| 
  
                
  
 A d v e r t i s e m e n t Along with excitement that football is near, the first week of 
                training camp usually brings about its share of injuries – 
                most of which only seem to be of the season-ending variety. Last 
                year, Jeremy Maclin and Dennis Pitta were among the first notable 
                players to go down. This year hasn’t claimed any big names 
                yet, but the season-ending injuries to Vick Ballard and Kendall 
                Hunter should serve as a pretty good reminder that no team – 
                fantasy or real – is ever too deep. A couple of months ago, 
                the San Francisco 49ers appeared to have five potentially capable 
                running backs fighting for four spots. Now, they have an aging 
                vet (Frank Gore), a second-round rookie that never made it through 
                a full season in college (Carlos Hyde) and a back in Marcus Lattimore 
                that is still being treated with kid gloves and has admitted he 
                needs to cross a mental hurdle nearly two years after his horrific 
                college knee injury. Season-ending injuries at any time of the year are unfortunate. 
                However, if they are going to happen, fantasy owners should be 
                thankful for the ones that happen now as opposed to Week 1 or 
                Week 2. Ballard and Hunter’s absences aren’t going 
                to be felt nearly as much as Maclin and Pitta’s were last 
                year, but don’t think for a second that another one (or 
                handful) isn’t/aren’t coming in the next few weeks. 
                For all the safety measures that have been instituted into football 
                in recent years, it is still a violent and cruel sport. Just like 
                the real game, the fantasy teams and owners that find themselves 
                playing for something at the end of the season typically are the 
                ones that either avoided key injuries and/or handled adversity 
                the best. Two weeks ago, I kicked 
                off my sixth year of projecting each player on every team game-by-game, 
                two divisions at a time. Last 
                week, I provided a look inside the AFC and NFC North. This 
                week, we’ll dive inside the AFC and NFC South.
 Here’s a quick explanation of what each of the colors mean 
                in each team’s projection chart below:
 Red – A very difficult matchup. 
                For lower-level players, a red matchup means they should not be 
                used in fantasy that week. For a second- or third-tier player, 
                drop your expectations for them at least one grade that week (i.e. 
                from WR2 to WR3). For elite players, expect them to perform one 
                level lower than their usual status (i.e. RB1 performs like a 
                RB2). Yellow – Keep expectations 
                fairly low in this matchup. For lower-level players, a yellow 
                matchup is a borderline start at best. For a second- or third-tier 
                player, they can probably overcome the matchup if things fall 
                right. For the elite players, expect slightly better than average 
                production. White – Basically, this matchup 
                is one that could go either way. In some cases, I just don’t 
                feel like I have a good feel yet for this defense. Generally speaking, 
                these matchups are winnable matchups for all levels of players. Green – It doesn’t 
                get much better than this. For non-elite players, the stage is 
                basically set for said player to exploit the matchup. For the 
                elite player, this matchup should produce special numbers. For an example as to the amount of possibilities and factors 
                I consider, take a look below at the Indianapolis Colts’ 
                projections. T.Y. Hilton does not have a single “red” 
                on his schedule because: 1) there is a lack of upper-echelon cornerbacks 
                on his schedule and 2) most of the top cornerbacks he could face 
                in a given week – such as Denver’s Aqib Talib or Cleveland’s 
                Joe Haden – will either guard Reggie Wayne or not follow 
                Hilton when he moves into the slot. In other cases (which I will 
                discuss as we move along with these projections), players such 
                as Philadelphia’s Brandon Boykin can get exposed if they 
                play anywhere but the slot. Most receivers see a lot of time on 
                both sides of the formation (left and right) while the majority 
                of today’s cornerbacks remain on one side. And really, that 
                is just the tip of the iceberg when I hammer out these projections. 
                As you can tell, a lot of thought goes into this. Here are some final notes to help you understand what you see 
                below in the tables: 
 Notes:
 
 
                The gray highlight in each team’s schedule reflects 
                  a road game and the numbers above them correspond to the weeks 
                  of the season. Black boxes represent bye weeks.
 
These are my initial projections and therefore subject 
                  to change. In a few cases, the changes will be dramatic. Changes 
                  may come in the form of a different-colored matchup and/or a 
                  player’s “game log”. In some cases, a strong 
                  preseason may warrant the inclusion of one name in a team projection 
                  and the removal of another.
 
For all those readers whose eyes gravitate immediately 
                  to the player’s final numbers: they are 15-game 
                  totals because most fantasy seasons have a Week 16 title 
                  game. Additionally, players with fewer than 10 projected catches 
                  or 100 projected yards have been removed, which will explain 
                  the discrepancy in some of the quarterback’s final numbers.
 
The age you see by each player will be that player’s 
                  age as of September 1, 2014. 
  Key to the table below: PPR Avg - Points per 
                game in full-point PPR leagues where all touchdowns are worth 
                six points.NPPR Avg - Points per game in non-PPR 
                leagues where all touchdowns are worth six points.
 PPR - Total points scored in PPR
 Non-PPR - Total points scored in 
                non-PPR.
 
 AFC South
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Houston Texans |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Avg | NPPR Avg | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | WAS | OAK | NYG | BUF | DAL | IND | PIT | TEN | PHI | bye | CLE | CIN | TEN | JAC | IND | BAL |   
                        | QB | Ryan Fitzpatrick | 31 | 17.9 | 17.9 | 251.1 | 251.1 | 3465 |  | 250 | 255 | 240 | 305 | 320 | 255 | 185 | 225 | 345 |  | 210 | 275 | 285 | 255 | 60 | INJ |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 19 |  | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |  | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | INJ |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 16 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |  | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | INJ |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 185 |  | 30 | 10 | 20 | 20 | 5 | 15 | 10 | 15 | 25 |  | 10 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 0 | INJ |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | QB | Tom Savage | 24 | 15 | 15 | 29.9 | 29.9 | 460 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 235 | 225 |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 | 1 |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 15 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 5 | 10 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Arian Foster | 28 | 18.7 | 14.7 | 281 | 220 | 1185 |  | 80 | 115 | 70 | 55 | 120 | 70 | 60 | 75 | 60 |  | 85 | 75 | 110 | 65 | 85 | 60 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 475 |  | 30 | 20 | 35 | 25 | 50 | 40 | 15 | 25 | 70 |  | 10 | 35 | 20 | 30 | 50 | 20 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 61 |  | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 6 |  | 2 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 3 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Andre Brown | 27 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 56.5 | 50.5 | 280 |  | 20 | 15 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 25 | 10 | 20 | 15 |  | 15 | 25 | 10 | 25 | 30 | 20 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 45 |  | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |  | 5 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Andre Johnson | 33 | 16.6 | 10.5 | 249.5 | 157.5 | 1275 |  | 80 | 80 | 70 | 85 | 115 | 70 | 80 | 75 | 130 |  | 55 | 80 | 125 | 115 | 60 | 55 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 92 |  | 6 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 8 |  | 5 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 5 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | DeAndre Hopkins | 22 | 12.6 | 8.4 | 188.5 | 126.5 | 905 |  | 65 | 75 | 50 | 90 | 65 | 50 | 40 | 55 | 65 |  | 60 | 105 | 50 | 20 | 75 | 40 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 62 |  | 5 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 |  | 4 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Mike Thomas | 27 | 3.1 | 1.6 | 46 | 24 | 240 |  | 20 | 0 | 5 | 30 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 10 | 35 |  | 10 | 0 | 35 | 10 | 20 | 25 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 22 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | DeVier Posey | 24 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 23 | 12 | 120 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 0 | 20 | 0 |  | 10 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 11 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 |  | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Garrett Graham | 28 | 8.7 | 5.5 | 104.5 | 65.5 | 415 |  | 30 | 35 | 45 | 55 | 15 | 20 | INJ | 40 | 10 |  | 35 | INJ | INJ | 45 | 35 | 50 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | INJ | INJ | 1 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 39 |  | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 2 | INJ | 3 | 1 |  | 3 | INJ | INJ | 5 | 3 | 5 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | C.J. Fiedorowicz | 22 | 7 | 4.6 | 104.5 | 68.5 | 445 |  | 25 | 45 | 25 | 10 | 40 | 25 | 45 | 0 | 35 |  | 25 | 30 | 55 | 30 | 20 | 35 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 36 |  | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 |  | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 |  |  General overview: Questions abound 
              at just about every skill position in Houston. On the surface, the 
              Texans have one of the worst quarterback situations in the league. 
