|  
                Having discussed the benefits of breaking down each individual matchup 
              last week, I don’t feel inclined to rehash it for you this 
              week. (Please feel free to browse my 
              AFC-NFC East projections if you want to review some of the thinking 
              and methodology behind this system.)
  
 A d v e r t i s e m e n t Even though I have yet to finish all the projections or even 
                build my first “Big Board”, fantasy football is alive 
                and well. I am in the midst of an experts’ 
                dynasty league draft and am eagerly anticipating my second 
                year in the Pros 
                vs. Joes competition put on by the Fantasy Football Players 
                Championship (FFPC) this Friday. Last year’s entry crashed 
                and burned in this best-ball Draftmaster-style format as my team 
                suffered from an unexpected team change by a player (Zach Miller), 
                season-ending injuries to two of my top five picks (Jamaal Charles 
                and Peyton Manning) and three of my running backs (Charles, Ryan 
                Williams and Tim Hightower), which overshadowed incredible value 
                picks such as Wes Welker in the fourth, Steve Smith in the eighth 
                and Darren Sproles in the 13th. The injury picks that could have 
                been avoided – Manning and Williams – are the very 
                reason I don’t participate in early money-league drafts, 
                especially those that follow lockouts. However, I could have still 
                made a strong run for the title if Kyle Orton hadn’t been 
                my only other quarterback. Since the draft is the first and last 
                act an owner makes in Draftmaster format, I was helpless to address 
                the position and received zero points each week from my quarterback 
                for about half a season.
 But as a wise man once said, “You are the only person that 
                cares about your fantasy team.” So with that bit of wisdom 
                dispensed, let’s move on with the show…
  Here’s a quick review of what each color means in my color-coded 
                family:
 Red – A very difficult matchup. 
                For lower-level players, a red matchup means they should not be 
                used in fantasy that week. For a second- or third-tier player, 
                drop your expectations for them at least one grade that week (i.e. 
                from WR2 to WR3). For elite players, expect them to perform one 
                level lower than their usual status (i.e. RB1 performs like a 
                RB2).
 Yellow – Keep expectations 
                fairly low in this matchup. For lower-level players, a yellow 
                matchup is a borderline start at best. For a second- or third-tier 
                player, they can probably overcome the matchup if things fall 
                right. For the elite players, expect slightly better than average 
                production. Grey– Basically, this matchup 
                is one that could go either way. In some cases, I just don’t 
                feel like I have a good feel yet for this defense. Generally speaking, 
                these matchups are winnable matchups for all levels of players. Green – It doesn’t 
                get much better than this. For non-elite players, the stage is 
                basically set for said player to exploit the matchup. For the 
                elite player, this matchup should produce special numbers.  One notable change I made from last year regarding the labeling 
                of red, yellow or green matchups is acknowledging that while elite 
                players can sometimes have unfavorable matchups, their all-around 
                game simply makes them impossible to bench. (To take an obvious 
                example, sitting Michael Turner or Shonn Greene in a road matchup 
                vs. a fully healthy Seahawks defense is an understandable move 
                because Turner and Greene are highly dependent on the running 
                game in order to be viable in fantasy and Seattle’s run 
                defense is pretty solid when healthy, particularly at home. On 
                the other hand, LeSean McCoy cannot be benched against any defense 
                simply because he is so likely to get his 100 total yards almost 
                regardless of the competition since he is so versatile.) As a 
                result, the elite players will have mostly yellow boxes where 
                the non-elite players would typically have red. As far as the 
                passing game is concerned, more defenses are talking about using 
                “shadow” CBs than in recent years. (And just to be 
                clear, the term “shadow” doesn’t mean that he 
                is locked onto a team’s top option 100% of the time.) There 
                are the ”shadow” CBs most of us have become familiar 
                with – names such as Darrelle Revis, Johnathan Joseph and 
                Joe Haden – who will warrant a red box by many of the top 
                receivers they face. Many other cornerbacks – players like 
                Nnamdi Asomugha and Asante Samuel come immediately to mind – 
                typically remain on one side of the field, making it difficult 
                to give an opposing a true red since they may escape either player 
                by spending most of their time in the slot. In the case of Samuel, 
                however, he will have an equally effective corner opposite him 
                in Brent Grimes, making the slot (against the disappointing Dunta 
                Robinson) the only place of refuge for opposing receivers. I’ve updated the notes since last week, so please read 
                over them closely to better understand what you see below in the 
                tables:  Notes:
 
 
                The grey highlight in each team’s schedule reflects 
                  a road game.
 
These are my initial projections and therefore subject 
                  to change. In a few cases, the changes will be dramatic. Changes 
                  may come in the form of a different-colored matchup and/or a 
                  player’s “game log”. In some cases, a strong 
                  preseason may warrant the inclusion of one name in a team projection 
                  and the removal of another. I also feel obligated to mention 
                  that players with minimal projections (such as less than 100 
                  yards rushing or receiving) will be excluded from this four-week 
                  series but have been accounted for in my overall projections.
 
For all those readers whose eyes gravitate immediately 
                  to the player’s final numbers: they are 15-game totals 
                  because most fantasy seasons have a Week 16 title game.
 
The age you see by each player will be that player’s 
                  age as of September 1, 2012.
 
Since some players have such a unique role – Brad 
                  Smith last week and John Kuhn this week, for example – 
                  I have listed all their matchups as neutral. 
  Key to the table below: PPR Aver - Points 
                per game in full-point PPR leagues where all touchdowns are worth 
                six points.NPPR Aver - Points per game in non-PPR 
                leagues where all touchdowns are worth six points.
 PPR - Total points scored in PPR
 Non-PPR - Total points scored in 
                non-PPR.
 
 
 AFC NORTH 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Baltimore Ravens |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | CIN | PHI | NE | CLE | KC | DAL | HOU | bye | CLE | OAK | PIT | SD | PIT | WAS | DEN | NYG |   
                        | QB | Joe Flacco | 27 | 17.2 | 17.2 | 258.2 | 258.2 | 3605 |  | 230 | 210 | 320 | 175 | 230 | 285 | 215 |  | 185 | 265 | 245 | 290 | 185 | 230 | 210 | 330 |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 22 |  | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 |  | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 13 |  | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 80 |  | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 10 |  | 5 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 10 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Ray Rice | 25 | 22.2 | 17.8 | 333.5 | 267.5 | 1265 |  | 90 | 110 | 60 | 120 | 75 | 85 | 70 |  | 65 | 130 | 55 | 80 | 45 | 100 | 120 | 60 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 11 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 570 |  | 20 | 55 | 70 | 20 | 40 | 50 | 15 |  | 20 | 15 | 35 | 55 | 45 | 45 | 15 | 70 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 66 |  | 3 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 |  | 3 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 6 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Bernard Pierce | 22 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 45.5 | 40.5 | 260 |  | 15 | 20 | 10 | 30 | 10 | 20 | 15 |  | 20 | 25 | 15 | INJ | INJ | 30 | 15 | 35 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 25 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 |  | 0 | 10 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | 5 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 2 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Anquan Boldin | 31 | 12.4 | 7.6 | 173 | 107 | 770 |  | 45 | 60 | 60 | 70 | 65 | 35 | 65 |  | 55 | 35 | 80 | 40 | INJ | 55 | 45 | 60 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 66 |  | 3 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 5 |  | 4 | 3 | 7 | 4 | INJ | 5 | 4 | 5 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Torrey Smith | 23 | 12.4 | 8.5 | 186.5 | 127.5 | 915 |  | 85 | 35 | 75 | 30 | 50 | 85 | 15 |  | 45 | 100 | 70 | 80 | 25 | 85 | 30 | 105 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 59 |  | 6 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1 |  | 3 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 5 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Jacoby Jones | 28 | 3.6 | 2.2 | 54.5 | 33.5 | 275 |  | 20 | 0 | 15 | 10 | 35 | 15 | 40 |  | 10 | 15 | 0 | 25 | 30 | 10 | 40 | 10 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 21 |  | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Tandon Doss | 22 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 28 | 14 | 140 |  | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 |  | 20 | 10 | 15 | 15 | 30 | 0 | 10 | 5 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 14 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Ed Dickson | 25 | 8.2 | 5.2 | 115 | 73 | 490 |  | 20 | 45 | 50 | INJ | 10 | 70 | 30 |  | 25 | 15 | 35 | 55 | 30 | 25 | 35 | 45 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | INJ | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 42 |  | 2 | 4 | 3 | INJ | 1 | 6 | 3 |  | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Dennis Pitta | 27 | 5.3 | 3.3 | 79 | 49 | 310 |  | 25 | 15 | 35 | 30 | 30 | 25 | 10 |  | 10 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 0 | 35 | 25 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 30 |  | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 |  | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 |  |  General overview: Much to the chagrin 
              of Joe Flacco (and his agent, I’m sure), the fifth-year pro 
              isn’t the best quarterback in the league – or anywhere 
              close to it, for that matter. (Take a look at his QB 
              rating against some of the better defenses last season.) In 
              no way am I suggesting that he’ll never become a top quarterback, 
              but his assertion that he is there now is ridiculous. After their 
              Week 9 debacle against the Seahawks in which , the Ravens decided 
              less of Flacco and more of Ray Rice was a good thing and were rewarded 
              with a 7-2 finish to the season. One of the big factors in that 
              late-season success: Flacco did not attempt more than 36 passes 
              over his team’s final nine games after having done so five 
              times over the first nine weeks. While half a season is still a 
              relatively small sample size in the overall scheme of things, don’t 
              look for OC Cam Cameron to go away from Rice as the centerpiece 
              of the offense again anytime soon since it seems to upset his teammates 
              and fantasy owners alike every time he does – as it should. 
