|  
                With the first preseason game kicking off this weekend, it is hard 
              not to get a bit excited about the surprises this season has in 
              store for us. Preseason injuries often give a talented second-string 
              player the opportunity he has been waiting for while training camp 
              competitions at a certain position can help propel a player into 
              fantasy stardom as the final piece to an offense that just needed 
              a quarterback or receiver to step up on what was otherwise a talented 
              starting lineup.
  
 A d v e r t i s e m e n t Predicting injuries – not to mention when they will occur 
                – can be a slippery slope (but one I choose to navigate 
                for you, my readers) while camp battles often aren’t decided 
                until weeks or even days before the start of the season. (We all 
                remember how long the competition between Cam Newton and Jimmy 
                Clausen raged last season and how that turned out, right?) But 
                one factor I have long believed owners could exercise some control 
                over was putting their non-elite players in the best position 
                possible to produce for their fantasy team. For the reasons I’ve 
                already mentioned, projecting future performance will always be 
                more art than science, but that shouldn’t stop us from maximizing 
                the science part of the equation while allowing ourselves to enjoy 
                the unpredictability the NFL offers when the “artistry” 
                takes over on the field. For those of us in high-stakes leagues, we know consistent success 
                in this hobby is difficult. By extension, this fact means the 
                preparation necessary to claim the grand prize or championship 
                each season consists of more than casually eyeballing a player’s 
                season totals and assigning him a number. The method I choose 
                to use – painstakingly predicting each individual matchup 
                during the fantasy season – takes into account the requisite 
                factors such as a player’s talent, supporting cast, scheme, 
                injury history and age in much the same way every other fantasy 
                owner and/or analyst does. I believe the key difference with my 
                projection system offers is that I actually account for the likelihood 
                that a safety like Oakland’s Tyvon Branch will be matched 
                up primarily with Rob Gronkowski (it’s a matchup Branch 
                won rather handily last season) or how often the Jets’ Darrelle 
                Revis matches up against Wes Welker (it doesn’t happen as 
                often as you’d think).  In short, I am not using a team’s schedule as my only means 
                to project (and ultimately rank) a player. Forecasting the season 
                using Preseason Matchup Analysis takes me almost three weeks to 
                complete and needs to be updated regularly as new information 
                becomes available throughout the preseason. It is part of a much 
                bigger picture that starts in early June that doesn’t really 
                end until I submit my final Big Board in early September. Since 
                the goal of this hobby is winning the fantasy title, my emphasis 
                is on securing as many good matchups during the regular season 
                (and particularly the fantasy playoffs) as possible. While I will 
                not suggest there is a huge difference between the Broncos and 
                Chargers’ defenses this season, it is the likely matchups 
                within the game that often determine how the fantasy-point pie 
                is distributed. I do know that I’d prefer that my running 
                back is facing the Panthers and not the Ravens or Steelers during 
                the most important time of the season. For receivers and quarterbacks, 
                I’ll take my chances against the Lions’ secondary 
                and do my best to avoid the Jets. When you get right down to it, 
                my method is all about increasing your likelihood of success during 
                the fantasy postseason – a time when there is usually very 
                little separating each of the remaining playoff teams. Before digesting my latest round of projections, feel free to 
                review my thoughts and forecasts for the AFC 
                and NFC East as well as the AFC 
                and NFC North. I feel it is important to note that I do not 
                use this forecasting method to justify taking a very good player 
                over an elite player. Since the most elite player in just about 
                every sport is what we like to call “matchup-proof”, 
                there is often no reason to move them down a draft board in the 
                first place. The trick is understanding there are few true matchup-proof 
                players, so winning a league can often come down to which fantasy 
                team’s non-elite players perform better and that is truly 
                where I believe using Preseason Matchup Analysis helps the most. Much like any projection “system”, each year gives 
                me the opportunity to tweak and hopefully improve the product. 
                In my never-ending quest to make my PSAs and Big Boards the best 
                draft preparation guides I can, I have made a few tweaks that 
                I want to share with you. By now, you should be familiar with 
                my color-coded family. Here’s a quick explanation of each:Red – A very difficult matchup. 
              For lower-level players, a red matchup means they should not be 
              used in fantasy that week. For a second- or third-tier player, drop 
              your expectations for them at least one grade that week (i.e. from 
              WR2 to WR3). For elite players, expect them to perform one level 
              lower than their usual status (i.e. RB1 performs like a RB2).
 Yellow – Keep expectations 
                fairly low in this matchup. For lower-level players, a yellow 
                matchup is a borderline start at best. For a second- or third-tier 
                player, they can probably overcome the matchup if things fall 
                right. For the elite players, expect slightly better than average 
                production. Grey– Basically, this matchup 
                is one that could go either way. In some cases, I just don’t 
                feel like I have a good feel yet for this defense. Generally speaking, 
                these matchups are winnable matchups for all levels of players. Green – It doesn’t 
                get much better than this. For non-elite players, the stage is 
                basically set for said player to exploit the matchup. For the 
                elite player, this matchup should produce special numbers.  One notable change I made from last year regarding the labeling 
                of red, yellow or green matchups is acknowledging that while elite 
                players can sometimes have unfavorable matchups, their all-around 
                game simply makes them impossible to bench. (To take an obvious 
                example, sitting Michael Turner or Shonn Greene in a road matchup 
                vs. a fully healthy Seahawks defense is an understandable move 
                because Turner and Greene are highly dependent on the running 
                game in order to be viable in fantasy and Seattle’s run 
                defense is pretty solid when healthy, particularly at home. On 
                the other hand, LeSean McCoy cannot be benched against any defense 
                simply because he is so likely to get his 100 total yards almost 
                regardless of the competition since he is so versatile.) As a 
                result, the elite players will have mostly yellow boxes where 
                the non-elite players would typically have red. As far as the 
                passing game is concerned, more defenses are talking about using 
                “shadow” CBs than in recent years. (And just to be 
                clear, the term “shadow” doesn’t mean that he 
                is locked onto a team’s top option 100% of the time.) There 
                are the ”shadow” CBs most of us have become familiar 
                with – names such as Darrelle Revis, Johnathan Joseph and 
                Joe Haden – who will warrant a red box by many of the top 
                receivers they face. Many other cornerbacks – players like 
                Nnamdi Asomugha and Asante Samuel come immediately to mind – 
                typically remain on one side of the field, making it difficult 
                to give an opposing a true red since they may escape either player 
                by spending most of their time in the slot. In the case of Samuel, 
                however, he will have an equally effective corner opposite him 
                in Brent Grimes, making the slot (against the disappointing Dunta 
                Robinson) the only place of refuge for opposing receivers. I’ve updated the notes since last week, so please read 
                over them closely to better understand what you see below in the 
                tables:  Notes:
 
 
                The grey highlight in each team’s schedule reflects 
                  a road game.
 
These are my initial projections and therefore subject 
                  to change. In a few cases, the changes will be dramatic. Changes 
                  may come in the form of a different-colored matchup and/or a 
                  player’s “game log”. In some cases, a strong 
                  preseason may warrant the inclusion of one name in a team projection 
                  and the removal of another. I also feel obligated to mention 
                  that players with minimal projections (such as less than 100 
                  yards rushing or receiving) will be excluded from this four-week 
                  series but have been accounted for in my overall projections.
 
For all those readers whose eyes gravitate immediately 
                  to the player’s final numbers: they are 15-game 
                  totals because most fantasy seasons have a Week 16 
                  title game.
 
The age you see by each player will be that player’s 
                  age as of September 1, 2012.
