In last week’s column,
I invited readers to share their biggest surprises at QB. I led
off with my own disappointment in Cam “Go Vegan; Get GameChangered”
Newton. My story touched a nerve with Jeff:
I feel your pain. I had almost the exact same experience with
Cam Newton this season. Drafted him in the 9th round; he was my
only QB (why waste a bench spot on a backup QB I would never play,
right?), tried replacing him with decent QBs from the waiver wire
(but was unsuccessful), then with various waiver wire who-dat
streamers, and finally traded for (wait for it) Carson Wentz to
fill the hole. After Wentz was replaced with whatever lousy-at-football
doppleganger is currently wearing #11 for the Eagles, I did eventually
pick up a worthy QB off the wire: Matthew Stafford. [Doh!]
I should say that Cam doesn't carry all the blame for my season
tanking. I was also burned indirectly by the Ben Roethlisberger
injury, since my 2nd round pick was JuJu Smith-Schuster, who seems
to have been killed and replaced by the Invisible Man. My first
round pick was David Johnson - yes, I was burned by the Chase Edmonds game and like most others, I can't really talk about it
any further than that. Plus, my third round pick was Kerryon Johnson,
which was sadly not my first Lions RB fail (Jahvid Best a few
years back...). Along the way, I've dealt with extended absences
and/or early exits from games by Brandin Cooks, Alshon Jeffery,
Evan Engram, Mark Walton, Mohammed Sanu, Deebo Samuels and Emmanuel Sanders. All on the same team - I'm only in one league this year.
All that being said, Cam Newton was the first in a long line
of roster failures this season, and I personally would need a
lot of convincing to ever draft him again.
Oy Jeff. That is one heck of a list of big-name/break out potential
roster clogs you’ve got going there. Let’s both look
forward to not drafting Newton in 2020.
TomJ’s biggest surprise (Kyler Murray) is worth noting if
only because he is now the #5 QB in the FFToday Staff League:
I boldly and confidently kept Mayfield in my keeper league from
last year, just certain he'd tear the league up this year. Then,
in the draft, because the timing happened to be right, I said
"You know, what the heck, don't need him, but I'll grab Kyler
Murray."
So this is purely about just who's on my team, but the *consistency*
of Murray has been the real surprise. I totally expected him to
be boom/bust in his first year, days of 40 points and days of
5. But he's been surprisingly steady, as well as fantasy-good.
(And I've had to rely on him because Mayfield, so I've been paying
attention.) So maybe not the most surprising all season--Minshew
might get that nod. But Murray is who I've been paying more attention
to.
I like this answer from TomJ--if only because it will come as
a shock to some readers who would otherwise have overlooked what
Murray has achieved as a rookie. I also like the way it forces
so many of us to confront what we got wrong about Mayfield heading
into 2019. I warned readers away from him because I thought there
was no chance that we would return value at his ADP, but my argument
was based on his ceiling not being what other people projected.
I didn’t suspect for a moment that his floor would be anywhere
near as low (QB #17 after 12 weeks!) as it has been. As bad as
Carson Wentz has been this year, he’s still 3 notches ahead
of Mayfield.
TomJ isn’t alone, as Kevin and his brother got their Mayfield
and Murray wires crossed in much the same way:
My brother [and I] drafted Jameis Winston and Kyler Murray. Not
bad. We play match-ups.
Early on, we added Josh Allen in case Jameis or Kyler struggled.
Immediately, we traded Josh for Baker Mayfield for upside. Not
good. But it worked out.
Congrats on everything but the Mayfield call, Kevin. Nice squad.
Oddly, the same sort of relationship that TomJ had with Mayfield
and Murray was amplified by Mark’s experience with Wentz
and Jackson:
I took Wentz in the 7th because I was sure he was bouncing back.
He had a favorable schedule, his receivers looked healthy, he
had not one but two high-quality tight-ends and a running back
that could turn catches into TD’s. What could possibly go
wrong? Fortunately, I also took Lamar the Star in the 11th and
he’s played every game since week 2. I dropped Wentz in
Week 7, even though I needed a bye-week replacement for Jackson
in Week 8, because he and the offense looked so bad. In a twist,
a league-mate picked him right up and played him against me, learning
first-hand why I jettisoned him in the first place.
I’m sure everyone who snagged Jackson in the double-digit
rounds can relate to Mark--whether they drafted him as a backup
or not. But if you drafted him as a backup and went on to cut
whichever QB you took first (like Mark did), please quickly tell
your story in the comments below. I suspect it’s a fairly
common narrative this season.
Even though Jackson is almost indisputably the biggest surprise
at QB this season, it’s worth thinking about under-the-radar
figures such as Kyler Murray and Ryan Tannehill, who was nominated
by James:
Know who is getting zero love at QB but has been surprisingly
solid over the last four weeks? Ryan Tannehill. He's the #11 QB
in my league over his last four starts and has been remarkably
consistent: (20.87, 24.23, 21.57, 21.50). Rankings across the
fantasy web still rank him in the bottom five or six QBs; nope,
he's playing good football.