              The other major consideration is that with its loss of DE/LB Terrell 
              Suggs, Baltimore may want to try even harder to play ball-control. 
              Torrey Smith’s arrival on the scene last year was a pleasant 
              surprise and he has emerged as the best fantasy WR option this team 
              has, although the addition of another deep threat (Jacoby Jones) 
              should help Anquan Boldin squeeze out another quality year or two 
              as the main option in the slot. At TE, the Ravens own one of the 
              league’s better two-man tight end tandems in Ed Dickson and 
              Dennis Pitta.
 
 Matchup analysis: In a theme that 
              figures to be repeated several times throughout this piece, the 
              AFC North is a meat grinder of a division. While almost every other 
              division in the league seems to have an offensive juggernaut, this 
              one has a litany of teams that run the ball and play solid defense. 
              Throw in the first-place schedule the Ravens face along with four 
              games against the NFC East and perhaps no team has a more difficult 
              schedule as a whole than Baltimore. The passing-game matchups are 
              brutal as the case could be made that five of the seven pre-bye 
              contests feature teams with potentially elite defenses (Philadelphia 
              and Houston), lockdown cornerbacks attached to good schemes (Joe 
              Haden with Cleveland, Brandon Flowers with Kansas City) or a defense 
              that should finally be able to play up to its potential now with 
              a wealth of talent in the secondary (Dallas) to complement one of 
              the league’s best pass rushers in DeMarcus Ware. They face 
              the Browns coming out of the bye and it really doesn’t get 
              any easier, which is a big reason why Smith is a poor bet to experience 
              any kind of dramatic increase over last season. (In fact, I’m 
              pretty sure my projection for him is his absolute ceiling.) However, 
              just because I don’t see Smith posting huge numbers doesn’t 
              mean he doesn’t have to be accounted for, so look for just 
              about everyone else to post healthy reception totals as a result. 
              When compared to the passing game, Rice’s matchup line looks 
              relatively tame, but much of the credit for that goes to his all-around 
              game. (Take a look at Bernard Pierce’s matchup line in case 
              you want to know how difficult things could be for Rice if he was 
              just an average back.) While the fantasy playoff schedule isn’t 
              ideal for Rice, it is hardly insurmountable for a player of his 
              talents; with his contract situation resolved, he is still unquestionably 
              a top-three pick in fantasy.
 
 
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Cincinnati Bengals |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | BAL | CLE | WAS | JAX | MIA | CLE | PIT | bye | DEN | NYG | KC | OAK | SD | DAL | PHI | PIT |   
                        | QB | Andy Dalton | 24 | 17.3 | 17.3 | 259.6 | 259.6 | 3590 |  | 245 | 180 | 255 | 260 | 235 | 260 | 215 |  | 225 | 280 | 220 | 275 | 255 | 250 | 225 | 210 |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 21 |  | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 14 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |  | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 120 |  | 15 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 5 |  | 15 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 5 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | BenJarvus Green-Ellis | 27 | 9.9 | 8.9 | 148 | 134 | 830 |  | 45 | 70 | 50 | 65 | 70 | 55 | 30 |  | 65 | 35 | 65 | 75 | 60 | 50 | 60 | 35 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 90 |  | 5 | 0 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 14 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Bernard Scott | 29 | 7.5 | 6.2 | 104.5 | 86.5 | 555 |  | 35 | 40 | 20 | 15 | 55 | 50 | 30 |  | 40 | 75 | 45 | 35 | INJ | 45 | 50 | 20 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 130 |  | 15 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 15 | 0 |  | 15 | 0 | 20 | 10 | INJ | 15 | 10 | 10 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 18 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 |  | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | INJ | 2 | 2 | 1 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Brian Leonard | 28 | 3.8 | 2 | 57.5 | 30.5 | 125 |  | 10 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 15 |  | 5 | 0 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 0 | 5 | 10 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 180 |  | 15 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 20 | 10 | 15 |  | 20 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 15 | 20 | 10 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 27 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 |  | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | A.J. Green | 24 | 16.5 | 11.4 | 247 | 171 | 1110 |  | 50 | 75 | 105 | 85 | 65 | 45 | 70 |  | 45 | 120 | 75 | 115 | 75 | 50 | 55 | 80 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 10 |  | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 76 |  | 4 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 4 |  | 3 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 7 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Mohamed Sanu | 23 | 8.8 | 5.2 | 114 | 67 | 490 |  | 35 | 30 | 25 | 30 | 50 | 40 | 45 |  | 65 | 20 | 30 | 45 | INJ | INJ | 35 | 40 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 47 |  | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 4 |  | 5 | 2 | 3 | 5 | INJ | INJ | 4 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Jordan Shipley | 26 | 5.4 | 3.2 | 81.5 | 47.5 | 415 |  | 20 | 15 | 45 | 20 | 30 | 45 | 10 |  | 40 | 35 | 30 | 15 | 35 | 40 | 10 | 25 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 34 |  | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 |  | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Brandon Tate | 24 | 2 | 1.3 | 30 | 19 | 190 |  | 20 | 0 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 30 | 0 |  | 0 | 40 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 35 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 11 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Jermaine Gresham | 24 | 12.3 | 7.9 | 184 | 118 | 760 |  | 50 | 55 | 35 | 75 | 55 | 45 | 50 |  | 35 | 50 | 30 | 60 | 70 | 60 | 55 | 35 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 66 |  | 4 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 4 |  | 3 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 3 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Orson Charles | 21 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 32 | 16 | 160 |  | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 15 | 25 |  | 5 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 15 | 10 | 30 | 10 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 16 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |  |  General overview: Coming off a season in which the Bengals managed 
              to make the playoffs with a rookie quarterback, a rookie receiver 
              and first-year play-caller in an offensive attack led by Cedric 
              Benson, the arrow for this offense has to be pointing up, right? 
