Well, we’re movin’ on up
To the east side
To a deluxe apartment in the sky…
- Ja'net Dubois and Jeff Barry (co-writers for the theme song
of The Jeffersons)
For the younger members of my audience, the above lyrics may
not be all that familiar to you. For all of those readers around
40 years of age, The Jeffersons was a staple in the entertainment
lineup of many Americans from 1975-1985 and one of the longest
running sitcoms in the history of American television. (Ah, don’t
we all remember the days when TV Guide was just a magazine?)
The
reason I chose “Movin’ on Up” to lead into this
week’s article is because that is exactly what I am trying
to do with this week’s submissions.The
Fantasy Championship and FFPC
offer the biggest payouts in fantasy football, so it is about
time that I start creating some Big Boards that not only cater
to those contests, but also recognize the difference between the
scoring in those leagues and the more traditional formats I have
been focused on for the last few years. I know of several high-stakes
players that have used the traditional Big Boards I have built
in the past with great success, so it only makes sense to make
a few alterations on my end in order to make sure those owners
have the same kind of resource that many of you have utilized.
The TFC and FFPC use scoring that is very similar to the PPR
scoring I used in last
week’s Big Boards. The main differences are as follows:
1) the TFC rewards four points (instead of six) for passing touchdowns,
penalizes one point (instead of two) for interceptions and hands
out a point for every 20 yards passing (instead of 25).
2) the FFPC uses the same scoring as I just laid out for the TFC,
but rewards tight ends 1.5 points for every catch and one point
for every other position.
Needless to say, there isn’t going to be much difference
between the Big Boards this week, outside of the fact that tight
ends will appear much earlier and slightly more often in the FFPC
Big Board. I realize that 150 players probably won’t be
enough for you this week (both sites use a 20-round draft) and
I apologize for that. Fear not, however, as next week’s
200-player Big Boards should be deep enough for the majority of
you. (And honestly, shouldn’t most of us be drafting our
most important teams next week anyway?)
Before I get to the boards, I would like to remind readers about
two key points:
1) I doubt you will find another draft board like this one and
further doubt you will find a similar set of rankings anywhere
else. The standard the industry uses to measure accuracy among
analysts is overall scoring, but I am more concerned with projected
consistency and matchups. Consistency tends to lead to big fantasy
numbers at the end of the season and championships while inconsistency
and bad matchups at the wrong time usually lead to frustration.
Someday, I hope the industry catches on to my way of thinking.
Until then, I’ll try to win as many titles as possible and
help you do the same.
2 ) Much like the past three seasons, I want to provide readers
with a clear risk sign. If a player is a moderate risk –
be it due to injury, off-field, etc. – you will see a
next his name. If I feel a player is a severe risk, you will see
a
next to his name. While I feel like I have accounted for each
player’s “risk” with their spot on the Big Board,
you may be more or less inclined to deal with that risk than I
am. This is just another way of helping you take a look at the
board and quickly identifying which players stand a good chance
to frustrate you at some point this season.
Let’s revisit the color-coding system before we start:
Red – A very difficult matchup.
For lower-level players, a red matchup means they should not be
used in fantasy that week. For a second- or third-tier player,
drop your expectations for them at least one grade that week (i.e.
from WR2 to WR3). For elite players, expect them to perform one
level lower than their usual status (i.e. RB1 performs like a
RB2).
Yellow – Keep expectations
fairly low in this matchup. For lower-level players, a yellow
matchup is a borderline start at best. For a second- or third-tier
player, they can probably overcome the matchup if things fall
right. For the elite players, expect slightly better than average
production.
White – Basically, this matchup
is one that could go either way. In some cases, I just don’t
feel like I have a good feel yet for this defense. Generally speaking,
these matchups are winnable matchups for all levels of players.
Green – It doesn’t
get much better than this. For non-elite players, the stage is
basically set for said player to exploit the matchup. For the
elite player, this matchup should produce special numbers..
Key:
OVR – Overall Rank
PR – Position Rank
FPts – Fantasy points scored
FPts/ G – Fantasy points/game
Success score (SSI) – The sum of several position-specific
attributes that I feel are important to fantasy production, weighted
and scored. A perfect score is 1000, but it may help to move the
decimal point one spot to the left and think of each score as a
percentage. It may also help to think of the final score as the
likelihood that player will produce at the level I have projected
him if his current environment stays roughly the same as it is now.