              Or do they? Fitzpatrick is a notorious fast starter with a better 
              supporting cast than he has probably ever had. For years, the cold 
              and windy Buffalo winters received the blame for his second-half 
              letdowns. This season, the Ivy League gunslinger’s last outdoor/non-warm 
              weather game during the fantasy season figures to be in Cleveland 
              in Week 11. Fitzpatrick is far from the only question mark in Houston, 
              however, as the offense figures to revolve around Foster, but is 
              he going to be healthy enough to carry it? New HC Bill O’Brien 
              has already stated that he sees the injury-prone Brown as a two-down 
              back only, so if Foster is truly in the decline phase portion of 
              his career already and/or suffers another long-term injury, then 
              Houston is in trouble. The other major question mark: how quickly 
              Johnson will acclimate himself to O’Brien’s playbook 
              after missing OTAs? Fitzpatrick reportedly became fast on-field 
              friends with Hopkins during offseason practices, so is this the 
              year in which Johnson begins to drop off from the 80-100 catch wideout 
              we have come to know and love? At tight end, Graham will immerse 
              himself into the “F” role (Aaron Hernandez’s old 
              spot with O’Brien’s Patriots earlier in this decade) 
              while Ryan Griffin and Fiedorowicz battle it out at “Y” 
              (Rob Gronkowski’s position). None of the Texans’ options 
              are as talented as New England’s, so who wins out between 
              Griffin and Fiedorowicz and will it matter in fantasy?
 Matchup 
                analysis: If the extra time he had off last season proves 
                to be helpful to his body, then Foster has a wonderful opportunity 
                to enjoy the kind of season that made him a fantasy superstar 
                since his 2010 breakout. Most of the best run defenses he figures 
                to face are from the AFC North, although only Baltimore (Week 
                16) has a great chance to be among the best in the league. However, 
                one poorly-placed matchup in the fantasy title game shouldn’t 
                be enough to keep owners from investing into him as a RB2 because 
                whatever ills his improved offensive line doesn’t cure, 
                volume should. O’Brien has already suggested Foster will 
                also fill the Kevin Faulk and Danny Woodhead role in his offense 
                as well, meaning the soon-to-be sixth-year veteran’s only 
                roadblock to another huge fantasy season is his ability to carry 
                another massive workload. The story is very much the same for 
                Johnson and Hopkins, who both have exceedingly smooth schedules 
                in the first half of the season as only the Giants’ much-improved 
                secondary in Week 3 can really match up to them talent-wise. Johnson 
                will also get challenged by Buffalo’s Stephon Gilmore (Week 
                4), Haden in Week 11 and perhaps Indianapolis’ Vontae Davis 
                (on occasion) in Weeks 6 and 15, but all are battles he is more 
                than capable of winning. Hopkins probably has it even easier, 
                with Pittsburgh’s Cortez Allen (Week 7) possibly the best 
                cornerback he will see outside of the Giants’ Prince Amukamara 
                (Week 3) in the first half of the season. Cleveland (Week 11), 
                Cincinnati (Week 12) and Baltimore could all be top-level pass 
                defenses by the second half of the season, but I don’t see 
                a defense with two near-elite corners capable of keeping both 
                Johnson and Hopkins in check all game. Of course, all this bodes 
                well for Fitzpatrick, who could easily maintain respectable fantasy 
                QB2 numbers all season long and even has an outside shot at finishing 
                among the top 15-16 at his position if keeps the job all year 
                (which he should do if he stays healthy).
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Indianapolis Colts |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Avg | NPPR Avg | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | DEN | PHI | JAC | TEN | BAL | HOU | CIN | PIT | NYG | bye | NE | JAC | WAS | CLE | HOU | DAL |   
                        | QB | Andrew Luck | 24 | 24.5 | 24.5 | 367.4 | 367.4 | 4310 |  | 320 | 285 | 320 | 245 | 260 | 280 | 260 | 300 | 285 |  | 245 | 310 | 345 | 245 | 280 | 330 |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 27 |  | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 10 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 290 |  | 20 | 35 | 10 | 30 | 15 | 35 | 25 | 5 | 10 |  | 15 | 25 | 25 | 15 | 20 | 5 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Trent Richardson | 24 | 14.6 | 11.4 | 219 | 171 | 990 |  | 60 | 75 | 50 | 85 | 50 | 70 | 45 | 60 | 85 |  | 35 | 65 | 75 | 75 | 60 | 100 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 300 |  | 25 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 35 | 10 | 20 |  | 35 | 10 | 30 | 15 | 10 | 15 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 48 |  | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3 |  | 5 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Ahmad Bradshaw | 28 | 6 | 4.5 | 59.5 | 44.5 | 275 |  | 20 | 30 | 30 | 45 | 20 | 30 | 50 | 20 | INJ |  | INJ | INJ | 10 | 20 | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | INJ |  | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 110 |  | 20 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 10 | INJ |  | INJ | INJ | 10 | 10 | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ |  | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 15 |  | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | INJ |  | INJ | INJ | 1 | 1 | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Dan Herron | 25 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 33.5 | 28.5 | 195 |  | 10 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 10 |  | 20 | 30 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 25 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 30 |  | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |  | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Reggie Wayne | 35 | 14.5 | 9.2 | 217.5 | 138.5 | 1025 |  | 50 | 75 | 85 | 65 | 65 | 70 | 75 | 50 | 60 |  | 35 | 100 | 85 | 75 | 70 | 65 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 79 |  | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 4 |  | 2 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 5 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | T.Y. Hilton | 24 | 15.7 | 10.8 | 235.5 | 162.5 | 1205 |  | 110 | 35 | 115 | 40 | 85 | 125 | 40 | 90 | 70 |  | 25 | 70 | 125 | 65 | 100 | 110 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 73 |  | 7 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 5 |  | 2 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 6 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Hakeem Nicks | 26 | 10 | 6.5 | 119.5 | 77.5 | 535 |  | 40 | 85 | 30 | 45 | 35 | INJ | 50 | 60 | 50 |  | 50 | 40 | 20 | 30 | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 42 |  | 3 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 3 | INJ | 4 | 5 | 4 |  | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Coby Fleener | 25 | 6.3 | 4 | 94.5 | 59.5 | 415 |  | 25 | 10 | 35 | 15 | 25 | 25 | 10 | 20 | 25 |  | 40 | 30 | 50 | 10 | 50 | 45 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 35 |  | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |  | 3 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Dwayne Allen | 24 | 8.6 | 5.6 | 129.5 | 83.5 | 535 |  | 30 | 40 | 20 | 45 | 30 | 10 | 15 | 40 | 55 |  | 60 | 45 | 25 | 40 | 20 | 60 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 46 |  | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |  | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5 |  |  General overview: The Colts are an 
              interesting prohibitive favorite in their division in that they 
              are still a team in transition. Given his defensive background, 
              HC Chuck Pagano probably would love nothing more than for Indianapolis 
              to be a smash-mouth team on offense that wins just about as many 
              games on defense as it does on offense. The defense has improved 
              over his first two years of leadership, but Richardson’s 2013 
              dud following his early-season trade from Cleveland has the running 
              game in roughly the same spot now as it was when Pagano arrived, 
              especially after sparkplug Donald Brown bolted for the Chargers. 
