|  
                
  
 A d v e r t i s e m e n t  At the rate players are dropping this preseason, it may be next 
                to impossible to put together any kind of draft board that is 
                relevant for more than a day, much less a week. (Thankfully, I’ll 
                get three shots at this…) Injuries had already claimed Percy 
                Harvin, Jeremy 
                Maclin, Danario 
                Alexander and Dennis 
                Pitta prior to end of last weekend – four players that almost 
                certainly would have found their way inside the top 100 or so 
                players in just about every draft. On Monday, Jamaal 
                Charles gave everyone a scare when he suffered what is being 
                called a “foot strain”. Later that same night, the San Diego Chargers 
                took their second hit at the receiver position in a week when 
                Malcom 
                Floyd got tangled up with CB Shareece Wright in practice. 
                An MRI revealed he sprained his right knee, which is often the 
                initial diagnosis when a player tears his ACL. While Floyd’s potential 
                season-ending injury doesn’t mean much to the average fantasy 
                owner, any potential long-term injury to Charles sure does. The 
                point is that days like Monday serve as a reminder the NFL’s news 
                cycle rarely ever stops, which illustrates the importance of owners 
                using tools such as Twitter during a draft to ensure they are 
                as informed as every other owner in the draft room.  I offer my sympathies to any and all owners that have already 
                participated in drafts in which they drafted one or more of the 
                aforementioned players, but avoiding the first wave of injuries 
                and gaining clarity on position battles are the main reasons why 
                it is smart to wait at least another week or two to draft. My 
                first draft of consequence takes place on Thursday when I participate 
                in an experts’ auction draft, but I’ve always felt 
                it is at least one week too early every season. With that said, 
                I will not complain about free “practice” against 
                industry experts at any point of the preseason using the method 
                of drafting I will be utilizing for some of my big money leagues. 
                It’s another advantage I’ll have over the rest of 
                my competition in a couple of weeks and, just as importantly, 
                I have a title to defend. Loyal readers already know my stance on the importance of value 
                when it comes to drafting, but most fantasy analysts fail to quantify 
                it. As it relates to my Big Boards, I define "value" 
                using the VORP (Value Over Replacement Player) concept for a two-RB, 
                three-WR league, which essentially allows me to compare apples 
                and oranges. At QB and TE, the value reflects the standard deviation 
                from the 12th-ranked player at the position – the last starting-caliber 
                player at the position. At RB, the value reflects the standard 
                deviation from the 24th-ranked player at the position and, at 
                WR, the 36th-ranked player. As I have mentioned many times before 
                over the years, "value" in drafting is key. Need has 
                to outweigh value on occasion, but for the most part, it can't 
                hurt to take the best player left on the board. Understanding 
                the delicate balance of realizing a player is too good to pass 
                up and knowing exactly when the last spot in your likely Week 
                1 starting lineup needs to be filled often separates the great 
                drafters from the very good ones. Beyond using “value” to ease the process of setting 
                up a draft board, analyzing the playoff matchups and common sense 
                has to enter into the conversation as well. A perfect example 
                of the latter is Calvin Johnson, whose PPR value should make him 
                the top player on my board. While Johnson certainly brings a huge 
                advantage to his fantasy teams almost every week, no number cannot 
                account for the economic principle of “opportunity cost” 
                – the loss of potential gain from other alternatives when 
                one alternative is chosen – in real-time when owners pass 
                on an elite running back to draft Johnson. A simple number value 
                also cannot account for the drastic falloff in value at running 
                back after the established top options are drafted, usually by 
                the end of the first round. Smart drafting also involves supply 
                versus demand. Every year, there are not nearly enough quality 
                running backs to occupy 24 starting spots in 12-team leagues, 
                but there are usually at least 36 receivers that are worthy starters.
 Before I get to the boards, I would like to remind readers about 
                a few key points about the Big Boards: 
 1) They are not going to look like many other draft boards you 
                see. My method of evaluating fantasy players relies heavily on 
                projected consistency and matchups, not overall fantasy point 
                total projections. All too often, fantasy owners and even the 
                so-called "experts" get hung up by the final numbers. 
                Don't get me wrong, I want all my players to have 300+ points 
                at the end of the season. But as the old saying goes, "It's 
                not about the destination, it's about the journey"; if my 
                RB1 gives me seven spectacular performances along with six duds 
                during the regular season, there's a fairly decent chance I may 
                end up 7-6. I don’t want that and neither should you.
 
