A d v e r t i s e m e n t
In case you hadn’t noticed, fantasy
football is a bit like my full-time job away from my full-time
job. And there is nothing wrong with that; there’s a big
difference between working hard at something you love to do and
simply working hard just to earn a paycheck.
As fantasy football continues to grow year after year, so does
the sophistication of the average football fan. When I first started
Preseason Matchup Analysis for public consumption back in 2008,
it was a noble concept that needed more information than I had
available to me at the time. As more and more sites have found
their way into the public consciousness and established certain
metrics that help break down the game, my knowledge of the game
and ability to deliver a finer product has also increased. In
the beginning, it was enough to consider a team like Baltimore
or Pittsburgh to be bad news for every fantasy player they faced.
Now, my PMAs consider factors such as the likelihood of how often
a certain receiver will play in the slot against how often he
may square off against the defense’s best corner –
and how he matches up against him physically. While it is a long
process, it is a worthwhile exercise.
It is this kind of painstaking detail that I believe sets “Preseason
Matchup Analysis” apart from any other projection method
in the business. While last year’s ranks and numbers are
considered when predicting game-by-game totals, consistently successful
prognosticators and fantasy owners typically “see the future”
better than their counterparts. No method is foolproof or all-encompassing;
for every Doug Martin, Arian Foster or Eric Decker breakout I
get right, there will always the players like Cecil Shorts that
go from third- or fourth-string on their team’s depth chart
to fantasy stardom.
Also, every set of projections has some bias attached to them;
the trick is running the bias through enough filters in order
to minimize the impact of it, which I believe this method does.
One of the main tenets of my method is based on the notion that
elite players will be elite about 75% of the time or more regardless
of the matchup. But elite fantasy players are simply the foundation
of your team. In order to consistently make the playoffs and succeed
in the fantasy postseason, “little things” such as
potential matchups play a vital role in determining which good
players will perform at an elite level in that week. This method
is all about increasing your likelihood of success during the
playoffs – a time where there is usually very little separating
each of the remaining teams.
Quite often, the best businesses (and their practices) in the
real world are the ones that are the most transparent and adaptable
to change. It’s hard to be more transparent than I am each
year with my projections. As for the ability to change, one preseason
injury to a key offensive player can cause a ripple effect to
the entire team’s projections while an injury to a key defensive
player can do the same to each of their opponents. While it sounds
like a lot of work – and it is – it is necessary because
those “ripple effects” are felt on the field as well.
(Art imitating reality…what a wonderful concept!)
Here’s a quick explanation of what each of the colors mean
in each team’s projection chart below:
Red – A very difficult matchup.
For lower-level players, a red matchup means they should not be
used in fantasy that week. For a second- or third-tier player,
drop your expectations for them at least one grade that week (i.e.
from WR2 to WR3). For elite players, expect them to perform one
level lower than their usual status (i.e. RB1 performs like a
RB2).
Yellow – Keep expectations
fairly low in this matchup. For lower-level players, a yellow
matchup is a borderline start at best. For a second- or third-tier
player, they can probably overcome the matchup if things fall
right. For the elite players, expect slightly better than average
production.
White – Basically, this matchup
is one that could go either way. In some cases, I just don’t
feel like I have a good feel yet for this defense. Generally speaking,
these matchups are winnable matchups for all levels of players.
Green – It doesn’t
get much better than this. For non-elite players, the stage is
basically set for said player to exploit the matchup. For the
elite player, this matchup should produce special numbers.
For an example as to the amount of possibilities and factors
I consider, take a look below at New England’s projections.
Danny Amendola does not have a single “red” on his
schedule because most defenses that have clear No. 1 CBs usually
have them play certain sides of the field and do not use them
as “shadows”. And for the teams that use “shadows”,
almost none of them use that player to guard a slot receiver,
which is where Amendola will spend a great deal of his time. And
really, that is just the tip of the iceberg when I hammer out
these projections. As you can tell, a lot of thought goes into
this.
Here are some final notes to help you understand what you see
below in the tables:
Notes:
- The gray highlight in each team’s schedule reflects
a road game and the numbers above them correspond to the weeks
of the season.
- These are my initial projections and therefore subject
to change. In a few cases, the changes will be dramatic. Changes
may come in the form of a different-colored matchup and/or a
player’s “game log”. In some cases, a strong
preseason may warrant the inclusion of one name in a team projection
and the removal of another.
- For all those readers whose eyes gravitate immediately
to the player’s final numbers: they are 15-game totals
because most fantasy seasons have a Week 16 title game. Additionally,
players with fewer than 10 projected catches or 100 projected
yards have been removed, which will explain the discrepancy
in some of the quarterback’s final numbers.
- The age you see by each player will be that player’s
age as of September 1, 2013.
Key to the table below:
PPR Aver - Points
per game in full-point PPR leagues where all touchdowns are worth
six points.
NPPR Aver - Points per game in non-PPR
leagues where all touchdowns are worth six points.
PPR - Total points scored in PPR
Non-PPR - Total points scored in
non-PPR.