              For all the good things GM Ryan Grigson has done since he took over 
              in Indianapolis, he has yet to add a blue-chip offensive lineman 
              to the mix. The Colts did use their first pick in May – a 
              second-round selection – on versatile OL Jack Mewhort, but 
              his addition was about the only notable one on a unit that needs 
              more power to make Richardson is the right fit in Indianapolis. 
              There’s not a lot of evidence that Richardson is “the 
              man” after two years in the league, but one only needs to 
              remember he scored 12 total touchdowns and rushed for nearly 1,000 
              yards as a rookie in 2012 behind a Browns’ offensive line 
              that was essentially the same one that could not support one running 
              back worth owning following his trade. Coming off an ACL injury, 
              Wayne should be the biggest question mark, but he may not even be 
              that at his own position since Nicks inked a one-year deal in the 
              offseason. The good news is that Nicks probably can’t be any 
              worse than Darrius Heyward-Bey was, but the bad news is the ex-Giant 
              hasn’t looked like himself since 2011. Have his chronic foot 
              injuries made him a league-average receiver already? Was he trying 
              to “protect himself” in his contract year last year? 
              Or will the move from Eli Manning to Luck be enough to revive his 
              career?
 Matchup analysis: After 
                OC Pep Hamilton stuck with the run last year long after he should 
                have realized he didn’t have the linemen necessary to carry 
                out a power rushing attack, expect him to be less stubborn in 
                his second season as a play-caller against a bevy of opponents 
                that lack the depth to contain Luck and all of his weapons in 
                the passing game. Luck doesn’t have the easiest of schedules, 
                but it is also far from the most difficult since this division 
                and the NFC East contain a number of soft pass defenses, meaning 
                the biggest impediment to his rise to the top of the fantasy quarterback 
                mountain could be Hamilton. Owners have a right to be leery about 
                a player like Wayne entering his age-35 season and coming off 
                such a serious injury, but given the fact that he is no longer 
                the sole focus of defensive coordinators trying to stop the Colts’ 
                passing game, he represents solid value in the eighth round. Although 
                Revis (Week 11) and Haden (Week 14) may be able to shadow the 
                old man, Wayne has plenty of green and white boxes to be a top-end 
                WR3 in fantasy if his knee holds up. Hilton carried the passing 
                game at times following Wayne’s season-ending injury and 
                probably shouldn’t see that big of a hit to his numbers 
                even if the longtime vet plays all 16 games. Hilton, like Randall 
                Cobb last week, works out of the slot so much that he is going 
                to be a threat to blow up every week; most defenses simply do 
                not have a slot corner capable of defending him. As for Richardson, 
                he still has enough working against him. In addition to the fact 
                that his power game does not fit well with the Colts’ mostly-finesse 
                front five, the AFC North and South should contain a fair number 
                of solid run defenses. Denver (Week 1) should be improved in that 
                regard as well, while teams like the Broncos, Eagles (Week 2) 
                and Redskins (Week 13) could all make the game enough of a track 
                meet where Richardson becomes a bit of a forgotten man.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Jacksonville Jaguars |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Avg | NPPR Avg | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | PHI | WAS | IND | SD | PIT | TEN | CLE | MIA | CIN | DAL | bye | IND | NYG | HOU | BAL | TEN |   
                        | QB | Chad Henne | 29 | 13.5 | 13.5 | 162.3 | 162.3 | 2670 |  | 210 | 300 | 235 | 195 | 185 | 285 | 205 | 230 | 175 | 220 |  | 190 | 240 | BEN | BEN | BEN |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 13 |  | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |  | 0 | 1 | BEN | BEN | BEN |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 15 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  | 3 | 2 | BEN | BEN | BEN |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 75 |  | 5 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 5 |  | 5 | 10 | BEN | BEN | BEN |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | BEN | BEN | BEN |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | QB | Blake Bortles | 22 | 18.9 | 18.9 | 56.6 | 56.6 | 715 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 250 | 185 | 280 |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 | 1 | 2 |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 2 | 2 | 1 |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 80 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 35 | 15 | 30 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Toby Gerhart | 27 | 16.1 | 13.2 | 225.5 | 184.5 | 1110 |  | 80 | 110 | 55 | 85 | 100 | 75 | 45 | INJ | 70 | 125 |  | 80 | 70 | 70 | 55 | 90 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 315 |  | 20 | 35 | 50 | 15 | 10 | 35 | 15 | INJ | 20 | 10 |  | 20 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 25 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 41 |  | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 3 | INJ | 2 | 1 |  | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Denard Robinson | 23 | 3.8 | 3 | 53.5 | 42.5 | 265 |  | 25 | 15 | 15 | 35 | 10 | 35 | 15 | 10 | 15 | 10 |  | 40 | 20 | 15 | 5 | INJ |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 100 |  | 10 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 25 |  | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | INJ |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 11 |  | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | INJ |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Jordan Todman | 24 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 42 | 33 | 180 |  | 10 | 0 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 25 | 55 | INJ | INJ |  | INJ | 10 | 5 | 10 | 25 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | INJ | INJ |  | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 90 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 15 | 20 | INJ | INJ |  | INJ | 0 | 20 | 10 | 15 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ |  | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 9 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | INJ | INJ |  | INJ | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Cecil Shorts | 26 | 13.5 | 8.3 | 175 | 108 | 840 |  | 65 | 110 | 70 | 40 | 65 | 70 | INJ | INJ | 50 | 75 |  | 40 | 50 | 70 | 60 | 75 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 67 |  | 5 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 7 | INJ | INJ | 4 | 4 |  | 3 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 6 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Marqise Lee | 22 | 9 | 5.8 | 135.5 | 87.5 | 635 |  | 35 | 55 | 20 | 40 | 55 | 70 | 10 | 25 | 60 | 45 |  | 30 | 40 | 60 | 25 | 65 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 48 |  | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |  | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Allen Robinson | 21 | 6.7 | 4.2 | 100 | 63 | 450 |  | 30 | 40 | 10 | 50 | 20 | 20 | 65 | 55 | 15 | 30 |  | 30 | 15 | 30 | 10 | 30 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 37 |  | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 |  | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Ace Sanders | 22 | 2.7 | 1.4 | 30 | 15 | 150 |  | SUS | SUS | SUS | SUS | 10 | 10 | 25 | 30 | 10 | 0 |  | 10 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 15 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | SUS | SUS | SUS | SUS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 15 |  | SUS | SUS | SUS | SUS | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Marcedes Lewis | 30 | 8.1 | 5.1 | 121 | 76 | 520 |  | 40 | 35 | 55 | 20 | 10 | 40 | 40 | 60 | 20 | 25 |  | 30 | 35 | 45 | 30 | 35 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 45 |  | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 2 |  | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Clay Harbor | 27 | 4 | 2.5 | 60 | 38 | 260 |  | 10 | 0 | 20 | 30 | 0 | 30 | 20 | 35 | 0 | 10 |  | 20 | 40 | 10 | 15 | 20 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 22 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 |  |  General overview: When a team ranks 
              last in scoring in this offensive era, changes (and usually a lot 
              of them) will be made. The Jaguars got a much-needed infusion of 
              youth and talent through the draft and free agency, perhaps leaving 
              fantasy owners with a player or two they can count on for the majority 
              of the 2014 season. The most important addition for fantasy purposes 
              is Gerhart, who is probably one of three or four runners with a 
              realistic at 300 carries if he can hold up for 16 games. Jacksonville’s 
              secondary figures to remain a weak link to its defense, but for 
              the games in which it can hold up, Gerhart should push 20-25 carries 
              in those contests because the Jags should have a much better run 
              defense. Denard Robinson is reportedly recovered from the nerve 
              issue that dogged him at the end of his college career as well as 
              his rookie season and could become the team’s preferred choice 
              as the change-of-pace back. Todman proved he could handle that role 
              as well last year, although it should be said that HC Gus Bradley 
              has made it clear that is all he sees Robinson and Todman as – 
              change-of-pace backs. With the selection of second-round WRs Lee 
              and Allen Robinson, Jacksonville should eventually have enough firepower 
              to drastically improve their 15.4 point-per-game mark from a season 
              ago. Furthermore, the two rookies should allow Shorts to spend much 
              more time in the slot, enabling Henne to target his favorite receiver 
              against the defense’s nickelback on a more regular basis. 
