ru TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
QB Byron Leftwich 32 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 80 80
TD 0 0
INT 0 0
Ru Yards 0 0
Ru TD 0 0
RB Rashard Mendenhall 25 6.2 5.2 55.5 46.5 275 PUP PUP PUP PUP PUP PUP 20 10 10 20 50 35 55 25 50
Ru TD 2 PUP PUP PUP PUP PUP PUP 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Re Yards 70 PUP PUP PUP PUP PUP PUP 5 15 10 0 15 10 5 0 10
Re TD 0 PUP PUP PUP PUP PUP PUP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 9 PUP PUP PUP PUP PUP PUP 1 2 1 0 2 1 1 0 1
RB Isaac Redman 27 11.1 9.8 166 147 945 90 80 115 70 60 75 65 45 90 35 50 35 40 55 40
Ru TD 7 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1
Re Yards 105 15 15 0 10 5 15 15 10 0 5 5 0 10 0 0
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 19 2 3 0 2 1 3 2 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 0
RB Jonathan Dwyer 23 5.1 4.8 50.5 47.5 340 40 25 50 45 65 20 25 35 20 15 INJ INJ INJ INJ INJ
Ru TD 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 INJ INJ INJ INJ INJ
Re Yards 15 10 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ INJ INJ INJ
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ INJ INJ INJ
Rec 3 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ INJ INJ INJ
RB Chris Rainey 24 5.3 3.3 68.5 43.5 140 10 10 5 20 15 INJ INJ 5 10 0 35 0 0 15 15
Ru TD 1 0 0 0 1 0 INJ INJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Re Yards 235 35 0 20 25 20 INJ INJ 15 25 15 20 0 35 10 15
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 25 3 0 2 2 2 INJ INJ 2 3 3 2 0 3 2 1
WR Mike Wallace 26 14.2 10 213 150 1080 35 40 105 60 135 90 75 80 40 50 50 70 115 80 55
Re TD 7 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Rec 63 2 3 5 4 5 6 4 3 4 4 3 5 5 6 4
WR Antonio Brown 24 13.4 8.6 200.5 128.5 985 60 50 70 40 75 80 80 45 100 65 90 45 85 60 40
Re TD 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0
Rec 72 5 4 5 3 6 6 5 4 6 5 7 3 5 4 4
WR Emmanuel Sanders 25 6.5 4 78.5 48.5 365 50 40 20 25 INJ INJ INJ 50 5 30 25 40 10 40 30
Re TD 2 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ INJ 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
Rec 30 4 3 2 2 INJ INJ INJ 4 1 2 2 3 1 3 3
WR Jerricho Cotchery 30 4.5 2.9 68 43 310 25 35 0 25 15 35 30 10 25 40 0 15 15 25 15
Re TD 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 25 2 2 0 2 2 4 2 1 2 2 0 1 2 2 1
TE Heath Miller 29 9.4 5.8 141 87 570 25 35 40 45 30 45 35 55 15 65 55 25 30 50 20
Re TD 5 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Rec 54 2 5 4 5 3 4 3 5 1 5 6 2 3 4 2

General overview: Where to begin…ex-OC Bruce Arians was essentially shown the door, opening the door for new OC Todd Haley to take over. Haley has promised a stronger commitment to the running game with more high-percentage passing, but the talent on the roster (at least when it is healthy or not taking part in offseason workouts) suggests this is still a big-play offense that needs to ride Ben Roethlisberger’s arm. It is anyone’s guess when WR Mike Wallace will report to the team, but as of now, he doesn’t appear to be a threat to miss much – if any – training camp. The circumstances are much different for Rashard Mendenhall, who has either “healed wonderfully” (if you believe him) or a candidate for the PUP list (if you believe modern medicine) following his ACL tear on New Year’s Day last season. The commitment to the running game would have made more sense with a healthy Mendenhall, so there is reason to be skeptical about how much this offense is really changing. For what it is worth, Haley has directed a successful running attack as a head coach in Kansas City and a prolific passing attack as a play-caller in Arizona. One player that has caught Haley’s eye is TE Heath Miller, who is the most complete TE he has worked with since Jason Witten more than five years ago. It is also worth noting that Haley found another gadget player to give defenses fits in rookie Chris Rainey. While he cannot serve as a change-of-pace or emergency running back like former Haley protégé Dexter McCluster nor is he another hybrid player like Percy Harvin, Rainey is every bit as explosive – if not more so – than either player. Like McCluster, he’ll probably be just on the cusp of fantasy relevancy but his inconsistent touches will probably keep him from being a bench-worthy fantasy property.

