Football is simple at its very core but a very complex game to evaluate
and analyze because 11 men try to work in harmony roughly 60 times
per game, while 11 other men make it their job to disrupt that harmony.
Pro football is not pro basketball in that a team can clear out
one side of the court when things break down and the offense can
still score. Pro football is also not pro baseball in that one player
can defeat a pitcher and eight fielders by timing his swing just
right. Even as great as Barry Sanders was, he never beat a defense
all by himself. In football, every player needs some help to accomplish
his goal. That is part of what makes football so great and part
of what makes it so highly unpredictable. The violence of the game
- even by the tamer standards now - adds another element to the
equation that is difficult to quantify.
Regardless, it does not mean we should not try. Over the last
month, I have evaluated the weekly matchups for 500-plus players.
Analyzing matchups alone requires me to make more than 8,000 "decisions".
Each year, my goal is to give those who put their faith in my
evaluations the confidence they have the best draft-day tool at
their disposal. Even if my grading process is only 70 percent
accurate, that is still a significant advantage over any analyst
who does not consider it at all.
Fantasy football is a stock market game, and the job of an analyst
is to identify when stocks are poised to skyrocket or ready to
tank. While last year's results help fantasy managers/analysts
set the table for the following season, they are merely a starting
point. Fantasy rankings and drafting need to be predictive, not
reactive. I have taken this approach for more than 15 years. While
some of the processes have changed in that time, the main goal
has not.
The Success Score Index (SSI) below is powered
in large part by my target and carry predictions. As always, the
matchup grades are included in the algorithm. SSI allows me to
compare apples to oranges across positions. Perhaps just as importantly,
I have been able to eliminate most of the guesswork across different
scoring systems (PPR, standard, etc.).
For all of those unfamiliar with my Big Boards, allow me to explain
the color-coding system before we start:
Red – For lower-level players, a red matchup
is the most difficult one a player can face. For a second- or
third-tier player, drop your expectations for them at
least one grade that week (i.e. from WR2 to WR3). For
elite players, expect them to perform one level lower than their
usual status (i.e. RB1 performs like an RB2).
Yellow – For lower-level players, he is a borderline
start at best. For a second- or third-tier player, the slight
edge goes to the defense in what is essentially a toss-up. For
the elite players, expect slightly better than average production.
White – This one can go either way, but I favor
the player over the matchup. Generally speaking, these matchups
are winnable for all levels of players.
Green – For non-elite players, the stage is
set for a player to have a productive day. For the elite player,
this matchup could produce special numbers.
Note: Players with a
next to their name have some degree of injury/character/holdout
concern. In addition, I have added distinct tiers for this round
of Big Boards (represented by the different colors in the "Pos"
column).
Over the next two weeks, I will release my first Big Boards for
Half-PPR, superflex and standard leagues as well as the FFPC Big
Boards. In the second and final round of Big Boards near the end
of the preseason, I will rank at least 225 players and present
my final rankings for kickers and defense/special teams.
Here is the scoring
system that I used to rank the players in the PPR format:
Blue chipper is a term that gets used a lot more in college football
recruiting, but it probably needs to be used a lot more in fantasy
circles. It would behoove managers to think about fantasy drafts
in the same way NFL general managers view the NFL Draft - at least
in this regard. Just like in the NFL Draft, there are usually
about seven or eight players - give or take - whom teams should
take regardless of what is on their roster. A perfect example
from this spring's draft was Brock Bowers. Was tight end a need
for the Raiders? No. Can you find a way to use his unique talents
and build your offense around him in the coming years as Davante Adams begins to decline? Absolutely. (The same thing is applicable
in fantasy.) There are roughly another 10 college players who
are widely considered to be first-round talents in April. That
adds to 18 or so players. Just because there are 32 first-round
picks does not mean there are 32 players worth going in the first
round. Similarly, fantasy drafts sometimes provide managers with
eight obvious first-round picks and 10 players worth taking in
the second round.
The top 10 players listed above are there for a reason: they
have the best combination of the many factors we consider in fantasy,
such as elite talent, situation and/or scheme. (The top five have
the fewest questions and the most upside - that much should be
obvious to even the most casual fantasy manager.) The top 10 players
are this year's blue-chippers. History tells us that maybe half
of these players will disappoint, but that is also looking at
the glass half-empty.