              There’s no question A.J. Green is the real deal, but Cincinnati 
              doesn’t appear ready yet to sacrifice its identity as a running 
              team anytime soon despite the fact that its two best playmakers 
              are in the passing game – Green and Jermaine Gresham. (And 
              let’s not even get into the complete misuse of Gresham to 
              this point in his career right now…) To their credit, the 
              Bengals attacked their receiver position in the offseason and should 
              have no shortage of young talent on the roster for years to come. 
              Rookie Mohamed Sanu looks to be the favorite to start opposite Green 
              for now, but the team has praised the work of Brandon Tate and Armon 
              Binns this spring and summer. Throughout the offseason, we have 
              consistently heard that Cincinnati intends on giving Bernard Scott 
              his fair share of playing time for the first time in his career, 
              which flies in the face of HC Marvin Lewis’ assertion that 
              new RB BenJarvus Green-Ellis is a “three-down back” 
              – something the coach said shortly after signing the former 
              Patriot. Not only has the “Law Firm” rarely ever shown 
              he should be on the field in passing situations, but both Scott 
              and Brian Leonard are bigger threats as receivers anyway. As a result, 
              this has the look of a 50-35-15 backfield split with Scott relieving 
              BJGE once about every three series and sharing some of the work 
              in the passing game with Leonard.
 Matchup analysis: In order for the “Law Firm” to 
                recoup some of the fantasy value he had during his final two years 
                with the Patriots, he needed to be featured in Cincy since he 
                won’t have the same kind of regular access to the end zone 
                that he did in New England. That doesn’t appear to be happening 
                here and, with his matchups, he looks to be a poor bet to reach 
                double-digit touchdowns for the third straight season. (If he 
                has one saving grace, however, it is that he is one of the best 
                goal-line backs in the league.) Each year, the 3-4 games during 
                the fantasy season against the Steelers and Ravens don’t 
                come as a surprise, but there just isn’t much reason for 
                optimism in this backfield this year with four more games against 
                the improved defenses of the NFC East and a few potentially good 
                offensive teams from the AFC West at the end of the schedule that 
                may force Cincinnati to abandon the run. Green-Ellis’ best 
                shot at fantasy value early are in Weeks 2, 5 and 6; after the 
                break, he’s going to need help. Scott offers big-play potential, 
                but he’s going to be hard-pressed to make a huge difference 
                in fantasy with a ceiling of roughly 150 touches, most of which 
                figure to be rushing attempts. In the passing game, Green also 
                has his work cut out for him against a number of the league’s 
                top corners and/or pass defenses, but proved last season that 
                he is already up to the challenge in that regard. I doubt the 
                same can be said about any of the other aforementioned receivers 
                (Sanu, Jordan Shipley, Tate or Binns) and their ability to produce 
                consistently against the highest level of competition, which should 
                lead to an increased reliance on Gresham. As a result of the challenging 
                defenses the Bengals should expect to see this year, don’t 
                be surprised to see a bit of a “sophomore slump” from 
                Andy Dalton. While his likely regression will probably be attributed 
                to defenses “figuring him out”, he will almost certainly 
                be able to place the bulk of the blame in a running game that 
                may not strike fear into many opponents and a group of secondary 
                receivers (of course, not including Green) too young to overcome 
                it.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Cleveland Browns |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | PHI | CIN | BUF | BAL | NYG | CIN | IND | SD | BAL | bye | DAL | PIT | OAK | KC | WAS | DEN |   
                        | QB | Brandon Weeden | 28 | 13.4 | 13.4 | 188.1 | 188.1 | 3190 |  | 200 | 215 | 240 | 210 | 255 | 285 | 230 | 285 | 190 |  | 90 | INJ | 275 | 215 | 270 | 230 |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 14 |  | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  | 0 | INJ | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 15 |  | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  | 0 | INJ | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 65 |  | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 0 |  | 0 | INJ | 5 | 10 | 5 | 10 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | QB | Seneca Wallace | 32 | 12.1 | 12.1 | 24.2 | 24.2 | 330 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 130 | 200 |  |  |  |  |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 | 0 |  |  |  |  |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 | 1 |  |  |  |  |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 30 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20 | 10 |  |  |  |  |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 | 0 |  |  |  |  |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Trent Richardson | 22 | 15.7 | 13.4 | 220 | 187 | 1165 |  | 85 | 100 | 90 | 35 | INJ | 75 | 150 | 80 | 60 |  | 80 | 45 | 120 | 75 | 80 | 90 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 8 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 225 |  | 25 | 10 | 20 | 20 | INJ | 10 | 0 | 10 | 15 |  | 30 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 10 | 25 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 33 |  | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | INJ | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |  | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Brandon Jackson | 26 | 5.4 | 3.3 | 65 | 40 | 170 |  | 15 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 25 | 10 | 10 | 15 | 10 |  | 20 | 15 | 15 | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 170 |  | 15 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 40 | 15 | 20 | 5 | 5 |  | 10 | 5 | 35 | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 25 |  | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 |  | 2 | 1 | 5 | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Montario Hardesty | 25 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 27.5 | 23.5 | 215 |  | 10 | 0 | 15 | 10 | 55 | 15 | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | INJ | 10 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 20 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | INJ | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | INJ | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Greg Little | 23 | 12.8 | 8 | 192 | 120 | 900 |  | 40 | 55 | 80 | 45 | 70 | 75 | 85 | 65 | 40 |  | 45 | 65 | 105 | 30 | 70 | 30 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 72 |  | 4 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 3 |  | 4 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Mohamed Massaquoi | 25 | 7.2 | 4.5 | 107.5 | 67.5 | 555 |  | 25 | 45 | 40 | 20 | 40 | 70 | 30 | 85 | 40 |  | 20 | 15 | 25 | 40 | 25 | 35 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 40 |  | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 4 |  | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Travis Benjamin | 22 | 3.5 | 2.1 | 49 | 29 | 290 |  | 0 | 20 | 0 | INJ | 15 | 30 | 30 | 25 | 35 |  | 10 | 30 | 0 | 15 | 35 | 45 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 20 |  | 0 | 2 | 0 | INJ | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 |  | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Josh Gordon | 21 | 5.4 | 3.5 | 81 | 53 | 410 |  | 0 | 0 | 10 | 25 | 15 | 25 | 15 | 0 | 30 |  | 65 | 20 | 50 | 60 | 50 | 45 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 28 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 |  | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Ben Watson | 31 | 8.8 | 5.2 | 114.5 | 67.5 | 495 |  | 30 | 40 | 55 | 35 | 40 | 60 | 25 | 65 | 15 |  | INJ | INJ | 35 | 25 | 50 | 20 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 47 |  | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 2 |  | INJ | INJ | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Evan Moore | 27 | 5.3 | 3.3 | 74 | 46 | 280 |  | 20 | 10 | 35 | 25 | 10 | INJ | 25 | 30 | 5 |  | 40 | 30 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 5 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 28 |  | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | INJ | 2 | 3 | 1 |  | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 |  |  General overview: If team president Mike Holmgren and everyone under 
              his direction are truly on the hot seat this year, they certainly 
              cannot be accused of playing things conservatively. This offense 
              has undergone a major facelift and has improved its talent base 
              dramatically. The main question is whether or not HC Pat Shurmur 
              be around to see it through. For the foreseeable future, the offense 
              will revolve around the talents of Trent Richardson, who is one 
              of the better running back prospects to come out in recent years. 