Matchup analysis: Wallace had better be ready to hit the ground running when he reports because he could get off to a rather poor start against the likes of Champ Bailey and Darrelle Revis in Weeks 1-2. He may find refuge against the Raiders in Week 3, but the Steelers have an early bye in Week 4 and face the venerable Eagles’ secondary the following week. It may be at that point fantasy owners want to trade for him since he has “winnable” fantasy matchups in eight of the final 12 games of the fantasy season. The argument could be made that a safer receiver might be teammate Antonio Brown since he obviously benefits from all the attention Wallace commands. After all, Brown will face lesser coverage more regularly and has already earned the respect of Roethlisberger. Whereas Wallace could see shadow coverage at various points in nearly half of his games in 2012, Brown should have it relatively easy by comparison. Assuming Mendenhall begins the season on the PUP list, this is where the running game gets interesting. While the quarterbacks and receivers could struggle to get going early with some difficult matchups, the same is unlikely to be said about the ground game led by Isaac Redman. Only the Jets strike me as a possible tough matchup out of the first six opponents and even they need to make a great deal of improvement on their lackluster showing in 2011. With Mendenhall likely to return about the time that “easy” stretch comes to an end and the strong possibility that a run of tougher defenses is about to begin, it may not be a bad idea to shop Redman at that time. It’s also entirely possible that we know as much now as we will in Week 7 or 8 about whether Redman will have grabbed ahold of the feature-back role or if Pittsburgh will force the two to work in tandem. Worse yet, there is always the possibility that a motivated Jonathan Dwyer will force his way into the conversation. And if any or all of that comes to fruition, it is too bad since Pittsburgh addressed its offensive line this offseason and has provided fantasy owners with a consistent RB2 option for several years now.

NFC NORTH

 Chicago Bears
Pos Player Age PPR Aver NPPR Aver PPR Non Totals 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
IND GB STL DAL JAX bye DET CAR TEN HOU SF MIN SEA MIN GB ARI
QB Jay Cutler 29 19.6 19.6 293.8 293.8 3770 270 365 210 270 260 340 225 275 145 210 310 175 215 260 240
TD 24 2 3 1 3 0 3 1 2 0 1 2 1 2 1 2
INT 15 1 2 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 2 0 2 2 0 0
Ru Yards 170 5 25 10 15 10 15 0 10 15 10 5 20 20 10 0
Ru TD 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
RB Matt Forte 26 16 12.5 240 187 1065 80 70 110 65 70 110 125 50 65 45 40 55 85 30 65
Ru TD 4 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Re Yards 445 35 50 15 25 10 30 55 20 15 20 55 15 40 45 15
Re TD 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Rec 53 4 6 2 3 2 4 5 3 2 3 6 2 4 5 2
RB Michael Bush 28 9.2 7.7 137.5 115.5 570 40 35 55 40 25 15 50 35 25 35 60 35 35 50 35
Ru TD 7 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Re Yards 165 10 25 10 5 25 0 10 15 5 10 0 10 10 20 10
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 22 2 3 1 1 3 0 1 2 1 1 0 1 2 3 1
WR Brandon Marshall 28 16.6 10.8 248.5 162.5 1145 80 120 45 85 65 150 55 85 35 55 80 70 50 100 70
Re TD 8 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Rec 86 7 8 4 6 5 11 5 7 3 4 6 5 4 6 5
WR Alshon Jeffery 22 7.5 4.9 112.5 73.5 555 35 40 20 10 40 55 40 45 20 50 80 15 45 25 35
Re TD 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Rec 39 2 1 2 1 3 4 4 3 2 5 4 1 3 2 2
WR Earl Bennett 25 8 4.5 103.5 58.5 465 40 55 30 50 45 30 0 50 40 INJ INJ 35 25 25 40
Re TD 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ 0 0 0 1
Rec 45 4 5 3 4 5 3 0 4 5 INJ INJ 3 2 3 4
WR Devin Hester 29 4.7 3 70 45 390 25 30 40 70 20 55 30 0 0 35 55 0 0 0 30
Re TD 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 25 2 3 2 4 2 4 3 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 1
TE Kellen Davis 26 9.6 6.1 144 92 560 45 40 50 25 40 15 35 60 30 40 40 20 45 45 30
Re TD 6 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
Rec 52 4 3 4 2 3 2 3 5 4 4 3 2 5 5 3

