|  
  
                One of the more commonly-held beliefs in fantasy football is that 
              more opportunity leads to more success. It’s hardly a shocking 
              revelation since it tends to be true quite often in the real world.
  
 A d v e r t i s e m e n t Many will find it surprising that only one player that led the 
                league in “opportunities” (attempts, touches or targets) 
                last year went on to lead his position in fantasy points (Calvin 
                Johnson). In fact, he’s the only player over the last two 
                seasons to do so. By comparison, teammate Matthew Stafford (727 
                attempts) shattered the previous NFL record for attempts in a 
                season (691) and finished as the 11th-best quarterback. Simply 
                put, the most opportunity does not necessarily lead to the most 
                success; there are simply too many other factors at work in the 
                game of football. The goal of last week’s Red 
                Zone Report was to serve as a main dish to what should be 
                a rather appetizing dessert this week. If red zone play-calling, 
                production and efficiency give us some idea as to what teams and 
                players will do in scoring territory, then it only makes sense 
                that analyzing the number of opportunities that players receive 
                – and the consistency at which they get them – anywhere 
                on the field should help us uncover the most “stable” 
                fantasy properties and potential “boom-or-bust” candidates. 
                While there will always been sudden stars and unexpected occurrences 
                during the course of the season no matter how much we crunch the 
                numbers, fantasy owners that are the least surprised often find 
                themselves in the best position to make a fantasy championship 
                run. Along with the Red Zone Report, my hope is that you simply observe 
                the data I have collected over the last two weeks and reach some 
                solid conclusions about the players that will grace our rosters 
                over the next 1-2 months. Even though September 5 (the Thursday 
                night season opener) is not far away, we still have plenty of 
                time to discuss the overvalued and undervalued fantasy players 
                over the next month as I begin releasing my team projections next 
                week. For now, my advice is to just focus on the information and 
                draw some conclusions on your own as you sort through the information. 
                The goal, as always, is to make sure you are easily the most knowledgeable 
                and informed owner in the room on draft day. After each chart, you will find some statistical observations 
                followed by a “fantasy impact” section. Although I 
                tried to mix one in with the other in order to keep it light, 
                my hope is that you focus mostly on the information below that 
                you will be hard-pressed to find anywhere else. 
  Key to the table below: Fant – Player’s rank 
                in a PPR fantasy league where all touchdowns are worth six points.
 0-20% - This column represents the 
                percentage of games in which a quarterback attempted 20 throws 
                or less. (By extension, 21-30% represents the percentage of games 
                a quarterback attempted between 21-30 passes, and so on.)
 
 0-20 - This column represents the 
                actual number of games in which a quarterback attempted 20 throws 
                or less. (Just like the sentence above, 21-30 represents the number 
                of games a quarterback attempted between 21-30 passes, and so 
                on.)
 
 Note #1: Quarterbacks 
                had to play in at least eight games. “**” denotes 
                a player – Nick Foles in this case – that did not 
                make the cut but figure to have some impact in 2013.
 
 Note #2: You may 
                sort the table by clicking on the column headers.
 
                
                   