              In a league where 300-touch RBs are a dying breed, Richardson appears 
              to be a pretty good bet to hit that mark a few times over the next 
              4-5 years. With a legitimate big-play threat like Richardson behind 
              him, fellow rookie Brandon Weeden will have more of a shot at taking 
              quality shots down the field than Colt McCoy ever did. Certainly, 
              a big part of Cleveland’s small-ball approach with McCoy was 
              his limited arm strength, but another key reason was the lack of 
              receivers who could actually threaten a defense deep. Speaking of 
              such receivers, the Browns gave away their second-round pick in 
              2013 for Josh Gordon, the prize of the supplemental draft. Like 
              Greg Little (6-2, 220), Gordon (6-4, 220) gives the Browns another 
              big receiver that teams usually want in the West Coast offense. 
              And file TE Jordan Cameron’s name away as he may get a chance 
              to flash this season with some question marks ahead of him on the 
              depth chart. With improvements also made on the offensive line, 
              the future is brighter now (for fans and fantasy owners) than it 
              has been in some time for Cleveland. Whether or not the team makes 
              enough tangible progress this season is another question.
 Matchup analysis: With a fair amount of buzz coming out of Cleveland 
                that Brandon Jackson will take some or most of the passing-down 
                work, it would be a minor shock if Richardson hasn’t already 
                assumed that role early in the season. Like the back he has been 
                compared to repeatedly throughout the offseason – Adrian 
                Peterson – Richardson won’t be matchup-proof simply 
                because he won’t likely be given the opportunity to catch 
                40-50 balls right away like the Ray Rices, Arian Fosters and LeSean 
                McCoys of the world. But with a solid run-blocking line in front 
                of him and commitment to him as the centerpiece of this offense, 
                only a lackluster showing by the Browns’ defense (i.e. falling 
                behind by multiple scores early in games) or injury figure to 
                keep Richardson from producing like a low-end RB1 right away. 
                The first half of the schedule isn’t particularly easy, 
                but for someone with his combination of talent and expected workload, 
                it also isn’t overly daunting either. The hardest stretch 
                appears to be the five-week period in the two weeks before and 
                after the bye. The payoff for his owners should come after that 
                during the fantasy playoffs. I’m not nearly as optimistic 
                about the passing game, however, even though I do expect Little 
                to build on a 61-catch rookie season. Little has reportedly made 
                huge strides this offseason and will benefit from the talent upgrades 
                around him, including a more accurate and stronger-armed quarterback. 
                With so many first- and second-year players expected to be playing 
                key roles, it wouldn’t be fair to expect Weeden to pull 
                an Andy Dalton and push this team into the playoffs with a positive 
                TD-to-INT ratio. In three of his first five games, Weeden will 
                be asked to face some of the teams that should have the best pass 
                rushes in the game this year. In the other two games, he must 
                face Cincinnati and Baltimore on the road. Even though I did highlight 
                two green matchups for Weeden, I expect HC Chuck Pagano to have 
                his Colts’ defense overachieving by the middle part of the 
                season and HC Dennis Allen to have his Raiders’ secondary 
                playing well by the time the Browns visit.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Pittsburgh Steelers |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | DEN | NYJ | OAK | bye | PHI | TEN | CIN | WAS | NYG | KC | BAL | CLE | BAL | SD | DAL | CIN |   
                        | QB | Ben Roethlisberger | 30 | 17.8 | 17.8 | 266.9 | 266.9 | 3710 |  | 265 | 215 | 255 |  | 235 | 280 | 270 | 175 | 280 | 225 | 270 | 270 | 205 | 305 | 275 | 185 |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 22 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 |  | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 14 |  | 2 | 0 | 2 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 85 |  | 5 | 5 | 0 |  | 15 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 15 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | QB | Byron Leftwich | 32 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 80 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 80 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Rashard Mendenhall | 25 | 6.2 | 5.2 | 55.5 | 46.5 | 275 |  | PUP | PUP | PUP |  | PUP | PUP | PUP | 20 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50 | 35 | 55 | 25 | 50 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | PUP | PUP | PUP |  | PUP | PUP | PUP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 70 |  | PUP | PUP | PUP |  | PUP | PUP | PUP | 5 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 10 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | PUP | PUP | PUP |  | PUP | PUP | PUP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 9 |  | PUP | PUP | PUP |  | PUP | PUP | PUP | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Isaac Redman | 27 | 11.1 | 9.8 | 166 | 147 | 945 |  | 90 | 80 | 115 |  | 70 | 60 | 75 | 65 | 45 | 90 | 35 | 50 | 35 | 40 | 55 | 40 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 105 |  | 15 | 15 | 0 |  | 10 | 5 | 15 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 19 |  | 2 | 3 | 0 |  | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Jonathan Dwyer | 23 | 5.1 | 4.8 | 50.5 | 47.5 | 340 |  | 40 | 25 | 50 |  | 45 | 65 | 20 | 25 | 35 | 20 | 15 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 15 |  | 10 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Chris Rainey | 24 | 5.3 | 3.3 | 68.5 | 43.5 | 140 |  | 10 | 10 | 5 |  | 20 | 15 | INJ | INJ | 5 | 10 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 235 |  | 35 | 0 | 20 |  | 25 | 20 | INJ | INJ | 15 | 25 | 15 | 20 | 0 | 35 | 10 | 15 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 25 |  | 3 | 0 | 2 |  | 2 | 2 | INJ | INJ | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Mike Wallace | 26 | 14.2 | 10 | 213 | 150 | 1080 |  | 35 | 40 | 105 |  | 60 | 135 | 90 | 75 | 80 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 70 | 115 | 80 | 55 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 63 |  | 2 | 3 | 5 |  | 4 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Antonio Brown | 24 | 13.4 | 8.6 | 200.5 | 128.5 | 985 |  | 60 | 50 | 70 |  | 40 | 75 | 80 | 80 | 45 | 100 | 65 | 90 | 45 | 85 | 60 | 40 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 72 |  | 5 | 4 | 5 |  | 3 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Emmanuel Sanders | 25 | 6.5 | 4 | 78.5 | 48.5 | 365 |  | 50 | 40 | 20 |  | 25 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 50 | 5 | 30 | 25 | 40 | 10 | 40 | 30 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 30 |  | 4 | 3 | 2 |  | 2 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Jerricho Cotchery | 30 | 4.5 | 2.9 | 68 | 43 | 310 |  | 25 | 35 | 0 |  | 25 | 15 | 35 | 30 | 10 | 25 | 40 | 0 | 15 | 15 | 25 | 15 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 25 |  | 2 | 2 | 0 |  | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Heath Miller | 29 | 9.4 | 5.8 | 141 | 87 | 570 |  | 25 | 35 | 40 |  | 45 | 30 | 45 | 35 | 55 | 15 | 65 | 55 | 25 | 30 | 50 | 20 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 54 |  | 2 | 5 | 4 |  | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 |  |  General overview: Where to begin…ex-OC Bruce Arians was essentially 
              shown the door, opening the door for new OC Todd Haley to take over. 
              Haley has promised a stronger commitment to the running game with 
              more high-percentage passing, but the talent on the roster (at least 
              when it is healthy or not taking part in offseason workouts) suggests 
              this is still a big-play offense that needs to ride Ben Roethlisberger’s 
              arm. It is anyone’s guess when WR Mike Wallace will report 
              to the team, but as of now, he doesn’t appear to be a threat 
              to miss much – if any – training camp. The circumstances 
              are much different for Rashard Mendenhall, who has either “healed 
              wonderfully” (if you believe him) or a candidate for the PUP 
              list (if you believe modern medicine) following his ACL tear on 
              New Year’s Day last season. The commitment to the running 
              game would have made more sense with a healthy Mendenhall, so there 
              is reason to be skeptical about how much this offense is really 
              changing. For what it is worth, Haley has directed a successful 
              running attack as a head coach in Kansas City and a prolific passing 
              attack as a play-caller in Arizona. One player that has caught Haley’s 
              eye is TE Heath Miller, who is the most complete TE he has worked 
              with since Jason Witten more than five years ago. It is also worth 
              noting that Haley found another gadget player to give defenses fits 
              in rookie Chris Rainey. While he cannot serve as a change-of-pace 
              or emergency running back like former Haley protégé 
              Dexter McCluster nor is he another hybrid player like Percy Harvin, 
              Rainey is every bit as explosive – if not more so – 
              than either player. Like McCluster, he’ll probably be just 
              on the cusp of fantasy relevancy but his inconsistent touches will 
              probably keep him from being a bench-worthy fantasy property.