General overview: It took new GM Phil Emery one offseason to do what his predecessor had trouble doing in 11 years: find a competent receiver to give his quarterback a chance at fielding a respectable passing attack that forces defenses to think about someone else besides Matt Forte. It’s not like Brandon Marshall comes without risk – there’s a reason Chicago only had to surrender two third-rounders to get a Pro Bowl talent like him – but to secure a receiver who commands as much attention as he does is a coup at that price. The fact that he also has a history with QB Jay Cutler is just an incredible bonus. As such, the term “dynamic offense” has a chance to be associated with this offense for the first time in years. Chicago also took another chance on a second-round receiver in Alshon Jeffery, who could quickly become one of the better deep threats in the league if he decides another 25-pound weight gain is not in his best professional interest. And the improvements didn’t just at receiver; Emery signed Michael Bush to resume the same kind of goal-line/change-of-pace role he had in Oakland, replacing the mostly ineffective Marion Barber. Last but not least, let’s not forget my obligatory mention of Mike Martz, who was “allowed” to retire so the Bears could turn the offense over to new OC Mike Tice and QB coach/passing-game coordinator Jeremy Bates, who knows the Cutler-Marshall duo from his time in Denver under then-HC Mike Shanahan. The departure of Martz and promotion of Tice means that the tight end is now an option in the passing game. While Martz wasn’t hiding a Vernon Davis-like talent in Chicago, Kellen Davis was an incredibly underused option in the passing game. I am very confident his will be one name owners will want to get to know early in the season.

Matchup analysis: With the aforementioned personnel upgrades and perhaps the softest slate of matchups I have seen to this point (relative to the talent on the offense), Cutler is going to have his best shot at 4,000+ yards and 25+ TDs since posting the best fantasy season of his career in 2008 – his final season as a Bronco when Bates was his position coach. Of the Bears’ first eight games, only the Rams’ Cortland Finnegan, the Cowboys’ Morris Claiborne and the Jaguars’ Derek Cox have the size and/or feistiness to challenge Marshall. Of those three, only Finnegan (the smallest but feistiest of the bunch) is likely to shadow him. Marshall – and by extension, Cutler – could have a rough second half if Jeffery doesn’t develop at the rate the Bears want him to since the elite defenses of the Niners and Texans are followed by three games against the Vikings (who have a very capable CB with size to frustrate Marshall in Chris Cook) and Seahawks, who start a pair of cornerbacks in 6-3 Richard Sherman and 6-4 Brandon Browner that proved their worth in 2011. In Weeks 15-16, Chicago must face what should be an improved Packers secondary and Marshall will likely have a “shadow date” the next week with Arizona’s Patrick Peterson, who we should expect to be dramatically better as a cover CB at the end of his second season than he was as a rookie. Shifting to the running game, a fast start can be expected with the likes of the Colts and Rams in September and the Lions, Panthers and Titans in the three weeks following the bye. While the all-around game of Forte and goal-line opportunities Bush will have in this offense should keep them both relevant in fantasy, Week 9 may be a good time to sell both players as Houston, San Francisco, Seattle, Green Bay and Arizona all have the personnel necessary to wreak havoc on the Bears’ rushing attack.