If a blue chipper falls into your lap, grab him. If another lasts
until the second round, grab him too. Your job as a fantasy manager
is to gain an edge with every pick if possible. Drafting a potential
100-catch, 1,400-yard, 8-10 touchdown receiver at 2.03 may not
fit into the original draft plan, but it sure makes it difficult
for the rest of your league to keep up if you have two of those
players. Managers should enter the draft with a plan - maybe even
a preference on how to build their team - but understand when
an opportunity presents itself.
YOUR FIRST TWO OR THREE PICKS SET THE FOUNDATION FOR HOW/WHO
YOU SHOULD DRAFT THE REST OF THE WAY. THE INABILITY TO RECOGNIZE
VALUE EARLY WILL EVENTUALLY FORCE YOU TO REACH ON A PLAYER LATER.
As I have learned playing in the 14-team King's Classic over
the years, a receiver-heavy approach is probably the way to go
more often than not because the waiver wire may only present a
handful of nuggets throughout the season. In other words, it makes
sense to build more of an anti-fragile roster because one or two
key injuries to a fantasy team in those leagues are usually catastrophic.
A receiver-heavy approach also makes sense in best ball because
upside and availability may be the two most important qualities
our players can have in that format - in large part because there
is no ability to add players during the season.
However, in a managed 12-team PPR league, our job as managers
is to secure as much talent as possible during the draft and figure
out how to manage it later. A sixth-round "need" pick
at any position is going to look silly in late October if a player
who had a fourth-round value was still available.
I am in the middle of a slow draft as we speak. The original
plan was to select three receivers and a running back through
four rounds and then grab a quarterback/running back and tight
end in Rounds 5 and 6. My picks are as follows so far:
There are two points I want to make before moving on to some
player analysis:
1) Let us assume receiver will be the weakest spot on my team,
even though I have both players ranked inside my top 35. I desperately
wanted to take a third receiver with my sixth-round pick. Yet,
I decided I could not pass on a player who has averaged more points
per game in each of his three seasons in Arizona (his 15.5 FPts/G
in 2023 was his lowest since joining the Cardinals) than all but
17 receivers in 2023, 12 receivers in 2022 and 14 receivers in
2021. Assuming I am right about Jacobs and Conner, I will likely
have the option of dealing Gibbs to the highest bidder if necessary
- it is a given that someone will be interested in him. With that
said, there is a lot of depth at receiver this season, so it may
not come to that.
2) I spoke earlier about micro edges. Fantasy managers can get
caught up in "my receivers are better than your receivers"
or "my running backs stink compared to your running backs"
thinking. Using the above team I am drafting as an example, I
tend to look at lineups (I call them "cross matchups")
as follows:
My Team
Other Team
Wilson
WR1
Gibbs
RB1
Kelce
WR2
Jacobs
RB2
McLaurin
WR3
Conner
FLex
WR3
TE1
Kelce's 14.8 FPts/G last year was easily his lowest mark in nearly
a decade. There is also not a time in recent memory in which 14.8
FPts/G would not have been good for at least mid-range WR2 status
if we lump receivers and tight ends together. Assuming Kelce's
dip in production was mostly a result of him being hobbled by
his ankle injury for the first half of the season and the Chiefs'
lack of speed all year long, I only need my WR3 to outperform
other managers' tight end to gain an edge - perhaps a significant
one.
Blue Chippers (1-10)
Christian McCaffrey sits atop the Big Board for the fourth time
in five seasons, but the gap between him and the rest of the crowd
is as narrow as it has been over that time. CMC is coming off
a season in which he handled 417 touches - including the playoffs
- and turned 28 in early June. Some backs can defy the age cliff
and the post-heavy workload struggles better than others, and
McCaffrey would seem to be one of those players. However, we are
nearing the point of his career where it might be better to get
out a year too early as opposed to a year too late. With that
said, he has always been a disciplined athlete and keeps himself
in great shape, so I choose to believe he has one more great season
left in him.
Even though all of them come with some minor questions, there
are no major surprises inside the top 10. Breece Hall rivals CMC
in terms of upside, but when was the last time an Aaron Rodgers-led
offense did not lean on Rodgers? Tyreek Hill is in his age-30
season. It is fair to wonder how much Jaylen Waddle being hurt
last year contributed to Hill's huge season. CeeDee Lamb is holding
out, which could become an issue if it lasts more than a couple
more weeks. Atlanta's brain trust has told us Bijan Robinson will
be fed like McCaffrey. While Tyler Allgeier is not in his class
as a talent, he is also no slouch. I wonder about Allgeier taking
something important away from Robinson, such as the occasional
goal-line carry.