 
  Key to the table below: PPR Aver - Points 
                per game in full-point PPR leagues where all touchdowns are worth 
                six points.NPPR Aver - Points per game in non-PPR 
                leagues where all touchdowns are worth six points.
 PPR - Total points scored in PPR
 Non-PPR - Total points scored in 
                non-PPR.
 
 
 AFC SOUTH 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Houston Texans |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | MIA | JAX | DEN | TEN | NYJ | GB | BAL | bye | BUF | CHI | JAX | DET | TEN | NE | IND | MIN |   
                        | QB | Matt Schaub | 31 | 18.3 | 18.3 | 275 | 275 | 3800 |  | 240 | 230 | 270 | 245 | 225 | 310 | 240 |  | 275 | 215 | 215 | 335 | 240 | 340 | 180 | 240 |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 24 |  | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 12 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 30 |  | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |  | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Arian Foster | 26 | 23.4 | 19 | 351.5 | 285.5 | 1395 |  | 105 | 80 | 115 | 105 | 90 | 105 | 85 |  | 90 | 75 | 100 | 80 | 75 | 80 | 125 | 85 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 13 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 560 |  | 20 | 25 | 45 | 60 | 20 | 50 | 25 |  | 30 | 65 | 30 | 55 | 25 | 70 | 10 | 30 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 66 |  | 3 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 4 |  | 4 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 3 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Ben Tate | 24 | 7.5 | 6.9 | 112.5 | 103.5 | 675 |  | 40 | 30 | 70 | 70 | 25 | 40 | 25 |  | 30 | 40 | 55 | 35 | 40 | 45 | 55 | 75 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 60 |  | 5 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 9 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | James Casey | 27 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 38.5 | 27.5 | 20 |  | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 135 |  | 0 | 0 | 65 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0 |  | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 11 |  | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Andre Johnson | 31 | 18.1 | 12.2 | 235.5 | 158.5 | 1105 |  | 85 | 100 | 55 | 105 | 40 | 115 | 75 |  | 105 | INJ | INJ | 125 | 80 | 100 | 65 | 55 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 8 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | INJ | INJ | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 77 |  | 5 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 9 | 6 |  | 6 | INJ | INJ | 10 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 3 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Kevin Walter | 31 | 6.4 | 3.8 | 95.5 | 56.5 | 445 |  | 40 | 25 | 35 | 25 | 20 | 40 | 30 |  | 40 | 30 | 35 | 40 | 20 | 10 | 30 | 25 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 39 |  | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 |  | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Lestar Jean | 24 | 7.5 | 5.1 | 112 | 77 | 530 |  | 30 | 40 | 20 | 0 | 45 | 25 | 35 |  | 20 | 35 | 70 | 40 | 45 | 50 | 25 | 50 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 35 |  | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 |  | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Owen Daniels | 29 | 9.5 | 5.7 | 142 | 86 | 620 |  | 40 | 40 | 35 | 50 | 65 | 45 | 25 |  | 40 | 50 | 35 | 40 | 30 | 45 | 30 | 50 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 56 |  | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 2 |  | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Garrett Graham | 26 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 41 | 27 | 150 |  | 10 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 0 | 30 |  | 15 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 15 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 14 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |  | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  |  General overview: Perhaps no team 
              currently embodies the old-school mentality of running the ball 
              and playing good defense like the Texans. Houston running backs 
              combined for an astounding 510 carries (and 599 touches) last season 
              totaling 3,367 total yards and 19 touchdowns. (The last team to 
              exceed both carry and touch figures was the 2008 Baltimore Ravens, 
              who managed 522 carries and 605 total touches. However, they were 
              not nearly as productive in the yardage department with 2,688 yards.) 
              In today’s NFL where the passing game rules, the Texans were 
              just one of three teams to run the ball more than it passed in 2011. 
              Despite the loss of the starting right side of their offensive line, 
              the Texans have very little reason to change their run-heavy approach 
              since they believe they have players in-house capable of helping 
              the team pick right back up where it left off in 2011. It could 
              be argued that two of their three best offensive weapons – 
              Arian Foster and Ben Tate – are running backs. The emphasis 
              on the rushing attack was already well in motion before Andre Johnson’s 
              injury woes last season; however, it probably helps the franchise 
              to know it can win games during the regular season without the best 
              player in franchise history, much less claim a division title and 
              make a Super Bowl run with him less than 100%. They also made this 
              same push without QB Matt Schaub, who pretty much took what fantasy 
              value this passing game had away when he was lost for the season 
              in Week 10 with a Lisfranc injury. Schaub averaged 248 yards and 
              1.5 passing touchdowns per game through 10 games; rookie T.J. Yates 
              managed 175 yards and 0.5 scores over his five starts.
 
 Matchup analysis: Considering the 
              talent level of the players in question and their fit within the 
              offensive scheme, the matchups for Foster and Tate are about as 
              appealing as they come. Only Jacksonville (Weeks 2 and 11) and Baltimore 
              (Week 7) strike any real fear in me if I own one of the Texans’ 
              running backs. If Foster can get help your team to a winning record 
              through 11 weeks, he should be an absolute beast during the fantasy 
              playoffs, assuming the Texans don’t have the luxury of resting 
              him due to a huge lead in the division standings. Tate, as was the 
              case on occasion last season, will be useful as a flex in games 
              against the weaker run defenses and/or in potential blowouts. As 
              luck would have it, Weeks 15 and 16 could easily end up being the 
              latter with home games vs. the Colts and Vikings. On a run-heavy 
              offensive team like the Texans, the passing game can be hit or miss. 
              The good news for key players like Schaub and Johnson is that a 
              few of the teams on Houston’s schedule this year may be able 
              to get Houston in a bit of a shootout, which Schaub has thrived 
              in over the years as a Texan. Such games include the Broncos, Titans 
              and Packers before the bye and the Bills, Bears, Lions, Titans and 
              Patriots after it. While many of the matchups are yellow for Schaub 
              due to a lack of notable weapons at receiver, Johnson has the edge 
              in just about every matchup he will see this season outside of a 
              likely showdown against Champ Bailey in Week 3 and a date with shadow 
              corner Darrelle Revis in Week 5. Although Owen Daniels doesn’t 
              exactly deserve to be lumped in with the Texans’ “other” 
              receivers, there were points during last season in which Daniels 
              was nearly as much of an afterthought as Walter or Jacoby Jones 
              (now with the Ravens). Despite the fact that his play hasn’t 
              really dropped off over the past few years, Daniels is now a high-end 
              TE2 option in this run-based attack.