              As far as Henne is concerned, the odds seem long that he will start 
              all 16 games. Despite all of its improvements, Jacksonville will 
              probably be out of the playoff race by around Week 15 or 16, which 
              would give the coaching staff a nice window in which to evaluate 
              Bortles before turning things over to him in 2015.
 Matchup 
                analysis: Just like Maurice Jones-Drew has been in recent 
                years from the running back position, Gerhart will easily be the 
                most relevant Jaguar in fantasy. Volume – be it on the ground 
                or through the air – should not be a problem for him, which 
                means durability and game situation will make more of a difference 
                to him than matchups in a lot of cases, although he is probably 
                going to get his yards regardless since he is an asset as a receiver. 
                As a result, the ex-Viking could see a lot of work in the passing 
                game through the first five weeks simply because each team has 
                the weapons to pick apart Jacksonville’s secondary. Weeks 
                6-10 offer less dynamic offenses, while the five post-bye games 
                provide a healthy mixture of both. It is virtually impossible 
                to predict what Shorts might do for a number of reasons: 1) he 
                has yet to play a full season, 2) he’s never consistently 
                had as much talent around him at his position as he does now and 
                3) so much of his production in previous years has come when the 
                team is trailing that it is hard to discern what he will do if 
                and when the team is more competitive (which it should be this 
                season). Although Shorts isn’t going to get any red boxes 
                on his schedule, it bears mentioning that he’ll have some 
                difficult fantasy matchups because of who his quarterback(s) will 
                be. Most of his yellows would be reds if he was simply going 
                to remain an outside receiver only. Allen Robinson will be 
                Shorts’ direct backup, so if/when Shorts gets hurt, he could 
                be the most valuable receiver on the team. With that said, Lee 
                is the better redraft pick for now and should bring a bit of the 
                big play back to the offense if he is recovered from his college 
                injuries. It should be fairly obvious as No. 2 and 3 options in 
                a run-heavy offense with a below-average quarterback, but neither 
                of the rookies should be trusted as anything more than low-end 
                WR4 this year.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Tennessee Titans |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Avg | NPPR Avg | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | KC | DAL | CIN | IND | CLE | JAC | WAS | HOU | bye | BAL | PIT | PHI | HOU | NYG | NYJ | JAC |   
                        | QB | Jake Locker | 26 | 20 | 20 | 239.7 | 239.7 | 2955 |  | 275 | 240 | 280 | 235 | 275 | 280 | 285 | 210 |  | 245 | 90 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 235 | 305 |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 18 |  | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 3 | 2 |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 12 |  | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |  | 1 | 1 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 1 | 2 |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 255 |  | 20 | 15 | 25 | 20 | 35 | 15 | 30 | 20 |  | 20 | 15 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 15 | 25 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | QB | Charlie Whitehurst | 32 | 13.6 | 13.6 | 54.4 | 54.4 | 860 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 170 | 250 | 215 | 225 |  |  |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |  |  |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |  |  |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 20 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 | 5 | 10 | 5 |  |  |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  |  |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Bishop Sankey | 21 | 15.3 | 12.5 | 229.5 | 187.5 | 1145 |  | 75 | 100 | 80 | 100 | 55 | 105 | 60 | 85 |  | 60 | 85 | 70 | 60 | 70 | 85 | 55 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 310 |  | 20 | 5 | 15 | 50 | 20 | 0 | 50 | 15 |  | 20 | 35 | 15 | 0 | 25 | 10 | 30 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 42 |  | 3 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 3 |  | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Shonn Greene | 29 | 4.9 | 4.3 | 49 | 43 | 220 |  | 20 | 20 | 10 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | 10 | 15 | 25 | 35 | 30 | 15 | 40 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 30 |  | 5 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Dexter McCluster | 26 | 8.6 | 5.2 | 120.5 | 72.5 | 145 |  | 15 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 15 | 10 |  | 20 | INJ | 10 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 10 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 400 |  | 30 | 25 | 15 | 25 | 20 | 40 | 30 | 15 |  | 45 | INJ | 55 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 40 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | INJ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 48 |  | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 |  | 5 | INJ | 5 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 5 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Kendall Wright | 24 | 14.4 | 8.9 | 215.5 | 133.5 | 1035 |  | 65 | 80 | 110 | 65 | 55 | 120 | 60 | 45 |  | 35 | 90 | 75 | 65 | 30 | 80 | 60 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 82 |  | 4 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 5 |  | 3 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 5 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Nate Washington | 31 | 9.7 | 6 | 146 | 90 | 720 |  | 35 | 65 | 45 | 50 | 40 | 65 | 75 | 45 |  | 70 | 45 | 15 | 30 | 55 | 65 | 20 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 56 |  | 3 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 |  | 6 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Justin Hunter | 23 | 11.5 | 8 | 161.5 | 112.5 | 705 |  | 60 | 35 | 50 | 25 | 90 | 30 | INJ | 60 |  | 20 | 70 | 45 | 65 | 25 | 30 | 100 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | INJ | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 49 |  | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 2 | INJ | 4 |  | 2 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 6 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Delanie Walker | 30 | 9.5 | 5.6 | 142.5 | 84.5 | 605 |  | 50 | 30 | 45 | 20 | 50 | 25 | 70 | 30 |  | 55 | 15 | 40 | 25 | 75 | 30 | 45 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 58 |  | 5 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 3 |  | 4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 5 |  |  General overview: If new HC Ken Whisenhunt 
              has shown us anything over the years, it is the ability to adapt 
              his offensive scheme to his personnel. Locker completed 60-plus 
              percent of his passes for the first time in his three-year career 
              in 2013, but continued to be one of the more snake-bitten players 
              at his position and has played in only 18 of 32 games over the last 
              two years due to ailments to his hip, foot and shoulder. Although 
              his skill-set is nearly the opposite of Whisenhunt’s last 
              protégé in Philip Rivers, the new coach – along 
              with OC Jason Michael – are expected to utilize the same short-passing 
              and run-heavy approach that San Diego experienced such great success 
              with last season. The first half of that equation will fall mostly 
              on the shoulders of Wright, who is expected to be this regime’s 
              (smaller but faster) version of Keenan Allen. When Hunter wasn’t 
              either in the doghouse or on the verge of heading there, he showed 
              a knack for taking over the game as a rookie. With nothing but positives 
              coming out of Titans’ camp this year about Hunter, expect 
              a huge second-year leap from him. Walker was also a bit of a revelation 
              in 2013 and should probably expect to make a similar impact this 
              season considering Whisenhunt (a former NFL tight end) just spent 
              a year working with Antonio Gates and Ladarius Green. The second 
              half of the aforementioned pass-run equation will depend on whether 
              Tennessee got its Chris Johnson replacement right with the selection 
              of Sankey. The top runner selected in May’s draft, Sankey 
              brings impressive inside running ability for a back of his size 
              (5-10, 209) to a team that owns one of the better offensive lines 
              in the league. McCluster and Greene will steal some touches, but 
              Sankey is a solid bet for 275-plus touches unless he completely 
              falls on his face in the preseason.