 2) I will push a player down my 
                board if feel he is a health risk or if I simply don’t/can’t 
                trust him. I will put more stock into this area 
                in 2013 than I ever have. If you take the time to break down 
                each position I provide below, you will notice that I don’t 
                follow the point totals or averages to a tee. (Think of the average 
                and value I provide for each player as a starting point for my 
                rankings.) Outside of trust issues, I will push a player down 
                my board – despite a higher average or overall point total 
                – if I believe he will simply be less consistent throughout 
                the season or if his playoff schedule appears treacherous.
 
 3) Much like last season, I want to provide readers with a clear 
                risk sign. If a player is a moderate risk – be it due to 
                holdout, injury, off-field, etc. – you will see a
  next his name. If I feel a player is a severe risk, your will 
                see a  next to his name. While I feel like I have accounted for each 
                player’s “risk” with their spot on the Big Board, 
                you may be more or less inclined to deal with that risk than I 
                am. This is just another way of helping you take a look at the 
                board and quickly identifying which players stand a good chance 
                to frustrate you at some point this season. 
 Note: At least 
                for this first set of Big Boards, I have chosen to stop at 150 
                players. Next week, I will add the kickers and defenses while 
                also expanding the number of ranked players. In the final set 
                of Big Boards in two weeks, I will add even more players.
 
 Let’s revisit the color-coding system before we start:
 
 Red – A very difficult matchup. 
                For lower-level players, a red matchup means they should not be 
                used in fantasy that week. For a second- or third-tier player, 
                drop your expectations for them at least one grade that week (i.e. 
                from WR2 to WR3). For elite players, expect them to perform one 
                level lower than their usual status (i.e. RB1 performs like a 
                RB2).
 Yellow – Keep expectations 
                fairly low in this matchup. For lower-level players, a yellow 
                matchup is a borderline start at best. For a second- or third-tier 
                player, they can probably overcome the matchup if things fall 
                right. For the elite players, expect slightly better than average 
                production. White – Basically, this matchup 
                is one that could go either way. In some cases, I just don’t 
                feel like I have a good feel yet for this defense. Generally speaking, 
                these matchups are winnable matchups for all levels of players. Green – It doesn’t 
                get much better than this. For non-elite players, the stage is 
                basically set for said player to exploit the matchup. For the 
                elite player, this matchup should produce special numbers..Key: OVR – Overall Rank
 PR – Position Rank
 FPts – Fantasy points scored
 FPts/ G – Fantasy points/game
 Value - Read *** below
 
 ***In addition to discussing value above, there is one other note 
              regarding the numbers in the “value” column: numbers 
              that are bolded reflect positive values while the italicized numbers 
              are essentially negative. (For the more statistically-inclined, 
              the former values are on the right side of the bell curve while 
              the latter values are on the left side.)
 Here is the scoring 
                system that I used to rank the players in the Non-PPR format: 
                