 
 
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Indianapolis Colts |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | CHI | MIN | JAX | bye | GB | NYJ | CLE | TEN | MIA | JAX | NE | BUF | DET | TEN | HOU | KC |   
                        | QB | Andrew Luck | 22 | 18.2 | 18.2 | 273.7 | 273.7 | 3805 |  | 245 | 270 | 285 |  | 290 | 215 | 175 | 295 | 205 | 180 | 300 | 270 | 345 | 325 | 195 | 210 |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 21 |  | 0 | 2 | 2 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 16 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 155 |  | 15 | 5 | 10 |  | 10 | 5 | 5 | 25 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 15 | 10 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Donald Brown | 25 | 7.8 | 6.6 | 93 | 79 | 520 |  | 40 | 55 | 35 |  | 40 | 25 | 90 | 50 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 20 | 65 | 35 | 25 | 40 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 90 |  | 15 | 10 | 5 |  | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 5 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 5 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 14 |  | 2 | 2 | 1 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Vick Ballard | 22 | 8.3 | 7.6 | 125 | 114 | 775 |  | 20 | 40 | 35 |  | 40 | 50 | 70 | 40 | 75 | 50 | 65 | 55 | 60 | 80 | 40 | 55 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 65 |  | 0 | 0 | 10 |  | 5 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 11 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Delone Carter | 25 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 24 | 21 | 130 |  | 15 | 10 | 10 |  | 0 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 15 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 20 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Mewelde Moore | 30 | 5.3 | 2.9 | 73.5 | 40.5 | 135 |  | 10 | 0 | 15 |  | 10 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 20 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 10 | INJ | 10 | 10 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 210 |  | 15 | 10 | 25 |  | 15 | 30 | 5 | 20 | 10 | 0 | 30 | 15 | 10 | INJ | 10 | 15 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 33 |  | 3 | 2 | 3 |  | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | INJ | 2 | 1 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Reggie Wayne | 33 | 12.2 | 7.6 | 182.5 | 113.5 | 835 |  | 70 | 45 | 80 |  | 60 | 30 | 25 | 75 | 55 | 60 | 75 | 40 | 100 | 55 | 25 | 40 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 69 |  | 6 | 4 | 5 |  | 5 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Donnie Avery | 28 | 11.9 | 8.7 | 83 | 61 | 430 |  | 45 | 65 | 30 |  | 20 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | 75 | 85 | 110 | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | 0 | 1 | 1 | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 22 |  | 3 | 4 | 3 |  | 1 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | 3 | 4 | 4 | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Austin Collie | 26 | 11.1 | 6.7 | 155.5 | 93.5 | 695 |  | 40 | 35 | 50 |  | 65 | 35 | 50 | 70 | 35 | INJ | 55 | 20 | 65 | 45 | 80 | 50 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | INJ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 62 |  | 3 | 3 | 5 |  | 6 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 3 | INJ | 5 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 5 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | LaVon Brazill | 22 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 29 | 19 | 190 |  | 0 | 25 | 0 |  | 15 | 35 | 0 | 20 | 30 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 20 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 10 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | T.Y. Hilton | 22 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 28 | 16 | 160 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 10 | 15 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 25 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 12 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Coby Fleener | 23 | 9.2 | 5.9 | 138 | 89 | 650 |  | 30 | 45 | 65 |  | 50 | 35 | 45 | 60 | 25 | 30 | 70 | 55 | 45 | 70 | 10 | 15 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 49 |  | 2 | 4 | 5 |  | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Dwayne Allen | 22 | 7.9 | 5.1 | 118 | 76 | 460 |  | 30 | 35 | 20 |  | 40 | 25 | 15 | 30 | 45 | 20 | 45 | 40 | 30 | 15 | 40 | 30 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 42 |  | 3 | 3 | 2 |  | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 |  |  General overview: As close as the Texans feel like they are to the 
              Super Bowl, the Colts are just about as far away. Indianapolis is 
              in full-rebuilding mode, but at least the new front office had the 
              good sense to surround Peyton Manning’s successor with as 
              many weapons as possible from the draft after dismissing several 
              of the team’s staples (Manning, Pierre Garcon, Joseph Addai, 
              Jeff Saturday – to name a few). As the old cliché goes, 
              young quarterbacks love their tight ends, so the Colts took Andrew 
              Luck’s highly-regarded Stanford teammate in Coby Fleener one 
              round after drafting the top quarterback prospect in years and added 
              the draft’s best all-around tight end one round later in Clemson’s 
              Dwayne Allen. In later rounds, Indianapolis added slot extraordinaire/return 
              specialist T.Y. Hilton and a player they hope will soon replace 
              Garcon is Ohio speedster LaVon Brazill. However, the most interesting 
              move may have been the one Reggie Wayne made, when he decided to 
              remain a Colt – a move that ensures Luck will have the “luxury” 
              of leaning on a proven veteran as he acclimates himself to the league. 
              What he does not figure to have, though, is a proven running back 
              to carry the load for an offense that new HC Chuck Pagano wants 
              to be a physical, smash-mouth unit. Donald Brown came on down the 
              stretch last season, but rookie Vick Ballard strikes me as the type 
              of player that will emerge as the lead back of this committee before 
              the end of the season.
 Matchup analysis: Take a minute to compare Houston’s matchups 
                vs. Indianapolis’ – this is perhaps one of the best 
                examples of the contrast that can occur when grading matchups 
                during the preseason. A veteran quarterback with a strong running 
                game and proven in-his-prime playmaker vs. a rookie quarterback 
                with very little running game and a cast of mostly young receivers 
                playing essentially the same schedule (11 common opponents during 
                the fantasy season). As you can tell, the Colts’ slate looks 
                dreadful while the Texans’ looks more than manageable. Starting 
                with Luck and the passing game, they might get a break in Week 
                2 against Minnesota, but the rest of the first half schedule appears 
                to be quite treacherous. The Bears and Packers should have more 
                than enough pass rush to make Luck uncomfortable, while Wayne 
                will get to face off against Revis and Joe Haden in consecutive 
                weeks. Things lighten up a bit during the first part of the second 
                half of the schedule, but Weeks 12-16 once again figure to overwhelm 
                this offense. Luck owners cannot expect to count on him late in 
                the season as he will play road games against Houston (Week 15) 
                and Kansas City (Week 16) – two defenses that have cornerbacks 
                to shut down Wayne and defenses that figure to be much too talented 
                for the Colts to solve. The running game has similar problems 
                with only one green matchup on the board. Once again, I have the 
                second half of the schedule lightening up for Indianapolis, but 
                how many of the neutral games will actually be competitive? In 
                other words, can we really expect this Colts team to stay in the 
                game long enough against the high-powered offenses of the Titans 
                (twice), Patriots and Lions (both of which are on the road)? Luck 
                will set the stage this season for a potentially dynamic 2013 
                and beyond, but it may be too much to ask any player from this 
                offense (outside of Wayne and maybe Austin Collie as potential 
                WR3s) to be a regular fantasy starter. 