 Matchup 
                analysis: This entire division figures to reap the benefits 
                of trading in the NFC West for the NFC East and perhaps no AFC 
                South coach will have a better understanding of the East than 
                Whisenhunt, who saw the Cowboys, Giants, Eagles and Redskins as 
                a play-caller with the Chargers last season. It won’t be 
                all easy, however, as the Titans inherit the AFC North and face 
                improved defenses in their own division. Still, Sankey has more 
                than enough tools to succeed if Whisenhunt remains as committed 
                to the run as he did with San Diego a season ago. While the rookie 
                doesn’t have any lengthy green-and-white runs on his schedule, 
                he doesn’t have any extended yellow-or-red streaks either. 
                A healthy Greene might change things, but that is unlikely to 
                happen. (McCluster is extremely unlikely to handle significant 
                carries.) Owning a Titan receiver during the fantasy playoffs 
                should be more than boom than bust, which should allow Wright 
                to cap off another fine season in which he’ll square off 
                against very few elite corners and move across the formation enough 
                to generally avoid the ones he does face. Inconsistency still 
                figures to remain a part of Hunter’s game, although outside 
                of Cincinnati (Week 3), Baltimore (Week 10), Pittsburgh (Week 
                11) and the New York Giants (Week 14), there aren’t a lot 
                of teams that have a second – much less a top – cornerback 
                capable of dealing with his athleticism. The same can pretty much 
                be said about Walker and the linebackers/safeties he will attract; 
                the only potentially difficult stretch he should face is during 
                the three weeks following the Titans’ Week 9 bye. IF Locker 
                can stay healthy all season, expend a few struggles in the first 
                half but mostly smooth sailing otherwise; in this offense, he 
                should a more than capable QB2 for fantasy owners in 2014.
 NFC South
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Atlanta Falcons |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Avg | NPPR Avg | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | NO | CIN | TB | MIN | NYG | CHI | BAL | DET | bye | TB | CAR | CLE | ARI | GB | PIT | NO |   
                        | QB | Matt Ryan | 29 | 23.1 | 23.1 | 346.2 | 346.2 | 4280 |  | 270 | 300 | 265 | 290 | 230 | 365 | 235 | 380 |  | 280 | 215 | 310 | 270 | 300 | 300 | 270 |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 31 |  | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 |  | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 13 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 90 |  | 5 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 10 |  | 0 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 10 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Steven Jackson | 31 | 12.2 | 9.9 | 183 | 149 | 850 |  | 65 | 50 | 70 | 60 | 65 | 55 | 45 | 30 |  | 50 | 30 | 75 | 50 | 60 | 75 | 70 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 220 |  | 15 | 15 | 5 | 20 | 10 | 20 | 10 | 0 |  | 15 | 0 | 25 | 35 | 15 | 10 | 25 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 34 |  | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 |  | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Devonta Freeman | 22 | 9.6 | 6.8 | 144 | 102 | 415 |  | 30 | 35 | 20 | 15 | 30 | 20 | 30 | 50 |  | 30 | 25 | 35 | 40 | 15 | 10 | 30 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 365 |  | 20 | 30 | 5 | 35 | 25 | 35 | 10 | 25 |  | 20 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 65 | 10 | 35 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 42 |  | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 |  | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Roddy White | 32 | 17.9 | 11.8 | 268.5 | 176.5 | 1225 |  | 85 | 115 | 75 | 55 | 80 | 115 | 50 | 105 |  | 60 | 80 | 105 | 90 | 55 | 85 | 70 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 9 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 92 |  | 6 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 8 |  | 5 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 5 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Julio Jones | 25 | 19.7 | 13.5 | 295 | 202 | 1360 |  | 90 | 80 | 135 | 105 | 65 | 90 | 75 | 140 |  | 90 | 65 | 75 | 50 | 100 | 120 | 80 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 11 |  | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 93 |  | 6 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 10 |  | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 6 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Harry Douglas | 29 | 10.7 | 6.5 | 160.5 | 97.5 | 735 |  | 50 | 40 | 35 | 50 | 30 | 60 | 85 | 70 |  | 55 | 30 | 65 | 40 | 25 | 60 | 40 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 63 |  | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 7 |  | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Levine Toilolo | 23 | 4 | 2.6 | 60.5 | 38.5 | 205 |  | 0 | 10 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 0 | 20 |  | 40 | 5 | 25 | 5 | 20 | 10 | 10 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 22 |  | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 |  | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |  |  General overview: As much as the retirement 
              of TE Tony Gonzalez frees up White and Jones to post insane numbers, 
              one has to wonder if the offense as a whole will drop off – 
              especially in the red zone. The Falcons will transition into a base 
              set of three receivers with Gonzalez out of the picture and spent 
              the offseason trying to get a little nastier on offense by fortifying 
              the offensive line, which should help the Falcons’ porous 
              run game from a season ago. Gonzalez’s departure – plus 
              the slight shift in base personnel – means Douglas has a chance 
              at the first meaningful playing time of his career that hasn’t 
              come as a result of White or Jones getting hurt. The additions of 
              RG Jon Asamoah in free agency and RT Jake Matthews through the draft 
              should shore up what was, at times, an abysmal right side of the 
              offensive line. As a result, a minor bounce-back season from Jackson 
              cannot be ruled out assuming he can avoid the soft-tissue injuries 
              that have plagued him at various points throughout his career. Atlanta 
              made have secured its future lead back in the fourth round of May’s 
              draft with Freeman, who has done nothing but impress this offseason 
              and is a major improvement over Jacquizz Rodgers. The Florida State 
              alum will almost certainly start out as the third-down and “breather” 
              back for Jackson, but the rookie carries significant upside in that 
              he brings a burst that the veteran just doesn’t have anymore. 
              With the necessary personnel in the passing game to get defenses 
              to play honest, getting Freeman into space will be easier than it 
              will be for most rookie running backs.
 Matchup 
                analysis: Ryan’s job becomes slightly more difficult 
                now without Gonzalez wizardry in the red zone; it is safe to say 
                that Toilolo and Douglas will not make up for the loss of the 
                retired tight end. While Jones and White will attract more attention 
                as a result, they will also be targeted more often out of necessity. 