Ja'Marr Chase
is the clear alpha in Cincinnati and easily one of the best receivers
in the league, but his weekly volatility is on the borderline
of what we hope for (expect?) from an elite WR1. Garrett
Wilson has yet to prove it (although I suspect he will in
2024 with a healthy Rodgers), Justin
Jefferson will be getting used to a downgrade at quarterback
and Philadelphia introduced another mouth that needs to be fed
(Saquon Barkley),
which could slightly reduce how much volume A.J.
Brown will see.
The Near Elite (11-25)
This is an interesting group of players, not only because some
of them are already considered blue-chippers by some but also
because I am sure the majority of people do not believe a few
of them belong in this tier.
Jahmyr Gibbs,
Saquon Barkley
and Jonathan
Taylor are all knocking on the door of being considered blue-chippers
this summer. Each one has a strong case, but each one comes with
a question mark. Will Gibbs get enough volume? Will Barkley lose
too many scoring opportunities to Jalen
Hurts? Will Taylor get enough work in the passing game AND/OR
lose too many scoring opportunities to Anthony
Richardson? In the end, all of them are supremely talented
backs who possess the kind of high floor and high ceiling that
makes them players we should not allow to slide past the early
part of the second round.
Depending on your perspective, Kupp is either a 31-year-old player
whose body is breaking down and was overtaken by Nacua in the
offense last season OR someone who has had two seasons of bad
luck following one of the best (and busiest) seasons by a receiver
in league history. He is either the second option in a good offense
OR a player whose connection with his quarterback is as strong
as any duo in the league. Nacua's recent knee injury only helps
the cause for Kupp from a fantasy perspective. If/when both are
healthy, I expect Kupp and Nacua to be a slightly more productive
version of the Robert
Woods-Kupp combo from a few years ago.
The Chiefs have cleared a path for Pacheco to be the man for
the first time since Kareem
Hunt was just getting started. It is up to Pacheco now to
take advantage of the opportunity and stay on the field. Jerick
McKinnon may not have been a critical piece in the Kansas
City offense in 2023, but he was on the field for about a third
of the team's offensive snaps. Clyde
Edwards-Helaire has not made a discernible push to lock down
the backup job and he would seem to be about the only other player
on the roster who could occupy the "McKinnon role." If we assume
that Pacheco maintains a similar rushing workload as last season
(14.6 carries per game) and adds maybe a third to a half of McKinnon's
work in the passing game, the possibility exists for a 300-touch
season. At the very least, Pacheco's job should be much easier
in 2024 with Marquise
Brown and Xavier
Worthy discouraging defenses from crowding the line of scrimmage.
Smith's floor in what became a broken Philadelphia offense last
season was WR16. The year before, he was the WR9. While the Eagles
will likely not have a full-time slot per se, I believe Smith
will see the most work there. In new OC Kellen Moore's offenses,
being the primary slot option has been a good thing. While Smith
may not be the next CeeDee
Lamb (played under Moore from 2020-22) or Keenan
Allen (2023), Moore's primary slot has been a source of much
fantasy joy dating back to Randall
Cobb's last decent season in 2019. Reports out of Philadelphia
have informed us that rookie Johnny
Wilson is making a push for third receiver duties. It seems
unlikely the 6-7 Wilson or the 226-pound Brown will spend an abundance
of time in the slot, which would leave the lightning-quick Smith
as a great alternative inside. Admittedly, I have him projected
to score fewer points than the three receivers directly below
him, but the 12 green matchups were enough for him to get the
nod in this week's submission.
Coming off his first substandard season in what seems like a
generation, the industry is down on Travis Kelce. This has to
be the first time in several years that managers can draft McCaffrey
and Kelce. I am not saying (yet) that it is the greatest idea,
but imagine the possibilities of having the two players who have
been the greatest positional advantages over the last five or
so years on the same team.
Four Stars (26-56)
This group does not need much help to move up into one of the
earlier two groups, but every one of them has a noticeable wart
or two. Two of the poster boys in this range are Kyren
Williams and De'Von
Achane. Williams' projected 17 FPts/G should have him easily
in the middle or late part of the second round, but durability
has been an issue early in his NFL career and virtually no one
expects him to handle 21-plus touches per game like last year.
Furthermore, his foot has already been an issue this offseason.
It also sounds like rookie Blake
Corum was added in the draft to keep Williams fresh, which
sounds a lot like a player who will probably steal at least five
touches per game (or a drive every half) from Williams.
Achane's situation is similar yet very different from Williams'.