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Jacksonville Jaguars |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | MIN | HOU | IND | CIN | CHI | bye | OAK | GB | DET | IND | HOU | TEN | BUF | NYJ | MIA | NE |   
                        | QB | Blaine 
                          Gabbert | 22 | 15.1 | 15.1 | 150.6 | 150.6 | 2315 |  | 215 | 185 | 255 | 230 | 210 |  | 245 | 190 |  |  |  |  |  | 160 | 255 | 370 |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 10 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 2 | 1 |  |  |  |  |  | 0 | 2 | 2 |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 8 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |  | 1 | 2 |  |  |  |  |  | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 80 |  | 10 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 10 |  | 10 | 10 |  |  |  |  |  | 5 | 5 | 10 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 |  |  |  |  |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | QB | Chad 
                          Henne | 27 | 16.4 | 16.4 | 98.1 | 98.1 | 1240 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 65 | 310 | 200 | 190 | 235 | 240 | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 8 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 45 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 15 | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Maurice 
                          Jones-Drew | 27 | 17.2 | 14.6 | 258.5 | 219.5 | 1250 |  | 85 | 65 | 100 | 75 | 65 |  | 85 | 75 | 100 | 80 | 60 | 110 | 70 | 85 | 115 | 80 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 10 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 285 |  | 15 | 35 | 15 | 10 | 15 |  | 15 | 30 | 40 | 10 | 5 | 25 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 39 |  | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 |  | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 5 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Rashad 
                          Jennings | 27 | 7.5 | 6.2 | 97 | 81 | 515 |  | 25 | 30 | 45 | 40 | 30 |  | 65 | 40 | 50 | 90 | 25 | 30 | INJ | INJ | 30 | 15 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 115 |  | 5 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 5 |  | 5 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | INJ | INJ | 15 | 20 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 16 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | INJ | INJ | 2 | 3 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Laurent 
                          Robinson | 27 | 11.6 | 7.8 | 151 | 101 | 710 |  | 45 | 25 | 75 | 55 | 40 |  | 65 | 50 | 90 | 55 | 30 | INJ | INJ | 30 | 70 | 80 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 1 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 50 |  | 3 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 3 |  | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 2 | INJ | INJ | 3 | 4 | 6 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Justin 
                          Blackmon | 22 | 10.7 | 7.2 | 161 | 108 | 780 |  | 50 | 30 | 55 | 70 | 45 |  | 45 | 65 | 70 | 30 | 40 | 65 | 60 | 10 | 40 | 105 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 53 |  | 4 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 3 |  | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 5 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Mike 
                          Thomas | 25 | 8.9 | 5.1 | 133.5 | 76.5 | 645 |  | 40 | 40 | 35 | 20 | 55 |  | 35 | 30 | 60 | 25 | 70 | 55 | 45 | 40 | 45 | 50 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 57 |  | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 5 |  | 4 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Lee 
                          Evans | 31 | 3.7 | 2.4 | 55.5 | 36.5 | 305 |  | 15 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 10 |  | 25 | 0 | 15 | 30 | 0 | 40 | 45 | 20 | 30 | 40 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 19 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Marcedes 
                          Lewis | 28 | 8.5 | 5.4 | 128 | 81 | 570 |  | 35 | 20 | 40 | 45 | 35 |  | 55 | 40 | 20 | 35 | 15 | 40 | 60 | 45 | 35 | 50 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 47 |  | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 |  | 3 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Zach 
                          Miller | 27 | 2.2 | 1.2 | 21.5 | 11.5 | 115 |  | 10 | 25 | 0 | 15 | 0 |  | 0 | 20 | 15 | 15 | 15 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 10 |  | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ |  |  General overview: There’s no way around it: last year, there 
              was Maurice Jones-Drew…and then the sound of crickets (or 
              passes hitting the ground, take your pick). This offense was abysmal 
              last year and it really shouldn’t have come as a big surprise 
              when the Jaguars decided to roll with Mike Thomas and Jason Hill 
              as their starting receivers, and that was before Jacksonville surprised 
              many of us by releasing David Garrard and promoting Luke McCown. 
              That, of course, did not end well, prompting then-HC Jack Del Rio 
              to perform the face-saving move of rushing rookie Blaine Gabbert 
              into the lineup. The book on Gabbert was that he may need some time 
              to develop and the book did not disappoint in that regard as he 
              finished with the worst passer rating of any regular starter at 
              quarterback in 2011. (On the plus side, his 65.4 QB rating as a 
              rookie was better than those of Hall of Famers Bob Griese, Troy 
              Aikman and Sammy Baugh in their rookie seasons, so there is hope.) 
              However, the Jags attacked this offseason signing the talented yet 
              injury-prone receiver Laurent Robinson and trading up two spots 
              in the draft to secure Justin Blackmon as new HC Mike Mularkey attempts 
              to install his ball-control, big-play passing scheme in Jacksonville. 
              Thomas moves back to where he should be – in the slot – 
              while Marcedes Lewis stands to benefit from all the attention that 
              his new receivers will attract outside the hashmarks. Believe it 
              or not, there is fantasy upside here with Gabbert because he will 
              have NFL-caliber weapons to throw to in 2012, but the question is 
              whether or not he’ll improve at a pace acceptable enough to 
              hold off Chad Henne. Mularkey’s teams have run the ball pretty 
              well everywhere he has coached or called plays, so MJD owners shouldn’t 
              expect much – if any – drop-off based on the coaching 
              change. If his production does fall off, it will likely be because 
              of backup Rashad Jennings nipping at his heels, much like he did 
              in 2010.
 Matchup analysis: All bets are off until MJD reports to camp, 
                but we’ll proceed as if he’ll return in the next week 
                or two. And judging by the relative lack of red on the schedule, 
                it should be one this running game can handle – especially 
                during the middle part of the season. Because the Jags’ 
                defense should be pretty solid and Mularkey loves running the 
                ball, there should be more than enough opportunity for both Jones-Drew 
                and Jennings to be relevant in fantasy (like a poor man’s 
                Foster and Tate in Houston). I certainly wouldn’t expect 
                another rushing title for MJD, but a fourth consecutive 1,300-yard 
                season should be achievable. The outlook is not nearly as bright 
                for the passing game, which will obviously be affected by how 
                much better Gabbert is in his second season. Assuming he makes 
                the improvement I think he can make (but not the one I’m 
                projecting obviously), Gabbert has a chance to be usable during 
                the middle part of the season. I highly doubt owners will want 
                to consider him – even if he is significantly better – 
                before Week 7 or after Week 10, for what it’s worth. Similarly, 
                I feel pretty confident in projecting both Robinson and Blackmon 
                – assuming he doesn’t fall hopelessly behind due to 
                his holdout – to play at low-end WR3 levels because Gabbert’s 
                readiness level does not yet figure to be on par with the receivers’ 
                talent level. As is the case with Gabbert, owners may get some 
                useful games from the pair of newcomers during the middle part 
                of the season. All in all, however, there figures to be a lot 
                more miss than hit with this passing game when it comes to deciding 
                whether Blackmon or Robinson should be in fantasy lineups this 
                season.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Tennessee Titans |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | NE | SD | DET | HOU | MIN | PIT | BUF | IND | CHI | MIA | bye | JAX | HOU | IND | NYJ | GB |   
                        | QB | Jake Locker | 24 | 19.2 | 19.2 | 288.2 | 288.2 | 3730 |  | 240 | 275 | 315 | 235 | 330 | 170 | 260 | 240 | 240 | 275 |  | 240 | 215 | 295 | 160 | 240 |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 23 |  | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 |  | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 15 |  | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 190 |  | 20 | 15 | 5 | 15 | 5 | 25 | 10 | 0 | 20 | 10 |  | 10 | 10 | 10 | 15 | 20 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Chris Johnson | 26 | 19 | 16 | 284.5 | 240.5 | 1315 |  | 105 | 85 | 120 | 55 | 100 | 40 | 90 | 135 | 65 | 90 |  | 70 | 85 | 110 | 75 | 90 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 10 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 370 |  | 15 | 20 | 15 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 50 | 15 | 35 | 15 |  | 15 | 20 | 15 | 30 | 65 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 44 |  | 2 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 2 |  | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Javon Ringer | 25 | 4 | 2.8 | 59.5 | 42.5 | 190 |  | 10 | 15 | 5 | 20 | 10 | 20 | 5 | 20 | 10 | 20 |  | 15 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 10 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 115 |  | 5 | 0 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 5 |  | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 25 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 17 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Kenny Britt | 23 | 10.8 | 7.3 | 86.5 | 58.5 | 405 |  | INJ | INJ | 50 | 40 | 65 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | 40 | 60 | 55 | 15 | 80 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | 1 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 28 |  | INJ | INJ | 3 | 3 | 4 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 5 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Nate Washington | 29 | 13.4 | 9.3 | 201 | 139 | 970 |  | 90 | 70 | 115 | 15 | 75 | 30 | 50 | 65 | 50 | 80 |  | 70 | 40 | 105 | 45 | 70 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 62 |  | 6 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 5 |  | 6 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Kendall Wright | 22 | 9.6 | 6.2 | 125 | 80 | 620 |  | 55 | 65 | 55 | 70 | 65 | 30 | 25 | 50 | 20 | 75 |  | 40 | 25 | 45 | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 45 |  | 4 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 5 |  | 3 | 1 | 3 | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Damian Williams | 24 | 5.5 | 3.1 | 82.5 | 46.5 | 405 |  | 10 | 35 | 20 | 15 | 40 | 50 | 70 | 25 | 15 | 35 |  | 20 | 40 | 0 | 20 | 10 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 36 |  | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 3 |  | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Lavelle Hawkins | 26 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 25 |  | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Jared Cook | 25 | 10.9 | 6.9 | 163 | 104 | 740 |  | 65 | 65 | 40 | 30 | 55 | 40 | 50 | 80 | 25 | 65 |  | 45 | 30 | 65 | 30 | 55 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 59 |  | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 5 |  | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Craig Stevens | 28 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 35 | 23 | 110 |  | 0 | 10 | 5 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 |  | 15 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 15 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 12 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |  |  General overview: Questions abound on a team that has a chance to 
              be incredibly explosive. Who’s going to be the quarterback? 