AFC East
Buffalo Bills |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NE |
CAR |
NYJ |
BAL |
CLE |
CIN |
MIA |
NO |
KC |
PIT |
NYJ |
bye |
ATL |
TB |
JAC |
MIA |
QB |
Kevin Kolb |
29 |
16.5 |
16.5 |
132.1 |
132.1 |
1740 |
|
240 |
185 |
160 |
INJ |
INJ |
285 |
275 |
340 |
190 |
65 |
BEN |
|
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
2 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
BEN |
|
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
2 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
BEN |
|
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
5 |
10 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
5 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
5 |
BEN |
|
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
BEN |
|
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QB |
EJ
Manuel |
23 |
15.4 |
15.4 |
138.3 |
138.3 |
1770 |
|
|
|
110 |
185 |
205 |
|
|
|
|
85 |
220 |
|
265 |
215 |
275 |
210 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
1 |
|
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
2 |
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
35 |
25 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
25 |
|
40 |
15 |
25 |
15 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
C.J. Spiller |
26 |
19.5 |
15.5 |
293 |
233 |
1205 |
|
85 |
130 |
55 |
70 |
125 |
70 |
30 |
65 |
105 |
65 |
105 |
|
55 |
50 |
120 |
75 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
525 |
|
50 |
25 |
60 |
20 |
15 |
75 |
0 |
60 |
40 |
20 |
20 |
|
65 |
25 |
15 |
35 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
5 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
|
7 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Fred Jackson |
32 |
9.3 |
7.9 |
121.5 |
102.5 |
520 |
|
45 |
35 |
30 |
25 |
40 |
40 |
65 |
35 |
INJ |
INJ |
45 |
|
30 |
40 |
65 |
25 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
5 |
0 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
25 |
20 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
|
10 |
0 |
25 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Steve Johnson |
27 |
15.2 |
10 |
228 |
150 |
1080 |
|
65 |
55 |
80 |
40 |
50 |
85 |
105 |
90 |
70 |
40 |
135 |
|
85 |
55 |
85 |
40 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
5 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
7 |
6 |
5 |
3 |
10 |
|
5 |
4 |
6 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Robert Woods |
21 |
8.1 |
4.9 |
121 |
74 |
560 |
|
35 |
20 |
45 |
50 |
45 |
30 |
25 |
45 |
35 |
45 |
15 |
|
40 |
65 |
25 |
40 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
3 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Da’Rick
Rogers |
22 |
6 |
3.8 |
77.5 |
49.5 |
375 |
|
15 |
0 |
20 |
25 |
60 |
INJ |
70 |
45 |
25 |
INJ |
40 |
|
20 |
0 |
35 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
1 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
INJ |
4 |
4 |
2 |
INJ |
4 |
|
2 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
T.J. Graham |
24 |
3.3 |
2.3 |
50 |
34 |
280 |
|
35 |
60 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
10 |
25 |
25 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
|
0 |
25 |
55 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
2 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Marquise Goodwin |
22 |
1.6 |
1.2 |
24.5 |
17.5 |
115 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
55 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
10 |
15 |
0 |
10 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Scott Chandler |
28 |
4.2 |
2.9 |
63.5 |
43.5 |
195 |
|
15 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
20 |
30 |
15 |
0 |
20 |
15 |
10 |
|
15 |
0 |
25 |
10 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Chris Gragg |
23 |
4.5 |
2.6 |
49.5 |
28.5 |
225 |
|
20 |
15 |
40 |
15 |
0 |
40 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
20 |
30 |
10 |
35 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
2 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
2 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
|
General overview: Buffalo added a
lot of young talent on the offensive side of the ball, particularly
at receiver. Woods should be a steady 6-to-10 year pro while Rogers
could easily become the top receiver on the team in a few years
assuming he can stay out of trouble off the field. The Bills hope
they found their future at quarterback with the multi-dimensional
Manuel, but they will almost certainly be in trouble if he becomes
their present at any point this season. However, their strength
– and the focus of new HC Doug Marrone – will be on
the running game and Spiller in particular. Jackson will not be
forgotten, but all indications are that Spiller will finally get
the chance to do what former HC Chan Gailey drafted him to do (but
failed to follow through): be a Jamaal Charles clone and put the
offense on his back.
Matchup analysis: While there is
no extended stretch of weak defenses, Buffalo will start off the
season with two home games, including one against a New England
team that could take a while to find itself and a Panthers’
defense that will likely feature two rookies among their top three
defensive tackles and a defensive backfield that is a huge question
mark beyond top CB Josh Norman. The Bills will play four of six
on the road after hosting Carolina in Week 2, making that stretch
a critical one for an offense that wants to go up-tempo and run
the ball. During that six-week period, it will be difficult for
anyone outside of Spiller and Johnson to maintain any level of
consistency. Spiller’s all-purpose game will make him a
weekly 100 total-yard, one-score threat regardless of the opponent
while Marrone’s willingness to use Johnson in the slot on
a more regular basis – to avoid most teams’ top corners
and double teams – should allow him to take his fantasy
game to another level for as long as Kolb is the starter. By using
his team’s two most dynamic weapons in the manner in which
it appears he will use them, Marrone is setting up the rest of
his team for success despite a difficult schedule. The true wild-card
will be if Graham or Rogers can step up and be a legitimate threat
in addition to Woods, something only time will tell us.
Miami Dolphins |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CLE |
IND |
ATL |
NO |
BAL |
bye |
BUF |
NE |
CIN |
TB |
SD |
CAR |
NYJ |
PIT |
NE |
BUF |
QB |
Ryan Tannehill |
25 |
19.4 |
19.4 |
290.6 |
290.6 |
3940 |
|
230 |
315 |
285 |
265 |
185 |
|
265 |
275 |
300 |
255 |
305 |
290 |
260 |
215 |
225 |
270 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
170 |
|
10 |
5 |
0 |
20 |
15 |
|
25 |
5 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
10 |
5 |
20 |
15 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Lamar Miller |
22 |
15.2 |
12.5 |
228 |
187 |
1125 |
|
65 |
75 |
85 |
110 |
45 |
|
50 |
70 |
75 |
30 |
110 |
120 |
65 |
40 |
75 |
110 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
325 |
|
15 |
35 |
20 |
15 |
15 |
|
35 |
25 |
20 |
55 |
20 |
15 |
10 |
10 |
20 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
2 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
5 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Daniel Thomas |
25 |
4.3 |
3.8 |
51 |
46 |
190 |
|
15 |
15 |
10 |
INJ |
15 |
|
0 |
15 |
10 |
5 |
35 |
INJ |
INJ |
15 |
20 |
35 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
0 |
0 |
5 |
INJ |
0 |
|
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
5 |
5 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
INJ |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Mike Gillislee |
22 |
3.5 |
2.5 |
48.5 |
35.5 |
190 |
|
0 |
10 |
15 |
15 |
30 |
|
20 |
10 |
20 |
10 |
0 |
25 |
25 |
INJ |
10 |
0 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
5 |
10 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
|
10 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
INJ |
10 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
INJ |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Mike Wallace |
27 |
15.3 |
10.8 |
229.5 |
161.5 |
1135 |
|
35 |
110 |
90 |
120 |
50 |
|
35 |
80 |
110 |
40 |
125 |
115 |
40 |
75 |
50 |
60 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
3 |
7 |
5 |
6 |
3 |
|
2 |
6 |
7 |
3 |
6 |
6 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Brian Hartline |
26 |
10.5 |
6.8 |
157.5 |
102.5 |
785 |
|
60 |
45 |
70 |
75 |
35 |
|
60 |
50 |
35 |
55 |
40 |
45 |
70 |
35 |
45 |
65 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
5 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
2 |
|
5 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Brandon Gibson |
26 |
3.4 |
2.1 |
51 |
31 |
250 |
|
15 |
0 |
25 |
10 |
0 |
|
40 |
0 |
30 |
15 |
0 |
55 |
20 |
25 |
15 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
3 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Armon Binns |
23 |
2.3 |
1.2 |
34 |
18 |
180 |
|
20 |
10 |
15 |
0 |
10 |
|
15 |
25 |
30 |
10 |
15 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Rishard Matthews |
23 |
2.7 |
1.9 |
41 |
28 |
220 |
|
25 |
40 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
|
15 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
35 |
10 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
40 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Dustin Keller |
28 |
11.5 |
7.4 |
172.5 |
110.5 |
745 |
|
45 |
65 |
35 |
25 |
50 |
|
45 |
55 |
70 |
35 |
50 |
50 |
80 |
25 |
70 |
45 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
4 |
6 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
|
3 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
2 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Charles Clay |
24 |
2.6 |
1.5 |
39.5 |
22.5 |
165 |
|
10 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
15 |
|
10 |
15 |
0 |
35 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
25 |
0 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
1 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
General overview: GM Jeff Ireland is going for broke in a way only
redraft fantasy owners could love. Wallace may not have been the
greatest “scheme fit” per se, but he was the best receiver
on the market and landed on a team desperate for his big-play ability.
