Five Big Boards in five days. No one to my knowledge as ever
tried to accomplish such a feat. Perhaps after doing it this year,
maybe I’ll wish I hadn’t.
All kidding aside, we are on the back stretch of the preseason
and the most serious fantasy owners will almost certainly use
the next week-plus to cram anywhere from five to 40 or so drafts
into a 10-day window. The inevitable major preseason injuries
have happened, providing significant boosts to the fantasy stocks
of a mid-round player like Davante Adams or a late-round flyer
like rookie Devin Funchess. We know as much as we are going to
know until the season starts (at least until the next news blurb
we read from a beat writer throws into question everything we
thought we knew about the team they cover).
While I will provide the bulk of my analysis this week into this
article, I will add any insights that I think are particularly
helpful to owners in standard, half-point, TFC and FFPC leagues
in those respective Big Boards as the week progresses.
Before I get to the boards, I would like to remind readers about
two key points:
1) I doubt you will find another draft board like this one and
further doubt you will find a similar set of rankings anywhere
else. The standard the industry uses to measure accuracy among
analysts is overall scoring, but I am more concerned with projected
consistency and matchups. Consistency tends to lead to big fantasy
numbers at the end of the season and championships while inconsistency
and bad matchups at the wrong time usually lead to frustration.
Someday, I hope the industry catches on to my way of thinking.
Until then, I’ll try to win as many titles as possible and
help you do the same.
2 ) Much like the past three seasons, I want to provide readers
with a clear risk sign. If a player is a moderate risk –
be it due to injury, off-field, etc. – you will see a
next his name. If I feel a player is a severe risk, you will see
a
next to his name. While I feel like I have accounted for each
player’s “risk” with their spot on the Big Board,
you may be more or less inclined to deal with that risk than I
am. This is just another way of helping you take a look at the
board and quickly identifying which players stand a good chance
to frustrate you at some point this season.
As I have done in previous years, I have taken the additional
step on the final set of Big Boards to designate players to their
“fantasy position”. Keep in mind that just because
there may be 12 teams in your league, it doesn’t mean there
are 12 players worthy of being designated as a QB1, RB1, WR1 or
TE1.
QB1/RB1/WR1/TE1 – A player
I am comfortable starting every week, regardless of matchup.
1/2, 2/3, 3/4 (All positions) –
A player that can occasionally post numbers with a player in the
tier above him, but is usually either too inconsistent to be considered
in that tier or has a poor track record of staying healthy.
QB2/TE2 – A bye-week or matchup-based
quarterback or tight end.
RB2/WR2 – A back or receiver
that can post RB1/WR1 numbers with high upside, but has an obvious
flaw that makes him less consistent than a RB1 or WR1.
RB3/WR3 - Usually is an inconsistent
“splash” player that can win his fantasy team with
a huge performance, but is best utilized when the matchup is right.
RB4/WR4 – Usually a steady,
lower-upside option that can be spot-started and used as a bye-week
fill-in. In some cases, he is a high-upside player blocked by
two top-level players in front of him.
RB5/WR5 – Usually a “handcuff”,
but a player who is on the roster generally to keep the ship from
sinking due to injury.
RB6/WR6 – Extreme longshots
due to any number of factors, but with enough talent to be viable
at some point in fantasy.
I have taken the additional step this year of adding color to
the “Pos” column below; it is my hope taking this
step will further enhance an owner’s ability to delineate
where one tier ends (regardless of position) and where another
one begins, essentially using the same concept NFL teams do with
a horizontal board during the NFL Draft. (Although it is not a
perfect example, here
is the kind of thing I am talking about in case the term “horizontal
board” is unfamiliar to you.) The change of colors from
blue to white don’t necessarily represent rounds here, but
tiers.
Let’s revisit the color-coding system before we start:
Red – A very difficult matchup.
For lower-level players, a red matchup means they should not be
used in fantasy that week. For a second- or third-tier player,
drop your expectations for them at least one grade that week (i.e.
from WR2 to WR3). For elite players, expect them to perform one
level lower than their usual status (i.e. RB1 performs like a
RB2).
Yellow – Keep expectations
fairly low in this matchup. For lower-level players, a yellow
matchup is a borderline start at best. For a second- or third-tier
player, they can probably overcome the matchup if things fall
right. For the elite players, expect slightly better than average
production.
White – Basically, this matchup
is one that could go either way. In some cases, I just don’t
feel like I have a good feel yet for this defense. Generally speaking,
these matchups are winnable matchups for all levels of players.
Green – It doesn’t
get much better than this. For non-elite players, the stage is
basically set for said player to exploit the matchup. For the
elite player, this matchup should produce special numbers..