              When will Kenny Britt ever get things figured out and when will 
              he ever be healthy enough to capitalize on his incredible talent? 
              Can Chris Johnson have another pre-2011 season? When will Jared 
              Cook finally be able to carry over a strong finish from a previous 
              season with a Pro Bowl-caliber performance the following year? All 
              of these are legitimate questions and, as a result, make the Titans 
              a nightmare to project. Because this team will be a vastly different 
              animal if Jake Locker wins the job, I took the unprecedented step 
              to project 15 full games with him as the quarterback and did the 
              same for Matt Hasselbeck. (Because I think the organization is anxious 
              to see what the future holds for them right now, I think Locker 
              wins the job and posted the appropriate projections.) Hasselbeck 
              is certainly a more efficient passer than Locker, but doesn’t 
              the first-round pick from 2011 give Tennessee a better shot to move 
              the ball because of his mobility and big arm? And we’ve seen 
              what the full-time presence of a mobile quarterback can do for his 
              running back in recent years, all of which makes Johnson an interesting 
              fantasy player this season. Britt’s injury and off-field woes 
              may clear the way for Nate Washington, rookie Kendall Wright and 
              Cook to star in this offense – something each of the two veterans 
              proved they were capable of doing at times last season. To what 
              degree they do so this year depends on the quarterback and Britt, 
              all of which is to say this team projection is very fluid.
 Matchup analysis: Fortunately, the Titans’ schedule is 
                such that it presents four legitimately difficult matchups almost 
                across the board (Pittsburgh, New York Jets and twice against 
                Houston), so the quarterback-matchup board will look the same 
                regardless of the camp competition between Hasselbeck and Locker. 
                The winner should get off to a fast start in what should be track-meet 
                games against New England and Detroit and relatively neutral matchups 
                against San Diego and Minnesota. As a whole, two reds and a yellow 
                through 10 pre-bye weeks means the quarterback should have a great 
                deal of success. After the bye, the Titans may want Locker under 
                center in order to use his running ability because Tennessee has 
                four pretty difficult opponents to close out the fantasy season. 
                Of course, the Titans’ offensive plight would be reduced 
                somewhat if Johnson follows up his strong offseason with a return 
                to CJ2K form; Johnson was just the most recent example of why 
                lengthy holdouts do not typically end well. For the average running 
                back (look at Javon Ringer’s line in the table above), this 
                schedule may be enough reason for matchup-conscious owners like 
                myself to worry. But Johnson’s big-play ability along with 
                his receiving skills makes him a relatively safe play on a weekly 
                basis, even after last season. Yes, he does have five yellow-colored 
                matchups to deal with, but a focused Johnson with all the offensive 
                weapons now surrounding him means he should produce like a RB1 
                in all but one or two of those games.
 NFC SOUTH 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Atlanta Falcons |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | KC | DEN | SD | CAR | WAS | OAK | bye | PHI | DAL | NO | ARI | TB | NO | CAR | NYG | DET |   
                        | QB | Matt Ryan | 27 | 23.5 | 23.5 | 352.1 | 352.1 | 4340 |  | 230 | 275 | 335 | 250 | 305 | 255 |  | 245 | 285 | 375 | 295 | 275 | 280 | 270 | 315 | 350 |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 31 |  | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 |  | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 11 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 85 |  | 5 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 |  | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 5 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Michael Turner | 30 | 11.5 | 10.8 | 172.5 | 161.5 | 995 |  | 60 | 70 | 45 | 100 | 55 | 80 |  | 70 | 50 | 60 | 35 | 85 | 105 | 70 | 40 | 70 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 9 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 80 |  | 0 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |  | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 10 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 11 |  | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Jacquizz Rodgers | 23 | 8.1 | 5.7 | 121 | 85 | 300 |  | 25 | 20 | 20 | 10 | 40 | 25 |  | 15 | 15 | 40 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 20 | 10 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 310 |  | 25 | 35 | 25 | 15 | 50 | 15 |  | 0 | 15 | 30 | 5 | 10 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 25 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 36 |  | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 |  | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Jason Snelling | 28 | 6.2 | 4.6 | 92.5 | 68.5 | 355 |  | 15 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 20 | 10 |  | 40 | 20 | 35 | 45 | 35 | 10 | 25 | 25 | 25 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 150 |  | 5 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 5 |  | 15 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 15 | 5 | 25 | 10 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 24 |  | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 |  | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Roddy White | 30 | 17.1 | 11.5 | 256.5 | 172.5 | 1185 |  | 50 | 40 | 90 | 80 | 130 | 100 |  | 60 | 55 | 125 | 50 | 65 | 90 | 60 | 70 | 120 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 9 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 84 |  | 5 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 9 | 6 |  | 4 | 5 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 7 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Julio Jones | 23 | 17.1 | 12.1 | 239 | 170 | 1100 |  | 70 | 60 | 120 | 50 | INJ | 55 |  | 45 | 85 | 75 | 115 | 90 | 40 | 125 | 65 | 105 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 10 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | INJ | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 69 |  | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 | INJ | 3 |  | 3 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 7 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Harry Douglas | 27 | 8.2 | 5.3 | 122.5 | 79.5 | 615 |  | 30 | 45 | 35 | 35 | 50 | 60 |  | 55 | 35 | 75 | 25 | 50 | 40 | 10 | 40 | 30 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 43 |  | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 |  | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Tony Gonzalez | 36 | 12.2 | 7.6 | 183 | 114 | 780 |  | 40 | 60 | 55 | 40 | 35 | 20 |  | 60 | 55 | 60 | 90 | 30 | 55 | 50 | 80 | 50 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 69 |  | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 |  | 5 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 5 |  |  General overview: The plan that GM Thomas Dimitroff set into motion 
              during the NFL Draft in 2011 is starting to round into form. After 
              years of leaning on the ground game, the Falcons are opening things 
              up. Matt Ryan, who did nothing but improve each season in former 
              OC Mike Mularkey’s conservative offensive attack, should have 
              every opportunity to launch an all-out aerial assault under new 
              OC Dirk Koetter. Roddy White and Julio Jones – the apple of 
              Dimitroff’s eye in the aforementioned draft – combine 
              to give Ryan one of the most talented 1-2 punches at receiver in 
              the league. In the rare instance neither receiver is open on a given 
              play, Tony Gonzalez is still around and is almost a lock for at 
              least 60-70 catches. And if that weren’t enough, Jones’ 
              draft classmate Jacquizz Rodgers has the ability to take a draw 
              or screen pass the distance and will be given a chance to do so 
              much more often in 2012. While the emphasis on the passing game 
              might serve as a buzzkill to Michael Turner’s owners, 50-75 
              fewer rushing attempts per season may actually allow him to be an 
              effective fantasy runner during fantasy playoff time and until his 
              contract expires following the end of the 2013 season. If Atlanta 
              follows through with its plan to cater to Ryan’s strengths 
              as a passer and field general – especially when it comes to 
              the no-huddle - this offense could be incredible.