                The schedule for both players will allow that to happen with more 
                success since only the Saints (Weeks 1 and 16), Giants (Week 5), 
                Cardinals (Week 13) and perhaps the Bears (Week 6) and Ravens 
                (Week 7) have much of a chance to contain one or both of the star 
                receivers. Owners that are able to grab both as their fantasy 
                WR1 and WR2 should be rewarded handsomely, assuming both can avoid 
                the injuries that sabotaged their 2013 campaigns. Even though 
                he’ll see much less action than he did last season, Douglas 
                could make for a decent bye-week WR3 in PPR leagues since only 
                about half of the opponents have capable nickelback options (Saints, 
                Bengals, Giants, Bears, Ravens, Cardinals and Packers). Toilolo 
                should pretty much be a non-factor, but one player that will benefit 
                from Gonzalez’s absence should be Freeman. The rookie will 
                probably be more of a niche player in his first year (suggesting 
                his fantasy value will fluctuate more based on game situations 
                than individual/team matchups), but the need for Ryan to find 
                someone when he gets quick pressure should enable Freeman to push 
                40 receptions if he makes Rodgers an afterthought. Jackson should 
                have a couple of pockets for decent production, although I expect 
                the majority of the second-half slate to be up to the task of 
                slowing him down. Still, Jackson’s work in the passing game 
                plus his touchdown-scoring upside should make him a respectable 
                back-end RB2 option most weeks. Ryan’s season could go south 
                quickly if Jones and/or White get hurt again, but he has a good 
                scheme and more than enough talent (personal as well as team) 
                to work his way through all the yellow, especially if the offensive 
                line makes the kind of improvement it should.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Carolina Panthers |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Avg | NPPR Avg | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | TB | DET | PIT | BAL | CHI | CIN | GB | SEA | NO | PHI | ATL | bye | MIN | NO | TB | CLE |   
                        | QB | Cam Newton | 25 | 22.6 | 22.6 | 338.9 | 338.9 | 3560 |  | 215 | 295 | 160 | 215 | 290 | 180 | 295 | 165 | 260 | 295 | 320 |  | 205 | 210 | 235 | 220 |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 21 |  | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 |  | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 11 |  | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |  | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 565 |  | 35 | 50 | 20 | 40 | 70 | 35 | 40 | 25 | 55 | 30 | 25 |  | 35 | 20 | 40 | 45 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | DeAngelo Williams | 31 | 8.9 | 7.6 | 133.5 | 114.5 | 665 |  | 20 | 40 | 30 | 65 | 25 | 30 | 40 | 75 | 30 | 15 | 35 |  | 105 | 40 | 85 | 30 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 240 |  | 10 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 40 | 5 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 70 |  | 45 | 0 | 5 | 15 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 19 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Jonathan Stewart | 27 | 8.7 | 7.1 | 112.5 | 92.5 | 580 |  | 45 | 50 | 60 | 30 | 65 | 45 | 40 | 30 | 60 | 35 | 40 |  | 50 | 30 | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 165 |  | 10 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 15 | 35 | 20 |  | 5 | 20 | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 20 |  | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 |  | 1 | 2 | INJ | INJ |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Mike Tolbert | 28 | 7.5 | 5.7 | 112 | 85 | 265 |  | 25 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 15 | 15 | 5 | 20 | 15 | 20 |  | 5 | 30 | 25 | 45 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 225 |  | 15 | 20 | 10 | 15 | 30 | 15 | 20 | 15 | 0 | 25 | 10 |  | 10 | 30 | 10 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 27 |  | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 |  | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Kelvin Benjamin | 23 | 12.1 | 8.5 | 182 | 127 | 850 |  | 55 | 85 | 25 | 40 | 35 | 70 | 105 | 10 | 45 | 85 | 110 |  | 30 | 60 | 70 | 25 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 55 |  | 3 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 6 |  | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Jerricho Cotchery | 32 | 10.2 | 6.5 | 152.5 | 97.5 | 675 |  | 35 | 55 | 65 | 40 | 45 | 20 | 50 | 35 | 70 | 40 | 30 |  | 45 | 50 | 60 | 35 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 55 |  | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 2 |  | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Jason Avant | 31 | 2.9 | 1.5 | 44 | 22 | 220 |  | 10 | 20 | 10 | 20 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 20 | 35 | 15 | 35 |  | 10 | 0 | 20 | 15 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 22 |  | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Tavarres King | 24 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 26 | 17 | 110 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 25 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 10 | 0 | 30 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 9 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Greg Olsen | 29 | 12.6 | 7.9 | 189.5 | 118.5 | 825 |  | 70 | 55 | 40 | 55 | 85 | 35 | 70 | 50 | 40 | 65 | 35 |  | 60 | 30 | 50 | 85 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 71 |  | 6 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 |  | 6 | 2 | 4 | 7 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Ed Dickson | 27 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 31.5 | 16.5 | 165 |  | 10 | 20 | 0 | 25 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 0 | 10 |  | 0 | 10 | 20 | 15 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 15 |  | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |  |  General overview: The general consensus 
              for most of the offseason has been the Panthers will have one of 
              the worst wide receiver corps in the league. While that statement 
              may be partially true, it also discounts the possibility the 6-5 
              and 240-pound Benjamin will be a matchup nightmare from the moment 
              he hits the field and the fact that Cotchery has been a more-than-capable 
              second receiver in the league for some time. GM Dave Gettleman knew 
              he was going to have to overhaul the position at some point in the 
              near future with Steve Smith nearing the end and no one else in 
              the pipeline that could overtake Brandon LaFell. The bigger issue 
              is the likelihood that two former college free agents will be manning 
              the tackle spots (LT Nate Chandler and RT Byron Bell) following 
              the retirement of LT Jordan Gross. Chandler and Bell both graded 
              out negatively in 2013 according to Pro Football Focus while projected 
              RG Garry Williams played only 15 snaps last season before tearing 
              his ACL. It’s a lot of unrest up front for a team that wants 
              to run the football as much as the Panthers do. Add to that the 
              age of DeAngelo Williams (31) and injury history of Stewart and 
              there is reason to think Newton – he of the offseason ankle 
              surgery – may have to carry this offense in the same kind 
              of way he did as a rookie in order for the Panthers to repeat last 
              season’s success. Olsen is the one constant besides Newton 
              in this offense and should be as consistently targeted as any of 
              the tight ends in the league not named Jimmy Graham, Gronkowski 
              or Julius Thomas.
 Matchup analysis: 
                Newton’s talent as a runner and a passer is about the only 
                thing holding me back from handing out about five more reds. While 
                I do expect the receivers to perform at least to the level of 
                last year’s group and Newton to be able to match his numbers 
                from a season ago, it is certainly not out of the realm of possibility 
                that he throws for fewer than 250 yards AND one score or less 
                more times than he exceeds those marks. The Panthers have no shortage 
                of teams on their schedule with top-level and/or bigger corners 
                that can make Benjamin work for everything he gets. Since he figures 
                to be raw as a route-runner for at least his first season, the 
                rookie’s biggest impact will probably come as a red-zone 
                specialist that will post the occasional big game because he is 
                essentially being forced into the top receiver role. As his matchup 
                line suggests, his only break might come in the three weeks sandwiching 
                the Panthers’ Week 12 bye. Cotchery should actually end 
                up being the more consistent fantasy receiver in 2014 and proved 
                he was still able to make plays with Pittsburgh last year, turning 
                10 of his 46 catches into touchdowns. Cotchery may get some work 
                in the slot, but there is next-to-no chance that he sniffs double-digit 
                scores again with Olsen and Benjamin around to hog red-zone targets. 