Just so you know what you are getting yourself into, here are some
of the attributes I weighed and scored at each position:
Quarterback – Talent,
job security, four-game stat projection, red-zone projection (how
often I believe the quarterback will either throw or run the ball
himself inside the 20) and the degree to which I believe his offense
is conservative or will play that way because of an elite defense.
Running back – Talent,
job security, durability, four-game stat projection, three-down
back (based on projected snaps) and the run-blocking prowess of
his offensive line.
Wide receiver – Talent,
job security, four-game stat projection and projected red-zone
scores.
Tight end – Talent, job
security, projected red-zone scores and projected targets in relation
to his peers at the position.
Here is the scoring
system that I used to rank the players in the PPR format:
One of the most common mistakes drafters make is attaching
a label to one player while often disregarding the fact his peers
at the same position have the same issue. If you don’t buy into
C.J.
Anderson as an early first-round pick, I can completely understand
that decision since he is less proven than the other top backs behind
him on my board. Here’s the problem: the Chiefs want to rest Jamaal
Charles more this season (Knile
Davis is a more-than-capable reserve), the Packers have already
talked about keeping Eddie
Lacy fresh by limiting his touches (they did this last season
by liberally using James
Starks) and we already know Jeremy
Hill will miss out on a productive fantasy day or two when Giovani
Bernard steals some work in the passing game. I take some degree
of comfort in remembering how new HC Gary Kubiak handled his backfield
with the Texans in 2011, when Arian
Foster finished as the RB4 and Ben
Tate the RB32 in PPR. (For what it is worth, Tate piled up 188
touches and Foster missed three games that year!) My advice: take
advantage of the uncertainty surrounding Anderson right now and
get him at a discount. Just make sure to spend an early mid-round
pick (maybe in the 10th-round area in 12-team leagues) on Ronnie
Hillman. If you do so, there is a strong chance you have landed
a RB1 and part-time flex option.
Randall
Cobb’s upside – especially in PPR leagues – was already pretty
high and it’s hard seeing him better his 2014 numbers since he
posted a 91-1,287-12 line WITH Jordy
Nelson operating as Aaron
Rodgers’ favorite target. The crushing loss of Nelson to an
ACL tear over the weekend probably pushes Cobb over the 100-catch
mark, but the Packers are not hurting for options even with their
top receiver sidelined. I think the safe assumption is that if
Cobb plays all 16 games, he is a very good bet to match last year’s
production but not necessarily blow it out of the water. For what
it is worth, I had projected Cobb on a 108-catch pace prior to
Nelson’s injury and I think that is about where he will end up
since Rodgers will also pepper Lacy, Davante
Adams as well as Richard
Rodgers, Jeff
Janis and rookie Ty
Montgomery with targets to fill the void left behind.
26-50:
Most of the running backs in this group of 25 players have
a healthy mix of positive qualities that could thrust them into
the top 10-12 at their position and enough potential pitfalls
to make owners question a third- or fourth-round investment in
them. One of the toughest ones to rank has to be Alfred
Morris, who saw his team add one of the league’s best offensive
line coaches (Bill Callahan) and a team-wide commitment to run
the ball more often in his contract year. So what’s the problem?
“Alf” might as well be the lower-scoring, present-day version
of Michael Turner in that he is going to play all 16 games, run
for 1,000 yards and eight or so touchdowns and do next to nothing
in the passing game. The bigger issue, however, could be that
his likely replacement (Morris is in a contract year and the team
drafted Matt
Jones) is bigger, stronger, faster and can do more than hold
his own as a receiver out of the backfield. Morris’ YPC has declined
each year since his incredible rookie season in 2012, so it is
fair to wonder just how strong of a grip Morris has on his job.
The fourth-year runner has been a safe RB2 over the last two seasons
because he’s been a lock for at least 250 carries, but I’m not
sure that is going to be the case again in 2015.
51-100:
If Jameis Winston can bring any kind of respectability to the
Tampa Bay offense, then Doug Martin’s owners may finally
be able to get a taste of what it was like to own the “Muscle
Hamster” as a rookie in 2012. No, I don’t expect Martin
to come anywhere close to 1,972 total yards or 12 touchdowns simply
because the Bucs aren’t going to give him the ball 368 times
like former HC Greg Schiano did. What Martin can do if he stays
healthy for 16 games is approach 225-250 carries and roughly 25
catches simply because I cannot foresee a scenario in which Tampa
Bay opens up the offense for its rookie quarterback in 2015. Charles
Sims figures to cap Martin’s upside in the passing game
again, so owners need to set their sights on a low-end RB2 if
they draft the fourth-year back.