 Matchup analysis: In all my years of analyzing the matchups during 
                the preseason, I’m not sure I’ve ever come across 
                one quite like this – I could not bring myself to label 
                a single matchup red. Certainly, the Falcons have some potentially 
                difficult matchups in the passing game, but which receiver is 
                Denver’s Champ Bailey or Kansas City’s Brandon Flowers 
                going to guard? And when the “other” receiver burns 
                his defender enough times, is Bailey or Flowers going to switch 
                receivers? Unlikely, but I bet the receivers will take turns burning 
                the other cornerback(s) on the opposite side of the formation. 
                More than the absence of red, however, is the preponderance of 
                green, especially at the back end of the schedule. Since I’m 
                assuming defenses will still consider White the top receiver, 
                Ryan and Jones should have a field day carving up the Saints (particularly 
                in the Georgia Dome), Bucs and Lions down the stretch. While White 
                will likely see his share of Aqib Talib, Patrick Robinson, Chris 
                Gamble and Chris Houston over the last seven games of the season, 
                Jones will likely see more of Jabari Greer, Alphonso Smith, Captain 
                Munnerlyn and Eric Wright. While Greer is no slouch, all four 
                defenders are poor matchups for someone of Jones’ stature 
                and playmaking ability. With the offense finally geared towards 
                the talents in the passing game, it is entirely possible Turner 
                will be able to finish the season strong for the first time since 
                2008, the year he joined the team. Of the matchups I marked yellow 
                for Turner, Rodgers and Snelling, only the Chargers and Cardinals 
                give me some pause. I hesitated giving Rodgers any yellows due 
                to the simple fact that he should be used in a capacity similar 
                to Darren Sproles, but I have my doubts that Atlanta wants to 
                commit 86 catches and 173 offensive touches to Rodgers like the 
                Saints did with Sproles a season ago. 
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Carolina Panthers |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | TB | NO | NYG | ATL | SEA | bye | DAL | CHI | WAS | DEN | TB | PHI | KC | ATL | SD | OAK |   
                        | QB | Cam Newton | 23 | 23.4 | 23.4 | 351.4 | 351.4 | 3935 |  | 250 | 305 | 285 | 165 | 225 |  | 320 | 290 | 390 | 235 | 235 | 160 | 215 | 240 | 350 | 270 |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 21 |  | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 16 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |  | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 580 |  | 30 | 25 | 40 | 35 | 35 |  | 35 | 25 | 40 | 60 | 45 | 70 | 20 | 30 | 35 | 55 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | DeAngelo Williams | 29 | 8.2 | 7.5 | 123.5 | 112.5 | 745 |  | 70 | 60 | 35 | 60 | 30 |  | 35 | 30 | 45 | 85 | 70 | 30 | 40 | 25 | 75 | 55 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 80 |  | 5 | 0 | 15 | 10 | 0 |  | 10 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 11 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Jonathan Stewart | 25 | 11.4 | 9.4 | 170.5 | 141.5 | 765 |  | 45 | 75 | 50 | 25 | 65 |  | 45 | 50 | 30 | 45 | 50 | 60 | 75 | 35 | 35 | 80 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 230 |  | 15 | 20 | 10 | 5 | 0 |  | 15 | 10 | 45 | 40 | 10 | 25 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 5 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 29 |  | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Mike Tolbert | 26 | 8.4 | 5.4 | 109.5 | 70.5 | 160 |  | 15 | 5 | 15 | 0 | 10 |  | 25 | 10 | INJ | INJ | 15 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 15 | 10 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 245 |  | 20 | 15 | 25 | 35 | 10 |  | 10 | 25 | INJ | INJ | 15 | 25 | 10 | 20 | 15 | 20 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 39 |  | 3 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 2 |  | 2 | 4 | INJ | INJ | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Steve Smith | 33 | 14.7 | 9.9 | 220 | 148 | 1120 |  | 30 | 105 | 80 | 40 | 75 |  | 90 | 130 | 130 | 40 | 65 | 40 | 50 | 70 | 115 | 60 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 72 |  | 3 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 5 |  | 5 | 7 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 3 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Brandon LaFell | 25 | 8.4 | 5.4 | 125.5 | 81.5 | 575 |  | 50 | 30 | 45 | 15 | 25 |  | 65 | 30 | 25 | 50 | 35 | 0 | 70 | 15 | 65 | 55 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 44 |  | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 |  | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | David Gettis | 25 | 5.7 | 3.4 | 80 | 48 | 420 |  | 30 | 20 | 35 | 10 | 15 |  | 45 | 20 | 40 | 25 | INJ | 20 | 35 | 40 | 45 | 40 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 32 |  | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |  | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | INJ | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Louis Murphy | 25 | 3.8 | 2.5 | 57.5 | 37.5 | 255 |  | 40 | 25 | 0 | 15 | 35 |  | 10 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 45 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 40 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 20 |  | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Greg Olsen | 27 | 10.2 | 6.4 | 153.5 | 96.5 | 725 |  | 30 | 55 | 40 | 25 | 65 |  | 60 | 45 | 80 | 50 | 65 | 20 | 40 | 60 | 70 | 20 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 57 |  | 2 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 5 |  | 6 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Gary Barnidge | 26 | 4.8 | 3.1 | 62.5 | 40.5 | 285 |  | 30 | 35 | 35 | 10 | 0 |  | 15 | 30 | 40 | 25 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 15 | 20 | 30 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 22 |  | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 1 | 2 | 2 |  |  General overview: From a fantasy perspective, they may not be a 
              team that is harder to get a read on entering this season than the 
              Panthers. Cam Newton wasted little time announcing his arrival as 
              a valuable fantasy property, throwing for over 400 yards in each 
              of his first two starts as a pro. From that point on, however, he 
              topped 300 yards just once more time all year as he spearheaded 
              a rushing attack that finished third in the league. Over the final 
              14 games of 2011, Carolina rushed for 2,263 yards – an average 
              of 161.6 yards per game. So are the Panthers a proficient running 
              team with the ability to pass when they want or a passing team that 
              runs because of their depth at running back and relative lack of 
              playmakers at receiver? That question figures to go unanswered into 
              this season since the offense’s most important addition was 
              – you guessed it – another running back. Mike Tolbert 
              isn’t your average running back either, primarily because 
              he is a goal-line specialist who is an asset as a third-down back 
              trapped in a fullback’s body. The NFL has seen players like 
              this before – Larry Centers comes to mind – but it further 
              muddies a backfield picture that really didn’t need to be 
              any more complicated than it already was. Even if he spends most 
              of his time at fullback as the team suggests he will, there’s 
              a very good chance Tolbert takes over the goal-line role from Newton 
              and steals a good deal of the flex appeal of Jonathan Stewart and 
              DeAngelo Williams. When the Panthers do throw the ball this year, 
              Newton figures to lean on Steve Smith once again after he was on 
              the receiving end for 34% of Newton’s passing yards and 33% 
              of his passing touchdowns. Meanwhile, owners of Greg Olsen who believe 
              they have their sleeper top-five tight end now that Jeremy Shockey 
              is gone need to understand the team likes what Gary Barnidge can 
              do as a downfield option; he could very well inherit Shockey’s 
              37 catches and four touchdowns.