Among the similarities: both are undersized and missed a handful
of games last season. Among the differences is that Achane could
not stay healthy on a lighter workload. There are also other complicating
variables with Achane. While the Texas A&M product is a master
of efficiency (not unlike Jahmyr Gibbs), Raheem Mostert is still
around to keep Achane's workload from spiking too much.
There is also the matter of the Miami offensive line. While Mike
McDaniel can scheme up an offense - and get his players out in
space as well as anyone - the
offensive line may be in the worst shape it has been in during
the McDaniel era. Again, these obstacles can be overcome to some
degree with a great play-caller and great talent, but it usually
takes volume to do it. I am projecting Achane for about 70 more
touches in 2024, but will that be enough? Managers should not
allow themselves to be thrown off by his gaudy yard-per-carry
averages in his first three full games as a rookie. While Achane
may push six yards per carry even with everything I have mentioned
already working against him (I have projected for 5.6 YPC), that
is still a lot to overcome.
Before we get too far with this group, I want to address why
Deebo Samuel is so low. Players who we can expect to miss multiple
games (like Samuel) are punished for it within SSI. Samuel would
be right outside the top 25 for me if he was not such a likely
candidate to miss time. Incidentally, Achane and James Conner
would also both be second-round values.
We find our first quarterbacks in this group. In what likely
be a surprise to many, Josh Allen is not included. (More on that
later.) Patrick Mahomes has his best supporting cast since at
least 2020 and probably the best of his career if we include the
offensive line. For now, managers are advised to side with Hurts'
legs and his goal-line prowess, but the line between him and Mahomes
is razor-thin.
The discourse surrounding Josh
Jacobs has been interesting this summer, to say the least.
The masses appear to be surprised he had a down season in 2023
when it should have been somewhat obvious. (He was No. 54 and
the RB20 on my final PPR
Big Board when he was typically going in the second or early
third round in many drafts.) I said the following around late
last August: "Running backs who report late to camp typically
do not fare well, nor do players coming off seasons where they
logged nearly 400 touches." Jacobs met expectations for the
situation he found himself in last summer - do not punish him
for it now. He leaves for a better situation - or at least a better
offense - and Green Bay showed him how much it valued him by cutting
ties with a player it loved in Aaron
Jones. The Packers added MarShawn
Lloyd - a player who never topped 116 carries or 18 catches
in college - in the third round of the draft. Fantasy managers
have responded by pushing Jacobs back about two rounds and seem
legitimately afraid Lloyd will be much more than a breather back
in 2024. Jacobs probably will not get 300 touches, but it would
be shocking if he is not the clear lead back.
While we are on the subject of Jacobs, I would suspect an organization
as good as the Packers understood what he is when they pursued
him in free agency: a volume rusher who is one of the best backs
in the league after contact. There is also some discussion regarding
HC Matt LaFleur being a committee backfield coach. Jones' arrival
predated LaFleur's. What was he supposed to do? Pound Jones into
the ground when he proved unable to carry a heavy workload year
after year? Dump a highly productive and efficient back carrying
a very manageable cap number during the final years of Aaron Rodgers'
time in Green Bay? No offense to any AJ Dillon or Lloyd loyalists
out there, but what exactly has either one proved to justify fading
a 26-year-old former rushing champion?
Fantasy managers have been waiting for Terry
McLaurin to make the transition from rock-solid consistent
WR2 to WR1. In some ways, he is the new D.J.
Moore - a highly productive player resigned to good but not
great production due to a steady influx of sub-par quarterbacks.
Last year's tag team of Sam
Howell and Jacoby
Brissett may have been the best he has played with to this
point. Enter Jayden
Daniels, who has injected more hope in Washington's offense
than any quarterback has since at least Robert Griffin III. There
may not be an immediate ascension into superstardom for McLaurin,
but it is a good bet he - just like Moore - will find his way
into 90 catches with a quarterback capable of lighting up defenses
with his accuracy or his legs. Daniels will quickly prove to be
the real deal. McLaurin is the overwhelming favorite to benefit
the most from it.
Pour One Out For The Bills
As I alluded to earlier, Bills Mafia will not be happy with me.
One of the reasons why Buffalo players' ranking is depressed is
because I am projecting Josh Allen to miss a game for only the
second time in four seasons. However, that is only a minor contributing
factor. There have only been two quarterbacks in league history
to run the ball at least 100 times in a season at Allen's current
age (28): Cam Newton and Michael Vick. Suffice it to say neither
quarterback enjoyed more than one more good rushing season after
that.