                    | Quarterback 
                      Attempts - 2012 |   
                    | Rk | Fant | QB | Tm | G | 0-20% | 21-30% | 0-30% | 31-40% | 40+% | 31+% | 0-20 | 21-30 | 0-30 | 31-40 | 40+ | 31+ |  
                    | 1 | 1 | Drew Brees | NO | 16 | 0.0% | 12.5% | 12.5% | 25.0% | 62.5% | 87.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 14 |  
                    | 2 | 2 | Aaron Rodgers | GB | 16 | 0.0% | 25.0% | 25.0% | 62.5% | 12.5% | 75.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 2 | 12 |  
                    | 3 | 3 | Tom Brady | NE | 16 | 0.0% | 6.3% | 6.3% | 56.3% | 37.5% | 93.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 15 |  
                    | 4 | 4 | Peyton Manning | DEN | 16 | 0.0% | 18.8% | 18.8% | 56.3% | 25.0% | 81.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 4 | 13 |  
                    | 5 | 5 | Matt Ryan | ATL | 16 | 0.0% | 12.5% | 12.5% | 56.3% | 31.3% | 87.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 14 |  
                    | 6 | 6 | Cam Newton | CAR | 16 | 6.3% | 43.8% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 0.0% | 50.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |  
                    | 7 | 7 | Robert Griffin III | WAS | 15 | 20.0% | 53.3% | 73.3% | 26.7% | 0.0% | 26.7% | 3 | 8 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 4 |  
                    | 8 | 8 | Tony Romo | DAL | 16 | 0.0% | 18.8% | 18.8% | 37.5% | 43.8% | 81.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 13 |  
                    | 9 | 9 | Russell Wilson | SEA | 16 | 25.0% | 56.3% | 81.3% | 18.8% | 0.0% | 18.8% | 4 | 9 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 3 |  
                    | 10 | 10 | Andrew Luck | IND | 16 | 0.0% | 25.0% | 25.0% | 31.3% | 43.8% | 75.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 12 |  
                    | 11 | 11 | Matthew Stafford | DET | 16 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 18.8% | 81.3% | 100.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 16 |  
                    | 12 | 12 | Andy Dalton | CIN | 16 | 6.3% | 37.5% | 43.8% | 31.3% | 25.0% | 56.3% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 9 |  
                    | 13 | 13 | Josh Freeman | TB | 16 | 6.3% | 37.5% | 43.8% | 31.3% | 25.0% | 56.3% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 9 |  
                    | 14 | 14 | Eli Manning | NYG | 16 | 0.0% | 43.8% | 43.8% | 37.5% | 18.8% | 56.3% | 0 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 9 |  
                    | 15 | 15 | Joe Flacco | BAL | 16 | 6.3% | 31.3% | 37.5% | 37.5% | 25.0% | 62.5% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 10 |  
                    | 16 | 16 | Ben Roethlisberger | PIT | 13 | 7.7% | 23.1% | 30.8% | 53.8% | 15.4% | 69.2% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 9 |  
                    | 17 | 17 | Matt Schaub | HOU | 16 | 0.0% | 31.3% | 31.3% | 56.3% | 12.5% | 68.8% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 2 | 11 |  
                    | 18 | 18 | Sam Bradford | STL | 16 | 6.3% | 31.3% | 37.5% | 43.8% | 18.8% | 62.5% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 10 |  
                    | 19 | 19 | Carson Palmer | OAK | 15 | 6.7% | 13.3% | 20.0% | 40.0% | 40.0% | 80.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 12 |  
                    | 20 | 20 | Ryan Fitzpatrick | BUF | 16 | 12.5% | 18.8% | 31.3% | 68.8% | 0.0% | 68.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 0 | 11 |  
                    | 21 | 21 | Philip Rivers | SD | 16 | 12.5% | 18.8% | 31.3% | 43.8% | 25.0% | 68.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 11 |  
                    | 22 | 22 | Christian Ponder | MIN | 16 | 12.5% | 43.8% | 56.3% | 31.3% | 12.5% | 43.8% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 7 |  
                    | 23 | 23 | Jay Cutler | CHI | 15 | 6.7% | 46.7% | 53.3% | 40.0% | 6.7% | 46.7% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 7 |  
                    | 24 | 24 | Ryan Tannehill | MIA | 16 | 6.3% | 50.0% | 56.3% | 37.5% | 6.3% | 43.8% | 1 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 7 |  
                    | 25 | 25 | Brandon Weeden | CLE | 15 | 6.7% | 26.7% | 33.3% | 46.7% | 20.0% | 66.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 10 |  
                    | 26 | 26 | Colin Kaepernick | SF | 13 | 46.2% | 38.5% | 84.6% | 15.4% | 0.0% | 15.4% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 2 |  
                    | 27 | 27 | Michael Vick | PHI | 10 | 10.0% | 20.0% | 30.0% | 40.0% | 30.0% | 70.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 7 |  
                    | 28 | 28 | Jake Locker | TEN | 11 | 18.2% | 36.4% | 54.5% | 18.2% | 27.3% | 45.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 5 |  
                    | 29 | 29 | Alex Smith | SF | 10 | 30.0% | 50.0% | 80.0% | 20.0% | 0.0% | 20.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 2 |  
                    | 30 | 30 | Mark Sanchez | NYJ | 15 | 20.0% | 40.0% | 60.0% | 20.0% | 20.0% | 40.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 6 |  
                    | 31 | 31 | Chad Henne | JAC | 10 | 30.0% | 10.0% | 40.0% | 20.0% | 40.0% | 60.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 6 |  