Keller adds a presence at tight end the team hasn’t seen since
the days of a young (and productive) Randy McMichael. The Dolphins
have thrown their belief behind new LT Jonathan Martin –who
will take over for Jake Long – but smartly nabbed one of the
better free-agent options to replace Martin at right tackle in Tyson
Clabo. The team has been singing the praises all offseason of Miller,
who should be the lead back – if not the feature back –
assuming he shows the kind of pass-protection chops he has displayed
in mini-camp and OTAs. Tannehill surpassed expectations in a big
way as a rookie considering Hartline was his top option. A common
NFL axiom says players improve the most between their first and
second season, which puts Tannehill in prime position to be a top
12-15 fantasy quarterback with all of his new weapons.
Matchup analysis: Assuming new Browns DC Ray Horton will use
CB Joe Haden as a “shadow”, Wallace could have a difficult
Week 1, but he has a great shot of going into the bye with at
least three high-quality starts. His post-bye slate is a different
story as he’ll likely see plenty of the Bills’ Stephon
Gilmore (twice), a potentially healthy Darrelle Revis and Antonio
Cromartie – just to name a few. The way their matchups line
up this season, it is possible most of Keller’s good games
will come during Wallace’s “off” games. The
pre-bye schedule is loaded with solid cover safeties, but the
post-bye part is not, meaning it will be important for the offensive
braintrust to be creative with their formations early on in order
to get Keller matched up with a linebacker as often as possible.
Hartline will obviously not see another 74-catch season anytime
soon, but there aren’t many opponents on the schedule with
the personnel to match up comfortably with him now that he is
the No. 2 receiver. In other words, Hartline – and the entire
passing game for that matter – should be much more consistent
in 2013. Somewhat like Spiller, Miller’s versatility should
keep his value afloat despite a challenging list of tough run
defenses from the AFC North, Tampa Bay and the improved units
in Miami’s own division (Jets and Bills). Unlike last season,
Tannehill has enough firepower to compete against any defense,
so it will be critical that he can make the transition from being
a signal-caller reliant on Hartline in 2012 to a spread-the-wealth
quarterback in 2013. He’s more than capable of doing just
that.
New England Patriots |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BUF |
NYJ |
TB |
ATL |
CIN |
NO |
NYJ |
MIA |
PIT |
bye |
CAR |
DEN |
HOU |
CLE |
MIA |
BAL |
QB |
Tom Brady |
36 |
20.3 |
20.3 |
304.8 |
304.8 |
4070 |
|
240 |
290 |
255 |
345 |
255 |
310 |
245 |
185 |
220 |
|
270 |
265 |
315 |
330 |
285 |
260 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Stevan Ridley |
24 |
12.1 |
11.7 |
181 |
175 |
1100 |
|
85 |
100 |
55 |
90 |
70 |
120 |
90 |
35 |
60 |
|
110 |
60 |
70 |
90 |
45 |
20 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
0 |
5 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
|
10 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Shane Vereen |
24 |
14.8 |
10.4 |
177.5 |
124.5 |
405 |
|
40 |
25 |
25 |
35 |
20 |
20 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
20 |
30 |
25 |
65 |
70 |
30 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
480 |
|
55 |
25 |
70 |
50 |
35 |
50 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
15 |
65 |
25 |
40 |
35 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
5 |
3 |
7 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
3 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Brandon Bolden |
23 |
4.5 |
4.2 |
67.5 |
63.5 |
430 |
|
15 |
20 |
5 |
15 |
20 |
45 |
30 |
70 |
35 |
|
85 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
50 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Danny Amendola |
27 |
17.1 |
9.9 |
205.5 |
118.5 |
945 |
|
75 |
105 |
80 |
105 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
60 |
75 |
|
85 |
55 |
75 |
105 |
85 |
40 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
8 |
10 |
7 |
9 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
6 |
8 |
|
8 |
5 |
6 |
8 |
8 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Julian Edelman |
27 |
9.2 |
5.3 |
101.5 |
58.5 |
465 |
|
40 |
50 |
25 |
30 |
75 |
85 |
40 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
INJ |
INJ |
45 |
25 |
15 |
35 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
4 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
7 |
8 |
4 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
INJ |
INJ |
4 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Aaron Dobson |
22 |
7.5 |
4.9 |
112 |
74 |
560 |
|
35 |
45 |
55 |
65 |
50 |
35 |
30 |
0 |
30 |
|
60 |
20 |
35 |
25 |
45 |
30 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
2 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
|
4 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Donald Jones |
25 |
5.6 |
3.1 |
84 |
47 |
410 |
|
25 |
20 |
0 |
30 |
30 |
25 |
55 |
40 |
20 |
|
35 |
15 |
20 |
45 |
15 |
35 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
2 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
4 |
2 |
|
3 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Josh Boyce |
23 |
2.7 |
2 |
40.5 |
30.5 |
245 |
|
0 |
20 |
0 |
35 |
0 |
45 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
|
0 |
45 |
50 |
0 |
0 |
40 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Rob Gronkowski |
24 |
15.5 |
10.1 |
170 |
111 |
690 |
|
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
45 |
70 |
85 |
65 |
60 |
|
50 |
60 |
50 |
70 |
80 |
55 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
4 |
6 |
8 |
5 |
5 |
|
5 |
6 |
4 |
6 |
6 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Zach Sudfield |
24 |
2.5 |
1.5 |
38 |
22 |
160 |
|
10 |
20 |
15 |
25 |
10 |
0 |
20 |
15 |
0 |
|
15 |
0 |
10 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
General overview: The Patriots are annually one of the more difficult
teams to project each season, but this year will be more difficult
than most with so many questions and so few answers. Aaron Hernandez
is in jail, Wes Welker and Danny Woodhead are gone while Gronkowski’s
injury status is uncertain. Most of the replacements (potential
replacement in Gronk’s case) are young and none of them are
as decorated or as good as the departed/injured players. The common
belief is that New England will lean more heavily on the running
game and use Vereen as its new “matchup nightmare”,
but don’t discount the possibility of the Patriots only slightly
dialing down their slot-heavy passing offense, using Amendola and
Edelman to fill the void inside the hashmarks left behind by Welker
and Hernandez.