There is more. The loss of Stefon Diggs will hurt because defenses
will no longer have to account for the presence of an alpha receiver.
Coverage schemes change as a result. Dalton Kincaid is a very
good NFL tight end, but can he beat defenses that know he is likely
now Allen's primary target? Can Keon Coleman be what Buffalo wanted
Gabe Davis to be? Are Curtis Samuel and Khalil Shakir good enough
to scare defenses? Allen's rise to prominence coincided with the
acquisition of Diggs. The likelihood is that Allen has reached
a point in his development where he no longer needs an alpha to
be a great quarterback, but let's not pretend that his current
situation does not bear some resemblance to the one Patrick Mahomes
faced last year. Buffalo's current receivers/pass-catchers are
better than what the Chiefs gave Mahomes in 2023, but it is not
by much.
James Cook is a solid NFL back who proved many doubters wrong
about his ability to handle a heavy workload last year. Or did
he? Cook did not consistently begin to take on a heavy workload
until Week 11. Over those four weeks (Weeks 11-14), he averaged
5.2 yards per carry and caught 16 of 19 targets for 211 yards
while accounting for four of his six touchdowns on the season.
Over his last three games, he averaged 3.1 YPC, caught four of
seven targets for 12 yards and fumbled twice. Did he wear down?
Quite likely. Managers seem keen on drafting him in the fourth
round this summer despite the fact Buffalo added a powerful back
in Ray Davis, who should end any chance Cook had of seeing regular
goal-line work. While Buffalo could cut back Cook's work as a
runner (237 carries in 2023) and give him more work as a receiver
(44 catches), how much more work is he going to see? Is 60 receptions
a realistic number? The point to be made here is that Cook is
unlikely to see heavy volume, possesses little to no less TD upside
and has a capable back pushing him for work now in what will likely
be a worse offense than last year.
Kincaid will soon be a star in the NFL. It is my belief in him
that I have him as high as I do. Perhaps I am reading too much
into last season, but Kincaid still has a Dawson Knox problem.
Let's just say the difference in Kincaid's production when Knox
played and when he didn't was notable. Kincaid did not score a
touchdown in nine games with Knox playing and averaged 7.7 fantasy
points in those outings. In seven games without Kincaid, he scored
twice and averaged 12 fantasy points. Perhaps the emphasis on
getting Kincaid the ball will change now that Diggs is no longer
an option, but wasn't Diggs mostly an afterthought once OC Joe
Brady took over last year? I have already participated in drafts
recently in which Kincaid was selected before Travis Kelce and
Mark Andrews. I do not see how Kincaid will perform anywhere close
to that level in 2024.
Ending On A High Note
Note: Due to my annual trip to Ohio for the King's Classic
and the Fantasy Football Expo, you will see nothing but Big Boards
between now and Aug. 20. When I return to writing in a couple
of weeks, I intend on spending more time on players after the
10th round (when most fantasy teams have secured their starters).
Without question, one of the players I am sure I will be heavy
on is Josh Downs. Not only did he earn 98 targets despite playing
through a knee injury as a rookie, but he also was highly involved
in the offense for the short time that Anthony Richardson was
running it. While I do not look at ADP much other than when I
am doing research for an article, it appears he is typically going
in the 12th round or later and considered a back-end WR5. I cannot
imagine a scenario in which he stays healthy and fails to push
for 80 catches. That is at least a WR3 even if he suffers from
bad touchdown luck.
Nick Chubb is a player I will gladly try to push up the board
as the season nears, but there are simply too many unknowns at
this point. I have projected him to miss the first four games
and five overall. Those likely absences combined with what figures
to be a bit of a ramp-up period upon his return are the primary
reasons he is where he is as opposed to a 10th-round option. With
that said, he is a great swing for the fences for any owner who
spent the first 10 or so rounds investing heavily at quarterback,
receiver and tight end and is looking for an upside RB3 or RB4
pick.
I am leaving every draft with Justin Fields if possible. Name
another "backup" quarterback available in the last round
of drafts who has already proven he is capable of being a fantasy
QB1. The funny thing is that the possibility of him being the
starting quarterback in Pittsburgh sooner than later is not that
far-fetched.
Doug Orth has written for FF Today since 2006 and been featured
in USA TODAY's Fantasy Football Preview magazine since 2010. He
is also a high-stakes player who often appears as a guest analyst
on a number of national sports radio shows, such as Sirius XM's
"Fantasy Drive." Doug is also a member of the Fantasy
Sports Writers Association.