 One final note: Over the next 
                week, I will be “quality controlling” my projections 
                (basically double-checking my numbers, such as not having one 
                defense projected to intercept 40 passes while another has just 
                five), so this week’s Big Boards may look dramatically different 
                – particularly at the bottom – in two weeks than they 
                currently do. As with all things that are worth doing, this process 
                takes time and needs to be constantly revised as more information 
                about depth charts and injuries becomes available. What I can 
                assure you is that my final set of Big Boards will be one of the 
                most comprehensive draft-day tools anyone will have at their disposal.
   Top 25: Foster’s continued 
              absence is slightly concerning at this point, but owners need to 
              remember that it is hardly fair to suggest Foster is on the verge 
              of breaking down and Peterson is “safe” simply because 
              he is a freak of nature. No one should dismiss Foster’s potential 
              for injury after three heavy-workload seasons, but he appeared to 
              be in prime form during the playoffs against two top-12 rush defenses 
              despite a career high in carries, a poor right side of the offensive 
              line and limited help from the passing game. Peterson is almost 
              1 1/2 years older and has 754 more regular-season touches than Foster, 
              so the physical-freak argument should only carry so much weight. 
              With that said, they are both special players and that is why they 
              are included in the top five.
 Although Morris and Lynch could each challenge for the league 
                lead in rushing touchdowns again, their lack of involvement in 
                the passing game makes them slightly less consistent than most 
                of their higher-rated contemporaries. Owners will likely question 
                Graham’s inclusion in the top 15, but his value actually 
                suggests he could/should go higher. The fourth-year tight end 
                is essentially a receiver at a position in which there are no 
                other healthy elite options. Given the depth at receiver and quarterback, 
                owners should view Graham as the second-best fantasy receiver 
                – in regards to the value he brings to a team. As such, 
                he is a savvy second-round pick for those owners who feel the 
                quality of running backs are not any greater in the second round 
                than they are in the third or early fourth. No other player in 
                fantasy offers more of an advantage at his position each week 
                than Graham. 26-50: In my opinion, four 
                of the seven backs I have clustered from 29-42 are almost impossible 
                to rank. Gore has arguably the best run-blocking line in the league 
                in front of him and a team that is very committed to the rushing 
                attack, but he is 30 and could be given the Michael Turner “treatment” 
                (as in he will be saved for the second half of the season). Jones-Drew 
                is the one player of the bunch I want to rank higher, but I’ll 
                play it safe with him for now until I actually see him run again. 
                Of the backs in this group, MJD is the only one that I feel calling 
                a second-round value if he truly is as healthy as he is letting 
                on publicly. McFadden clearly has the highest upside if he plays 
                16 games, but we all know by now that has little chance of happening. 
                He doesn’t have much of a supporting cast either, which 
                makes it a situation I will try to avoid unless I can land him 
                as a flex option. Wilson could easily be the next Chris Johnson 
                (in terms of his ability to break off big runs routinely), but 
                I have long had issues with choosing running backs that don’t 
                pass block well or get goal-line carries. Unfortunately for the 
                second-year back, both areas are working against him at the moment. Murray could have easily been included in the above group, but 
                I find myself less concerned about him than the other backs. Although 
                the offensive line will continue to be a work in progress, his 
                present and future owners have to be pleased with the Cowboys’ 
                renewed emphasis on the rushing attack in the preseason. Although 
                his 50-60 catch potential doesn’t mean as much in standard 
                leagues, it doesn’t take away the extra 300-500 receiving 
                yards he can collect as a result. Murray is an upright runner 
                who will probably always be more susceptible to injury than most 
                backs, but more outside and zone runs (such as the ones I have 
                seen through the team’s two exhibition games) could go a 
                long way in lessening the number of times he has to take a direct 
                shot from a linebacker in the hole. His injury history makes him 
                a RB2 in fantasy, but he has top-10 RB upside if 2013 is the season 
                he plays all 16 games. Savvy owners need to remember Lance Dunbar, 
                who has looked very good thus far and could be close to solidifying 
                his status as Murray’s handcuff.  51-100: Few teams are playing 
                the misinformation game in the backfield better than Green Bay 
                this summer. HC Mike McCarthy stated last week he was happy to 
                see DuJuan Harris return to practice because he still viewed Harris 
                as the starter. James Starks started the preseason opener and 