Matchup analysis: Because Amendola will be doing most of his
damage from the slot, his fantasy owners don’t have a lot
to worry about for most of the season until the second half of
the season when he could square off against top-10 slot CBs –
per Pro Football Focus – Chris Harris (Denver) and Brice
McCain (Houston) as well as renowned Ravens slot CB Lardarius
Webb. The road will not be nearly as smooth for whichever receiver
wins Brandon Lloyd’s old job – be it Edelman, Dobson,
Jones or even Michael Jenkins. It is another reason why Vereen
should be on fantasy owners’ radar as a high-upside RB3
in PPR leagues since he will more than likely assume all of Woodhead’s
116 offensive touches from a season ago and then some, regardless
of whether or not Gronkowski misses significant regular-season
action. New England has actually possessed one of the better run-blocking
offensive lines in recent years and is young enough up front to
keep it going for a while longer, so whatever the Patriots’
running backs lost in terms of the space created by the passing
game, they should make up for in 2013 with volume. New England
faces some potentially difficult matchups against the run in Tampa
Bay, Pittsburgh, Houston and Baltimore – to name a few –
but should rank among the top rushing teams in the league again
in 2013.
New York Jets |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TB |
NE |
BUF |
TEN |
ATL |
PIT |
NE |
CIN |
NO |
bye |
BUF |
BAL |
MIA |
OAK |
CAR |
CLE |
QB |
Mark Sanchez |
26 |
9.7 |
9.7 |
87 |
87 |
1600 |
|
135 |
135 |
220 |
245 |
155 |
170 |
235 |
200 |
105 |
|
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
|
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
BEN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QB |
Geno Smith |
22 |
10 |
10 |
100.2 |
100.2 |
1455 |
|
55 |
30 |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
260 |
175 |
215 |
155 |
235 |
140 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
5 |
0 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
10 |
10 |
15 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Chris Ivory |
25 |
11.2 |
10.4 |
146 |
135 |
830 |
|
35 |
55 |
65 |
INJ |
55 |
45 |
35 |
80 |
110 |
|
55 |
40 |
INJ |
120 |
75 |
60 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
INJ |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
INJ |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
15 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
10 |
5 |
0 |
15 |
|
20 |
10 |
INJ |
10 |
15 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
2 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
2 |
1 |
INJ |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Bilal Powell |
24 |
4.4 |
3.5 |
61 |
49 |
280 |
|
15 |
20 |
15 |
75 |
15 |
25 |
5 |
0 |
35 |
|
10 |
20 |
25 |
10 |
INJ |
10 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
0 |
10 |
10 |
20 |
15 |
15 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
|
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Mike Goodson |
26 |
10.5 |
7.8 |
125.5 |
93.5 |
385 |
|
25 |
30 |
35 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
50 |
25 |
10 |
|
40 |
25 |
55 |
35 |
35 |
20 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
310 |
|
35 |
20 |
15 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
25 |
30 |
55 |
|
20 |
15 |
25 |
15 |
40 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
3 |
2 |
3 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
2 |
4 |
3 |
|
2 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Santonio Holmes |
29 |
8.3 |
5.1 |
49.5 |
30.5 |
245 |
|
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
|
25 |
40 |
35 |
55 |
70 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
PUP |
|
2 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Stephen Hill |
22 |
8.8 |
5.9 |
106 |
71 |
530 |
|
0 |
20 |
40 |
55 |
80 |
35 |
40 |
55 |
35 |
|
65 |
45 |
60 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
0 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
|
5 |
3 |
3 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Jeremy Kerley |
24 |
9.3 |
5.7 |
140 |
85 |
670 |
|
40 |
65 |
45 |
70 |
40 |
25 |
30 |
55 |
75 |
|
45 |
10 |
55 |
30 |
20 |
65 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
3 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
|
4 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Ben Obomanu |
29 |
5 |
2.9 |
75 |
44 |
380 |
|
35 |
25 |
50 |
30 |
10 |
30 |
50 |
20 |
25 |
|
20 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
45 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
3 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
|
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Jeff Cumberland |
26 |
5.1 |
3 |
77 |
45 |
330 |
|
30 |
25 |
35 |
40 |
20 |
15 |
40 |
30 |
0 |
|
20 |
25 |
0 |
20 |
20 |
10 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
3 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
|
2 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Hayden Smith |
28 |
3.7 |
2.4 |
55 |
36 |
240 |
|
10 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
15 |
40 |
20 |
0 |
15 |
|
45 |
20 |
15 |
25 |
0 |
10 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
|
3 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
|
General overview: Like just about every other team in this division,
there is a great deal of uncertainty on offense. However, no team
is in worse shape than the Jets, who will enter training camp with
a quarterback “competition” and very little proven (or
healthy) talent at receiver. New York dropped OC Tony Sparano in
the offseason and replaced him with West Coast offense aficionado
Marty Mornhinweg, but the play-calling upgrade will mean very little
unless Sanchez or Smith can pull a rabbit out of their hat. (In
fact, Mornhinweg should be declared an offensive mastermind and
in line for another head-coaching job in 2014 if he is able to make
this passing game respectable.) As of mid-June, Holmes was still
unable to run or cut on his surgically-repaired foot following his
grade-four Lisfranc fracture – the most serious kind. Hill
(knee) is also recovering from a surgery, but showed very little
after Week 1 and isn’t a great fit for the new offense. The
only intriguing fantasy option might be Ivory, but even that optimism
should be tempered due to his violent running style and the likelihood
he will miss some games because of it. Goodson could be an excellent
complement and a top fantasy handcuff, but he will likely be facing
some kind of punishment from the league and/or legal system at some
point this season and isn’t the most durable player to boot.