 Matchup analysis: Wallace had better be ready to hit the ground 
                running when he reports because he could get off to a rather poor 
                start against the likes of Champ Bailey and Darrelle Revis in 
                Weeks 1-2. He may find refuge against the Raiders in Week 3, but 
                the Steelers have an early bye in Week 4 and face the venerable 
                Eagles’ secondary the following week. It may be at that 
                point fantasy owners want to trade for him since he has “winnable” 
                fantasy matchups in eight of the final 12 games of the fantasy 
                season. The argument could be made that a safer receiver might 
                be teammate Antonio Brown since he obviously benefits from all 
                the attention Wallace commands. After all, Brown will face lesser 
                coverage more regularly and has already earned the respect of 
                Roethlisberger. Whereas Wallace could see shadow coverage at various 
                points in nearly half of his games in 2012, Brown should have 
                it relatively easy by comparison. Assuming Mendenhall begins the 
                season on the PUP list, this is where the running game gets interesting. 
                While the quarterbacks and receivers could struggle to get going 
                early with some difficult matchups, the same is unlikely to be 
                said about the ground game led by Isaac Redman. Only the Jets 
                strike me as a possible tough matchup out of the first six opponents 
                and even they need to make a great deal of improvement on their 
                lackluster showing in 2011. With Mendenhall likely to return about 
                the time that “easy” stretch comes to an end and the 
                strong possibility that a run of tougher defenses is about to 
                begin, it may not be a bad idea to shop Redman at that time. It’s 
                also entirely possible that we know as much now as we will in 
                Week 7 or 8 about whether Redman will have grabbed ahold of the 
                feature-back role or if Pittsburgh will force the two to work 
                in tandem. Worse yet, there is always the possibility that a motivated 
                Jonathan Dwyer will force his way into the conversation. And if 
                any or all of that comes to fruition, it is too bad since Pittsburgh 
                addressed its offensive line this offseason and has provided fantasy 
                owners with a consistent RB2 option for several years now.
 NFC NORTH 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Chicago Bears |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | IND | GB | STL | DAL | JAX | bye | DET | CAR | TEN | HOU | SF | MIN | SEA | MIN | GB | ARI |   
                        | QB | Jay Cutler | 29 | 19.6 | 19.6 | 293.8 | 293.8 | 3770 |  | 270 | 365 | 210 | 270 | 260 |  | 340 | 225 | 275 | 145 | 210 | 310 | 175 | 215 | 260 | 240 |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 24 |  | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 |  | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 15 |  | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 170 |  | 5 | 25 | 10 | 15 | 10 |  | 15 | 0 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 20 | 20 | 10 | 0 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Matt Forte | 26 | 16 | 12.5 | 240 | 187 | 1065 |  | 80 | 70 | 110 | 65 | 70 |  | 110 | 125 | 50 | 65 | 45 | 40 | 55 | 85 | 30 | 65 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 445 |  | 35 | 50 | 15 | 25 | 10 |  | 30 | 55 | 20 | 15 | 20 | 55 | 15 | 40 | 45 | 15 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 53 |  | 4 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 2 |  | 4 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Michael Bush | 28 | 9.2 | 7.7 | 137.5 | 115.5 | 570 |  | 40 | 35 | 55 | 40 | 25 |  | 15 | 50 | 35 | 25 | 35 | 60 | 35 | 35 | 50 | 35 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 165 |  | 10 | 25 | 10 | 5 | 25 |  | 0 | 10 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 10 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 22 |  | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 |  | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Brandon Marshall | 28 | 16.6 | 10.8 | 248.5 | 162.5 | 1145 |  | 80 | 120 | 45 | 85 | 65 |  | 150 | 55 | 85 | 35 | 55 | 80 | 70 | 50 | 100 | 70 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 8 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 86 |  | 7 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 5 |  | 11 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 5 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Alshon Jeffery | 22 | 7.5 | 4.9 | 112.5 | 73.5 | 555 |  | 35 | 40 | 20 | 10 | 40 |  | 55 | 40 | 45 | 20 | 50 | 80 | 15 | 45 | 25 | 35 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 39 |  | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 |  | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Earl Bennett | 25 | 8 | 4.5 | 103.5 | 58.5 | 465 |  | 40 | 55 | 30 | 50 | 45 |  | 30 | 0 | 50 | 40 | INJ | INJ | 35 | 25 | 25 | 40 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 45 |  | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 |  | 3 | 0 | 4 | 5 | INJ | INJ | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Devin Hester | 29 | 4.7 | 3 | 70 | 45 | 390 |  | 25 | 30 | 40 | 70 | 20 |  | 55 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 25 |  | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 |  | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Kellen Davis | 26 | 9.6 | 6.1 | 144 | 92 | 560 |  | 45 | 40 | 50 | 25 | 40 |  | 15 | 35 | 60 | 30 | 40 | 40 | 20 | 45 | 45 | 30 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 52 |  | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 |  | 2 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 3 |  |  General overview: It took new GM Phil Emery one offseason to do 
              what his predecessor had trouble doing in 11 years: find a competent 
              receiver to give his quarterback a chance at fielding a respectable 
              passing attack that forces defenses to think about someone else 
              besides Matt Forte. It’s not like Brandon Marshall comes without 
              risk – there’s a reason Chicago only had to surrender 
              two third-rounders to get a Pro Bowl talent like him – but 
              to secure a receiver who commands as much attention as he does is 
              a coup at that price. The fact that he also has a history with QB 
              Jay Cutler is just an incredible bonus. As such, the term “dynamic 
              offense” has a chance to be associated with this offense for 
              the first time in years. Chicago also took another chance on a second-round 
              receiver in Alshon Jeffery, who could quickly become one of the 
              better deep threats in the league if he decides another 25-pound 
              weight gain is not in his best professional interest. And the improvements 
              didn’t just at receiver; Emery signed Michael Bush to resume 
              the same kind of goal-line/change-of-pace role he had in Oakland, 
              replacing the mostly ineffective Marion Barber. Last but not least, 
              let’s not forget my obligatory mention of Mike Martz, who 
              was “allowed” to retire so the Bears could turn the 
              offense over to new OC Mike Tice and QB coach/passing-game coordinator 
              Jeremy Bates, who knows the Cutler-Marshall duo from his time in 
              Denver under then-HC Mike Shanahan. The departure of Martz and promotion 
              of Tice means that the tight end is now an option in the passing 
              game. While Martz wasn’t hiding a Vernon Davis-like talent 
              in Chicago, Kellen Davis was an incredibly underused option in the 
              passing game. I am very confident his will be one name owners will 
              want to get to know early in the season.