                Olsen’s path to fantasy relevancy isn’t as daunting 
                as Benjamin’s, but it is far from a cakewalk either. Still, 
                the odds are pretty good that the former Bear is going to be targeted 
                as much this year as he was during the second half of 2013 (8.1 
                per game from Week 11 on, with no fewer than six in any of those 
                weeks). September could be brutal for the running game, especially 
                if Pittsburgh (Week 3) returns to form. Even though the path gets 
                a little less bumpy after that, Carolina’s committee approach 
                is going to make selecting the top runner from this backfield 
                about as much fun as reading Bill Belichick’s mind when 
                it comes to his backfield in New England.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | New Orleans Saints |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Avg | NPPR Avg | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | ATL | CLE | MIN | DAL | TB | bye | DET | GB | CAR | SF | CIN | BAL | PIT | CAR | CHI | ATL |   
                        | QB | Drew Brees | 35 | 25.5 | 25.5 | 382 | 382 | 4875 |  | 330 | 285 | 335 | 365 | 365 |  | 345 | 355 | 285 | 300 | 275 | 330 | 275 | 330 | 330 | 370 |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 33 |  | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 |  | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 11 |  | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 50 |  | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |  | 0 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Pierre Thomas | 29 | 12.1 | 7.8 | 181.5 | 116.5 | 475 |  | 35 | 30 | 55 | 45 | 20 |  | 20 | 35 | 10 | 30 | 55 | 30 | 40 | 20 | 15 | 35 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 450 |  | 35 | 25 | 55 | 20 | 20 |  | 45 | 50 | 10 | 40 | 25 | 15 | 25 | 10 | 40 | 35 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 65 |  | 5 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 3 |  | 7 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 5 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Khiry Robinson | 24 | 8.3 | 7.6 | 124 | 114 | 770 |  | 50 | 35 | 70 | 55 | 35 |  | 40 | 70 | 75 | 35 | 65 | 55 | 25 | 35 | 80 | 45 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 70 |  | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |  | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 15 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 10 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Mark Ingram | 24 | 6.7 | 6.2 | 73.5 | 68.5 | 420 |  | 25 | 60 | 20 | 75 | 15 |  | 25 | 10 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | 30 | 55 | 55 | 50 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 25 |  | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 |  | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | 10 | 0 | 0 | 5 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | INJ | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Brandin Cooks | 20 | 12.5 | 8.3 | 187.5 | 124.5 | 125 |  | 10 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 10 | 15 | 0 | 5 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 25 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 880 |  | 50 | 40 | 25 | 80 | 55 |  | 120 | 40 | 40 | 65 | 50 | 30 | 75 | 55 | 65 | 90 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 4 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 63 |  | 3 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 4 |  | 7 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 7 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Marques Colston | 31 | 14 | 9.1 | 210 | 136 | 940 |  | 70 | 55 | 80 | 50 | 60 |  | 60 | 35 | 70 | 55 | 105 | 70 | 60 | 85 | 40 | 45 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 74 |  | 5 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 4 |  | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Kenny Stills | 22 | 10.7 | 7.5 | 161 | 113 | 830 |  | 50 | 35 | 75 | 110 | 35 |  | 15 | 85 | 30 | 70 | 20 | 70 | 30 | 60 | 45 | 100 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 48 |  | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 |  | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Jimmy Graham | 27 | 20.6 | 14.2 | 308.5 | 213.5 | 1355 |  | 85 | 110 | 100 | 75 | 155 |  | 85 | 105 | 75 | 50 | 75 | 100 | 50 | 85 | 125 | 80 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 13 |  | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 95 |  | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 10 |  | 6 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 9 | 5 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Ben Watson | 33 | 3.8 | 2.4 | 57 | 36 | 240 |  | 20 | 15 | 0 | 20 | 25 |  | 20 | 30 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 15 | 20 | 35 | 0 | 15 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 21 |  | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 |  | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |  |  General overview: The Saints say they 
              want to run the ball more seemingly every year. It makes some sense 
              to do so this season with the losses of passing game cogs like Darren 
              Sproles and Lance Moore, but this year’s rushing attack improvement 
              may very well come as a result of the passing game having so many 
              weapons that New Orleans will be able to run out the clock in a 
              lot of fourth quarters. At least for fantasy purposes, Graham is 
              every bit as dominant at tight end as Calvin Johnson is at receiver 
              in Detroit, if not more so. Mot defenses simply do not have a linebacker 
              or safety capable of handling Graham (not every team can use Talib 
              on him as New England did in 2013). Stills should be in for a nice 
              bump in playing time and fantasy numbers with Moore out of the picture, 
              although it seems unlikely the Saints will turn a player who averaged 
              20 yards per catch as a rookie into a chain-mover, so expect him 
              to retain his Devery Henderson-plus role in this offense. HC Sean 
              Payton & Co. raised eyebrows everywhere on draft night when 
              New Orleans traded up for Cooks, who is a plus version of Stills 
              with serious route-running chops. Although he isn’t considered 
              a running back (nor should he be), it has been widely assumed he 
              will fill the void left behind by Sproles. The running game is undergoing 
              a transition of its own, with Robinson working his way into the 
              Saints’ three-man rotation. None of the three (Thomas, Robinson 
              and Ingram) should be expected to be the man at any point of the 
              season barring injury, but Robinson has a chance to nudge Ingram 
              out of the mix if the undrafted free agent continues to impress 
              like he did at the end of last season.
 Matchup analysis: Let’s face 
                it: there aren’t many defenses that warrant a red box against 
                Brees (except maybe the Seahawks in Seattle), so I’m not 
                going to make the case for any. Cleveland (Week 2) and Tampa Bay 
                (Week 4) each offer potential yellows – as do Cincinnati 
                (Week 11) and Pittsburgh (Week 13) – but three of the four 
                games are at home and the one that is not is against a Browns’ 
                secondary that probably won’t be playing up to its high-end 
                potential quite yet. As I tried to reason why Graham won’t 
                be able to match last year’s numbers because of the addition 
                of a player like Cooks, it became clear that he almost has to 
                reach those benchmarks and possibly do more since Cooks and Stills 
                will probably be the ones responsible for picking up the 108 receptions 
                left behind by Moore and Sproles. Unsurprisingly, Graham has a 
                ridiculous amount of green on his schedule and will probably eclipse 
                100 catches for the first time in his career. The Saints’ 
                receivers are a difficult lot to project since Colston and Graham 
                do a lot of their damage from the slot. Cooks is probably going 
                to see plenty of opportunity inside as well, but is just as likely 
                to come out of the backfield a handful of times every game. In 
                short, it makes it almost impossible to slap a red box on any 
                of the key members of the New Orleans’ passing game. As 
                for the running backs, Thomas seems like a good bet to repeat 
                last year’s numbers since he is the best receiver of the 
                bunch and seems locked into about 10 carries per game. Thomas 
                avoids any red boxes given his contributions in the passing game, 
                but Robinson and Ingram obviously aren’t as lucky. Both 
                backs should benefit from the Saints playing with the lead in 
                games – especially before the bye – but they face 
                a difficult stretch that includes Detroit, Carolina (twice), San 
                Francisco and the top three AFC North teams over an eight-week 
                stretch in the second half of the season.
