A d v e r t i s e m e n t
With the first preseason game kicking off this weekend, it is hard
not to get a bit excited about the surprises this season has in
store for us. Preseason injuries often give a talented second-string
player the opportunity he has been waiting for while training camp
competitions at a certain position can help propel a player into
fantasy stardom as the final piece to an offense that just needed
a quarterback or receiver to step up on what was otherwise a talented
starting lineup.
Predicting injuries – not to mention when they will occur
– can be a slippery slope (but one I choose to navigate
for you, my readers) while camp battles often aren’t decided
until weeks or even days before the start of the season. (We all
remember how long the competition between Cam Newton and Jimmy
Clausen raged last season and how that turned out, right?) But
one factor I have long believed owners could exercise some control
over was putting their non-elite players in the best position
possible to produce for their fantasy team. For the reasons I’ve
already mentioned, projecting future performance will always be
more art than science, but that shouldn’t stop us from maximizing
the science part of the equation while allowing ourselves to enjoy
the unpredictability the NFL offers when the “artistry”
takes over on the field.
For those of us in high-stakes leagues, we know consistent success
in this hobby is difficult. By extension, this fact means the
preparation necessary to claim the grand prize or championship
each season consists of more than casually eyeballing a player’s
season totals and assigning him a number. The method I choose
to use – painstakingly predicting each individual matchup
during the fantasy season – takes into account the requisite
factors such as a player’s talent, supporting cast, scheme,
injury history and age in much the same way every other fantasy
owner and/or analyst does. I believe the key difference with my
projection system offers is that I actually account for the likelihood
that a safety like Oakland’s Tyvon Branch will be matched
up primarily with Rob Gronkowski (it’s a matchup Branch
won rather handily last season) or how often the Jets’ Darrelle
Revis matches up against Wes Welker (it doesn’t happen as
often as you’d think).
In short, I am not using a team’s schedule as my only means
to project (and ultimately rank) a player. Forecasting the season
using Preseason Matchup Analysis takes me almost three weeks to
complete and needs to be updated regularly as new information
becomes available throughout the preseason. It is part of a much
bigger picture that starts in early June that doesn’t really
end until I submit my final Big Board in early September. Since
the goal of this hobby is winning the fantasy title, my emphasis
is on securing as many good matchups during the regular season
(and particularly the fantasy playoffs) as possible. While I will
not suggest there is a huge difference between the Broncos and
Chargers’ defenses this season, it is the likely matchups
within the game that often determine how the fantasy-point pie
is distributed. I do know that I’d prefer that my running
back is facing the Panthers and not the Ravens or Steelers during
the most important time of the season. For receivers and quarterbacks,
I’ll take my chances against the Lions’ secondary
and do my best to avoid the Jets. When you get right down to it,
my method is all about increasing your likelihood of success during
the fantasy postseason – a time when there is usually very
little separating each of the remaining playoff teams.
Before digesting my latest round of projections, feel free to
review my thoughts and forecasts for the AFC
and NFC East as well as the AFC
and NFC North. I feel it is important to note that I do not
use this forecasting method to justify taking a very good player
over an elite player. Since the most elite player in just about
every sport is what we like to call “matchup-proof”,
there is often no reason to move them down a draft board in the
first place. The trick is understanding there are few true matchup-proof
players, so winning a league can often come down to which fantasy
team’s non-elite players perform better and that is truly
where I believe using Preseason Matchup Analysis helps the most.
Much like any projection “system”, each year gives
me the opportunity to tweak and hopefully improve the product.
In my never-ending quest to make my PSAs and Big Boards the best
draft preparation guides I can, I have made a few tweaks that
I want to share with you. By now, you should be familiar with
my color-coded family. Here’s a quick explanation of each:
Red – A very difficult matchup.
For lower-level players, a red matchup means they should not be
used in fantasy that week. For a second- or third-tier player, drop
your expectations for them at least one grade that week (i.e. from
WR2 to WR3). For elite players, expect them to perform one level
lower than their usual status (i.e. RB1 performs like a RB2).
Yellow – Keep expectations
fairly low in this matchup. For lower-level players, a yellow
matchup is a borderline start at best. For a second- or third-tier
player, they can probably overcome the matchup if things fall
right. For the elite players, expect slightly better than average
production.
Grey– Basically, this matchup
is one that could go either way. In some cases, I just don’t
feel like I have a good feel yet for this defense. Generally speaking,
these matchups are winnable matchups for all levels of players.
Green – It doesn’t
get much better than this. For non-elite players, the stage is
basically set for said player to exploit the matchup. For the
elite player, this matchup should produce special numbers.
One notable change I made from last year regarding the labeling
of red, yellow or green matchups is acknowledging that while elite
players can sometimes have unfavorable matchups, their all-around
game simply makes them impossible to bench. (To take an obvious
example, sitting Michael Turner or Shonn Greene in a road matchup
vs. a fully healthy Seahawks defense is an understandable move
because Turner and Greene are highly dependent on the running
game in order to be viable in fantasy and Seattle’s run
defense is pretty solid when healthy, particularly at home. On
the other hand, LeSean McCoy cannot be benched against any defense
simply because he is so likely to get his 100 total yards almost
regardless of the competition since he is so versatile.) As a
result, the elite players will have mostly yellow boxes where
the non-elite players would typically have red. As far as the
passing game is concerned, more defenses are talking about using
“shadow” CBs than in recent years. (And just to be
clear, the term “shadow” doesn’t mean that he
is locked onto a team’s top option 100% of the time.) There
are the ”shadow” CBs most of us have become familiar
with – names such as Darrelle Revis, Johnathan Joseph and
Joe Haden – who will warrant a red box by many of the top
receivers they face. Many other cornerbacks – players like
Nnamdi Asomugha and Asante Samuel come immediately to mind –
typically remain on one side of the field, making it difficult
to give an opposing a true red since they may escape either player
by spending most of their time in the slot. In the case of Samuel,
however, he will have an equally effective corner opposite him
in Brent Grimes, making the slot (against the disappointing Dunta
Robinson) the only place of refuge for opposing receivers.
I’ve updated the notes since last week, so please read
over them closely to better understand what you see below in the
tables:
Notes:
- The grey highlight in each team’s schedule reflects
a road game.
- These are my initial projections and therefore subject
to change. In a few cases, the changes will be dramatic. Changes
may come in the form of a different-colored matchup and/or a
player’s “game log”. In some cases, a strong
preseason may warrant the inclusion of one name in a team projection
and the removal of another. I also feel obligated to mention
that players with minimal projections (such as less than 100
yards rushing or receiving) will be excluded from this four-week
series but have been accounted for in my overall projections.
- For all those readers whose eyes gravitate immediately
to the player’s final numbers: they are 15-game
totals because most fantasy seasons have a Week 16
title game.
- The age you see by each player will be that player’s
age as of September 1, 2012.
Key to the table below:
PPR Aver - Points
per game in full-point PPR leagues where all touchdowns are worth
six points.
NPPR Aver - Points per game in non-PPR
leagues where all touchdowns are worth six points.
PPR - Total points scored in PPR
Non-PPR - Total points scored in
non-PPR.