I have a feeling I will end up with Tyler Eifert on roughly half
of my money-league teams this year. Consider for a second that
Cincinnati found a way to funnel 80 targets (resulting in a 62-460-5
line) to Jermaine Gresham last season, albeit in a season in which
the Bengals couldn’t keep any receiving option healthy for
more than a few games at a time. Before succumbing to a rash of
injuries over his first two NFL seasons, Eifert came into the
league as a very athletic tight end with exceptional high-point
ability for a player at his position. It is important to note
we aren’t talking about a Rob Gronkowski-, Jimmy Graham-
or Travis Kelce-like skill set here, but a player of his abilities
that has an elite receiver like A.J. Green and a very good ground
game taking defensive attention away from him is set up for fantasy
success. Eifert’s ADP (according to Fantasy Football Calculator)
has climbed nearly a full round in the last week alone to the
middle of the ninth round, but that price is still nearly two
rounds lower than I think he should go. Whereas I think Vernon
Davis can have a bounce-back season and believe Kyle Rudolph could
be a mid-level TE1 if he could ever stay healthy, I tend to believe
Eifert will push both and make a solid charge at finishing among
the top 5-8 players at his position in fantasy.
I’m going to keep expectations in check in regards to Devin
Funchess replacing Kelvin
Benjamin, perhaps in part because I expect Greg
Olsen to benefit the most from a fantasy perspective. Having
said that, Cam
Newton displayed an affinity for throwing the fade to Benjamin
in the red zone and take his chances the 6-5 receiver would consistently
win the battle against a smallish corner last year. While I don’t
think the 6-5 Funchess can match Benjamin in terms of his impact
outside the 20, I do think he has a solid chance to rival his
production inside the red zone. The Panthers have quickly gone
from a team that appeared to be on the verge of competing for
a third straight NFC South title to an outfit with an inefficient
quarterback that could very well be without Benjamin and C Ryan
Kalil (sprained knee, questionable for Week 1), who is the one
established blocker the team had, and lacks legitimate receiving
options outside of Olsen and Funchess.
101-150:
It is about time for owners to start getting on board with the
Vikings’ offense. All Teddy Bridgewater has done in three
exhibition games is complete 78.6 percent of his passes and avoid
sacks. Once Charles Johnson established himself as a go-to receiver
for Bridgewater around Week 11 last season, the then-rookie quarterback
proceeded to complete 68.2 percent of his attempts for 228.3 yards
per game and 11 touchdowns. Considering Bridgewater and Johnson
were both first-year players and the Vikings had an average-at-best
ground game, those numbers are pretty good. This year, Minnesota
is flush with offensive talent as Mike Wallace, a healthy Kyle
Rudolph, a highly-motivated Adrian Peterson and even versatile
rookie TE MyCole Pruitt are along for the ride. I think 25-plus
touchdown throws is a completely realistic goal for him, assuming
Peterson doesn’t become the first back in league history
to top 2,000 rushing yards twice.
I desperately want to see Brian Quick play this weekend. Cleared
for contact after about 10 months after sustaining a shoulder
injury in Week 8 last season, the No. 33 overall pick of the 2012
draft only needs to prove to me he can take a few hits in order
to move up my boards. Quick was on a 64-973-8 pace despite the
Rams’ lackluster quarterback play last season, so there
is reason to believe he can emerge as a trustworthy every-week
WR3 with a more stable situation under center. I’d be remiss
if I didn’t include a plug in this section for teammate
Tavon Austin, who I tend to believe is going to be very fantasy-relevant
at some point early in the season (at least as much as any potential
No. 2 receiver in a run-heavy offense can). I can assure you he
will be a regular on next week’s boards; I think Austin
makes a great end-of-the-draft flyer pick in the 20-round formats
of The Fantasy Championship and the FFPC.
Doug Orth has written for FF
Today since 2006 and been featured in USA Today’s Fantasy
Football Preview magazine since 2010. He hosted USA Today’s
hour-long, pre-kickoff fantasy football internet chat every Sunday
in 2012-13 and appears as a guest analyst on a number of national
sports radio shows, including Sirius XM’s “Fantasy Drive”.
Doug is also a member of the Fantasy Sports Writers Association.