 Matchup analysis: With the aforementioned personnel upgrades 
                and perhaps the softest slate of matchups I have seen to this 
                point (relative to the talent on the offense), Cutler is going 
                to have his best shot at 4,000+ yards and 25+ TDs since posting 
                the best fantasy season of his career in 2008 – his final 
                season as a Bronco when Bates was his position coach. Of the Bears’ 
                first eight games, only the Rams’ Cortland Finnegan, the 
                Cowboys’ Morris Claiborne and the Jaguars’ Derek Cox 
                have the size and/or feistiness to challenge Marshall. Of those 
                three, only Finnegan (the smallest but feistiest of the bunch) 
                is likely to shadow him. Marshall – and by extension, Cutler 
                – could have a rough second half if Jeffery doesn’t 
                develop at the rate the Bears want him to since the elite defenses 
                of the Niners and Texans are followed by three games against the 
                Vikings (who have a very capable CB with size to frustrate Marshall 
                in Chris Cook) and Seahawks, who start a pair of cornerbacks in 
                6-3 Richard Sherman and 6-4 Brandon Browner that proved their 
                worth in 2011. In Weeks 15-16, Chicago must face what should be 
                an improved Packers secondary and Marshall will likely have a 
                “shadow date” the next week with Arizona’s Patrick 
                Peterson, who we should expect to be dramatically better as a 
                cover CB at the end of his second season than he was as a rookie. 
                Shifting to the running game, a fast start can be expected with 
                the likes of the Colts and Rams in September and the Lions, Panthers 
                and Titans in the three weeks following the bye. While the all-around 
                game of Forte and goal-line opportunities Bush will have in this 
                offense should keep them both relevant in fantasy, Week 9 may 
                be a good time to sell both players as Houston, San Francisco, 
                Seattle, Green Bay and Arizona all have the personnel necessary 
                to wreak havoc on the Bears’ rushing attack.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Detroit Lions |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | STL | SF | TEN | MIN | bye | PHI | CHI | SEA | JAX | MIN | GB | HOU | IND | GB | ARI | ATL |   
                        | QB | Matthew Stafford | 24 | 25.7 | 25.7 | 385.8 | 385.8 | 4770 |  | 350 | 315 | 435 | 335 |  | 315 | 295 | 310 | 250 | 270 | 380 | 270 | 390 | 275 | 350 | 230 |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 36 |  | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 |  | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 14 |  | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |  | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 70 |  | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |  | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 20 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Jahvid Best | 23 | 15.2 | 11.1 | 182 | 133 | 595 |  | 70 | 25 | 45 | 35 |  | 55 | 65 | 20 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 30 | 125 | 45 | 45 | 35 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 435 |  | 40 | 55 | 35 | 60 |  | 20 | 40 | 15 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 40 | 15 | 50 | 40 | 25 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 49 |  | 4 | 6 | 3 | 6 |  | 4 | 5 | 1 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 5 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 3 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Mikel Leshoure | 22 | 8.1 | 7.1 | 80.5 | 70.5 | 410 |  | SUS | SUS | 25 | 40 |  | 50 | 30 | 25 | 35 | 60 | 70 | 45 | 30 | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | SUS | SUS | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 55 |  | SUS | SUS | 0 | 5 |  | 10 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 5 | 15 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | SUS | SUS | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 10 |  | SUS | SUS | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Kevin Smith | 25 | 6.1 | 4.7 | 79.5 | 60.5 | 290 |  | 35 | 30 | 15 | 10 |  | 0 | 15 | 35 | 55 | 20 | INJ | INJ | 10 | 30 | 15 | 20 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 135 |  | 15 | 5 | 5 | 10 |  | 0 | 0 | 20 | 25 | 15 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 15 | 10 | 15 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 19 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Calvin Johnson | 26 | 21.4 | 15.1 | 321.5 | 226.5 | 1485 |  | 80 | 115 | 165 | 120 |  | 80 | 115 | 90 | 55 | 70 | 130 | 65 | 180 | 65 | 110 | 45 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 13 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 95 |  | 5 | 8 | 11 | 7 |  | 7 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Nate Burleson | 31 | 8.4 | 5 | 125.5 | 74.5 | 565 |  | 35 | 25 | 50 | 30 |  | 40 | 40 | 50 | 65 | 30 | 50 | 30 | 40 | 20 | 25 | 35 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 51 |  | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 |  | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Titus Young | 23 | 12.4 | 8.3 | 185.5 | 124.5 | 825 |  | 110 | 30 | 80 | 40 |  | 60 | 35 | 70 | 40 | 75 | 55 | 20 | 80 | 45 | 70 | 15 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 61 |  | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 |  | 6 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 1 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Ryan Broyles | 24 | 5.5 | 3.4 | 66.5 | 40.5 | 285 |  | 10 | 20 | 25 | 15 |  | 30 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 10 | 30 | 35 | 15 | 30 | 40 | 25 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 26 |  | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 |  | 2 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Brandon Pettigrew | 27 | 11.9 | 7.2 | 179 | 108 | 720 |  | 50 | 50 | 35 | 55 |  | 65 | 35 | 60 | 35 | 20 | 80 | 45 | 60 | 35 | 45 | 50 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 71 |  | 5 | 7 | 4 | 5 |  | 7 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Tony Scheffler | 29 | 4.5 | 3 | 67.5 | 44.5 | 265 |  | 10 | 15 | 40 | 0 |  | 10 | 30 | 0 | 15 | 45 | 20 | 35 | 0 | 15 | 10 | 20 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 23 |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 |  | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |  |  General overview: No team carried the flag for the passing game 
              last year quite like the Lions, attempting a league-high 666 passes. 
              Naturally, Detroit poured even more resources into its passing game 
              through the draft by adding a prolific slot receiver (Ryan Broyles) 
              to what is already an incredible offensive machine. While it could 
              be argued that the selection of OT Riley Reiff was made to address 
              the running game, the Lions have given no indication – and 
              for good reason – they want to move to a more balanced offense. 
              And it is hard to argue the point since the combination of Matthew 
              Stafford and Calvin Johnson is as good as there is in the game right 
              now. Even though Titus Young is just entering his second season, 
              he appears to be primed to overtake Nate Burleson as a starter at 
              some point this season and enjoy his breakout season. There is also 
              Brandon Pettigrew, who offers virtually no playmaking ability but 
              is clearly a safety option for Stafford that benefits greatly from 
              the fact that no defense can afford to commit resources to him when 
              Johnson and Young are stretching defenses outside the numbers. At 
              this point, the running game would be happy if it could simply keep 
              one quality running back healthy (or out of trouble) at all times. 
              The hope is someday that Jahvid Best can stay healthy long enough 
              to be this offense’s Reggie Bush while Mikel LeShoure attempts 
              to pound away with 12-15 “power runs” each game, similar 
              to what the Saints hope to do with Mark Ingram.
 Matchup analysis: For most of the NFL, the Lions’ schedule 
                would pose a difficult challenge. Yes, Stafford and Johnson will 
                have their down weeks from time to time, but there are only a 
                few matchups that should truly give owners pause this season despite 
                the plethora of yellow above. For Johnson, it may be difficult 
                for him to find the end zone against the Niners (Week 2) and Falcons 
                (Week 16). But outside of that, his size, speed and leaping ability 
                make it next to impossible for even the best cover corners on 
                the schedule to match up with him. Because of the sheer number 
                of other weapons he has – along with Johnson – Stafford 
                is in a similar spot as Johnson with no opponent possessing enough 
                Pro Bowl-caliber defenders to cover every single threat the Lions 
                have. Because it is quite likely the Lions pass the ball twice 
                as much as they run it again this season, the combination of Best, 
                LeShoure and Kevin Smith are a bit harder to plan for in 2012. 