 Detroit Lions
Pos Player Age PPR Aver NPPR Aver PPR Non Totals 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
STL SF TEN MIN bye PHI CHI SEA JAX MIN GB HOU IND GB ARI ATL
QB Matthew Stafford 24 25.7 25.7 385.8 385.8 4770 350 315 435 335 315 295 310 250 270 380 270 390 275 350 230
TD 36 4 1 4 2 1 2 2 2 2 3 2 5 2 2 2
INT 14 0 1 2 0 3 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 2
Ru Yards 70 0 10 0 0 5 5 0 0 5 15 20 0 10 0 0
Ru TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RB Jahvid Best 23 15.2 11.1 182 133 595 70 25 45 35 55 65 20 INJ INJ INJ 30 125 45 45 35
Ru TD 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 INJ INJ INJ 0 1 0 0 0
Re Yards 435 40 55 35 60 20 40 15 INJ INJ INJ 40 15 50 40 25
Re TD 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ INJ 0 0 1 0 0
Rec 49 4 6 3 6 4 5 1 INJ INJ INJ 5 2 5 5 3
RB Mikel Leshoure 22 8.1 7.1 80.5 70.5 410 SUS SUS 25 40 50 30 25 35 60 70 45 30 INJ INJ INJ
Ru TD 4 SUS SUS 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 INJ INJ INJ
Re Yards 55 SUS SUS 0 5 10 0 5 15 5 15 0 0 INJ INJ INJ
Re TD 0 SUS SUS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ INJ
Rec 10 SUS SUS 0 1 1 0 1 2 1 3 1 0 INJ INJ INJ
RB Kevin Smith 25 6.1 4.7 79.5 60.5 290 35 30 15 10 0 15 35 55 20 INJ INJ 10 30 15 20
Ru TD 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ 0 1 1 0
Re Yards 135 15 5 5 10 0 0 20 25 15 INJ INJ 0 15 10 15
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ 0 0 0 0
Rec 19 2 1 1 1 0 0 2 4 2 INJ INJ 0 3 1 2
WR Calvin Johnson 26 21.4 15.1 321.5 226.5 1485 80 115 165 120 80 115 90 55 70 130 65 180 65 110 45
Re TD 13 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 3 0 2 0
Rec 95 5 8 11 7 7 6 8 4 5 8 5 7 4 6 4
WR Nate Burleson 31 8.4 5 125.5 74.5 565 35 25 50 30 40 40 50 65 30 50 30 40 20 25 35
Re TD 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 51 3 2 4 3 3 4 5 6 3 5 2 4 2 2 3
WR Titus Young 23 12.4 8.3 185.5 124.5 825 110 30 80 40 60 35 70 40 75 55 20 80 45 70 15
Re TD 7 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0
Rec 61 4 3 4 4 6 3 6 4 7 4 2 3 4 6 1
WR Ryan Broyles 24 5.5 3.4 66.5 40.5 285 10 20 25 15 30 INJ INJ INJ 10 30 35 15 30 40 25
Re TD 2 0 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ INJ 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Rec 26 1 2 2 1 2 INJ INJ INJ 1 3 3 2 3 4 2
TE Brandon Pettigrew 27 11.9 7.2 179 108 720 50 50 35 55 65 35 60 35 20 80 45 60 35 45 50
Re TD 6 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1
Rec 71 5 7 4 5 7 3 6 3 2 8 4 5 3 4 5
TE Tony Scheffler 29 4.5 3 67.5 44.5 265 10 15 40 0 10 30 0 15 45 20 35 0 15 10 20
Re TD 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
Rec 23 1 2 3 0 1 2 0 1 4 2 3 0 1 1 2