 Matchup analysis: Much like some of the elite running backs we’ve 
                discussed over the last few weeks, Newton can generally be considered 
                matchup-proof at the moment because he is both a skilled passer 
                and unbelievable runner. Newton doesn’t have a particularly 
                difficult schedule even if you eliminated his ability as a runner, 
                but he could struggle in games against the Giants (Week 3) and 
                the Falcons (Weeks 4 and 14) because each team has enough athleticism 
                up front to chase him down and the depth and talent necessary 
                to shut down their receivers. Nevertheless, Newton should be an 
                asset in the fantasy playoffs. Smith’s road to fantasy success 
                is a bit more difficult with multiple matchups against the likes 
                of Aqib Talib and the duo of Asante Samuel and Brent Grimes as 
                well as single games against Champ Bailey, Nnamdi Asomugha and 
                Brandon Flowers. As I state in the introduction, I do understand 
                that not all of the top cornerbacks are “shadow” corners, 
                but most of the players I just mentioned in the last sentence 
                will likely fill that role this season for their defense. While 
                the passing game is relatively simple from a fantasy point of 
                view, the running game is an absolute nightmare. Stewart and Williams 
                finished with relatively similar numbers in carries and rushing 
                yards, with the former distinguishing himself in the passing game. 
                Tolbert now figures to get the bulk of that work now, essentially 
                making all three the same kind of back for fantasy purposes. This 
                should go a long way in explaining why all three have the exact 
                same color codes on their schedules. The crowded backfield is 
                a shame for fantasy purpose since outside of a five-game stretch 
                from Week 3-8, Carolina has a relatively soft schedule against 
                the run until the start of the fantasy playoffs. Barring injury, 
                owners may just need to resign themselves to the idea the Panthers 
                just won’t provide them with an every-week starter at the 
                RB position.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | New Orleans Saints |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | WAS | CAR | KC | GB | SD | bye | TB | DEN | PHI | ATL | OAK | SF | ATL | NYG | TB | DAL |   
                        | QB | Drew Brees | 33 | 27.5 | 27.5 | 412.7 | 412.7 | 4930 |  | 380 | 350 | 345 | 355 | 365 |  | 360 | 305 | 280 | 255 | 365 | 330 | 235 | 315 | 355 | 335 |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 38 |  | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 |  | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 12 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 55 |  | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 |  | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Mark Ingram | 22 | 8.9 | 8.3 | 115.5 | 107.5 | 600 |  | 35 | 55 | 45 | 35 | 40 |  | 80 | 45 | 40 | 20 | 80 | 10 | INJ | INJ | 65 | 50 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 1 | 1 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 55 |  | 5 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 |  | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 5 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 8 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Pierre Thomas | 27 | 11.1 | 7.9 | 166 | 118 | 495 |  | 30 | 40 | 50 | 40 | 20 |  | 25 | 35 | 15 | 25 | 15 | 25 | 45 | 75 | 30 | 25 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 385 |  | 25 | 35 | 50 | 30 | 25 |  | 10 | 25 | 40 | 10 | 15 | 50 | 20 | 15 | 10 | 25 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 48 |  | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 |  | 2 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Darren Sproles | 29 | 16.5 | 11.1 | 248 | 167 | 500 |  | 40 | 25 | 35 | 15 | 45 |  | 15 | 25 | 45 | 10 | 75 | 10 | 40 | 25 | 55 | 40 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 690 |  | 45 | 35 | 65 | 55 | 40 |  | 55 | 70 | 55 | 20 | 45 | 50 | 15 | 60 | 45 | 35 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 81 |  | 5 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 5 |  | 6 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 5 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Marques Colston | 29 | 17.1 | 11.3 | 256.5 | 169.5 | 1155 |  | 85 | 100 | 50 | 75 | 65 |  | 90 | 35 | 55 | 75 | 120 | 45 | 80 | 70 | 130 | 80 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 9 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 87 |  | 7 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 5 |  | 7 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 6 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Lance Moore | 29 | 10.4 | 6.5 | 146 | 91 | 610 |  | 35 | 25 | 55 | 70 | 30 |  | 70 | 55 | 40 | 25 | 35 | 40 | INJ | 35 | 55 | 40 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | INJ | 0 | 1 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 55 |  | 3 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 3 |  | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 5 | INJ | 3 | 6 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Devery Henderson | 30 | 6.4 | 4.4 | 96.5 | 66.5 | 485 |  | 65 | 30 | 20 | 45 | 50 |  | 20 | 10 | 15 | 5 | 80 | 25 | 25 | 55 | 10 | 30 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 30 |  | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 |  | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Nick Toon | 23 | 3 | 1.6 | 45 | 24 | 240 |  | 15 | 25 | 45 | 0 | 0 |  | 25 | 30 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 20 | 35 | 10 | 20 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 21 |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 |  | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Jimmy Graham | 25 | 20.1 | 13.5 | 302 | 203 | 1190 |  | 95 | 90 | 45 | 80 | 125 |  | 80 | 70 | 75 | 85 | 55 | 85 | 55 | 70 | 80 | 100 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 14 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 99 |  | 7 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 10 |  | 6 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 8 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | David Thomas | 29 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 32 | 18 | 120 |  | 10 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 20 |  | 10 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 25 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 14 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |  |  General overview: Here’s a number for you: 7,474 - the total 
              number of scrimmage yards the Saints posted last year as they ran 
              a league-high 1,117 plays and gained an NFL-best 6.7 yards per play. 
              For those of you worried about the effect that losing HC Sean Payton 
              for the year due to suspension will have on this offense, consider 
              that OC Pete Carmichael directed an offensive onslaught that averaged 
              476.1 yards and 37 points over the final 10 games of the regular 
              season (slight increases over the 452.1 yards and 29.5 points the 
              team averaged in the six games before Payton’s sideline knee 
              injury). So rest easy, New Orleans: barring a multi-week injury 
              to Drew Brees or Jimmy Graham, your offense isn’t likely to 
              take the foot off the pedal anytime soon. While it is too much to 
              ask the Saints for a repeat virtuoso performance, there is really 
              no reason why they can’t come pretty close. Brees no longer 
              has a contract to worry about, Graham is just in his fourth year 
              of organized football and probably has not hit his ceiling as a 
              player yet and Darren Sproles seemingly does more with 10-12 offensive 
              touches per game than just about any player I can remember. The 
              only true loss from a personnel perspective was Robert Meachem, 
              but the team has long waited for an opportunity to promote Adrian 
              Arrington and just has not had the opportunity to do so. Rookie 
              Nick Toon has also reportedly been impressive during the spring 
              and summer. So, with a defense that should only see marginal improvement 
              in 2012 in an offensive division, New Orleans may be on the verge 
              of another 7,000+ yard season.