                    | 32 | 32 | Blaine Gabbert | JAC | 10 | 30.0% | 10.0% | 40.0% | 50.0% | 10.0% | 60.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 6 |  
                    | 33 | 34 | Nick Foles** | PHI | 7 | 0.0% | 14.3% | 14.3% | 42.9% | 42.9% | 85.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 |  
                    | 34 | 35 | Matt Cassel | KC | 9 | 22.2% | 22.2% | 44.4% | 22.2% | 33.3% | 55.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 5 |  
                    | 35 | 36 | Matt Hasselbeck | TEN | 8 | 25.0% | 25.0% | 50.0% | 25.0% | 25.0% | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 |  
                    | 36 | 37 | Brady Quinn | KC | 10 | 40.0% | 40.0% | 80.0% | 20.0% | 0.0% | 20.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 2 |   Observations: In 2011, only five 
                of the top 10 quarterbacks that ranked in the top 10 in highest 
                percentage of games over 31 attempts (31+) finished in the top 
                10 in fantasy points. In 2012, the number increased to six. Why 
                is this notable? Given the number of teams that could/did run 
                read-option plays, the majority of the top 10 was still ruled 
                by the quarterbacks that are primarily pocket passers. For the second year in a row, we saw the law of diminishing returns 
                at quarterback; more volume didn’t necessarily lead to more 
                fantasy points – although 2012 did see more quarterbacks 
                thrive with the extra work. Of the 12 quarterbacks that played 
                at least 15-16 games and attempted 41+ throws in at least 25% 
                of their games, 10 finished among the top 15. In 2011, only nine 
                signal-callers met that threshold and six were top-15 quarterbacks. While 41+% doesn’t appear to be as great of a predictor 
                for fantasy success as it should be, the number of games in which 
                signal-callers recorded 41+ attempts proved to be a good benchmark 
                to reach in 2012. Of the 13 quarterbacks to post four or more 
                games with 41+ attempts, 10 finished in the top 15 in fantasy 
                points. Only Palmer (constantly in comeback mode), Henne (part-time 
                starter) and Rivers (awful offensive line) found themselves on 
                the outside looking in. In 2011, it was six of 12. The read-option did make a rather sizable impact last season. 
                In 2011, only Rodgers (46.7), Newton (37.5) and Ryan (31.3) finished 
                among the top 16 fantasy quarterbacks with at least 30% of their 
                games falling into the 0-30% category. In 2012, three of the top 
                11 – Wilson, Griffin and Newton ranked among the top 10 
                fantasy quarterbacks while Kaepernick would have almost certainly 
                been included in that group had he been named the starter before 
                Week 11.
 Fantasy impact: Although more 
                attempts would seem to be more of a good thing, remember why quarterbacks 
                often air it out that often: because their team is trailing. Defenses 
                are willing to trade yards in order to melt the clock, but quarterbacks 
                often force throws in those situations in an effort to move the 
                ball downfield quicker. High-risk plays can be big plays…for 
                either side. After the elite signal-callers are gone, targeting 
                a non-elite quarterback that lives in the 31-40 attempt neighborhood 
                is a solid move for fantasy owners. Elite quarterbacks (Peyton 
                Manning, Brady, Brees, etc.) have earned the right from their 
                coaches to attempt more throws because they have proven they will 
                not put the offense in harm’s way, regardless of the situation. Stafford was last year’s best example that sheer volume 
                doesn’t mean everything; very few quarterbacks can overcome 
                the loss of their explosive pass-catching back (Jahvid Best) and 
                three receivers (Nate Burleson, Titus Young and Ryan Broyles) 
                who all figured prominently into their plans going into last season. 
                Conversely, Rodgers has proven two years in a row the combination 
                of running ability and passing efficiency means a lot; only three 
                of his 31 games over the past two seasons have featured more than 
                41 attempts. (He has accumulated 17 games of 31-40 attempts and 
                11 with fewer than 30 throws.)
 Running 
                Backs
  Suggestions, comments, 
                musings about the article or fantasy football in general? E-mail 
                me or follow me on Twitter. 
                
 Doug Orth has written for FF Today since 2006 and appeared in 
              USA Today’s Fantasy Football Preview magazine in 2010 and 
              2011. He hosted USA Today’s hour-long, pre-kickoff fantasy 
              football internet chat every Sunday this past season. Doug regularly 
              appears as a fantasy football analyst on Sirius XM’s “Fantasy 
              Drive” and for 106.7 The Fan (WJFK – Washington, D.C). 
              He is also a member of the Fantasy Sports Writers Association.
 |