AFC SOUTH
Houston Texans |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MIA |
JAX |
DEN |
TEN |
NYJ |
GB |
BAL |
bye |
BUF |
CHI |
JAX |
DET |
TEN |
NE |
IND |
MIN |
QB |
Matt Schaub |
31 |
18.3 |
18.3 |
275 |
275 |
3800 |
|
240 |
230 |
270 |
245 |
225 |
310 |
240 |
|
275 |
215 |
215 |
335 |
240 |
340 |
180 |
240 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
0 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
|
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Arian Foster |
26 |
23.4 |
19 |
351.5 |
285.5 |
1395 |
|
105 |
80 |
115 |
105 |
90 |
105 |
85 |
|
90 |
75 |
100 |
80 |
75 |
80 |
125 |
85 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
560 |
|
20 |
25 |
45 |
60 |
20 |
50 |
25 |
|
30 |
65 |
30 |
55 |
25 |
70 |
10 |
30 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
3 |
5 |
6 |
4 |
3 |
7 |
4 |
|
4 |
7 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Ben Tate |
24 |
7.5 |
6.9 |
112.5 |
103.5 |
675 |
|
40 |
30 |
70 |
70 |
25 |
40 |
25 |
|
30 |
40 |
55 |
35 |
40 |
45 |
55 |
75 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
5 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
10 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
James Casey |
27 |
2.6 |
1.8 |
38.5 |
27.5 |
20 |
|
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
0 |
0 |
65 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
|
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
40 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Andre Johnson |
31 |
18.1 |
12.2 |
235.5 |
158.5 |
1105 |
|
85 |
100 |
55 |
105 |
40 |
115 |
75 |
|
105 |
INJ |
INJ |
125 |
80 |
100 |
65 |
55 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
5 |
8 |
4 |
7 |
3 |
9 |
6 |
|
6 |
INJ |
INJ |
10 |
5 |
7 |
4 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Kevin Walter |
31 |
6.4 |
3.8 |
95.5 |
56.5 |
445 |
|
40 |
25 |
35 |
25 |
20 |
40 |
30 |
|
40 |
30 |
35 |
40 |
20 |
10 |
30 |
25 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
3 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
|
3 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Lestar Jean |
24 |
7.5 |
5.1 |
112 |
77 |
530 |
|
30 |
40 |
20 |
0 |
45 |
25 |
35 |
|
20 |
35 |
70 |
40 |
45 |
50 |
25 |
50 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
2 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Owen Daniels |
29 |
9.5 |
5.7 |
142 |
86 |
620 |
|
40 |
40 |
35 |
50 |
65 |
45 |
25 |
|
40 |
50 |
35 |
40 |
30 |
45 |
30 |
50 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
4 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
2 |
|
4 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Garrett Graham |
26 |
2.7 |
1.8 |
41 |
27 |
150 |
|
10 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
15 |
0 |
30 |
|
15 |
15 |
10 |
25 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
General overview: Perhaps no team
currently embodies the old-school mentality of running the ball
and playing good defense like the Texans. Houston running backs
combined for an astounding 510 carries (and 599 touches) last season
totaling 3,367 total yards and 19 touchdowns. (The last team to
exceed both carry and touch figures was the 2008 Baltimore Ravens,
who managed 522 carries and 605 total touches. However, they were
not nearly as productive in the yardage department with 2,688 yards.)
In today’s NFL where the passing game rules, the Texans were
just one of three teams to run the ball more than it passed in 2011.
Despite the loss of the starting right side of their offensive line,
the Texans have very little reason to change their run-heavy approach
since they believe they have players in-house capable of helping
the team pick right back up where it left off in 2011. It could
be argued that two of their three best offensive weapons –
Arian Foster and Ben Tate – are running backs. The emphasis
on the rushing attack was already well in motion before Andre Johnson’s
injury woes last season; however, it probably helps the franchise
to know it can win games during the regular season without the best
player in franchise history, much less claim a division title and
make a Super Bowl run with him less than 100%. They also made this
same push without QB Matt Schaub, who pretty much took what fantasy
value this passing game had away when he was lost for the season
in Week 10 with a Lisfranc injury. Schaub averaged 248 yards and
1.5 passing touchdowns per game through 10 games; rookie T.J. Yates
managed 175 yards and 0.5 scores over his five starts.
Matchup analysis: Considering the
talent level of the players in question and their fit within the
offensive scheme, the matchups for Foster and Tate are about as
appealing as they come. Only Jacksonville (Weeks 2 and 11) and Baltimore
(Week 7) strike any real fear in me if I own one of the Texans’
running backs. If Foster can get help your team to a winning record
through 11 weeks, he should be an absolute beast during the fantasy
playoffs, assuming the Texans don’t have the luxury of resting
him due to a huge lead in the division standings. Tate, as was the
case on occasion last season, will be useful as a flex in games
against the weaker run defenses and/or in potential blowouts. As
luck would have it, Weeks 15 and 16 could easily end up being the
latter with home games vs. the Colts and Vikings. On a run-heavy
offensive team like the Texans, the passing game can be hit or miss.
The good news for key players like Schaub and Johnson is that a
few of the teams on Houston’s schedule this year may be able
to get Houston in a bit of a shootout, which Schaub has thrived
in over the years as a Texan. Such games include the Broncos, Titans
and Packers before the bye and the Bills, Bears, Lions, Titans and
Patriots after it. While many of the matchups are yellow for Schaub
due to a lack of notable weapons at receiver, Johnson has the edge
in just about every matchup he will see this season outside of a
likely showdown against Champ Bailey in Week 3 and a date with shadow
corner Darrelle Revis in Week 5. Although Owen Daniels doesn’t
exactly deserve to be lumped in with the Texans’ “other”
receivers, there were points during last season in which Daniels
was nearly as much of an afterthought as Walter or Jacoby Jones
(now with the Ravens). Despite the fact that his play hasn’t
really dropped off over the past few years, Daniels is now a high-end
TE2 option in this run-based attack.
