Football is simple at its very core but a very complex game to evaluate
and analyze because 11 men try to work in harmony roughly 60 times
per game, while 11 other men make it their job to disrupt that harmony.
Pro football is not pro basketball in that a team can clear out
one side of the court when things break down and the offense can
still score. Pro football is also not pro baseball in that one player
can defeat a pitcher and eight fielders by timing his swing just
right. Even as great as Barry Sanders was, he never beat a defense
all by himself. In football, every player needs some help to accomplish
his goal. That is part of what makes football so great and part
of what makes it so highly unpredictable. The violence of the game
- even by the tamer standards now - adds another element to the
equation that is difficult to quantify.
Regardless, it does not mean we should not try. Over the last
month, I have evaluated the weekly matchups for 500-plus players.
Analyzing matchups alone requires me to make more than 8,000 "decisions".
Each year, my goal is to give those who put their faith in my
evaluations the confidence they have the best draft-day tool at
their disposal. Even if my grading process is only 70 percent
accurate, that is still a significant advantage over any analyst
who does not consider it at all.
Fantasy football is a stock market game, and the job of an analyst
is to identify when stocks are poised to skyrocket or ready to
tank. While last year's results help fantasy managers/analysts
set the table for the following season, they are merely a starting
point. Fantasy rankings and drafting need to be predictive, not
reactive. I have taken this approach for more than 15 years. While
some of the processes have changed in that time, the main goal
has not.
The Success Score Index (SSI) below is powered
in large part by my target and carry predictions. As always, the
matchup grades are included in the algorithm. SSI allows me to
compare apples to oranges across positions. Perhaps just as importantly,
I have been able to eliminate most of the guesswork across different
scoring systems (PPR, standard, etc.).
For all of those unfamiliar with my Big Boards, allow me to explain
the color-coding system before we start:
Red – For lower-level players, a red matchup
is the most difficult one a player can face. For a second- or
third-tier player, drop your expectations for them at
least one grade that week (i.e. from WR2 to WR3). For
elite players, expect them to perform one level lower than their
usual status (i.e. RB1 performs like an RB2).
Yellow – For lower-level players, he is a borderline
start at best. For a second- or third-tier player, the slight
edge goes to the defense in what is essentially a toss-up. For
the elite players, expect slightly better than average production.
White – This one can go either way, but I favor
the player over the matchup. Generally speaking, these matchups
are winnable for all levels of players.
Green – For non-elite players, the stage is
set for a player to have a productive day. For the elite player,
this matchup could produce special numbers.
Note: Players with a
next to their name have some degree of injury/character/holdout
concern. In addition, I have added distinct tiers for this round
of Big Boards (represented by the different colors in the "Pos"
column).
Over the next few days, I will release my second and final Big
Board for superflex leagues.
Here is the scoring
system that I used to rank the players in the FFPC format:
Doug Orth has written for FF Today since 2006 and been featured
in USA TODAY's Fantasy Football Preview magazine since 2010. He
is also a high-stakes player who often appears as a guest analyst
on a number of national sports radio shows, such as Sirius XM's
"Fantasy Drive." Doug is also a member of the Fantasy
Sports Writers Association.
next to their name have some degree of injury/character/holdout
concern. In addition, I have added distinct tiers for this round
of Big Boards (represented by the different colors in the "Pos"
column).