 
                 
                  | 
                       
                        | Tampa Bay Buccaneers |   
                        | Pos | Player | Age | PPR Avg | NPPR Avg | PPR | Non | Totals |  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | CAR | STL | ATL | PIT | NO | BAL | bye | MIN | CLE | ATL | WAS | CHI | CIN | DET | CAR | GB |   
                        | QB | Josh McCown | 35 | 18.4 | 18.4 | 276.2 | 276.2 | 3980 |  | 270 | 290 | 290 | 215 | 280 | 220 |  | 285 | 185 | 305 | 330 | 285 | 250 | 305 | 200 | 270 |   
                        |  | TD |  |  |  |  |  | 21 |  | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 |   
                        |  | INT |  |  |  |  |  | 13 |  | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |   
                        |  | Ru Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 110 |  | 10 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 5 |  | 0 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 10 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Doug Martin | 25 | 13.9 | 11.3 | 208.5 | 169.5 | 1055 |  | 65 | 80 | 45 | 65 | 50 | 60 |  | 70 | 90 | 70 | 110 | 75 | 75 | 60 | 55 | 85 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 6 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 280 |  | 15 | 20 | 35 | 10 | 20 | 5 |  | 15 | 25 | 20 | 10 | 20 | 25 | 35 | 0 | 25 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 39 |  | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 |  | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Charles Sims | 23 | 7.6 | 5.1 | 113.5 | 76.5 | 330 |  | 15 | 20 | 30 | 15 | 25 | 15 |  | 25 | 40 | 25 | 10 | 25 | 20 | 25 | 15 | 25 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 315 |  | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 40 | 10 |  | 25 | 10 | 35 | 45 | 30 | 15 | 10 | 15 | 20 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 37 |  | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 |  | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | RB | Mike James | 23 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 32.5 | 27.5 | 185 |  | 10 | 10 | 20 | 10 | 25 | 10 |  | 15 | 20 | 30 | 5 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 10 |   
                        |  | Ru TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re Yards |  |  |  |  |  | 30 |  | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 5 |  | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 5 |  | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |  | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Vincent Jackson | 31 | 14.9 | 10.1 | 224 | 152 | 1100 |  | 75 | 110 | 85 | 50 | 70 | 40 |  | 85 | 45 | 115 | 105 | 40 | 60 | 90 | 70 | 60 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 72 |  | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 |  | 5 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Mike Evans | 21 | 13.1 | 9 | 196 | 135 | 930 |  | 70 | 55 | 80 | 50 | 30 | 65 |  | 55 | 45 | 85 | 100 | 60 | 65 | 65 | 45 | 60 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 7 |  | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 61 |  | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 4 |  | 4 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Louis Murphy | 27 | 2 | 1.1 | 24.5 | 13.5 | 135 |  | 25 | 0 | 10 | 20 | 20 | 0 |  | 10 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 25 | 0 | 10 | 15 | 0 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 11 |  | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 |  | 1 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Chris Owusu | 24 | 3.9 | 2.6 | 38.5 | 25.5 | 195 |  | 15 | 40 | 20 | 0 | 30 | 15 |  | 25 | INJ | INJ | 25 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 0 | 25 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 1 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | INJ | INJ | 0 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 13 |  | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 |  | 1 | INJ | INJ | 2 | INJ | INJ | INJ | 0 | 1 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | WR | Robert Herron | 22 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 41.5 | 21.5 | 215 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 20 | 10 |  | 0 | 10 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 45 | 40 | 15 | 10 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 20 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 |  | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Austin Seferian-Jenkins | 21 | 5.7 | 3.5 | 85 | 53 | 350 |  | 20 | 30 | 30 | 10 | 0 | 15 |  | 30 | 40 | 20 | 15 | 55 | 25 | 10 | 0 | 50 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 3 |  | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 32 |  | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 |  | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |   
                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   
                        | TE | Tim Wright | 24 | 6.3 | 3.7 | 95 | 55 | 430 |  | 35 | 20 | 10 | 35 | 40 | 55 |  | 35 | 10 | 10 | 30 | 30 | 15 | 45 | 40 | 20 |   
                        |  | Re TD |  |  |  |  |  | 2 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |  | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |   
                        |  | Rec |  |  |  |  |  | 40 |  | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 5 |  | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 2 |  |  General overview: Upon drafting Evans 
              and Seferian-Jenkins, new Bucs GM Jason Licht dubbed his trio (including 
              Jackson) the “Dunkaneers” because each player could 
              easily be mistaken for an undersized power forward on the basketball 
              court (all three of them were actual former standout basketball 
              players in high school and two – Jackson and Seferian-Jenkins 
              – played a bit in college). All three players are at least 
              6-5 and 230 pounds and will provide McCown with familiar size after 
              leaving Chicago, where he went from journeyman quarterback to a 
              veteran signal-caller that posted a 13:1 touchdown-to-interception 
              ratio in about half a season in 2013. So one year after needing 
              to rely on Jackson – and Wright to a much lesser extent – 
              to carry the passing attack, McCown and perhaps Mike Glennon will 
              have more margin for error with their throws than just about any 
              quarterback in the league. The running game, which proved to have 
              plenty of depth last year, added one more talented piece to the 
              puzzle in Sims, who drew plenty of Matt Forte comparisons while 
              in college. Given the number of times new OC Jeff Tedford has stated 
              that he believes in spreading the workload among his backs, it seems 
              pretty certain that Martin will be hard-pressed to come anywhere 
              close to his amazing rookie year – even if his odds of making 
              it through the season increase. Sims can be expected to get his 
              fair share of touches – mostly in the passing game – 
              and push Martin to the back end of fantasy RB1s as a result, something 
              that was probably going to happen anyway once the team released 
              OG Carl Nicks. Although Nicks played in only two games in 2013 (and 
              nine over the last two years), Nicks’ eventual return would 
              have given this ground game such much-needed push. His departure 
              leaves Tampa Bay with one of the weaker interior offensive line 
              units in the league.
 Matchup analysis: Do not take the 
                relative lack of red on Martin’s matchup line as a recommendation 
                to draft him as anything more than a RB2 in fantasy; his natural 
                talent and contributions in the passing game are the only qualities 
                keeping him (or Sims) from about three more reds and three or 
                four more yellows. The schedule isn’t as daunting for them 
                as I am making it sound, but the aforementioned offensive line 
                issues will probably make every Tampa Bay back relatively inconsistent 
                – at least for a team that wants to run the ball as the 
                Bucs say they do. There really isn’t any overly favorable 
                part of the slate per se, although the first five weeks after 
                the bye could give owners a sell-high time if Atlanta’s 
                run defense isn’t as good as I think it will be. McCown 
                did not receive any red boxes, but that was more of a nod to the 
                fact that he has two receivers in Jackson and Evans that should 
                be able to help him avoid any disastrous weeks. Fortunately for 
                him, most of the teams that can bring a quick pass rush – 
                such as Carolina and St. Louis in the first two weeks of the season 
                and the Lions and Panthers in the first two weeks of the fantasy 
                playoffs – lack top-level cornerbacks. The toughest matchups 
                for the receivers are sandwiched around the bye with New Orleans 
                and Baltimore (Weeks 5 and 6) as well as Cleveland (Week 9) possessing 
                enough quality defenders in the secondary to make life difficult 
                for the Bucs’ behemoth receivers. Cincinnati (Week 13) and 
                Green Bay (Week 16) also could provide potential pitfalls if both 
                defenses can stay healthy that long.   Suggestions, comments, about the article or 
                fantasy football in general? E-mail 
                me or follow me on Twitter. 
                
 Doug Orth has written for FF Today 
              since 2006 and appeared in USA Today’s Fantasy Football Preview 
              magazine in 2010 and 2011. He hosted USA Today’s hour-long, 
              pre-kickoff fantasy football internet chat every Sunday this past 
              season. Doug regularly appears as a fantasy football analyst on 
              Sirius XM’s “Fantasy Drive” and for 106.7 The 
              Fan (WJFK – Washington, D.C). He is also a member of the Fantasy 
              Sports Writers Association.
 |