Key:
OVR – Overall Rank
PR – Position Rank
FPts – Fantasy points scored
FPts/ G – Fantasy points/game
Success score (SSI) – The sum of several position-specific
attributes that I feel are important to fantasy production, weighted
and scored. A perfect score is 1000, but it may help to move the
decimal point one spot to the left and think of each score as a
percentage. It may also help to think of the final score as the
likelihood that player will produce at the level I have projected
him if his current environment stays roughly the same as it is now.
Here is the scoring
system that I used to rank the players in the PPR format:
In any given year, there are roughly 15 players I consider
as fantasy blue-chippers. As is the case in college recruiting,
just because a player is designated as a five-star athlete, it does
not guarantee superstardom. That is pretty much the case in fantasy
football as well. This year, I’m going to say there are almost
17. What does that mean? (I’m glad you asked.) I think the
first 15 on my board above are generally recognized as the top 15
by most, although perhaps in a different order than many have them.
The 16th player is Andrew Luck, whose only potential “fantasy
weakness” at this point seems to be a front office that doesn’t
appear all that inclined to make sure their franchise quarterback
has the best protection money can buy. I don’t think any of
us question that Luck is a near-lock to produce at a top-three level
at his position, so long as he just stays healthy. The reason he
ranks at the bottom of the blue-chip category is because he plays
at a position that has more viable starting options than most 12-team
leagues have starting vacancies.
The “almost” represents Justin Forsett, who I am
starting to embrace again as a surefire fantasy RB1. Earlier this
offseason, it seemed logical that the 29-year-old journeyman (30
in October) would be a near-lock for RB1 status as the latest
player to benefit from all the receptions that backs usually get
in a Marc Trestman offense. Then, I saw Lorenzo Taliaferro shed
weight and play very well this preseason. Then, I saw Taliaferro
get hurt (MCL sprain). An improved Taliaferro represents (or at
least did) about the only realistic competition Forsett had for
meaningful carries in this offense since rookie Javorius “Buck”
Allen is more of a passing-down back. Fitzgerald Toussaint and
Terrence Magee are emergency depth, assuming either one or both
even make the team. Forsett (40 runs of 10-plus yards) ranked
second in the league last year behind DeMarco Murray (45) and
led the NFL with 17 runs of 20-plus yards. He did this despite
recording only 235 carries, which seems like a more than realistic
number for him to achieve again this season. Even if his 5.4 YPC
drops by a half-yard behind one of the league’s best run-blocking
lines this season, the lack of viable receiving options and likely
boost in receptions that Forsett is likely to see should easily
keep last year’s surprise breakout star firmly in the RB1
discussion.
The story of August was the season-ending injury to Packers WR
Jordy Nelson. I recognize the fantasy community isn’t going
to like any receiver breaking into the group of five most have
identified as the top wideouts (Antonio Brown, Demaryius Thomas,
Julio Jones, Dez Bryant and Odell Beckham Jr., but I believe Nelson’s
injury is probably going to give Randall Cobb the 20 or so extra
targets he needs to move from a player going in the middle of
the second round to one that forces his way into the top five
receivers. Admittedly, it’s not a bold prediction to suggest
a receiver could move from eighth place in 2014 to a fourth-place
finish in 2015 as a result of his transition from option 1B to
the clear top target. Another reason Cobb’s owners can feel
confident is because he is so efficient; last season, the fourth-year
Kentucky product finished in a tie for 20th among wide receivers
with 127 targets, yet finished in a tie for eighth with Beckham
with 91 catches. Even more impressive, Cobb caught a remarkable
71.6 percent of his targets, which actually lowered his career
average to 73.7 percent. (In other words, his catch rate is sustainable.)
Now for the most impressive part: while Beckham was turning heads
with his otherworldly production (91-1,305-12), Cobb did pretty
much the same thing on three fewer targets (91-1,287-12). There
is plenty of reason to believe Beckham won’t be able to
match last year’s production (such as his injury history,
any improvement over last year from Rueben Randle, the return
of Victor Cruz and/or the addition of Shane Vereen); on the other
hand, Cobb has a clear path to more targets and access to perhaps
the best quarterback in the game.