Matchup analysis: Due to the personnel shortcomings of ex-GM
Mike Tannenbaum, the Jets have a number of offensive position
“battles” and very little in terms of clarity. About
the only thing that seems certain is that Ivory will carry the
load for as long as he can; although between high-scoring offenses
that could make the Jets abandon the running game early and tough
rushing defenses, Ivory will have his work cut out for him throughout
most of his schedule. The ex-Saint could be a fantasy playoff
stud assuming the Raiders and Panthers don’t make an incredible
leap in their ability to stop the run, however. Sanchez will probably
begin the season as the starter despite playing about as poorly
as he could have last season, but is almost certain to lose his
job at some point to Smith. The rookie should be an upgrade, but
expecting him to provide some kind of spark with the Jets’
mediocre talent at receiver and their difficult schedule is asking
a lot. (In the interest of full disclosure, my expectation is
that Holmes will begin the regular season on the Physically Unable
to Perform list, which is why his highlights match Hill’s
over that time.) It is rare to write off an entire half of one
team’s offense before the season starts, but there is no
guarantee Holmes will return to the field healthy or that Hill
will take a huge stride forward, leaving Kerley as the receiver
most likely to carry the most fantasy value.
NFC East
Dallas Cowboys |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NYG |
KC |
STL |
SD |
DEN |
WAS |
PHI |
DET |
MIN |
NO |
bye |
NYG |
OAK |
CHI |
GB |
WAS |
QB |
Tony Romo |
33 |
22.3 |
22.3 |
334.4 |
334.4 |
4360 |
|
315 |
245 |
230 |
285 |
310 |
315 |
275 |
290 |
235 |
335 |
|
335 |
290 |
260 |
350 |
290 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
|
0 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
0 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
|
10 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
DeMarco Murray |
25 |
16.9 |
13.9 |
202.5 |
166.5 |
950 |
|
75 |
85 |
115 |
80 |
50 |
35 |
110 |
45 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
INJ |
150 |
85 |
45 |
75 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
INJ |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
295 |
|
35 |
15 |
25 |
10 |
45 |
10 |
10 |
25 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
INJ |
15 |
25 |
55 |
25 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
INJ |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
4 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
INJ |
1 |
4 |
7 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Joseph Randle |
21 |
7.4 |
5.9 |
111.5 |
88.5 |
485 |
|
20 |
25 |
15 |
10 |
35 |
25 |
15 |
70 |
45 |
85 |
|
45 |
15 |
20 |
45 |
15 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
15 |
10 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
25 |
20 |
20 |
|
15 |
5 |
0 |
15 |
5 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
|
3 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Dez Bryant |
24 |
19.9 |
13.9 |
298.5 |
208.5 |
1365 |
|
85 |
60 |
65 |
115 |
45 |
110 |
125 |
105 |
55 |
120 |
|
110 |
90 |
85 |
95 |
100 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
6 |
4 |
4 |
8 |
3 |
7 |
9 |
6 |
4 |
7 |
|
7 |
6 |
7 |
6 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Miles Austin |
29 |
11.9 |
7.7 |
167 |
108 |
780 |
|
45 |
45 |
55 |
75 |
35 |
50 |
80 |
INJ |
85 |
55 |
|
45 |
80 |
45 |
35 |
50 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
INJ |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
4 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
INJ |
6 |
4 |
|
3 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Dwayne Harris |
25 |
3.5 |
2.1 |
42.5 |
25.5 |
195 |
|
25 |
20 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
20 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
15 |
0 |
35 |
25 |
30 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
1 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Terrance Williams |
23 |
6 |
4.4 |
90 |
66 |
420 |
|
30 |
35 |
25 |
0 |
25 |
50 |
0 |
50 |
0 |
55 |
|
45 |
55 |
10 |
40 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
|
3 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Jason Witten |
31 |
14 |
8.1 |
210 |
121 |
970 |
|
70 |
55 |
40 |
60 |
120 |
65 |
50 |
75 |
60 |
70 |
|
85 |
30 |
60 |
75 |
55 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
7 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
12 |
6 |
4 |
10 |
4 |
7 |
|
6 |
2 |
6 |
6 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Gavin Escobar |
22 |
2.6 |
1.7 |
39.5 |
25.5 |
135 |
|
10 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
|
20 |
15 |
0 |
10 |
25 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
General overview: From a personnel perspective, very little has
changed in Dallas. Outside of adding a fifth-round rookie in Randle
the team hopes can “mirror” Murray, the only other notable
change among the skill positions is at receiver – where either
Harris or Williams is expected to win the job behind Bryant and
Austin. However, the Cowboys did not maintain the status quo as
owner Jerry Jones stripped the play-calling duties from Jason Garrett
and gave them to Bill Callahan, who is expected to place more of
the offensive responsibility on the running game. It’s a noble
goal, but Murray will have to stay healthy for the first time in
his NFL career in order for the Cowboys to stick with it since Randle
lacks the third-year back’s game-breaking talent. The addition
of first-round G-C Travis Frederick should help immensely, but it
will be important for the team to stay healthy up front this season
in order to execute Callahan’s vision. Witten is a proven
chain-mover and Bryant took a huge step forward in 2012 to become
the team’s go-to receiver, so Callahan’s plan to bring
more balance to the offense will probably only last as long as Murray
can remain off the injury report.