Tannehill deserves even more praise than James gives him here,
since he turned in his best performance of the season after James
posted this comment. Tannehill’s Week 16 game against the
Saints is no cakewalk, but there will presumably be pressure on
the Titans to score. His next 3 opponents (Colts, Raiders, Texans)
are all in the bottom half of the league vs. the pass. I failed
to start him in Week 12 even though I could have. That was dumb.
So even if I don’t think Tannehill is truly more surprising
in 2019 than Jackson, his availability makes him a much more actionable
topic of conversation at this point in the season.
My thanks to everyone who wrote in.
This Week’s Question: Third Quick Quarterly Quiz*
*DO NOT REPEAT any of the answers you gave in Weeks 5 or 9.
According to the scoring system in the FFToday Staff League (FFTSL),
the top 5 QBs after 12 weeks of NFL action are:
1) Lamar Jackson (#1 after Q1; #3 after Q2)
2) Russell Wilson (#3 after Q1; #2 after Q2)
3) Dak Prescott (#4 after Q1; #5 after Q2)
4) DeShaun Watson (outside top 5 [OT5] after Q1; #1 after Q2)
5) Kyler Murray (newcomer)
Patrick Mahomes fell from #1 (Q1) to #7 (Q2) to #10 (Q3). Carson
Wentz fell from #5 (Q1) to #12 (Q2) to #14 (Q3). Aaron Rodgers
climbed to #4 (Q2), but fell back out of the top 5 (#8 after Q3).
Question 1) Which of these top 5 QBs do you consider
most likely to remain in the top 5 through Week 16? (My Q1 answer
was Mahomes; Q2 - Watson; Q3 - Jackson.)
Question 2) Which of these QBs do you consider
least likely to remain in the top 5 through Week 16? (My Q1 answer
was Prescott; Q2 - Rodgers; Q3 - Murray.)
In the FFTSL, the top 5 RBs after 12 weeks of NFL action are:
1) Christian McCaffrey (holding steady)
2) Dalvin Cook (holding steady)
3) Austin Ekeler (#2 after Q1; #4 after Q2)
4) Aaron Jones (OT5 after Q1; #3 after Q2)
5) Leonard Fournette (OT5 after Q1; #5 after Q2)
This is the same list we saw after Q2, but Ekeler & Jones
have swapped positions. Nick Chubb dropped from #4 (Q1) to #6
(Q2), where he remains. Alvin Kamara was #5 (Q1) before falling
to #14 (Q2) and climbing to #13 (Q3).
Question 3) Which of these RBs do you consider
most likely to remain in the top 5 through Week 16? (My Q1 answer
was McCaffrey; Q2 - Jones; Q3 - Cook)
Question 4) Which of these RBs do you consider
least likely to remain in the top 5 through Week 16? (My Q1 answer
was Ekeler; Q2 - Fournette; Q3 - NONE--since I’ve already
used Ekeler & Fournette & declared the other 3 likely
to remain.)
In the FFTSL, the top 5 WRs after 12 weeks of NFL action are:
1) Michael Thomas (OT5 after Q1; #1 after Q2)
2) Chris Godwin (#3 after Q1; #3 after Q2)
3) Mike Evans (#4 after Q1; OT5 after Q2)
4) DeAndre Hopkins (newcomer)
5) D. J. Chark (OT5 after Q1; #5 after Q2)
Keenan Allen was #4 (Q1), but fell to #9 (Q2) and then #12 (Q3).
Cooper Kupp maintained #2 (Q1 & Q2), but fell to #8 (Q3).
Julio Jones climbed from #5 (Q1) to #4 (Q2) only to drop to #9
(Q3).
Question 5) Which of these WRs do you consider
most likely to remain in the top 5 through Week 16? (My Q1 answer
was Julio Jones; Q2 - Thomas; Q3 - Hopkins.)
Question 6) Which of these WRs do you consider
least likely to remain in the top 5 through Week 16? (My Q1 answer
was Kupp; Q2 - Chark; Q3 - Evans.)
In the FFTSL, the top 5 TEs after 12 weeks of NFL action are:
1) Travis Kelce (#4 after Q1; #2 after Q2)
2) Zach Ertz (newcomer)
3) Austin Hooper (#2 after Q1; #1 after Q2)
4) Mark Andrews (#3 after Q1; #5 after Q2)
5) Darren Waller (#5 after Q1; #3 after Q2)
Everyone but Ertz appeared on this list after Q1 and Q2. Evan
Engram fell from #1 (Q1) to #4 (Q2) to #8 (Q3).