General overview: No team carried the flag for the passing game last year quite like the Lions, attempting a league-high 666 passes. Naturally, Detroit poured even more resources into its passing game through the draft by adding a prolific slot receiver (Ryan Broyles) to what is already an incredible offensive machine. While it could be argued that the selection of OT Riley Reiff was made to address the running game, the Lions have given no indication – and for good reason – they want to move to a more balanced offense. And it is hard to argue the point since the combination of Matthew Stafford and Calvin Johnson is as good as there is in the game right now. Even though Titus Young is just entering his second season, he appears to be primed to overtake Nate Burleson as a starter at some point this season and enjoy his breakout season. There is also Brandon Pettigrew, who offers virtually no playmaking ability but is clearly a safety option for Stafford that benefits greatly from the fact that no defense can afford to commit resources to him when Johnson and Young are stretching defenses outside the numbers. At this point, the running game would be happy if it could simply keep one quality running back healthy (or out of trouble) at all times. The hope is someday that Jahvid Best can stay healthy long enough to be this offense’s Reggie Bush while Mikel LeShoure attempts to pound away with 12-15 “power runs” each game, similar to what the Saints hope to do with Mark Ingram.

Matchup analysis: For most of the NFL, the Lions’ schedule would pose a difficult challenge. Yes, Stafford and Johnson will have their down weeks from time to time, but there are only a few matchups that should truly give owners pause this season despite the plethora of yellow above. For Johnson, it may be difficult for him to find the end zone against the Niners (Week 2) and Falcons (Week 16). But outside of that, his size, speed and leaping ability make it next to impossible for even the best cover corners on the schedule to match up with him. Because of the sheer number of other weapons he has – along with Johnson – Stafford is in a similar spot as Johnson with no opponent possessing enough Pro Bowl-caliber defenders to cover every single threat the Lions have. Because it is quite likely the Lions pass the ball twice as much as they run it again this season, the combination of Best, LeShoure and Kevin Smith are a bit harder to plan for in 2012. I expect LeShoure to stick to the ground game with Best taking fewer carries and the majority of the work in the passing game, meaning his slate starts off nicely against three beatable defenses after his suspension ends but it quickly turns difficult with just 1-2 “easy” matchups the rest of the way. With Detroit so committed to the pass, it may be advantageous for LeShoure’s owners to trade him right after the bye (unless, of course, those same owners think LeShoure will be the last man standing in this backfield). The only really tough fantasy calls I see for Best (and Smith if/when Best is out) are against the Niners and Falcons – two teams with enough talent across the board on defense and enough of a ball-control mentality on offense to stymie the Lions’ potent attack to some degree.

 Green Bay Packers
Pos Player Age PPR Aver NPPR Aver PPR Non Totals 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
SF CHI SEA NO IND HOU STL JAX ARI bye DET NYG MIN DET CHI TEN
QB Aaron Rodgers 28 31.6 31.6 474.6 474.6 4715 285 330 285 405 365 260 255 290 340 360 300 305 385 280 270
TD 43 2 3 2 4 4 1 3 3 2 4 2 4 3 3 3
INT 7 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
Ru Yards 240 20 15 25 0 10 35 15 5 20 10 35 5 15 10 20
Ru TD 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
QB Graham Harrell 2 2 6.1 6.1 140 20 35 85
TD 0 0 0 0
INT 0 0 0 0
Ru Yards 5 0 0 5
Ru TD 0 0 0 0
RB James Starks 26 13.8 11.7 179.5 152.5 915 50 70 65 75 90 55 80 55 65 110 50 INJ INJ 65 85
Ru TD 6 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 INJ INJ 0 1
Re Yards 190 20 10 15 30 10 15 20 5 15 10 15 INJ INJ 10 15
Re TD 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ 0 0
Rec 27 3 2 1 3 2 3 2 1 2 1 2 INJ INJ 2 3
RB Alex Green 24 6.4 4.8 96.5 71.5 490 25 20 20 15 30 15 45 30 20 15 30 60 70 50 45
Ru TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Re Yards 165 10 15 0 10 10 15 5 15 10 20 10 20 15 5 5
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 25 2 2 0 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 2 2 2 1
RB Brandon Saine 23 2.3 1.1 34 16 60 5 0 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 15 15 0 0
Ru TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Re Yards 100 0 5 10 5 0 20 0 10 10 0 5 15 10 0 10
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 18 0 1 2 1 0 3 0 1 2 0 1 3 2 0 2
RB John Kuhn 29 3.3 2.5 50 38 70 10 5 10 5 0 0 5 0 0 10 5 0 5 5 10
Ru TD 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Re Yards 70 5 0 5 5 0 10 0 5 5 10 5 0 10 5 5
Re TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 12 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 1 0 1 1 1
WR Greg Jennings 28 16.3 11.3 244 169 1090 65 90 60 85 75 25 50 55 80 115 70 45 90 80 105
Re TD 10 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 2
Rec 75 5 7 5 6 6 2 3 4 6 6 5 4 5 4 7
WR Jordy Nelson 27 14.7 10.3 220 154 1060 40 55 45 70 135 60 85 30 100 35 45 115 110 80 55
Re TD 8 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0
Rec 66 3 4 4 4 7 5 6 3 4 4 3 6 5 4 4
WR Donald Driver 37 5.4 3.6 81 54 300 25 0 35 20 10 30 0 65 15 20 0 10 35 10 25
Re TD 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Rec 27 2 0 3 2 1 3 0 5 2 2 0 1 3 1 2
WR Randall Cobb 22 8.2 5.6 123.5 84.5 605 25 50 70 45 20 45 25 10 40 30 30 75 50 40 50
Re TD 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
Rec 39 1 2 3 3 2 2 2 1 3 4 2 5 3 3 3
WR James Jones 27 5.4 3.9 81 59 350 30 25 0 65 20 0 35 15 15 70 35 0 20 0 20
Re TD 4 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 22 1 3 0 3 1 0 2 2 1 4 2 0 2 0 1
TE Jermichael Finley 25 13.5 9 202.5 134.5 865 65 75 45 60 70 40 45 80 50 50 75 60 45 40 65
Re TD 8 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0
Rec 68 4 5 3 5 4 3 4 7 3 5 6 5 4 4 6