Indianapolis Colts |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHI |
MIN |
JAX |
bye |
GB |
NYJ |
CLE |
TEN |
MIA |
JAX |
NE |
BUF |
DET |
TEN |
HOU |
KC |
QB |
Andrew Luck |
22 |
18.2 |
18.2 |
273.7 |
273.7 |
3805 |
|
245 |
270 |
285 |
|
290 |
215 |
175 |
295 |
205 |
180 |
300 |
270 |
345 |
325 |
195 |
210 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
0 |
2 |
2 |
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
155 |
|
15 |
5 |
10 |
|
10 |
5 |
5 |
25 |
15 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
15 |
10 |
15 |
10 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Donald Brown |
25 |
7.8 |
6.6 |
93 |
79 |
520 |
|
40 |
55 |
35 |
|
40 |
25 |
90 |
50 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
20 |
65 |
35 |
25 |
40 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
15 |
10 |
5 |
|
10 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
5 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
5 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Vick Ballard |
22 |
8.3 |
7.6 |
125 |
114 |
775 |
|
20 |
40 |
35 |
|
40 |
50 |
70 |
40 |
75 |
50 |
65 |
55 |
60 |
80 |
40 |
55 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
0 |
0 |
10 |
|
5 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
5 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Delone Carter |
25 |
1.6 |
1.4 |
24 |
21 |
130 |
|
15 |
10 |
10 |
|
0 |
15 |
0 |
10 |
20 |
15 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Mewelde Moore |
30 |
5.3 |
2.9 |
73.5 |
40.5 |
135 |
|
10 |
0 |
15 |
|
10 |
10 |
0 |
5 |
20 |
10 |
15 |
10 |
10 |
INJ |
10 |
10 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
|
15 |
10 |
25 |
|
15 |
30 |
5 |
20 |
10 |
0 |
30 |
15 |
10 |
INJ |
10 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
3 |
2 |
3 |
|
2 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
INJ |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Reggie Wayne |
33 |
12.2 |
7.6 |
182.5 |
113.5 |
835 |
|
70 |
45 |
80 |
|
60 |
30 |
25 |
75 |
55 |
60 |
75 |
40 |
100 |
55 |
25 |
40 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
6 |
4 |
5 |
|
5 |
3 |
2 |
7 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
8 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Donnie Avery |
28 |
11.9 |
8.7 |
83 |
61 |
430 |
|
45 |
65 |
30 |
|
20 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
75 |
85 |
110 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
1 |
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
3 |
4 |
3 |
|
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
3 |
4 |
4 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Austin Collie |
26 |
11.1 |
6.7 |
155.5 |
93.5 |
695 |
|
40 |
35 |
50 |
|
65 |
35 |
50 |
70 |
35 |
INJ |
55 |
20 |
65 |
45 |
80 |
50 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
INJ |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
3 |
3 |
5 |
|
6 |
2 |
4 |
7 |
3 |
INJ |
5 |
2 |
6 |
3 |
8 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
LaVon Brazill |
22 |
1.9 |
1.3 |
29 |
19 |
190 |
|
0 |
25 |
0 |
|
15 |
35 |
0 |
20 |
30 |
0 |
25 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
T.Y. Hilton |
22 |
1.9 |
1.1 |
28 |
16 |
160 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
10 |
15 |
25 |
0 |
0 |
55 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
25 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Coby Fleener |
23 |
9.2 |
5.9 |
138 |
89 |
650 |
|
30 |
45 |
65 |
|
50 |
35 |
45 |
60 |
25 |
30 |
70 |
55 |
45 |
70 |
10 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
2 |
4 |
5 |
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Dwayne Allen |
22 |
7.9 |
5.1 |
118 |
76 |
460 |
|
30 |
35 |
20 |
|
40 |
25 |
15 |
30 |
45 |
20 |
45 |
40 |
30 |
15 |
40 |
30 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
3 |
3 |
2 |
|
3 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
|
General overview: As close as the Texans feel like they are to the
Super Bowl, the Colts are just about as far away. Indianapolis is
in full-rebuilding mode, but at least the new front office had the
good sense to surround Peyton Manning’s successor with as
many weapons as possible from the draft after dismissing several
of the team’s staples (Manning, Pierre Garcon, Joseph Addai,
Jeff Saturday – to name a few). As the old cliché goes,
young quarterbacks love their tight ends, so the Colts took Andrew
Luck’s highly-regarded Stanford teammate in Coby Fleener one
round after drafting the top quarterback prospect in years and added
the draft’s best all-around tight end one round later in Clemson’s
Dwayne Allen. In later rounds, Indianapolis added slot extraordinaire/return
specialist T.Y. Hilton and a player they hope will soon replace
Garcon is Ohio speedster LaVon Brazill. However, the most interesting
move may have been the one Reggie Wayne made, when he decided to
remain a Colt – a move that ensures Luck will have the “luxury”
of leaning on a proven veteran as he acclimates himself to the league.
What he does not figure to have, though, is a proven running back
to carry the load for an offense that new HC Chuck Pagano wants
to be a physical, smash-mouth unit. Donald Brown came on down the
stretch last season, but rookie Vick Ballard strikes me as the type
of player that will emerge as the lead back of this committee before
the end of the season.
Matchup analysis: Take a minute to compare Houston’s matchups
vs. Indianapolis’ – this is perhaps one of the best
examples of the contrast that can occur when grading matchups
during the preseason. A veteran quarterback with a strong running
game and proven in-his-prime playmaker vs. a rookie quarterback
with very little running game and a cast of mostly young receivers
playing essentially the same schedule (11 common opponents during
the fantasy season). As you can tell, the Colts’ slate looks
dreadful while the Texans’ looks more than manageable. Starting
with Luck and the passing game, they might get a break in Week
2 against Minnesota, but the rest of the first half schedule appears
to be quite treacherous. The Bears and Packers should have more
than enough pass rush to make Luck uncomfortable, while Wayne
will get to face off against Revis and Joe Haden in consecutive
weeks. Things lighten up a bit during the first part of the second
half of the schedule, but Weeks 12-16 once again figure to overwhelm
this offense. Luck owners cannot expect to count on him late in
the season as he will play road games against Houston (Week 15)
and Kansas City (Week 16) – two defenses that have cornerbacks
to shut down Wayne and defenses that figure to be much too talented
for the Colts to solve. The running game has similar problems
with only one green matchup on the board. Once again, I have the
second half of the schedule lightening up for Indianapolis, but
how many of the neutral games will actually be competitive? In
other words, can we really expect this Colts team to stay in the
game long enough against the high-powered offenses of the Titans
(twice), Patriots and Lions (both of which are on the road)? Luck
will set the stage this season for a potentially dynamic 2013
and beyond, but it may be too much to ask any player from this
offense (outside of Wayne and maybe Austin Collie as potential
WR3s) to be a regular fantasy starter.
Jacksonville Jaguars |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MIN |
HOU |
IND |
CIN |
CHI |
bye |
OAK |
GB |
DET |
IND |
HOU |
TEN |
BUF |
NYJ |
MIA |
NE |
QB |
Blaine
Gabbert |
22 |
15.1 |
15.1 |
150.6 |
150.6 |
2315 |
|
215 |
185 |
255 |
230 |
210 |
|
245 |
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
255 |
370 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
2 |
2 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
10 |
10 |
5 |
5 |
10 |
|
10 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
5 |
10 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QB |
Chad
Henne |
27 |
16.4 |
16.4 |
98.1 |
98.1 |
1240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
310 |
200 |
190 |
235 |
240 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
15 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Maurice
Jones-Drew |
27 |
17.2 |
14.6 |
258.5 |
219.5 |
1250 |
|
85 |
65 |
100 |
75 |
65 |
|
85 |
75 |
100 |
80 |
60 |
110 |
70 |
85 |
115 |
80 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
285 |
|
15 |
35 |
15 |
10 |
15 |
|
15 |
30 |
40 |
10 |
5 |
25 |
10 |
15 |
20 |
25 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
1 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
3 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Rashad
Jennings |
27 |
7.5 |
6.2 |
97 |
81 |
515 |
|
25 |
30 |
45 |
40 |
30 |
|
65 |
40 |
50 |
90 |
25 |
30 |
INJ |
INJ |
30 |
15 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
5 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
5 |
|
5 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
INJ |
INJ |
15 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
INJ |
INJ |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Laurent
Robinson |
27 |
11.6 |
7.8 |
151 |
101 |
710 |
|
45 |
25 |
75 |
55 |
40 |
|
65 |
50 |
90 |
55 |
30 |
INJ |
INJ |
30 |
70 |
80 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
3 |
2 |
6 |
4 |
3 |
|
5 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
INJ |
INJ |
3 |
4 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Justin
Blackmon |
22 |
10.7 |
7.2 |
161 |
108 |
780 |
|
50 |
30 |
55 |
70 |
45 |
|
45 |
65 |
70 |
30 |
40 |
65 |
60 |
10 |
40 |
105 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
4 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
|
3 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Mike
Thomas |
25 |
8.9 |
5.1 |
133.5 |
76.5 |
645 |
|
40 |
40 |
35 |
20 |
55 |
|
35 |
30 |
60 |
25 |
70 |
55 |
45 |
40 |
45 |
50 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
4 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
|
4 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Lee
Evans |
31 |
3.7 |
2.4 |
55.5 |
36.5 |
305 |
|
15 |
0 |
35 |
0 |
10 |
|
25 |
0 |
15 |
30 |
0 |
40 |
45 |
20 |
30 |
40 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Marcedes
Lewis |
28 |
8.5 |
5.4 |
128 |
81 |
570 |
|
35 |
20 |
40 |
45 |
35 |
|
55 |
40 |
20 |
35 |
15 |
40 |
60 |
45 |
35 |
50 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
3 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
|
3 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Zach
Miller |
27 |
2.2 |
1.2 |
21.5 |
11.5 |
115 |
|
10 |
25 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
|
0 |
20 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
General overview: There’s no way around it: last year, there
was Maurice Jones-Drew…and then the sound of crickets (or
passes hitting the ground, take your pick). This offense was abysmal
last year and it really shouldn’t have come as a big surprise
when the Jaguars decided to roll with Mike Thomas and Jason Hill
as their starting receivers, and that was before Jacksonville surprised
many of us by releasing David Garrard and promoting Luke McCown.
