Football is simple at its very core but a very complex game to evaluate
and analyze because 11 men are asked to work in harmony approximately
60 times per game, while 11 other men are being asked to disrupt
that harmony. Pro football is not pro basketball in that a team
can clear out one side of the court when things break down and the
offense can still score. Pro football is not pro baseball in that
one player can defeat a pitcher and eight fielders by timing his
swing just right. Even as great as Barry Sanders was, he never beat
a defense all by himself. In football, every player needs some help
to accomplish his goal. That is part of what makes football so great
and part of what makes it so highly unpredictable. The violence
of the game - even by the tamer standards now - adds another element
to the equation that is difficult to quantify.
Regardless, it does not mean we should not try. Over the last
month, I have evaluated the weekly matchups for 500-plus players.
Analyzing matchups alone requires me to make more than 8,000 "decisions".
That is not a humble brag. Each year, my goal is to give those
who put their faith in my evaluations the confidence they have
the best draft-day tool at their disposal. Even if my grading
process is only 70 percent accurate, that is still a significant
advantage over any analyst that does not consider it at all. I
like to believe that even if readers believe my process is flawed
for whatever reason, they can appreciate how much thought has
been put into that opinion.
Fantasy football is a stock market game, and the job of an analyst
is to identify when stocks are poised to skyrocket or ready to
tank. While last year's results help fantasy managers/analysts
set the table for the following season, they are merely a starting
point. Fantasy rankings and drafting need to be predictive, not
reactive. I have taken this approach for more than 15 years. While
some of the processes have changed in that time, the main goal
has not.
The Success Score Index (SSI) below is powered
in large part by my target and carry predictions. As always, the
matchup grades are included in the algorithm. SSI allows me to
compare apples to oranges across positions. Perhaps just as importantly,
I have been able to eliminate most of the guesswork across different
scoring systems (PPR, standard, etc.).
For all of those unfamiliar with my Big Boards, allow me to explain
the color-coding system before we start:
Red – For lower-level players, a red matchup
is the most difficult one a player can face. For a second- or
third-tier player, drop your expectations for them at
least one grade that week (i.e. from WR2 to WR3). For
elite players, expect them to perform one level lower than their
usual status (i.e. RB1 performs like an RB2).
Yellow – For lower-level players, he is a borderline
start at best. For a second- or third-tier player, the slight
edge goes to the defense in what is essentially a toss-up. For
the elite players, expect slightly better than average production.
White – This one can go either way, but I favor
the player over the matchup. Generally speaking, these matchups
are winnable for all levels of players.
Green – For non-elite players, the stage is
set for a player to have a productive day. For the elite player,
this matchup could produce special numbers.
Note: Players with a
next to their name have some degree of injury/character/holdout
concern.
Over the next two weeks, I will release my first Big Boards for
Half-PPR and standard leagues as well as Superflex and FFPC Big
Boards. In the second and final round of Big Boards near the end
of the preseason, I will rank at least 200 players and present
my final rankings for kickers and defense/special teams.
Here is the scoring
system that I used to rank the players in the PPR format:
There is only one question fantasy managers need to ask on draft
day when it comes to Christian McCaffrey: Do you believe certain
players are injury-prone or just unlucky? Football is a violent
sport, so just about every player will get hurt and miss games
at some point. So, how many injuries does one player need to suffer
before he is considered "injury-prone"? Or is "injury-prone"
such an established (and easy) narrative that people are willing
to attribute a player's injury "proneness" to his body
being unable to handle the rigors of playing the game?
Regular readers of my work probably already know where I stand
on the questions posed above. I recently made a comparison that
I think helps put the "injury-prone" narrative into
some perspective. When children get sick (and they will), we do
not call them illness-prone. However, when players get hurt (and
they will) more than once, are they injury-prone? McCaffrey played
in 25 of his final 27 college games (averaging 26.8 touches) and
48 of his first 48 games in the NFL (averaging 19.3 touches) before
his injuries finally caught up to him in 2020 and 2021. McCaffrey
is the single-biggest cheat code in fantasy football at our game's
most important position. That is why I am willing to put a player
who has played only 10 of his team's last 33 games atop the Big
Board.
That same sentiment holds for three of the next five players
(Dalvin Cook,
D'Andre Swift
and Saquon
Barkley). As odd as it might sound at first blush, I am more
concerned about Cook's durability than McCaffrey's. Dating back
to 2013, Cook has sustained at least five injuries to his shoulders
(hat tip to Dr. Jesse Morse of The Fantasy Doctors for his research
on that subject matter). Each shoulder injury increases the likelihood
that he will suffer another injury to his shoulder, so there is
definite risk. With that said, new HC Kevin O'Connell is bringing
an outside zone-running scheme with him from the Rams to the Vikings.