Without question, I am more conflicted about DeMarco
Murray than any other player in the top 25. I love his age,
the talent, the scheme and the potential of any back with his
skill in a Chip Kelly offense. I cannot stand last season’s workload,
his track record for durability or the threat of Ryan
Mathews and Darren
Sproles stealing anywhere from 8-15 touches per game when
everyone is healthy. Kelly’s devotion to sports science suggests
to me that if any coach can manage their way around a back coming
off a high-usage season or Murray’s injury history, it would be
Kelly. Although the Eagles have been one of the healthier teams
in the league since he arrived, Kelly’s approach (obviously) doesn’t
eliminate injuries and there is significantly more evidence to
suggest that Murray isn’t going to last the season than there
is that Kelly can keep him on the field for all 16 games. When
I can simultaneously make a case how the same player can be a
top-five overall pick and not be worth a pick in the first three
rounds, it probably means he belongs somewhere in the middle of
the second round as a high-upside second option on a fantasy team.
26-50:
Want to talk about another proven running back with even
more volatility than Murray? I offer you LeSean McCoy, who is
probably the odds-on favorite to lead the league in carries if
he suits up 16 times this season. So what’s the problem?
I don’t like talking about “if” any of my top
three picks in any draft can stay healthy as if it is something
I should I need to pray for each night. I documented his offseason/preseason
injury and offensive line woes under the TFC
Big Board last week, so I’ll give that side of the argument
a rest. On the other hand, I believe one personnel move is all
it would take for the ex-Eagle to post another McCoy-like season.
While the thought of Tyrod Taylor as the Bills’ starting
quarterback this season probably doesn’t excite the masses
(especially as it relates to the passing attack), is it really
all that difficult to imagine watching him run read-option 5-8
times a game for a play-caller who utilized it so often at times
in San Francisco? I don’t think it is a stretch at all and,
in fact, I think I would recommend it as a way to accentuate the
strengths of Taylor and McCoy. The thought of roughly 300 carries
for an elusive back like McCoy in an offense that can cause linebackers
to hesitate for a split-second sounds like a recipe for fantasy
success to me. The problem with that logic is that Buffalo probably
has a short leash on Taylor despite naming him the starter and
hasn’t really given any indication that it will attempt
to execute the plan I laid out during the preseason. Of course,
this all assumes the hamstring Buffalo is “cautiously optimistic”
about will heal in time for McCoy to play in the opener.
As we progress through five Big Boards in five days, I’m going
to write a time or two about underrated New York Jets’ offense.
(Yes, you read that right.) Although the rankings at the end of
each year wouldn’t suggest it, OC Chan Gailey has consistently
coaxed production out of teams and players that have often not
been productive for any other team and/or play-caller. (The names
of Kordell Stewart, Tyler Thigpen, C.J.
Spiller and Steve
Johnson come immediately to mind, although I expect the last
two will remove themselves from this list in 2015.) Brandon
Marshall has been productive just about everywhere he has
been and he’s generally been a target monster at each stop. To
that end, the 31-year-old had seen no fewer than 141 targets in
any year since his rookie season in 2006 prior to last year’s
injury-shortened campaign when finished with 106. Marshall is
a No. 1 option yet again in New York, although it appears owners
may be scared off a bit by his age, last year’s injury or the
fact he will have to catch passes from Ryan
Fitzpatrick or Geno
Smith all season. If owners want to use age and the way the
2014 season ended against Marshall, that’s fine. Just understand
that the five-time Pro Bowler has finished inside the PPR top
12 at his position every year in which he has played at least
15 games since 2007 and will be playing for Gailey, who memorably
force-fed Johnson the ball during their time together in Buffalo
(with Fitzpatrick at quarterback, no less). The other point to
consider is this: Marshall might as well be this generation’s
Tim Brown. During his enshrinement ceremony in July, Brown rattled
off the 19 quarterbacks he caught passes from during his NFL career
with Rich Gannon being, by far, the most accomplished. It could
be said that Marshall hasn’t been any more fortunate since Jay
Cutler, Chad
Henne and Kyle
Orton represent the best of Marshall’s former signal-callers.
The point? Don’t knock Marshall because of his quarterback situation;
he’s been there and done that.
In a PPR format, I cannot tell you how much I like Jarvis Landry.
His skill is being somewhat diminished by the number of short
routes he runs in the Miami offense, but that is about the only
complaint anyone can make about a player capable of 100 catches
and 10 touchdowns. So why do I have him ranked at the end of the
third round? Call it what you will, but I’d be surprised
if rookie DeVante Parker hasn’t formed a bond with Ryan
Tannehill that is every bit as strong as the quarterback’s
current bond with Landry by the end of the season. It is that
fear that will cause me to hesitate on Landry in my drafts over
the next 1 ½ weeks. Let’s not forget that Parker
reminds many of A.J. Green and, while I don’t think he’s
quite at that level, I don’t think the comparison is that
far off. How long will it take Parker to find his form after missing
the preseason? Four weeks? All season? It is a question Landry’s
owners need to consider. The main thing working in Landry’s
favor is that he is currently Tannehill’s No. 1 option and
sometimes nothing else matters, regardless of the talent the rest
of the supporting cast has.