General overview: It goes without saying that Aaron Rodgers’ unmatched combination of agility and accuracy is the straw that stirs the Packers’ drink, although it certainly helps the cause to have such a deep and talented receiving corps. After a forgettable 2011, don’t be a bit surprised if Jermichael Finley finally takes the leap many expected him to make last year into the elite group of tight ends. With a quarterback like Rodgers who will sometimes find 10-11 different receivers during the course of a game, Finley isn’t likely to challenge the Grahams and Gronkowskis of the world, but he sure could make a run at them if he simply returns to form and stays healthy. Greg Jennings is the one constant in the passing attack, yet always seems a bit undervalued on draft day – he’s a solid bet for 70-75 catches, 1,000 yards and 8-10 scores for the next 2-3 years at least. As memorable as Jordy Nelson’s season was last year, it wouldn’t be surprising to see Randall Cobb start eating into Nelson’s production when the fantasy playoffs roll around if/once he overtakes Donald Driver. With the way Rodgers carries the offense on his shoulders, it is easy to forget the Packers also have a bit of a ground game, that is, outside of his scrambles. And with any luck, owners may get their wish for another feature back if James Starks can stay healthy. With Alex Green returning from an ACL injury suffered during the middle of his rookie season last year and Brandon Saine – who will likely be limited mostly to third-down duty – the coast is clear for Starks to give the Packers their first reliable fantasy starter at RB since 2009.