Matchup analysis: In addition to matching up with at least two
rebuilding teams in the AFC West, a game against New Orleans and
a division full of teams with average-at-best cornerbacks –
outside of its own – Dallas has enough plus-matchups to
do some damage in the passing game if it chooses to go that route
at some point. Kansas City, St. Louis and Denver will each challenge
Bryant and Austin over the first five weeks, but beyond that,
it could be argued that Minnesota and Chicago are the only teams
that should make their owners pause over the remainder of the
fantasy season. In PPR leagues, Witten is virtually matchup-proof
in part because Romo leans on him so heavily and because defenses
will gladly give him his 5-8 yard receptions as opposed to watching
Bryant and Austin beat them downfield. Murray is a physical back
whose body has betrayed him through two NFL seasons. Although
he has been “injury-plagued”, he is not “injury-prone”
(in terms of dealing with a chronic injury) in the same way a
back like Darren McFadden is, which makes him more unlucky than
cursed. If his body holds up in 2013, Murray’s slate is
advantageous to a breakout season – not only does Dallas
plan on running more of its offense through him, but also because
of the absence of potentially elite run defenses. Murray’s
abilities as a receiver will keep him viable in fantasy during
any shootout or blowout, so the only question will be if he can
break the 200-carry mark for the first time in his NFL career.
New York Giants |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DAL |
DEN |
CAR |
KC |
PHI |
CHI |
MIN |
PHI |
bye |
OAK |
GB |
DAL |
WAS |
SD |
SEA |
DET |
QB |
Eli Manning |
32 |
20.5 |
20.5 |
308.1 |
308.1 |
3965 |
|
230 |
270 |
240 |
305 |
200 |
235 |
320 |
305 |
|
240 |
260 |
280 |
325 |
265 |
190 |
300 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
5 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
10 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
David Wilson |
22 |
13.8 |
12.3 |
193.5 |
171.5 |
1030 |
|
80 |
50 |
90 |
85 |
110 |
75 |
45 |
75 |
|
125 |
35 |
INJ |
60 |
85 |
45 |
70 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
205 |
|
10 |
0 |
15 |
15 |
0 |
20 |
50 |
10 |
|
15 |
0 |
INJ |
30 |
15 |
5 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
INJ |
4 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Andre Brown |
26 |
12 |
10.7 |
168 |
150 |
620 |
|
50 |
30 |
25 |
45 |
20 |
45 |
55 |
35 |
|
45 |
70 |
90 |
INJ |
25 |
35 |
50 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
INJ |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
15 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
15 |
|
0 |
10 |
15 |
INJ |
10 |
10 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
0 |
2 |
3 |
INJ |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Hakeem Nicks |
25 |
15.7 |
10.5 |
203.5 |
136.5 |
945 |
|
50 |
80 |
105 |
60 |
80 |
INJ |
30 |
INJ |
|
55 |
105 |
65 |
125 |
105 |
40 |
45 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
INJ |
0 |
INJ |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
4 |
6 |
8 |
4 |
6 |
INJ |
2 |
INJ |
|
5 |
8 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Victor Cruz |
26 |
17.3 |
11.1 |
259 |
166 |
1180 |
|
70 |
80 |
80 |
115 |
65 |
85 |
125 |
75 |
|
45 |
90 |
50 |
85 |
70 |
35 |
110 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
5 |
7 |
5 |
8 |
4 |
7 |
11 |
6 |
|
3 |
7 |
5 |
8 |
7 |
2 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Rueben Randle |
22 |
9.3 |
6.1 |
139 |
91 |
610 |
|
35 |
35 |
15 |
55 |
20 |
35 |
75 |
90 |
|
45 |
20 |
40 |
20 |
35 |
40 |
50 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
3 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
|
3 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Ramses Barden |
27 |
1.4 |
0.7 |
20.5 |
10.5 |
105 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
20 |
|
10 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Brandon Myers |
27 |
7.5 |
4.5 |
112 |
68 |
500 |
|
40 |
40 |
25 |
25 |
35 |
30 |
30 |
50 |
|
30 |
25 |
45 |
55 |
20 |
10 |
40 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
3 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
|
3 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Adrien Robinson |
24 |
3.5 |
2.4 |
53 |
36 |
180 |
|
0 |
10 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
30 |
|
15 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
35 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
|
General overview: One of the more intriguing storylines in 2013
– on the field as well as in fantasy – will be how much
the Giants choose to expand Wilson’s role. In terms of pure
explosiveness, the second-year back is the NFC’s answer to
Chris Johnson. But contrary to popular belief, he has a big hill
to climb in order to receive the same number of carries that Johnson
does on a yearly basis. First and foremost, the Giants have featured
a committee attack for years and will almost certainly give Brown
the goal-line work. Secondly, while it could be argued that Wilson’s
upside is higher than Ahmad Bradshaw’s ever was, Brown is
a better back than Brandon Jacobs was for most of his Giants’
career. Last but not least, Wilson isn’t a complete back…yet.
At receiver, New York could be in the process of passing the torch
from Nicks to Randle. That is not to suggest that Nicks won’t
start and/or perform well when he is in the lineup, but if Randle
can carry over his performance in the offseason to the regular season,
the Giants may stick with Randle and decide to let Nicks sign a
huge free-agent deal with another team next offseason. A similar
transition could be taking place at tight end, where the team is
likely hoping that Robinson improves to the point that he can make
Myers expendable and give New York the same kind of production Martellus
Bennett did early last season.
Matchup analysis: The Giants will be tested over the first month
of the season with three road games and three opponents (Dallas,
Denver and Kansas City) capable of making Manning & Co. work
for their yards. Chicago and Minnesota round out a fairly difficult
first-half schedule, but only Dallas and Seattle stick out as
opponents that could stymie Nicks and/or Randle after the bye.
(Cruz is excluded simply because he is nearly unguardable in the
slot, so it will take a special effort to shut him down.) The
running game should have an easier time of it in the first half
as the Cowboys, Panthers, Chiefs and Eagles (twice) are all undersized,
young up front or both. In fact, the only matchups that should
concern fantasy owners at this point would be against Denver (improved
defense plus the likelihood the game will turn into a shootout),
Minnesota and Seattle. Owners also need to recognize that in addition
to injuries and game situations, much will depend on whether we
see the 2011 or 2012 version of Manning. The Giants have the talent
to be an elite offense this year with top-level playmaking ability
at almost every position, but a repeat of Manning’s rollercoaster
2012 campaign could sabotage it in a hurry.