                I expect LeShoure to stick to the ground game with Best taking 
                fewer carries and the majority of the work in the passing game, 
                meaning his slate starts off nicely against three beatable defenses 
                after his suspension ends but it quickly turns difficult with 
                just 1-2 “easy” matchups the rest of the way. With 
                Detroit so committed to the pass, it may be advantageous for LeShoure’s 
                owners to trade him right after the bye (unless, of course, those 
                same owners think LeShoure will be the last man standing in this 
                backfield). The only really tough fantasy calls I see for Best 
                (and Smith if/when Best is out) are against the Niners and Falcons 
                – two teams with enough talent across the board on defense 
                and enough of a ball-control mentality on offense to stymie the 
                Lions’ potent attack to some degree.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Green Bay Packers |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | SF | CHI | SEA | NO | IND | HOU | STL | JAX | ARI | bye | DET | NYG | MIN | DET | CHI | TEN |   
                        | QB | Aaron Rodgers | 28 | 31.6 | 31.6 | 474.6 | 474.6 | 4715 |  | 285 | 330 | 285 | 405 | 365 | 260 | 255 | 290 | 340 |  | 360 | 300 | 305 | 385 | 280 | 270 |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 43 |  | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 |  | 4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 240 |  | 20 | 15 | 25 | 0 | 10 | 35 | 15 | 5 | 20 |  | 10 | 35 | 5 | 15 | 10 | 20 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | QB | Graham Harrell |  | 2 | 2 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 140 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 20 |  |  |  |  |  | 35 |  |  | 85 |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  | 0 |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  | 0 |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  | 5 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | James Starks | 26 | 13.8 | 11.7 | 179.5 | 152.5 | 915 |  | 50 | 70 | 65 | 75 | 90 | 55 | 80 | 55 | 65 |  | 110 | 50 | INJ | INJ | 65 | 85 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 1 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 190 |  | 20 | 10 | 15 | 30 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 5 | 15 |  | 10 | 15 | INJ | INJ | 10 | 15 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 27 |  | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 |  | 1 | 2 | INJ | INJ | 2 | 3 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Alex Green | 24 | 6.4 | 4.8 | 96.5 | 71.5 | 490 |  | 25 | 20 | 20 | 15 | 30 | 15 | 45 | 30 | 20 |  | 15 | 30 | 60 | 70 | 50 | 45 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 165 |  | 10 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 15 | 5 | 15 | 10 |  | 20 | 10 | 20 | 15 | 5 | 5 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 25 |  | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 |  | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Brandon Saine | 23 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 34 | 16 | 60 |  | 5 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 10 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 100 |  | 0 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 10 | 10 |  | 0 | 5 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 10 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 18 |  | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 |  | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | John Kuhn | 29 | 3.3 | 2.5 | 50 | 38 | 70 |  | 10 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |  | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 10 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 70 |  | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 5 |  | 10 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 5 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 12 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Greg Jennings | 28 | 16.3 | 11.3 | 244 | 169 | 1090 |  | 65 | 90 | 60 | 85 | 75 | 25 | 50 | 55 | 80 |  | 115 | 70 | 45 | 90 | 80 | 105 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 10 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 75 |  | 5 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 |  | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 7 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Jordy Nelson | 27 | 14.7 | 10.3 | 220 | 154 | 1060 |  | 40 | 55 | 45 | 70 | 135 | 60 | 85 | 30 | 100 |  | 35 | 45 | 115 | 110 | 80 | 55 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 8 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 66 |  | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 4 |  | 4 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Donald Driver | 37 | 5.4 | 3.6 | 81 | 54 | 300 |  | 25 | 0 | 35 | 20 | 10 | 30 | 0 | 65 | 15 |  | 20 | 0 | 10 | 35 | 10 | 25 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 27 |  | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 2 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Randall Cobb | 22 | 8.2 | 5.6 | 123.5 | 84.5 | 605 |  | 25 | 50 | 70 | 45 | 20 | 45 | 25 | 10 | 40 |  | 30 | 30 | 75 | 50 | 40 | 50 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 39 |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 |  | 4 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | James Jones | 27 | 5.4 | 3.9 | 81 | 59 | 350 |  | 30 | 25 | 0 | 65 | 20 | 0 | 35 | 15 | 15 |  | 70 | 35 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 22 |  | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 |  | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Jermichael Finley | 25 | 13.5 | 9 | 202.5 | 134.5 | 865 |  | 65 | 75 | 45 | 60 | 70 | 40 | 45 | 80 | 50 |  | 50 | 75 | 60 | 45 | 40 | 65 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 8 |  | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 68 |  | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 3 |  | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 |  |  General overview: It goes without saying that Aaron Rodgers’ 
              unmatched combination of agility and accuracy is the straw that 
              stirs the Packers’ drink, although it certainly helps the 
              cause to have such a deep and talented receiving corps. After a 
              forgettable 2011, don’t be a bit surprised if Jermichael Finley 
              finally takes the leap many expected him to make last year into 
              the elite group of tight ends. With a quarterback like Rodgers who 
              will sometimes find 10-11 different receivers during the course 
              of a game, Finley isn’t likely to challenge the Grahams and 
              Gronkowskis of the world, but he sure could make a run at them if 
              he simply returns to form and stays healthy. Greg Jennings is the 
              one constant in the passing attack, yet always seems a bit undervalued 
              on draft day – he’s a solid bet for 70-75 catches, 1,000 
              yards and 8-10 scores for the next 2-3 years at least. As memorable 
              as Jordy Nelson’s season was last year, it wouldn’t 
              be surprising to see Randall Cobb start eating into Nelson’s 
              production when the fantasy playoffs roll around if/once he overtakes 
              Donald Driver. With the way Rodgers carries the offense on his shoulders, 
              it is easy to forget the Packers also have a bit of a ground game, 
              that is, outside of his scrambles. And with any luck, owners may 
              get their wish for another feature back if James Starks can stay 
              healthy. With Alex Green returning from an ACL injury suffered during 
              the middle of his rookie season last year and Brandon Saine – 
              who will likely be limited mostly to third-down duty – the 
              coast is clear for Starks to give the Packers their first reliable 
              fantasy starter at RB since 2009.
 Matchup analysis: A quarterback of Rodgers’ incredible 
                all-around talent does not need any help from the people who put 
                together the schedule, but it sure looks like he got it here. 
                While the schedule makers are not responsible for what divisions 
                Green Bay must play each year, they can control the fact that 
                three of the final four games the Packers play during the fantasy 
                season will be at home against teams that figure to field some 
                of the poorer pass defenses in the league. He could easily live 
                up to my six-game post-bye projection of 1,890 yards and 19 touchdowns. 
                Much like Rodgers, Jennings’ difficult matchups are front-loaded, 
                but the combination of Rodgers’ accuracy and the trust he 
                has in Jennings overcomes all but the most elite cornerbacks in 
                the league. Nelson’s chances to repeat his monster 2011 
                appear strong with the lack of red and yellow on his schedule, 
                but his unsustainable peripherals (such as his 22.06% touchdown 
                rate and his 71.4% catch rate on balls thrown more than 20 yards 
                down the field) suggest a regression to the mean is likely in 
                store. He benefited greatly from a number of weak pass defenses 
                last season, especially over the final two weeks of the regular 
                season when he accumulated over 21% of his yards and 33% of his 
                touchdowns once Jennings was lost for the remainder of the regular 
                season. Some of the Nelson’s lost production should fall 
                into Finley’s lap. In some of the games I re-watched during 
                the offseason, Finley was targeted relentlessly when defenses 
                played zone – a trend I expect opponents to use a lot this 
                season against the Packers. I think it is a stretch to say Finley 
                even has four yellow matchups this season – his immediate 
                fantasy future looks bright. The same thing can be said about 
                Starks if he can stay healthy. I hesitated assigning him three 
                reds over the first six weeks because he showed he is more-than-capable 
                receiver last season, but if Green Bay features him in anything 
                close to the same way it did Ryan Grant a few years ago, we could 
                be talking about him as a top 20-25 player at this point next 
                season with his talent and matchups following Week 6. 