That, of course, did not end well, prompting then-HC Jack Del Rio
to perform the face-saving move of rushing rookie Blaine Gabbert
into the lineup. The book on Gabbert was that he may need some time
to develop and the book did not disappoint in that regard as he
finished with the worst passer rating of any regular starter at
quarterback in 2011. (On the plus side, his 65.4 QB rating as a
rookie was better than those of Hall of Famers Bob Griese, Troy
Aikman and Sammy Baugh in their rookie seasons, so there is hope.)
However, the Jags attacked this offseason signing the talented yet
injury-prone receiver Laurent Robinson and trading up two spots
in the draft to secure Justin Blackmon as new HC Mike Mularkey attempts
to install his ball-control, big-play passing scheme in Jacksonville.
Thomas moves back to where he should be – in the slot –
while Marcedes Lewis stands to benefit from all the attention that
his new receivers will attract outside the hashmarks. Believe it
or not, there is fantasy upside here with Gabbert because he will
have NFL-caliber weapons to throw to in 2012, but the question is
whether or not he’ll improve at a pace acceptable enough to
hold off Chad Henne. Mularkey’s teams have run the ball pretty
well everywhere he has coached or called plays, so MJD owners shouldn’t
expect much – if any – drop-off based on the coaching
change. If his production does fall off, it will likely be because
of backup Rashad Jennings nipping at his heels, much like he did
in 2010.
Matchup analysis: All bets are off until MJD reports to camp,
but we’ll proceed as if he’ll return in the next week
or two. And judging by the relative lack of red on the schedule,
it should be one this running game can handle – especially
during the middle part of the season. Because the Jags’
defense should be pretty solid and Mularkey loves running the
ball, there should be more than enough opportunity for both Jones-Drew
and Jennings to be relevant in fantasy (like a poor man’s
Foster and Tate in Houston). I certainly wouldn’t expect
another rushing title for MJD, but a fourth consecutive 1,300-yard
season should be achievable. The outlook is not nearly as bright
for the passing game, which will obviously be affected by how
much better Gabbert is in his second season. Assuming he makes
the improvement I think he can make (but not the one I’m
projecting obviously), Gabbert has a chance to be usable during
the middle part of the season. I highly doubt owners will want
to consider him – even if he is significantly better –
before Week 7 or after Week 10, for what it’s worth. Similarly,
I feel pretty confident in projecting both Robinson and Blackmon
– assuming he doesn’t fall hopelessly behind due to
his holdout – to play at low-end WR3 levels because Gabbert’s
readiness level does not yet figure to be on par with the receivers’
talent level. As is the case with Gabbert, owners may get some
useful games from the pair of newcomers during the middle part
of the season. All in all, however, there figures to be a lot
more miss than hit with this passing game when it comes to deciding
whether Blackmon or Robinson should be in fantasy lineups this
season.
Tennessee Titans |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NE |
SD |
DET |
HOU |
MIN |
PIT |
BUF |
IND |
CHI |
MIA |
bye |
JAX |
HOU |
IND |
NYJ |
GB |
QB |
Jake Locker |
24 |
19.2 |
19.2 |
288.2 |
288.2 |
3730 |
|
240 |
275 |
315 |
235 |
330 |
170 |
260 |
240 |
240 |
275 |
|
240 |
215 |
295 |
160 |
240 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
|
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
190 |
|
20 |
15 |
5 |
15 |
5 |
25 |
10 |
0 |
20 |
10 |
|
10 |
10 |
10 |
15 |
20 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Chris Johnson |
26 |
19 |
16 |
284.5 |
240.5 |
1315 |
|
105 |
85 |
120 |
55 |
100 |
40 |
90 |
135 |
65 |
90 |
|
70 |
85 |
110 |
75 |
90 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
370 |
|
15 |
20 |
15 |
40 |
10 |
10 |
50 |
15 |
35 |
15 |
|
15 |
20 |
15 |
30 |
65 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
2 |
3 |
2 |
6 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
6 |
2 |
|
2 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Javon Ringer |
25 |
4 |
2.8 |
59.5 |
42.5 |
190 |
|
10 |
15 |
5 |
20 |
10 |
20 |
5 |
20 |
10 |
20 |
|
15 |
15 |
10 |
5 |
10 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
5 |
0 |
15 |
10 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
5 |
10 |
5 |
|
5 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
25 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Kenny Britt |
23 |
10.8 |
7.3 |
86.5 |
58.5 |
405 |
|
INJ |
INJ |
50 |
40 |
65 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
40 |
60 |
55 |
15 |
80 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
INJ |
INJ |
3 |
3 |
4 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Nate Washington |
29 |
13.4 |
9.3 |
201 |
139 |
970 |
|
90 |
70 |
115 |
15 |
75 |
30 |
50 |
65 |
50 |
80 |
|
70 |
40 |
105 |
45 |
70 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
6 |
5 |
6 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
|
6 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Kendall Wright |
22 |
9.6 |
6.2 |
125 |
80 |
620 |
|
55 |
65 |
55 |
70 |
65 |
30 |
25 |
50 |
20 |
75 |
|
40 |
25 |
45 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
4 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
|
3 |
1 |
3 |
INJ |
INJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Damian Williams |
24 |
5.5 |
3.1 |
82.5 |
46.5 |
405 |
|
10 |
35 |
20 |
15 |
40 |
50 |
70 |
25 |
15 |
35 |
|
20 |
40 |
0 |
20 |
10 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
1 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
|
2 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Lavelle Hawkins |
26 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
4.5 |
2.5 |
25 |
|
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Jared Cook |
25 |
10.9 |
6.9 |
163 |
104 |
740 |
|
65 |
65 |
40 |
30 |
55 |
40 |
50 |
80 |
25 |
65 |
|
45 |
30 |
65 |
30 |
55 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
4 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
2 |
5 |
|
3 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Craig Stevens |
28 |
2.3 |
1.5 |
35 |
23 |
110 |
|
0 |
10 |
5 |
15 |
10 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
|
15 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
General overview: Questions abound on a team that has a chance to
be incredibly explosive. Who’s going to be the quarterback?