51-100:
Making the always-smooth transition from a heavy emphasis on teams
that play in the east to a Midwest team that plays in the NFC
East, the Cowboys could be on the verge of screwing up what was
already a mind-boggling situation to begin with. I had no issue
with letting DeMarco Murray walk after running him into the ground
last season because Dallas was certain to find a viable replacement
in free agency and/or the draft. Right? Right?? Other than sharing
the same first and last initials and a lengthy injury history,
Darren
McFadden and Murray don’t have much else in common. Murray
can operate fine behind man- or zone-blocking schemes (the Cowboys
utilize both) while McFadden has consistently struggled behind
the latter during the rare time in his career he’s actually been
healthy enough to play. Joseph
Randle was expected to be the starter all offseason, but Yahoo’s
Charles Robinson reported over the weekend that Dallas believes
McFadden is the “best of the bunch” and the backfield will “be
a committee in the purest NFL form”. The news of a committee isn’t
particularly shocking since Dallas has stuck to that story for
most of the summer, but the idea that McFadden is the apple of
the Cowboys’ eye is. I maintain Dallas is hoping that another
team parts ways with a younger running back with some upside at
final cuts (Montee
Ball, Ka’Deem
Carey or even UDFA Thomas Rawls could all be considered upgrades).
The fact the Cowboys are not interested in any backs “at this
point” (such as the recently-released Fred
Jackson) is an indication to me they don’t have nearly as
much confidence in their backfield as they say they do. Redraft,
keeper and dynasty owners alike need to be glued to the TV and/or
internet at final cuts; the odds are strong Dallas’ leading rusher
for 2015 isn’t on the roster yet.
Consider me impressed by the Chiefs’ willingness (I’ll
call it that as opposed to suggesting they need to do it) to get
Jeremy Maclin involved early and often this preseason. Maclin’s
9.9 YPC on 11 receptions is about what I would expect on a team
quarterbacked by Alex Smith, but his involvement in the red zone
is encouraging. I can’t say my overall impression of his
fantasy ceiling for this year has changed all that much because
HC Andy Reid’s offenses have almost always been balanced
(as it relates to the difference in catches between the top two
wide receivers on the team), but I’ll admit that I’m
more open to reconsider Maclin as a solid WR3 than I was a month
ago. If the preseason is any indication, then my current four-game
projection of 19-220-1 for the former Eagle is probably a pretty
good estimate for the pace he should keep this season (76 receptions
and 880 yards) while four touchdowns might end up being a tad
low. Even if the on-pace projection is spot-on, I’ll strongly
consider a player with those numbers to be worthy of a sixth-round
pick.
Returning to my Big Apple discussion a few paragraphs ago, Eric
Decker has essentially become a forgotten man. Two years ago,
he was a product of Peyton
Manning. Last year, he “overachieved” his way to 74 catches,
962 yards and five touchdowns despite suffering from poor quarterbacking,
poor scheme and the fact he was about the only Jets’ receiver
worth guarding on a regular basis. (Maybe he’s just a really good
receiver?) He might be getting a slight upgrade in quarterback
play in 2015, but I don’t think there is any doubt about the potential
impact Gailey’s offense can have on his fantasy stock or the fact
that Marshall will attract all the attention Decker was receiving
a season ago. Consider for a second that Ryan Fitzpatrick was
at least partially responsible for helping two receivers finish
among the top 30 PPR receivers last year in a run-heavy offense
in Houston and it doesn’t seem so far-fetched that he could do
the same thing in New York in his second tour of duty under Gailey.
For a player with 70-catch and 6-8 touchdown upside, Decker’s
early-10th round ADP makes him a bargain.
101-175:
The fact there hasn’t been a hint of contract extension talks
between Washington and Alfred
Morris suggests the team already has a pretty good idea rookie
Matt
Jones is the future at running back in D.C. The real question
then becomes how soon will the future arrive? Jones offers the
Redskins something in the passing game Morris just doesn’t have
and similar physicality as a runner, so one has to wonder how
long they’ll stick with Morris if their season goes south yet
again. Jones is almost certain to get more than the 82 offensive
touches then-backup Roy
Helu saw last year, so will Washington’s renewed emphasis
on the ground game leave Morris and Jones with enough volume so
that both players can be relevant in fantasy? Or worse yet, will
Jones steal just enough work to make Morris a fringe fantasy starter
but not enough to make himself a regular flex option? Regardless
of what happens, the rookie’s all-around skills are worth stashing
in all leagues; Morris has yet to miss a game after piling 876
regular-season carries in his first three NFL seasons, so it’s
not too hard to imagine he’s “due” for a multi-game absence at
some point in the near future.