Matchup analysis: A quarterback of Rodgers’ incredible all-around talent does not need any help from the people who put together the schedule, but it sure looks like he got it here. While the schedule makers are not responsible for what divisions Green Bay must play each year, they can control the fact that three of the final four games the Packers play during the fantasy season will be at home against teams that figure to field some of the poorer pass defenses in the league. He could easily live up to my six-game post-bye projection of 1,890 yards and 19 touchdowns. Much like Rodgers, Jennings’ difficult matchups are front-loaded, but the combination of Rodgers’ accuracy and the trust he has in Jennings overcomes all but the most elite cornerbacks in the league. Nelson’s chances to repeat his monster 2011 appear strong with the lack of red and yellow on his schedule, but his unsustainable peripherals (such as his 22.06% touchdown rate and his 71.4% catch rate on balls thrown more than 20 yards down the field) suggest a regression to the mean is likely in store. He benefited greatly from a number of weak pass defenses last season, especially over the final two weeks of the regular season when he accumulated over 21% of his yards and 33% of his touchdowns once Jennings was lost for the remainder of the regular season. Some of the Nelson’s lost production should fall into Finley’s lap. In some of the games I re-watched during the offseason, Finley was targeted relentlessly when defenses played zone – a trend I expect opponents to use a lot this season against the Packers. I think it is a stretch to say Finley even has four yellow matchups this season – his immediate fantasy future looks bright. The same thing can be said about Starks if he can stay healthy. I hesitated assigning him three reds over the first six weeks because he showed he is more-than-capable receiver last season, but if Green Bay features him in anything close to the same way it did Ryan Grant a few years ago, we could be talking about him as a top 20-25 player at this point next season with his talent and matchups following Week 6.

 Minnesota Vikings
Pos Player Age PPR Aver NPPR Aver PPR Non Totals 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
JAX IND SF DET TEN WAS ARI TB SEA DET bye CHI GB CHI STL HOU
QB Christian Ponder 24 19.1 19.1 229.1 229.1 3165 225 285 205 245 250 290 220 345 180 320 280 320 INJ INJ INJ
TD 18 2 1 0 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 3 INJ INJ INJ
INT 14 1 0 2 1 0 0 2 1 2 0 3 2 INJ INJ INJ
Ru Yards 165 10 25 15 10 5 15 25 10 5 20 10 15 INJ INJ INJ
Ru TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ INJ INJ
QB Joe Webb 25 12.5 12.5 37.6 37.6 640 215 225 200
TD 2 0 1 1
INT 3 0 1 2
Ru Yards 60 15 20 25
Ru TD 0 0 0 0
RB Adrian Peterson 27 11.3 9.9 158 139 880 30 60 30 50 35 65 INJ 70 55 105 45 100 70 90 75
Ru TD 6 0 1 0 0 0 1 INJ 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0
Re Yards 150 10 0 5 15 10 0 INJ 15 0 30 25 10 5 15 10
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 19 2 0 1 2 1 0 INJ 3 0 3 2 1 1 2 1
RB Toby Gerhart 25 9.1 7.1 136 106 615 55 75 55 50 80 25 75 35 20 20 35 15 20 35 20
Ru TD 4 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Re Yards 205 15 10 35 0 25 10 40 10 5 0 5 0 30 5 15
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 30 3 2 5 0 4 2 4 1 1 0 1 0 4 1 2
WR Percy Harvin 24 16.4 10.9 246 164 225 10 15 10 30 20 5 30 20 15 5 10 15 5 20 15
Ru TD 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Re Yards 935 50 75 30 55 90 55 40 85 50 65 100 40 75 65 60
Re TD 6 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Rec 82 5 6 3 6 6 4 4 7 5 6 8 4 6 6 6
WR Jerome Simpson 26 9.5 6.2 114 74 560 SUS SUS SUS 80 40 40 35 110 20 45 15 70 40 45 20
Re TD 3 SUS SUS SUS 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Rec 40 SUS SUS SUS 5 3 3 2 7 2 3 2 4 3 4 2
WR Michael Jenkins 30 4.6 2.7 50.5 29.5 235 40 25 15 15 10 45 30 INJ INJ INJ INJ 15 30 10 0
Re TD 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 INJ INJ INJ INJ 0 0 0 0
Rec 21 4 2 2 1 1 3 3 INJ INJ INJ INJ 2 2 1 0
WR Greg Childs 22 5.7 3.6 86 54 420 15 40 20 0 15 0 25 35 50 70 40 45 15 20 30
Re TD 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Rec 32 1 3 2 0 1 0 2 3 4 5 3 3 1 2 2
WR Devin Aromashodu 28 3.4 2 51 30 300 15 25 20 35 10 40 0 15 0 30 35 50 5 20 0
Re TD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rec 21 1 2 2 3 1 2 0 1 0 2 3 2 1 1 0
TE Kyle Rudolph 22 10.2 6.4 152.5 96.5 665 45 70 40 35 50 60 30 70 35 55 40 45 15 35 40
Re TD 5 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Rec 56 5 6 4 2 4 5 2 4 3 4 5 3 2 3 4
TE John Carlson 28 4.7 3 70 45 270 25 35 15 10 0 40 10 5 20 25 20 30 0 10 25
Re TD 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
Rec 25 2 3 2 1 0 3 1 1 2 2 2 3 0 1 2