When will Kenny Britt ever get things figured out and when will
he ever be healthy enough to capitalize on his incredible talent?
Can Chris Johnson have another pre-2011 season? When will Jared
Cook finally be able to carry over a strong finish from a previous
season with a Pro Bowl-caliber performance the following year? All
of these are legitimate questions and, as a result, make the Titans
a nightmare to project. Because this team will be a vastly different
animal if Jake Locker wins the job, I took the unprecedented step
to project 15 full games with him as the quarterback and did the
same for Matt Hasselbeck. (Because I think the organization is anxious
to see what the future holds for them right now, I think Locker
wins the job and posted the appropriate projections.) Hasselbeck
is certainly a more efficient passer than Locker, but doesn’t
the first-round pick from 2011 give Tennessee a better shot to move
the ball because of his mobility and big arm? And we’ve seen
what the full-time presence of a mobile quarterback can do for his
running back in recent years, all of which makes Johnson an interesting
fantasy player this season. Britt’s injury and off-field woes
may clear the way for Nate Washington, rookie Kendall Wright and
Cook to star in this offense – something each of the two veterans
proved they were capable of doing at times last season. To what
degree they do so this year depends on the quarterback and Britt,
all of which is to say this team projection is very fluid.
Matchup analysis: Fortunately, the Titans’ schedule is
such that it presents four legitimately difficult matchups almost
across the board (Pittsburgh, New York Jets and twice against
Houston), so the quarterback-matchup board will look the same
regardless of the camp competition between Hasselbeck and Locker.
The winner should get off to a fast start in what should be track-meet
games against New England and Detroit and relatively neutral matchups
against San Diego and Minnesota. As a whole, two reds and a yellow
through 10 pre-bye weeks means the quarterback should have a great
deal of success. After the bye, the Titans may want Locker under
center in order to use his running ability because Tennessee has
four pretty difficult opponents to close out the fantasy season.
Of course, the Titans’ offensive plight would be reduced
somewhat if Johnson follows up his strong offseason with a return
to CJ2K form; Johnson was just the most recent example of why
lengthy holdouts do not typically end well. For the average running
back (look at Javon Ringer’s line in the table above), this
schedule may be enough reason for matchup-conscious owners like
myself to worry. But Johnson’s big-play ability along with
his receiving skills makes him a relatively safe play on a weekly
basis, even after last season. Yes, he does have five yellow-colored
matchups to deal with, but a focused Johnson with all the offensive
weapons now surrounding him means he should produce like a RB1
in all but one or two of those games.
NFC SOUTH
Atlanta Falcons |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KC |
DEN |
SD |
CAR |
WAS |
OAK |
bye |
PHI |
DAL |
NO |
ARI |
TB |
NO |
CAR |
NYG |
DET |
QB |
Matt Ryan |
27 |
23.5 |
23.5 |
352.1 |
352.1 |
4340 |
|
230 |
275 |
335 |
250 |
305 |
255 |
|
245 |
285 |
375 |
295 |
275 |
280 |
270 |
315 |
350 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
2 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
2 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
5 |
15 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
|
10 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
10 |
5 |
10 |
5 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Michael Turner |
30 |
11.5 |
10.8 |
172.5 |
161.5 |
995 |
|
60 |
70 |
45 |
100 |
55 |
80 |
|
70 |
50 |
60 |
35 |
85 |
105 |
70 |
40 |
70 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
0 |
10 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
|
10 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
10 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Jacquizz Rodgers |
23 |
8.1 |
5.7 |
121 |
85 |
300 |
|
25 |
20 |
20 |
10 |
40 |
25 |
|
15 |
15 |
40 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
15 |
20 |
10 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
310 |
|
25 |
35 |
25 |
15 |
50 |
15 |
|
0 |
15 |
30 |
5 |
10 |
40 |
10 |
10 |
25 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
3 |
5 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
|
0 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Jason Snelling |
28 |
6.2 |
4.6 |
92.5 |
68.5 |
355 |
|
15 |
25 |
25 |
0 |
20 |
10 |
|
40 |
20 |
35 |
45 |
35 |
10 |
25 |
25 |
25 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
5 |
15 |
0 |
10 |
20 |
5 |
|
15 |
5 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
15 |
5 |
25 |
10 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
1 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
|
3 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Roddy White |
30 |
17.1 |
11.5 |
256.5 |
172.5 |
1185 |
|
50 |
40 |
90 |
80 |
130 |
100 |
|
60 |
55 |
125 |
50 |
65 |
90 |
60 |
70 |
120 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
5 |
4 |
8 |
6 |
9 |
6 |
|
4 |
5 |
10 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Julio Jones |
23 |
17.1 |
12.1 |
239 |
170 |
1100 |
|
70 |
60 |
120 |
50 |
INJ |
55 |
|
45 |
85 |
75 |
115 |
90 |
40 |
125 |
65 |
105 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
INJ |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
5 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
INJ |
3 |
|
3 |
6 |
6 |
5 |
7 |
4 |
7 |
4 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Harry Douglas |
27 |
8.2 |
5.3 |
122.5 |
79.5 |
615 |
|
30 |
45 |
35 |
35 |
50 |
60 |
|
55 |
35 |
75 |
25 |
50 |
40 |
10 |
40 |
30 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
3 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
|
3 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Tony Gonzalez |
36 |
12.2 |
7.6 |
183 |
114 |
780 |
|
40 |
60 |
55 |
40 |
35 |
20 |
|
60 |
55 |
60 |
90 |
30 |
55 |
50 |
80 |
50 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
4 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
|
5 |
4 |
6 |
8 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
7 |
5 |
|
General overview: The plan that GM Thomas Dimitroff set into motion
during the NFL Draft in 2011 is starting to round into form. After
years of leaning on the ground game, the Falcons are opening things
up. Matt Ryan, who did nothing but improve each season in former
OC Mike Mularkey’s conservative offensive attack, should have
every opportunity to launch an all-out aerial assault under new
OC Dirk Koetter. Roddy White and Julio Jones – the apple of
Dimitroff’s eye in the aforementioned draft – combine
to give Ryan one of the most talented 1-2 punches at receiver in
the league. In the rare instance neither receiver is open on a given
play, Tony Gonzalez is still around and is almost a lock for at
least 60-70 catches. And if that weren’t enough, Jones’
draft classmate Jacquizz Rodgers has the ability to take a draw
or screen pass the distance and will be given a chance to do so
much more often in 2012. While the emphasis on the passing game
might serve as a buzzkill to Michael Turner’s owners, 50-75
fewer rushing attempts per season may actually allow him to be an
effective fantasy runner during fantasy playoff time and until his
contract expires following the end of the 2013 season. If Atlanta
follows through with its plan to cater to Ryan’s strengths
as a passer and field general – especially when it comes to
the no-huddle - this offense could be incredible.