Question 7) Which of these TEs do you consider
most likely to remain in the top 5 through Week 16? (My Q1 answer
was Kelce; Q2 - Waller; Q3 - Ertz.)
Question 8) Which of these TEs do you consider
least likely to remain in the top 5 through Week 16? (My Q1 answer
was Hooper; Q2 - Andrews; Q3: NONE--since I’ve already used
Hooper and Andrews and declared Kelce, Ertz, & Waller likely
to remain.)
In the FFTSL, the top 5 defenses after 12 weeks of NFL action
are:
1) Patriots (holding steady)
2) 49ers (OT5 after Q1; #2 after Q2)
3) Steelers (#5 after Q1; #4 after Q2)
4) Ravens (newcomers)
5) Jets (#4 after Q1; OT5 after Q2)
The Bears dropped from #2 (Q1) to #10 (Q2) to #16 (Q3). The Buccaneers
fell all the way from #3 (Q1) to #16 (Q2) before climbing back
to #15 (Q3). The Panthers and Giants were both outside the top
5 after Q1, but the Panthers climbed to #3 (Q2) before falling
to #6 (Q3), whereas the Giants clawed their way to #5 (Q2) only
to drop back down to #13 (Q3).
Question 9) Which of these defenses do you consider
most likely to remain in the top 5 through Week 16? (My Q1 answer
was the Bears; Q2 - Patriots; Q3 - 49ers.)
Question 10) Which of these defenses do you consider
least likely to remain in the top 5 through Week 16? (My Q1 answer
was the Steelers; Q2 - Giants; Q3 - Jets.)
Once again, I encourage readers to record their answers to the
quiz in the comment section below or by emailing
me (especially if they include explanations for their choices).
FYI, this is a lot harder than it looks, especially when you throw
in the wrinkle of not reusing any names. We’ll get the final
answers after the Week 16 games (because Week 17 is mostly meaningless
for fantasy).
The most important lesson I’ve learned from this exercise
is how poor our (or at least MY) power of prediction is when it
comes to defenses. In Week 5, I picked the Steelers to drop out
of the top 5 because I thought their offense would be terribad
without Big Ben, which meant the defense was bound to be overworked.
Well, things have been pretty terribad for the Pittsburgh offense,
but the Steeler defense has climbed up one spot each quarter in
terms of fantasy production. These developments can’t surprise
us if we don’t know what our expectations are, so I invite
you to use this quiz as an opportunity to expose some of your
expectations to yourself.
Survivor Pool Picks
#3 Chiefs over Raiders (10-2; PHI, BAL, SF, lar, NE, WAS,
GB, NO, SEA, ind, MIN, BUF)
There are three 10-point favorites this week. Two of them (Kansas
City and Carolina) are at home; the other (Philadelphia) is on
the road. The order in which I have them ranked here has less
to do with my preferences than with which teams have been used
in which slots to this point in the season. However, I do have
the least faith in the AFC West battle between the Raiders and
the Chiefs. Intradivisional games always make me nervous, but
this one is especially worrisome because the Chiefs aren’t
firing on all cylinders, while the Raiders are capable of being
sneaky good (at least in flashes). Still, I expect Patrick Mahomes
and company to take care of business en route to reminding the
world that the Ravens aren’t the only Super Bowl contenders
not coached by Bill Belichick in the AFC.
#2 Eagles over Dolphins (7-5; HOU, BAL, NE, ind, kc,
lac, SF, MIN, BUF, no, car, CHI)
Carson Wentz has been hurt. He has also been bad. Maybe he will
continue to be both against Miami, but that seems unlikely (considering
how well other QBs have fared vs. the Dolphins). Road games usually
make me nervous, but does anyone foresee a particularly loud and
rowdy crowd turning out to support … the 2-9 Miami Dolphins
… in Week 13 … fur friggin’ realz? As poorly
as the Eagles played against the Patriots and Seahawks, no one
confuses the Dolphins with either of those teams. And with the
Philadelphia secondary having bounced back from injury, this might
be the week that the Fitzmagical enchantment of DeVante Parker
is finally broken.
Kyle Allen and the Panthers are coming off a heartbreaking 34-31
loss to the Saints, a team that could very easily end up representing
the NFC in the Super Bowl. Now they face a 2-9 Redskins team that
isn’t headed anywhere. I don’t blame the Skins for
using the balance of a lost season to find out what they have
in Dwayne Haskins, but the rookie QB has shown little to inspire
confidence in the Washington faithful. Maybe he’ll be good
next year. As for this year, well, he’s been far more likely
to fumble or throw an interception than to complete a TD pass.
Look for that trend to continue against the Panthers.
Mike Davis has been writing about fantasy football since 1999--and
playing video games even longer than that. His latest novel (concerning
a gamer who gets trapped inside Nethack after eating too many shrooms)
can be found here.