Philadelphia Eagles |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WAS |
SD |
KC |
DEN |
NYG |
TB |
DAL |
NYG |
OAK |
GB |
WAS |
bye |
ARI |
DET |
MIN |
CHI |
QB |
Nick Foles |
24 |
16.9 |
16.9 |
237 |
237 |
3400 |
|
245 |
285 |
280 |
150 |
260 |
85 |
INJ |
320 |
160 |
260 |
255 |
|
235 |
305 |
265 |
295 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
INJ |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
INJ |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
10 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
15 |
0 |
INJ |
5 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
|
0 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QB |
Michael Vick |
33 |
14.4 |
14.4 |
43.3 |
43.3 |
395 |
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
140 |
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
20 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
LeSean McCoy |
25 |
18 |
14.5 |
270.5 |
217.5 |
1060 |
|
85 |
110 |
65 |
40 |
90 |
35 |
110 |
45 |
80 |
55 |
65 |
|
60 |
105 |
35 |
80 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
455 |
|
25 |
15 |
35 |
75 |
15 |
25 |
15 |
35 |
25 |
30 |
35 |
|
15 |
35 |
25 |
50 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
2 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
2 |
5 |
3 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Bryce Brown |
22 |
10.5 |
9.2 |
157.5 |
137.5 |
860 |
|
65 |
35 |
90 |
30 |
55 |
55 |
110 |
35 |
125 |
25 |
40 |
|
85 |
40 |
35 |
35 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
10 |
25 |
0 |
10 |
15 |
20 |
10 |
15 |
0 |
10 |
15 |
|
10 |
5 |
10 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Jeremy Maclin |
25 |
11.3 |
7.5 |
157.5 |
104.5 |
745 |
|
45 |
35 |
40 |
25 |
65 |
80 |
20 |
55 |
INJ |
65 |
50 |
|
85 |
40 |
75 |
65 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
3 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
INJ |
5 |
3 |
|
6 |
2 |
6 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
DeSean Jackson |
26 |
10.4 |
7.5 |
156 |
112 |
820 |
|
85 |
80 |
50 |
20 |
70 |
10 |
35 |
75 |
65 |
50 |
40 |
|
35 |
110 |
55 |
40 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
4 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
|
2 |
6 |
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Jason Avant |
30 |
4.2 |
2.4 |
55 |
31 |
250 |
|
10 |
20 |
0 |
30 |
10 |
15 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
35 |
55 |
|
40 |
20 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
1 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
|
4 |
2 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Arrelious Benn |
24 |
6.7 |
4.1 |
80.5 |
49.5 |
375 |
|
25 |
45 |
65 |
20 |
25 |
30 |
0 |
30 |
25 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
INJ |
35 |
20 |
55 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
INJ |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
2 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
INJ |
3 |
2 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Brent Celek |
28 |
3.2 |
2 |
48 |
30 |
180 |
|
0 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
20 |
15 |
30 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
25 |
|
0 |
10 |
20 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
James Casey |
28 |
7.4 |
4.6 |
104 |
64 |
520 |
|
45 |
35 |
65 |
25 |
40 |
25 |
10 |
50 |
15 |
50 |
35 |
|
35 |
INJ |
50 |
40 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
3 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
|
3 |
INJ |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Zach Ertz |
22 |
4.4 |
2.7 |
57.5 |
35.5 |
295 |
|
0 |
20 |
25 |
35 |
0 |
5 |
35 |
45 |
30 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
15 |
50 |
10 |
25 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
1 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
|
General overview: Given their uncertainty at quarterback and the
offense being installed by new HC Chip Kelly and OC Pat Shurmur,
the Eagles are the NFC East’s version of the Jets –
only with a lot more talent. It is my belief that like his final
years at the University of Oregon, Kelly’s offense will operate
at a breakneck pace. In turn, Philadelphia will find itself in a
number of high-scoring games in part because it is has the personnel
to execute Kelly’s offense and in part because the defense
lacks the overall depth and talent to make it stand up – particularly
against the pass. The Eagles should be the rare team that gives
both of its top two backs enough touches to make them both weekly
starting options in fantasy. Although I think Vick is the better
fit for Kelly’s offense, I decided to name Foles the starter
for this round of projections primarily because he figures to do
a better job of taking care of the football and is a more accurate
passer. Jackson and Maclin should both remain fantasy WR3 options
– albeit inconsistent ones – although both should have
some opportunity to supplement their numbers a bit should Kelly
decided to use them on running plays out of the shotgun formation,
such as fly sweeps. The biggest change, however, might come at tight
end where Celek has been an anchor for several years. In Kelly’s
offense, it is highly likely he will be used mostly as a blocker
while Casey and Ertz attempt to make some noise down the field in
the seams of the defense.
Matchup analysis: Kelly’s insistence to let the quarterback
battle play out well into camp will make the projections for all
of the Eagles’ players very fluid. Foles, Vick and Matt
Barkley each require a different kind of offense in order to succeed,
which obviously makes projecting the Eagles now an exercise in
futility. What we do know is that Philadelphia will face a lot
of defenses early with excellent edge pass rushers. Assuming LT
Jason Peters can make it all the way back from two Achilles’
tendon tears, the Eagles will have the athleticism to handle them
after their selection of Lane Johnson in the draft. The passing
game figures to get tested against Denver, Tampa Bay and Dallas
before the break and Minnesota and Chicago after it, making the
quarterback, Maclin and Jackson poor bets in the fantasy playoffs.
Kelly will likely waste little time leaving his mark on the NFL
and his running game will have an opportunity to do just that
early on. Washington’s run-heavy offense might limit its
touches, Denver’s explosive offense could force the offense
into comeback mode early on and Tampa Bay’s defense could
be good enough to stop the rushing attack regardless, but the
Eagles have a run-friendly schedule for the most part before the
bye. As of this moment, it is my opinion that defenses will have
a very hard time adjusting to Kelly’s approach and that
it will be teams like Washington and Minnesota – offenses
that run the ball particularly well in order to give their defenses
a breather – that will do the best job of limiting the number
of possessions Philadelphia can manage and the number of plays
it can run.