Matchup analysis: In all my years of analyzing the matchups during
the preseason, I’m not sure I’ve ever come across
one quite like this – I could not bring myself to label
a single matchup red. Certainly, the Falcons have some potentially
difficult matchups in the passing game, but which receiver is
Denver’s Champ Bailey or Kansas City’s Brandon Flowers
going to guard? And when the “other” receiver burns
his defender enough times, is Bailey or Flowers going to switch
receivers? Unlikely, but I bet the receivers will take turns burning
the other cornerback(s) on the opposite side of the formation.
More than the absence of red, however, is the preponderance of
green, especially at the back end of the schedule. Since I’m
assuming defenses will still consider White the top receiver,
Ryan and Jones should have a field day carving up the Saints (particularly
in the Georgia Dome), Bucs and Lions down the stretch. While White
will likely see his share of Aqib Talib, Patrick Robinson, Chris
Gamble and Chris Houston over the last seven games of the season,
Jones will likely see more of Jabari Greer, Alphonso Smith, Captain
Munnerlyn and Eric Wright. While Greer is no slouch, all four
defenders are poor matchups for someone of Jones’ stature
and playmaking ability. With the offense finally geared towards
the talents in the passing game, it is entirely possible Turner
will be able to finish the season strong for the first time since
2008, the year he joined the team. Of the matchups I marked yellow
for Turner, Rodgers and Snelling, only the Chargers and Cardinals
give me some pause. I hesitated giving Rodgers any yellows due
to the simple fact that he should be used in a capacity similar
to Darren Sproles, but I have my doubts that Atlanta wants to
commit 86 catches and 173 offensive touches to Rodgers like the
Saints did with Sproles a season ago.
Carolina Panthers |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TB |
NO |
NYG |
ATL |
SEA |
bye |
DAL |
CHI |
WAS |
DEN |
TB |
PHI |
KC |
ATL |
SD |
OAK |
QB |
Cam Newton |
23 |
23.4 |
23.4 |
351.4 |
351.4 |
3935 |
|
250 |
305 |
285 |
165 |
225 |
|
320 |
290 |
390 |
235 |
235 |
160 |
215 |
240 |
350 |
270 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
0 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
580 |
|
30 |
25 |
40 |
35 |
35 |
|
35 |
25 |
40 |
60 |
45 |
70 |
20 |
30 |
35 |
55 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
DeAngelo Williams |
29 |
8.2 |
7.5 |
123.5 |
112.5 |
745 |
|
70 |
60 |
35 |
60 |
30 |
|
35 |
30 |
45 |
85 |
70 |
30 |
40 |
25 |
75 |
55 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
5 |
0 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
|
10 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Jonathan Stewart |
25 |
11.4 |
9.4 |
170.5 |
141.5 |
765 |
|
45 |
75 |
50 |
25 |
65 |
|
45 |
50 |
30 |
45 |
50 |
60 |
75 |
35 |
35 |
80 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
230 |
|
15 |
20 |
10 |
5 |
0 |
|
15 |
10 |
45 |
40 |
10 |
25 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
5 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
2 |
1 |
4 |
6 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Mike Tolbert |
26 |
8.4 |
5.4 |
109.5 |
70.5 |
160 |
|
15 |
5 |
15 |
0 |
10 |
|
25 |
10 |
INJ |
INJ |
15 |
10 |
10 |
20 |
15 |
10 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
245 |
|
20 |
15 |
25 |
35 |
10 |
|
10 |
25 |
INJ |
INJ |
15 |
25 |
10 |
20 |
15 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
3 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
|
2 |
4 |
INJ |
INJ |
3 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Steve Smith |
33 |
14.7 |
9.9 |
220 |
148 |
1120 |
|
30 |
105 |
80 |
40 |
75 |
|
90 |
130 |
130 |
40 |
65 |
40 |
50 |
70 |
115 |
60 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
3 |
7 |
6 |
3 |
5 |
|
5 |
7 |
8 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Brandon LaFell |
25 |
8.4 |
5.4 |
125.5 |
81.5 |
575 |
|
50 |
30 |
45 |
15 |
25 |
|
65 |
30 |
25 |
50 |
35 |
0 |
70 |
15 |
65 |
55 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
5 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
|
5 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
David Gettis |
25 |
5.7 |
3.4 |
80 |
48 |
420 |
|
30 |
20 |
35 |
10 |
15 |
|
45 |
20 |
40 |
25 |
INJ |
20 |
35 |
40 |
45 |
40 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
3 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
INJ |
2 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Louis Murphy |
25 |
3.8 |
2.5 |
57.5 |
37.5 |
255 |
|
40 |
25 |
0 |
15 |
35 |
|
10 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
45 |
15 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
40 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
3 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Greg Olsen |
27 |
10.2 |
6.4 |
153.5 |
96.5 |
725 |
|
30 |
55 |
40 |
25 |
65 |
|
60 |
45 |
80 |
50 |
65 |
20 |
40 |
60 |
70 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
2 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
5 |
|
6 |
4 |
6 |
4 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Gary Barnidge |
26 |
4.8 |
3.1 |
62.5 |
40.5 |
285 |
|
30 |
35 |
35 |
10 |
0 |
|
15 |
30 |
40 |
25 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
15 |
20 |
30 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
2 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
1 |
2 |
2 |
|
General overview: From a fantasy perspective, they may not be a
team that is harder to get a read on entering this season than the
Panthers. Cam Newton wasted little time announcing his arrival as
a valuable fantasy property, throwing for over 400 yards in each
of his first two starts as a pro. From that point on, however, he
topped 300 yards just once more time all year as he spearheaded
a rushing attack that finished third in the league. Over the final
14 games of 2011, Carolina rushed for 2,263 yards – an average
of 161.6 yards per game. So are the Panthers a proficient running
team with the ability to pass when they want or a passing team that
runs because of their depth at running back and relative lack of
playmakers at receiver? That question figures to go unanswered into
this season since the offense’s most important addition was
– you guessed it – another running back. Mike Tolbert
isn’t your average running back either, primarily because
he is a goal-line specialist who is an asset as a third-down back
trapped in a fullback’s body. The NFL has seen players like
this before – Larry Centers comes to mind – but it further
muddies a backfield picture that really didn’t need to be
any more complicated than it already was. Even if he spends most
of his time at fullback as the team suggests he will, there’s
a very good chance Tolbert takes over the goal-line role from Newton
and steals a good deal of the flex appeal of Jonathan Stewart and
DeAngelo Williams. When the Panthers do throw the ball this year,
Newton figures to lean on Steve Smith once again after he was on
the receiving end for 34% of Newton’s passing yards and 33%
of his passing touchdowns. Meanwhile, owners of Greg Olsen who believe
they have their sleeper top-five tight end now that Jeremy Shockey
is gone need to understand the team likes what Gary Barnidge can
do as a downfield option; he could very well inherit Shockey’s
37 catches and four touchdowns.