In theory, this should be a great thing for Cook's durability
as it should reduce the number of times he has to lower his shoulder
running in between the tackles. It should also allow Cook the
luxury of breaking long runs more often. O'Connell has also talked
up the likelihood of getting the running backs more involved in
the passing game, which should further reduce Cook's odds of taking
unnecessary punishment. Is there still risk with Cook? Of course
there is. However, he may be the one running back capable of competing
with McCaffrey, Jonathan
Taylor and Barkley capable for overall RB1 honors.
In much the same way that I reject the notion that McCaffrey
is "injury-prone," I also reject the notion when it
comes to Barkley. Just about any running back would have suffered
a torn ACL on the play that ended his 2020 season. Anyone who
wants to suggest that his ankle injury in Week 5 last season was
anything more than a fluke needs to watch the play again. Barkley
also has not had the luxury of much help from his line or his
coaches in recent years either. New HC Brian Daboll is unquestionably
the best play-caller the Giants have had since Barkley turned
pro. The addition of OT Evan Neal also gives New York bookend
tackles for the first time in what seems like 10-plus years. The
Giants may not be able to maul many defenses in the running game
yet, but they now can feel reasonably good about giving Barkley
a chance to succeed. Much like Cook in Minnesota, the plan for
Barkley is to feature him more often as a receiver. While using
backs in the passing game more often is not a foolproof way for
them to avoid injuries, it is a smart way to increase the odds
of keeping him healthy. If Barkley stays on the field this year,
Barkley should finish as a top-five back. Fantasy managers will
also be reminded of just how important good play-calling and offensive
line play matters are running backs, which is something Barkley
has not had very often.
11-25
It is hard to recall the last season in which fantasy managers
have allowed so much running back value to slip into the third
and fourth rounds. Nick Chubb, Ezekiel Elliott and Breece Hall
are all regularly available in the third (Zeke and Hall occasionally
slip into the fourth). All three are almost certain to get at
least 200 carries - if healthy for a full season - and two of
them are very good bets to top 40 receptions. In a game where
volume tends to be king, that kind of profile looks royal.
Especially over the last two seasons, Chubb's fantasy upside
has been capped in the passing game by Kareem
Hunt despite the fact the former caught 36 of his 43 targets.
With Deshaun
Watson likely looking at a longer suspension than the six-game
ban announced last week, it means Jacoby
Brissett will be leading the offense. The Browns were already
a run-heavy team even when Baker
Mayfield was playing well, so it makes sense they will only
lean more on Chubb for however long Watson must sit with Brissett
running the show. Expect Stefanski to keep the game plan as conservative
as possible for Brissett, who may struggle to keep Amari
Cooper's value afloat. In two seasons under HC Kevin Stefanski,
Chubb has averaged 16.1 carries per game. That number seems likely
to increase now. While Chubb's lack of usage in the passing game
makes him a better RB2 than RB1 option, it is almost unfair that
a player with his fantasy ceiling can be drafted after a fantasy
manager locks up Jonathan
Taylor and a high-upside WR1 (or Kyle
Pitts). (For those that may not recall, Chubb scored over
20 fantasy points in five of 14 games in 2021 and five of 12 in
2020.)
There will come a time in the near future when passing on Elliott
in fantasy drafts is the right call. It may happen as soon as
next year. It will probably not be this season. The fantasy industry's
desire to kick Elliott to the curb (or at least fade him) in favor
of Tony Pollard may be one of the more egregious errors in the
last 10 years. Elliott has yet to finish lower than RB12 in any
of his six NFL seasons, yet he is already being drafted as if
he is in danger of losing his job. Last season's decline was almost
certainly caused by the PCL injury he suffered in Week 4. Assuming
that is a true statement, it makes it even harder to understand
how managers can fade a player that has never handled fewer than
268 touches or scored fewer than eight touchdowns in a season.
Perhaps Elliott's biggest issue is that he is not overly flashy.
Flash does not score fantasy points, kids. While Zeke's rushing
crown days are probably in the rearview mirror, his track record
of consistent production and ability to take the field each week
is as good as any back's. Sometimes fantasy football is not that
hard; draft Elliott with confidence in the third round and feel
good about the likelihood he will reward you with at least 1,200
total yards and 10 touchdowns.
Hall is less of a no-brainer than either Chubb or Elliott, but
one could argue his upside is the greatest of the three. The Jets
should boast a much-improved offense in 2022, if only because
they added OG Laken Tomlinson to the line and gave Zach Wilson
two more weapons to play with in Garrett Wilson and Tyler Conklin.
While Michael Carter is no slouch and should be considered a lock
for at least a third of the work in this backfield, the Jets also
made it clear with their selection of Hall that they see Carter
as a complementary back. New York notably tried (and failed) to
trade into the first round for Hall only to have him fall in their
lap on Day 2.