While Fred Jackson’s release on Monday was due in part to give
the respected veteran more time to find another employer, Buffalo
also presumably made the move in part because it likes what it
has in rookie Karlos
Williams, who is still reportedly recovering from an emergency
undisclosed operation. Prior to that injury, I was impressed with
what I saw of the rookie in the first week of the preseason, particularly
the burst he showed on his two catches against the Panthers. At
6-1 and 230 pounds, Williams makes a ton of sense as a battering
ram to use whenever LeSean McCoy needs a rest or is forced to
miss time in the Bills’ run-heavy attack. Anthony
Dixon may be listed as the next man up at the moment, but
he is mostly a career special-teamer that showed very little when
he got his chance at some extended playing time last year. It
would not surprise me in the least if Buffalo ends up placing
Williams in the same role it envisioned for Jackson. In fact,
that is exactly what I expect to happen and why I have rated where
I do.
176-200:
For all intents and purposes, each of my five Big Boards this
week will be a top 175 followed by a list of 25 players I believe
are on the verge of, at the very least, being somewhat useful
fantasy properties. They range from the players that could be
an emergency flex option (such as Mike
Tolbert, who would probably share carries with Cameron
Artis-Payne and keep his role as a third-down back in the
event of an injury to Jonathan
Stewart) to those that could have sneaky immediate value (Jonas
Gray) and also includes a handful of supremely-talent athletes
batting for third-receiver roles on highly-explosive offenses
that figure to sabotage each other’s value when both are healthy
(Ty
Montgomery and Jeff
Janis).
Assuming Fred
Jackson doesn’t resurface in New England (a distinct possibility
given how often HC Bill Belichick has spoken in glowing terms
about him), LeGarrette
Blount would seem to be a lock for early-down work. The thing
about the Patriots is that we aren’t really ever quite sure about
their backfield and this preseason has been an extension of that.
Blount was playing well into the fourth quarter of New England’s
Preseason Week 3 win over Carolina after Jonas Gray got the start.
Gray did very little, as did passing-down back Brandon
Bolden. James White, who leads all Patriots’ running backs
in snaps this preseason, was only out on the field for two plays
in the same game. Dion
Lewis looked spry for the second straight week in limited
action and appears to be White’s main challenger to replace Shane
Vereen since Travaris
Cadet has been unable to get on the field due to injury. Bolden
has significant value to New England as a key special-teams contributor.
While the Blount-Gray switch-a-roo smells like a typical Belichiick
mind game, can we be sure that is all it is? What if Gray tears
up Pittsburgh on Opening Night during Blount’s one-game suspension?
Is White being rested because Belichick and OC Josh McDaniels
know he’s “the guy” or is Lewis being groomed for that pass-catching
role now that he is healthy? The point to all of this is that
I have to rank Blount as a late sixth-rounder because he has the
potential to be a 1,000-yard rusher and score 10 times in this
offense. White is ranked where he is because could be the new
Vereen. But are we even all that sure the Patriots aren’t rolling
with Gray and Lewis come Week 2? None of these questions are ones
we’ll get definite answers for because we are dealing with Belichick.
Making matters worse, the committee will probably reduce the winner(s)
of this backfield into an inconsistent flex option at best.
Jordan
Reed gets a mention here because he is essentially the last
man standing at his position, but his spot on the Big Board might
as well read “Washington tight end” because I believe Derek
Carrier, who was acquired on Aug. 21 from San Francisco, will
eventually become the starter. Since I cannot predict how long
Reed will stay healthy in 2015 and because he has significant
upside when he isn’t injured, I’m not going to insert Carrier’s
name. But the same durability issues that led HC Jay Gruden to
demote Reed in favor of Niles Paul about a month ago figure to
rear their ugly head yet again at some point this season and,
when they do, Carrier will be waiting. The product of Beloit (Wis.)
College often appeared to be the second-best tight end in San
Francisco last year, so I don’t doubt he will be a more-than-serviceable
player if/when he gets the nod. I hesitate to go so far as to
say he will be fantasy-viable this season, but he’s a capable
receiver in an offense that is willing to involve the tight end.
Doug Orth has written for FF
Today since 2006 and been featured in USA Today’s Fantasy
Football Preview magazine since 2010. He hosted USA Today’s
hour-long, pre-kickoff fantasy football internet chat every Sunday
in 2012-13 and appears as a guest analyst on a number of national
sports radio shows, including Sirius XM’s “Fantasy Drive”.
Doug is also a member of the Fantasy Sports Writers Association.