Matchup analysis: Much like some of the elite running backs we’ve
discussed over the last few weeks, Newton can generally be considered
matchup-proof at the moment because he is both a skilled passer
and unbelievable runner. Newton doesn’t have a particularly
difficult schedule even if you eliminated his ability as a runner,
but he could struggle in games against the Giants (Week 3) and
the Falcons (Weeks 4 and 14) because each team has enough athleticism
up front to chase him down and the depth and talent necessary
to shut down their receivers. Nevertheless, Newton should be an
asset in the fantasy playoffs. Smith’s road to fantasy success
is a bit more difficult with multiple matchups against the likes
of Aqib Talib and the duo of Asante Samuel and Brent Grimes as
well as single games against Champ Bailey, Nnamdi Asomugha and
Brandon Flowers. As I state in the introduction, I do understand
that not all of the top cornerbacks are “shadow” corners,
but most of the players I just mentioned in the last sentence
will likely fill that role this season for their defense. While
the passing game is relatively simple from a fantasy point of
view, the running game is an absolute nightmare. Stewart and Williams
finished with relatively similar numbers in carries and rushing
yards, with the former distinguishing himself in the passing game.
Tolbert now figures to get the bulk of that work now, essentially
making all three the same kind of back for fantasy purposes. This
should go a long way in explaining why all three have the exact
same color codes on their schedules. The crowded backfield is
a shame for fantasy purpose since outside of a five-game stretch
from Week 3-8, Carolina has a relatively soft schedule against
the run until the start of the fantasy playoffs. Barring injury,
owners may just need to resign themselves to the idea the Panthers
just won’t provide them with an every-week starter at the
RB position.
New Orleans Saints |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WAS |
CAR |
KC |
GB |
SD |
bye |
TB |
DEN |
PHI |
ATL |
OAK |
SF |
ATL |
NYG |
TB |
DAL |
QB |
Drew Brees |
33 |
27.5 |
27.5 |
412.7 |
412.7 |
4930 |
|
380 |
350 |
345 |
355 |
365 |
|
360 |
305 |
280 |
255 |
365 |
330 |
235 |
315 |
355 |
335 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
3 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
|
3 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
5 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Mark Ingram |
22 |
8.9 |
8.3 |
115.5 |
107.5 |
600 |
|
35 |
55 |
45 |
35 |
40 |
|
80 |
45 |
40 |
20 |
80 |
10 |
INJ |
INJ |
65 |
50 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
1 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
5 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
|
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
5 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Pierre Thomas |
27 |
11.1 |
7.9 |
166 |
118 |
495 |
|
30 |
40 |
50 |
40 |
20 |
|
25 |
35 |
15 |
25 |
15 |
25 |
45 |
75 |
30 |
25 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
385 |
|
25 |
35 |
50 |
30 |
25 |
|
10 |
25 |
40 |
10 |
15 |
50 |
20 |
15 |
10 |
25 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
3 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
|
2 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
6 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Darren Sproles |
29 |
16.5 |
11.1 |
248 |
167 |
500 |
|
40 |
25 |
35 |
15 |
45 |
|
15 |
25 |
45 |
10 |
75 |
10 |
40 |
25 |
55 |
40 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
690 |
|
45 |
35 |
65 |
55 |
40 |
|
55 |
70 |
55 |
20 |
45 |
50 |
15 |
60 |
45 |
35 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
5 |
5 |
8 |
7 |
5 |
|
6 |
5 |
8 |
3 |
5 |
7 |
2 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Marques Colston |
29 |
17.1 |
11.3 |
256.5 |
169.5 |
1155 |
|
85 |
100 |
50 |
75 |
65 |
|
90 |
35 |
55 |
75 |
120 |
45 |
80 |
70 |
130 |
80 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
7 |
7 |
4 |
6 |
5 |
|
7 |
2 |
5 |
6 |
9 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
9 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Lance Moore |
29 |
10.4 |
6.5 |
146 |
91 |
610 |
|
35 |
25 |
55 |
70 |
30 |
|
70 |
55 |
40 |
25 |
35 |
40 |
INJ |
35 |
55 |
40 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
INJ |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
3 |
2 |
5 |
7 |
3 |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
INJ |
3 |
6 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Devery Henderson |
30 |
6.4 |
4.4 |
96.5 |
66.5 |
485 |
|
65 |
30 |
20 |
45 |
50 |
|
20 |
10 |
15 |
5 |
80 |
25 |
25 |
55 |
10 |
30 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
3 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
|
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Nick Toon |
23 |
3 |
1.6 |
45 |
24 |
240 |
|
15 |
25 |
45 |
0 |
0 |
|
25 |
30 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
20 |
35 |
10 |
20 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
|
2 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Jimmy Graham |
25 |
20.1 |
13.5 |
302 |
203 |
1190 |
|
95 |
90 |
45 |
80 |
125 |
|
80 |
70 |
75 |
85 |
55 |
85 |
55 |
70 |
80 |
100 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
7 |
8 |
3 |
6 |
10 |
|
6 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
5 |
7 |
6 |
5 |
7 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
David Thomas |
29 |
2.1 |
1.2 |
32 |
18 |
120 |
|
10 |
0 |
15 |
0 |
20 |
|
10 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
15 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
General overview: Here’s a number for you: 7,474 - the total
number of scrimmage yards the Saints posted last year as they ran
a league-high 1,117 plays and gained an NFL-best 6.7 yards per play.
For those of you worried about the effect that losing HC Sean Payton
for the year due to suspension will have on this offense, consider
that OC Pete Carmichael directed an offensive onslaught that averaged
476.1 yards and 37 points over the final 10 games of the regular
season (slight increases over the 452.1 yards and 29.5 points the
team averaged in the six games before Payton’s sideline knee
injury). So rest easy, New Orleans: barring a multi-week injury
to Drew Brees or Jimmy Graham, your offense isn’t likely to
take the foot off the pedal anytime soon. While it is too much to
ask the Saints for a repeat virtuoso performance, there is really
no reason why they can’t come pretty close. Brees no longer
has a contract to worry about, Graham is just in his fourth year
of organized football and probably has not hit his ceiling as a
player yet and Darren Sproles seemingly does more with 10-12 offensive
touches per game than just about any player I can remember. The
only true loss from a personnel perspective was Robert Meachem,
but the team has long waited for an opportunity to promote Adrian
Arrington and just has not had the opportunity to do so. Rookie
Nick Toon has also reportedly been impressive during the spring
and summer. So, with a defense that should only see marginal improvement
in 2012 in an offensive division, New Orleans may be on the verge
of another 7,000+ yard season.