While their situations are not the same, Hall gives me a Jonathan
Taylor 2020 vibe as a player who has the requisite size and
athleticism to be a featured back that is available in the third
or fourth round of fantasy drafts. He will play on an offense
desperate for someone to handle about 55-60 percent of the workload.
While Taylor had to prove he was a capable receiver, the Jets
already know Hall has that in his toolbox. Even if we do nothing
more than use New York's backfield totals from last year (311
carries and 125 targets to estimate what is reasonable for Hall
if he handles 60 percent of the backfield work, Hall's floor should
be somewhere around 187 carries and 75 targets. (That is about
the same workload Leonard
Fournette had in 2021.) The Jets should find themselves in
scoring territory much more often this year, meaning Hall should
be a fair bet for at least eight touchdowns.
26-175
There is one glaring omission from the top 12 receivers on my
Big Board. (Congratulations if you said Deebo Samuel. …Oh,
the disrespect!) This has nothing to do with my respect for Samuel,
which only grew last season. This has a lot more to do with the
transition from Jimmy Garoppolo to Trey Lance as his quarterback
and the reemergence of Brandon Aiyuk. Samuel's receiving alone
would have made him the overall WR12, but it was the 59 attempts
and eight touchdowns on the ground last season that catapulted
him into the WR3 seat. My relatively low ranking of him is based
mostly on the likelihood that San Francisco will probably run
him half as much as it did last year AND the overall lack of volume
I expect from the San Francisco passing game. Samuel is such a
monster after the catch that he will maximize his opportunities,
but there comes a point where even a receiver with his run-after-catch
ability cannot compete with other receivers around the league
getting 30-50 more targets.
Wide receivers get exceptionally hard to rank after about the
first 20 or so. Look no further than the cluster that begins with
DK Metcalf
at 52 and ends with Marquise
Brown at 64. Why is this group so difficult? Metcalf is stuck
with either Geno
Smith or Drew
Lock as his quarterback. Elijah
Moore has significant target competition now with Garrett
Wilson. Amon-Ra
St. Brown does too. Hunter
Renfrow probably will not come close to 128 targets in a season
again as long as Davante
Adams is wearing a silver and black uniform. Kadarius
Toney showed brief flashes of his potential last year but
couldn't stay healthy. DeVonta
Smith will play a secondary role to A.J.
Brown most weeks. Michael
Thomas has played very little over the last two seasons and
must battle Chris
Olave and Jarvis
Landry for Jameis
Winston's affection. Rashod
Bateman is the clear top receiver in Baltimore, but he does
not catch many breaks with his projected matchups this year and
figures to fall behind Mark
Andrews in the pecking order once again on a run-heavy team.
Brown is no lock to be Kyler
Murray's favorite target during DeAndre
Hopkins' six-game suspension and it seems unlikely his fortunes
will turn for the better once Hopkins returns.
It is a shame that two of the league's best offenses (and quarterbacks)
in recent years have very little clarity in terms of who their
top targets will be at receiver. I am referring to the Chiefs
and Packers, of course. Skyy Moore is becoming a more popular
mid-round selection by the day, but early reports suggest Kansas
City is more interested in him as an all-purpose weapon in 2022
than as a potential Tyreek Hill replacement. Will JuJu Smith-Schuster
make all of his long-time supporters proud after leaving Roethlisberger
behind for Patrick Mahomes? Or will Kansas City be a pick-your-poison-by-the-week
offense with only Travis Kelce as a constant? I still think Moore
leads this receiver group at the end of the year, but I am not
as confident in that as I was a week ago.
Green Bay's decision to rely on Allen
Lazard as the top receiver figures to test Aaron
Rodgers' ability to make Day 2 or later picks into stars.
(Lazard was an undrafted free agent.) From Greg Jennings and Randall
Cobb to Jordy Nelson and Davante Adams, Rodgers has made them
all stars at some point in their careers. Will Lazard be the next?
His strong finish to last season offers hope (13-plus fantasy
points in four of the team's last five games), but can fantasy
managers pin their hopes on a 26-year-old who has yet to eclipse
40 catches or 513 receiving yards in a season? They may not have
to, especially if Romeo
Doubs has anything to say about it. The rookie fourth-round
selection has been the talk of Packers' camp this summer and appears
destined to take the starting spot opposite Lazard that was supposed
to be reserved for Christian
Watson. The interesting part about a potential Lazard-Doubs
pairing is that both players are known primarily for their ability
to win 50/50 balls and get downfield. However, if you listened
to Rodgers talk
about Doubs last week, you likely came away from it believing
the quarterback thinks he has his next star receiver.
Doug Orth has written for FF Today since 2006 and been featured
in USA TODAY's Fantasy Football Preview magazine since 2010. He
is also a high-stakes player who often appears as a guest analyst
on a number of national sports radio shows, such as Sirius XM's
"Fantasy Drive." Doug is also a member of the Fantasy
Sports Writers Association.