Washington Redskins |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PHI |
GB |
DET |
OAK |
bye |
DAL |
CHI |
DEN |
SD |
MIN |
PHI |
SF |
NYG |
KC |
ATL |
DAL |
QB |
Robert Griffin III |
23 |
23.6 |
23.6 |
329.9 |
329.9 |
3335 |
|
265 |
255 |
305 |
170 |
|
250 |
175 |
195 |
INJ |
260 |
200 |
215 |
285 |
160 |
330 |
270 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
INJ |
1 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
INJ |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
505 |
|
30 |
40 |
55 |
25 |
|
40 |
60 |
25 |
INJ |
55 |
25 |
15 |
55 |
20 |
35 |
25 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
INJ |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QB |
Kirk Cousins |
25 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
22.5 |
22.5 |
400 |
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
70 |
265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Alfred Morris |
24 |
16.4 |
15.5 |
246 |
233 |
1400 |
|
105 |
85 |
90 |
120 |
|
115 |
70 |
90 |
125 |
65 |
45 |
75 |
105 |
120 |
80 |
110 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
5 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
|
0 |
10 |
5 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
5 |
10 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Chris Thompson |
22 |
4.5 |
2.6 |
67 |
39 |
190 |
|
15 |
0 |
10 |
25 |
|
5 |
20 |
10 |
10 |
5 |
35 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
15 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
5 |
15 |
15 |
0 |
|
10 |
5 |
35 |
5 |
15 |
25 |
15 |
0 |
10 |
45 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
1 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
|
1 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Pierre Garcon |
27 |
15.8 |
10.9 |
205 |
142 |
1000 |
|
85 |
70 |
115 |
80 |
|
65 |
55 |
30 |
70 |
INJ |
INJ |
70 |
110 |
90 |
125 |
35 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
5 |
4 |
7 |
6 |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
INJ |
INJ |
6 |
5 |
4 |
8 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Santana Moss |
34 |
6.8 |
4.1 |
102.5 |
61.5 |
555 |
|
40 |
55 |
40 |
25 |
|
20 |
45 |
55 |
55 |
80 |
25 |
20 |
10 |
15 |
35 |
35 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
3 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Leonard Hankerson |
24 |
7.8 |
4.9 |
109 |
68 |
500 |
|
30 |
45 |
70 |
20 |
|
50 |
15 |
0 |
30 |
65 |
INJ |
35 |
25 |
20 |
45 |
50 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
2 |
4 |
6 |
2 |
|
5 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
INJ |
3 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Josh Morgan |
28 |
3.6 |
2 |
54.5 |
30.5 |
245 |
|
20 |
0 |
15 |
10 |
|
10 |
0 |
25 |
40 |
30 |
40 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
5 |
35 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Devery Henderson |
31 |
5.6 |
4.3 |
84 |
65 |
410 |
|
55 |
0 |
15 |
35 |
|
75 |
10 |
30 |
0 |
15 |
60 |
0 |
45 |
10 |
45 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
2 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Fred Davis |
27 |
8.6 |
5.5 |
129.5 |
82.5 |
585 |
|
25 |
70 |
25 |
50 |
|
20 |
35 |
75 |
45 |
40 |
20 |
55 |
30 |
10 |
20 |
65 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
2 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Jordan Reed |
23 |
2.6 |
1.8 |
39 |
27 |
150 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
|
0 |
0 |
10 |
20 |
0 |
30 |
15 |
40 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
General overview: The Redskins claimed their first NFC East title
in ages and return many of their key fantasy players, but despite
all the positive reports to this point, the health of Griffin will
be a question mark until he is able to play multiple games without
incident at the same level he played at in 2012. RG3’s recovery
isn’t the only one of note either; Garcon elected not to have
surgery on the foot injury that limited him for a large part of
last season. With the ex-Colt on the field, Washington has a passing
game. Without him, they are in trouble in that area. Davis enjoyed
a nice three-week run following Garcon’s injury before suffering
his own injury, but he’s really more of a second read in a
passing game that is designed for RG3 to make one read and improvise.
It’s hard to imagine he’ll emerge as a bigger threat
this season following an Achilles’ injury and the Redskins’
selection of Reed in April’s draft. Ironically, the one spot
on this Mike Shanahan-coached team that doesn’t appear to
have any mystery surrounding it is at the starting tailback spot.
Despite adding very little in the passing game, Morris left little
doubt he was the best runner of the group, making the identity of
his third-down complement (and important fantasy handcuff) the biggest
question in Washington’s running game. Since Shanahan loves
to play games at running back, don’t expect an answer for
at least another month.
Matchup analysis: Washington couldn’t have asked for a
much more forgiving schedule against the run before the bye, although
Green Bay and Detroit should be at least a little better stopping
it than they were last season. Still, Morris has a legitimate
shot to be fantasy’s top back heading into the break. The
Redskins face a stiffer challenge after the bye with road games
in Denver and Minnesota as well as a home game with San Francisco,
but Morris should be primed for another incredible fantasy season
if he is able to withstand the same kind of workload he enjoyed
in 2012. Griffin and Garcon should also enjoy the pre-bye slate,
but Garcon could be in for a tough run right after the break if
he isn’t 100%. In successive weeks, he will see plenty of
Morris Claiborne/Brandon Carr, Tim Jennings/Charles Tilllman and
Champ Bailey/Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie. In two of the next three
weeks, he’ll draw what should be the improved pass defenses
of Minnesota and San Francisco. Griffin will remain a viable play
during this stretch because of his ability as a runner, but Washington
doesn’t have enough offensive weapons in the passing game
for RG3 to thrive every week. Despite facing the Niners in Week
12, four of the Redskins’ final five games during the fantasy
season are at home, which should only help an offense that has
reason to believe it will finish strong. The defensive back play
– be it at cornerback, safety or both – for each of
Washington’s three opponents during the fantasy playoffs
is questionable at best.
Suggestions, comments, about the article or
fantasy football in general? E-mail
me or follow me on Twitter.
Doug Orth has written for FF Today
since 2006 and appeared in USA Today’s Fantasy Football Preview
magazine in 2010 and 2011. He hosted USA Today’s hour-long,
pre-kickoff fantasy football internet chat every Sunday this past
season. Doug regularly appears as a fantasy football analyst on
Sirius XM’s “Fantasy Drive” and for 106.7 The
Fan (WJFK – Washington, D.C). He is also a member of the Fantasy
Sports Writers Association. |