Matchup analysis: On an offense this wide open and aggressive,
it’s hard to say there is a single red-worthy matchup for
the passing game regardless of the opponent. Graham is nearly
impossible to cover at 6-7 and 265 pounds with an incredible catch
radius that complements his jaw-dropping athleticism. Although
Marques Colston does not have Graham’s freakish athleticism
of Graham or his good track record when it comes to durability,
Colston presents a similar dilemma for defenses since the Saints
love to use him in the slot; not many defenses have slot corners
willing or able to guard a 6-4, 225-pound receiver with sticky
hands; it is the amount of time that he spends in the slot that
helps him avoid any red matchups. Likewise, not many teams have
linebackers or safeties with the ability to tackle Sproles. While
Brees is certainly capable of having an off day from time to time,
it would seem foolish to label any of his matchups as bad ones
due to the fact he possesses three “matchup nightmares”
with 80-100 catch potential. Lance Moore has made his living in
recent years finding holes in zone coverage, so he’s a worthy
play anytime the Saints go against a zone-heavy defense while
Devery Henderson is a wildly inconsistent fantasy property that
should only be targeted when defenses lack good safety play. I
reluctantly gave Mark Ingram three reds against the Falcons and
Niners, but since his role is as the short-yardage and inside
muscle on a team capable of scoring over 30 points a game, it
becomes difficult to say he isn’t capable of converting
a 1-2 yard scoring plunge against any opponent. Compared to Sproles
and Ingram, Pierre Thomas is really the best of both worlds since
he has enough size to be a 10-15 carry-per-game player if necessary
but is enough of an asset in the passing game (50 catches in 2011)
that he is a strong flex option against just about any opponent.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers |
Pos |
Player |
Age |
PPR Aver |
NPPR Aver |
PPR |
Non |
Totals |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAR |
NYG |
DAL |
WAS |
bye |
KC |
NO |
MIN |
OAK |
SD |
CAR |
ATL |
DEN |
PHI |
NO |
STL |
QB |
Josh Freeman |
24 |
20.5 |
20.5 |
307.8 |
307.8 |
3720 |
|
255 |
235 |
245 |
240 |
|
265 |
310 |
225 |
225 |
360 |
150 |
250 |
200 |
190 |
320 |
250 |
|
TD |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
1 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
|
INT |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
|
Ru Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
270 |
|
10 |
25 |
20 |
15 |
|
10 |
20 |
25 |
5 |
40 |
25 |
15 |
15 |
20 |
15 |
10 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Doug Martin |
23 |
15.2 |
12.5 |
227.5 |
187.5 |
1110 |
|
80 |
65 |
50 |
70 |
|
80 |
105 |
65 |
90 |
55 |
115 |
55 |
65 |
70 |
65 |
80 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
285 |
|
20 |
15 |
40 |
10 |
|
15 |
20 |
10 |
5 |
25 |
0 |
15 |
35 |
15 |
45 |
15 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
3 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
|
2 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
LeGarrette Blount |
25 |
7.3 |
7 |
95.5 |
90.5 |
625 |
|
55 |
45 |
70 |
25 |
|
40 |
25 |
70 |
65 |
30 |
INJ |
INJ |
50 |
65 |
30 |
55 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
INJ |
INJ |
10 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
INJ |
INJ |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RB |
Michael Smith |
24 |
3.6 |
2.2 |
54.5 |
32.5 |
150 |
|
20 |
10 |
5 |
10 |
|
15 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
5 |
20 |
15 |
5 |
10 |
15 |
0 |
|
Ru TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re Yards |
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
15 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
|
15 |
20 |
10 |
0 |
30 |
20 |
10 |
0 |
15 |
15 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
|
2 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Vincent Jackson |
29 |
15.1 |
10.6 |
227 |
159 |
1110 |
|
85 |
75 |
70 |
120 |
|
35 |
90 |
45 |
140 |
85 |
40 |
70 |
35 |
55 |
120 |
45 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
4 |
5 |
6 |
8 |
|
3 |
5 |
2 |
7 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
8 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Mike Williams |
25 |
12.7 |
8.3 |
190.5 |
124.5 |
885 |
|
55 |
40 |
70 |
45 |
|
65 |
75 |
55 |
30 |
100 |
50 |
40 |
70 |
35 |
75 |
80 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
5 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
|
4 |
7 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Preston Parker |
25 |
7.1 |
4.1 |
107 |
62 |
500 |
|
40 |
35 |
35 |
20 |
|
55 |
30 |
50 |
10 |
25 |
30 |
40 |
20 |
35 |
20 |
55 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
|
5 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WR |
Arrelious Benn |
23 |
4.9 |
2.8 |
58.5 |
33.5 |
275 |
|
10 |
15 |
0 |
20 |
|
40 |
30 |
25 |
25 |
45 |
0 |
50 |
15 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
INJ |
INJ |
INJ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Luke Stocker |
24 |
1.6 |
1 |
24.5 |
14.5 |
85 |
|
10 |
5 |
15 |
10 |
|
10 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TE |
Dallas Clark |
33 |
4.5 |
2.8 |
67.5 |
41.5 |
295 |
|
20 |
35 |
15 |
0 |
|
30 |
40 |
20 |
15 |
35 |
10 |
25 |
0 |
15 |
15 |
20 |
|
Re TD |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Rec |
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
2 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
|
2 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
General overview: The one team in this division that overhauled
their coach and coordinators, the Bucs could be considered something
of a mystery team this year. On one hand, they are very likely
to be a bruising and physical run-heavy team that has the ability
to go deep at will with Vincent Jackson now on the roster. On
the other hand, the run defense figures to be among the worst
in the league again, which may make it difficult for Tampa Bay
to implement Buc-ball each and every game. Lucky for rookie Doug
Martin, he is equally adept as a runner and receiver, giving him
a substantial advantage over LeGarrette Blount. Jackson’s
arrival means less attention (probably offensively and defensively)
for Mike Williams but gives Josh Freeman a fighting chance to
recapture the form that allowed him to finish as a top-10 fantasy
quarterback in 2010. Don’t be surprised if he makes another
push into that area, now that he has a respected assistant-turned-OC
in Mike Sullivan (formerly Eli Manning’s QB coach) and weapons
like Martin and Jackson. Also, keep in mind that Freeman can run
the ball a bit (he has averaged nearly 20 yards rushing in 41
career games and scored four times in the red zone last season.
Having dropped roughly 20 pounds in the offseason and with an
offensive emphasis on the run now, Freeman figures to bounce back
in a big way as a runner (think a very poor man’s Cam Newton)
and thrower with a respectable deep threat and all-purpose running
back contributing to his cause.
Matchup analysis: One reason I
have a reasonable amount of optimism for this Bucs’ offense
is the division they play in – the NFC South. Only Atlanta
with new DC Mike Nolan and an impressive secondary strikes me
as a defense to avoid and Tampa Bay is fortunate to only meet
the Falcons once during the fantasy season. The back end of Freeman’s
schedule is no cakewalk, but before dismissing him, you should
ask yourself: what is the likelihood is that at least three of
those final four games will not be high-scoring? Jackson needs
Freeman to be on his game in 2012 as the new WR1 has a string
of difficult matchups, especially after the bye. Over the final
11 weeks, V-Jax will square off against likely shadow corners
Brandon Flowers, Chris Cook, Chris Gamble and Cortland Finnegan.
In his other yellow and red games, Jackson will see plenty of
the Falcons (Brent Grimes and Asante Samuel) and Eagles’
CB duos (Nnamdi Asomugha and Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie) as well
as Champ Bailey. Despite his huge contract, Jackson was already
a bad bet to post his first 70-catch season and a review of this
schedule makes that task even more daunting unless he has taken
great strides to develop the short and intermediate parts of his
game this offseason. The tough slate for Jackson bodes well for
Williams, but how interested is he in maximizing his talent? Much
like the case was for Freeman, I’m optimistic Martin has
the skills (and offensive line) necessary to perform at a top-end
RB2 level this season. In fact, Martin should be in line for an
incredible second half of the season if he leaves Blount in his
wake during training camp and doesn’t hit the “rookie
wall” late in the season.
Suggestions, comments,
musings about the article or fantasy football in general? E-mail
me or follow me on Twitter.
Doug Orth has written for FF Today
since 2006, appeared in USA Today’s Fantasy Football Preview
magazine in each of the last two seasons and served as a weekly
fantasy football analyst for 106.7 The Fan (WJFK – Washington,
D.C). He is also a member of the Fantasy Sports Writers Association. |