General overview: Since joining the team in 2007, Adrian Peterson has been the one of the few unquestioned feature backs in the league and the centerpiece of this offense. For the first time since he was a rookie, however, Peterson is not only a risky early-round pick but a complete question mark for his own team. Make no mistake about it: if the team cares at all about getting vintage production out of Peterson in 2013 and beyond, they will force themselves to rely on Toby Gerhart this season. The injury to Peterson made addressing the offensive line even more of a priority – as he has been covering up that weakness for some time now – and the Vikings finally got the left tackle in Matt Kalil they have needed since Bryant McKinnie essentially force-fed his way out of Minnesota. Lost in the Vikings’ collapse last season was the relatively solid play of rookie QB Christian Ponder. Why “relatively”? Because despite OC Bill Musgrave’s attempts to keep this offense from maximizing its potential by handing a lot of playing time to veterans that may not be around this year (Michael Jenkins, Visanthe Shiancoe), Ponder was still able to post some fantasy-relevant games. The rookie signal-caller did this in spite of the fact his two most talented pass-catchers – Percy Harvin and rookie Kyle Rudolph – were relegated to part-time duty for at least half of the year. While Rudolph’s role is expected to increase, HC Leslie Frazier has stated that Harvin’s workload likely will not (even if he sees more playing time). As difficult as that may be for fantasy owners, it truly is the best of both worlds since it increases the likelihood that Harvin will come close to his 87-967-6 line (and 1,312 combined rushing and receiving yards) from a season ago while also making it easier for the team’s other receivers to benefit from the attention he will attract from defenses. The players most likely to benefit are deep threat Jerome Simpson (once he returns from his season-opening three-game suspension) and Rudolph, who can also stretch the field. However, the rich contract handed to TE John Carlson has me asking one question about Harvin, since he is most effective out of the slot. If the Vikings want to use a lot of two-TE personnel groupings like they say they do, can Harvin remain productive as a regular outside receiver?

Matchup analysis: As I detail above, Minnesota is going to be a bit short on healthy and eligible players to start the season, which is not good for Ponder’s early prospects. Already saddled with two red matchups over the first three weeks, he (and every player tied to him in the passing game) will have a hard time being productive against the Jags or Niners as Peterson continues to recover from his injury and Simpson serves his suspension. Simpson returns just in time to help Harvin and Ponder secure three winnable matchups from Weeks 4-6, but after that point, all Vikings’ players in the passing game besides Harvin and Rudolph should be hands-off in fantasy. The running game is a much bigger question mark simply because we almost need to see first just how much Peterson’s role will change this season. Does he start running strong in Week 4? Week 7? Week 13? For the purposes of this exercise, I have him taking back the reins around Week 6, but I’ll be the first to admit that is still pretty optimistic. Weeks 1 and 3 would be difficult for a healthy Peterson, so we shouldn’t expect Gerhart to fare very well either. Five of the next seven pre-bye games are winnable matchups, but each team could also force the Vikings to abandon the running game with their high-powered offensive attack. After the bye, a less-than-100% Peterson would be bad news against the likes of the Bears (twice), Packers and Texans, assuming each defense is relatively healthy at that point and the Green Bay run defense improves returns to its 2010 form.

Suggestions, comments, musings about the article or fantasy football in general? E-mail me or follow me on Twitter.


Doug Orth has written for FF Today since 2006, appeared in USA Today’s Fantasy Football Preview magazine in each of the last two seasons and served as a weekly fantasy football analyst for 106.7 The Fan (WJFK – Washington, D.C). He is also a member of the Fantasy Sports Writers Association.