                is reportedly having an “outstanding” camp. Johnathan 
                Franklin either is the clear-cut passing-down back or he’s 
                not, depending on the source. Alex Green handled first-team snaps 
                at one point last week, only to hear he is the subject of trade 
                talks a few days later. And then there is Lacy, who was drafted 
                to be the physical presence this offense needs. IF Lacy gets the 
                same kind of workload Ryan Grant did in his heyday and IF he can 
                stay healthy (two huge question marks), then Lacy is probably 
                a second-round value with double-digit touchdown potential. However, 
                it should come as no big mystery why he is ranked as a fifth-round 
                value here – he’s currently nursing a hamstring injury 
                and is unlikely to receive a lot of work in the passing game. I’ll devote the rest of this section to two players that 
                have a shot to skyrocket up both boards in the coming weeks: DeSean 
                Jackson and DeAngelo Williams. When I initially did the Eagles’ 
                projections, Nick Foles seemed to be in line for the starting 
                quarterback job and Jeremy Maclin was still healthy. Now, Michael 
                Vick looks to have the edge as the signal-caller, the receiver 
                corps has been decimated and Jackson appears reinvigorated. Projecting 
                Jackson will be much easier once Philadelphia makes a call at 
                quarterback, but it’s not hard to imagine a scenario in 
                which the Eagles’ top receiver – with a clear mind 
                – revisits the same kind of fantasy value he enjoyed in 
                2008 and 2009 as the team’s only established threat at receiver. 
                Williams is in a similar boat from the standpoint he is in position 
                to take advantage of a fallen teammate. Stewart is still a question 
                mark with little information as to when he will return after undergoing 
                offseason surgery on both ankles. Stewart is the more-talented 
                back, but real-life battles aren’t always determined by 
                natural ability. Carolina looks to be serious about re-establishing 
                the run while reducing the amount of the ground game Newton has 
                to carry himself. In short, if Stewart isn’t around, there’s 
                a very good chance Williams could establish sneaky RB3 value in 
                his absence. 101-150: Ballard isn’t 
                a special player by any stretch, but he doesn’t get near 
                enough credit. While Luck was generating headlines with his stellar 
                play in 2012, Ballard was averaging 4.1 YPC over the second half 
                of the season behind a below-average run-blocking line on a team 
                that wasn’t committed to running the ball. The addition 
                of Bradshaw certainly curbs any immediate upside he brought to 
                the new offense – which is emphasizing the rushing attack 
                – but owners have to know that chronic foot injuries are 
                among the worst injuries a running back can have – making 
                the ex-Giant a severe risk. Few players have more variance between 
                their fantasy ceiling and floor than Ballard in 2013, with his 
                downside being about 500 rushing yards in a strict backup role 
                and his upside over 1,000 yards. The likelihood, however, is that 
                Bradshaw will be kept on a 12-15 touch/game count, making both 
                players fantasy RB3s. Ballard will likely be a viable low-end 
                RB2 in the 2-4 games Bradshaw will probably miss, which is enough 
                to make him a solid fantasy RB4 option. Two players I will almost certainly draft on at least half of 
                my teams are Randle and Harvin. While Randle appears to have his 
                path blocked by Nicks and Cruz, the former’s susceptibility to 
                injury is no secret. Randle is not a player owners should draft 
                as a player that should contribute to fantasy teams immediately, 
                but rather as an investment that can pay off in a big way as a 
                fantasy starter or trade bait if Nicks misses a handful of games 
                again this season. Harvin appears to be a longshot at best given 
                his initial 11-16 week timetable following hip surgery, but consider 
                him a long-term investment – especially in leagues that have an 
                IR spot. If Harvin can begin practice around Thanksgiving – which 
                would be on the long end of his projected recovery – then he is 
                a player that could be a huge asset just in time for the fantasy 
                playoffs. The very reason he is ranked as the 49th receiver is 
                because he makes the perfect WR5. If that sounds crazy, consider 
                how many players ranked below him – at any position – could have 
                the same kind of potential impact he should have during the fantasy 
                postseason.
 Next: PPR 
                Big Board
   
 Suggestions, comments, about the article or 
                fantasy football in general? E-mail 
                me or follow me on Twitter. 
                
 Doug Orth has written for FF Today 
              since 2006 and appeared in USA Today’s Fantasy Football Preview 
              magazine in 2010 and 2011. He hosted USA Today’s hour-long, 
              pre-kickoff fantasy football internet chat every Sunday this past 
              season. Doug regularly appears as a fantasy football analyst on 
              Sirius XM’s “Fantasy Drive” and for 106.7 The 
              Fan (WJFK – Washington, D.C). He is also a member of the Fantasy 
              Sports Writers Association.
 |