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Minnesota Vikings |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | JAX | IND | SF | DET | TEN | WAS | ARI | TB | SEA | DET | bye | CHI | GB | CHI | STL | HOU |   
                        | QB | Christian Ponder | 24 | 19.1 | 19.1 | 229.1 | 229.1 | 3165 |  | 225 | 285 | 205 | 245 | 250 | 290 | 220 | 345 | 180 | 320 |  | 280 | 320 | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 18 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |  | 1 | 3 | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 14 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 |  | 3 | 2 | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 165 |  | 10 | 25 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 15 | 25 | 10 | 5 | 20 |  | 10 | 15 | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | QB | Joe Webb | 25 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 37.6 | 37.6 | 640 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 215 | 225 | 200 |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 | 1 | 1 |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 | 1 | 2 |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 60 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 15 | 20 | 25 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Adrian Peterson | 27 | 11.3 | 9.9 | 158 | 139 | 880 |  | 30 | 60 | 30 | 50 | 35 | 65 | INJ | 70 | 55 | 105 |  | 45 | 100 | 70 | 90 | 75 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | INJ | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 150 |  | 10 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 10 | 0 | INJ | 15 | 0 | 30 |  | 25 | 10 | 5 | 15 | 10 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 19 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | INJ | 3 | 0 | 3 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Toby Gerhart | 25 | 9.1 | 7.1 | 136 | 106 | 615 |  | 55 | 75 | 55 | 50 | 80 | 25 | 75 | 35 | 20 | 20 |  | 35 | 15 | 20 | 35 | 20 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 205 |  | 15 | 10 | 35 | 0 | 25 | 10 | 40 | 10 | 5 | 0 |  | 5 | 0 | 30 | 5 | 15 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 30 |  | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Percy Harvin | 24 | 16.4 | 10.9 | 246 | 164 | 225 |  | 10 | 15 | 10 | 30 | 20 | 5 | 30 | 20 | 15 | 5 |  | 10 | 15 | 5 | 20 | 15 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 935 |  | 50 | 75 | 30 | 55 | 90 | 55 | 40 | 85 | 50 | 65 |  | 100 | 40 | 75 | 65 | 60 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 82 |  | 5 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 6 |  | 8 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Jerome Simpson | 26 | 9.5 | 6.2 | 114 | 74 | 560 |  | SUS | SUS | SUS | 80 | 40 | 40 | 35 | 110 | 20 | 45 |  | 15 | 70 | 40 | 45 | 20 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | SUS | SUS | SUS | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 40 |  | SUS | SUS | SUS | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 3 |  | 2 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Michael Jenkins | 30 | 4.6 | 2.7 | 50.5 | 29.5 | 235 |  | 40 | 25 | 15 | 15 | 10 | 45 | 30 | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | INJ | 15 | 30 | 10 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 21 |  | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | INJ | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Greg Childs | 22 | 5.7 | 3.6 | 86 | 54 | 420 |  | 15 | 40 | 20 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 25 | 35 | 50 | 70 |  | 40 | 45 | 15 | 20 | 30 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 32 |  | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |  | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Devin Aromashodu | 28 | 3.4 | 2 | 51 | 30 | 300 |  | 15 | 25 | 20 | 35 | 10 | 40 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 30 |  | 35 | 50 | 5 | 20 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 21 |  | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |  | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Kyle Rudolph | 22 | 10.2 | 6.4 | 152.5 | 96.5 | 665 |  | 45 | 70 | 40 | 35 | 50 | 60 | 30 | 70 | 35 | 55 |  | 40 | 45 | 15 | 35 | 40 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 56 |  | 5 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 4 |  | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | John Carlson | 28 | 4.7 | 3 | 70 | 45 | 270 |  | 25 | 35 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 40 | 10 | 5 | 20 | 25 |  | 20 | 30 | 0 | 10 | 25 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 25 |  | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |  | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 |  |  General overview: Since joining the team in 2007, Adrian Peterson 
                has been the one of the few unquestioned feature backs in the 
                league and the centerpiece of this offense. For the first time 
                since he was a rookie, however, Peterson is not only a risky early-round 
                pick but a complete question mark for his own team. Make no mistake 
                about it: if the team cares at all about getting vintage production 
                out of Peterson in 2013 and beyond, they will force themselves 
                to rely on Toby Gerhart this season. The injury to Peterson made 
                addressing the offensive line even more of a priority – 
                as he has been covering up that weakness for some time now – 
                and the Vikings finally got the left tackle in Matt Kalil they 
                have needed since Bryant McKinnie essentially force-fed his way 
                out of Minnesota. Lost in the Vikings’ collapse last season 
                was the relatively solid play of rookie QB Christian Ponder. Why 
                “relatively”? Because despite OC Bill Musgrave’s 
                attempts to keep this offense from maximizing its potential by 
                handing a lot of playing time to veterans that may not be around 
                this year (Michael Jenkins, Visanthe Shiancoe), Ponder was still 
                able to post some fantasy-relevant games. The rookie signal-caller 
                did this in spite of the fact his two most talented pass-catchers 
                – Percy Harvin and rookie Kyle Rudolph – were relegated 
                to part-time duty for at least half of the year. While Rudolph’s 
                role is expected to increase, HC Leslie Frazier has stated that 
                Harvin’s workload likely will not (even if he sees more 
                playing time). As difficult as that may be for fantasy owners, 
                it truly is the best of both worlds since it increases the likelihood 
                that Harvin will come close to his 87-967-6 line (and 1,312 combined 
                rushing and receiving yards) from a season ago while also making 
                it easier for the team’s other receivers to benefit from 
                the attention he will attract from defenses. The players most 
                likely to benefit are deep threat Jerome Simpson (once he returns 
                from his season-opening three-game suspension) and Rudolph, who 
                can also stretch the field. However, the rich contract handed 
                to TE John Carlson has me asking one question about Harvin, since 
                he is most effective out of the slot. If the Vikings want to use 
                a lot of two-TE personnel groupings like they say they do, can 
                Harvin remain productive as a regular outside receiver? Matchup analysis: As I detail above, 
                Minnesota is going to be a bit short on healthy and eligible players 
                to start the season, which is not good for Ponder’s early 
                prospects. Already saddled with two red matchups over the first 
                three weeks, he (and every player tied to him in the passing game) 
                will have a hard time being productive against the Jags or Niners 
                as Peterson continues to recover from his injury and Simpson serves 
                his suspension. Simpson returns just in time to help Harvin and 
                Ponder secure three winnable matchups from Weeks 4-6, but after 
                that point, all Vikings’ players in the passing game besides 
                Harvin and Rudolph should be hands-off in fantasy. The running 
                game is a much bigger question mark simply because we almost need 
                to see first just how much Peterson’s role will change this 
                season. Does he start running strong in Week 4? Week 7? Week 13? 
                For the purposes of this exercise, I have him taking back 
                the reins around Week 6, but I’ll be the first to admit 
                that is still pretty optimistic. Weeks 1 and 3 would be difficult 
                for a healthy Peterson, so we shouldn’t expect Gerhart to 
                fare very well either. Five of the next seven pre-bye games are 
                winnable matchups, but each team could also force the Vikings 
                to abandon the running game with their high-powered offensive 
                attack. After the bye, a less-than-100% Peterson would be bad 
                news against the likes of the Bears (twice), Packers and Texans, 
                assuming each defense is relatively healthy at that point and 
                the Green Bay run defense improves returns to its 2010 form.
 Suggestions, comments, 
                musings about the article or fantasy football in general? E-mail 
                me or follow me on Twitter. 
                
 Doug Orth has written for FF Today 
              since 2006, appeared in USA Today’s Fantasy Football Preview 
              magazine in each of the last two seasons and served as a weekly 
              fantasy football analyst for 106.7 The Fan (WJFK – Washington, 
              D.C). He is also a member of the Fantasy Sports Writers Association.
 |