 Matchup analysis: On an offense this wide open and aggressive, 
                it’s hard to say there is a single red-worthy matchup for 
                the passing game regardless of the opponent. Graham is nearly 
                impossible to cover at 6-7 and 265 pounds with an incredible catch 
                radius that complements his jaw-dropping athleticism. Although 
                Marques Colston does not have Graham’s freakish athleticism 
                of Graham or his good track record when it comes to durability, 
                Colston presents a similar dilemma for defenses since the Saints 
                love to use him in the slot; not many defenses have slot corners 
                willing or able to guard a 6-4, 225-pound receiver with sticky 
                hands; it is the amount of time that he spends in the slot that 
                helps him avoid any red matchups. Likewise, not many teams have 
                linebackers or safeties with the ability to tackle Sproles. While 
                Brees is certainly capable of having an off day from time to time, 
                it would seem foolish to label any of his matchups as bad ones 
                due to the fact he possesses three “matchup nightmares” 
                with 80-100 catch potential. Lance Moore has made his living in 
                recent years finding holes in zone coverage, so he’s a worthy 
                play anytime the Saints go against a zone-heavy defense while 
                Devery Henderson is a wildly inconsistent fantasy property that 
                should only be targeted when defenses lack good safety play. I 
                reluctantly gave Mark Ingram three reds against the Falcons and 
                Niners, but since his role is as the short-yardage and inside 
                muscle on a team capable of scoring over 30 points a game, it 
                becomes difficult to say he isn’t capable of converting 
                a 1-2 yard scoring plunge against any opponent. Compared to Sproles 
                and Ingram, Pierre Thomas is really the best of both worlds since 
                he has enough size to be a 10-15 carry-per-game player if necessary 
                but is enough of an asset in the passing game (50 catches in 2011) 
                that he is a strong flex option against just about any opponent.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Tampa Bay Buccaneers |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Aver | NPPR Aver | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | CAR | NYG | DAL | WAS | bye | KC | NO | MIN | OAK | SD | CAR | ATL | DEN | PHI | NO | STL |   
                        | QB | Josh Freeman | 24 | 20.5 | 20.5 | 307.8 | 307.8 | 3720 |  | 255 | 235 | 245 | 240 |  | 265 | 310 | 225 | 225 | 360 | 150 | 250 | 200 | 190 | 320 | 250 |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 22 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |  | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 12 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 270 |  | 10 | 25 | 20 | 15 |  | 10 | 20 | 25 | 5 | 40 | 25 | 15 | 15 | 20 | 15 | 10 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Doug Martin | 23 | 15.2 | 12.5 | 227.5 | 187.5 | 1110 |  | 80 | 65 | 50 | 70 |  | 80 | 105 | 65 | 90 | 55 | 115 | 55 | 65 | 70 | 65 | 80 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 285 |  | 20 | 15 | 40 | 10 |  | 15 | 20 | 10 | 5 | 25 | 0 | 15 | 35 | 15 | 45 | 15 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 40 |  | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 |  | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | LeGarrette Blount | 25 | 7.3 | 7 | 95.5 | 90.5 | 625 |  | 55 | 45 | 70 | 25 |  | 40 | 25 | 70 | 65 | 30 | INJ | INJ | 50 | 65 | 30 | 55 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 40 |  | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 15 | INJ | INJ | 10 | 0 | 5 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | INJ | INJ | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Michael Smith | 24 | 3.6 | 2.2 | 54.5 | 32.5 | 150 |  | 20 | 10 | 5 | 10 |  | 15 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 20 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 0 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 175 |  | 15 | 10 | 0 | 15 |  | 15 | 20 | 10 | 0 | 30 | 20 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 15 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 22 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 |  | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Vincent Jackson | 29 | 15.1 | 10.6 | 227 | 159 | 1110 |  | 85 | 75 | 70 | 120 |  | 35 | 90 | 45 | 140 | 85 | 40 | 70 | 35 | 55 | 120 | 45 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 8 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 68 |  | 4 | 5 | 6 | 8 |  | 3 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Mike Williams | 25 | 12.7 | 8.3 | 190.5 | 124.5 | 885 |  | 55 | 40 | 70 | 45 |  | 65 | 75 | 55 | 30 | 100 | 50 | 40 | 70 | 35 | 75 | 80 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 66 |  | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 |  | 4 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 6 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Preston Parker | 25 | 7.1 | 4.1 | 107 | 62 | 500 |  | 40 | 35 | 35 | 20 |  | 55 | 30 | 50 | 10 | 25 | 30 | 40 | 20 | 35 | 20 | 55 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 45 |  | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 |  | 5 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Arrelious Benn | 23 | 4.9 | 2.8 | 58.5 | 33.5 | 275 |  | 10 | 15 | 0 | 20 |  | 40 | 30 | 25 | 25 | 45 | 0 | 50 | 15 | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 25 |  | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 |  | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | INJ | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Luke Stocker | 24 | 1.6 | 1 | 24.5 | 14.5 | 85 |  | 10 | 5 | 15 | 10 |  | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 10 |  | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Dallas Clark | 33 | 4.5 | 2.8 | 67.5 | 41.5 | 295 |  | 20 | 35 | 15 | 0 |  | 30 | 40 | 20 | 15 | 35 | 10 | 25 | 0 | 15 | 15 | 20 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 26 |  | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 |  | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 |  |  General overview: The one team in this division that overhauled 
                their coach and coordinators, the Bucs could be considered something 
                of a mystery team this year. On one hand, they are very likely 
                to be a bruising and physical run-heavy team that has the ability 
                to go deep at will with Vincent Jackson now on the roster. On 
                the other hand, the run defense figures to be among the worst 
                in the league again, which may make it difficult for Tampa Bay 
                to implement Buc-ball each and every game. Lucky for rookie Doug 
                Martin, he is equally adept as a runner and receiver, giving him 
                a substantial advantage over LeGarrette Blount. Jackson’s 
                arrival means less attention (probably offensively and defensively) 
                for Mike Williams but gives Josh Freeman a fighting chance to 
                recapture the form that allowed him to finish as a top-10 fantasy 
                quarterback in 2010. Don’t be surprised if he makes another 
                push into that area, now that he has a respected assistant-turned-OC 
                in Mike Sullivan (formerly Eli Manning’s QB coach) and weapons 
                like Martin and Jackson. Also, keep in mind that Freeman can run 
                the ball a bit (he has averaged nearly 20 yards rushing in 41 
                career games and scored four times in the red zone last season. 
                Having dropped roughly 20 pounds in the offseason and with an 
                offensive emphasis on the run now, Freeman figures to bounce back 
                in a big way as a runner (think a very poor man’s Cam Newton) 
                and thrower with a respectable deep threat and all-purpose running 
                back contributing to his cause. Matchup analysis: One reason I 
                have a reasonable amount of optimism for this Bucs’ offense 
                is the division they play in – the NFC South. Only Atlanta 
                with new DC Mike Nolan and an impressive secondary strikes me 
                as a defense to avoid and Tampa Bay is fortunate to only meet 
                the Falcons once during the fantasy season. The back end of Freeman’s 
                schedule is no cakewalk, but before dismissing him, you should 
                ask yourself: what is the likelihood is that at least three of 
                those final four games will not be high-scoring? Jackson needs 
                Freeman to be on his game in 2012 as the new WR1 has a string 
                of difficult matchups, especially after the bye. Over the final 
                11 weeks, V-Jax will square off against likely shadow corners 
                Brandon Flowers, Chris Cook, Chris Gamble and Cortland Finnegan. 
                In his other yellow and red games, Jackson will see plenty of 
                the Falcons (Brent Grimes and Asante Samuel) and Eagles’ 
                CB duos (Nnamdi Asomugha and Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie) as well 
                as Champ Bailey. Despite his huge contract, Jackson was already 
                a bad bet to post his first 70-catch season and a review of this 
                schedule makes that task even more daunting unless he has taken 
                great strides to develop the short and intermediate parts of his 
                game this offseason. The tough slate for Jackson bodes well for 
                Williams, but how interested is he in maximizing his talent? Much 
                like the case was for Freeman, I’m optimistic Martin has 
                the skills (and offensive line) necessary to perform at a top-end 
                RB2 level this season. In fact, Martin should be in line for an 
                incredible second half of the season if he leaves Blount in his 
                wake during training camp and doesn’t hit the “rookie 
                wall” late in the season.
 Suggestions, comments, 
                musings about the article or fantasy football in general? E-mail 
                me or follow me on Twitter. 
                
 Doug Orth has written for FF Today 
              since 2006, appeared in USA Today’s Fantasy Football Preview 
              magazine in each of the last two seasons and served as a weekly 
              fantasy football analyst for 106.7 The Fan (WJFK – Washington, 
              D.C). He is also a member of the Fantasy Sports Writers Association.
 |